Best of our wild blogs: 16 Nov 08


Semakau has another new star
on the discovery blog and manta blog

More shore works for the Sentosa IR
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Shore check ups: Labrador and Sentosa
Massive works near Labrador Nature Reserve and at Sentosa on the wild shores of Singapore blog

Sentosa blue spotted fantail ray
a video clip on the sgbeachbum blog

Cyrene Deathstar
on the annotated budak blog

The Crabby side of Cyrene
crusty adventures on the annotated budak blog

Orange-bellied Flowerpecker eating fruit of Indian cherry
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Common Kingfisher doing a head turn
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Attitude towards Biological Conservation
on the Psychedelic Nature blog

Corals survive acid oceans by switching to soft-bodied mode
on the Not Exactly Rocket Science blog


Read more!

Malaysian oceana­rium resort in Mabul, Sabah faces opposition

Concern over Mabul resort plan
P. Katharason, The Star 16 Nov 08;

SEMPORNA: A plan to build Malay­sia’s first and biggest oceana­rium resort of luxury chalets in Mabul, in the east coast of Sabah, is facing a wave of opposition.

Environmentalists, villagers and dive operators warn that the proposed project on a 33ha parcel of shallows will bring disaster to Mabul marine life and may also degrade the eco-sensitive coral reefs of Pulau Sipadan, a 20-minute boat ride away.

Application for a 99-year lease for the parcel facing south of Sipadan was first put in by a local company based in Kota Kinabalu in September last year.

The Semporna Assistant Collector of Land Revenue approved the application early this year and the Sabah Cabinet endorsed it last month, according to state officials.

They said the project was supposed to be undertaken by a local and Japanese joint venture based on an environment-friendly building concept.

Work will only commence after a thorough study of the environment impact assessment report.

The sources added that the oceanarium would be surrounded by five villages of more than 200 sea-view bungalows and semi-detached villas, with side pools and spa villas as well as staff and scientist quarters.

Sabah Environment Protection Association president Wong Tack asked if the oceanarium was necessary because one could easily see fishes swimming in the clear Mabul waters.

“How can approval be given to such a massive project before the terms of the EIA are known?” he asked.

Citing scientific studies of corals in tourism islands such as Fiji and elsewhere, Wong said any major construction activity in the shallows is bound to have negative impact on the reefs.

He added that tonnes of construction material would have to be brought in by barge and sand pumped in from the shores of the island, thus heavily impacting the rich exotic Mabul marine life.

Wong said the authority that approved the resort project should remember what happened in Sipadan in 2006 when a construction barge ran aground, destroying a coral reef patch the size of three tennis courts and putting Malaysia in a bad light.

He said the existing four resorts for higher-bracket tourists and five to 10 home-stay places for backpackers with a total of more than 250 rooms provided enough accommodation for 120 divers given permits to dive in Sipadan waters every day.

Wong said the 2,000 local Bajau and Suluk villagers living on Mabul island were also worried about relocation and that their historic grave site would be removed to make way for the oceanarium resort project.

New resort accused of threatening Malaysia's top dive spot
AFP 18 Nov 08;

KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) — An oceanarium resort planned near the world-famous Sipadan diving spot off Malaysian Borneo could spell disaster for the region's delicate coral reefs, environmentalists said Tuesday.

The plan for the huge resort, complete with an artificial reef and research facilities, has also come under attack from indigenous Bajau or "sea gypsies" who say it infringes on their native rights.

The oceanarium resort is slated to be built on a 33-hectare (82-acre) site on Mabul island, located just next to Sipadan, which is famous for its coral reefs, teeming sea life and crystal clear waters.

Reports said plans for the resort, touted as "a marine habitat wonder," include fake sea grass and other devices to attract fish, as well as the construction of swimming pools and more than 200 bungalows and villas.

Environmentalists have criticised the plan, which will require tonnes of construction materials to be brought in by barges, saying it could destroy the island's marine life and degrade the corals off nearby Sipadan.

Sabah Environmental Protection Association president Wong Teck said there were fears of a repeat of a 2006 accident on Sipadan when a construction barge ran aground, destroying a coral reef patch the size of three tennis courts.

"Mabul has an extremely sensitive marine ecology and the plan for a new oceanarium is certain to affect the environment there badly," he told AFP.

"An increase in the number of people staying on the island as a result of the resort and the amount of waste created, in addition to the construction work right on the coral and shallows, are almost certain to destroy much of it."

"It is definitely not environmentally sustainable and the whole idea of an oceanarium seems quite strange given that people can already see all the fish and sealife in the pristine clear waters without the need for such a facility."

Bajau villager Fung Haji Sappari also opposed the project, telling the Star newspaper that his people have had customary rights over the land as they have been using the area for fishing, transport and passage for hundreds of years.

"How can they do it? Several years ago I also applied for 15 acres around the same spot. It was not approved," he told the daily.

Fung said more than 2,000 villagers on the island feared being moved out once the project was complete as the local land office considered them to be squatters.

The Star quoted officials as saying the state cabinet had approved the resort on condition that the project managers would conserve and repair the coral reefs.

However, it said the developers would have to get approval for the project's environmental impact assessment before they can begin work.

Concerns over environmental damage on Sipadan prompted the closure of five dive resorts on the island in 2005, and most visitors now stay on Mabul and travel to the Sipadan reefs by boat.


Read more!

City-bred Singapore entrepreneurs taking up the kelong business

Big Splash
Some city-bred Singapore entrepreneurs have fallen hook , line and sinker for the simple life in kelongs
Tan Dawn Wei, Straits Times 16 Nov 08;

Singapore's new breed of fish farmers are nothing like the weather-beaten, leather-skinned fishermen who call kelongs their home.

Instead, think smart-suited, well-educated professional urbanites more used to nibbling on sashimi in fancy Japanese restaurants than producing the fish it comes from at offshore floating farms.

The constant smell of fish, heavy lifting and toiling in the hot sun mean it is not a glamorous job.

But over the past five years, an influx of these city folk have joined Singapore's small but burgeoning fishing industry and taken to life on kelongs.

Doctors, IT professionals, academics and others have been lured in part by the romantic notion of having a property out at sea, in part by possible riches to be netted.

The fish farming industry here - known as aquaculture - produced 4,500 tonnes of what is called 'foodfish' worth $13.7 million last year.

Showing the huge potential for growth, this is only 4.5 per cent of the fish consumed annually here. The rest is imported.

From just 40 offshore farms in 1985, there are now 104 coastal fish farms on the Singapore side of the East and West Johor Straits.

They produce various species of fish such as greasy grouper, golden snapper and pompano, as well as green mussels, spiny lobsters, mangrove crabs, and tiger and banana shrimps.

In July this year, another fish species, cobia, created much buzz when the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) announced it was ready for harvest.

Also known as the black kingfish, it is the sixth species of fish found suitable by the AVA to be introduced to local farmers since the 1970s.

The first batch will be harvested from Changi Fishery, which is owned by a surgeon and his wife.

AVA has been a key driver in boosting the fish farm industry. It has licensed more fish farms and provided technical advice and support to farmers - both veterans and the newbies - on production, disease management and control.

The new breed of farmers especially are receptive to new ideas, says AVA's head of marine aquaculture, Ms Wee Joo Yong.

She says: 'Good management is one of the keys to successful farming, and with access to information, technology and new mindset, these farms have what it takes to be successful.'

These fishermen are a close-knit bunch of about a dozen who meet regularly to exchange notes.

LifeStyle goes out to sea to meet a few of them.

Keeping afloat
Straits Times 16 Nov 08;

Fishing for something to do in retirement, junior college principal Maureen Ng chanced on a classified advertisement saying 'Kelong for sale. Price: $60,000'.

She was hooked. Now, four years later, Mrs Ng, 60, and her equally middle-class hubby, Timothy, 62, are proud owners of 2 Jays, a kelong platform off Pulau Ubin.

'I'm a risk-taker, I've always liked the sea and I wanted us both to have a mental and physical challenge,' said Mrs Ng, former principal of National Junior College and director of the Regional Language Centre.

Mr Ng was the Inland Revenue Authority's deputy commissioner.

Once the excitement of owning a kelong had worn off, they had to figure out how not to keel over, investment-wise. For starters, the ex-owner promised he would show them the ropes.

Still, it was a steep learning curve. The Ngs knew next to nothing about fishing or aquaculture. They had to get a boat licence, buy the boat and stock up on sunblock.

The smell of fish took some getting used to, as did waking up as early as 3am to haul in the nets. They have just one employee at the farm.

Their bigger challenge was keeping the fingerlings, or young fish, from dying in the floating netcage, a common problem in aquaculture.

The Ngs, who produce tiger groupers, seabass and cobia for sale to a local distributor, say they are now 'keeping afloat'.

They have sunk $200,000 into their kelong, named after their adult twin daughters Josephine and Joceyln.

They have bigger plans. 'The next phase is to make big bucks,' said Mrs Ng, laughing. They are working with fellow fish farmers to find local and overseas markets where they can supply large quantities of fish on a regular basis.

'If we can get the price we want, we can earn two to three times what we put in,' she said.

The couple live in a semi-detached house in Upper Thomson Road, but spend their weekends at their kelong and enjoy being simple fisherfolk.

They put beds in its three bedrooms, brought in a TV, installed a kitchen and a bathroom, and even plan to set up solar panels to power lights and a freezer.

'It's a pleasant lifestyle,' said Mrs Ng.

From sales to sails
The Straits Times 16 Nov 08;

By day, they used to sell cars from the cool comfort of a showroom near the city.

When evening fell, former colleagues Dennis Tan, 35, Iskandar Muhammad, 33, and Edison Neo, 36, would swop their shirts and ties for tatty T-shirts and head to their floating fish farm off Pasir Ris.

There, they let their hands do most of the talking: feeding tiger groupers, slicing fish - fodder for the groupers - and mending nets.

Their neighbours, all seasoned fishermen, view the men, who are the youngest in the aquaculture business here, with some amusement.

'They say, 'got nice air-con office ah, but don't want to enjoy',' Mr Tan said with a laugh.

Added Mr Neo: 'But I think they like us. We're new blood in the market.'

Last month, Mr Tan and Mr Neo quit their car salesmen jobs to focus full-time on the farm.

They, Mr Iskandar and another partner and former colleague, Mr Peter Tan, 48, bought the farm in September last year, each chipping in $20,000.

All except Mr Iskandar, 33, are married with kids. Three of them live in HDB flats, while Mr Neo lives in a condominium.

Mr Peter Tan was in the seafood import and export business and saw the farm as a good business opportunity as he felt there was a shortage of fresh seafood.

Each partner brings to the table his own speciality: Mr Peter Tan is the industry guy; Mr Iskandar is the go-to guy about fishing, traps and devices; Mr Dennis Tan is the handyman, while Mr Neo holds the purse-strings.

They have acquired more than a few bruises and scars. Mr Dennis Tan has even lost 16kg in the past year, thanks to the manual work he has put in.

They have also found themselves going from being urbanites to greenies. They wash dishes with rainwater, start the power generator only when it is nearly pitch dark and recycle things.

'We are karung guni (rag and bone) men now,' said Mr Dennis Tan.

In the kelong kitchen, meals are usually just instant noodles.

The guys go to the farm every day and sometimes stay overnight, sleeping in the platform's five rooms.

Their dream is to build a fish farm that is turbine- or solar energy- powered.

But for now, they are content to watch the sun set over the sea.

What they have now, they say, is a 360-degree sea view. 'It's priceless, better than a District 9 condo,' said Mr Iskandar.

Shower in the rain
The Straits Times 16 Nov 08;

He answered the call of the sea - and lost three mobile phones, when he fell into the water thrice.

A typical landlubber, Mr Lee Van Voon was described as 'nuts' by friends when he told them he wanted to be a fish farmer.

But the 42-year-old owner of a tools and hardware distribution company persevered.

Ever the businessman, he prefers to be called an 'aqua entrepreneur' out to transform a 'backyard industry' into a multi-million-dollar aquaculture business.

His foray started when, while shopping for a weekend home, he and his business partner, a medical doctor, came across an ad selling a kelong near Pulau Ubin.

That was a year ago.

They saw the kelong, liked it and bought it, together with Mr Lee's wife. They have pumped $300,000 into the business which breeds and farms tiger groupers, seabass and cobia, among others.

Mr Lee does not expect the kelong and its adjoining sea farm - together called Stamford Raffles Marine Culture - to be profitable for another year or two, but he is on the lookout for more investors and expects the tide to turn.

He also has his share of fishermen's tales.

Having grown up in a Choa Chu Kang kampung, the father of two young girls aged eight and five realised that his landlubber ways did not quite cut it out at sea.

For his crash course in fish farming, he went online, subscribed to industry magazines and called on the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority for advice.

He is now a few shades darker from the sun. He has accidentally sliced off the tendon on his little finger while cutting up fish.

And he has come to enjoy being out at sea, although he does not spend all his nights there.

'You don't have deadlines to meet. On land, I feel everything is so hectic.

'There's no air-con, no clean water, you only shower when it rains,' he said of the adjustments he has had to make. 'But I don't have to wash the toilet.'


Read more!

NEA allows flexibility to implement recycling receptacles

Lynda Hong, Channel NewsAsia 15 Nov 08

SINGAPORE: As part of the Singapore Green Plan, which aims to up recycling rate from the current 54 per cent to 60 per cent by 2012, recycling receptacles are made mandatory in condominiums and private apartments from Nov 1.

Condominiums and private apartments have till May 2009 to put in place recycling receptacles, which can be in the form of recycling bins, bags or even a separate chute.

At an event to mark Recycling Day on Saturday, Minister for Environment and Water Resources, Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, said the National Environment Agency has consulted private estates on what is the most suitable way for each household to handle the recyclables.

He said: "We want to allow each condominium to customise according to their own needs. I think they need to talk to the household owners. Rather than having a one-size fit all, let's measure by outcome and let them find solution."

- CNA/yt


Read more!

California ordered to prepare for sea-level rise

Reuters 14 Nov 08;

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Friday ordered preparations for rising sea levels from global warming, a startling prospect for the most populous U.S. state with a Pacific Ocean coastline stretching more than 800 miles.

Recorded sea levels rose 7 inches during the 20th century in San Francisco, Schwarzenegger said in the executive order for study of how much more the sea could rise, what other consequences of global warming were coming and how the state should react.

California is considered the environmental vanguard of government in the United States, with its own standards for car pollution and a law to cut emissions of carbon dioxide, the main gas contributing to global warming.

"The longer that California delays planning and adapting to sea level rise the more expensive and difficult adaptation will be," Schwarzenegger said, ordering a report by the end of 2010.

(Reporting by Peter Henderson; Editing by Peter Cooney)

California to Plan Climate Change Strategy
Felicity Barringer, The New York Times 16 Nov 08;

SAN FRANCISCO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has instructed state agencies to prepare for climate change, especially rising seas, as they plan to replace, upgrade and repair the system of pipelines that distributes water around sewage treatment plants and low-lying airports, among other things.

“We have to adapt the way we work and plan in order to manage the impacts and challenges that California and our entire planet face from climate change,” Mr. Schwarzenegger, a Republican, said on Friday after issuing the executive order.

Other jurisdictions, including Florida, Maryland and New York City, are also looking at the future with an eye toward climate change, but California officials believe this order goes further in calling for both studies and actions.

“We’ve got a huge budget deficit,” said Anthony Brunello, deputy secretary for climate change and energy at the California Resources Agency. “We don’t want to be investing in infrastructure that could be underwater in 20 to 30 years.”

The executive order came a day after the release of a report by an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, predicting that the state, if it fails to act, could suffer tens of billions of dollars in damage to its real estate, transportation systems and industries from water, fire and other climate-driven calamities by the century’s end.

An example of vulnerable systems, Mr. Brunello said, is the infrastructure of pipes and canals that deliver fresh water from the Sierra Nevada snowmelt to communities and agricultural areas from the San Francisco Bay Area to the southern part of the Central Valley. A rise in the sea level could mean the inundation of these freshwater systems with salt water.

Under the order, the state, he said, would first request a scientific study of its specific vulnerabilities from the National Academy of Sciences, then use the data, expected to be ready by 2010, as the basis for long-term planning. At the same time, state agencies are directed to begin preparing recommended strategies for coping with rising seas, using various models for how high the water would rise.

The order may be the country’s most sweeping in pushing state agencies for concrete plans, but it is not alone in its examination of the problem. In April 2007, Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland, a Democrat, established a climate change task force with the assignment of determining how to reduce the state’s emission of greenhouse gases and assessing the its vulnerabilities.

Washington State agencies have also been sketching out plans for anticipating a rise in the sea level, including raising the height of the wharves at the Port of Tacoma.

Governor tells staff to prepare for warming
Matthew Yi, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau SF Gate 15 Nov 08;

(11-15) 04:00 PST Sacramento --

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed an executive order Friday directing state agencies to study the effects of global warming and recommend how the state needs to adapt to such changes in land use planning and building new infrastructure.

"Given the serious threat of sea level rise to California's water supply, population and our economy, it's critically important that we make sure the state is prepared," Schwarzenegger said in a written statement.

The executive order was signed after a conference Friday in Long Beach on global warming and water infrastructure that was sponsored in part by the state Department of Water Resources, said Tony Brunello, a deputy secretary for climate change and energy for the state Resources Agency.

While California has embarked on an ambitious goal to reduce greenhouse gases that cause global warming, the effects of climate change - higher temperatures, less precipitation and higher sea levels - are inevitable, Brunello said.

Two years ago, Schwarzenegger signed the landmark legislation AB32, which requires the state to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by 2020. The California Air Resources Board, which has been charged with implementing AB32's goals, is set to consider Thursday its draft blueprint on how to limit California's greenhouse gas emissions.

"But even if we were to stop emitting greenhouse gases in California today ... the carbons that have already been emitted would still be with us and those impacts are still going to happen," Brunello said.

He said that while figuring out how to limit green house gas emissions has been receiving a lot of attention, how to adapt to the changing climate has been largely ignored. And while there are other states and nations that are researching how to adapt to the effects of global warming, Schwarzenegger's order is among the first directing agencies to put together a comprehensive plan, he said.

The executive order directs the Department of Water Resources, the California Energy Commission and the state's coastal management agencies to submit a request with the National Academy of Sciences for a sea level rise assessment report to be completed by Dec. 1, 2010.

The order also requires state agencies that build new infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, to factor in rising sea levels in their planning.

The governor also wants the California Department of Transportation to figure out which transportation projects would be vulnerable to the effects of climate change and has ordered that state agencies use a uniform standard in measuring the effects of climate change. He has also asked state agencies to develop a process on how to better coordinate planning efforts in the future.

Bill Magavern, a lobbyist for the Sierra Club, said he agrees with the governor's notion that the state needs to prepare for climate change.

"He's doing the right thing by calling for sound science and coordination among different government agencies," he said. "As we see impacts like rising sea levels and diminishing snowpack, we're going to have to adapt."


Read more!

Insecticide! An ecological disaster that will affect us all

The Independent 15 Nov 08;

While the plight of mammals and birds commands the world's attention, insects are quietly but rapidly disappearing. Michael McCarthy explains why their loss is bad news for the planet

It is a realisation that may be dawning at last: the importance of the little things that rule the world. The great American biologist, E O Wilson, said insects were world-rulers, but although they play a central role in maintaining ecosystems and the whole web of life, most insects have long been viewed with distaste or even revulsion as creepie-crawlies (apart from butterflies, which have been viewed as something akin to honorary mini-birds).

But the recent alarms in Britain, Europe and America about the fate of the honey bee – colonies have been crashing in increasing numbers – have started to open people's eyes to insects' importance in a more general way, says Matt Shardlow, director of Buglife, the Invertebrate Conservation Trust.

But it is only the beginning of an understanding, he says, and much more is needed if we are to take the action necessary to preserve our populations of insects and other invertebrates, the creatures without backbones which make up the majority of animal life, including snails, worms and spiders (spiders being arachnids, not insects).

The population declines among invertebrates in general and insects in particular are now greater than among any other group of living things, greater than declines in mammals, birds and plants. Yet although people get excited about endangered pandas, or eagles, or orchids, endangered insects generally remain below the level of their perception, Mr Shardlow says.

"There was a book published in the early 1990s called Insect Conservation, a Neglected Green Issue, and it remains the case that levels of awareness of what's happening with the small things, such as insects, are much lower than with what's happening with big things, such as trees, or birds, or whales," he says. "The bigger you are, the bigger the bit of wildlife, the greater the chance that people will be paying attention to what's happening to you.

"There are more extinctions among invertebrates than in any other groups, and a greater proportion of the species are in decline, and the decline is steeper, than in plants, birds and mammals, wherever there is data."

There is clear evidence of the sharp decline in Britain's insects, one being the disappearance of the "moth snowstorm". Anyone over 40 will probably remember that during a car journey at night in midsummer, the moths in the headlights were so numerous that they looked like snow, and the windscreen would become so coated with colliding moths that by the end of the journey it would have to be washed.

Not any more. Moth snowstorms are today moth showers, if that: the phenomenon has all but disappeared, and this is robustly backed up by the figures. Two-thirds of Britain's individual moth species have declined in the past 40 years, some by enormous amounts, and moths as a whole have lost about a third of their abundance in that period. We know this because, since 1968 the agricultural research station at Rothamsted in Hertfordshire has maintained a substantial network of moth traps around the country (at about 80 sites) to which the insects are attracted at night by a light-bulb. Types and numbers caught are carefully noted, and with long-term records for no fewer than 337 species of larger moths over four decades, this is one of the biggest sets of animal population data in the world. Analysis in 2003 showed more than 200 species had declined, and nearly 70 by more than 50 per cent. Species once well-known and abundant were tumbling: the magpie moth had declined by 69 per cent, the cinnabar moth by 83 per cent and the strikingly handsome garden tiger moth by no less than 89 per cent.

Yet it is the same story with butterflies. Thanks to another impeccably-kept set of long-term data, from the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme run by the charity Butterfly Conservation and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, we know that seven out of 10 of Britain's 58 species have declined in the past 30 years, some by amounts so large they are on the road to extinction.

Widespread and formerly common species such as the grayling and the wall brown have dropped in numbers by 40 per cent and more, vanishing from large areas, while others have suffered catastrophic losses. The duke of burgundy has fallen by 52 per cent, the pearl-bordered fritillary by 61 per cent, the wood white by 65 per cent and the high brown fritillary, Britain's most endangered butterly, by 79 per cent. Now there is another concern for an insect which a generation ago was the most familiar "pretty" butterfly, the small tortoiseshell. Hit hard by a parasitic fly which has come in from southern Europe, its population across Britain has dropped by 52 per cent since 1990, but in the South-east it has gone down by no less than 82 per cent over the period.

These declines are parallelled in bumblebees. Of the 25 species traditionally native to Britain, three have gone extinct, the apple bumblebee, Cullum's bumblebee and most recently, the short-haired bumblebee, and four more are designated "UK Biodiversity Action Plan species" in recognition of their precarious situation, the great yellow bumblebee, the brown-banded carder bee, the shrill carder bee and the ruderal bumblebee. Several more species, such as the bilberry bumblebee and the moss carder bee, have undergone major population contractions.

There is simply no accurate population trend data for many other groups of insects but there are ominous signs that they too are plunging. Mayflies, the river flies on which flyfishermen base their artificial imitations, appear to have dropped in abundance by about two-thirds in the past 50 years, a widespread survey of fishermen in 2000 showed. Britain's 46 species of ladybirds may now be widely at risk from an Asian invader, the harlequin ladybird, which arrived in Britain in 2004, and not only outcompetes other ladybirds for food, but eats them directly. As for beetles, there may be more than 4,000 species in Britain, but an indication of their decline is the fact that at least 250 of them have not been seen since 1970. Buglife revealed this two years ago, judging that some were merely hard to find, but others were rapidly heading for extinction. Four vividly-named species which are on the Government's Biodiversity Action Plan priority list have already disappeared: the Pashford pot beetle, the four-signed ground beetle, the Sussex diving beetle and the familiar sunshiner.

"A very severe problem is that many invertebrates are highly specialised in what they require," Matt Shardlow says. "They can't just live anywhere, they need a specific habitat feature, and often these habitat features are now highly fragmented and isolated, such as fenlands, or ancient woodland.

"Take dead wood; the decayed stumps and fallen trees which used to be seen throughout the countryside have now largely been tidied away, and we've lost all this connectivity in terms of dead wood. Some species may now be found only on two to three to four sites, which maybe hundreds of miles apart

"The violet click beetle would be a classic one. It is an internationally protected species found only in Windsor Great Park and on Bredon Hill in Worcestershire. If it goes extinct in the one place, it won't be able to recolonise it from the other; the sites are just too far apart. That's an extreme example, but at a smaller level, that's happening with hundreds of species in the UK."

Mr Shardlow does think that the recent scares about honey bees and the catastrophic damage their disappearance would do to the process of plant pollination have had an affect on people's awareness. "People are just starting to twig that insects are quite symbolic," he said. "They're twigging about pollinators, and noticing about honey bees.

"But they haven't yet twigged that pollination needs more than just honeybees. There are a whole set of different species, including beetles and flies, which are also undertaking unique and different pollination roles. You can't fix pollination by saving one species. You have to save the full gamut of invertebrate diversity. Insects are fundamental to the fabric of life, and if we start to tear that fabric apart, the consequences for all of the services that are provided from ecosystems will be severe."

Garden tiger moth

Arctia caja

One of the most attractive of all British insects, once well-known for its hairy "woolly bear" caterpillars, the garden tiger moth has declined spectacularly, falling in numbers by 89 per cent in the past 30 years

Violet click beetle

Limoniscus violaceus

So called from its habit of springing up, with a click if it falls on its back, this is now one of our rarest creatures, found only in Windsor Great Park in Berkshire and Bredon Hill in Worcestershire

Cinnabar moth

Tyria jacobaeae

The yellow and black caterpillars of the cinnabar used to be a familiar sight feeding on ragwort, but not any more. Numbers of this handsome black and red moth have tumbled in the past 30 years, by 83 per cent

Mayfly

Ephemera danica

This is the largest and most beautiful of Britain's 50 or so species of upwing flies, found on rivers and famously food for trout, all of which are declining, perhaps by as much as two-thirds in recent decades

High brown fritillary

Argynnis adippe

Since the 1950s, the high brown fritillary has undergone a dramatic decline of nearly 80 per cent. It is now confined to about 50 sites, where conservationists are working to save it from extinction

Brown-banded carder bee

Bombus humilis

Tawny-coloured with a brown band on the upper abdomen, it is one of the most endangered of Britain's 24 species of bumblebee. Once widespread, it is now very local

Small tortoiseshell

Aglais urticae

Even 20 years ago this was the commonest "pretty" butterfly but it is now crashing in numbers, perhaps because of a pararsitic fly from Europe. Abundance down by more than half

Ruderal bumblebee

Bombus ruderatus

The ruderal or large garden bumble-bee was common in southern England a century ago, but is now only in East Anglia. Black with two yellow bands on the thorax, a single yellow band on the abdomen, and a white tail


Read more!

500,000 deer must be culled to protect UK countryside from damage by herds

Culls of half a million deer are needed to protect Britain's countryside from being damaged by increasingly large herds of the animals.

Jasper Copping, The Telegraph 15 Nov 08;

Deer numbers have soared thanks to a series of mild winters, tree-planting schemes and an absence of natural predators. They are thought to be at their highest level for almost 1,000 years.

But wildlife experts and farmers have warned that they are wreaking havoc in many areas, destroying woodland, crops and even gardens.

Now, the Deer Initiative, a government-backed organisation which advises landowners on how to manage the animals, has said it would like to see the numbers culled increase drastically to half a million a year.

The organisation is involved in negotiations with landowners to co-ordinate a series of culls to take place over this winter.

Peter Watson, from the Deer Initiative, said the population of wild deer had now risen to almost two million and the numbers being culled had not kept pace with the increase.

"The current numbers being culled are not enough. We need to be culling about 500,000 deer and we are not even close to that.

"There is a significant number of lowland woodlands that are in an unsatisfactory condition because of deer impacts. It is in those areas where we are working with landowners to get the habit back into a better condition. Almost inevitably, that means culling more deer, because people haven't traditionally been culling enough.

"We're not simply calling for a huge increase in culling. We are trying to address local issues. That might mean an increase in culling, and I think it generally does. But the aim is to address the issues, not deer numbers per se."

However, the proposed increase has proved highly controversial.

John Robins, from the campaigning group Animal Concern, said: "Not enough has been done to look at alternatives to lethal control, like giving deer contraceptives.

"In some areas, current culling practices are totally unacceptable in a civilised society. We are extremely concerned that some culls are of pregnant deer and hinds when they are feeding calves."

Among the areas of England worst effected by large deer populations are East Anglia, Northamptonshire, Herefordshire, Exmoor, Oxfordshire and parts of the Midlands.

Last week, the Deer Initiative, which is funded by the government and its other partner organisations, held meetings with landowners in the east of England to discuss ways to control numbers there.

David Hooton, the organisation's regional representative, said: "In some areas, like Suffolk, Norfolk and Hertfordshire, culling has already started to increase.

"But deer management is a very gradual game and it takes a long time to get it right. What no one wants is to be indiscriminate. We need to carry out monitoring and research as well. We are not simply interested in culling, for culling's sake."

The organisation is also trying to increase the marketing of venison, to provide a further incentive for landowners to cull more deer.

Many culls have started in recent weeks, as the season for deer runs from November until the end of March.

Among the Deer Initiative's partners who carry out culls on their own land are the Forestry Commission, the National Trust and the Woodland Trust.

Culls of 500,000 would be a huge increase on current levels, which sees around 350,000 deer killed in the UK each year.

It follows warnings from wildlife experts that the mammals are having "negative impacts" across the country.

The animals have a ferocious appetite and can strip trees of bark and leaves, destroying the nesting sites of popular birds and affecting song birds such as the nightingale which rely upon the undergrowth for food. Endangered small mammals such as the dormouse also live in the thick undergrowth.

In addition, the deer have been blamed for devouring native flowers such as bluebells which provide a vital source of nectar for insects.

Deer can also transmit diseases such as bovine tuberculosis and foot-and-mouth disease to livestock and cause road accidents.

The fast growing population is thought to be the muntjac deer, which first escaped into the English countryside from Woburn Park in Bedfordshire around 100 years ago.

It is now the third most common breed of deer in Britain, behind the native roe deer and the fallow deer, which were introduced by the Normans when they invaded Britain in the 11th century. Britain's only other native deer is the red deer.


Read more!

UK recycling industry in a slump: what happened?

The Telegraph 14 Nov 08;

The once booming UK recycling industry is in crisis. Mounds of now worthless tin cans, paper and plastic bottles are piling up in warehouses, attracting rats and posing a fire risk. So what happened? Asks Jimmy Lee Shreeve.

Only a matter of months ago recycling firms could get up to £40 a tonne for waste cardboard and around £200 a tonne for discarded plastics.

The recycling industry was riding high, mostly from feeding the hungry markets for waste in the Far East.

Environment minister Jane Kennedy proudly announced that 9 out of 10 town halls were ahead of their recycling targets and the Government's hopes of recycling 40 per cent of household rubbish by 2010 were well on the way to being achieved.

The future looked rosy – until the bottom fell out of the market.

The plunge in prices was down to a sudden fall in demand for recycled materials, particularly from China, as manufacturers reduced their output in line with the global economic downturn.

In one fell swoop it rendered waste paper, aluminium cans and plastic bottles as good as worthless, and has left the UK recycling industry and local authorities reeling.

Paul White, who runs Norfolk-based waste paper merchants MW White, says the crisis is the worst he's seen in the 35 years he's been involved in running the family business.

"Six weeks ago you could sell anything you could lay your hands on," he says. "Prices were steady and in some cases rising. Six weeks later the market is decimated. It was an unbelievable turnaround in such a short space of time."

The industry and local authorities alike were taken by surprise and now there's a growing mountain of waste with no buyers to take it off their hands. "There's nowhere for these materials to go at the moment," said Steve Eminton of LetsRecycle.com. "It's rapidly becoming a serious problem."

He added that the situation was likely to get worse by Christmas, with the big surge in packaging and drinks bottles put out for recycling.

The Environment Agency which regulates waste in England and Wales, admitted that the sudden drop in demand for recyclable materials was "severe" and "unprecedented".

On November 11, with little other choice, it announced that it would make it easier for recycling companies to store material for up to six months, or even longer in exceptional circumstances.

With recycling and waste depots overflowing, the Local Government Association will be asking the government for help to pay for the warehousing of rubbish. "If we send it to landfill it will incur tax," an LGA spokesperson.

By storing recyclable waste, local authorities and recycling firms are banking on the markets picking up again.

Stuart Foster of Recoup, which advises on plastics recycling, is confident that the low value is temporary and believes that, with proper management, plastics, paper and metal products can be stored safely until they can be sold again.

"We think there's a light at the end of the tunnel," he says, "but it's going to take some work."

Not everyone is so confident. In a statement the Confederation of Paper Industries said that demand in China for waste paper would probably recover in the medium term, but warned that there were "no obvious signs of Far East buyers returning to the market soon."

The CPI added that, even if there was an upturn in demand, "it is very doubtful that prices for the material will be anywhere near where they were during the middle of 2008 and excess stored material is likely to suppress prices for a much longer period."

There is no denying that the recycling of household waste has been successful. According to Defra's annual waste statistics, released in early November, each of us is now recycling 171kg of rubbish each year, compared to 75kg five years ago, and 3kg in 1983.

Ironically, the very success of recycling could make the current situation even worse. With little chance of selling the collected materials, warehouses are likely to become stretched to capacity, not to mention attracting vermin and posing a fire risk.

"These warehouses will not be pleasant places," says Doretta Cocks of the Campaign for Weekly Waste Collections.

"Not everybody washes tins out – they will be full of old cans of beans and tins of pilchards. They will attract rats."

Then there is the question of where all the waste will go if the recycling market doesn't pick up in six months.

For Cocks the answer is obvious: "If this situation continues, I would almost guarantee that all in storage will be landfilled."

Peter Seggie, recovered paper sector manager at the Confederation of Paper Industries, echoed her concerns: "The worst-case scenario is that some material collected for recycling could go to incineration or landfill."

But in a statement on November 12 the government insisted that stored materials would only be sent to landfill as "a last resort" adding that it remains committed to ensuring that the price drop "does not undermine public confidence in the value of recycling, nor lead to unacceptable environmental consequences."

Tory MP Eric Pickles said the crisis called into question Labour's claim that recycling has soared during its time in office.

"It is the death knell to any claim that the government is green," he says. "What will be the cost to the taxpayer of storing all this rubbish? Once again we have a government policy that beggars belief."

Paul Bettison, chairman of the Local Government Association's environment board, however, wants the government to help provide more secure places for waste storage until demand recovers, and suggests the "commandeering" of unused military bases, mills and factories. He insists an increase in storage capacity is crucial if the government is to avoid reversing the progress it has made in boosting recycling rates.

"We've worked hard to get people to amend lifestyles to embrace recycling and we can't afford to get them out of that habit," Bettison says.

"They will accept that material is stored for a while before being recycled, but they will not accept the material they have put out to be recycled ending up in landfill – it will take five years to build up UK recycling capacity so in the meantime storage is the only answer."

After being let down by a private contractor for its plastic waste collections, Hertfordshire County Council was forced to take a different route to deal with the crisis – it asked residents to buy food and other goods with minimal packaging.

Councillor Derrick Ashley told the St Albans & Harpenden Review: "Residents are... encouraged to reduce or reuse their plastic waste, for example by avoiding products with excessive plastic wrapping or by using tubs for storage."

But as far as Doretta Cocks is concerned, the whole viability of recycling ought to be called into question.

"Should councils continue to collect recycling materials from householders when there is no end market?" she asks.

"I would love a return to weekly collections of general waste, but I doubt councils would consider doing so as they would not want to affect the 'behavioural change' in residents they proudly boast as a result of alternate weekly collections."

Only time will tell whether it comes to that or not. But the prognosis doesn't look promising. Paul White, for one, doesn't foresee any improvement in the situation before Easter – "and as to what happens after that, how long is a piece of string?"

He also points out that UK paper and board mills are severely overstocked, with some announcing they'll be shut for at least three weeks over the Christmas period.

"They've all got finished product coming out of their ears," says White. "But if they can't sell it now, they're not likely to move it too quickly after Christmas, what with January and February being the two slowest months of the year in our industry. There's no doubt about it, the industry is in for a very rough ride."


Read more!

US natural gas rush stirs environmental concerns

Mary Esch, Associated Press Yahoo News 15 Nov 08;

ALBANY, N.Y. – Advanced drilling techniques that blast millions of gallons of water into 400-million-year-old shale formations a mile underground are opening up "unconventional" gas fields touted as a key to the nation's energy future.

These deposits, where natural gas is so tightly locked in deep rocks that it's costly and complicated to extract, include the Barnett shale in Texas, the Fayetteville of Arkansas, and the Haynesville of Louisiana. But the mother lode is the Marcellus shale underlying the Appalachians.

Geologists call the Marcellus a "super giant" gas field. Penn State geoscientist Terry Engelder believes it could supply the natural gas needs of the United States for 14 years.

But as word spread over the past year that a 54,000-square-mile shale field from southern New York to West Virginia promised to yield a trillion dollars worth of gas, making millionaires of local landowners, environmental alarms were sounded.

Would gas wells damage water wells? Would chemicals poison groundwater? Would fabled trout streams be sucked dry? Would the pristine upstate reservoirs that supply drinking water to New York City be befouled?

"This gas well drilling could transform the heavily forested upper Delaware watershed from a wild and scenic natural habitat into an ugly industrial landscape that is forever changed," said Tracy Carluccio of Delaware Riverkeeper. She'd like a moratorium on drilling to allow an inventory of natural areas to be done first.

So loud were the protests in New York that Gov. David Paterson directed the Department of Environmental Conservation to update its oil and gas drilling regulations to reflect the advanced drilling technology, which uses millions of gallons of water and poses waste-disposal challenges.

Now, while new drilling rigs sprout in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, development of the Marcellus in New York is on hold until next year, while the DEC holds hearings and drafts regulations.

Gas developers say environmental alarms are exaggerated and New York could miss out on much-needed capital investment and jobs if it takes a heavy-handed regulatory approach.

"These are surgical operations utilizing the most advanced drilling technology known to man," Tom Price Jr., senior vice president of Chesapeake Energy, told state lawmakers in Albany at a recent hearing.

The technology that has raised concern involves horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking. Thousands of wells have been drilled and fracked in New York in the past 50 years, New York DEC Commissioner Pete Grannis said. But refinement of the technology makes it feasible to extract gas from deeper, denser shales.

The latest technology, known as "slick water fracturing," uses far more water than earlier methods — 1 million to 5 million gallons for each fracking operation, Grannis said. That fact, and the proximity of the Marcellus to New York City's watershed, prompted the regulatory review.

New York and Pennsylvania regulators promise full disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking, which industry insiders say are not hazardous. John Pinkerton, chairman and CEO of Range Resources, said used fracking fluid is no more toxic than what goes down the drain at a hair salon.

Roger Willis, who owns a hydraulic fracturing company in Meadville, Pa., said thousands of frack jobs have been done in rock formations above and below the Marcellus shale in New York state with no damage to aquifers.

Willis said frack fluids are isolated from groundwater by steel and concrete well casings. The well bore goes thousands of feet deeper than potable water supplies, through multiple layers of rock, until it reaches the gas-rich shale. Then it turns sideways and continues horizontally for several thousand feet.

The fracking fluid is blasted into the shale, opening cracks that let trapped gas escape. The fractures are held open with sand mixed with the fluid.

Flowback pipes collect the gas and used fracking fluid, which now has a high concentration of salt from the ancient sea where the shale sediments formed.

The well casings that are meant to protect groundwater have occasionally failed.

"There are going to be some problems, although they're not commonplace," said Bryan Swistock, a water resources expert from Penn State. "Laws on the books are adequate to take care of that."

Disposal of salty fracking water is problematic because of limited capacity in existing treatment plants, which can't remove salt but can only dilute it to an acceptable level for discharge into rivers. Alternatives include new recycling technologies and injection well disposal, where water is blasted back into the earth for permanent disposal.

While New York and Pennsylvania require that waste water be stored in a holding pond with an impervious liner until it's disposed of, critics fear such ponds could leak, or overflow in a rainstorm.

Susan Obleski, spokeswoman for the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, said the agency expects the gas industry could require up to 28 million gallons of water a day from the Susquehanna watershed when it ramps up.

"To put it in perspective, golf courses take about 50 million gallons a day, and nuclear power plants use 150 million gallons," Obleski said.

The concern isn't how much water is used, but where and when it's taken. Withdrawals during dry seasons or from small streams in remote areas would have a greater environmental impact than in other cases, Obleski said.

"One of the most expensive items in the drilling process is water, so the less we can use, the better," said Scott Rotruck, a Chesapeake executive. "We're finding ways to use less water, transport less water, and find ways to reuse it."


Read more!