Best of our wild blogs: 12 Dec 08


Exploring Southern Semakau
on the wonderful creation blog and the wild shores of singapore blog and the annotated budak blog

Spectacled Spiderhunter and passiflora
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Terek Sandpiper: Foraging behaviour
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Pulau Ubin trip
on the Birds Rule blog shared by Marcus Ng

Is there such a thing as a good zoo?
on Wild Asia

What is responsible tourism and is it worth doing?
on Wild Asia

The Madness Of King Tides?
on the Malaria, Bedbugs, Sea Lice, and Sunsets blog

Cookie Seastars
versus star cookies and some fossil cookie sea stars on the Echinoblog


Read more!

Seven Solomon dolphins ARE going to the Sentosa Integrated Resort

What the dolphins cost
Solomon Star 11 Dec 08

THE seven live bottlenose dolphins exported to the Philippines early this week will bring more than $3.1 million to the exporters, documents showed.

The documents show one dolphin is being sold at US$60,000 ($448,000). The Government will receive 25 percent duty of the total value which is about $784,000.

Solomon Islands Mammal Education Centre and Exporters Ltd exported the seven dolphins.

The company last year exported 28 dolphins to Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Meanwhile local environmental campaigner Lawrence Makili said the dolphins will be re-exported to Sentosa Resort in Singapore sometimes next year.

“The dolphins were sent to the Philippines only to be trained there. This is because there’s lack of training facilities here,” Mr Makili said.

He said the Philippine Government confirmed that the dolphins will be sent to Singapore in early 2009.

Mr Makili claimed exporter Chris Porter is paying additional money for the dolphins to be trained in the Philippines.

“According to our sources, the fees paid to the trainers would climb up to some USD$20,000 per dolphin, none of which will find its way into the Solomons.”

Mr Makili said the business does not benefit communities in the Solomon Islands but only drains out our pride and God given resource.

“It only benefits the foreigners, the individual dealers and the government,” he said.

He said the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources knew very well that the trade benefits few people but continues to entertain it.

Mr Makili added that the number of dolphin export licences was five at the beginning of this year, but has increased to six and could go up next year.

“If the government continues to issue more licences for dolphin export, the number of export each year would reach the maximum of 100 agreed to by the government which would be very unsustainable, given the unknown number of dolphins in our waters.”

By EDNAL PALMER


Read more!

Nothing to do in Singapore? That's rubbish

Too often, I have heard friends whine about how "there's nothing good to do here", says writer Victoria Barker.

Victoria Barker, My Paper Asia One 12 Dec 08;

WHILE working on a story on staycations recently, I was reminded of something I've been pondering for the last couple of months.

For the uninitiated, a "staycation" - an American-coined phrase that combines "stay-at-home" and "vacation" - means taking a holiday close to home.

I got to enjoy a two-night staycation at the luxury five-star resort Rasa Sentosa while working on my assignment. That's the easy part of the job.

But I also had to come up with edgy, alternative activities for our readers to do.

Initially, I thought that would not be easy. That's because I'm very much a creature of habit. I'm not exactly the adventurous sort when it comes to visiting new places and trying out new pursuits - even here in Singapore.

During the course of my research, I began to realise how much of our tiny 707.1-sq-km island I have yet to experience; places which have nothing to do with the stereotypical "Singaporean" pastimes of watching movies, shopping and - let's not forget - eating.

Too often, I have heard friends whine about how "there's nothing good to do here". Funnily enough, the one friend who consistently disagrees with that notion is non-Singaporean.

Graeme, a Scotsman who loves trying different dishes at hawker centres, is always urging me to "expand my horizons".

"There's so much more out there than you know," he said.

Aside from Graeme, I discovered that may friends and I have been wrong about Singapore.

There are plenty of things to do that don't cost money and many unspoiled gems worth checking out. With the bleak economic outlook, now is the time to get out of our comfort zones and just get out there.

How many of you have visited Chek Jawa on Pulau Ubin?

Did you know that in one small area, you can observe a few ecosystems, ranging from sandy beach and rocky beach to coral rubble and mangroves?

And what about Semakau Landfill, just off Tuas?

No, contrary to popular belief, it's not just a place where all our rubbish is incinerated.

Since 2005, it has also been a haven for nature lovers and outdoor types. There are recreational facilities for activities like sport-fishing and bird-watching.

And instead of spending every free evening at overcrowded dining and clubbing destinations, why not take a leisurely stroll down, say, Chinatown or Arab Street?

Savour the sights, smells, sounds and tastes.

The possibilities are endless. So, I urge my fellow Singaporeans to put aside their reservations and start exploring our homeland.

You might be pleasantly surprised at what you can find.


Read more!

Singapore and the big earthquake within 30 years

Scientists warn of big quake, tsunami
Temblor to hit within 30 years, threatening 1 million lives in Sumatra
Amresh Gunasingham, Straits Times 12 Dec 08;

SUMATRA will be ground zero when the next big earthquake hits, an international team of scientists warned.

A massive earthquake measuring 8.8 on the Richter scale will hit within 30 years, generating 10m-high tsunamis and threatening over a million people living along the western Sumatran coast.
'Tidal waves of this height will certainly cause a lot of destruction and displace hundreds of thousands of people living near the coastline,' said Mr Danny Nata-widjaja, co-leader of a project on regional earthquakes and a member of the Research Centre for Geotechnology at the Indonesian Institute of Sciences.
A tsunami will affect more than a million people living along the coastline, particularly in the densely populated cities of Bengkulu and Padang - the provincial capital of western Sumatra which has a population of 400,000.

Although Singapore may feel some tremors, it will not be affected by the quake, the researchers said.

Since 2005, Padang has been hit by more than five earthquakes measuring 6.5 or higher on the Richter scale. The authorities are trying to shore up Padang's defences by improving roads and buildings.

A local government official, Mr Hendri Agung, said that the city is now hampered by the fact that more than half the population is located within 5km of the shore.

'The main road leading up to higher ground is also too narrow to carry out an evacuation process,' he said, adding that the evacuation could take hours.

Ms Patra Rina Dewi, executive director of Komunitas Siaga Tsumai (Kogami), a non-profit tsunami alert community active in western Sumatra, estimates that rescue operators have only 20 to 30 minutes to evacuate the population.

'It is a big problem given the distance from the shoreline...We can safely assume that at least 60,000 people could be lost if a tsunami hits the city,' she said.

The warning comes barely a year after another powerful earthquake in Sumatra, which killed more than 20 people.

Warnings of another tsunami are based on a study led by eminent geologist Kerry Sieh, 57, director of the Earth Observatory of Singapore at the Nanyang Technological University.

Using data from coral reef upliftment - when a quake occurs, coral reefs are lifted above sea level and die, leaving evidence in the coral's growth patterns - the scientists established a geological record dating back 700 years, which shows a pattern of large earthquakes occurring every 200 years.

'Today, there is no other place on earth that has experienced such a close sequence of quakes in over 100 years,' he said.

The study also determined that the earthquake which struck last year was only the beginning of the next big sequence of earthquakes for the 700km-long stretch of the Sumatran coastline.

The findings were published in today's edition of the prestigious journal Science.

Killer tremors since 2000
Straits Times 12 Dec 08;

# Sept 14, 2007

A succession of powerful earthquakes - one measuring 8.4 on the Richter scale - struck Indonesia over three days, causing thousands of people to flee their homes in fear of a tsunami. The death toll eventually rose to 21.

# July 24, 2005

An earthquake measuring 7.2 on the Richter scale hit India's southern Andaman and Nicobar islands and part of Indonesia. No tsunami was caused and there were no injuries.

# March 28, 2005

A powerful 8.7 Richter earthquake struck northern Sumatra in Indonesia. At least 500 people were killed by collapsing buildings on Nias Island.

# Dec 26, 2004

The world's most powerful earthquake in 40 years caused massive tidal waves that destroyed villages and coastal holiday destinations across South Asia and South-east Asia.

The epicentre was located 9.6km under the Indian Ocean south-east of Banda Aceh, Sumatra.

The death toll eventually rose to more than 225,000 people in 12 countries.

The magnitude 9.2 earthquake was the largest since a 9.2 quake struck Alaska in 1964.

# Nov 2, 2002

A powerful earthquake struck close to Sumatra and killed at least two people. The tremors caused flooding, landslides and widespread damage.

Experts put the strength of the quake at between 6.4 and 7.1 on the Richter scale.

The epicentre was located under the sea, south of the coastal town of Manokwari in the Indonesian province of Irian Jaya.

The big one within 30 years
NTU don helps local NGOs plan escape routes, educate public
Ong Dai Lin, Today Online 12 Dec 08;

FOR the past four years, he has been working with Indonesian non-governmental organisations on developing evacuation routes for earthquakes and teaching the public how to rebuild their lives after a tsunami.

Professor Kerry Sieh, director of the Earth Observatory of Singapore in the Nanyang Technological University, warns that an earthquake with a magnitude of 8.8 on the Richter scale may strike West Sumatra within the next 30 years.

Such an earthquake will trigger a tsunami with waves as high as 5 metres, Prof Sieh said.

“There are about 1.5 million people living along the coast who are susceptible to a potential tsunami,” he said.

Cities along the coast of West Sumatralike Padang and Bengkulu are in the path of the tsunami, and the potential loss of lives there could be more than the 90,000 lost in Banda Aceh in 2004 when the Boxing Day tsunami struck, warned Professor Sieh.

Professor Sieh said: “(Indonesian NGO) Kogami has been focusing on developing evacuation routes, teaching neighbourhoods the best way to go, teaching them what to do after the tsunami if they lose their homes.

“There are other NGOs that are thinking about vertical evacuation structures. You build platforms so that the water can go underneath.

“Others, like civil engineers in local universities, are talking about making sure that new buildings (can withstand) the shaking.”

Other parts of Indonesia will be less vulnerable as the tsunami will be directed southwest into the southern part of the Indian Ocean, but islands such as Mauritius are in its path, he said.

Singapore will feel the tremors of the earthquake but will be largely spared from its destructive impact, he added.

Since 2000, Prof Sieh and nine other scientists have been studying the coral reefs of the Mentawai islands, off the coast of West Sumatra.

The growth bands of the ancient coral allow the scientists to study sea-level fluctuations off West Sumatra dating back to 1300 AD.

They found that a sequence of earthquakes happened once in about 200 years and three cycles of the earthquakes have occurred thus far.

Professor Sieh said: “With the Sept 2007 Sumatra earthquakes, we are now entering into the next cycle ...

“If the remaining earthquakes happen as just one event, it will be an earthquake of about 8.8 magnitude.”

“If they happen as a series of earthquakes, the magnitudes could be smaller,” added Professor Sieh.

The team’s research paper was published in the US-based journal, Science.

The team plans to refine its coralreef research and improve its globalpositioning network to better predict earthquakes.

Sumatra quake likely in few decades
Yahoo News 11 Dec 08;

WASHINGTON – Another devastating earthquake along the coast of western Sumatra is likely during the lifetime of many people now living there, researchers are warning.

More than 200,000 died when a quake in that region generated a tsunami across the Indian Ocean on Dec. 26, 2004, and quakes have continued, including a major shock in 2007.
A research team led by Kerry Sieh of the California Institute of Technology reports in Friday's edition of the journal Science that a quake with loss of life and property equal to that of 2004 could occur within the next few decades.

The researchers reached their conclusion studying earthquake history of the region and sea-level changes recorded on corals.

They found a series of events from 1350 to 1380, from 1606 to 1685 and from 1797 to 1833. The 2007 quake seems to be part of a similar pattern, they suggested, but the history is so variable they cannot make an exact forecast.

"Nevertheless, to those living in harm's way on the coasts of western Sumatra, it should be useful to know that the next great earthquake and tsunami are likely to occur within the next few decades, well within the lifetimes of children and young adults living there now," Sieh's team concluded.

Coral may predict future Indian Ocean quake: study
Yahoo News 11 Dec 08;

HONG KONG (Reuters) – A study of Indonesian reefs showed corals record cyclical environmental events and could predict a massive earthquake in the eastern Indian Ocean within the next 20 years, researchers said on Thursday.

The study of corals off Indonesia's Sumatra island showed they have annual growth rings, like those in tree trunks, which record cyclical events such as earthquakes, the scientists said.

"If previous cycles are a reliable guide we can expect one or more very large west Sumatran earthquakes ... within the next two decades," Kerry Sieh, professor at the California Institute of Technology's Tectonics Observatory, told reporters in Singapore.

Scientists said the earthquake could be similar to the magnitude 9.15 earthquake which sparked the devastating 2004 tsunami and left 230,000 people either dead or missing across Asia.

More than 170,000 of those victims were in Aceh on the northwestern tip of Sumatra.

Sieh said while Thailand and Sri Lanka were unlikely to be affected, people in Sumatra should be prepared.

"The tsunami could be at five meters in Padang (in Sumatra). This is a worse case scenario," he said.

Sieh, whose team's research was published reported in Science journal, said corals off Sumatra's Mentawai Islands showed a major earthquake had occurred every 200 years since 1300.

"When earthquakes push the seafloor upward, lowering local sea level, the corals can't grow upward and grow outward instead," the researchers wrote in Science.

Earlier this month, Sieh and his colleagues reported in the journal Nature that an area off Sumatra that has been the source of disastrous earthquakes, still carried a lot of pent-up pressure that could result in another strong quake.

(Reporting by Matthew Webster in Singapore and Tan Ee Lyn in Hong Kong; Editing by Nita Bhalla and Sophie Hares)


Read more!

Demand grows for local veggies, eggs in Singapore

Rising prices of imports, food safety fears fuelling increased production
Jessica Lim, Straits Times 12 Dec 08;

EVERY day, vegetable farmer Wong Kok Fah spends six hours harvesting vegetables at his 5ha farm in Sungei Tengah. His daily yield - 2 tonnes of leafy greens like cai xin and kai lan - is sold to supermarkets and provision stores the next day.

It is something Mr Wong, 47, has been doing every day since he was a boy, but in the past, he harvested only 1.5 tonnes a day.

'Now, people are buying a lot. I cannot grow enough vegetables,' said the owner of Kok Fah Technology, who has seen demand go up by 30 per cent compared to last year.

The increased overall local food production - consisting mainly of vegetables and eggs - tells the story: Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority figures show that vegetable production in Singapore stood at 19,027 tonnes last year, up from 17,397 tonnes in 2005.

Singapore has also increased production of eggs by 29 million a year since 2005, with the total hitting 373 million eggs last year.

The spiralling prices of vegetable and egg imports, coupled with food safety concerns due to the rising number of diseases spread by food, are the main reasons for the growth of the 'buy local' movement, said farmers who spoke to The Straits Times.

In the past three months, imports of these products from Malaysia - which is the main supplier of eggs and vegetables to Singapore - have as much as doubled due to tighter supply.

'All this means that the price gap between imported vegetables and eggs (and home-grown ones) has narrowed to about 10 per cent,' said Mr Jimmy Kong, 34, who operates a stall at a Serangoon wet market. 'Two years ago, it was about 30 per cent.'

Local farms are making moves to meet this increased demand.

This year, Kok Fah Technology hired 12 more workers and expanded its farming area by 20 per cent.

Six months ago, Quan FA Vegetarian Farm moved from its 1.4ha spot in Lim Chu Kang to another almost twice that size nearby. Since then, production has increased to 5 tonnes a month, from 3.5 tonnes monthly in 2005.

Major egg producer Seng Choon Farm is in talks with the Government to expand. 'We sell about 300,000 eggs daily and we definitely want to increase productivity,' said Seng Choon's manager Koh Yeow Koon in Mandarin.

Cold Storage reported a 20 per cent increase in sales of local vegetables and eggs this year compared to last year.

At NTUC FairPrice, sales of local eggs went up 5 per cent, while that of local vegetables went up 10 per cent.

At Sheng Siong, 10 per cent more local vegetables were sold this year compared to last year.

FairPrice has increased the variety of local greens on its shelves - from 12 types three years ago to 17 types available now.

Sheng Siong has done the same, with seven types of green vegetables available now, up from four last year. 'The time lag from harvest to shelf is shorter for local fare, so they last longer. That is an advantage,' said a Sheng Siong spokesman.

The increased demand, said Singapore Polytechnic retail management lecturer Sarah Lim, is due to more locals 'looking beyond price', a phenomenon 'typical of an increasingly affluent society'.

'But if the price differential is very great,' she added, 'people will probably choose the cheaper product.'

This seems to be the case for Madam Phua Shu Qing, 44, who started inquiring about the origin of vegetables at wet markets about six months ago.

The mother of two said: 'I try to buy more home-grown veggies if prices are not too high. They are usually fresher and I know they are safe to eat.'


Read more!

One food court outlet in Singapore to introduce biodegradable disposables

Song Keng, Channel NewsAsia 11 Dec 08;

SINGAPORE: Come this weekend, ordering your food to dine in or takeaway may leave less of a carbon footprint than in the past.

Import and distribution company CornWare is introducing biodegradable disposable wares.

Made from corn, the prices of these products are comparable to their plastic and styrofoam counterparts.

One outlet of the food court chain Banquet will be using the biodegradable disposable wares from this weekend.

Olive Green Marketing is working with Banquet's other food courts to introduce them at more outlets.

Banquet says the charges for takeaways remain unchanged at 20 cents.

"The biodegradable disposables are carbon neutral. Carbon neutrality is quite a simple concept in the sense that the amount of carbon dioxide that it releases upon incineration in Singapore is at most 32 per cent, as compared to the amount of carbon dioxide released by styrofoam and plastics which is almost 100 per cent," said the executive director of Olive Green Marketing, Aloysius Cheong.

- CNA/yt

A green takeaway at Banquet
Esther Ng, Today Online 12 Dec 08;

WHILE most businesses are cutting back, one company is giving away its products free this weekend, for a good cause — the environment.

At Banquet’s Compass Point branch, OliveGreen Marketing will be sponsoring some 3,000 takeaway boxes. And while they may look like typical styrofoam packs, they are made from biodegradable corn and yam.

The sponsorship, worth $750, is part of Banquet’s pilot study to see how well customers and vendors take to this green product. “We like the fact that these CornWare lunch boxes don’t pollute the environment — it ties in with our green corporate values,” said Ms Noor Hayati Saide, Banquet’s marketing coordinator executive.

The foodcourt chain currently gives customers a 5 per centdiscount if they bring their own container. It will gather feedback from vendors and customers on the CornWare products, before deciding if it will introduce them on a permanent basis.

“I think once people realise that styrofoam is bad, they will want better alternatives,” she said.

Styrofoam takes 100 years to decompose and adds to landfill. It is also said to be a health hazard — styrene, a carcinogen, may leach into the food when Styrofoam is heated, although there are no conclusive studies.CornWare products, by comparison, decompose in 120 days.

According to OliveGreen, CornWare’s distributor, sales have grown by 50 per centsince August when the product first appeared in supermarkets. The firm’s marketing executive, Noorfa’Izah Mohd Saad, said: “This is very encouraging for us, (a sign that) Singaporeans are open to the idea of eco-friendly products. They like that our forks and spoons are strong and don’t break so easily like how some plastic ones do.”

CornWare is available at NTUC (Finest & Xtra), Meidi-Ya, Mustafa, Carrefour (Suntec City), Cold Storage and Sheng Siong supermarkets.


Read more!

EU and Norway take first steps to save cod

Red-letter day for North Sea cod
WWF 11 Dec 08;

Brussels, Belgium – The European Union and Norway have taken the first step towards saving millions of tonnes of cod and other North Sea fish every year.

The EU-Norway fisheries agreement, reached after weeks of negotiation, sees the total allowable quota for cod in the North Sea increase by 30 per cent, on the condition that fishermen reduce the amount of “discard”, or unwanted fish thrown back in the sea either dead or dying.

Discard includes cod if the fisherman’s quota has been reached or if the fish is under-size, and other fish (bycatch) that may have been caught by accident.

Now though fishermen face mandatory use of eliminator trawls – a special type of net which allows cod to escape – and other selective gear when the quota is almost reached.

In addition, discard of fish above minimum landing size will be banned and closed areas during the spawning season introduced.

The European Union has finally committed to work on a complete ban on discard, already in force in the Norwegian Sea, within the upcoming reform of the Common Fisheries Policy in 2012.

“We welcome new rules to encourage more selective gear and closed areas during the spawning season,” said Aaron McLoughlin, Head of European Marine Programme at WWF. “The key point, though, is that these measures are enforced.

“A quota increase for cod based on less cod being removed from the sea and discarded needs fishermen and governments to work together to make sure rules are applied. Discard remains a problem and that needs to be a priority of the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy.”

WWF is urging the EU to make the use of selective gear like eliminator trawls mandatory all year round.

As far as other stocks in the agreement are concerned, WWF supports the reduction of quota by 13 per cent for plaice as it is in line with the scientific advice, but regrets that the advice to cut whiting quotas by 67 per cent was ignored in favour of a cut by only 15 per cent. According to the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES – a scientific body advising the EU) such a limited reduction won’t be enough to restore a fishery which suffers from excessive fishing mortality.

The agreed quotas for North Sea cod and related measures to reduce discards will be ratified by the EU Fisheries Ministers at the Council meeting on 18-19 December in Brussels.


Read more!

Study: Elephants live longer in wild than zoos

Randolph E. Schmid, Associated Press Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

"Protecting elephants in Africa and Asia is far more successful than protecting them in Western zoos."

WASHINGTON – Zoo elephants don't live as long as those in the wild, according to a study sure to stir debate about keeping the giant animals on display. Researchers compared the life spans of elephants in European zoos with those living in Amboseli National Park in Kenya and others working on a timber enterprise in Myanmar. Animals in the wild or in natural working conditions had life spans twice that or more of their relatives in zoos.

Animal care activists have campaigned in recent years to discourage keeping elephants in zoos, largely because of the lack of space and small numbers of animals that can be kept in a group. Debates have been especially vocal in Dallas and Los Angeles.

The researchers found that the median life span for African elephants in European zoos was 16.9 years, compared with 56 years for elephants who died of natural causes in Kenya's Amboseli park. Adding in those elephants killed by people in Africa lowered the median life span there to 35.9 years. Median means half died younger than that age and half lived longer.

For the more endangered Asian elephants, the median life span in European zoos was 18.9 years, compared with 41.7 years for those working in the Myanmar Timber Enterprise. Myanmar is the country formerly known as Burma.

There is some good news, though. The life spans of zoo elephants have improved in recent years, suggesting an improvement in their care and raising, said one of the report's authors, Georgia J. Mason of the animal sciences department at the University of Guelph, Canada.

But, she added, "protecting elephants in Africa and Asia is far more successful than protecting them in Western zoos."

There are about 1,200 elephants in zoos, half in Europe, Mason said in an interview via e-mail. She said researchers concentrated on female elephants, which make up 80 percent of the zoo population.

"One of our more amazing results" was that Asian elephants born in zoos have shorter life spans than do Asian elephants brought to the zoos from the wild, she added in a broadcast interview provided by the journal Science, which published the results in its Friday edition.

She noted that zoos usually lack have large grazing areas that elephants are used to in the wild, and that zoo animals often are alone or with one or two other unrelated animals, while in the wild they tend to live in related groups of eight to 12 animals.

In Asian elephants, infant mortality rates are two times to three times higher in zoos than in the Burmese logging camps, Mason said via e-mail. And then, in adulthood, zoo-born animals die prematurely.

"We're not sure why," she said.

The study confirms many of the findings of a similar 2002 analysis prepared by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. One of the authors of the new study, Ros Clubb, works for the society.

Steven Feldman, a spokesman for the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, contended the report did not reflect conditions in North America. In addition, he said, it is hard to compare conditions in zoos and in the wild. "Every event in a zoo is observed," he said, while scientists can study only a small number of events in nature.

The project, or individual researchers, received financial support from Canada's National Science and Engineering Research Council, Prospect Burma Foundation, Charles Wallace Burma Trust, Three Oaks Foundation, Whitney-Laing Foundation, Toyota Foundation, Fantham Memorial Research Scholarship and University College, London.

Among the researchers, Mason has served as a paid consultant to Disney's Animal Kingdom USA and one of authors, Khyne U. Mar, has been a paid consultant for Woburn Safari Park, about an hour north of London.


Read more!

Monterey Bay Aquarium: Helping or hurting Great White Sharks?

Great Whites on Display
Has Scientific Pursuit Put This Predator Back on the Market?

Alastair Bland, The Indpendent 9 Dec 08;

Four Southern California great white sharks have resided on display at the Monterey Bay Aquarium since 2004 — each in the Outer Bay exhibit for as long as six months before being released back into the wild. Aquarium spokespeople say the display program has benefited public perception of sharks everywhere and, ultimately, will boost interest and activism in preserving the ocean’s diminishing shark populations. However, five great whites have died in the hands of the Monterey Bay Aquarium since 2004, when the facility began acquiring juveniles entangled in the nets of certain boats and, consequently, critics have suggested that the aquarium is doing less for wild great whites than it is for its own box office sales.

Monterey Bay Aquarium spokesperson Ken Peterson claimed the display program “hasn’t been a big income generator,” adding that at least $500,000 of ticket sales revenue in recent years has funded studies of wild great whites, which are regularly captured off the California coast, fitted with transmitters, and surveyed remotely as they range about the eastern Pacific. Moreover, Peterson noted that seeing a live great white eye to eye is an immeasurably powerful experience for aquarium visitors. “By opening tens of thousands of people up to the experience and emotional connection with an animal that has been so vilified for so long, we believe we’re providing a net benefit to the species,” he said.

The exhibited great whites have been caught by fishers targeting halibut and white sea bass with nets — and by aquarium biologists with hook and line — in the waters just south of Santa Barbara, often on the productive halibut ground known as the Ventura Flats. Intentionally catching great whites in California has been illegal since 1994, when the California Department of Fish and Game banned recreational and commercial take. However, the state prohibition offers a stipulation: “If landed alive incidentally in set gill nets, drift gill nets, or round-haul nets, [great whites] may only be sold for scientific or live display purposes.” The Monterey Bay Aquarium holds the required paperwork to purchase and retain “incidentally” caught great whites.

But are these sharks truly being caught incidentally?

Commercial fishers who turn over great whites to science receive payment. According to one veteran commercial fisherman in the area, the Monterey Bay Aquarium offers fishers a stipend of $300 for a dead great white and $2,000 for a live specimen. The fisherman guessed he has sold as many as 10 great whites to the aquarium in recent years, including six in 2006. Two of that season’s sharks had died in the net, he says. (Several other area fishers did not return calls for this story.) Ironically, the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch program advises consumers to avoid halibut caught by gillnetters, citing the fishery as “unsustainable.” Yet the aquarium itself pays these very fishers to hand over a protected species.

Sean Van Sommeran, an independent shark researcher and founder of the Pelagic Shark Research Foundation, said he suspects that such a monetary reward system could motivate gillnetters to set their gear in places known to be frequented by juvenile great whites, such as the Ventura Flats, where sharks gather May through September. “If they’re paying these guys for sharks dead or alive, then the way I see it, that’s a commercial fishery for [great] white sharks,” said Van Sommeran, who was among the first Californians to urge the state to ban the killing of great whites in the early 1990s.

Many scientists, some involved with the Pelagic Shark Research Foundation, are also involved in studying the species.

Archived catch records from the California Department of Fish and Game, which requires that all commercial catch of all species be weighed and reported, show a dramatic increase in annual great white landings beginning in 2004, the year that the aquarium first displayed a live member of the species. Before then, landings were scant. In 1997, 258 pounds of great white were reported, all from the Los Angeles/Santa Barbara area. In 1998, 138 pounds were weighed. None were reported in 1999. The Santa Barbara area produced 149 pounds in 2000, while a fluke catch of a 1,700-pound adult came from Morro Bay. In 2001, 86 pounds — possibly two sharks — were caught in 2001, all from the Santa Barbara area. Records from 2002 and 2003 indicate zero great white landings statewide.

But in 2004, the reported landings of “incidentally” caught great whites jumped to 422 pounds. Subsequent annual landings of great whites came in at 410 pounds in 2005, 467 pounds in 2006, and 568 pounds in 2007 — all from local waters, where the juveniles gather in the shallows. In 2008, 18 great whites between 50 and 90 pounds were landed, tagged, and eventually released, according to Dr. Christopher Lowe, a Cal State, Long Beach marine biology professor who regularly handles the sharks entangled in nets. One of 2008’s great whites was shuttled to Monterey to the Outer Bay exhibit in late August, where it resided for 11 days before being returned to the ocean after its health deteriorated.

In spite of the dramatic increase in landings, area fisherman Ben Henke says he and other fishers never string their nets with the intent of catching great whites. “It’s pretty hard to target these fish,” he said. “They’re all incidentals. You probably couldn’t target one any better than if you just waited for one to come along.” Yet Henke and several other fishers catch great whites so reliably that, with the financial assistance of aquarium affiliates, they have installed live holding tanks on their vessels. The seawater-fed tanks can be used to contain live halibut, but the fisherman said the feature was installed on his boat largely for sharks.

The Monterey Bay Aquarium has also developed its own infrastructure for great whites. In 2002, it anchored a floating holding pen off of Point Dume, near Malibu, to contain netted sharks for study before deciding whether to send the fish to the Monterey Bay Aquarium or to tag and release them. The pen has been anchored there each summer since. A “rapid response team” of researchers with the Southern California Marine Institute and Cal State Long Beach — including Lowe — even stands by, waiting on the next call from a fisherman with an accidentally caught great white in his net.

Peterson, the aquarium spokesperson, concedes that fishers are paid for their great white-related services, but not enough to motivate anyone to intentionally wreck their nets with a live specimen. “We do compensate [the fishermen] for time lost fishing, but we’re really careful in communicating to them that there’s not some bounty out there for bringing in a [great] white shark,” Peterson explained.

John Ugoretz, a Department of Fish and Game biologist who reviews collection permit applications from scientific institutions, sees no reason to believe the Monterey Bay Aquarium is abusing its privilege. “We’re very keen on making sure that this isn’t just a display adventure for them and that they’re actually collecting valid information and knowledge,” he said.

Lowe and Peterson report that the information generated by the tagging program has been monumental. Of 39 sharks handled by the aquarium since its program began, most have been quickly put back in the water wearing transmitters, Peterson said. Some of these sharks were tracked on surprisingly extensive forays as far as the Sea of Cortez and outward toward Hawai‘i. Understanding the animals’ range of migration could help researchers improve their understanding of great white populations and help governments better manage and protect the fish.

In addition to the five sharks that have died in the hands of aquarium staff since 2004, the rapid response team has also acquired a total of nine dead great whites from the fishers, Lowe said, bringing what could be called the program’s “death toll” to 14 great whites. Yet Peterson claimed the sharks displayed in the Outer Bay tank have served as effective ambassadors for their entire species — something this maligned predator has rarely had before. “This is making an emotional impact between visitors and an animal that’s otherwise been demonized, and that gives us the opportunity to talk about the conservation of not just [great] white sharks but all sharks around the world,” said Peterson, who also noted that the aquarium will likely put another great white on display in summer 2009.

But Van Sommeran believes that science gains little when large pelagic animals are housed in tanks, an activity he has spoken against for years. “The public interest in these fish is already as high as it’s ever been, so the question is, ‘Is the shark on display to raise awareness? Or is it on display because awareness is high?’”

Other researchers have noted that — in spite of public enthusiasm for sharks, shark movies, and shark exhibits — the slaughter of wild sharks for fins, flesh, and wall mounts remains rampant. In the 1980s, after an undercover filmmaker took footage of commercial tuna fishers massacring hundreds of dolphins, the world reacted with outrage and activism. However, abundant primetime footage of fishers slicing the fins from live sharks before discarding the crippled fish back into the sea has not quite had the same effect. Wild sharks are 90 percent gone, say scientists, and still diners eat them in restaurants.

Van Sommeran even wonders if the effects of the Outer Bay shark exhibits could have a negative net effect on California great whites. “The aquarium says they’re promoting interest in protecting them, but [great] white sharks are already a protected species in California. Without the aquarium’s display program, there would be no one fishing for them. Anyone who did would be a poacher.”

Lowe believes the dramatically increased catch of juveniles since 2004 is not a sign of illegal fishing maneuvers but rather a reflection of a growing great white shark population. Still, neither he nor other researchers can estimate the size of this migratory fish’s population, and worldwide great white populations are generally assumed to be reduced from their natural levels — perhaps still shrinking. But Lowe believes the climate may be improving for great whites and their future growing brighter.

Whether sharks in a tank have anything to do with such a turnaround remains a question unanswered.


Read more!

Poaching May Erase Elephants From Chad Wildlife Park

Tasha Eichenseher, National Geographic News 11 Dec 08;

The elephant population in one of Central Africa's remaining wildlife strongholds may vanish within the next two to three years if poaching continues at current levels, according to conservationists who recently surveyed the park.

Researchers conducted two sample surveys this year of African elephant populations in Chad's Zakouma National Park. Both counts indicate that there may be just a thousand members of the species left in this 1,200-square-mile (3,100-square-kilometer) refuge.

That represents a significant decrease from 2005, when the population was estimated at 3,885. In 2006 conservationists counted 3,020 elephants.

After the 2006 census, nearly 120 elephant carcasses leftover from ivory poaching were discovered in herds in and around park.

Because some elephants leave Zakouma during their winter migration, the 2008 numbers—from both the Chadian government, in conjunction with the European Union, and the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS)—are rough estimates. WCS will conduct a full census next spring, when elephants have migrated back to the park and its replenished water sources.

But the organization's director for Africa programs, James Deutsch, said he expects the worst.

"A thousand is our best educated guess," Deutsch said. "It would be pretty surprising if the number was above 1,500."

Increased Poaching

WCS biologist and National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence J. Michael Fay points the finger at illegal poaching, which he says has intensified in and around Zakouma since 2005 due, in part, to the increased acceptability of and access to the global ivory trade.

The 2008 population estimates are based, in part, on reports of poaching and the discovery of at least 300 elephant carcasses.

"What we do know [now], is that we have an enormous poaching problem that didn't exist two years ago," Fay said.

Fay helped conduct the 2006 census with partial funding from the National Geographic Society's Expeditions Council. (The National Geographic Society owns National Geographic News.)

"Even if you are looking at the most optimistic estimates [closer to 2,000 left], that means your elephants will last three years [if poaching continues at current rates], which is catastrophic," Fay added.

"There is a massacre going on, unless something drastic happens."

To the chagrin of many conservationists, the first officially sanctioned ivory trade in a decade happened in October. The U.N. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) allowed Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe to sell 108 tons of government ivory stock to Chinese and Japanese buyers.

"Just in the past two years, the world thinks it is okay to buy ivory again," Fay said. "Anyone who thinks you can control ivory on the market is dreaming."

CITES officials argue that there is no proven connection between controlled sales and increased poaching.

"In fact, levels of illegal ivory trade decreased in the two years following the first one-off sale [in 1999]," CITES spokesperson Juan-Carlos Vasquez said in an email.

"Poaching levels appear to be more closely related to governance problems and political instability in certain regions of the continent … ."

Protective Measures

After the 2006 survey and graphic images of the slaughtered elephants captured global attention, Chad's president burned ivory stocks and donated armed trucks to the park for poaching patrols.

But political turmoil last year and a change in park guard complicated the situation, making it more difficult to monitor wildlife, Fay said.

2007 was the worst year on record for poaching, according to WCS pilot Darren Potgieter, who conducts the sample surveys and censuses via park flyovers.

"It was all-out war," he said. "We lost five guards and one army lieutenant, compared with six guards and two regular employees in the preceding 16 years, and hundreds of elephants."

The good news, according to Fay, is that since May 2008, WCS and the Chadian government have been able to make daily flyovers with a newly designated anti-poaching patrol plane. Guard forces are also increasing, with help from the Chadian Army.

"Already … this aircraft has helped the park guard force to locate poached elephants and poachers," Fay said. "We are optimistic that with increased armed protection we can keep a lid on the poaching this year."


Read more!

Norway announces sharply lower whaling quota for 2009

Yahoo News 11 Dec 08;

OSLO (AFP) – Norway on Thursday authorised its whalers to harpoon 885 minke whales in 2009, a quota sharply down from previous years in what animal rights activists saw as a sign of consumers' growing disinterest for whale meat.

For the period 2006-2008, the quota was 1,052 minke whales per year but whalers fell short each year, killing around half the allowed number, according to environmental group Greenpeace.

"The quota is a little lower than in 2008. This is linked to the fact that in 2009, we will be launching a new (stocks) management programme, in which unused quotas can no longer be transferred from one year to another," the Norwegian Fisheries Directorate said in a statement.

The quota of 885 whales will be applied each year until 2013, the directorate said.

Whalers attribute the low catch numbers to an inadequate geographical distribution of the quotas, soaring fuel prices, difficult weather conditions and a crunch in processing and distribution channels.

In 2009, 750 minke whales can be harpooned along the Norwegian coasts and around the Svalbard archipelago in the Arctic, whalers' two preferred zones.

The rest of the quota must be hunted around the Jan Mayen island, located much further from the coast.

According to Greenpeace, the whalers' difficulties in filling the quota illustrates the lack of interest for whale meat.

"Despite marketing campaigns for whale meat, there are no indications that the demand for whale meat is going anywhere other than down," the organisation said.

"The government's adherence to whaling is pure symbolic politics, giving the appearance of supporting embattled coastal communities on a high profile issue," it added.

Apart from Iceland, Norway is the only country to authorise commercial whaling despite an international ban in place since 1986.


Read more!

Bush revises protections for endangered species

Dina Cappiello, Associated Press Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

WASHINGTON – Just six weeks before President-elect Barack Obama takes office, the Bush administration issued revised endangered species regulations Thursday to reduce the input of federal scientists and to block the law from being used to fight global warming.

The changes, which will go into effect in about 30 days, were completed in just four months. But they could take Obama much longer to reverse.

They will eliminate some of the mandatory, independent reviews that government scientists have performed for 35 years on dams, power plants, timber sales and other projects, a step that developers and other federal agencies have blamed for delays and cost increases.

The rules also prohibit federal agencies from evaluating the effect on endangered species and the places they live from a project's contribution to increased global warming.

Interior Department officials described the changes as "narrow," but admitted that the regulations were controversial inside the agency. Environmentalists viewed them as eroding the protections for endangered species.

Interior officials said federal agencies could still seek the expertise of federal wildlife biologists on a voluntary basis, and that other parts of the law will ensure that species are protected.

"Nothing in this regulation relieves a federal agency of its responsibilities to ensure that species are not harmed," said Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne in a conference call with reporters.

Current rules require biologists in the Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service to sign off on projects even when it is determined that they are not likely to harm species. The rule finalized Thursday would do away with that requirement, reducing the number of consultations so that the government's experts can focus on cases that pose the greatest harm to wildlife, officials said.

But environmentalists said that the rule changes would put decisions about endangered species into the hands of agencies with a vested interest in advancing a project and with little expertise about wildlife. Several environmental groups filed a lawsuit in federal court in San Francisco hours after the rule's announcement.

Jamie Rappaport Clark, a former director of the Fish and Wildlife Service and a vice president of Defenders of Wildlife, said Thursday that the changes target the "absolute heart of the Endangered Species Act." Clark told a House hearing on the Bush administration's last-minute environmental regulations that these changes remove "a system of checks and balances that provides an essential safety net for imperiled animals and plants."

Between 1998 and 2002, the Fish and Wildlife Service conducted 300,000 consultations. The National Marine Fisheries Service, which evaluates projects affecting marine species, conducts about 1,300 reviews each year.

The reviews have helped safeguard protected species such as bald eagles, Florida panthers and whooping cranes. A federal government handbook from 1998 described the consultations as "some of the most valuable and powerful tools to conserve listed species."

The Bush administration worked diligently to get the change in place before Obama took over, corralling 15 experts in Washington in October to sort through 250,000 written comments from the public on the revisions in 32 hours.

Obama has said he would work to reverse the changes. But because the rule takes effect before he is sworn in, he would have to restart the lengthy rulemaking process. House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., said he would seek to overturn the regulations using the Congressional Review Act after consulting with other Democratic leaders. The rarely used law allows Congress to review new federal regulations.

Congress has opposed similar changes to the endangered species protections in the past.

In 2003, the Bush administration imposed similar rules that would have allowed agencies to approve new pesticides and wildfire reduction projects without seeking the opinion of government scientists. The pesticide rule was later overturned in court. The Interior Department, along with the Forest Service, is currently being sued over the rule governing wildfire prevention.

In 2005, the House passed a bill that would have made similar changes to the Endangered Species Act, but the bill died in the Senate.

Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, the leading Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works committee, said in a written statement Thursday the new regulations were "commensense changes to a law much overdue for reform."

There are a handful of other environmental regulations still pending before Bush leaves office, including a rule to exempt large agricultural operations from reporting releases of ammonia and other hazardous air pollutants. They must be finalized by Dec. 19 in order for them go into effect before Jan. 20.

In a related development, the Interior Department also finalized Thursday a special rule for the polar bear, a species that was listed as threatened in May because of global warming. The rule would allow oil and gas exploration in areas where the bears live, as long as the companies comply with the Marine Mammal Protection Act.


Read more!

How Crazy Ideas Could Power the Future

Michael Schirber, livescience.com 11 Dec 08;

Editor's Note: Each Wednesday LiveScience examines the viability of emerging energy technologies - the power of the future.

A lucrative contest is on to find the next crazy green idea that may revolutionize the way we consume energy. Meanwhile, lots of not-so-crazy green ideas are just waiting to be implemented.

First off, the video contest called "What's Your Crazy Green Idea?" is looking for a theme for the next X Prize in energy and the environment.

"We recognized that we don't have all of the answers, and wanted to reach out to the people that a prize in energy and the environment would affect and find out their ideas for what we should be focusing on," said Sarah Evans, vice president of communications for the X Prize Foundation.

Contestants submitted their two-minute videos on YouTube. The winner will get $25,000, and their idea will be developed into a million-dollar competition to spur green innovation.

But why focus on "crazy" solutions?

"The day before something is a breakthrough, it's a crazy idea," Evans said. "We haven't yet had a major breakthrough in green technology yet, so all of the ideas challenge the current conceptions of energy production."

However, some would say that major breakthroughs are not entirely necessary. Wind turbines and hybrids and energy conservation are already here.

A contest within a contest

The video submissions to "What's Your Crazy Green Idea?" ranged from creating microalgae farms to harnessing the power of time travel.

"We were inspired by the sheer number of ideas and inquiries from the YouTube community," said Peter Diamandis, chairman and CEO of the X Prize Foundation, in a press release.

Of 133 videos, three were selected on the bases of creativity, viability, revolutionary impact, innovation and inventiveness, Evans said.

* "Energy X PRIZE: Reduce Home Energy Usage," by Jonathan Dreher of Cambridge, Mass. A prize to reduce the home energy consumption of American communities.
* "The Energy Independence X PRIZE," by Alan Silva of Roy, Utah. A prize to develop energy-independent homes that exist completely off the grid.
* "The Capacitor Challenge," by Kyle Good of Irvine, Calif. A prize to develop a new storage medium, an "ultra-capacitor."

The public was given the chance to vote on these three finalists, and more than 4,000 votes were cast. The winner will be announced in January, and an X Prize will be set up around the chosen theme.

"If something can be done easily, it isn't right for an X Prize, or if it's too hard, people won't want to compete, or the public will lose interest," Evans said. "We try to design prizes that can be won in between 3 and 8 years."

Stabilization wedges

Some have argued that a focus on future technology puts off solving environmental problems now.

In 2004, Princeton scientists Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow published a paper in the journal Science, claiming that a number of existing strategies, what they called "stabilization wedges," could bring greenhouse gas emissions under control.

"Humanity already possesses the fundamental scientific, technical, and industrial know-how to solve the carbon and climate problem for the next half-century," wrote the authors. "It is important not to become beguiled by the possibility of revolutionary technology."

Pacala and Socolow were responding to statements by the U.S. government that the climate problem requires entirely new technology.

"We, of course, can benefit from fundamental research and must never inhibit blue-sky thinking," Socolow told LiveScience.

He thinks radical solutions and aggressive deployment of available technology can enhance each other.

Revolution through competition

Radical solutions are what the X Prize Foundation hopes to get with its competitions.

"X Prizes function to stimulate breakthroughs," Evans said.

Previous contests have focused on commercial space travel, lunar landers and green cars. Even if existing green technologies can stabilize CO2 emissions, ideas are still needed on how best to utilize them.

"The reason we were looking for 'Crazy Green Ideas' is because we did not simply want the standard 'use more solar power' answer," Evans said. "X Prizes exist at the intersection of audacity and achievability, so the ideas need to be just outside of the bounds of what is currently possible."


Read more!

Companies could buy areas of rainforest in return for being allowed to pollute

Companies could effectively buy areas of rainforest to protect them from destruction in return for being allowed to pollute after the UK brokered a groundbreaking deal on deforestation.

Louise Gray, The Telegraph 11 Dec 08;

The destruction of the world's rainforests is currently responsible for a fifth of the world's carbon emissions and that is set to get worse according to the Met Office.

The problem is a core part of negotiations going on at the UN Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland, this week to try to halt global warming.

Delegates want to find a way to help poorer nations to protect the rainforests so that the whole world can benefit from the role the forests play in absorbing carbon, releasing oxygen and ultimately regulating the climate.

Several leading figures including Prince Charles and Johan Eliasch, Gordon Brown's special advisor on deforestation, have suggested paying poorer nations not to cut down trees.

One way of doing this is to use the money raised from taxing heavy industries for polluting through "carbon markets" to fund projects to halt deforestation.

Companies could pay millions of pounds for 'rainforest bonds' that would ensure certain areas were given protection.

In a ground-breaking move that will bring the world closer to achieving this, the UK is to sign a mission statement with more than a dozen other countries including rainforest nations in South America, South East Asia and Africa.

The deal is the first time in the world rainforests states have worked with richer nations to measure the amount of carbon dioxide released by chopping down trees, therefore paving the way for a system of payments for halting deforestation.

The UK has also pledged £100 million towards deforestation in a signal of how seriously the Government is taking the issue.

Ed Miliband, the climate change secretary, said the UK is in favour of finding a way to halt deforestation through the carbon markets – as long as the sovereignty of rainforest nations is respected.

"If the global carbon markets can be used to give rainforest countries an incentive to reduce their deforestation rates then that is the big potential prize," he said.

However, Tom Picken, of Friends of the Earth, warned the move could fund corrupt Governments, disempower indigenous forest peoples and give developed countries an excuse to carry on polluting.

"If the forest carbon trading scheme goes ahead then we won't be able to meet the emissions reductions needed to avoid catastrophic climate change," he warned.

"We cannot do one or the other – halt deforestation or reduce pollution - we have to do both."

So far the negotiations to move the world towards a deal on climate change have been a "disappointment", according to environmental groups.

They are particularly disappointed in the EU for failing to agree on tough targets to cut carbon emissions, while the US remains a "lame duck" without any firm commitments from President elect Barack Obama.

Britain to give tropical countries £100m to protect rainforest
Investment in Brazil and Papua New Guinea directly benefits British by tackling climate change, says Ed Miliband

David Adam, guardian.co.uk 12 Dec 08;

Britain is to channel £100m to tropical countries such as Brazil and Papua New Guinea to help protect vulnerable forests and tackle climate change, ministers will announce today.

The investment could help developing nations access billions of pounds of funding under a new UN scheme to extend carbon trading to forests.

The UN scheme, the so-called Redd initiative, will reward tropical countries that slow deforestation with lucrative carbon credits. The credits would be bought by rich nations that need to meet targets on cuts in emissions. It is expected to form part of a new global treaty on fighting climate change to be agreed next year at a key meeting in Copenhagen.

One obstacle is the lack of accurate measurements from tropical nations on how much carbon is locked in the trees.. Another difficulty is how the promised reductions in emissions could be verified. The British move aims to help develop systems to accurately measure, verify and report such savings.

Speaking at UN climate talks in Poznan, Poland, Ed Miliband, energy and climate change secretary, said: "The money we're putting forward is to hasten action with regards to deforestation, and looking at how the global carbon market can be used to help give an incentive to forest countries to reduce their rates of deforestation."

Land use change and deforestation produce 17% of all greenhouse gas emissions, and protecting forests was identified in the Stern review as a relatively cheap way to tackle global warming.

Miliband said it was a good move for Britain to hand over the money, despite the current economic problems.

"If we don't do something on global deforestation, then events that I saw in my constituency [Doncaster] a year ago, with terrible flooding, will happen more often," he said. "There is a direct social and economic interest in this for people in Britain as well as the moral interest in saving the planet."

Ban Ki-moon, UN secretary-general also told the conference economic gloom was no excuse for inaction: "There can be no backsliding on our commitments to a future of low-carbon emissions. Yes, the economic crisis is serious. Yet when it comes to climate change, the stakes are far higher. The climate crisis affects our potential prosperity and peoples' lives, both now and far into the future."

The pledged £100m is part of an overall £800m funding package for international environmental projects announced last year. The money, together with donations from other developed countries including France Germany and Norway, will be held and allocated by the World Bank. Britain already funds similar efforts in the Congo basin.

Douglas Alexander, international development secretary, said: "The funding we have announced today will support activities in developing countries such as enabling farmers to make a living in ways that mean they don't have to cut down more forests. Our funding will back the vital steps we hope to see in these talks towards achieving a climate change agreement that's fair for all."

The Poznan talks, which aim to set the stage for agreeing in Copenhagen a successor to the Kyoto deal, have made little progress on deciding how the Redd scheme could be introduced. Discussions are continuing, for example, on whether the carbon credit rewards should be based on national forestry levels, or on a project-by-project basis.

Campaigners are lobbying ministers to restore a reference to the rights of indigenous forest peoples in the scheme, which was removed by a group of countries including the US and Australia.

There has also been little progress on unlocking £150m in a separate World Bank fund intended to help developing countries adapt to the effects of climate change. Insiders say the talks are bogged down in legal issues over how countries would access the money. Making this fund operational had been one of the few concrete decisions expected at Poznan.

British officials say the conference must now shift the search for a new global climate deal from idea sharing to a formal negotiating mode. That switch is expected to be confirmed tonight. Negotiators are reluctant to discuss detailed goals until Barack Obama signals his intentions on climate change next year.


Read more!

'Consensus emerging' on climate deal at EU summit

Paul Harrington Yahoo News 12 Dec 08;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – European Union leaders looked poised Thursday to seal agreement on a package to fight global warming after concessions to nations concerned over the cost to industry during recession.

Italy's Silvio Berlusconi, one of the fiercest opponents of the proposals that had been on the table, withdrew his veto threat after several hours of negotiations as sources at an EU summit said a consensus was now emerging.

"We are heading for a compromise," the Italian prime minister told reporters on the margins of an EU summit in Brussels. "Italy is on the way to getting all it wants."

Diplomatic and EU sources had earlier said that French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the summit's host, had made a series of compromises designed to buy off opposition by countries including Italy, Poland and Hungary.

Although Britain and others had voiced concerns that too many concessions had been made, hopes grew that an agreement would be reached before the end of the two-day summit on Friday.

"A consensus is starting to emerge and an agreement is quite probable tomorrow," one EU official said on the condition of the anonymity.

The EU's so-called 20-20-20 plan sets three targets for 2020: a 20 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20 percent cut in energy consumed and 20 percent use of renewable energy.

But several nations, led by Germany, Italy and Poland, have opposed the plans to achieve those targets, fearing the effect on their industries and jobs in a time of recession.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, had said earlier in the week that she would not endorse any deal that jeopardised German investment or jobs with the continent's biggest economy now in recession.

But Merkel, who was the initial package's chief architect before Germany became affected by the global economic slowdown, merely said on arrival that she expected "difficult negotiations" in the hours ahead.

Poland and its fellow eastern European nations are seeking special treatment as they are heavily reliant on high-polluting coal for their energy.

The fresh proposals suggested a new mechanism for sharing out CO2 quotas, with Poland and Romania getting a special allocation of 12 percent against the previously suggested 10 percent.

The energy sectors of heavily coal-dependent nations would also receive some free emissions allowances until 2019 under the plan.

A Polish government source said that Warsaw was now happy with the package on offer.

Poland "has achieved all its objectives," the source said.

"Europe must not provide the spectacle of its own division," said Sarkozy before going into the closed-door meetings.

Environmental group Greenpeace swiftly slammed the new concessions.

"We risk a lock-in in an expensive and polluting fossil-fuel economy," said Greenpeace Europe director Joris den Blanken.

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, attending UN climate talks in Poland, said the outcome of the two-day summit in Brussels holds "great consequences for the whole world".

"We look for leadership from the European Union," he said.

The EU hopes to come to international talks on global warming in Copenhagen next December with a strong, unified line on climate change as a model for the rest of the world.

Europe's overall objective is to keep global warming to two degrees centigrade above pre-industrial levels.

EU Leaders Mull Softer Climate Action Amid Crisis
Pete Harrison and Darren Ennis, PlanetArk 12 Dec 08;

BRUSSELS - European leaders sought to ease the shock for heavy industry on Thursday by watering down plans to tackle climate change in the midst of an economic crisis.

The European Union hopes to agree ways of cutting carbon dioxide to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, heeding warnings of stormier weather and rising sea levels.

Having already struck deals in recent weeks to promote green energy and curb emissions from cars, the focus has switched to the most contentious issues -- power generators, heavy industry and manufacturing.

"We are going to get a historic decision," said Finnish foreign minister Alexander Stubb. "Europe is going to show the way on energy and climate change."

The talks assume a greater importance coming as they do just over a month before Barack Obama assumes the U.S. presidency. Many in Europe expect closer co-operation with an Obama administration on such issues as climate change than was achieved with incumbent George W. Bush.

Several leaders stressed the need to maintain the EU's ambitious targets, but German Chancellor Angela Merkel appeared to have secured an early win for industry.

Steel, cement, chemicals, paper and other industries will be sheltered from the added cost of buying permits to emit CO2 from the EU's flagship emissions trading scheme (ETS), according to a draft text that formed the basis for negotiations.

"This covers about 90 percent of industry, and I don't see any reason why Germany would not accept this proposal," German conservative Peter Liese told Reuters. "I see it as a victory."

But critics said that handing out pollution permits for free removed the main incentive for emissions cuts.

"Allocating such a large proportion of emissions permits for free...would turn the ETS into a windfall profit machine for Europe's most polluting industries," said Green group member Caroline Lucas.

SOLIDARITY

Merkel and Italian President Silvio Berlusconi have fought successfully in recent weeks to protect businesses and their powerful auto sectors. But Berlusconi still dangled the threat of vetoing any deal.

Once industry has been dealt with, negotiations will switch to bargaining with eastern European states over how much money they need to accept a deal that will punish their power sectors.

Proposals to make power generators pay for permits to pollute from 2013 are aimed at making the dirtiest plants uneconomical, but that has caused alarm in Poland, which gets over 90 percent of its power from highly polluting coal.

Poland's battle led to proposals in the draft that its power sector could be handed opt-outs, along with the power sectors of other big coal users, island nations and the Baltic states, which are poorly connected to the EU power grid.

But Germany created friction by countering that should be matched with free permits for its own new, cleaner coal plants.

Along with opt-outs, eastern European states are also demanding a boost to a 7.5 billion euros "solidarity fund" designed to help replace coal with green energy and nuclear.

Britain has so far put up stiff resistance to any further handouts, while Germany wants it to be part of EU budget talks.

"It's all at the expense of the western countries so it will be very difficult to negotiate an increase of even 1 percent," said a Bulgarian government official.

A successful deal this week is seen as vital to catalyze global talks on cutting greenhouse gases from other big emitters such as Russia, China, India and the United States.

"If we fail to reach an agreement at this summit, it will be disastrous for climate negotiations next year," said Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

(Additional reporting by Anna Mudeva, Huw Jones, Ilona Wissenbach, Ingrid Melander and Marcin Grajewski)


Read more!

Ban sees UN climate summit, calls for 'Green New Deal'

Simon Sturdee Yahoo News 11 Dec 08;

POZNAN, Poland (AFP) – UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Thursday said he may stage a summit to spur a treaty on climate change as he called for a "Green New Deal" that would both curb global warming and salvage the world economy.

"I'm considering convening a summit-level meeting focussed on climate change at the time of the General Assembly in September," the UN secretary general told reporters on the sidelines of the UN climate talks in Poznan.

Holding the summit would depend on progress in talks to craft a worldwide pact, by December 2009, for stopping the juggernaut of global warming, he indicated.

In a speech earlier, Ban said the world needed "a Green New Deal."

"This is a deal that works for all nations, rich as well as poor. Let us save ourselves from catastrophe and usher in a truly sustainable world."

He argued that "a big part" of the massive stimulus to solve the economic crisis should be devoted to investing in a low-carbon economy -- "an investment that fights climate change, creates millions of green jobs and spurs green growth".

Ban made the keynote speech to start a two-day ministerial level meeting in Poznan, Poland, which wraps up 12 days of talks under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

He praised new environmental plans by China and US president-elect Barack Obama and appealed to heads of the European Union (EU), locking horns over their own climate pact, to show "leadership".

Negotiations among the 192-member UNFCCC are mid-way through the two-year "roadmap" set down on the Indonesian island of Bali last year.

In Poznan, the talks are meant to provide the outlines of a negotiation blueprint. Throughout 2009, further haggling will take place with the aim of fleshing out a deal that can be signed in Copenhagen next December.

But the more than 11,500 delegates in Poland kept a worried eye on Thursday on events in Brussels, where EU leaders were hunkered down on the first day of a two-day summit tasked with forging the bloc's own climate pact.

The EU programme sets down the most ambitious goals of any advanced economy, including 20 percent fewer greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared with 1990 levels, increased use of renewable energy sources and overall energy savings.

But several countries are playing tough, most notably those in the former Soviet bloc that are highly dependent on heavily polluting coal power, as well as Germany and Italy worried about the loss of jobs.

The envisioned Copenhagen treaty will amount to an action plan for curbing greenhouse gases and channelling help for vulnerable countries beyond 2012, when current provisions expire under the UNFCCC's Kyoto Protocol.

It is designed to be the most complex and far-reaching environment deal ever struck -- as it has to be, scientists say.

Studies say climate change is happening and its eventual impact may be even worse than thought, creating human misery on a massive scale as deserts expand, sea levels rise and extreme weather becomes more and more frequent.

But cobbling together a global deal is a tall order, with the complex discussions in Poznan centered on how to share out the commitments and costs of cutting the carbon pollution that stokes global warming.

Rich countries acknowledge their historic role in pushing up global temperatures but they say emerging powers like China and India must also take action.

Developing and poorer nations hit back with the argument that the industrialised world should lead by example, and foot the bill for clean-energy technology and coping with the impact of global warming.

Delegates have complained that making progress in Poznan is difficult while the world waits for Barack Obama to take office as US president on January 20.

But Senator John Kerry, present in Poznan and tasked with reporting back to Obama, said that the United States was "determined to rejoin the world community" on climate change and would lead by example with mandatory emissions caps.

"The way to meet the goal in Copenhagen is to have heads of state pick up this challenge and attempt to meet it. I am confident that president-elect Obama intends to do that," Kerry said.

U.N. Chief Tells World: We Need A Green New Deal
Gabriela Baczynska and Megan Rowling, Reuters 12 Dec 08;

POZNAN - The world must avoid backsliding in fighting global warming and work out a "Green New Deal" to fix its twin climate and economic crises, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday.

"We must re-commit ourselves to the urgency of our cause," Ban told a December 1-12 meeting of 100 environment ministers in Poznan, Poland, reviewing progress toward a new U.N. climate treaty meant to be agreed at the end of 2009.

"The financial crisis cannot be an excuse for inaction or for backsliding on your commitments," he told ministers. The climate crisis "affects our potential prosperity and peoples' lives, both now and far into the future."

Ban called for leadership from U.S. President-elect Barack Obama and from the European Union. An EU summit ending on Friday will try to break deadlock in the bloc over a plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by a fifth by 2020, compared to 1990.

And Ban called for a modern, global environmental equivalent of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt's 1930s "New Deal," which lifted the United States out of the Great Depression.

"We need a Green New Deal," Ban declared.

Coping with the financial crisis would need a "massive stimulus," he added. "A big part of that spending should be an investment -- an investment in a green future."

The U.N. Climate Panel says global warming from greenhouse gases, mainly generated from burning fossil fuels, will cause more floods, droughts, heatwaves and rising seas.

The Poznan talks are the halfway mark of a two-year push to work out a global pact to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, the U.N. pact binding 37 nations to reduce emissions by about 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-2012.

Ban also said he was considering calling a summit of world leaders in New York in September 2009 to give impetus to climate talks due to end at a conference in Copenhagen in a year's time.

LEADERSHIP

John Kerry, designated head of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Obama would invest heavily in renewable energies and "green jobs" to help end the recession.

"President Obama will be like night and day compared to President Bush," he told reporters of Obama's climate policies.

Obama wants to cut U.S. emissions, now running 17 percent above 1990 levels, back to those levels by 2020. Bush rejected the Kyoto Protocol and his laxer policies would allow U.S. emissions to keep rising until 2025.

Kerry said it was "absolutely essential" that China, which has overtaken the United States as the world's top carbon dioxide emitter, gets more involved in combating global warming to win U.S. endorsement of any new treaty.

But developing nations, led by China and India, insist that rich nations should first make deep cuts.

Details of a new Adaptation Fund to help poor countries adjust to the impacts of rising seas, droughts, floods and heatwaves were among the most contentious remaining issues.

Tuvalu's Prime Minister Apisai Ielemia, whose Pacific island nation is at risk from rising seas, accused some rich countries of "burying us in red tape" to deny access to the fund.

"We are not contemplating migration ... we will survive," Ielemia said to applause from delegates. The Adaptation Fund could reach $300 million a year by 2012 to help countries build coastal defenses or develop drought-resistant crops.

The U.N. Climate Change Secretariat said the Polish talks had achieved the modest goals of agreeing a plan of work toward Copenhagen. Negotiators will hold three preparatory meetings in 2009.

"This is a blue-collar conference," said Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat. "It's about getting a job done, it's not about spectacles or breakthroughs."

(Editing by Andrew Roche)


Read more!