Best of our wild blogs: 26 Jan 09


Wonder
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Streaked Spiderhunter catching a spider
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Birds and Dillenia suffruticosa
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Birds of Kallang River
on the wonderful creation blog

Are there seagrasses at Kranji Nature Trail?
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Happy Lunar New Year!
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Solar eclipse today!
on the wild shores of singapore blog

How dolphins prepare the perfect cuttlefish meal
on the Not Exactly Rocket Science blog


Read more!

Nets leave their mark

Thomas Chamberlin, The Cairns Post 26 Jan 09;

THOUSANDS of Far Northern sea creatures like this endangered olive ridley turtle are lucky to be alive after being tortured by overseas fishermen.

James Cook University researcher Jennie Gilbert said dolphins, dugongs, whales, fish and turtles were just some of the creatures found washed up on beaches with telltale "burn marks".

The animals can be dragged for kilometres out at sea after being tangled up in discarded fishing nets from Indonesian, Japanese and Korean boat crews.

"These nets are indiscriminate killers," Ms Gilbert said.

Napranum land and sea rangers rescued this endangered 35kg breeding-age turtle when it washed up on to the beach after Cyclone Charlotte about two weeks ago.

With cuts to the bone, the turtle was flown by Qantaslink to Cairns late on Friday for surgery, amid fears it may need a flipper amputated.

After successful surgery, which saved all its flippers, the turtle is now under observation at the Cairns Turtle Rehabilitation Centre.

Ms Gilbert said dozens of rescues were made each year because the discarded fishing nets, carried by strong currents and cyclones, "became a giant scoop" and picked up hundreds of animals as they approached Australia.

The researcher, who in conjunction with Carpentaria Ghost Nets is writing a thesis on the implications of ghost netting, said one net recently found at Bamaga weighed six tonnes and was 6km long.

"They just drift through the water and kill everything on the way through," Ms Gilbert said.

"We really need to look at what we can do to stop these nets from coming down and I think at the moment we need to show how many animals are injured and killed.

"If you actually go up to the Gulf and walk on the beaches, there are kilometres and kilometres of ghost nets. A lot of them you just find the dead bones in them."

Ms Gilbert said researchers could pinpoint the country and the boat using the nets, but said the fishermen or countries were never prosecuted by the Federal Government.

"Not many people do know about it - we need people to start to jump up and down to say this is ridiculous," she said.

Ms Gilbert hopes her research will eventually lead to prosecutions for ghost-netters.

The Carpentaria Ghost Net program has removed more than 5500 nets in the past three years, with 90 per cent of the 200 types of nets being foreign.

Since 1996, the program has recorded 205 stranded turtles on Cape Arnhem alone.


Read more!

Loggerhead Sea Turtle Deaths Prompt Lawsuit Threat

Environment News Service 23 Jan 09;

GAINESVILLE, Florida, January 23, 2009 (ENS) - A coalition of conservation groups has notified the National Marine Fisheries Service of its intent to file a lawsuit as early as March if the agency does not act immediately to protect imperiled sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico.

The action comes after fisheries observer data showed that the Gulf of Mexico bottom longline fishery, which harvests reef fish like grouper and tilefish, resulted in the capture of nearly 1,000 threatened and endangered sea turtles between July 2006 and the end of 2007.

The coalition urges that the commercial bottom longline fishery be suspended until the federal agency meets its legal obligations under the Endangered Species Act to ensure that the fishery does not imperil sea turtles and other threatened species in the Gulf of Mexico.

All six species of sea turtles occurring in the United States are protected under the Endangered Species Act.

Even though the fishery has far exceeded the number of turtles it is allowed to take under the Endangered Species Act, the Fisheries Service, has declined to close the fishery while it studies options for reducing turtle take, a decision the conservation groups claim is illegal.

"Allowing this fishery to continue to kill threatened and endangered turtles while the government studies the problem is irresponsible and illegal," said Andrea Treece, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity.

"Now that the National Marine Fisheries Service knows the longline fleet is jeopardizing the future of the turtle populations they have a duty to act immediately," said Cynthia Sarthou, executive director of the Gulf Restoration Network.

Loggerhead sea turtles are of greatest concern to the groups because this species accounted for 799 of the 974 captured turtles in the government analysis. This is more than three times the number of loggerheads the Service authorized the fishery to take in 2005.

Loggerhead nesting populations in Florida have dropped by 41 percent over the past 10 years. The groups say the large number of juvenile and reproductive adult turtles injured or killed by the bottom longline fishery is likely contributing to this steep decline.

"It's devastating to think about all the hard work and progress we've made safeguarding Florida's loggerheads and their nesting beaches being destroyed by this rampant level of take," said David Godfrey, executive director of the Caribbean Conservation Corporation based in Gainsville. "We must stop and reassess the impacts of this fishery before it's too late."

The Gulf of Mexico bottom longline fishery operates primarily off the west coast of Florida, an area that provides key habitat for several sea turtle species, including loggerhead, Kemp's ridley, and green turtles.

Bottom longliners lay a mainline up to 10 miles long with as many as 2,100 baited hooks. Sea turtles are caught when they attempt to eat the bait or become entangled when swimming near a line.

"The use of longlining in the Gulf of Mexico is tragic. Loggerheads, Kemp's ridleys and other sea turtles die caught by a fishing method that has no regard for the waste it entails and the death of endangered species," said Carole Allen, Gulf office director of the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "It reminds many of us of the slaughter of sea turtles drowning in shrimp trawls before Turtle Excluder Devices were required."

A Turtle Excluder Device is a grid of bars fitted into a trawl net. Shrimp pass through the bars and are caught in the bag end of the trawl. When larger animals, such as sea turtles are caught in the trawl they strike the bars and are ejected through the opening.

"There are other ways to catch the same fish without killing turtles," said Sarthou. "The Service needs to follow the precedent set by Gulf shrimpers and require a change in gear now."

Last month the National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a revised Recovery Plan for the Northwest Atlantic Population of the loggerhead sea turtle, the first revision since 1991.

The recovery plan identifies 208 actions needed to achieve recovery of the Northwest Atlantic population of the loggerhead sea turtle, including new regulations to require turtle excluder devices in fisheries where they are not now required.

"Loggerhead sea turtles face many domestic and international threats, and thousands die around the world every year," said Jim Balsiger, acting assistant administrator for NOAA's Fisheries Service. "This plan will help our agency and our partners to conserve and recover the species by providing a blueprint to address threats in the northwestern Atlantic."

The northwestern Atlantic sea turtle population includes the northern Gulf of Mexico.

Florida accounts for more than 90 percent of the loggerhead nesting in the United States, and is one of the two largest remaining loggerhead nesting locations in the world. The other is on the beaches of Oman on the Arabian Peninsula.

Loggerheads dug more than 35,000 nests on Florida beaches last year, more than in 2007, which were the lowest nesting levels in the 20 year history of the state's monitoring program. But this increase did not reverse the long-term declining trend between 1998 and 2008, according to Florida wildlife officials.

Generally, female turtles nest on the same beaches each season. Many scientists believe that hatchlings, when grown, return to their natal beaches to nest.

Threats to loggerhead survival include bottom trawlers that drag heavy gear across the ocean floor; longline and gillnet fisheries; legal and illegal harvest; vessel strikes; beach armoring; beach erosion; marine debris ingestion; oil pollution; light pollution; and predation by raccoons and feral hogs, among other native and exotic species.

The highest priority actions include monitoring trends on nesting beaches; maintaining the current length and quality of protected nesting beach; and acquiring and protecting additional properties on key nesting beaches; reducing vessel interactions with loggerheads; and maintaining the federal Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage Network.

Because loggerheads migrate into the waters of many countries, the plan recommends that the federal government work with foreign nations to eliminate commercial and subsistence harvest; and enact regulations to minimize loggerhead bycatch in their fisheries.


Read more!

Last whale stranded in Australia dies

Yahoo News 25 Jan 09;

HOBART, Australia – The last survivor among a group of 45 sperm whales that became stranded on a remote Australian sandbar died Sunday, ending a long and disappointing rescue effort.

The whales became stuck on a sandbar just off the island state of Tasmania's northwest coast on Thursday. Officials who rushed to the site to help survivors found only seven alive, and began pouring water over the semi-submerged mammals to keep them cool as they tried to devise a plan to free them.

But survivor numbers dwindled each day. The last one, which had hung on for more than three days but was hemmed in behind the bodies of others in the pod, died Sunday afternoon.

"We were aiming for a rescue but the longer the rescue took the more remote (the chances of a rescue) became, and the whale died," said Warwick Brennan, a spokesman for the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries.

Earlier Sunday, rescuers gave up hope of saving the last survivor.

"We are administering palliative care," said Chris Arthur, a spokesman for Tasmania's Parks and Wildlife Service.

The animals — the largest up to 60 feet (18 meters) long and weighing up to 22 U.S. tons (20 tons) each — were too heavy to lift free of the sandbar, Arthur said.

Ironically, the thick blubber that insulates the animals when they swim in deep Antarctic waters has posed one of the greatest dangers.

"The blubber, which is a real asset to them in the deep cold waters, just really makes them heat up quickly," Brennan told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio earlier Sunday.

Strandings happen periodically in Tasmania, where whales pass during their migration to and from Antarctic waters.

Scientists do not know why the creatures get stranded, but they suspect in this case that rough conditions in the narrow channel between the island and the mainland had churned up sediment in the water and confused the pod's sonar navigation.

Last November, 150 long-finned pilot whales died after beaching on a rocky coastline in Tasmania despite frantic efforts to save them. A week earlier, rescuers saved 11 pilot whales among a pod of 60 that had beached on the island state.

Sperm whales become stranded less often than other species because they spend most of their time in deep waters, away from the coastline. But scientists say ocean currents and feed stocks have brought them closer to shore.

Officials have said the carcasses would be left in place to rot or be eaten by scavengers.

Last of 48 stranded whales dies in Australia
Yahoo News 25 Jan 09;

SYDNEY (AFP) – The last of 48 sperm whales beached in southern Australia died on Sunday despite efforts to rescue it from among the bodies of its dead companions, officials said.

"Obviously we were aiming for a rescue but the longer the rescue took the more remote it became, and the whale died," said Tasmania state government spokesman Warwick Brennan.

The pod of whales became trapped last week on a sandbar 150 metres (yards) off Perkins Island on the northwest coast of the island state of Tasmania. By the time they were discovered on Thursday almost all had perished.

High winds and ocean swell prevented rescuers from floating the two whales who survived through Friday night out to sea, and by late Saturday Brennan said just one was still alive.

The last whale died on Sunday evening.

Brennan said the sandbar was in an area that was inaccessible for machinery, and it would have been difficult to move the corpses trapping the last survivor.

Male sperm whales can grow to 18 metres and females 12 metres in length, weighing between 20 and 50 tonnes.

More than 150 long-finned pilot whales died after beaching themselves on Tasmania's remote west coast in November.

Tasmania, Australia's southern island state, experiences about 80 percent of whale beachings in the country, a phenomenon so far unexplained by science.


Read more!

World's highest drug levels entering India stream

Margie Mason, Associated Press Yahoo News 26 Jan 09;

PATANCHERU, India – When researchers analyzed vials of treated wastewater taken from a plant where about 90 Indian drug factories dump their residues, they were shocked. Enough of a single, powerful antibiotic was being spewed into one stream each day to treat every person in a city of 90,000.

And it wasn't just ciprofloxacin being detected. The supposedly cleaned water was a floating medicine cabinet — a soup of 21 different active pharmaceutical ingredients, used in generics for treatment of hypertension, heart disease, chronic liver ailments, depression, gonorrhea, ulcers and other ailments. Half of the drugs measured at the highest levels of pharmaceuticals ever detected in the environment, researchers say.

Those Indian factories produce drugs for much of the world, including many Americans. The result: Some of India's poor are unwittingly consuming an array of chemicals that may be harmful, and could lead to the proliferation of drug-resistant bacteria.

"If you take a bath there, then you have all the antibiotics you need for treatment," said chemist Klaus Kuemmerer at the University of Freiburg Medical Center in Germany, an expert on drug resistance in the environment who did not participate in the research. "If you just swallow a few gasps of water, you're treated for everything. The question is for how long?"

Last year, The Associated Press reported that trace concentrations of pharmaceuticals had been found in drinking water provided to at least 46 million Americans. But the wastewater downstream from the Indian plants contained 150 times the highest levels detected in the U.S.

At first, Joakim Larsson, an environmental scientist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, questioned whether 100 pounds a day of ciprofloxacin could really be running into the stream. The researcher was so baffled by the unprecedented results he sent the samples to a second lab for independent analysis.

When those reports came back with similarly record-high levels, Larsson knew he was looking at a potentially serious situation. After all, some villagers fish in the stream's tributaries, while others drink from wells nearby. Livestock also depend on these watering holes.

Some locals long believed drugs were seeping into their drinking water, and new data from Larsson's study presented at a U.S. scientific conference in November confirmed their suspicions. Ciprofloxacin, the antibiotic, and the popular antihistamine cetirizine had the highest levels in the wells of six villages tested. Both drugs measured far below a human dose, but the results were still alarming.

"We don't have any other source, so we're drinking it," said R. Durgamma, a mother of four, sitting on the steps of her crude mud home in a bright flowered sari a few miles downstream from the treatment plant. High drug concentrations were recently found in her well water. "When the local leaders come, we offer them water and they won't take it."

Pharmaceutical contamination is an emerging concern worldwide. In its series of articles, AP documented the commonplace presence of minute concentrations of pharmaceuticals in U.S. drinking water supplies. The AP also found that trace concentrations of pharmaceuticals were almost ubiquitous in rivers, lakes and streams.

The medicines are excreted without being fully metabolized by people who take them, while hospitals and long-term care facilities annually flush millions of pounds of unused pills down the drain. Until Larsson's research, there had been widespread consensus among researchers that drug makers were not a source.

The consequences of the India studies are worrisome.

As the AP reported last year, researchers are finding that human cells fail to grow normally in the laboratory when exposed to trace concentrations of certain pharmaceuticals. Some waterborne drugs also promote antibiotic-resistant germs, especially when — as in India — they are mixed with bacteria in human sewage. Even extremely diluted concentrations of drug residues harm the reproductive systems of fish, frogs and other aquatic species in the wild.

In the India research, tadpoles exposed to water from the treatment plant that had been diluted 500 times were nonetheless 40 percent smaller than those growing in clean water.

The discovery of this contamination raises two key issues for researchers and policy makers: the amount of pollution and its source. Experts say one of the biggest concerns for humans is whether the discharge from the wastewater treatment facility is spawning drug resistance.

"Not only is there the danger of antibiotic-resistant bacteria evolving; the entire biological food web could be affected," said Stan Cox, senior scientist at the Land Institute, a nonprofit agriculture research center in Salina, Kan. Cox has studied and written about pharmaceutical pollution in Patancheru. "If Cipro is so widespread, it is likely that other drugs are out in the environment and getting into people's bodies."

Before Larsson's team tested the water at Patancheru Enviro Tech Ltd. plant, researchers largely attributed the source of drugs in water to their use, rather than their manufacture.

In the U.S., the EPA says there are "well defined and controlled" limits to the amount of pharmaceutical waste emitted by drug makers.

India's environmental protections are being met at Patancheru, says Rajeshwar Tiwari, who heads the area's pollution control board. And while he says regulations have tightened since Larsson's initial research, screening for pharmaceutical residue at the end of the treatment process is not required.

Factories in the U.S. report on releases of 22 active pharmaceutical ingredients, the AP found by analyzing EPA data. But many more drugs have been discovered in domestic drinking water.

Possibly complicating the situation, Larsson's team also found high drug concentration levels in lakes upstream from the treatment plant, indicating potential illegal dumping — an issue both Indian pollution officials and the drug industry acknowledge has been a past problem, but one they say is practiced much less now.

In addition, before Larsson's study detected such large concentrations of ciprofloxacin and other drugs in the treated wastewater, levels of pharmaceuticals detected in the environment and drinking water worldwide were minute, well below a human dose.

"I'll tell you, I've never seen concentrations this high before. And they definitely ... are having some biological impact, at least in the effluent," said Dan Schlenk, an ecotoxicologist from the University of California, Riverside, who was not involved in the India research.

And even though the levels recently found in Indian village wells were much lower than the wastewater readings, someone drinking regularly from the worst-affected reservoirs would receive more than two full doses of an antihistamine in a year.

"Who has a responsibility for a polluted environment when the Third World produces drugs for our well being?" Larsson asked scientists at a recent environmental research conference.

M. Narayana Reddy, president of India's Bulk Drug Manufacturers Association, disputes Larsson's initial results: "I have challenged it," he said. "It is the wrong information provided by some research person."

Reddy acknowledged the region is polluted, but said that the contamination came from untreated human excrement and past industry abuses. He and pollution control officials also say villagers are supposed to drink clean water piped in from the city or hauled in by tankers — water a court ordered industry to provide. But locals complain of insufficient supplies and some say they are forced to use wells.

Larsson's research has created a stir among environmental experts, and his findings are widely accepted in the scientific community.

"That's really quite an incredible and disturbing level," said Renee Sharp, senior analyst at the Washington-based Environmental Working Group. "It's absolutely the last thing you would ever want to see when you're talking about the rise of antibiotic bacterial resistance in the world."

The more bacteria is exposed to a drug, the more likely that bacteria will mutate in a way that renders the drug ineffective. Such resistant bacteria can then possibly infect others who spread the bugs as they travel. Ciprofloxacin was once considered a powerful antibiotic of last resort, used to treat especially tenacious infections. But in recent years many bacteria have developed resistance to the drug, leaving it significantly less effective.

"We are using these drugs, and the disease is not being cured — there is resistance going on there," said Dr. A. Kishan Rao, a medical doctor and environmental activist who has treated people for more than 30 years near the drug factories. He says he worries most about the long-term effects on his patients potentially being exposed to constant low levels of drugs. And then there's the variety, the mixture of drugs that aren't supposed to interact. No one knows what effects that could cause.

"It's a global concern," he said. "European countries and the U.S. are protecting their environment and importing the drugs at the cost of the people in developing countries."

While the human risks are disconcerting, Sharp said the environmental damage is potentially even worse.

"People might say, 'Oh sure, that's just a dirty river in India,' but we live on a small planet, everything is connected. The water in a river in India could be the rain coming down in your town in a few weeks," she said.

Patancheru became a hub for largely unregulated chemical and drug factories in the 1980s, creating what one local newspaper has termed an "ecological sacrifice zone" with its waste. Since then, India has become one of the world's leading exporters of pharmaceuticals, and the U.S. — which spent $1.4 billion on Indian-made drugs in 2007 — is its largest customer.

A spokesman for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, representing major U.S. drugmakers, said they could not comment about the Indian pollution because the Patancheru plants are making generic drugs and their members are branded. A spokesman for the Generic Pharmaceutical Association said the issues of Indian factory pollution are "not within the scope of the activities" of their group.

Drug factories in the U.S. and Europe have strictly enforced waste treatment processes. At the Patancheru water treatment plant, the process is outdated, with wastewater from the 90 bulk drug makers trucked to the plant and poured into a cistern. Solids are filtered out, then raw sewage is added to biologically break down the chemicals. The wastewater, which has been clarified but is still contaminated, is dumped into the Isakavagu stream that runs into the Nakkavagu and Manjira, and eventually into the Godawari River.

In India, villagers near this treatment plant have a long history of fighting pollution from various industries and allege their air, water and crops have been poisoned for decades by factories making everything from tires to paints and textiles. Some lakes brim with filmy, acrid water that burns the nostrils when inhaled and causes the eyes to tear.

"I'm frustrated. We have told them so many times about this problem, but nobody does anything," said Syed Bashir Ahmed, 80, casting a makeshift fishing pole while crouched in tall grass along the river bank near the bulk drug factories. "The poor are helpless. What can we do?"

AP National Writer Martha Mendoza contributed to this report from California.


Read more!

Nepal Capital Chokes With Trash On Streets

Gopal Sharma, PlanetArk 23 Jan 09;

KATHMANDU - Tons of garbage dumped on the streets in Kathmandu have left the Nepali capital choking in what is proving a new headache for the embattled government headed by the Maoist former rebels.

Disposal of waste has been a chronic problem in the hill-ringed Nepali capital and recent attempts to dump garbage in a small landfill site at Okharpouwa, a village outside Kathmandu, have met with resistance from the local residents.

Ashok Shahi, chief of the state-run Solid Waste Mobilization and Management Center overseeing the handling of the trash, said locals had erected barricades to stop garbage trucks, forcing residents to dump rubbish on the city streets.

He said the crisis has left Kathmandu, home to ancient pagoda temples and palaces that attract thousands of foreign tourists, strewn with estimated 6,000 tons of waste for nearly three weeks now.

"This is disgusting," said Ishwar Ban, an official of Nepa International, a small hotel in the tourist hub of Thamel in the heart of Kathmandu, home to two million people.

"This leaves a very bad impression about the country among the tourists who have no choice but to wear a mask or close their nose as they walk past the stinking rubbish," Ban said, while bags of rotting trash were piled up on a street close by.

The crisis is a fresh embarrassment for the new government headed by the Maoist former rebels, who ended a decade-long civil war under a 2006 peace deal and won the election for a special assembly in April last year.

The former guerrillas are also struggling to end an acute shortage of electricity that has left the impoverished Himalayan nation without electricity for up to 16 hours a day.

(Editing by Bappa Majumdar)


Read more!

Blame game as Mexico City trash piles up

Sophie Nicholson Yahoo News 25 Jan 09;

MEXICO CITY (AFP) – Residents of Mexico City face fines for failing to separate their trash as pressure mounts for the closure of the main, overweight, landfill in one of the world's largest cities.

Garbage disputes are nothing new in the sprawling, polluted urban area of some 20 million inhabitants, but as the trash piles up so do fears of long-term health and environmental damage.

Without taking into account the greater urban area, Mexico City produces more than 12,000 tonnes of waste every day.

"The aim should be zero waste in Mexico City because there's no land, there's nowhere foreseen to deposit waste in these quantities," said Ramon Ojeda Mestre, secretary general of the International Court of Environmental Arbitrage, involved in the city's latest trash debate.

Each citizen now creates a daily average of 1.41 kilos (3.1 pounds) of waste, compared with 800 grams (1.8 pounds) 20 years ago.

Eco-minded Mexico City mayor Marcelo Ebrard, the leftist Democratic Revolutionary Party, wants citizens to be more responsible for their trash, by separating organic and non-organic waste.

"We're going to carry out a very big campaign, we'll reward people who do things well, we'll sanction those who do them badly," Ebrard told AFP.

The campaign gives the city's 16 districts 150 days, from the start of the year, to apply a new waste separation law.

Citizens who fail to separate their waste could face fines of up to 7,000 pesos (almost 500 dollars), or up to one million pesos for dumping building waste in parks or conservation areas.

"The biggest challenge is to change some habits; not all of them but some of them," Ebrard said.

Recycling has existed here for decades, however, but with economic, not environmental, motives and many citizens who do not pay taxes for trash collection see no reason for change.

Chilangos, as Mexico City residents are known, simply mix all their trash together and pay tips to unsalaried garbage workers to collect the bags and carry out the separation themselves, selling on useful bits for profit.

Hundreds of other waste workers carry out further often dangerous recycling among toxic materials on rubbish dumps, including on the massive Bordo Poniente landfill in eastern Mexico City, festering in a political dispute over its closure, which was postponed last July and again this month.

Mexico City authorities who manage it are seeking more time to find what they say will be a more ecologically friendly alternative. But federal authorities, from the rival National Action Party and who own the land it sits on, seek a rapid shutdown of the near-full dump, citing environmental concerns.

Ebrard plans several new high-tech waste treatment sites to replace the landfill, but so far only one site has been found and it will not be ready for two years.

He also plans to transform the bio-gas it emits into electric energy and has attracted a pledge to help from the Bill Clinton foundation.

"A precipitated closure could create serious environmental damage," Martha Delgado, the city's environment secretary, told AFP. "We really want an in-depth solution to the problem. All we need is more time."

But federal authorities say the city authorities want to avoid payment of an estimated one billion pesos to shut Bordo Poniente safely and for new landfills to replace it.

"The problem is that they have to pay and they're not ready to invest adequately in waste management," charged Mauricio Limon Aguirre, a top federal environment official.

"It's not our responsibility," he added.

Observers blame both sides for refusing to help solve the problem, while the dump further pollutes its surroundings as the dispute drags on.

"It's contaminating the air, the ground, the underground water," said Ojeda Mestre, who has threatened to take both governments to international courts in the matter.

Neither government has carried out adequate campaigns against the generation of rubbish, or for waste separation, despite previous laws, Ojeda Mestre added.

Ebrard, however, said his new campaign would make a long-term difference.

Starting this year, the city will force big businesses to pay for their trash collection.

"If you have a chain like Walmart, why don't they pay for waste? We have to start with the big waste generators," Ebrard said.

"What will remain from what we've done is changes in society's habits."

But many are skeptical at a time of belt-tightening in other areas amid growing evidence the financial crisis will hit hard below the US border.

So far, there are few signs of equipment for citizens to use to separate their trash, or of sites or new rubbish trucks to receive it.

Jorge, 38, has worked on a rubbish truck in the central Cuauhtemoc district for 18 years.

Separating orange skins from cardboard boxes into plastic bags on the back of his truck, he said past campaigns had failed to produce changes.

"Citizens haven't responded in the way they were hoping for. There isn't a culture for that," he said.

His eyes lit up as he described planned modern replacements for many of the city's more than 2,000 garbage trucks.

But he added: "I don't think the government has the money."


Read more!

Ocean 'fertilisation' team ordered to halt global warming experiment

An expedition including British scientists that hoped to "fertilise" the ocean to combat global warming was last night ordered to stop because of concerns that the experiment could breach international law.

Matthew Moore, The Telegraph 25 Jan 09;

The team planned to drop 20 tons of iron sulphate into waters around the Antarctic to stimulate the growth of plankton, which would take in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Environmentalists had claimed that the experiment – aimed at creating a 186-square-mile bloom of plankton between Cape Horn and the Cape of Good Hope so big that it will be visible from outer space – could have a devastating impact on the oceans and may even speed up global warming.

The German government last night ordered scientists on the German polar research ship RV Polarstern to halt their work in the Southern Ocean, amid concerns that it may be banned under the UN's Convention on Biological Diversity.

The ship set off earlier this month, but the scientists had held off starting the experiment pending legal and environmental reviews.

Supporters of the expedition claim that the method could one day slow global warming by removing carbon from the atmosphere for centuries. The plankton fall to the bottom of the ocean when they die, taking the carbon dioxide they have absorbed with them.

Two scientists from the University of Southampton's National Oceanography Centre are on board the RV Polarstern, although the expedition is a joint Indian-German project.


Read more!

EU To Propose $200 Billion Climate Tax On Rich Nations

Pete Harrison and Gerard Wynn, PlanetArk 23 Jan 09;

BRUSSELS/LONDON - Rich nations could raise $200 billion in climate funds through a levy on their greenhouse gases from 2013-2020 to help poor countries prepare for global warming, the European Union will say next week.

The plan is set out in an EU paper outlining the bloc's position ahead of U.N.-led climate talks in Copenhagen in December, meant to agree a new, global climate treaty.

The fund-raising idea is the most specific yet from any rich country or bloc on how to persuade developing nations to agree binding, concrete steps to slow their greenhouse gas emissions -- one of the key obstacles in climate talks so far.

The draft paper to be published next week, and seen by Reuters, calls on rich countries to pay for developing countries to cut their greenhouse gases, called mitigation, and prepare for unavoidable warming, called adaptation.

"All developed countries will need to contribute to financial resources for adaptation and mitigation in developing countries via public funding and the use of carbon crediting mechanisms," it said.

Rich countries should commit to binding limits on their greenhouse gas emissions through 2020. They could then pay a set price for every ton of emissions, the paper said, under one of "two principal options to generate funding."

The other option would be to pay at rates per ton on a global carbon market, and so not guarantee a price.

If widely agreed the plan could encourage the world's top carbon emitter, China, to agree to internationally binding climate measures. That in turn could satisfy a general pre-condition made by the second biggest emitter, the United States, for signing up to a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.

The United States did not ratify Kyoto because the pact contained no concrete commitments by developing countries, a position the new Obama administration is likely to maintain regarding a successor pact after 2012.

The EU paper said that if the main developed countries paid 1 euro per ton of greenhouse gases in 2013 rising to 3 euros in 2020, that would raise 164 billion euros ($213 billion) over the period.

It called for a gradual phasing out of carbon offsetting, which allows rich nations to lay off their greenhouse gas emissions by paying for cuts in developing countries.

The EU is the world's biggest buyer of carbon offsets, and last month agreed climate targets which allowed EU states and companies to offset up to 3 billion tons of their greenhouse gas emissions from 2008-2020, or more than the annual emissions of the Netherlands.

Carbon offsetting allows developing countries, which at present face no binding climate targets, to earn money in return for curbing greenhouse gases.

The EU wants to phase out that option for "advanced developing countries," which the paper said should face binding caps instead. But it gave no timeline for the change.

EU to pressure US, emerging countries on climate change
Christian Spillmann Yahoo News 24 Jan 09;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – Eager to take the lead on climate change, the European Union aims to pile pressure on the United States and big emerging countries to sign up to an ambitious strategy to reduce greenhouse gases.

Last month European leaders approved an ambitious climate change action plan which the 27-nation bloc hopes will become a model for international negotiations in Copenhagen in December.

"We will do everything to make (Copehagen) a success," European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso told reporters on Friday. "The problem is to know whether the others are ready to do what we have been doing."

The European Commission is to unveil on Wednesday a strategy for gradually ramping up investments aimed at tackling climate change to a target of 175 billion euros per year by 2020, including 30 billion euros to help poor countries.

Developed countries would be expected to contribute 95 billion euros to the plan.

Among the sources of finance, the commission recommends making polluters pay for each tonne of carbon dioxide that they emit.

With a price starting at one euro per tonne rising gradually to three euros, the plan would generate about 13 billion euros in 2013 if used in the main developed countries, rising to 28 billion euros by 2020.

In the same strategy paper, obtained by AFP, the commission lays out 200 actions that are not expected to bear a prohibitive cost for reducing carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas.

The measures, which target the energy, agriculture and forestry sectors, would save 39 billion tonnes of CO2 from escaping into the atmosphere by 2020 at a cost of between four to 10 euros per tonne.

EU leaders committed last month to a climate-energy package that would decrease the bloc's greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent by 2020, make 20 percent energy savings and bring renewable energy sources up to 20 percent of total energy use.

With four billion tonnes of CO2 a year, the EU generates 14 percent of the 27 billion tonnes that escape into the atmosphere each year.

The United States is the biggest polluter with 5.8 billion tonnes, followed by China with 5.1 billion tonnes.

The EU hopes that it can rally other major polluters behind its approach.

"I think the most important issue for Copenhagen in terms of preparation is to have the Americans on board and afterwards the biggest emerging economies China, India, and Brazil," Barroso said.

"We have to find a consensus with the developing countries."

Barroso said that aides would head to Washington this week to meet their US counterparts.

US President Barack Obama has raised hopes in Europe that he will be more receptive to Europe's arguments than his predecessor, declaring in his inaugural address that the United States will "roll back the specter of a warming planet."


Read more!

Environmental groups hail Obama's green agenda

Yahoo News 24 Jan 09;

GENEVA (AFP) – International environmental groups have praised evidence of swift change by US President Barack Obama in his inaugural week, saying it could transform Washington from a green "pariah" into a world leader.

Senior officials at WWF and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, IUCN, told AFP they expected the shift to be felt within a month in domestic legislation and by the year end in global climate change negotiations

"He seems to be moving fast," said Julia Marton-Lefevre, Director General of the Swiss-based IUCN, a network of conservation groups, governments and companies. "It's super urgent and he knows it."

"The US reducing its (carbon) impact will already have an impact on the rest of the world," she added.

Carter Roberts, president of the US branch of WWF, said the United States was set to move "from being a laggard and even pariah on some issues to being a leader."

"This election is a turning point, not only in the United States and its actions on the environment, but also because it will have a ripple effect around the world," he said by phone during a meeting of WWF International in Switzerland.

Colleagues were deeply impressed by Obama's inaugural speech, citing especially a "multicultural outlook" that promised bridge-building with emerging and developing countries on the environment, they added.

Roberts expected the ripple effect to have an impact on China first.

Although it has set domestic targets, Beijing has been wary about Obama's campaign promises and is reluctant to commit to new international cuts in carbon emissions unless industrialised economies do more.

"I believe China is ready to take the right steps to a lower carbon economy, they want and need to take the steps with the United States," Roberts said.

Marton-Lefevre said: "China could have an impact on the US - let them sit down and talk."

Key targets for Washington mentioned by the two included a green economic stimulus package, with proposals to renovate US power generation and incentives for home energy saving, federal legislation on carbon emissions, a move to end US isolation from a global climate change treaty, and federal policy on nature conservation and biodiversity.

Despite her optimism, Marton-Lefevre doubted that Obama he would be able to deliver everything he promises and gave a month to assess his administration's environmental team's actions.

At WWF, Roberts questioned the order of action.

"The haven't committed to a timetable yet, the question is where climate (change) sits amongst other priorities," he explained.

On top of outlining policies that break out of the previous administration's mould, Obama has nominated officials and scientists with strong green credentials to key posts dealing with energy, the interior and environment.

In his inauguration speech last Tuesday, he vowed to "roll back the specter of a warming planet" and championed renewable energy.

"Each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet," Obama said.

He also addressed other nations "that enjoy relative plenty", saying that they and the United States could no longer consume the world's resources "without regard to effect."


Read more!

Gore highlights new US push on climate change

Olivier Knox Yahoo News 25 Jan 09;

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Al Gore will exhort US lawmakers to renew US leadership on battling climate change next week, as "green" groups push for quick, sweeping action from President Barack Obama and a friendly Congress.

Gore will testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday as Democrats -- who now control the White House and enjoy sizeable majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives -- seek to wield their new power.

"He understands the urgent need for American engagement and leadership on this issue. America must act decisively," ahead of December UN talks on the issue in Copenhagen, said Democratic Senator John Kerry, the panel's chairman.

Kerry "wanted to send a message that this is going to be a priority for the committee going forward this year. He wanted to set the tone, set the agenda," and get his colleagues' attention, said a committee staffer.

Gore's testimony comes as environmentalist groups hope for a 180-degree turn from what they, and much of the world, viewed as former president George W. Bush's foot-dragging approach on fighting global warming.

"We have something frankly we haven't had for eight years: Close, positive coordination between the White House and Congress," said Tony Kreindler, communications director for the Environmental Defense Fund.

"I don't think you can even begin to measure that. That's huge," Kreindler told AFP by telephone.

Obama has said he wants to commit to reducing US greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and by 80 percent in 2050, mainly through a 150-billion dollar, 10-year program to develop renewable forms of energy.

Republicans say they will apply four principles to any US steps to curb the so-called "greenhouse gases" blamed for global warming, including making sure that they do not leave the US economy at a disadvantage against rising competitors like India and China.

They will also carefully study the economic consequences of a given move, act to promote innovation in "green" technology, and ensure that any given step has real environmental benefits, they say.

Those principles largely reflect Bush's "major economies" approach, which turned on the idea that no climate change response can be effective unless other major polluters like China and India take part.

Among the early possible steps by the new president: Directing the US Environmental Protection Agency to allow California and nearly 20 other US states to regulate "greenhouse gas" emissions from automobiles.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appealed to Obama in a January 21 letter -- one day after the Democrat got the keys to the White House -- to reverse a March 2008 rejection by Bush's EPA.

The measure is among four top priorities for environmental groups like the Sierra Club, and could be among the first big steps announced by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, whom the US Senate confirmed late Thursday.

The Sierra Club also hopes Obama will direct EPA to regulate emissions from power plants as pollutants and to take steps to limit the environmental impact of the coal industry, as well as setting a target for reducing US "greenhouse gas" emissions by 35 percent by 2020, the Club said.

And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said she wants a full House vote on "cap-and-trade" legislation.

Such steps have drawn opposition from Republican allies like the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the Competitive Enterpise Institute -- and activists warn that Obama's election may actually mean a much tougher fight.

"In the past, they though such legislation wasn't going to become law, so they didn't come out shooting with all guns a-blazing," said Kreindler. "Now they have something to shoot at, and a reason to shoot at it."

"This is now Obama's policy," he said. "This is a very political target. It's not just about climate, it's about the president's agenda."


Read more!

EPA objects to coal plant, Sierra Club claims new day

Bernie Woodall, Reuters 23 Jan 09;

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Environmentalists claimed on Friday that a new era regarding coal-fired power plants had arrived with the Obama administration after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency turned back South Dakota's approval of a big coal-fired power plant in that state because of pollution concerns.

"EPA is signaling that it is back to enforcing long-standing legal requirements fairly and consistently nationwide," said Bruce Nilles, head of the Sierra Club's effort to stop coal power plants.

The EPA on Friday said the timing of the objection letter to South Dakota officials -- sent on Thursday in the third day of Barack Obama's administration -- was not related to the new president.

"It would be fair to say" that the letter would have been sent under the Bush administration, said Carl Daly, unit chief for EPA Region 8 air permit unit.

The proposed $1.3 billion Big Stone II plant near Milbank, is in northeastern South Dakota, near the border with Minnesota. About half of the power from Big Stone II would be sent to Minnesota.

Daly, of the EPA's Denver office, said the South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural Resources has 90 days to correct three deficiencies it noted in the January 22 letter.

"We fully expect that the state will be able to address our concerns in the 90 days we have given them," said Daly.

Once those concerns are met to EPA satisfaction, construction may begin, he added. The plant would be 500 megawatts to 580 MW, enough to serve more than 400,000 homes.

Nilles still declared victory and called the EPA letter the end of the project because it would increase costs, making it too expensive to build.

Big Stone II is a joint effort of five utilities in five states, led by Minnesota-based Otter Tail Power.

E-mails and phone calls to officials at Otter Tail and to spokesman for the consortium for Big Stone II were not returned.

Obama has said he supports advanced technology for coal-burning power plants that could capture the CO2 emissions. That technology is not yet commercially viable. Coal plants generate half of U.S. electricity supply.

After a lull in coal power plant construction in the 1980s and 1990s, President George W. Bush's administration pushed for coal power plant construction and utilities advanced plans for almost 200 of them starting in 2002.

Nilles said by his count 14 were constructed or are being built after receiving environmental permits -- coal advocates claim about 20 -- while 80 have been canceled largely due to state regulatory or financial pressures. Another 80 coal plants are still in the pipeline, Nilles said.

Environmentalists say Big Stone II would emit 4 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. CO2 accounts for 80 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, which scientists say causes global warming.

"As the first major coal plant decision by the EPA since President Obama took office, this decision signals that the dozens of other coal plant proposals currently in permitting processes nationwide will face a new level of federal scrutiny," the Sierra Club and Clean Water Action said Friday.

On January 15, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission unanimously approved transmission powerlines linked to Big Stone II, which was believed to have cleared the way for construction of the plant to start.

(Additional reporting by Tom Doggett in Washington)


Read more!