Best of our wild blogs: 16 Feb 10


To Big Sisters With The Dukes
from colourful clouds and singapore nature and wild shores of singapore

SeaMoth and Baby @ Chek Jawa
from sgbeachbum

Two Dukes @ Lornie Trail
from Beauty of Fauna and Flora in Nature

Sponging away
from Psychedelic Nature

Feeding behaviour of the Blue-tailed Bee-eater
from Bird Ecology Study Group

PrawnWatch at Sungei Buloh: fun way to learn about mangroves!
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity!

建自然历史博物馆还差2500万
(Lianhe Zaobao, 10 February 2010) from Raffles Museum News

Wild animals found at police post: Someone must have kept them illegally from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Halophila beccarii: IUCN's Species of the Day!
from teamseagrass

Dung kicking
from Rhinomania


Read more!

Grumpy in Singapore

It may be true that everything in Singapore happens for a reason but it doesn't necessarily mean that you have to enjoy it.
Robert Leveson, The Telegraph 15 Feb 10;

More than once have I walked into walls in Singapore. I am not an idiot – well, at least I don’t think so, but then I suppose that most idiots don’t – and I have a valid reason. They were artificial ones: the kind of flimsy, freshly painted cardboard jobs that signal a change in the built environment of some kind and I wasn't expecting them to be there.

Usually it happens when I am out to eat. In Asia, most people eat out. The late evening rush hour – 6.45 to 7.20, I can be that precise within the CBD (or central business district, to those of us who prefer words) – combines a simple abundance of establishments to allow for dining at someone else’s table. I bought a wok when I arrived here over two years ago – but I have yet to unwrap it. I digress. On many sultry evenings, while swimming through the clean but heavy air, I have had to change my dinner plans because my restaurant has gone without even saying goodbye.

Living in Britain for most of my life, a nation that prides itself on the preservation and incremental change of its institutions, I am unused to continuous change. Not only do I work in one of those stable professions – teaching – and consider history a passion but I am also rather conservative by nature. I had an image of orderly Singaporeans quietly going about their fixed daily lives in my mind when I accepted my job here, flying out soon after on Boxing Day, 2007.

Since I arrived, though, I have seen the place transform. It’s a nation in perpetual motion. I live on the 12th floor of what was once the tallest apartment block in Asia. It is regarded as ancient – but it ain’t, unless 1972 is viewed as a part of the medieval period – and unique. Its horse-shoe shaped construction provides a perfect funnel for rising winds, cleverly air-conditioning the building. It will soon be up for sale and is almost inevitably going to be replaced.

In common with the billion and a half people of the great, red motherland to the north – the population is ethnically around three quarters Chinese – Singaporeans seem to view most things as transitory or dispensable. And why shouldn’t they? This dot on the map (my students were most perturbed when they failed to spot it at all on a map recently) supports 5 million souls, most of whom appear to be constantly standing in front of me. But with no natural resources, this nation has made its location and convenience its badge. It is change or die.

In 1819, when Raffles strode confidently onto the shores of a tiny island hugged by the equator, the place was a jungle. There was an exhibition recently at the National Museum that documented the history of Singapore in paintings and pictures and I realised how colonial eyes must have widened at the lush greenery before them. A few huts here and there, more than a few tigers crouching in the undergrowth, an island 25 per cent smaller than it is now (thanks to the wonders of reclaimed land). The greenery remains and this is truly a garden city. I go to sleep at night to the sound of the jungle (the park next door helps). But it is managed and orderly now, placed conveniently where it is needed. Nothing in Singapore happens by accident.

Change has its upside – convenience. You’re never too far from air-conditioning here, or somewhere to eat, or a taxi or an escalator, or a helpful citizen ready to assist you if you stand around looking stupid for long enough (there’s that idiot thing, again). If something’s too much trouble, it’s soon made easier. In some ways, it’s a revolutionary place. Plans are constantly drawn up and followed.

As Raffles did, so Singaporeans do. He had everything grouped, labelled and organised. The mouth of the river has changed beyond recognition. Three towers now reach for the sky in Marina bay, apparently balancing some sort of giant surfboard on their tips. They weren’t there when I arrived. Nor was the Formula 1 track – well, it was but it was and still is my bus route. The view from the Esplanade Theatre and Concert Hall (those twin durians were only finished in 2005) now takes in a flourishing new quay. I won’t even begin to describe what has happened to Orchard Road.

Similarly there was a huge food court (a staple here) outside my apartment complex when I moved in. Last year it disappeared while I was on holiday. I was most distressed to see the dumper trucks and diggers arrive soon after but overjoyed when they left a vast expanse of grass in their wake. They had put the park land back.

Shops have changed bi-monthly on occasions, in part I am sure due to uncertain economic climates. But, as Lee Kuan Yew (ex-PM, mentor and "father" of the nation) said to Singapore Airlines in the 1970s – "You’re on your own; sink or swim". People get chances here and they have to grab them quickly.

Much has been preserved too. I have never been anywhere with such shiny buildings. The heritage constructs are either painted bright pastel colours or as white as meringue. You could almost eat the Asian Civilisations Museum. Streets, trees and homes, all are beautifully maintained and mess is eliminated – in Singapore, you’re never more than a few feet from a mop. It is perhaps a glimpse of the future.

For someone brought up to think of change as not having pasta on a Wednesday night, it’s a lot to get used to.


Read more!

Nuclear power a key source of energy in region soon?

Green drive will see widespread use of renewable energy sources: Expert
Jessica Cheam, Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

RENEWABLE sources of energy such as wind, solar and biomass are expanding rapidly in Asia but the region could eventually see nuclear power emerge as a key source, said a visiting industry leader.

Mr Kenji Uenishi, president of energy giant GE Energy Asia Pacific, told The Straits Times last week that there is 'massive potential for nuclear energy in this region', noting that Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore have all announced feasibility studies on the issue.

The next decade could see the spread of technology from northern Asian places such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, which already use nuclear energy, towards countries in South-east Asia.

'These places have been using nuclear for a long time and that experience can be shared,' said Mr Uenishi.

But there are still hurdles to cross before nuclear energy is adopted on a massive scale, primarily due to public concerns over safety and security, added the 57-year-old.

He said that while there may not be a global deal on climate change yet, GE Energy believes the pressure on companies to reduce their carbon footprint is here to stay.

The urge to be greener and the recovering global economy are set to give the clean energy industry a boost this year.

While investments in the sector had suffered in the financial crisis, clean power remains the company's fastest growing business unit, said MrUenishi.

GE Energy, part of the General Electric conglomerate, has spent about US$850 million (S$1.2 billion) on research and development in renewable energy since it went into the business in 2002.

The company, which supplies technology for power generation and energy delivery, generated a global revenue of US$37.1 billion last year.

It set up an Asia-Pacific headquarters for commercial decision-making in Singapore in 2007, and counts Sembcorp, Singapore Power and PUB among its local clients.

It employs 5,000 staff in the region, and more than 900 in Singapore.

Tokyo-based Mr Uenishi, who was in Singapore for a regional meeting last week, said electricity demand is set to increase this year as economies recover, and so will demand for energy-related products and services.

GE Energy is aggressively expanding into 'smart grids', which monitor and distribute electricity more efficiently.

The company is in talks to participate in the Energy Market Authority's multimillion-dollar pilot project on smart grids, said Mr Uenishi, who took over the reins of GE Energy Asia Pacific in 2008.

GE Energy manufactures smart meters, which provide detailed information on energy usage, and software systems that help companies monitor the distribution of electricity in the grid.

Mr Uenishi, a 20-year veteran of the company, said GE Energy is committed to driving down the costs of cleaner, more efficient technologies so that it can be adopted on a wider scale.

The company is also focused on developing a new technology that will allow countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines to tap geothermal energy on a commercial scale, he added.

Such a project could enable Singapore to access renewable energy sources in the region - a possible area of exploration recently suggested by the Economic Strategies Committee.

'With Asia's emerging economies and growing energy demand, there are so many opportunities to develop new technologies which can contribute to society. This is what makes it exciting to be in this region now,' he said.


Read more!

Pilot project to shrink carbon footprints

Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

SIX local organisations - including two listed companies, a law firm and a university - are leading the way in measuring and managing the environmental impact of their activities.

They are doing this through an innovative online tool launched last week under a pilot project by British carbon-management consultancy The Carbon Neutral Company.

The programme, the first of its kind in Singapore, enables the organisations to specify their activities on Internet-based software, which then computes their carbon footprints.

The tool lets companies check their carbon emissions in real time, as well as helps them identify ways to reduce energy usage and save money, said Carbon Neutral's Asia Pacific managing director Rani Virdee.

The pilot programme combines CarbonView, a Web-based carbon management software tool developed by supply chain consultancy Viewlocity, with the carbon reduction expertise of The Carbon Neutral Company, said Ms Virdee.

A build-up of greenhouse gases has been widely blamed for climate change, a growing concern and a key global agenda item in recent years.

Companies have increasingly come under pressure to account for and reduce their environmental impact.

The six entities involved in the latest project are: mainboard-listed property developer City Developments and Pan-United Concrete, law firm WongPartnership, trading firm Jebsen & Jessen (SEA), ship repair firm Drydocks World Singapore and the National University of Singapore.

All except NUS paid to join the programme, with the fee based on the organisation's size.

WongPartnership managing director Dilhan Pillay Sandrasegara said the firm, which has a 'green force' to brainstorm ways to reduce its carbon footprint, was excited about being the first law firm in the pilot programme.

Carbon Neutral's pilot project is supported by the Economic Development Board, under its urban solutions programme.

EDB's director for clean-tech and urban solutions Goh Chee Kiong noted that, as a small and highly urbanised nation, Singapore needs carbon management to enhance its competitiveness in an increasingly carbon-constrained global economy.

'This pilot programme not only has the potential to address Singapore's emission reduction needs but can also be scaled up for use in other cities and countries,' said Mr Goh.

Singapore Environment Council executive director Howard Shaw said the pilot was 'a move in the right direction, as we're moving into a new era where carbon disclosure will become a necessary part of business reporting'.

Such tools, however, should be rigorously tested to ensure accuracy and standards, he added.

'There still needs to be a degree of standardisation in terms of carbon emission measurement,' he said.

Ever since the pilot programme was launched, Carbon Neutral has seen more interest from local companies, said Ms Virdee.

'Our experience shows us that organisations that implement carbon reduction programmes benefit from reducing operational costs, winning more business and enhancing their corporate reputation,' she added.

JESSICA CHEAM


Read more!

Not your typical tiger

Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

Among insects from butterflies to beetles, fish and flora and fauna, some have taken on the name 'tiger' because of their appearance or ferocious personalities. And a number can be found right here.





Read more!

Teams to survey Australia's biodiversity

Adam Bennett, AAP The Sydney Morning Herald 15 Feb 10;

Scientists and volunteers will spend the next three years surveying the far-flung corners of the continent to find the missing pieces of Australia's animal and plant diversity.

The $10 million Bush Blitz program will send research teams to remote national reserves throughout the country in a search for new species, and to better document those already known.

Groups of 10 to 12 scientists, together with volunteer "citizen scientists" and support staff, will conduct six major surveys each year.

In the process the teams will be building a better snapshot of the plant and animal life in the national reserves, which make up 11 per cent of Australia's land mass.

Launching the program at a national reserve in Darkwood in northern NSW, Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the surveys would help uncover some of the thousands of native species that have yet to be documented.

"Bush Blitz is nature discovery on a huge scale - teams of scientists will scour hundreds of reserves and expect to find hundreds of species that are completely new to science," he said.

"Australia is home to more than 560,000 native species, many found nowhere else on earth, yet only one quarter of this biodiversity has been scientifically documented."

Mr Garrett toured a survey camp at Darkwood, in the New England National Park, where he was introduced to a recently caught barred frog, a swain's leaf-tailed gecko, a golden crown snake and a brown tree snake.

"Quite often we have a sense that the environment is under some pressure and threat and that's true," and at times squeamish Mr Garrett said.

"But what we don't have as much of a sense of is the already great expanse of species there. That is becoming filled in with this type of scientific effort."

The program has been jointly funded by the federal government, which chipped in $6 million, and miner BHP Billiton, who has made a $4 million contribution.

International conservation group Earthwatch will help manage the research sites, and co-ordinate the volunteer "citizen scientists".

Earthwatch Australia's Executive Director, Richard Gilmore, said it was those volunteers, and links with government and business, that made such a large project possible.

"The national reserve system is larger in area than Germany, England and New Zealand combined," Mr Gilmore said.

"(Bush Blitz is) bringing together business, and community groups, and government, and volunteers, in a way that probably hasn't been done before. This is an important large-scale project that just couldn't be done by one group, or by scientists alone."

Scientist Frank Lemckert, from the NSW government body Industry and Investment NSW, said Bush Blitz would travel to areas usually ignored by researchers.

"This program is going to go to a whole lot of areas you wouldn't usually go to, and it is not just going to look at the charismatic, fluffy, furry things," he said.

"These surveyors will look at everything."

Dr Lemckert said the information gathered would help future conservation efforts.

"It's really about knowing about the environment that we have and that we came here with is being protected, so our children have what we have," he said.

"If we don't know it's there, we're not going to be able to save it. Until we actually understand them we can't conserve them, so this survey will be a chance to do that, so we can leave behind for our children and their children the same legacy that we have ourselves. I don't want to say, "Sorry kids, I saw it, but you didn't."


Read more!

Wetlands not wastelands: Setiu Wetlands in Terengganu

Harban Singh, Johor Baru
Letter to the New Straits Times 16 Feb 10;

THE east coast states of the peninsula are home to some of the finest coastlines, national parks and serene islands in Malaysia.

These coastlines have a rich heritage and beautiful natural attractions. Tourism is a potential earner in these states, and more can be done to lure avid nature lovers.

One of the many potential sites in the east coast is the Setiu Wetlands in Terengganu, which has both freshwater and marine species. The Setiu Wetlands supplies between 50 and 60 per cent of Peninsular Malaysia's grouper (Epinephelus spp) juveniles and oyster seeds.

It is, therefore, most disappointing to hear that a 1,000ha aquaculture development project has been approved in Setiu for an integrated shrimp project. This is in total disregard to the vital role of the wetlands to human habitats and livelihoods. Aquaculture projects have destroyed much of the wetlands, especially mangroves, in Thailand and Indonesia. It has led to environmental degradation, ecological damage and caused much pain to the socio-economic position of the local communities. Malaysia must learn from it.

We must preserve these important ecosystems where Malaysian Nature Society and World Wide Fund for Nature have done tremendous field and research work and accumulated valuable data as well as inventories to justify protection. The wetlands qualify to be designated as Ramsar (wetlands of international importance) sites by virtue of their distinctive habitats. Nature lovers are expecting this area to join Tasek Bera, Kinabatangan, Kuching wetlands, Tanjung Piai, Sungai Pulai and Pulau Kukup as the seventh Ramsar site in Malaysia.

The East Coast Economic Region (ECER) authorities, the custodians of this area, have a moral obligation to ensure that all green habitats are protected, through sustainable approaches. It is never too late to rectify a mistake and consult the experts. Setiu should be gazetted as a state park and a Ramsar site, as was done with Pulau Kukup and Tanjung Piai wetlands sites in Johor. Perhaps the ECER could learn from the Iskandar Regional Development Authority how to work with stakeholders to preserve and enhance wetlands. The proposed aquaculture project must be shelved. We don't need more white elephants in Terengganu. We must learn from our past mistakes and recognise that wetlands are not wastelands, but form one of the most productive ecosystems in the world.


Read more!

"Firefly colonies in Malaysia are disappearing even before they are identified"

Keeping the lights on
Sharmilla Ganesa, The Star 16 Feb 10;

Some firefly colonies are disappearing even before they are identified, alongside destruction of their habitats by pollution and riverine development.

THE sight of several thousand fireflies twinkling along a riverbank is a magical experience, one that draws in tourists, both local and foreign. Malaysia is one of the few South-East Asian countries with fireflies that congregate on “display trees” along both sides of mangrove-lined rivers. The insects can even be found congregating up to 100m inland from the riverbank where they breed.

As Malaysia is at the centre of the firefly region that stretches from India to Papua New Guinea, we are fortunate to have a relatively high diversity of the insect. Of the over 20 species of fireflies, Malaysia hosts seven.

Of these, the most familiar would be the Pteroptyx tener, also known as the congregating or synchronous firefly. These fireflies typically congregate in groups along riverbanks and synchronise their flashes, thereby creating the light display that so many people gather to witness.

Places like Kuala Selangor have made firefly-watching a lucrative tourist attraction since the 1980s. What most people don’t know is that many other congregating firefly habitats in Malaysia are slowly being wiped out, both by ignorance and irresponsible development.

The preliminary findings of a six-month study of firefly habitats in peninsular Malaysia by the Malaysian Nature Society (funded by the Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund) paints a rather alarming picture.

While there are still many intact mangrove-lined rivers in Pahang, Terengganu, Perak and Johor that support congregating firefly populations, the localities in Selangor, Kedah, Kelantan, Perlis and Penang have been reduced to just one or two. In the states of Negeri Sembilan and Malacca, most of the fireflies’ habitats have been eliminated, due to the clearing and bunding of rivers.

According to MNS senior conservation officer Sonny Wong, the firefly habitats are primarily threatened by riverbank clearing, strong light sources along the rivers, and pollution of the river itself.

“Riverbank vegetation is often cleared and bunds erected to establish shrimp farms and oil palm plantations,” Wong explains. “Unregulated dumping of chemicals used in these activities often end up in the rivers. Besides that, light pollution along the rivers in the form of spotlights from aquaculture farms, fish farms, sand mining dredges, ports and factories creates additional negative impact, as fireflies are driven away by these strong lights. All these activities threaten the congregating fireflies’ life cycle and survival.”

The riverbanks of Sungai Sitiawan in Perak, which used to be the habitat of fireflies, have been disturbed by the presence of shrimp farms.

Even the healthy rivers that support congregating fireflies in the states mentioned above, however, are not completely safe – they face potential harm from flood mitigation measures that are being implemented by the Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID). This was seen after the floods at Kota Tinggi, Johor, in 2007, when the river was deepened to prevent future flooding.

While well-intended, such measures have already affected several congregating firefly rivers such as Sungai Linggi-Rembau, Sungai Sedili Kecil, Sungai Johor, and parts of Sungai Perak.

“The DID does have guidelines on how to clear rivers. The problem is that the jobs are given to contractors, who perhaps don’t follow these guidelines,” says Wong.

He further explains how the Linggi-Rembau river is one of the most affected ones, with its firefly watching area almost completely destroyed.

The problem is compounded by the fact that very little is known about the life cycle of the firefly itself. It spends the first three months of its life in the larvae stage, and less than a week as an adult, during which time, it will try to mate. For the synchronous fireflies, the mating occurs on the riverbank of mangrove-lined rivers. The mating, however, is a competitive process as the ratio of females is lower.

“The problem is that hardly anyone studies fireflies in this region,” says Wong, who has been surveying firefly populations in Malaysia for more than 10 years. “No one knows the complete life cycle; the Forest Research Institute Malaysia has studied it in the lab, but the details are still disjointed. Without this information, it isn’t easy to restore or restore the populations that have been lost.”

As always, it comes down to a matter of finances, and currently, more funding is needed to carry out these studies.

Wong hopes that the survey he is working on will initiate positive response from the Government.

“The idea behind the study is to find out how many rivers (in Malaysia) have congregating firefly populations. We estimate that there are about 70 sites, of which we have surveyed 20, and plan to do five more. Then, we will compile the information in a directory as future reference for research, education, awareness, and most importantly, for Government action,” says Wong.

MNS plans to approach DID and other relevant Government agencies with the survey’s results, to encourage them to re-examine their methods in executing flood mitigation projects and protect the remaining rivers that support congregating fireflies.

Wong plans to have a preliminary meeting with the various Government agencies later this month and nurses hopes of long-term solutions as well. Among these is the passing of a river reserve act that will prevent irresponsible clearing and polluting of rivers and riverbanks.

“The Government also needs to think again about how to mitigate floods, instead of simply clearing and bunding rivers. The Economic Planning Unit plays an important part too, as it should be convinced that floodplains like these areas should not be developed.”

He also hopes to develop more of the congregating firefly rivers into eco-tourism sites, specifically by getting the locals in the area involved.

“While there are currently about 14 firefly-watching sites in Malaysia (other than Kuala Selangor), the operators there are not locals, and they aren’t regulars. Therefore, they don’t practice ethical firefly-watching,” says Wong. For example, he explains how many of these operators shine bright lights into the riverbank trees to force the fireflies to come out, which then disrupts the insects’ mating and behaviour patterns.

“From a conservation point of view, it is better to use locals. We (MNS) will teach them the ethics of firefly-watching, and it will provide them with a means of livelihood. They can also feel a sense of ownership over the area, and be the “eyes” of the site, so to speak,” says Wong.


Read more!

Save the tiger: WWF Malaysia campaign

Tan Cheng Li, The Star 16 Feb 10;

The tiger may become the stuff of myths if we don’t act now to preserve the species.

DON’T just celebrate the Year of the Tiger. Act to save this iconic species, whose numbers have plunged in the wild. Tiger experts have warned that the big cat will be extinct across 13 range countries if nothing is done to stop its hunting, loss of habitat and deprivation of prey.

In Malaysia, only some 500 Malayan tigers are believed to roam our forests – down from 3,000 some 50 years ago. For the species to rebound to a sustainable level, tiger conservationists calculated that we have to double the existing tiger population in 10 years.

As part of efforts to boost tiger numbers, World Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF) is kicking off the Tx2 Campaign: Double or Nothing. This is a call to governments to put measures in place as part of a global effort to double the number of wild tigers in 13 range countries. There is an urgency as the global popu­lation of wild tigers is at an all-time low, but given the chance, support and opportunities, tiger numbers can recover.

The Tx2 campaign aims to initiate actions towards having 1,000 wild tigers in penin­sular Malaysia by 2020 through a two-pronged approach: raising public awareness on the tiger’s plight to garner more support for their conservation, and raising funds to increase tiger monitoring and protection efforts in and around the Belum-Temengor forest in Perak.

The WWF Wildlife Monitoring Unit con­­ducts field surveys to determine the conservation status and population trends of tigers and tiger prey in the forest. Ultimately, the group hopes to formulate tiger-friendly manage­­­­ment recommendations for incorporation into relevant forestry policies and management plans.

The WWF Wildlife Protection Unit (WPU) conducts patrols in the Royal Belum State Park and along the East-West Highway (also known as the Gerik-Jeli Highway) to keep poaching and other wildlife crimes at bay. Since the WPU’s establishment in December 2008, the unit has provided intelligence to the Department of Wildlife and National Parks, the police and the army. It has also helped remove 102 snares set by illegal hunters and aided the authorities in arresting 10 illegal hunters and traders.

Tigers are emblematic of environmental health. When wild tigers have the food and shelter they need to survive and thrive, the ecosystems they inhabit remain healthy, and provide numerous benefits to humans and other animals.

To launch the Tx2 campaign, various activities pertaining to tigers are now taking place at the Fo Guang Shan Dong Zen temple in Jenjarom, Selangor:

Exhibition and merchandise booths (Feb 14 to 21) – Visitors can learn more about tiger conservation efforts by WWF and partner orga­­ni­­­­­­­sations the Malaysian Conservation Allian­­­­ce for Tigers (MYCAT) and TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade and monitoring network. They can sym­­bolically adopt tigers to help protect them.

Making The Tiger Mark (Feb 16) – Make a tiger print plaster cast, a method used by wildlife biologists in the earlier days to count tigers in the forest, and bring it home with you.

Tx2 launch (Feb 20) – See 1,000 faces being painted with tiger stripes and colours, to symbolise the goal of achieving 1,000 tigers by the next Year of the Tiger in 2022.

Tiger Trail (Feb 21) – Just like in the Amazing Race, participants will race from one station to another to complete various tasks and get their “tiger report card” stamped. A souvenir awaits those who complete the race.

In April, WWF will start a search for a Tx2 Campaign ambassador, in which the public can vote for their favourite personalities to champion the cause.

For more information, go to wwf.org.my or e-mail tx2campaign@gmail.com

Major threat to big cats
The Star 16 Feb 10;

POACHING and illegal trade are the most urgent threats to tigers, having the greatest potential to cause colossal damage in a short time. With improved surveillance, detection of wildlife crimes has grown in recent years.

Tiger seizures in Malaysia

2008

* Nineteen dead tiger cubs and on another occasion, three dead tiger cubs from Saleng Zoo in Johor.

* Two live tigers in the home of a wanted robber in Sungai Petani, Kedah.

2009

* A snared tiger was rescued in Belum forest in Perak but it did not survive.

* A tiger skin from a man in Pahang.

* Five tiger skins from two Thais at the Bukit Kayu Hitam border crossing in Kedah.

* Three kgs of tiger bones along the East-West Highway.

Tiger seizures in Thailand

2008

* The Navy seized six tigers and five leopards being smuggled across the Thai-Lao border.

* Carcasses of two tigers and a leopard in a truck coming from Sungai Golok on the Malaysia-Thailand border.

2009

* Four tiger carcasses in the central Thai province of Prachuap Kiri Khan.

* Two tiger carcasses in the north-eastern Thai province of Nongkai.

* Of 12 meat samples tested from the seizures in Thailand, five were confirmed to be Malayan tigers.

Source: Malaysian Conservation Alliance for Tigers and Department of Wildlife and National Parks

Do your part
The Star 16 Feb 10;

YOU can ensure that there will still be tigers roaming our forests, and not just in tiny cages in zoos and theme parks, in the next Year of the Tiger in 2022, by:

* Reporting suspected crimes involving tigers and tiger prey to the Wildlife Crime Hotline at 019-356 4194.

* Learning about tigers and tiger prey and sharing this with friends and family.

* Not consuming traditional medicines containing parts of tigers and other endangered species.

* Not eating the meat of tigers, other endangered species and tiger prey (wild deer and wild boar).

* Boycotting wild meat restaurants.

* Supporti ng the protection of forests which are tiger habitats.

* Voicing your opinion on issues like indiscriminate development, illegal logging and poaching.

* Not supporting zoos or theme parks which display illegally acquired or endangered wildlife or which ill-treat wildlife.

* Paying more for wildlife-friendly products.

* Supporting conservation organisations.


Read more!

Plant-A-Tree area included in proposed land development project in Malaysia

Include trees in building plans, developer urged
The Star 16 Feb 10;

WILD Asia has recently heard that a new development project has started at the area near the Kota Damansara Community Forest (KDCF).

We are shocked to learn that the area proposed for development includes a small parcel of land that hundreds of people, including the residents and major media companies joined hands during our 2009 Plant-A-Tree event to plant seedlings on what was barren land.

The 2009 Plant-A-Tree event garnered extensive publicity and was broadcasted on TV, radio, and published in two dailies. The event was jointly organised by Wild Asia, AMP Radio Networks and Friends of Kota Damansara (FOKD), and attended by the Selangor state representative Sivarasa Rasiah.

The tree-planting was done in good faith with the support of the residents to help raise awareness of natural areas and the importance of the community forest.

Individuals and the corporate sector donated the tree saplings and hoped these would grow into mature trees that would extend the forest boundary or form a buffer zone between the forest proper and developed areas in Kota Damansara.

But more importantly, the event was a rare green moment when several hundred people were brought together to do something for the environment.

In the act of planting trees that will grow into a forest, we built a real connection to the environment. That indeed, was the value of the Plant-a-Tree event.

We do not deny the right of the developer to develop the area, but we hope that they will see the trees as an asset to their development rather than a liability.

We think it is worthwhile for the developers to see the wide interest in the area and work with people who have a stake in it.

Wild Asia urges the developer to incorporate those trees into their development plans. We believe that protecting the natural areas will not only be an asset to their development plans but help them establish connection to the community which will be a boost to the company’s corporate social responsibility.

We urge the developer to see this as an opportunity to “stand up for a tree” and create goodwill in the community by joining hands with residents and the community at large.

Dr Reza Azmi
Founder and executive director of
Wild Asia (Malaysia)


Read more!

Palm estate is forest, says Indonesian ministry

Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 16 Feb 10;

The Forestry Ministry is drafting a decree to include oil palm plantations in the forest sector to comply with international standards in mitigating climate change.

The ministry said it believed the policy would not lead to massive forest conversion into palm oil plantations as many critics feared.

“By definition, oil palm plantations will be defined as forest, but its management will be under the Agriculture Ministry,” head of research and development at the ministry, Tachrir Fathoni told The Jakarta Post on Monday.

He argued that many countries such as Malaysia, the world’s second biggest palm oil producer after Indonesia, had included oil palm plantations in its forest sector.

“By doing so, Malaysia can reap financial incentives from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of carbon trade,” he said.

He said that the UN only categorized trees with a certain height as forest trees, without identifying their species.

“It is to anticipate the implementation of the REDD scheme,” he said.

Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) allows forestry countries to receive financial benefits by stopping tree lopping.

Indonesia is home to the world’s third largest forest nation after Brazil and the Republic of Congo.

But the deforestation rate in Indonesia is the highest on the planet with more than 1 million hectares cleared per year due to illegal logging and massive forest conversion, including creating oil palm plantations.

Activists have said poor environmental management of oil palm plantations in Indonesia has led to the increase of greenhouse gas emissions.

But the Agriculture Ministry, managing the sector, insisted that the oil palm industry did not relate to deforestation.

It said that palm oil trees covered only 7 million hectares or 6 percent of the country’s total forest area.

Agriculture Minister Suswono earlier claimed that oil palm plantations utilized critical or marginal land into productive land.

The Agriculture Ministry issued a 2009 decree to allow oil palm plantations to be developed in Indonesia’s peat land.

The Greenomics Indonesia urged the Forestry Ministry to focus on its core business including managing industrial forest concessions (HTI) and forest concession holders.

“The ministry’s much-promoted sustainable forest management also remains in question. The Forestry Ministry should focus on its main core business,” Greenomics executive director Elfian Effendi told the Post.

He said that the Forestry Ministry should also resolve its different opinion of plantations to the Environment Ministry.

Greenpeace Indonesia media campaigner Hikmat Soeriatanuwijaya warned that the policy involving converting palm oil plantations into forest could lead to massive forest conversion.


Read more!

Indonesia May Open More Forests to Palm Oil

Arti Ekawati, Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

As Indonesia looks for ways to meet its ambitious emissions-reduction targets, the Ministry of Forestry on Monday said it plans to issue a new regulation that would allow commercial forestry companies to plant crops such as palm oil in new concession areas.

The ministry said the “mixed forest” regulation was intended to help companies survive the current low timber prices and would enable them to grow biofuel crops to help alleviate the country’s energy shortage.

Environmental groups warned that the plan would accelerate deforestation, which contributes to global warming.

Hadi Daryanto, director general of forest production at the ministry, said the regulation would be issued soon and would only apply to forestry concessions granted after it took effect.

Indonesia has 36.8 million hectares of commercial forests, with the government holding another 44.3 million hectares available.

The regulation would stipulate that at least 49 percent of forest concessions in question be used for planting commercial forests, while up to 21 percent could be planted in crops. The remaining 30 percent would be set aside for conservation and the use of local communities.

A similar regulation was issued in 1999 but was withdrawn after many forestry companies planted more of their land in palm oil than permitted.

Hadi said he was optimistic that companies would adhere to the rules this time because the ministry had a much more sophisticated monitoring system.

Elfian Effendi, the executive director of Greenomics Indonesia, said the group opposed resurrecting the failed policy.

“The ministry will repeat the failure, since forestry companies will prefer to plant palm oil because it’s more profitable than planting commercial forests,” Elfian said.

Even without such a regulation many forestry companies had illegally planted palm oil in commercial forest areas, he said.


Read more!

Indonesia's Foreign Ministry Fights Corruption Allegations

Nivell Rayda& Ismira Lutfia, Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa on Monday issued an all-out defense against accusations that a number of senior ministry officials, including the man he recently replaced, were allegedly involved in a corruption scam involving inflated travel expenses.

The country’s most prominent antigraft watchdog, Indonesia Corruption Watch, had reported to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) that former Foreign Minister Hassan Wirajuda and current ministry Secretary General Imron Cotan received Rp 1 billion and Rp 2.35 billion ($107,000 and $251,000), respectively, in the graft scheme. The Attorney General’s Office and the KPK are investigating the allegations.

Marty, although admitting to graft within the ministry, claimed that Wirajuda and Imron were named by low-ranking officials to cover their trail. “There are people who abused [high-ranking] ministry officials’ names,” Marty said.

“We have severely sanctioned those who were involved. We have also imposed new methods and taken steps to prevent similar scams from ever occurring again.”

Marty, however, declined to reveal how many ministry officials had been punished.

ICW deputy chairman Emerson Yuntho immediately blasted the ministry’s response, saying its decision to dismiss officials was meant to protect the higher-ups who were involved.

“The case has been handled as though it was merely a case of poor administration,” Emerson said. “This is purely criminal and violated the law on corruption because the state has been defrauded for years.”

Emerson also criticized the speed with which the minister had dismissed the possibility that senior officials might have been involved.

“There was never any internal inquiry against NHW,” he said, referring to Wirajuda by his initials. “How could the ministry come to the a conclusion that he was not involved?” he asked.

Neither Wirajuda nor Imron, a former ambassador to Australia, could be reached for comment on Monday night.

The ministry has launched an internal investigation into the scam, which cost the state an estimated Rp 30 billion per year.

Several ministry officials allegedly collaborated with seven travel agencies appointed by the ministry to inflate the total travel budget by as much as 80 percent.

The majority of the budget mark-up stemmed from diplomats assigned overseas. Foreign service employees have the option of buying their tickets first at approved travel agencies and then applying for reimbursement.

The travel agencies charged the diplomats the true price, but then billed the ministry far above the regular fare or made it appear that more expensive airlines or classes were used. In return, some of the illicit profit was kicked back to the diplomats. The ministry also discovered fictitious travel tickets.

Ministry officials were also accused of inflating the size of the claims the ministry made to the treasury. The ministry’s findings have been submitted to the AGO.

KPK spokesman Johan Budi said it would coordinate with the AGO to avoid any overlaps in their probes. “We will monitor the AGO’s progress.”


Read more!

NGOs seek to scrap Indonesian law on coastal management

Pandaya, Jakarta Post 16 Feb 10;

The 2007 Coastal and Islet Management Law is yet to be functional, but an alliance of activists are already seeking to shoot it down.

An alliance of NGOs have filed for a judicial review with the Constitutional Court to have the law revised or even scrapped as they claim it will see the state surrendering its sovereignty to capitalists.

The group says the law gives business entities the right to manage a particular area and share the profits with the local government, which will effectively rob indigenous po-pulations of their ancestral homes and livelihood.

“The law will only create legal certainty because in some ways the law is in conflict with the Constitution, which gives the right to control natural resources to the state to ensure the well being of the people,” said Taufiqul Mujib from the Indonesian Human Rights Committee for Social Justice.

The law the House of Representatives passed in 2007 is intended as an umbrella for the existing 20 or so lower regulations pertaining to the management of coastal and minor islands.

It also aims to help improve the livelihood of customary communities and islanders who have been living in the area for several generations.

Even though the law allows public participation in developing and managing the coast and islands, it requires bureaucratic procedures that only powerful capitalists can afford.

The concession holders are entrusted with a high degree of autonomy to manage and profit from the project. The activists agree that it is good that businesses are required to fulfill various obligations in relation to environmental protection, but argue that experience has shown that such contracts usually end up with bureaucrats bowing to the will of capitalists.

The government has given concessions to tourism businesspeople to develop and manage such places in Jakarta, Bali and a Tukangbesi Islands in Southeast Sulawesi.

Although the government is yet to make regulations and implement the law, activists warn that conflict between locals and businesspeople has already been brewing in many areas.

In Southeast Sulawesi, a simmering conflict has erupted between a pearl company and fishery communities who lost their fishing areas, which are now controlled by entrepreneurs.

Similar conflicts are also common along the coast between Surabaya and Banyuwangi in East Java, Taufiqul said.

In Togian Islands, Central Sulawesi, and Tukangbesi Islands, the economic welfare of fishermen has been on the decline after local administrations granted concessions to tourism operators, the NGOs noted.

In Tukangbesi, the indigenous popoulation has been barred from catching fish from coral reefs — something they have done all their life — after the tourism investor claimed the territory as theirs, said M. Riza Damanik, the secretary-general of Kiara (the People’s Coalition for Justice in Fishery).

“As compensation for the lost fishing area, the businessman set aside Rp 5 million a month for the locals and Rp 50 million for the local administration a year from its estimated Rp 5 billion in annual income,” Riza said.

In Ancol, a famed beach resort in North Jakarta, he said that no fisherman could even pass the area without putting up sails provided by the Ancol tourism management as a candid way of promoting the spot and the beach that is closed to the non-paying public.


Read more!

Indonesia ‘Working to Reopen’ Closed Mine

Jakarta Globe 15 Feb 10;

The government is trying to resolve a land-permit problem that has resulted in the closure of a coal mine in Kalimantan owned by Thai coal miner Banpu.

Last week, police temporarily closed the Jorong coal mine in South Kalimantan because it does not have a valid permit.

“We are holding talks at the Coordinating Ministry for the Economy on how to settle this issue,” Bambang Setiawan, director general of coal, minerals and geothermal at the Energy Ministry, said on Monday.

Bambang said the owners of the Jorong mine had already put in a request to the Forestry Ministry to extend its permit, but one had not yet been issued.

“Because of a need to continue production, the producer went on operating without the extension permit,” he added.

Banpu confirmed in a statement last Thursday that operations at the mine had been shut but said it would only have a slight impact on production at its Indonesian unit — PT Indo Tambangraya Mega.

“The stoppage was [caused] mainly by the overlapping of related regulations from different ministries,” Indo Tambangraya said last week.

Indo Tambangraya has six coal mining concessions in Indonesia, including Jorong.

Another official at the Energy Ministry said problems like this over land permits could hit mining output by increasing investor uncertainty regarding the industry in Indonesia.

“Indonesia needs more coal to supply coal-fired power plants, especially in Java from this year,” said the official, who declined to be identified.

“If there are many of these type of problems in the sector then it will cut coal production in future,” the official said.

The Jorong mine produces sub-bituminous coal, which is supplied to local power plants as well as being exported.

According to estimates from Indo Tambangraya, the Jorong mine produced 2.85 million tons of coal in 2009, with 2.3 million tons targeted at the overseas market.

The company said it did not know when it would be able to resume operations.

Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan said on Jan. 10 the ministry had revoked the land use permits for 23 mining and other firms operating in forested areas.

Zulkifli said at the time the ministry might crack down further as it took a tougher stance on environmental protection.

However, the government has also pledged to resolve bottlenecks and other bureaucratic obstacles that frequently hamper investment projects and have discouraged foreign investment in the country’s mining sector. Reuters


Read more!

Controversial dam Hatgyi in Myanmar will go ahead

Watcharapong Thongrung, Chularat Saengpassa, The Nation 16 Feb 10;

The Energy Ministry will proceed with the construction of the Hatgyi dam and hydropower plant in Burma, despite a local requirement to enhance the environmental impact assessment and information disclosure for greater transparency.

"There will be more studies. Although this may lead to a delay, the project is not scrapped," Energy Permanent Secretary Pornchai Rujiprapa said yesterday.

Most of the electricity from the 1.36 gigawatt plant will be supplied to Thailand.

Pornchai, as chairman of the subcommittee on power cooperation with neighbouring countries, said the Energy Ministry is ready to heed the advice of the committee led by PM's Office Minister Sathit Wongnongtoey. Sathit's committee said the environmental impact assessment be extended while information disclosure must be improved.

The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, as the representative of Thailand and the dam operator, will take care of the two issues.

The committee last month submitted the list of recommendations to Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, in a bid to make the investment project more transparent. The committee was set up following the National Human Rights Commission's complaints that the project would directly impact dozens of Karen villages and the villages may have to be relocated from the dam's floodplain.

Thousands more will suffer abuses from the Burmese army's attempts to secure the site, which have resulted in several military offensives and a large build-up of troops in the area.

All of the dams planned on the Salween River will greatly disrupt the riverine ecosystem and destroy the livelihoods of those peoples living along the river.

Sathit said in a telephone interview that the hold-up of the project should not cause diplomatic displeasure with Burma. He also referred to the cool response from Egat towards the proposals.

"The committee's concern was the repercussions on Burma, not the impacts on Egat's investment," he said. Next week, the committee will convene to monitor Egat's reactions to the suggestions. It will also work on the structure of the information disclosure unit, as well as its scope of responsibility.

Montree Chantawong, coordinator of Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (Terra), was pleased with the Sathit committee's resolutions, which should create a more transparent disclosure channel.

Egat has so far refrained from releasing the full EIA, claiming that it needed Burma's consent to submit the full report, he said. The civic groups received only a brief summary in English.

The civic groups actually want the government to terminate the investment outright, he said. While people in the Karen State would be saved, Egat does not need power from Burma. However, the construction will fuel fighting and suppression of the minority tribe.

He also urged the government to ask for parliamentary approval for the project's EIA, if it continues to support the project. Since the dam will lead to alterations in river flows, which could change Thai territory in Tak's Sob Moei district, the contract needs parliamentary approval under Article 190 of the Constitution, he said.

"The Human Rights Commission earlier even urged Egat to conduct a separate EIA on the Thai border, for a clearer impact," he said.

The Burma Rivers Network, comprising organisations representing various dam-affected communities in Burma, said on its website that "large development projects in Burma bring an expanded Burma army presence and the increased use of forced labour. Villagers living downstream from the dams will also face difficulties."

Energy Minister Wannarat Charnnukul insisted that Abhisit has not yet ordered a delay of Hatgyi Dam.

Pornchai stressed that Thailand has followed international human rights and environmental accords. The Energy Ministry has worked closely with the Foreign Ministry on the project. Once the negotiations are completed, the issue would be submitted to Parliament under the Constitution, he said.

Pornchai, as chairman of Egat, said Egat's board of directors recently approved the investment with Sinohydro from China.

A joint venture is being set up. Sinohydro will hold a bigger stake than Egat, as it is in charge of securing the loan, while the Burmese government will be a minority partner, he said.

The hydropower plant was expected to start commercial operations and export power to Thailand in 2015 or 2016. However, due to controversies, the project has been stalled and has not yet been included in the Power Development Plan.

On July 14, 1997, Thailand signed a framework agreement for 1.5GW from Burma by 2010. The first project was My-Kok Dam, with Italian-Thai Development and partners as the developer.

The lignite-fuelled dam, with 405MW capacity, is located in Shan State, 80 kilometres from Chiang Rai. It is scheduled to start feeding power to Thailand in January 2016. The power rate throughout the 25-year purchase contract averages Bt2.3 per unit, at the exchange rate of Bt34 to the US dollar.


Read more!

Whale shark found "without its fins and tail" in the Philippines

Whale shark dies along Batangas shores

Marrah Erika Lesaba, Inquirer Southern Luzon 16 Feb 10;

BATANGAS CITY – A Bantay Dagat (sea patrol) team buried Tuesday morning a whale shark, which was found without its fins and tail along the shores of the village of Maricaban in Tingloy Island here on Monday morning, said a team official of the Bantay-Dagat.

Rey Manalo, Bantay-Dagat head in Tingloy, 44 kilometers away from the city, said he received information about the whale shark at around 9:30 a.m. Monday.

A group of foreign and local divers from Mabini town found the whale shark along the shores of Maricaban.

“The whale shark was very weak when we left it at 5 p.m.,” he said.

Manalo believes the whale shark was accidentally trapped in a net of fishermen who were at the area at the time.

The whale shark could not have been removed from the net by the fishers’ bare hands so they needed to have its fins cut, said Manalo.

He added that the whale shark’s tail was gone.

Manalo said the group of fishermen might be from nearby places or from the island itself.

The whale shark was placed in waters with cool temperature with the Bantay-Dagat people watching but it died on Monday night, said Manalo.

Divers find whale shark with fins, tail sliced off
Marrah Erika Lesaba, Alcuin Papa Philippine Daily Inquirer 17 Feb 10;

BATANGAS CITY—A dead whale shark without fins and a tail was buried on the shores of Tingloy Island on Tuesday morning, inscribing a sad epilogue to a Manila conference of 50 nations for the protection of the endangered fish species.

Locally known as “butanding,” the juvenile whale shark (Rhincodon typus) was found at 9:30 a.m. on Monday by a group of foreign and local divers in Barangay Maricaban on the island, 44 kilometers from this city.

It was still alive but “very weak” when the group left it at 5 p.m., said Rey Manalo, head of the Bantay-Dagat (sea patrol) in Tingloy.

Manalo said the whale shark, measuring 18 feet, could have gotten accidentally entangled in a net laid out by a group of island fishermen who were catching fish nearby.

They must have tried to rescue the creature with their bare hands but could not do so without cutting its fins and tail, he said.

Since it could no longer swim, the hapless giant fish was placed in cool waters with Bantay-Dagat personnel watching over it, Manalo said. Unfortunately, it died on Monday night and was buried on the shore the next morning, he said.

SHARKS III

Last week, representatives of some 50 countries attended the third meeting of the International Cooperation on Migratory Sharks (SHARKS III) hosted by the Philippines in Manila. Eleven of them signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) pledging to protect the whale sharks.

The participants also agreed to advance the protection of seven shark species that needed protection—the Basking Shark, Great White Shark, Whale Shark, Spiny Dogfish Shark, Porbeagle Shark, and Shortfin and Longfin Mako Sharks.

SHARKS III falls under the Convention on Migratory Species and Wild Animals (CMS), otherwise known as the Bonn Convention.

“The memorandum of understanding on the butanding is a breakthrough since this is the first international cooperation that would ensure the protection and conservation of the sharks all over the world,” said Dr. Mundita Lim, chief of the Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau and conference chair.

The document was signed by the Philippines, China, United States, Costa Rica, Palau, Congo, Senegal, Republic of Guinea, Togo, Liberia, Kenya and Ghana. At least 10 signatories are needed to make it enforceable, Lim said

Conservation plan

Lim said the forging of the memorandum of understanding was important in crafting a conservation plan that included strengthening the policies of countries on shark conservation, possible funding for shark protection, and the enforcement of transboundary regulations to ensure the welfare of migratory sharks.

The plan will cover a ban on “shark finning,” or the practice of simply harvesting the fins of sharks with the still-alive marine creatures thrown back into the sea, she said.

Studies have identified “shark finning” as one of the reasons for the rapid decline in shark population worldwide. It is estimated that 100 to 200 million sharks are killed annually for their fins—the prime ingredients for the shark-fin soup delicacy.

Lim said that the international conservation plan would be finalized in the next meeting of member-signatories to the Bonn Convention.

No coordination

“The sharks can freely swim across waters of any country. That’s why this cooperation is very important to sustain efforts for their conservation. It is important for countries to come together toward the goal of ensuring the safety of the migratory sharks that may pass by their waters,” the official said.

In Batangas, Lea Villanueva, provincial chief of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, said the most common reasons for the death of whale sharks “are climate change and people who use illegal means to kill and earn from marine mammals.”

Villanueva said the City Environment and Natural Resources Office did not coordinate with her office about the latest butanding death.

She said she did not even see the fish before it was buried and that those who found it must have at least gathered basic information, such as length, size and width.


Read more!

Pollution creating acid oceans

The world's oceans are becoming acidic at a faster rate than at any time in the last 65 million years, threatening marine life and food supplies across the globe, according to a new study.
Louise Gray, The Telegraph 15 Feb 10;

Researchers from the University of Bristol looked at how levels of acid in the ocean have changed over history.

They found that as ocean acidification accelerated it caused mass extinctions at the bottom of the food chain that could threaten whole ecosystems in the future.

The rapid acidification today is being caused by the massive amount of carbon dioxide being pumped out by cars and factories every year, which is absorbed by the water. Since the industrial revolution acidity in the seas have increased by 30 per cent.

The last time such a fast change occurred is thought to be 65 million years ago, when some natural event caused ocean acidification and the dinosaurs died out.

The study looked at sediments from around 55 million years ago, when temperature rose by up to 6C and acidification was occurring at a similar rate as today.

It found widespread extinction of tiny organisms that live on the bottom of the ocean. Ocean acidification can dissolve the carbonate shells of marine organisms and cause muscle wastage and dwarfism in other species.

Andy Ridgwell, lead author of the paper published in Nature Geoscience, said it could mean problems for humans in the future.

"Unlike surface plankton dwelling in a variable habitat, organisms living deep down on the ocean floor are adapted to much more stable conditions. A rapid and severe geochemical change in their environment would make their survival precarious.

"The widespread extinction of these ocean floor organisms during the Paleocene-Eocene greenhouse warming and acidification event tells us that similar extinctions in the future are possible," he said.

Dr Ridgwell said acidification is actually occurring much faster today than in the examples they looked at from the past therefore "exceeding the rate plankton can adapt" and theatening the basis of much of marine life. This would mean fish and other creatures further up the food chain that human beings eat may be affected as soon as the end of this century.

"There is lots of concern about major disruption to ecosystems. Certainly coral reefs will be eroded, that has an impact on other species. We could see marine ecosystems affected this century," he said.

:: A separate study published in Geoscience found that the glaciers on Greenland are melting much faster than expected because of ocean currents bringing warm water into the area. If the warming continues it could cause sea levels to rise by 3ft, three times as much as previous estimates, by 2100.

Oceans' acidity rate is soaring, claims study
Steve Connor, The Independent 15 Feb 10;

The rate at which the oceans are becoming more acidic is greater today than at any time in tens of millions of years, according to a new study.

Rapidly rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere mean that the rate of ocean acidification is the fastest since the age of the dinosaurs, which became extinct 65m years ago, scientists believe.

The oceans are likely to become so acidic in coming centuries that they will become uninhabitable for vast swathes of life, especially the little-studied organisms on the deep-sea floor which are a vital link in the marine food chain.

Scientists have concluded, in a study published today in the journal Nature Genetics, that the current rate of ocean acidification is up to 10 times faster than 55m years ago – the last time the deep oceans became so acidic.

This is because of the speed at which carbon-dioxide concentrations are rising in the atmosphere. This carbon dioxide dissolves in seawater at the sea surface to form carbonic acid. The increased acidity of the water affects the amount of dissolved carbonate minerals that are available for marine organisms to use in forming their shells and hard skeletons.

When the oceans became acidified in a similar way about 55m years ago, it resulted in a mass extinction of deep-sea marine organisms, especially those living in the sediments of the sea floor, which can be studied geologically through changes to rock formations, said Dr Andy Ridgwell of the University of Bristol.

"Unlike surface plankton dwelling in a variable habitat, organisms living deep down on the ocean floor are adapted to much more stable conditions. A rapid and severe geochemical change in their environment would make their survival precarious," he said.

Studies also suggest that temperatures of the surface ocean rose, and carbon-dioxide levels increased over a period of a few thousand years.

The latest study compared these changes with predicted changes to ocean acidity resulting from continuing increases in concentrations of man-made carbon dioxide expected this century.


Read more!

Seeds of discontent: the 'miracle' crop that has failed to deliver

A new 'ethical' biofuel is damaging the impoverished people it was supposed to help
Cahal Milmo and Andrew Wasley, The Independent 15 Feb 10;

A "miracle" plant, once thought to be as the answer to producing renewable biofuels on a vast scale, is driving thousands of farmers in the developing world into food poverty, a damning report concludes today.

Five years ago jatropha was hailed by investors and scientists as a breakthrough in the battle to find a biofuel alternative to fossil fuels that would not further impoverish developing countries by diverting resources away from food production.

Jatropha was said to be resistant to drought and pests and able could grow on land that was unsuitable for food production. But researchers have found that it has increased poverty in countries including India and Tanzania.

Millions of the plants have been grown in anticipation of rich returns, only for growers to be hit by poor yields, conflict over land and a lack of infrastructure to process the oil-rich seeds.

Oil giant BP, which planned to spend almost £32m on a joint venture to set up jatropha plantations, has now pulled out and the charity ActionAid today warns that jatropha needs to be cultivated on prime food-growing land to produce significant yields.

According to one estimate, up to one million hectares of jatropha – an area equivalent to Devon and Cornwall combined – are being cultivated around the globe, despite little evidence that it can produce enough oil to make the crop commercially sustainable.

Meredith Alexander, head of trade at Actionaid and co-author of its "Meals per Gallon" report, said: "Jatropha is a real gold-rush crop, and the same amount of common sense that applies in a gold rush has been applied to the jatropha rush.

"Jatropha was the subject of an explosion of fabulous propaganda. But this was an untried crop at commercial levels and the many thousands of marginal farmers who have gone into production have been experimented on with disastrous results. They are simply not getting the income they were promised and now cannot afford food for their families," she said.

A native of central America, Jatropha curcus was brought to Europe in the 16th century and subsequently spread across Africa and Asia. Until recently, its few uses included a malaria treatment and an indigestion remedy.

But despite jatropha's much-lauded ability to grow where food crops cannot flourish, campaigners say there is evidence that commercially viable yields can only be obtained in fertile soil.

In India, forecasted annual yields of three to five tonnes of seeds per hectare have been scaled back to 1.8 to two tonnes. The Overseas Development Institute, a leading international development think-tank, has stated that "as the mainstay of people's livelihoods, jatropha looks distinctly marginal".

ActionAid said its researchers found repeated cases of farmers being left with jatropha crops they could not sell and land previously used to grow food crops being taken over by sub-contractors who then employed locals on wages that could not compete with rises in the price of foodstuffs partially caused by biofuel production.

Raju Sona, a farmer in north-east India who gave up land that usually produces vegetables to grow jatropha, said: "No one will buy jatropha. People said if you have a plantation then surely you have a good market. But we didn't see such a market. I threw the seeds away."

A number of British companies are continuing to market jatropha as a "highly ethical and green" investment. One fund offers investors three packages for prices ranging from £7,500 to £15,600 in a brochure entitled "Money really does grow on trees". That company says it has funded the planting of 32 million jatropha shrubs worldwide through a London-based provider called Carbon Credited Farming (CCF) Plc.

Jeff Reeves, head of global operations for CCF, which estimates it will have 300 million jatropha shrubs planted on 120,000 acres worldwide by the end of 2010, admitted that there had been problems establishing the crop.

He told The Ecologist magazine: "In many cases it is government policy and people that are to blame, rather than jatropha itself. Well-managed, jatropha ... can work. But there have been countries where poor management has meant this is not the case."

D1 Oils, a London-based biofuels company which has invested heavily in jatropha, said insisted it was too early to write off the crop as a long-term biofuel source. But its former co-investor, BP, disagreed. A spokesman said: "As other [renewable fuel] technologies came up, we looked again at whether jatropha was going to be the best biofuel source that could be scaled up. There were problems with it. We have decided to look elsewhere."

* Some of this research appeared in the Ecologist


Read more!

Cold snap killing Florida's coral reefs

Yahoo News 16 Feb 10;

MIAMI (AFP) – The polar snap enveloping much of the United States in record cold has been killing off coral reefs in the normally balmy warm waters off the Florida Keys, experts said Monday.

The unusually chilly weather so far this year has seen sea temperatures plummet in southern Florida -- a fatal development for the coral, which dies when exposed for an extended time to temperatures below 15 degrees Celsius (59 degrees Fahrenheit).

Especially in the lower Keys, "temperatures have been lower... there is higher mortality," Diego Lirman, a University of Miami expert on coral, told AFP.

Florida's usually mild and sunny winter weather has given way to record low temperatures during the historic cold snap in recent weeks.

In Miami, the thermometer in January and February regularly dropped below 35 degrees Fahrenheit (1.6 Celsius), the coldest temperatures since 1970.

The cold snap also has led to "bleaching," in which the coral loses pigmentation and ultimately dies.

Destruction of coral having a negative effect on delicate tropical eco-systems in the region, Lirman added, with micro-algae living within the coral forced to leave their habitat for lack of a food source.

Some of the worst affected species are the large brain and star coral, which can take several hundreds of years to grow into the vibrant underwater colonies.

"The Keys have not seen a cold-water bleaching event like this since the winter of 1977-78, when acres of staghorn coral perished," said Billy Causey, southeast regional director of NOAA's Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.

Florida's coral reefs are considered a unique natural heritage area in the United States for their proximity to the coast and their expansiveness, running from north of Miami in the Atlantic Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico.

The state's myriad of tropical animals also have been impacted by the cold snap so far this year, with iguanas dropping from trees and manatees huddling around waters warmed by power plants.

The cold-blooded iguanas' comfort level begins at 73 degrees Fahrenheit (23 Celsius) and they positively thrive at 95 degree Fahrenheit (35 degrees Celsius).

But when temperatures drop below about 60 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius), they become immobile, and below about 40 degrees Fahrenheit (five degrees Celsius), they become completely immobile due to a lack of blood flow.

Unable to hold on, the helpless mohawked lizards that shelter in tree branches have been seen falling to the ground, and wildlife officials have offered guidelines to revive them.

Cold weather kills off Florida wildlife
Iguanas, pythons and other non-native species are freezing to death as temperatures plummet in the Sunshine State
Suzanne Goldenberg, guardian.co.uk 15 Feb 10;

Comatose iguanas have been dropping from the trees and pythons have frozen to death in their tracks in Florida's unusually harsh winter, wildlife officials said today.

Parts of the Sunshine State saw their second snowfall of the season this weekend, with the extended cold spells killing off a host of tropical intruders, including iguanas, Burmese and African pythons and invasive fish.

State wildlife officials said more than half of the green iguanas, which are native to South America, could have been killed off. "The iguanas up in the trees just got so cold, they kind of went very, very sluggish, and just fell down," said Jenny Tinnell, a biologist with Florida's Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

Residents of south Florida, who have discovered the animals on their patios, have tried to warm them back to life.

Local newspapers, meanwhile, have been warning homeowners not to let their dogs gnaw on iguana corpses, which may be poisonous.

In the Everglades, trackers licensed by the state have discovered the decaying corpses of three African rock pythons, which can reach over 20ft and can kill people. State officials believe up to half of the Burmese pythons have also died, along with large numbers of invasive fish.

The python die-off could be helpful to wildlife officials. The alien constrictors, many of them abandoned pets, have been taking over portions of the Everglades, threatening native species.

Last month, the Obama administration said it was considering a ban on nine species of giant snake.

"The fish and wildlife commission has no problem with nature naturally knocking back those populations," said Tinnell.

But the harsh winter is also harming natives such as the manatee, which is an endangered species. Long periods of cold weaken their immune systems. Officials said about 200 manatee carcasses have washed up on shore since the beginning of the year. Dozens of crocodiles have also died.

The extreme temperatures also prompted a rescue effort last month for endangered sea turtles. Officials plucked more than 4,000 from chilly waters, bathing them in warm salt water to revive them.


Read more!

Decrease in fog threatens California's sequoias: study

Yahoo News 16 Feb 10;

WASHINGTON (AFP) – California's coastal fog has decreased significantly over the past 100 years, potentially endangering coast redwood trees dependent on cool, humid summers, according to a new study made public Monday.

The study by University of California, Berkeley, scientists said it was unclear whether this phenomenon was part of a natural cycle or the result of human activity.

But it warned the change could affect not only the redwoods, but the entire redwood ecosystem.

"Since 1901, the average number of hours of fog along the coast in summer has dropped from 56 percent to 42 percent, which is a loss of about three hours per day," said study leader James Johnstone, who worked at the University of California's Department of Geography before becoming a post-doctoral scholar in the campus's Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management.

"A cool coast and warm interior is one of the defining characteristics of California's coastal climate, but the temperature difference between the coast and interior has declined substantially in the last century, in step with the decline in summer fog," Johnstone continued.

The loss of fog and increased temperature mean that "coast redwood and other ecosystems along the US West Coast may be increasingly drought-stressed, with a summer climate of reduced fog frequency and greater evaporative demand," said co-author Todd Dawson, a Berkeley professor of integrative biology.

"Fog prevents water loss from redwoods in summer, and is really important for both the tree and the forest. If the fog is gone, we might not have the redwood forests we do now."

The report will be published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Less Fog in California Could Stress Redwoods
Andrea Thompson, livescience.com Yahoo News 16 Feb 10;

Significantly less fog is drifting in along the Pacific Coast these days, a new study finds. The shift force a decline in redwood trees, which rely on the fog to keep them supplied with water during the arid summer months.

Climate models have predicted that with the warming caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere, California's coastal fog would increase as a result of changing atmosphere and ocean circulation patterns.

But weather records that just recently became available have shown the opposite trend of a significant decrease in fog over the past 100 years.

"Since 1901, the average number of hours of fog along the coast in summer has dropped from 56 percent to 42 percent, which is a loss of about three hours per day," said study leader James A. Johnstone, who conducted the research while working on his Ph.D. at the University of California, Berkeley, and is now at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Warmer, too

And the decline in fog isn't the only change to affect the coastal area where redwoods reside.

"A cool coast and warm interior is one of the defining characteristics of California's coastal climate, but the temperature difference between the coast and interior has declined substantially in the last century, in step with the decline in summer fog," Johnstone said.

Both of these changes could impact the health of the iconic coast redwood (Sequoia semperviren), one of the tallest and longest-lived tree species in the world, with some individual trees passing the 2,000-year mark.

Elsewhere, global warming is causing some trees to grow faster. But a warmer world is bad news for redwood trees.

Redwoods aren't very good at regulating their water use. At night, they leave open their stomata - the pores on leaves that plants use to exchange gases such as water vapor and carbon dioxide with the air - which allows water to leave, but doesn't give them any of the benefits of photosynthesis, since there is no light shining on them.

Fog helps the redwoods conserve water, because it increases the humidity of the air around the trees, so less water escapes from their leaves.

A decrease in fog cover and an increase in coastal temperature could combine to make the trees lose more water and become drought-stressed.

"Fog prevents water loss from redwoods in summer, and is really important for both the tree and the forest," said Todd Dawson, also of UC Berkeley, who co-authored the study that describes the fog changes. "If the fog is gone, we might not have the redwood forests we do now."

Broader impacts

And any change in the redwood forests, could have broader impacts on the regional ecosystem.

"As fog decreases, the mature redwoods along the coast are not likely to die outright, but there may be less recruitment of new trees; they will look elsewhere for water, high humidity and cooler temperatures," Dawson said. "What does that mean for the current redwood range and that of the plants and animals with them?"

The study, detailed this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first to show that fog is not as ephemeral a phenomenon as it may seem and that it in fact is a systematic process connected to the larger Pacific Coast climate, Johnstone told LiveScience.

The work was supported by the Save the Redwoods League and the Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center.


Read more!

Bangladesh PM seeks early climate fund disbursement

Nizam Ahmed, Reuters 15 Feb 10;

DHAKA (Reuters) - Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Monday urged donors countries to come up quickly with promised funds to help her country limit the effects of climate change.

World leaders pledged an initial $10 billion fund at the December climate summit in Copenhagen to help least developed countries (LDCs) most vulnerable to climate change, particularly low-lying costal states like Bangladesh.

"Bangladesh needs quick disbursement of the fund promised in Copenhagen ... as we have already started mitigation programs," she told a donors' conference.

"We have built 100 new cyclone shelters and more are on the way, under 134 climate change action plans."

Opening the two-day meeting called Bangladesh Development Forum, she urged participants to increase the pledged climate fund. Bangladesh, she said, had earmarked a $100 million Climate Change Fund in its 2009-10 (July-June) fiscal budget in addition to a $150 million fund raised with assistance from donors.

The environment ministry has said Bangladesh is entitled to ask for at least 15 percent of the climate adaptation fund pledged at the Copenhagen summit.

Climate experts say at least 20 million of Bangladesh's more than 150 million people will be displaced, and one-fifth of the country's 140,800 sq. km (55,000 sqm) land surface will be inundated if sea levels rise by one meter by 2050.

Donors in attendance included the United States, European Union, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. The meeting is to review Bangladesh's development programs, including plans to reduce poverty and help donors select areas of cooperation.

Disaster management officials said Bangladesh has more than 2,500 shelters for some 2.5 million people. But these are insufficient for more than 20 million coastline residents.

The meeting is the first of its kind since Hasina returned to power following a December 2008 parliamentary election that ended a two-year period of rule by an army-backed interim government.

Bangladesh annually receives some $1.5 billion in assistance from donors.

(Editing by Anis Ahmed and Ron Popeski)


Read more!

UN Panel Approves 32 China Wind Farms, Blocks Six

Nina Chestney and Michael Szabo, PlanetArk 16 Feb 10;

LONDON - A United Nations climate panel approved 32 Chinese wind farms for carbon financing under the Kyoto Protocol late last week, but blocked another six after rejecting eight similar projects in December.

The approved wind farms will cut greenhouse gas emissions by some 11.3 million metric tones by the end of 2012, the year the current Kyoto pact expires, according to UN data.

Under Kyoto's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), companies can invest in clean energy projects in emerging economies, and in return receive offset credits, only if they can show the projects would not have gone ahead without the prospect of revenues from selling those credits.

After noting a drop in financial support from Beijing in the form of tariffs, the CDM's executive board rejected 10 wind farms in December, saying they were profitable and capable of cutting emissions without receiving the offsets, called Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs).

The board on Friday said two of those were rejected by mistake, bringing the total rejected in December to eight.

At its latest meeting, the board fully registered 13 Chinese wind farms while conditionally approving another 19 subject to minor corrections in their applications.

The latest six rejected Chinese wind farms, five of which were in the province of Heilongjiang, would have generated 2.1 million metric tones of CERs by 2012. The panel also rejected six other clean energy projects, four of which were in China.

According to UN data, the 12 rejected projects would have generated around 3.8 million CERs before 2012, worth 44 million euros ($59.91 million) based on Friday's closing spot CER price of 11.58 euros a tonne.

The projects' investors included U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs, Japanese government agency NEDO, Dutch firm Essent Energy Trading and UK-based Climate Change Capital.

Companies participating in the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme rely on a steady flow of offsets to help them meet emissions cut targets, and disruptions to the CER supply can cause carbon prices to rise.

The board also fully registered 17 hydro projects including 15 from China, which will generate 8.2 million CERs by 2012.

Experts had said the projects faced similar registration risks to those plaguing the Chinese wind projects.

DEFERS REGISTRATION FEES

In an effort to extend the reach of the CDM, the board agreed to defer registration fees for projects in countries that are home to less than 10 registered projects. Registration fees are due only after the projects have been issued their first CERs, the board said.

Of the 80 developing countries participating in the CDM, 53 nations, or two thirds, fall into this category, UN data showed.

The CDM's board also said it is waiving registration fees for projects in the world's least developed countries (LDCs).

The UN made $56.6 million in CDM revenues in 2009 including $17.1 million in registration fees, the board said in its meeting report.

At its last meeting in December, the board said it would conduct spot checks on emissions auditors TUV-Sud and TUV-Nord.

On Friday it said it would review the outcome of these spot checks at its next meeting in Bonn, Germany on March 22-26.

(Editing by Michael Urquhart)


Read more!