Best of our wild blogs: 24 Apr 13


Random Gallery - Hieroglyphic Flat
from Butterflies of Singapore

Slides for Collaborative Consumption in Singapore
from Green Future Solutions

Why do some soft corals pulsate? We know now!
from wild shores of singapore

Malaysia may be home to more Asian tapirs than previously thought (photos) from Mongabay.com news by Jeremy Hance

RSPO failing to meet sustainability objectives for palm oil production, says WWF from Mongabay.com news by Rhett Butler


Read more!

From garden city to urban farmland

In land scarce Singapore, a new crop of farmers and gardeners are proving that we are not too small to grow our own food
Annette Tan Today Online 20 Apr 13;

Singapore — It’s not often in Singapore that one can boast about sharing a meal with the farmer who grew the vegetables that are on your plate. Yet there we were, breaking bread with Singapore’s new crop of urban farmers, all bent on proving that it is possible to grow and eat our own produce in this concrete jungle.

On our plates were a mix of locally- grown abalone and willow mushrooms tossed with red spinach gleaned from the very first harvest by Comcrop, an urban farming initiative whose pilot plot is a 400 square foot aquaponics test farm in the National Youth Council Academy Greens.

Having successfully grown this maiden crop of edible vegetables, Comcrop will soon move into a 6,000 square foot commercial farm in the heart of Orchard Road, on the rooftop of *SCAPE. Here, the plan is to grow up to 15,000 fresh vegetables each month, which will be sold to restaurants across the island. So much then, for the old excuse that there isn’t enough land in Singapore to grow our own food.

“We need to build our food resilience as a country. We shouldn’t have to be so dependent on importing our food supplies,” said Allan Lim, co-founder of The Living Project, the social enterprise that sponsors Comcrop.

Land redevelopment schemes

To that end, the heart of Comcrop’s approach is to use what it calls “marginalised land”. “Places and things that people don’t see as useful and turn them into commodities rather than waste,” said Jeremy Chua, who oversees Comcrop’s agricultural technologies.

Run entirely by volunteers such as Chua, Comcrop is hoping to extend its green spaces to other such areas. It is studying the viability of farming atop JTC food factory buildings to supply the food companies housed within them. Around 20 per cent of all profits will go to other social causes that have yet to be determined.

“What we will yield is fresh pesticide- and chemical-free vegetables that are delivered on the same day that they are harvested,” said Lim. “Consumers get greens that are fresher and with better flavour at the same prices that they are already paying now.”

One of the restaurants that Comcrop will supply when it generates its first commercial harvest is Artichoke at Sculpture Square. The restaurant’s chef-owner Bjorn Shen is a pioneer in the local farm-to-table movement. Over the years, he has worked closely with local farmers and producers to source for ingredients such as eggs, fish, quail and wheatgrass to use in his menu of rustic Moorish-style dishes.

“We would like to believe that it is a valuable experience for our customers to know where their food comes from,” explained Shen. “Most of the time, food tastes better when it didn’t have to endure the long journey across the seas in a container. And local produce is of the same quality as imported products, which is more expensive.

“As restaurateurs, using local produce makes us feel better about ourselves and gives us joy. We also hope that the locavore movement will make Singapore culture just a little more sophisticated — one small step at a time.”

Fresh veggies at your door

Farm-fresh produce isn’t just the domain of restaurants. Local farms such as Quan Fa Organic Farm purvey organically grown produce that it delivers to homes across the island. Started in 1999 by Liao Quan Fa, 62, the farm in the Lim Chu Kang area cultivates a vast range of vegetables such as kai lan, sweet potato leaves, watercress and various species of lettuce, as well as eggplant, gourds, beans and herbs. It also imports organic produce such as potatoes, corn, cauliflower and beets daily from neighbouring countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia.

The farms harvest their crops in the mornings, pack and send them out in refrigerated delivery trucks by noon.

“The food reaches our customers that same day,” emphasised Junjie, Liao’s 25-year-old son, who handles the farm’s business development.

The prices of organically grown produce are a little higher compared to their conventionally grown cousins. To wit: A 250-gram packet of Quan Fa’s kai lan retails at S$2.50 compared to S$1.20 for the same conventionally grown vegetable in the wet market. A kilogram of organically grown eggplant sells for S$10 compared to the S$6.90 it costs for regular eggplants sold through a local supermarket’s website.

Still, it is a premium that many health-conscious Singaporeans, such as 40-year-old homemaker Jennifer Chen, are willing to pay for the produce.

“The freshness and convenience of having the produce delivered to my door on the same day it is harvested is definitely a draw,” said the mother of two toddlers. “And the prices are not so high that they are unaffordable. I don’t mind paying that little bit more because it means that my family eats fresh fruit and vegetables that are not genetically modified or treated with chemicals.”

Accountant Lisa Tan, 38, who has been buying and eating organic products for the last 10 years points out that the price of local, organically grown produce is still significantly cheaper than imported organic fare.

“I used to pay S$7 for 300 grams of organic kai lan from Thailand. With the option of local farms, I now pay half that price,” she said.

Kin Yan Agrotech is another local farm along Neo Tiew Crescent that grows and delivers wheatgrass, mushrooms, roselle fruit, edible cacti and aloe vera products. Like Quan Fa, most of Kin Yan’s organically grown vegetables are harvested, packed and shipped on the same day. They cost a bit more than their regularly grown counterparts.

“It costs a bit more because organically grown produce takes a longer time to grow,” explained Liao. “We don’t use chemicals to speed up the growth process as non-organic farms tend to do. That’s why production levels at farms like ours are about 30 to 40 per cent lower than conventional farms.”

Staying clear of chemicals also means that the crops are at the weather’s mercy. “If there is too much rain, you get root rot, which means the vegetables cannot absorb the soil’s nutrients properly,” he added. “If the weather is too hot, then the plants suffer too. The best conditions for our vegetables is when it is hot and windy.”

There are plenty of other such farms in the Kranji Countryside, though they don’t deliver their produce door-to-door as Quan Fa and Kin Yan do. More than anything, they serve as a testament to Singapore’s encouraging evolution towards its growing food resilience.

Grow it yourself

Outside of these farms, the “grow your own food” movement is a burgeoning one championed by social enterprises like the year-old Edible Gardens. The group is made up of several passionate individuals who believe that every urbanite can grow their own fruit and vegetables.

Edible Gardens’ pilot community garden at the Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hall is already a hit, drawing Singaporeans of all ages and walks of life who come to plant and nurture vegetables that anyone and everyone enjoy. The group’s co-founder Bjorn Low, said that the plot, though small, is meant to serve as an educational space.

“It is where we can impart our skills to the people who come here so that they can grow their own urban gardens at home, and in turn, pass on their knowledge to friends and family,” said the agricultural consultant.

Living up to its name, the group has also helped set up edible gardens for restaurants including Artichoke, which now has its own supply of herbs that range from more common varieties of mint, thyme and basil, to more unusual ones like borage and stevia. The gardens are often set in carefully stacked wooden crates that eliminate the need to plant directly in the ground.

“We no longer need to buy mint and thyme,” said Shen. “We are self-sufficient on those fronts. But more than that, the edible garden is really a symbol of where our products come from and what can be done with limited spaces when it comes to growing food.”

Another proponent of urban farming is 32-year-old Catherine Cheng, who founded Small Space Sprouts, selling pre-planted containers or D-I-Y kits that contain plants, organic potting soil and everything needed to grow edible herbs and vegetables in a small, urban space.

“All too often, we buy a package of herbs from the supermarket and then use only a little. The rest gets thrown away,” she said. “These are things that we can easily grow ourselves and I want to show people that you can be part of the cycle of growing something even if you live in a small urban space.”

Who knows? It may only be a matter of time before Singapore transforms itself from a garden city into a farming one.

BOX

HYDROPHONICS 101

While local farms have upped the ante, some of them have opted to grow produce using hydroponics — or growing vegetables without soil. But just how successful has it been? We roped in Neo Ai Ling, project manager of Oh Chin Huat Hydroponic Farms, one of Singapore’s pioneering hydroponics farms, to give us the low-down.

What is hydroponics farming?

Ai Ling: Unlike organic farming, crops are grown without the use of soil and in a controlled environment. Hydroponics farming uses only water and mineral nutrient solutions.

What is the difference between hydroponics and organic farming?

Besides the lack of soil, hydroponics farming uses salt-based fertilisers (think nitrogen, phosphorus etc mixed for optimal growth) while organic farming uses fertilisers made of organic botanical remains. The nutrients availability in organic farming depends on the source, environment and the microbial population. In hydroponics, the amount of nutrients are controlled and provided directly to the plants.

What are some advantages of hydroponics vegetables?

Cleaner and more hygienic in the way crops were grown: The absence of soil rids the risks of weeds and soil-borne diseases. Our crops are different because it’s 100 per cent free of pesticide. However, there are some hydroponics farms that still use pesticides when growing their crops because it depends on the technique that was applied and the kind of crop that is growing.

Why the trend towards hydroponics?

Hydroponics is especially relevant in Singapore because we are short of land. For most Singaporeans, hydroponics is a soilless method that is clean and easy to manage. As compared to plants that are grown in soil, hydroponics gardening uses only water and don’t require any fertilisers. This is useful for Singaporeans when they travel as the plant doesn’t need to be tended to.

Is there a significant difference in nutritional value?

Comparatively speaking, most methods of growth produce about the same nutritional values.

Are hydroponics vegetables cheaper than those that are imported?

Not necessarily. Beyond the high set-up and running costs, hydroponics vegetables might be even more expensive depending on the weather. However, we are very constant with the prices available in the market.


Read more!

Hourly updates of haze situation now available on NEA website

Woo Sian Boon Today Online 24 Apr 13;

SINGAPORE — Hourly updates of the haze situation here are now being made available by the National Environment Agency (NEA) — more than a month ahead of the traditional dry season when the region’s burning activities are more pronounced. The service, which began yesterday, comes after forest fires in Sumatra over the past few days.

Air quality remained good yesterday, as the three-hourly Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) readings between 7am and 7pm fluctuated between 40 and 46, reaching the peak at 2pm. As at 7pm, the reading was 44. Readings below 50 are classified as “good”, higher than 50 is “moderate” while anything above 100 is “unhealthy”. The level of PM2.5, or very fine particulate matter, was between 24 to 28 micrograms per cubic metre, yesterday.

Although air quality has mostly remained good since the beginning of this year, the smoggy conditions and burning smell experienced across the island last Friday led to many concerns that the haze was back.

According to the NEA yesterday, Singapore is “unlikely to be affected by significant trans-boundary haze” as the increase in rainfall over the last few days which has “helped to suppress hotspot activities” is expected to continue “for the next few days”. However, it added that “brief slight haziness” is possible, especially during the mornings. “This is due to the accumulation of particulate matter and/or mist as the low-level winds are forecast to be light and variable,” said the agency.

The NEA also said that while the region’s burning activities occur throughout the year, these will be more pronounced during the traditional dry season, which typically lasts between June and October.

While the severity and duration of the dry season varies from year to year, it is characterised by prevailing winds that generally blow from the south-east and south-west.

“During periods of dry weather conditions, increased burning activities tend to occur in the region and the smoke haze from these fires can be carried over to Singapore by prevailing winds,” said the NEA.

It added that the impact of the haze is dependent on factors such as the proximity and extent of the fires, the strength and direction of the prevailing winds, and the incidence and amount of rainfall.

Given the recent forest fires in Sumatra, and in order to provide the public with timely information about the haze, the NEA has decided that it would make available three-hour PSI readings on its website and smart phone application starting yesterday.

The three-hour PSI readings will be updated from 7am to 7pm daily.


Read more!

U.N. urges crackdown on Asia-fuelled poaching boom

Derek Brooks PlanetArk 24 Apr 13;

Growing Asian demand for ivory and rhino horn as gifts and hangover cures - not for traditional medicine - is fuelling a poaching boom, international officials said on Tuesday, demanding stiffer penalties for traffickers.

Wildlife crime and illegal forestry has become the fourth- largest cross-border type of crime in the world behind the illicit trade in drugs, arms and human beings, a United Nations conference in Vienna heard.

The World Wildlife Fund estimates the category is worth $17 billion a year and includes the poaching of rhinoceros and elephants for their horns and tusks, hunting of large cat species for fur, and illegal harvesting of trees.

The UNODC, however, estimates a much larger value, with the trade in the Asia and the Pacific region alone having a total value of some $19.5 billion for the illegal trade in wildlife and wood-based products.

South Africa, home to the largest population of rhinos, is on pace to lose 812 of the animals this year. Poachers sell the horn to crime syndicates to feed swelling demand in Asia, where the horn is thought to cure cancer and have other health benefits.

Horns are sold to the newly affluent at pharmacies in places like Hanoi at prices higher than gold.

John Scanlon, director-general of the Geneva-based Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), told the conference that growing demand for ivory and rhino horn had triggered a startling increase in poaching.?

"China and Southeast Asia are the biggest destinations of these illegal products, but not because of the traditional medical uses. Growing uses in Asia include the giving of ivory as a high-value gift, drinking of rhino horn wine, and rhino horn as an aphrodisiac, a cure for cancer, and hangovers."

"Traditional Chinese medical practitioners have actually discouraged its use for conservatory reasons," he said.

Yury Fedotov, head of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, called on member states to increase penalties for illegal traders.

While he acknowledged the need of increased enforcement on the part of exporting countries, Fedotov noted that it is the responsibility of states to punish those who import illicit materials as is done in the case of the narcotics trade.

"Wildlife and forest crimes must be treated as serious crimes with minimum punishments of four years or more so that full force of deterrence can be used against criminals," he said. "The harder task, however, will be to curb the demand."

(Editing by Jon Hemming)


Read more!