Best of our wild blogs: 4 Jan 10

Announcing the new Celebrating Singapore's Biodiversity blog and Facebook page.

A not so lively Changi Beach on New Year's eve
from The Simplicities in Life

Changi Beach
from encounters with nature

Fig snail!
from Half a Bunny and the Salmon of Doubt

Pink Moth
from Urban Forest

bioluminescent anemone @ little sisters island
from sgbeachbum

Little Sisters with Bigs and Smalls
from Psychedelic Nature and Singapore Nature and wild shores of singapore.

On mini-hiatus
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Brown Hawk Owl joins in a badminton game
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Gone: a look at extinction over the past decade
from Mongabay.com news


Read more!

Bird sellers see their wings clipped

These shops are hurting from dwindling interest in keeping birds as pets
Kimberly Spykerman & Lester Kok, Straits Times 4 Jan 10;

THE bird business is going to the dogs. From 81 shops here selling birds five years ago, there are just 53 left.

Bird shop owners have flown the coop, as interest in acquiring songbirds dwindles among the younger set, who prefer other pets such as dogs and cats.

Mr Frankie Low, 62, knows this only too well. Some of the birds in his Bedok Reservoir shop, Hao Wang Trading, have been there for more than a year.

He is lucky to sell a bird in a month these days, compared with the 10 to 20 that would fly off his shelves when he first started business in 1995.

The bird business is dominated by the elderly, some of whom have been selling these feathered pets for more than 20 years. Customers are elderly people, too, who want birds for company or to enter them in singing competitions.

The 61-year-old owner of ABC Birds Centre in Bukit Merah Lane, who gave his name only as Mr Ng, said he has to feed his 500 birds from his own pocket because business is so bad.

He declined to reveal how many birds he sells each month, but said he is 'struggling' to cope with the monthly payments.

Besides the $3,000 monthly rent, he also spends $500 on fruit and seeds for the birds. 'It's important to feed the birds well, and keep them clean so that they won't get any diseases,' Mr Ng said.

The 58-year-old owner of Clementi Bird's Centre, who wanted to be known only as Mr Koh, is going to close shop after over 30 years of operation.

'There is no point in continuing the business when it barely gives me a salary,' he said.

Even younger owners are thinking of calling it quits. Mr Tan, a 30-year-old who started his first shop eight years ago, said he used to sell 30 to 40 birds a month.

Now his two shops sell half that number. 'Business is still sustainable, but if it gets worse, I might switch trade,' he said in Mandarin.

Bird shop owners blame the younger generation's lack of interest in keeping birds as pets.

Then, there is the cost: Songbirds like the Mata Puteh and China Finch can cost as much as $300 - more if they have good singing voices. But budgies or canaries can go for as little as $30 or $40.

There is also the fear of contracting disease. After the bird flu outbreak in 2005, bird imports dropped from 190,000 to 79,000 in 2006.

Since 2006, there have also been restrictions on the import of birds from HPAI-affected (Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza) countries.

Imports from countries such as Thailand, China, Indonesia and Malaysia - where popular birds such as the Hwamei and the Oriental White-eye originate - are now restricted.

Bird lovers who hang round bird shops such as Mr Su Ah Koon, 56, said it is sad that bird stores are closing down. 'I myself have two birds, so now that I'm not working, I have a lot of time to spend with them,' the retiree said in Mandarin.

'For the younger people, they now have other interests such as computers and movies, and they don't have the interest in listening to birds singing.'

But Mr Chua Kah Soon, 46, owner of Goodwill Birds Trading, feels things are not that grim.

He said his store at Serangoon North Avenue 2 is still seeing brisk business, even after 20 years. 'Asian people like to keep songbirds because the birds can keep them company at the coffee shops,' he said.

Parrots and parakeets are growing more popular these days, he said. 'Parrots are easier to bond and communicate with as they are considered smarter birds. Our customers are also getting more educated about birds from the regular bird gatherings, so perhaps that is another reason why they are popular.'

One of the younger bird owners, civil servant Eric Neo, 33, bought a $380 baby parrot recently.

'Some people like dogs, some like cats, but for me, I just like birds,' he said. 'The parrots are very pretty and some of them can learn to talk.'

A large number of Goodwill's customers are in their mid to late 20s, unlike those at other bird shops, which are mainly patronised by senior citizens. Goodwill's youngest customer is aged 12.

Mr Chua's older brother, Mr Chua Thiam Chuan, who runs Chua's Pets Trading a block away, said he also has younger clients.

But he said the bulk of his bird shop business is the import and export of birds.

'Singapore's AVA ( Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore) is very strict in regulations, so other countries trust us to export birds to them,' said the older Mr Chua, who has been in the industry for more than 30 years.

'Those bird shops which only sell small birds locally, and don't do import and export, will find it hard to survive.'

Chua's Pets Trading, together with Goodwill, and a few other pet shops in Serangoon, are trying to revive the bird industry by hosting bird singing competitions and exhibitions.

One was held at Serangoon Community Club on Dec 20. About 1,000 people turned up.

Mr Patrick Ong, chairman of the Pets Community @ The Serangoon, said the Bird Carnival was organised to raise awareness and appreciation of birds.

'We hope to continue our mission to educate the public about keeping pets and bridging races and cultures through pets,' he said.


Read more!

The electric car is revving up

Michael Richardson, for the Straits Times 4 Jan 10;

IS 2010 the start of a new era in road transport as electricity increasingly takes over from petrol and diesel as the source of power for cars and other vehicles, reducing global warming emissions and dependence on foreign oil?

Some signs are certainly promising in established motor vehicle markets in the United States and Europe, as well as in Asia, where demand for cars is growing fastest.

If small, low-cost electric vehicles catch on in Asia, their success is likely to be assured and global demand for oil in future will be less than forecast.

General Motors (GM) of the US and India's Reva Electric will begin joint production of a 'highly affordable' battery-powered car in India in the second half of this year, while China is actively promoting production of both electricity-powered vehicles and the batteries that store their on-board electricity.

Such vehicles range from all-electric models to the more widely available hybrids like those from Japanese manufacturers Toyota and Honda that use rechargeable battery power and petrol engines.

Nearly all the major carmakers are now committed to producing hybrid or all-electric cars, or both. They are betting that cheap oil is a thing of the past, and that governments will raise taxes on fossil fuels and curb carbon emissions, despite the recent failure of the Copenhagen climate change negotiations.

GM is due to launch its Chevrolet Volt in the US and Europe later this year. The Volt, to be sold in Europe as the Ampera, is a new hybrid design in which the wheels are driven only by the electric motor. A petrol engine generates more electricity to extend the car's range if needed, but the batteries are mainly recharged by plugging into an electric power source.

France's PSA Peugeot Citroen says it will be the first carmaker to market a full range of electric vehicles in Europe, from small city runarounds to more spacious saloons, when it starts selling the cars this year. Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz are developing luxury battery-powered models.

The keenest advocate of all-electric cars, however, is Japan's second biggest carmaker, Nissan, and its French parent, Renault. They are making a huge investment in a family of four electric models to be launched next year and in 2012. They are also investing heavily in the production of batteries for the cars.

Singapore is launching its three-year, $20 million programme this year to collaborate with electric car manufacturers, including Renault-Nissan and Mitsubishi, to test their vehicles in an urban environment. It is also working with Keppel Energy to develop charging stations and other infrastructure to support electric cars on city commutes and other local travel. Similar test-bedding is under way in Israel and Denmark.

Attending the Tokyo Motor Show in October last year, Mr Carlos Ghosn, the head of Renault-Nissan, said the electric car is 'no longer a daydream - the technology allows it now'. He predicted that pure-electric vehicles could account for 10 per cent of all new car purchases by 2020 - by far the most ambitious forecast in the industry.

By contrast, US research firm CSM Worldwide estimates that automakers around the world will build only 100,000 electric cars in 2015, accounting for about 0.1 per cent of total production.

The main barriers to widespread adoption of electric cars are high cost, limited range and lack of infrastructure. Most electric cars can be driven for no more than about 160km before their batteries have to be recharged or swopped for a full battery. In the tropics, this range may be cut by up to 20 per cent when driving with air-conditioning.

However, research shows that most car owners in the US, Europe and Japan drive less than 100km a day, making electric vehicles a practical proposition, except on long journeys.

The cost premium of green driving is a bigger obstacle. Mitsubishi's i-MiEV model that will be tested in Singapore retails for about $160,000, around $100,000 more than the petrol version. The early electric models will remain expensive because of their relatively small sales volumes and high battery costs.

New lithium-ion batteries, the technology expected to underpin the next wave of hybrid and electric vehicles, provide the same power at half the weight of the current standard nickel-metal hydride batteries. However, lithium batteries cost three to four times as much as nickel ones, and the price of the older technology is continuing to drop fast.

Britain, France and the US are offering substantial tax rebates to encourage more people to buy plug-in hybrid and electric cars. Renault-Nissan is considering leasing lithium batteries to reduce the upfront cost to buyers of its electric cars.

In China, Japan, Singapore, Israel, Denmark and the US, governments and the private sector are teaming up to work out the best ways of establishing networks of rapid recharging or battery-swopping stations.

Electric power is promising a revolution in road transport. But there will be consumer resistance as long as inconvenience and added costs remain significant factors.

The writer is a visiting senior research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Read more!

Singapore LNG misses deadline for selecting contractor

It was scheduled to award the main EPC contract by end-'09
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 4 Jan 10;

(SINGAPORE) Singapore LNG Corporation (SLNG) has missed an end-2009 deadline to appoint an engineering, procurement and construction or EPC contractor to build the earlier-delayed $1-1.5 billion LNG terminal on Jurong Island - although from various accounts, there is just a slight slippage in the schedule, with sources saying that SLNG is 'in the final negotiation stage' regarding the contract.

SLNG, set up last July by the Energy Market Authority to take over the terminal's development, was scheduled to award the main EPC contract by end-2009, so that construction proper can start this month, with the LNG terminal becoming operational in 2013.

As is, work on the terminal - earlier scheduled to begin operations in 2012 - is one year late as the earlier developer, PowerGas and GDF Suez, 'found it challenging to develop the project on a commercial basis and on time' due to the economic downturn and 'more difficult and costly financing' during the credit crunch.

'We are going through the (award) process and things are on track,' a source assured, when asked if there were any serious issues hampering the award of the EPC contract.

Three shortlisted EPC groups are vying for the project. They comprise CB&I (Chicago Bridge & Iron); a consortium led by British company Whessoe and including SK Engineering and LG International from South Korea; and South Korea's Samsung.

Senior officials overseeing the LNG terminal development, including EMA CEO Lawrence Wong, have been on leave and were not available for comment.



Mr Wong earlier said that the EPC award for the terminal will be made by year-end - a deadline which is also indicated on EMA's website.

The terminal, to be built on a 30-hectare site, will comprise two 150,000 cubic metre tanks with storage capacity of three million tonnes per annum, with plans to double this at a later stage.

The LNG is meant to help Singapore diversify its supplies of natural gas - used by power stations and industries here - currently coming via pipeline from just Indonesia and Malaysia.

Singapore's largest generating company Senoko Power, for instance, just started construction of its earlier deferred $750 million re-powering project last month - to tie in with development of the LNG terminal - so that it can use the LNG once its own repowering project is ready in the third quarter of 2012.


Read more!

Why GM crops can't feed the world

Straits Times Forum 4 Jan 10;

IT WAS with great concern that I read the report, 'Super rice under development' (Dec 25). Genetically engineered or modified (GM) crops are often touted as 'a solution to world hunger', promising yield increases via resistance to pesticides and high tolerance to flooding, drought and salinity.

A closer look at the GM industry reveals a different story. The tests done by the companies are far from conclusive as to whether GM crops are safe either for the environment or human health. Nutritionists are discovering that food sensitivities are increasingly coming from traditionally benign foods that could have their source in GM ingredients.

What is worse is that consumers lose total control over what they put on their plates, as many GM products are pushed unlabelled for fear that consumers will not accept them.

There is no conclusive evidence that yields increase because of GM agriculture. Studies have shown that the same or better results can be achieved with integrated pest management and sustainable agricultural practices by promoting a biodiversity of crops.

In fact, GM is a threat to food security as large monocultures dependent on few traits in selected crop species can lead to catastrophic shocks in the system, as in the case of famines in Ireland in the 19th century or in Ethiopia in the 20th century.

Many farmers in Ghana and India have reduced crop failures by cultivating drought-resistant varieties of the same species, which also leads to better water management and reduced pesticide use.

GM seeds are patented and sold at a hefty premium to farmers who also have to pay a hefty technology fee. Intellectual property rights mean farmers get a licence to use the seeds for only one year, and cannot save seeds as they have done for centuries.

Hunger is not a technological problem. It is a distribution problem, as food is concentrated in the hands of some. GM is a strategy which will only perpetuate poverty and hunger, as it destroys small farmers' livelihood and self-sufficiency.

Bhavani Prakash (Ms)

Full letter on Super Rice or Monster Rice? Why GM crops can’t feed the world
from EcoWalkthetalk


Read more!

Sabah tour operator acts to save marine habitat

Jaswinder Kaur, New Straits Times 3 Jan 10;

KOTA KINABALU: Tired of seeing rubbish floating on crystal-clear waters at Pulau Mabul, off Sabah's east coast, a small tour operator has taken things into its own hands.
In an effort to save the sea and marine habitat, Scuba Jeff Sipadan Paradise, which is 20 minutes away from the world-renowned Pulau Sipadan, is now paying villagers to collect rubbish.

The community service started on Dec 19 with the operator paying 50 sen for each bag filled with plastic bottles and waste that largely ended up in the sea from villages on the island.

"For a start, we got children involved in the project. They are good swimmers and were very happy to help. They collected 125 plastic bags.

"We want to do this two to three times a month to save the sea. It is a start," the owner, who only wanted to be known as Zaidi, said on the island.

He said it costs RM300 to rent a boat to have the waste sent to Semporna, about 45 minutes away.

Zaidi said there was no point in waiting for someone else to do the job, and that he was happy to help in his own small way.

Mabul now has close to 10 resorts and guest houses, following the government decision to stop overnight stays at Sipadan five years ago.

Mabul is also known for diving, an important revenue earner for Sabah.


Read more!

Bataan town, a model in protecting migratory birds

Butch Gunio, Business Mirror 3 Jan 10;

BALANGA CITY—The Wild Bird Club of the Philippines (WBCP) has urged local government units (LGUs) around Manila Bay to adopt this city as a model in protecting migratory birds and promoting bird watching as ecotourism.

Michael Lu, president of WBCP, said that in just a few years, the city government here was able to initiate programs and projects to protect migratory birds and launched the city as a top bird-watching destination in the country.

Last year, this city was officially launched by Tourism Sec. Joseph Ace Durano as one of the 12 premier bird-watching sites in the Philippines. To promote the city internationally, the Department of Tourism (DOT) also launched a guide book for the country’s bird-watching destinations.

A group of experts and the DOT gave the thumbs up to Balanga City after visiting the seaside villages of Tortugas, Puerto Rivas Ibaba and Sibacan. The team was composed of officials from the DOT, tour operators and WBCP.

The Sibacan-Lote bird site has abundant vegetation that attracts migratory and local birds. Trees, shrubs and bushes are home to Fantails, Eurasian Tree Sparrow, Munia, Sunbirds, Trillers, Shrikes, Blue Tailed Bee Eater and Flycatchers, said the WBCP.

Ponds are attractive feeding grounds for Asian Golden Plover, Redshank, Marsh Sandpiper, Greenshanks, Pacific Golden Plover, Kentish Mongolian Plover, Greater Sand Plover, Little Ringed Plover, Whimbrel, Red-Necked Stint, Common Sandpiper, Black Winged Stilt and several species of egrets.

The Puerto Rivas-Ibaba bird site has preserved a thick mangrove forest, grassland and wetland that serve as favorable roosting grounds to crows, waterhens, kites, falcons, hawks, pigeons, herons and egrets.  Sighted in the area are Little Egrets, Purple Herons, Brahminy Kites, Peregrine Falcon, Chestnut Checked Starling, White Breasted Waterhens, Rails, Wood Sandpiper, Rufous Necked Stint, Grey Heron and species of Kingfishers, Flower Peckers and Sandpipers.

Mangroves and mudflats found at the Tortugas bird site are excellent roosting and feeding grounds for waders and waterbirds, said WBCP.

Commonly seen in the area are Wood Sandpipers, Terek Sandpipers, Great Egrets, Cattle Egrets, Little Egrets, Sunbirds, Whimbrel, Marsh Sandpipers, Common Tern, White Winged Tern, Whiskered Tern, Black Crowned Night Heron, Chinese Egrets, Intermediate Egrets, Rails, Shrikes, White Collared Kingfisher, Asian Dowitcher Common Kingfisher, Blue Tailed Bee Eaters, Curlew Sandpipers, Black Headed Gulls and other shore birds.

The DOT is packaging a 22-day bird-watching activity for tourists in 12 sites in the Philippines for $10,000 per person, inclusive of airfare and board and lodging. The sites are divided into clusters with this city in the group composed of Subic and Candaba Swamp in Pampanga.

Other bird-watching sites promoted by the DOT are the Paranaque Critical Habitat in Las PiƱas; Mount Palay-Palay National Park in Ternate, Cavite; Villa Escudero in Laguna; Nug-As Forest in Alcoy and Olango Island Wildlife Sanctuary, both in Cebu; Philippine Eagle Center in Davao; Hundred Islands National Park in Alaminos and Mangrove Marine Protected Area I in Bani, both in Pangasinan; and Rasa Island and Puerto Princesa Subterranean River National Park in Palawan.


Read more!

Coastal forest cannot block tsunami

ARC Center of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
Science Alert 4 Jan 10;

On the 5th anniversary of the Indian Ocean Tsunami, an international scientific team has cautioned against claims that ‘bioshields’ - belts of coastal trees - offer protection from tsunami or storm surges.

In fact, planting alien trees along exposed coastlines will do more harm than good, by destroying local ecosystems, displacing people and taking money away from more effective coastal defence projects, according to the scientists.

In the wake of the Indian Ocean Tsunami that struck on December 26 2004, it was widely claimed by many conservation organizations and some scientists that coastal vegetation could reduce the damage caused by tsunamis.

These claims led to large scale efforts to plant belts of foreign trees along exposed coasts in the hope of protecting people from future tsunamis or from storm surges produced during tropical storms, such as Hurricane Katrina or Cyclone Nargis.

However, after reviewing over 30 papers on the subject, the researchers from Australia, Bangladesh, Belgium, France, Guam, India, Sri Lanka and the USA conclude that most of the original claims were false.

“There is very little evidence for the idea that coastal vegetation provides meaningful protection from these major surge events. Also, planting introduced, foreign tree species as ‘bioshields’ is doing extraordinary environmental damage” says the lead author of the paper, Dr Rusty Feagin of Texas A & M University.

“Even more extraordinarily, local topography, such as sand dunes, which CAN provide protection against surges, are being bulldozed to make way for ‘bioshields’ of exotic species.” says Dr Kartik Shanker of the Indian Institute of Science.

Spending money on planting ‘bioshields’ is also diverting funds from projects with proven potential to save lives, and creating a false sense of security, say the scientists.

“The best way to protect human lives against tsunamis or large storm surges is through education, early warning and evacuation planning” says Dr Andrew Baird of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University.

“The technology is available for adequate early warning. If this is backed up by sensible evacuation planning, there is no reason for anyone to die in a tsunami or a storm surge nowadays,” he says.

A case study from Andhra Pradesh India reveals that tsunami relief funding is being used to continue development programs, which include planting exotic species such as Casuarina for firewood, rather than provide any meaningful tsunami protection. "The UNDP has provided millions of dollars for 'bioshield' construction, however, while the trees are being planted, they are being placed beside or even behind coastal villages, where they can't possibly provide protection against ocean surges" says Sudarshan Rodriguez of Dakshin Foundation, India.

The research also challenges the common misconception that storm surges are just large wind waves, pointing out that they are very similar to tsunami in their behaviour and the type of damage they cause.

“While coastal vegetation is very effective at slowing down wind waves, tsunami and storm surges are entirely different beasts” says Dr Alex Kerr from the Marine Laboratory of the University of Guam.

“All vegetation is permeable to the flooding produced by long period waves like tsunami, because they are many kilometer thick, and while forest may slow down the flooding, it can never prevent it,” he adds.

While introduced species offer little protection to coastal communities from surge events, there is still benefit in conserving local vegetation, such as dense mangroves, for the simple fact that by being there mangroves prevents people from working and living in harm’s way, say the researchers.

“Restoring areas of destroyed mangroves also makes sense because of the many other ecological goods and services they provide, as long as environmental conditions are right” says Nibedita Mukherjee and Dr Farid Dahdouh-Guebas of Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

“We need to understand that there is a difference between restoring native vegetation such as mangroves that are naturally adapted to the dynamic conditions on local coastlines around the world, and introducing alien trees purely for the purpose of trying to stabilize a coastline,” adds Dr Feagin.

'Shelter from the storm? Use and misuse of coastal vegetation bioshields for managing natural disasters' will be published early 2010 in Conservation Letters.


Read more!

Queensland wetlands restored in world first

Kym Agius, Brisbane Times 3 Jan 10;

Life is creeping back into a wetland in north Queensland for the first time in decades after scientists cured the ecosystem from deadly sulfuric acid runoff in a world first.

The tidal wetlands at East Trinity, in Cairns, have been seeping acid since they were cleared in the 1970s for sugar cane farms.

The Queensland government bought the land in 2001 and began restoring the soil with the help of CRC CARE and Southern Cross University.

The scientists have used existing flood gates to allow sea water into the wetlands again, little by little, and where areas were still too acidic, hydrated lime was added.

The once-sterile creeks, still stained in parts with the iron-red deposits from the acidification process, now swarm with tiny fish, creating an abundant nursery to rebuild fish numbers along the coast and nearby Great Barrier Reef.

CRC CARE spokesman Peter Martin said mangroves had also started to reinvade.

"Almost from nowhere, it is quite amazing," Mr Martin told AAP.

"The return of the crabs and fish and all the other species that were there has been amazing to see."

More than 100 wild bird species have also been recorded.

It's the largest area of wetlands ever restored from acid runoff, and it has sparked international interest.

Professor Richard Bush from CRC CARE and Southern Cross University said the process was easier and cheaper than current practices.

"If you tried to treat all the acid sulfate soil at East Trinity according to current recommended practice, it would cost over $300 million and require complete vegetation clearing," he said.

"Our process is returning nature for a mere fraction of that."

Scientists from all over the world have come to check out the project and those involved want to see it turned into a tourist attraction.

CRC CARE managing director Professor Ravi Naidu said acidic soil and wetlands were a problem of global proportions, and Australian scientists had demonstrated for the first time it could be reversed.

"The approach devised at East Trinity could form the basis for a new export industry in remediation."

AAP

Acid-hurt wetlands restored
CRC CARE, Science Alert 4 Jan 10;

Australian scientists have announced the world’s first successful large-scale restoration of a coastal wetland being devastated by acid runoff.

A dramatic improvement in environmental conditions has been achieved by researchers working on the trial Hills Creek catchment at the East Trinity site near Cairns in Queensland, using a combination of natural tidal action and strategic treatment with lime.

Mangrove and wetlands are returning, birdlife is flocking to the area and fish abound in creeks that once ran so acid that nothing could survive in them. Having first demonstrated success in the trial catchment, remediation is underway on the remainder of the site.

The acid crisis at East Trinity began in the 1970s, when developers drained and cleared 800 hectares of tidal wetland to grow sugarcane. This dried out underlying acid sulfate soils causing them to release slugs of acid whenever they were soaked by rain, leading to fish kills and loss of wetlands which alarmed local residents.

Today East Trinity is a world class demonstration of large-scale restoration in action, says CRC CARE managing director Professor Ravi Naidu. ‘There are an estimated 40 million hectares of similar acid coastal wetlands round the world and at least 4 million in Australia, including the lower Murray-Darling, and areas along the coasts of NSW, Queensland, SA coasts and WA’, he says.

‘This is a problem of global proportions, and Australian scientists have convincingly demonstrated for the first time on a large scale that it can be reversed and natural values restored.’

The main restoration work, being carried out by the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management in partnership with CRC CARE and Southern Cross University, has made East Trinity a CRC CARE National Demonstration Site, providing a practical example of remediation in action. World leading, new scientific research has been published by the team to assist with understanding the complex problem of remediating acid sulfate soils.

According to CRC CARE project leader Dr Richard Bush of Southern Cross University, restoration began in 2001 after the Qld Government purchased the land to remediate the acidic soils and protect the natural green backdrop to Cairns. The site was declared a ‘reserve for environmental purposes’.

‘We decided to take advantage of the enclosing sea wall built by the original developers to exclude the tide and drain the site. We re-introduced a partial tidal exchange through adjustable floodgates, so as to gradually re-flood the most acidic sediments and prevent them producing more acid.’

‘Where the runoff was still too acid we added hydrated lime using specially designed equipment.’

Gradually the mangroves began to recolonise, with a wider species diversity than the scientists had dared hope for.

‘The birds are back too. In fact the bird life is fantastic with more than 100 wild species observable within a 10 minute boat ride of the Cairns CBD. How many cities in the world can claim that?’

The once-sterile creeks, still stained in parts with the iron-red deposits from the acidification process, now swarm with tiny fish, creating an abundant nursery to rebuild fish numbers along the coast and nearby Great Barrier Reef.

‘Essentially we are reversing the chemistry of what took place when the acidic soils were drained. If you tried to treat all the acid sulfate soil at East Trinity according to current recommended practice, it would cost over $300 million and require complete vegetation clearing. Our process is returning nature for a mere fraction of that.’

To keep the acid at bay, however, means that for a third of the site soils will have to remain permanently a tidal wetland, making it unsuited to major developments such as marinas or high-rise urban living. However Cairns could inherit a huge nature park with potential for an eco-tourist attraction right on its doorstep.

Besides developing a solution suitable for tidal wetlands almost anywhere, Professor Naidu says the approach devised at East Trinity could form the basis for a new export industry in remediation.

As communities the world over see fish kills, dying estuaries and vanishing birdlife, the realisation is dawning that we have made some serious mistakes in how we developed these sensitive landscapes – and people, indeed cities, are now looking for answers, Professor Naidu said.

‘The fact that Australia has devised and demonstrated a large-scale solution to coastal acid-sulfate soils creates a remarkable opportunity for a new form of knowledge exports, capable of returning acidified and degraded coastal areas to healthy natural environments again’, he said.

“East Trinity is a global case study, and a beacon of hope that this can be achieved.”


Read more!

Rumble in the Jungle: Man And Elephants Fight It Out in Jambi’s Forests

Dewi Kurniawati, Jakarta Globe 3 Jan 10;

Sekutur Jaya, Jambi. Despite its serenity, complete with smiling, laid-back people, a serious problem is weighing heavily upon this remote village in central Sumatra.

Just mention “Elephas maximus sumatranus,” or the Sumatran elephant, and the serenity and smiles are replaced by fear, angry comments and a sense of helplessness.

Since 2002, herds of wild elephants have continually rampaged through palm oil plantations belonging to residents of Sekutur Jaya, destroying their crops and leaving angry farmers at their wits’ end, as well as worried about their food security. The fact that the elephants are an endangered species, and are merely reacting to human encroachment into their habitat, does little to mollify the villagers.

Sekutur Jaya was only founded in 1997 by transmigrants from Java and Sumatra.

“Could you please give me the forestry minister’s phone number? I’d like to tell him about our despair,” Sukur Rahmat, 58, the weary-looking village head, told visiting journalists from the Jakarta Globe.

As the lowest-ranking government representative in the area, Sukur is not only the depository for frequent complaints from the 275 families in the village, but is also one of the them, as the herds also affect his farm. “This week, those beasts came every day, destroying our palm oil fields,” Sukur said, taking a deep breath.

Their sense of helplessness is understandable: What can a group of villagers do against an angry pack of pachyderms, most weighing several thousand pounds or more?

That’s not to say they haven’t tried. Every Thursday night, villagers walk to the fields to recite from the Koran, praying that the wild elephants will go away. They’ve also reported the problem to less divine authorities, including the district chief and Jambi’s governor, but no solution has been forthcoming.

“It’s very frustrating to see palm oil trees that you take care of every day destroyed by wild elephants,” said Lukman, a transmigrant from East Java. “It seems that we don’t have a future anymore.”

“Where else can we go now?” Fauzi, another resident, said emotionally. “I started my field with 245 palm oil trees, now there are only 39 left.”

Fauzi said he no longer had the energy to continue farming and attempting to fight back, and he’s not alone. Comments from numerous other villagers ranged from “I’m ready to leave this place” to “How come nobody will help us?”

The root of the problem, unfortunately, is beyond the comprehension of these palm oil farmers. Long before the first houses were erected in Sekutur Jaya, Sumatran elephants roamed through the area. The village is merely apart of the offending herds’ home range.

The central government’s controversial transmigration policy, which began in the 1970s, eventually found its way to the forests of central Sumatra, which were cleared for settlements. It’s unlikely that government officials ever foresaw turf battles between humans and elephants.

Encroachment is an issue in other areas of Sumatra, and it’s not only about elephants. There were numerous incidents in 2009 of Sumatran tigers, another endangered species, attacking, and in some cases killing, illegal loggers, poachers and even villagers that were intruding into their territory. In response, humans are hunting, trapping and killing tigers.

A herd of Sumatran elephants needs a home range of at least 400 hectares, but rampant deforestation in Jambi has seen their territory replaced by palm oil plantations, leading to frequent clashes.

“Residents should understand that their village is the elephants’ home range. That is why they will destroy everything on their way [through],” said Osman Tri, coordinator for animal protection at World Wildlife Fund Indonesia in Riau Islands province, which borders Jambi.

“Humans have to learn to share space with elephants if they want a peaceful life,” he said.

The elephants that have been trampling through Sekutur Jaya village are among a remaining population of only 600 in Sumatra. Villagers won’t hesitate to shoot elephants to drive them away — there are regular tales of harrowing encounters and photos of elephant carcasses — meaning the “man versus wild” battle will continue until the regional or national government finds a solution.

“The central government has the power to bring about an equilibrium between humans and elephants,” Osman said. “We should ask the government what it will do to overcome this problem.”

Jambi’s provincial and district governments, despite wielding more power through decentralization, haven’t done anything because they don’t see this issue as a high priority, he said.

“[Central] government regulations issued in 2008 state that local governments should set up some kind of task force for animal conservation, but no local governments have abided by that regulation through today,” Osman said.

Didy Wurjanto, head of the Natural Resources Conservation Center in Jambi, told the Globe that in his view, the final solution is to relocate Sekutur Jaya village and give the land back to the elephants.

“It’s their home range, so we can’t win this conflict unless we compensate those elephants and give them a new home, which would cost a lot,” he said.

The other alternative, Didy said, would be to move the herd to one of the province’s national parks.

“But I think it would be best if we just relocate the village. We can [then] make a new elephant national park,” Didy said, citing the Way Kambas Elephant Training Center in Lampung as an example of establishing a preserve. “We can even add additional value to this solution, such as setting up the center as a new tourism site,” he added.

However, it may not be easy to convince Sekutur Jaya’s transmigrant villagers, who have spent the last decade there and are attached to their fields and way of life.

To the villagers, wildlife conservation is an alien concept.

Some farmers even sleep in their fields every night, lighting fires in some areas in an attempt to keep the elephants away.

“This palm oil field is the only thing we have. I can send my children to school from the results of this field,” said Kusnari, a transmigrant from West Sumatra. “I don’t understand why we should leave our village.

“I mean, these fields were created by the government. Why can’t the government move those elephants somewhere else?” Kusnari said. “We just can’t leave this place.”

But neither can the elephants. Eventually, something will have to give, or Sekutur Jaya will never know peace.


Read more!

Botswana: weed intrusion threatens fish and tourism on Okavango

Refentse Tessa Yahoo News 4 Jan 10;

GABORONE (AFP) – The Okavango Delta, a natural treasure in northern Botswana, is under threat after a large portion of the reservoir was infested with weed threatening tourism and fishing industries.

Salvinia molesta weed also known as Kariba weed, which originates from South America, is believed to have found its way to the delta through the water that flows in from Angola's infested rivers.

The free floating dark green weed makes it very difficult for cruising, especially on canoes, and also suffocates the different fish species which is a headache for communities who depend on the delta for their livelihood.

"It is thus important for members of the community and tour operators to combine forces and fight this weed which is threatening the livelihood of most people in the Okavango region.

"Its effects may not be felt at the moment but if it spreads further then the fishermen will definitely feel the pinch," said Ketlhatlogile Masepelinge, a fisheries biologist at the University of Botswana.

The problem which was increasing prompted the community and tourism stakeholders to work together to get rid of weed as both parties had a lot to lose should the weed spread.

"Fishing is a source of income for most of us in this part of Botswana, and if it means working day and night to destroy this weed which is threatening our fish, then let it be so," said Faosiko Wake, the chairman of the Okavango Fishermen?s Association.

Tourism will also suffer should the problem persist.

"Tourists love cruising in the delta and we have to make sure that nothing stands in their way," said Morongoe Ntloedibe, chief executive officer of Hospitality and Tourism Association of Botswana.

The weed is being destroyed using weevil insects which feed on it and destroy it in the process. Tour operators and members of the community have to breed this insect which has a lifespan of about 60 days then release it into the delta.

"This is the best way of getting rid of this weed as the method is friendly to the environment. We could have used chemicals but these are harmful to other organisms in the water," the director of environmental affairs in the Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Environment, Steve Monna, told AFP.

He said the weed has been present in the delta for some time but in small quantities. However the spread was caused by floodwaters and winds in recent months which prompted government to launch the programme to destroy it.

"It is now up to the communities and tour operators to make sure that they work hard in breeding the weevils," he said.

Monna said so far the programme was progressing well as both parties had shown commitment to working towards destroying the weed.


Read more!

Lava flows ravage national park forest in DRCongo

Yahoo News 3 Jan 10;

GOMA, DR Congo (AFP) – Lava flowing from a volcanic eruption in eastern DR Congo was gathering pace and set to destroy up to 10 hectares (25 acres) of forest in Virunga National Park by late Sunday, vulcanologists said.

The Goma Vulcanological Observatory, which has been monitoring the eruption of nearby Mount Nyamulagira early Saturday, said the pace of destruction would increase as it hit steeper ground.

"From Monday, the speed will increase because the territory starts to slope whereas it had been flatlands before," the observatory's director Karume Katcho told AFP.

He said a 15 metre-wide swathe of lava "is burning the forest. We estimate that up to 10 hectares (25 acres) of the area will be burnt after today."

Officials said the eruption was concentrated in a sparsely populated area, though wildlife habitats were under threat.

The volcano stands 22 kilometres (14 miles) from the provincial capital Goma, which it last threatened in 2006.

Virunga National Park is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and located on a chain of active volcanoes including Nyamulagira. It is home to around 200 of the world's last 750 mountain gorillas, but these are located further east of the volcano near the border with Rwanda.

The national park also contains large numbers other species, including elephants, hippopotamus and buffalo..

The ash and volcanic fibres from the eruption are harmful to animals as they can pierce their stomachs and intestines, but so far the chimpanzee population in the risk zone has not been affected, wildlife officials said..


Read more!

Penang to penalise outlets that ignore 'No Plastic Day’ campaign

Manjit Kaur, The Star 2 Jan 10;

GEORGE TOWN: Penang will become the first in South-East Asia to take action against outlets that do not observe the “No Plastic Day” campaign this year.

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the action included the imposing of a fine or the rejection of licence renewal applications by the local authorities.

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said that for the first three months, the state would create, awareness and education on the matter, and at the end of March make a decision whether to extend the campaign or to start enforcement strictly.

He, however, said the enforcement such as fines, issuance and renewal of business licenses and penalties would start this year with a date to be announced later.

Lim said that even though the state hoped to become a green state quickly, they would not impose unbearable burdens on businesses and would proceed progressively.

He hoped that businesses could familiarise themselves and support this important green initiative for the benefit of the future generation.

Lim said Penang had decided to take the bold step to promote a state-wide campaign to reduce plastic bags consumption last year.

“I know that this decision will not please everyone especially the plastic bag manufacturers, but we are ready to expect criticism.

“The state government also expects to lose popularity, however, for the sake of our children and unborn grandchildren we are willing to face such risks.

“We are willing to lose our popularity but not our next generation,” he told a press conference after launching the extension days of the “No Plastic Day’ on Tuesdays and Wednesdays in the state from Jan 1 at Komtar Walk here Saturday.

It was reported on Nov 28 last year that the state government had decided to extend its ‘No Plastic Monday’ campaign against the use of plastic bags to three days in a week.

Lim said all stores (not including hawkers) must observe at least one day a week without plastic bags, while hypermarkets and supermarkets must abide by the ruling three days a week.

He said those who wanted plastic bags would be charged 20sen per plastic bag, which would then be channelled to the state government’s ‘Partners Against Poverty’ (PAP) fund to wipe out hardcore poverty.

“To date we have collected RM27,000 for the PAP fund from the proceeds,” he added.

Lim said it was the responsibility of everyone to ensure that the environment was protected.

He said the consumption of plastic bags was so enormous a heap of plastic bags as big as Borneo were floating in the Pacific Ocean.

“Therefore, Penang has start the ball rolling to make changes to our lifestyle,” he added.


Read more!

Selangor shoppers caught unawares by ‘No Plastic Bag Day’ campaign

Shaun Ho, The Star 4 Jan 10;

PETALING JAYA: Selangor’s first ‘No Plastic Bag Day’ on Jan 2 went by so quietly that many consumers, although applauding the move, were frustrated at being caught unawares.

The Selangor government had on Dec 20 declared its plans to make every Saturday a plastic bag-free day effective Jan 1.

A senior executive who wished to be known as Raj said he had gone shopping at a hypermarket in Subang Jaya on Saturday, not knowing it was the first day of the campaign.

“At the counter, the cashier told me it was a ‘no plastic day’ and she would not give me plastic bags.

“There was no visible sign to announce about the campaign. As I had bought more than RM100 worth of groceries, she gave me a complimentary reusable shopping bag,” said Raj, who works in the shipping industry as a purchasing officer.

He added that the bag was not big enough to contain all the purchased items, and he had to cart the trolley to the car park and unload the items into his car boot.

“I support the campaign, but it should be made known to consumers. I saw many others caught by surprise at the cashier’s line.”

Carrefour public relations manager Salmieah Mohd Zin said there had been a few complaints from consumers at its stores but “it was a matter of educating the public.”

She added that most Carrefour stores in the Klang Valley have been plastic bag-free since last year and their target was to have no plastic bags in Carrefour Malaysia by 2012.

Customers who insist on plastic bags will have to pay 10 sen per bag.

However, Giant will only be implementing its “no plastic bag” days from Jan 9, said marketing manager Ho Mun Hao.

He said their stores in Penang had promoted the campaign well, with managers explaining the concept to customers.

“We will prepare carton boxes for customers to pack their things. Plastic bags will still be available at 20 sen but we will be selling reusable bags at RM1.99,” Ho added.

Cold Storage will also observe the ‘no plastic bag day’ on Saturdays. Currently, the stores do not give out plastic bags on Thursdays.

Convenience store chain 7-11 will also be starting its ‘no plastic bag’ campaign this Saturday, its website said.


Read more!

Shell CO2 stocking plans under fire

Martine Pauwels Yahoo News 2 Jan 10;

BARENDRECHT, Netherlands (AFP) – A plan by oil giant Shell to store 300,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year in a depleted gas reservoir beneath the Dutch city of Barendrecht has drawn the ire of residents and local officials who have vowed to thwart it.

"We are going to do everything to oppose this project," declared Barendrecht deputy mayor Simon Zuurbier, who voiced fears for the safety of the city's 50,000 inhabitants.

"We are taking legal action to get it cancelled and we'll approve none of the required permits."

Anglo-Dutch Shell in November was authorised by the Dutch government to undertake a project to capture and store a portion of the 5.0 megatonnes of carbon dioxide emitted each year by the company's refinery in Pernis, Europe's largest. Pernis is located 15 kilometers (9.4 miles) from here.

Under the scheme, set to get under way in 2012, the CO2 will be carried by a pipeline and, after being compressed, will be injected into a depleted gas reservoir 1,800 meters (5,900 feet) under ground. The reservoir has a capacity of 800,000 tonnes.

Shell has said that over time the CO2 will dissolve or form minerals.

With a positive evaluation of the initiative by government-mandated experts, the project will be extended in a few years to another nearby gas reservoir, with a 9.0 megatonne capacity and part of which lies under Barendrecht city center.

"It's ridiculous to carry out such an experiment in a densely populated area," insisted Zuurbier.

Klaas Brantjes, a member of a residents' association, said that while "we have been given the illusion of security, all the risks are not known."

"The risks that CO2 will escape are real and are especially dangerous as the city is situated in a basin."

But a spokesman for the Dutch foreign ministry, Jan van Diepen, insisted that "the project is safe, otherwise the government would not have given the go-ahead."

The Dutch government is providing 30 million euros to help finance the facility. Shell has declined to reveal the overall cost.

Shell says the carbon capture and storage by injection technique has already been tested in Norway and the United States.

"CCS (carbon capture and storage) is a safe technique in itself," Margriet Kuijper, Shell Manager of Carbon Capture and Storage Projects and Studies, said on the company website.

"It will be carried out with so many safeguards that it can be used anywhere, even in residential areas."

The Netherlands, which emitted 174.5 megatonnes of CO2 in 2008, has a total storage capacity of 1,600 megatonnes.

"It is imperative to capture and store CO2 in order to reach our target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions" by 20 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, van Diepen said.

"If a fifth of the country's energy production is from renewable sources by 2020, which is what the government wants, it would mean that 80 percent would still come from fossil fuels," he said.

"Storing CO2 is therefore inescapable as a transition technology to limit climate damage."

It's an argument dismissed by the environmental group Greenpeace, which has said "the enormous subsidies" allocated to burying carbon gas contribute to "maintaining polluting industries" at the expense of cleaner energy.

Shell has acknowledged that carbon storage operations have an impact on the environment, as they release a quantity of CO2 equal to 5.0 percent of the carbon gas being stored.


Read more!

Thai pollution dispute targets Australian giant

Ben Doherty, The Age 4 Jan 10;

AUSTRALIAN steel giant BlueScope is caught in a court dispute in Thailand that has stalled billions of dollars in projects, after allegations that unchecked industrial pollution in the Thai port town of Map Ta Phut is killing residents and poisoning the environment.

Critics have said the Supreme Court decision to forbid 65 industrial developments, worth nearly $A9 billion, in Map Ta Phut will threaten the precarious recovery of the Thai economy. The central bank says the delays will cost 0.5 per cent of GDP growth. But local campaigners claim people's health, and the environment, have for years been ignored in favour of profits.

Map Ta Phut is a sprawling petrochemicals hub, the eighth-largest in the world. More than 100 factories, spread over 16 square kilometres, employ more than 30,000 people.

Thailand's Public Health Ministry found the incidence of cancer and leukaemia in Map Ta Phut were five times the national average.

Greenpeace air testing found the level of airborne toxic chemicals - including carcinogens benzene and vinyl chloride - were between 60 and 3000 times the accepted Western levels.

Villagers in the area do not walk in the rain because they say it burns their skin and causes their hair to fall out.

The lobby group that brought the court challenge, the East People's Network, says the air and water pollutants are causing birth defects and more than 2000 people have died from cancer in the past decade. However, doctors have been unable to conclusively link the deaths to hazardous chemicals used in the area.

Thailand's largest publicly listed company, the gas giant PTT, and Siam Cement, another big Thai company, have had 18 projects stalled by the court decision.

But also caught up are international companies: Germany's Bayer, Indian chemical maker Aditya Birla, and Australia's largest steel producer, BlueScope Steel. The suspension of the projects could cost operators $A8.7 billion in lost revenue a year, according to the Federation of Thai Industries.

BlueScope's current operations are unaffected by the ruling, and the company says it has not been impacted by the court's decision because it has no immediate expansion plans for the vacant land it owns in Map Ta Phut.

But the company is named in Supreme Court documents obtained by The Age that forbid any ''enlargement of cold-rolled and galvanised steel manufacturing by BlueScope Steel''.

Local resident Noi Jaitant is not worried about money, how much is lost, or what, if anything, he might ever be compensated.

Now 70, he has spent the past decade burying relatives. Six in all: his mother, brother, mother-in-law, two sons-in-law and a niece. All from cancers: breast, lung and bone. Their portraits hang on a wall at his home.

Two months ago, his wife was diagnosed. ''I have sadness in my life, all the time. I am very sad,'' he says.

''I never think about the money, I never think about getting some money. I don't need it. I just want the companies to manage themselves properly. And I want them to give proper treatment to the people who are sick.''

Since 2007, the law has required companies to conduct health impact assessments, alongside those focused on the environment, on developments to ensure people's health is not compromised. Companies would be required to hold public hearings into the health and environmental impacts.

Businesses argue many had operations under way when the laws came into force in 2007, and say they would happily comply with the health regulations, but no clear rules have been established.

The Government has faced criticism from both sides for failing to set up the independent commission it promised to oversee the health assessments. It is likely to be February at the earliest before that commission is established and industry has clear guidelines on any development.

Individual environmental and health assessments are typically expected to take six to 12 months to complete.

A BlueScope spokesman said the company was in discussions with the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand about having BlueScope removed from the list of injuncted Map Ta Phut projects.

''BlueScope Steel Thailand purchased the land about three years ago and it is surplus land to our existing operations. At no stage have we applied for approval to undertake any development on the land and we currently have no development plans,'' he said.

''We are still on the (Supreme Court injunction) list, however are taking steps with the IEAT to have BlueScope removed as we believe our listing is erroneous.''

But spokesman for the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand Payungsak Chartsutipol said the IEAT had no power to approve or disallow projects.

As the legal wrangling continues, outside the courtroom, the dispute has been far from civilised.

Spokesman for the Eastern People Network, and also on the executive committee of the ruling New Political Party (PAD), Sutti Atchasai, has had his life threatened on numerous occasions, and has been offered millions of baht in bribes to abandon the court challenge.

He said campaigners only wanted companies to follow the law, and the government to enforce it.

''There are regulations, they are supposed to be followed by all industries. And the Government must enforce the law, and must enforce it seriously,'' he said.


Read more!

China Battles To Stop Diesel Polluting Yellow River

Ben Blanchard, PlanetArk 4 Jan 10;

The leak, from a pipeline owned by China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) in northwestern Shaanxi province, was discovered on Wednesday, the official Xinhua news agency said.

The company immediately closed the pipeline when the accident happened, the report added, but not before some of the diesel ended up in the Weihe River, a tributary of the Yellow River, a major water source for millions of people.

"The company has built 23 blocking belts on the rivers and the local government built three more dams to prevent leaked oil from flowing into the Yellow River," Xinhua said.

"A 700-people crew has been working on the clean-up. So far, much of the leaked oil and polluted silt has already been taken away," it added, citing the company as its source.

But diesel has been detected in the water 33 km from the leak, Xinhua said, and residents have been warned against using any of the river water.

"Preliminary investigation showed that the pipeline damage was caused by construction work of a third party," it further quoted the company as saying, without elaborating.

China periodically faces spills into rivers that result in water supplies being cut off, most seriously in 2005 when an explosion at an industrial plant sent toxic chemicals streaming into the Songhua river in northeastern city of Harbin, forcing the shutdown of water supplies to nearly 4 million people.

Run-off from heavy fertilizer use, industrial waste and untreated sewage also caused a foul-smelling algae bloom on a lake in the southern province of Jiangsu in 2007 that left tap water undrinkable in a city of more than 2 million.

(Editing by Louise Ireland)

North China oil spill threatens Yellow River
Yahoo News 3 Jan 10;

BEIJING (AFP) – A burst oil pipeline in north China has spewed thousands of gallons (litres) of diesel into a major tributary of the Yellow River, state media said Sunday.

The spill occurred on Wednesday last week on the Chishui river in Shaanxi province when a pipeline operated by the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) ruptured, a statement on the Weinan city government website said.

Emergency measures have been taken to stop the leak, with 23 containment belts set up downstream from the spill and up to 700 people scrambling to clean up the mess, the statement said.

Local government officials refused to reveal how much diesel had spilled into the river or comment on the spill when contacted by AFP.

The official Xinhua news agency reported that up to 150,000 litres (40,000 US gallons) had leaked into the river about 70 kilometres (42 miles) from the Yellow River, one of China's longest watercourses.

Oil has already been detected 33 kilometres downstream from the spill, the report said.

"We must take thorough measures to handle the spill and the pollution and strictly prevent it from entering the Yellow River, while ensuring the safety of drinking water," the Chongqing Evening News quoted Vice Premier Li Keqiang as saying.

Local environmental departments have warned residents not to use the river water as it may be polluted, the report said.

A preliminary investigation showed that the pipeline rupture was caused by a local construction project, CNPC, one of China's biggest state-owned oil and gas companies, said in a statement.

The pipeline is used to transport diesel from northwest China's Gansu province to the central parts of the nation, it said.

Around 30 years of unbridled economic growth have left most of China's lakes and rivers heavily polluted while the nation's urban dwellers also face some of the world's worst air pollution.

More than 200 million Chinese currently do not have access to safe drinking water, according to government data.

In November 2005, a major oil spill on the Songhua river in northeast China's Heilongjiang province resulted in a cut off of water supplies to up to four million people in the provincial capital of Harbin before flowing down river into Russia, causing a diplomatic crisis.


Read more!

Environmental Refugees Unable to Return Home

Joanna Kakissis, The New York Times 3 Jan 10;

DHAKA, BANGLADESH — Mahe Noor left her village in southern Bangladesh after Cyclone Sidr flattened her family’s home and small market in 2007. Jobless and homeless, she and her husband, Nizam Hawladar, moved to this crowded megalopolis, hoping that they might soon return home.

Two years later, they are still here. Ms. Noor, 25, and Mr. Hawladar, 35, work long hours at low-paying jobs — she at a garment factory and he at a roadside tea stall. They are unable to save money after paying for food and rent on their dark shanty in Korail, one of the largest slums in Dhaka. And in their village, more people are leaving because of river erosion and dwindling job opportunities.

“We’re trapped,” Ms. Noor said.

Natural calamities have plagued humanity for generations. But with the prospect of worsening climate conditions over the next few decades, experts on migration say tens of millions more people in the developing world could be on the move because of disasters.

Rather than seeking a new life elsewhere in a mass international “climate migration,” as some analysts had once predicted, many of these migrants are now expected to move to nearby megacities in their own countries.

“Environmental refugees have lost everything,” said Rabab Fatima, the South Asia representative of the International Organization for Migration. “They don’t have the money to make a big move. They move to the next village, the next town and eventually to a city.”

Such rapid and unplanned urbanization is expected to put even further strains on scarce water, energy and food resources, said Koko Warner, who works in environmental migration at the United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security in Bonn.

In Bangladesh, a largely flat, riverine nation where more than 140 million people live in one of the most densely populated countries in the world, past generations often moved to cities seasonally. They worked to send money home to their villages and usually returned there during planting season.

But in recent years, the moves are more likely to be permanent. More intense storms and floods, salinization damage to crops caused by the encroaching sea and especially worsening river erosion have left many people rootless, Ms. Fatima said.

Dhaka, the capital, is often the only real option in this region. It is the fastest-growing megacity in the world, according to the World Bank. At least 12 million people live in Dhaka, and there are more than 400,000 newcomers each year. The World Bank predicts that the population could grow dramatically by 2020.

Like the rest of Bangladesh, Dhaka is also extremely vulnerable to climate change: It is just a few meters above sea level and is regularly hit by cyclones and floods. The environmental group WWF recently rated it among the megacities most vulnerable to the effects of global warming, after Jakarta and Manila.

As many as half of the people in Dhaka live in shantytowns and slums, says Atiq Rahman, a climate change researcher and executive director of the Bangladesh Center for Advanced Studies. Of those, Mr. Rahman and Ms. Fatima estimate that three million people have been displaced by environmental degradation or disasters.

The most destitute people live in clusters of improvised tents made of plastic sheets and discarded bamboo and often erected on private land near markets, railroad tracks and the city’s rivers.

Most poor, working-class families end up in minicities like Korail, where Ms. Noor, the migrant from southern Bangladesh, lives with her husband and two daughters. Ms. Noor’s third child, a son, lives with his grandmother in the family’s village.

Korail sits on public land and is shared by at least 40,000 people crowded into cramped, cockroach-infested rental shanties made of mud, bamboo and corrugated tin.

Barefoot children play with broken marbles on narrow mud lanes filled with garbage and streams of raw sewage. A few enterprising residents have opened vegetable stands, tailor shops, carpentry mills and teahouses in tiny shacks.

Aid groups run primary schools in Korail and other slums, but many children work or stay home to mind younger siblings while their parents work.

Child trafficking and arson are serious problems, experts here say. Ms. Noor says she worries she will come home one day and find her young daughters kidnapped, or worse.

“Every day I hear about a fire or about someone’s child missing,” Ms. Noor said.

Ms. Noor’s next-door neighbor, Aklima Akhter, 22, also lost her home and her family’s small market in her southern Bangladesh village to flooding caused by Cyclone Sidr.

Another neighbor, Mukhles Rahman, 38, and his brother Mohammad Farid Uddin, 56, left their village of Chawlakathi in the division of Barisal eight years ago because of river erosion.

Their family once grew rice, jute, sugar cane, mustard seed and radishes on four hectares, or 10 acres. Over a couple of decades, the Sandhya River washed away the farmland and the family home.

“My father could cross the river just by jumping across,” said Mr. Uddin, who finished high school and ran a small school in his village. “Even when I was a youngster in the 1960s, we could swim across. Now it’s so big.”

These days, the two brothers live in a tiny shanty with Mukhles Rahman’s wife and young son.

“We are trying to find another place to go, because all the land back home is dissolving,” said Mukhles Rahman, who works as a security guard at a garment factory. “But there aren’t jobs in other cities or in villages.”

For migrants displaced because of the environment, Bangladesh hopes to begin helping them find opportunities in cities other than Dhaka, said Saleemul Huq, a Bangladeshi scientist who is a senior fellow in the climate change group of the International Institute for Environment and Development in London.

Bangladesh and other countries hit hard by climate change are supposed to receive money from a $100 billion annual green climate fund approved by the negotiators at the Copenhagen summit meeting in December. Smaller amounts of aid have been pledged for the next few years. The larger amounts of environmental aid are not expected to begin flowing until 2020.

Later this year, Mr. Huq will open and lead the International Center for Climate Change and Development, an institute based just outside of Dhaka and aimed at helping vulnerable countries come up with practical ways to adapt to climate change.

“We are going to have low-lying areas in Bangladesh that are not going to be inhabitable anymore, so those people will have to go somewhere,” Mr. Huq said. While Dhaka has managed to absorb millions of migrants, he said that this “can’t go on forever. Dhaka can’t take it, and neither can the people.”

Rashida Akhter, a local manager for BRAC, a nongovernmental organization that operates across Bangladesh as well as in several other poor countries, says that more than 90 percent of the Korail slum’s residents never leave because they cannot save enough money to move.

Ms. Noor and Mr. Hawladar say they cannot imagine growing old in a dank, depressing place like Korail. They still dream about returning to their home village of Nandikathi, a poor, waterlogged hamlet of about 3,000 people.

“It’s our home, not Dhaka” Mr. Hawladar said.

Their 6-year-old son is in Nandikathi with his grandmother. They have not seen him for a year. If they lived there, their daughters, ages 8 and 3, would be able to go to school, instead of being stuck alone all day in a tiny rented shack.

Ms. Noor, who remembers a modest but more comfortable life in Nandikathi, talks about rebuilding the family’s shattered hut and reviving her drowned backyard garden of greens and gourds.

Mr. Hawladar says he wants to open another market there and add a tea house. He was badly injured in a road accident a few years ago and cannot do physical labor, so he spends 15-hour days in a wooden roadside stall in an affluent Dhaka neighborhood, brewing tea for businessmen. He makes 150 taka, or $2, a day. Ms. Noor makes about $1 a day at the garment factory.

They count their earnings at night, in silence, on the wooden plank that serves as the family bed. They never have enough money.

Even if they could save enough money to rebuild their home, the prospects are bleak in Nandikathi. The nearby Dhanshiri River has become more unruly, eroding land and livelihoods.

Ms. Noor says she sometimes stays up until the morning, worrying that the next big flood will just wash the village away.

“Where will people live then?” she asked.

Joanna Kakissis reported with the help of a grant from the International Reporting Project. Sumon Kaiser of bdnews24.com contributed reporting.


Read more!