Best of our wild blogs: 7 Dec 09


Hantu Dive
from Pulau Hantu with more photos and yet more photos

Fist time encounter with this Star on Semakau
from Where Discovery Begins

First time to Ubin's other shores
from wonderful creation

A Family Gathering
from Flying Fish Friends

Beesy bodies
from The annotated budak

Rare bird comes to Bukit Batok kopitiam
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Eurasian Tree Sparrow on ixora plants
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Asian Koel takes a noni fruit
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Monday Morgue: 7th December 2009
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Fri 11 Dec 2009 @ TMSI (ridge): Gary Dickinson on "A wound-healing model for barnacle adhesion" from ecotax at Yahoo! Groups


Read more!

Haphazard tree planting poses problems

Straits Times Forum 7 Dec 09;

WE REFER to last Saturday's letter by Dr Praema Raghavan-Gilbert, 'Are only VIP trees protected?', on residents' efforts to nurture trees in Marsiling estate.

Sembawang Town Council supports planting and gardening activities in the common area. We advise residents to keep their potted plants in a neat manner in front of their units. This is to maintain a neat and clean environment, and also to avoid causing obstruction to their neighbours.

We do not allow haphazard in-ground planting as it may lead to mosquito breeding, soil erosion and other environmental and maintenance problems. Residents who are keen on in-ground planting are encouraged to participate in the community garden, which was constructed near Block 116, Marsiling Rise, in 2006.

We agree that existing mature and healthy trees that do not pose any maintenance or other environmental issues should be retained. In addition, the town council will plant more fruit trees in the vicinity, to be adopted and cared for by residents. They are welcome to suggest the type of fruit trees they would like to see in their community.

Sembawang Town Council has discussed with the Marsiling Zone 2 Residents' Committee to arrange a meeting with the residents. We will share with them the proposed plan by the residents' committee and town council, and we welcome feedback from them.

Dr Raghavan-Gilbert said the community garden is not accessible. All members of the Community Garden Club are given keys to the garden and are able to carry out their gardening activities as and when they are free. Dr Raghavan-Gilbert and other residents who are keen on gardening are encouraged to join the club, to share their gardening interest and experience with their fellow residents.

The town council is of the view that this is a more balanced approach to catering to residents' interests in gardening, maintaining a pleasant and safe environment and, at the same time, helping to enhance community bonding.

Soon Min Sin
General Manager
Sembawang Town Council


Read more!

More Singapore couples choose eco-friendly weddings

Zhao Quan Yin/Evelyn Choo, Channel NewsAsia 6 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE: The evening glow is just right at the Garden of Seasons for newlyweds Kevin Tan and Claire Chua.

They are among 150 couples who have chosen to get married in parks this year. They are also going eco-friendly on the use of materials.

"Our wedding flavours are tea infusions and we included rose hip flowers in it. So it is very much in line with the garden theme and it is something people can use over and over again," said the couple.

This new colourful theme garden at HortPark is designed to host intimate events in a romantic setting.

Going greener, NParks is encouraging couples to have environmentally-friendly weddings.

"Weddings generally generate quite a lot of waste, so we are trying to use this occasion to remind people that environmental-consciousness is actually a very important part of our lives," said Yvonne Cheng, manager, Marketing and Promotions, National Parks Board.

A gown has been created out of recycled materials - such as fabric covers of used wedding albums, and crystals and beads from damaged jewellery. And couples can learn more about such initiatives at the Garden Wedding Fair at HortPark on December 12.

The fair will feature more than ten lush gardens and parks, where couples can tie the knot.

- CNA/sc

Say 'I do' to green weddings
More options now for couples to help save the environment while pledging their love
Victoria Vaughan, Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

This wedding gown by WhiteLink is made of plastic wrapper, fabric scraps and other recycled materials. -- ST PHOTO: SAMUEL HE

GO GREEN for your big day and save on the cost of the wedding venue.

The National Parks Board (NParks) announced the 20 per cent discount offer at the opening of its latest wedding venue, known as the Garden of Seasons, at the HortPark off Alexandra Road.

For now, the discount applies only to the non-air-conditioned venues at HortPark, which charge between $85 and $260 an hour. NParks has not decided if the offer will be extended to its other six parks, where weddings are also held.

To qualify for the discount, the couple have to show NParks they have taken at least eight environmentally friendly measures for their wedding. These include using recycled paper for the invitations and using a hybrid bridal car.

NParks' director of parks Kong Yit San hopes the scheme will 'inspire more people to do their part in saving the environment and reducing the large amounts of waste that weddings usually generate'.

There has been an increase in the number of couples tying the knot in parks, although it is not clear if this is due to the novelty factor of having an outdoor wedding, or that people are becoming more environmentally conscious. So far this year, there have been 150 weddings held in the parks, compared with 130 last year, and there are already 90 bookings for next year.

However, these numbers still represent only less than 1 per cent of the total number of weddings. A vast majority of the 24,000 couples who got married last year did so indoors in venues such as hotels or places of worship.

However, some wedding planners said that environmental awareness is on the rise among couples.

Spellbound Weddings' Anna Lim tries to talk couples into reducing waste by using recycled paper or opting for china instead of disposable plates.

'This can add a further $3 to $4 to the price per guest, but about 90 per cent of couples are willing to pay the extra fee as china looks nicer,' she said.

'I believe that as the popularity of green weddings rises, catering companies will start doing this and may absorb the cost.'

Caterers such as ISS Catering Services are also offering biodegradable ware for wedding functions. Said its marketing manager Josephine Lin: 'We're being asked about these options a lot more by couples.'

Candy Floriculture, a wholesaler of plants and flowers, offers potted plants instead of cut flowers for decorations, which helps cut down on waste. Said its director Sharon Goh: 'We rent the plants out...It's cheaper and they create a nice environment for the wedding.'

Couples are also going for 'greener' bridal gowns, which cost about 20 to 30 per cent less than normal ones. For example, bridal boutique WhiteLink has three gowns, which cost between $300 and $1,200 to rent, made from recycled material as part of their green efforts.

The designers use fabric from older gowns, floral decorations from wedding cars, fabric covers of used wedding albums and crystals from damaged jewellery to create the dresses.These gowns will be displayed at the Garden Wedding Fair on Saturday at HortPark, the first such fair organised by NParks to offer tips on green weddings.

Mr Andrew Ong, 31, a project manager for a non-governmental organisation, will hold his wedding next March at Fort Canning, chosen so his guests can get there by public transport.

The couple will use fans instead of air-conditioners, recycled paper for the invitations and a hybrid bridal car. The caterer will use biodegradable ware, and shark's fin soup will not be served.

'We'll be going against certain norms, but it's important that we understand how we contribute to a negative effect on the Earth,' he said.

8 ways to love the Earth
Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

TO ENCOURAGE couples to hold environmentally friendly weddings, the National Parks Board is rolling out a 'Green Wedding Special', in which a couple will receive a 20 per cent discount off the venue's rental at HortPark if their wedding incorporates at least eight 'green' practices.

1. Invitation: Go paperless and use e-mail invitations, or use recycled paper.

2. Stationery: For menus and place cards, print limited copies using recycled paper or reusable materials such as chalk boards.

3. Attire: Rent the gowns and suits. Chose gowns made from recycled materials.

4. Venue: Use a non-air-conditioned venue such as the Garden of Seasons at HortPark. There are also six other parks here where you can hold outdoor weddings. These are: Bedok Reservoir Park, East Coast Park, Fort Canning Park, Labrador Nature Reserve, Pasir Ris Park and Sengkang Riverside Park. Couples can also tie the knot at the Singapore Garden Festival in July next year at Suntec City.

5. Transportation: Rent a bus to ferry your guests about during the day, or encourage them to carpool. For your own bridal vehicle, use a hybrid car.

6. Decorations and bridal bouquet: Use potted plants instead of cut flowers. You can also get your florist to wrap a small potted plant for your bridal bouquet.

7. Catering set-up: Use biodegradable ware or other environmentally friendly alternatives such as banana leaves or china.

8. Wedding favours: Give out wedding favours made of eco-friendly or recycled materials.

A dream green wedding
Today Online 7 Dec 09;

SINGAPORE - Saving the environment can now go hand in hand with saving costs for your dream wedding.

Couples can avail of a 20-per-cent discount at the National Park Board's (NParks) green wedding venues at the HortPark in Alexandra Road (picture), if they can prove that they will take at least eight environmentally-friendly measures for their big day.

The measures may include using a hybrid car for the big day, printing invitations on recycled paper and using bio-degradable cutlery.

"Weddings generally generate quite a lot of waste, so we're trying to use this occasion to remind people that environmental-consciousness is actually a very important part of our lives," said Ms Yvonne Cheng, Manager for Marketing and Promotions of NParks.

Charges for the venues in HortPark are between $85 and $190 per hour, depending on their location. A team there will assess whether couples who want to apply for the discount under the "Green Wedding Special" meet the criteria.

NParks said it is still considering whether to extend the offer to its six other parks.

Yesterday, it also launched a new wedding venue at HortPark called the "Garden of Seasons".

Newlyweds Kevin Tan and Claire Chua said they were inspired to include several green elements in their wedding there.

"Our wedding favours are tea infusions and we include rose hip flowers in it, so it's very much in line with the garden theme and it's something people can use over and over again."

NParks said the design of the new venue will be changed every three months to reflect the four seasons.

Couples can learn more about the green initiatives at the Garden Wedding Fair at HortPark this Saturday.The first wedding fair organised by NParks will also feature more than ten lush gardens and parks where couples can tie the knot.

This year, there has been an increase in the number of couples who held their weddings in parks, according to NParks.

From January to November, there were more than 150 such weddings plus about 30 bookings this month, compared to more than 130 weddings last year.


Read more!

Festive turkey dinners could cost the Earth

Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

DREAMING OF A GREEN CHRISTMAS is a three-part weekly series leading up to Christmas which looks at how environmentally friendly some of the festive traditions are. This week, we look at the prevalence of turkeys at Christmas lunches and dinners. Next Monday, we look at how green Christmas trees are.
By Kimberly Spykerman & Grace Chua

TURKEY is a festive season must-have at hotel Christmas buffets and family dinners, with demand shooting up every November and December.

The frozen birds are flown in from as far away as Brazil and the United States, and their carbon footprint - a measure of the greenhouse gases caused by a product - could be substantial.

Dr Matthias Roth, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore's geography department, said: 'Meat consumption relies on the meat production industry or factory farms which produce meat for the consumer at very high rates.

'It is generally accepted that a meat-heavy diet has a significant impact on pollution, water scarcity and land degradation. All these sectors produce significant contributions to man-made greenhouse gas emissions.'

A British study estimated in 2007 that all the turkey dinners consumed in Britain each year were responsible for 51,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions - equivalent to driving around the world 6,000 times.

That figure was for traditional meals for eight, including the turkey and stuffing, roast potatoes and vegetables, bread sauce, cranberry sauce and other dishes, and assumed one-third of the population was tucking into such a meal.

In Singapore, the amount of turkey imported shoots up in September and October, as wholesalers stock up for the American Thanksgiving celebrations in November and Christmas in December.

The time lag is because it takes four to six weeks for the birds to be shipped here from as far away as the US, Brazil and Chile.

In the September and October peak months, more than 150 tonnes of the frozen meat are imported on average each month, compared with less than 40 tonnes in a typical month.

Supermarkets and butchers say that there is little demand for the meat for the most part of the year, but that orders start pouring in towards the end of November.

Ms Kellie Webster, communications and office manager of The Butcher, a butchery near Holland Road, said: 'We've got turkeys coming out our ears at Christmas and Thanksgiving.' She added that they sell about 300 turkeys in the two-month period, compared with the usual 20 in a month.

Most major supermarkets such as FairPrice, Cold Storage and Sheng Siong offer turkey only during the festive season. Demand for the meat at the supermarkets usually jumps between 10 per cent and 30 per cent during this period.

The year-end turkey overload is to be found at hotels too. For instance, the InterContinental Singapore orders eight more turkeys a day than its usual three, while the Shangri-La Hotel uses 1,800kg to 2,200kg of turkey, compared with virtually none during the rest of the year.

It is not just the turkey that adds to the footprint, but also the trimmings associated with it. Bagged stuffing mix, cranberries, brussels sprouts and potatoes all have to be imported as well.

In the British turkey-dinner assessment, most of the food, including the turkey, was produced within Britain. Only the cranberry sauce was imported from the US - and it contributed to half the carbon budget for transport.

But do not go substituting turkey for roast beef either: Beef production consumes more energy and produces more carbon dioxide than poultry. By some reckoning, it contributes 78 per cent to carbon emissions from livestock farming, versus 8 per cent from poultry.

If you want to go green this Christmas, the best way is probably to 'eat local' so that meats and produce do not need to be flown from the other side of the world to land on your plate.

This reduces the carbon emissions from transport, but consumers must ensure the food production methods - such as the use of feed and fertilisers - do not generate more greenhouse gases than production methods overseas.

For instance, tomatoes grown in sunny Spain result in less carbon dioxide than out-of-season tomatoes grown in heated British greenhouses.

So, instead of turkey, have chicken. Or pair the turkey with local veggies instead of imported ones.

Or - the unthinkable, perhaps - have a vegetarian Christmas dinner.

A diet of greens does not mean that carbon dioxide emissions are not produced - the amount is simply reduced as it takes more fossil fuel energy to produce and transport meat than to deliver equivalent amounts of protein from plants.

And Singapore has to import most of its food.

'Researchers have found that the difference between a red meat diet and a vegan diet in terms of greenhouse gas emissions is similar to the difference between driving a sedan and driving an SUV,' said Dr Roth.

So, tuck into a black pepper steak - made entirely of flour and soya beans.

That is what animal lover Louis Ng does when his family digs into ham and beef for Christmas dinner - things he enjoyed before he became a vegetarian 10 years ago.

'Everybody says it tastes the same as the real thing...I've even cooked it for my grandmother and she couldn't tell the difference,' said Mr Ng, who is the executive director of the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society, an animal welfare group.

In the US, more options for vegetarians to enjoy a 'turkey dinner' have been sprouting. These meat substitutes, usually made of wheat protein and tofu, even come packaged with all the trimmings, like stuffing made with mushrooms, apples and butternut squash.

Unfortunately, supermarkets such as FairPrice and Sheng Siong say they do not carry such products.


Read more!

D is for dirty pet stores

Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

Pet store owners have been told to attend courses to brush up standards. Kimberly Spykerman and Lester Kok check out the worst of the shops.

ONE tank with brightly coloured fish had a dead frog floating in it. Another tank had water so murky that the fish could barely be seen. Empty tanks were stained with algae, and muddy water was puddled everywhere on the floor.

DPS Fashion Enterprise, an aquarium in Serangoon Central, had its D grading tacked carelessly on the store's wall - the lowest ranking given by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) to pet stores in Singapore. This year, it has handed out four Ds.

The stores were guilty of selling sick or underage animals, overcrowding and/or maintaining poor conditions.

The grading system, introduced in 2007, is meant to raise retail standards, and to ensure that the animals housed in pet stores are properly cared for. No store was graded D in the first year. One D surfaced last year.

The good news is that more stores have received A and B grades - shops that made it into these categories formed about 85 per cent of the 256 pet stores rated this year.

Last week, all pet shop owners in Singapore were told they had to go back to school to take a course on pet management, a move that industry veterans have said is unnecessary.

Still, the AVA wants to avoid having to hand out any more D grades.

At Teck Whye Aquarium in Choa Chu Kang, 46 cages were lined 12m across and piled 2m high at the front of the store.

About 20 to 30 birds were crammed into every cage, each of which was about 1m in length. AVA regulations state that in a cage of that size, any more than 10 small birds is considered overcrowding.

Keeping too many animals in a cage increases the risk of disease, said veterinarian Cathy Chan.

Cramped quarters also help spread parasites and gastro-intestinal diseases through the faeces of the animals.

'All these diseases can be prevented by good animal husbandry,' Dr Chan said.

Long Hu Pets Enterprise had rows of fish tanks squeezed into narrow aisles, wet floors and equipment strewn all over.

During two visits made by The Straits Times, barely any customers went into the shop. The few who did left empty- handed, but seemed unfazed by the store's D rating.

Said one customer who declined to be named: 'It doesn't make a difference to me...It looks like any typical aquarium.'

According to the husband-and-wife team who have run the aquarium for the past 12 years, business has dropped to less than half of what it used to be a year ago.

They now rely on their small base of regulars, who drop by once or twice a month. They do two or three sales a day.

Pet Stop in Upper Serangoon had three certified staff members carrying out pet grooming, and handling sales of pet products and dogs.

The shop went from a B grade a year ago to a D grade this year because the place had a strong dog smell and because it had housed two clients' dogs overnight, which pet shops are not allowed to do.

Mr Eric Cheong, who set up the shop 10 years ago, said he was just doing the customers a favour.

'They have been our customers for years, and they trust us to handle their dogs,' the 30-year-old said.

DPS Fashion Enterprise and Teck Whye Aquarium displayed their D certificates, but Long Hu did not. As for Pet Stop, it was still displaying its old B grade.

An AVA spokesman said stores risk being fined if they fail to display their grades, though no one has been fined yet.

Stores rated D have to send their staff for remedial training by AVA, and they risk being shut down if they consistently receive the same grade.

This year, there were 80 complaints made against the 277 pet stores operating in Singapore; about 30 were fined. The complaints were mostly about the sale of unhealthy or underage animals, overcrowding and unsanitary conditions.

Stores that do not comply with the rules can be taken to court. The most recent case was in 2006.

Mr Cheong at Pet Stop said he no longer takes in customers' dogs. Instead, he refers them to pet hotels.

'Last month, I engaged a cleaner, so the odour has also been reduced,' he said.

In contrast, the boss of Long Hu Pets Enterprise, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan, said he did not care what grade he got.

'If they want to give a D, then they give a D. It is up to them,' he said in Mandarin.

'AVA said I have to rearrange my shop and clean it up to improve.'

He said that business has been especially poor this year, as fewer people care to spend money on ornamental fish in bad times.

But he is not willing to improve the layout or come up with incentives to attract more customers.

'Even if I give discounts, if no one comes to buy, what is the point?'


D IS FOR 'DON'T CARE'

'If they want to give a D, then they give a D. It is up to them. The AVA said I have to rearrange my shop and to clean it up to improve.'

Long Hu Pets Enterprise's boss, who wanted to be known only as Mr Tan

Report card for pet shop owners

# April 2007 (when grades were given only for shops selling dogs, cats and small mammals such as hamsters): 31 As, 68 Bs and 11 Cs.

# May 2008 (when grades were given for all kinds of pet shops): 42 As, 150 Bs and 54 Cs.

# December 2008: 45 As, 172 Bs, 53 Cs and 1 D.

# November 2009: 71 As, 148 Bs, 33 Cs and 4 Ds.

Want pet shop licence? Take course first
Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

ALL pet shop owners and their staff will have to go back to school.

If they want to keep their licences or get one to sell pets, they will need to sit through 16 hours of lectures, eight hours of practical workshops, and take a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test at the end of it.

Dog farm operators, who breed and import dogs and supply them to pet shops, will also have to take the pet care management course conducted by Temasek Polytechnic (TP), said the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA).

The cost of the course has not been finalised, but the AVA said that the participants will be able to get a 90 per cent subsidy under the Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience, or Spur.

The course will cover the regulations of the industry, how to handle and care for animals, how to give health checks to animals and how to determine the sex of pets.

It will be split into three components - companion pets (dogs, cats and small mammals), fishes and birds.

The first workshop, to be held in March next year, will be for the pet retailers who deal with companion pets. In all, there are about 120 shops that do so.

Fish and bird retailers will be taught in later phases.

TP also offers a diploma in veterinary technology.

Dr Diana Chan, the course manager for the diploma and the pet care management course, said: 'There will be hands-on training where the lecturer will demonstrate how to handle the pets in a safe and responsible way.'

Dr Chan will conduct the course with three other veterinarians.

The MCQ test will be on what participants have learnt in the course. 'We don't want to make it so stressful,' she said.

Mr George Tan, 37, owner of Joy Doggy, said the course would be useful for new pet shop operators, but less so for seasoned retailers. 'The lecturers may not go in depth on how to protect our own dogs from getting sick,' said the pet shop operator of 13 years.

But the executive director of Pet Mart, Mr Benjamin Wee, feels that the course would update his knowledge of new developments in the industry. 'It is always good to improve,' the 34-year-old said.

LESTER KOK


Read more!

Indonesia uses love and war to rein in wild elephants

Trainers deploy the Flying Squad, a tamed herd, to face off or mate with aggressive pachyderms as a way to keep them from straying and rampaging beyond the confines of their forest sanctuary.

John M. Glionna Los Angeles Times 2 Dec 09;

Reporting from Tesso Nilo National Park, Indonesia - The wild bull elephant stood menacingly in the clearing, trumpeting in annoyance and anger, its brain racing with a chemical that unleashes a throbbing and unceasing headache.

It was the heart of mating season, and the bull was desperately seeking a mate.

Was this really a good moment to be sitting on top of another elephant just a few hundred feet away?

But Syamsuardi, a native of the wild Sumatran forest, had his strategy ready: He would pit his own elephant against the amorous stranger.

The compact 37-year-old, who like many Indonesians goes by one name, manages the Flying Squad, a herd of tamed elephants that patrols the more than 200,000-acre park like jungle Guardian Angels.

In many nations, dwindling forests have brought deadly conflict between man and animal. In Sumatra, rampaging elephants that have wandered out of parks and into populated areas have long been shot or poisoned by officials or vengeful property owners.

Syamsuardi's team is the local brainchild of the World Wildlife Fund, which borrowed the idea from India. The goal: persuade the intruders to simply get lost, to return to their sanctuary, where lethal run-ins with humans are far less likely.

With the Flying Squad, brute force isn't the only option.

The team sometimes dispatches a female to mate with the aggressor, a tactic that has not only defused tension but also produced two offspring from the wild elephants: Tesso and Nella.

But confronting the angry bull, Syamsuardi sensed this showdown wouldn't end so easily.

Perched atop Rachman, the Flying Squad leader, he and the other mahouts, or handlers, positioned two males and two females side by side, never taking their eyes off the intruder. Then they moved slowly forward, a multi-ton battering ram, with each handler atop his elephant, awaiting the big bull's charge.

Syamsuardi recalled the terror of knowing he'd be exposed to piercing tusks and the collisions of gigantic bodies. Caught in the middle, he would be crushed like an insect.

"It's tense, but you must be calm and stay quiet," he said. "I have to be ready to think quickly because when the time comes, my elephants are waiting for my command."

Elephants are losing the battle over the vanishing jungle.

The forests that once covered Sumatra's Riau province -- home to the largest elephant population in Indonesia -- are disappearing.

In the last 20 years alone, the paper and palm oil industries have cut down 60% of the pachyderm habitat. Now just 10% of the remaining forest is suitable for elephants. Since 1985, the province's elephant population has plummeted to 350 from 1,600. About 80 elephants live within Tesso Nilo National Park.

At least once a month, wild herds from the park attack one of the nearby settlements, activists say. Since 2007, 13 elephants and several residents have been killed in Riau province alone.

"If given a choice, elephants would prefer never to see humans," Syamsuardi said. "But the problem is that humans continue to invade their territory. There's not enough jungle left."

In 2004, after a rash of animal rampages, Syamsuardi began his monumental task: shape a team of wild animals into an obedient police force.

Then a World Wildlife Fund outreach worker, he knew little about elephants. So he began reading up on the animals and working with them in the field.

Now he and his staff of eight handlers foster a bond with their elephant wards. For mahouts such Adrianto, 26, it means a soothing voice interspersed with strict commands.

One day, Adrianto took the 26-year-old Ria and her 2-year-old calf, Tesso, for a bath in a forest watering hole. Ria trudged though the jungle, grabbing leaves with her trunk, her feet leaving large craters in the soft dirt.

At the murky pond, she waded into the water like a four-legged sumo wrestler, with Adrianto on her back. As the animals luxuriated in the cool water, their trunks shooting quick bursts of water, Adrianto scrubbed their backs, talking softly in Indonesian.

"Don't be naughty," he told Tesso, who nudged him with a forehead sprouting unruly black hairs. Then he pushed the baby's head underwater and scrubbed behind its ears.

"Ria is an actress," he said later, perched comfortably on her neck as though riding a big movable easy chair. "She pouts unless she gets what she wants."

The mahouts treat obedient animals to brownies. But there are sticks that come with such carrots. When Ria resists, Adrianto whacks her hard on the head with a small stick with a metal end that he uses for discipline. Tesso gets a stick shoved into his ear when he gets too frisky.

Before a routine patrol, Syamsuardi showered affection on Ria, rubbing her cheek and neck. He has grown to love these big animals and fears for their future.

"They're incredibly loyal," he said. "When a mahout falls during a fight with a wild bull, the herd will surround him in protection."

They are also immensely powerful. An elephant can topple a pickup truck with one nudge of its forehead. In villages, the animals are referred to as datu, or mister, a term of respect given no other jungle creature.

Syamsuardi has seen the results of their fury. Every few weeks, they rampage through settlements for food and out of anger or frustration.

"The male pierces victims with its tusks and then throws them with its trunk. If they are still moving, he'll stomp them," he said. "Females mostly kick. Either way, it's a tragic way to die."

Syamsuardi uses elephant face-offs as a last resort. And his methods have worked: So far, none of the mahouts have been hurt.

The team first tries to scare aggressive herds by setting off carbide cannons to scare them away. At night, rangers use car lights and blasts of the horn.

If the mating option is used, the team finds a secure spot for the ritual, which can last a week. (The mahouts then get lost, to give the animals a little privacy.)

If the team decides that it's better to make war, not love, fights between the Flying Squad and aggressors can last for hours.

As the bull stomped in warning, the Flying Squad approached. The lineup, designed to confuse the invader so it can't tell which elephant is pack leader, came within a few feet.

Finally, the bull lunged at Rachman. Tusks flashing, the two animals collided. Syamsuardi hung on as the other elephants closed in around the intruder, like a gang tackle on the football field.

The fight lasted a tense and sweaty 35 minutes, during which the big animals swung their heads, bearing their tusks like swords, their bodies like battering rams. Finally, the bull moved off into the brush.

For now, Syamsuardi knew, the big animal was safe.

"I was so satisfied. We didn't have to kill that bull," he said. "We just gave him a message: Go back to the forest with your own kind. You'll live longer that way."


Read more!

Reforestation the right path to take

Michael Richardson, For The Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

WHERE does South- east Asia rank in greenhouse gas emissions?

The short answer is that the region is an important source of worldwide emissions, mainly from deforestation. And it is expected to become a bigger source in future.

Asean countries are also vulnerable to the predicted effects of climate change, including rising sea levels and extreme weather. They cannot afford to be passive bystanders in Copenhagen.

In April, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) published a report saying South-east Asia contributed 12 per cent of the carbon dioxide, methane and other global warming gases from human activity in 2000. This was almost certainly an underestimate, since the survey covered only five Asean countries (Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam).

The ADB found that cutting or burning of forests to convert the land to plantations and other uses was by far the biggest source of South-east Asia's emissions, contributing 75 per cent of the region's total. The energy sector contributed 15 per cent, and agriculture 8 per cent, mainly methane from growing rice in water-saturated fields.

The ADB based its calculation on statistics that were nine years old. However, the report noted that Southeast Asia's total greenhouse gas emissions were rising at a faster rate than the global average because the region's economic growth was higher.

Checking emissions is a far-from- exact science, particularly when information from many developing countries is scant. The profile also changes from year to year. While Singapore and Malaysia have significantly reduced emissions of carbon dioxide by switching to gas in generating electricity, other Asean countries have intensified their use of more carbon-intensive coal in power generation.

Energy conservation and efficiency measures of the kind announced last week by Singapore would reduce the rate of emissions growth if they were applied across the region. However, for South-east Asia, the greatest potential for cutting emissions is in forestry. The panel of scientists and officials advising the United Nations climate change summit estimates that in 2004, deforestation was responsible for just over 17 per cent of the world's greenhouse emissions.

A study published last month by scientists affiliated to the Global Carbon Project concluded that this figure fell to 12 per cent last year, down from 20 per cent in the 1990s, probably because wet conditions limited forest fires in South-east Asia, where Indonesia has been the main source of emissions.

Researchers have said that in some drought years, when forest fires raged out of control and peat swamps dried out and caught fire, Indonesia was the world's third largest greenhouse gas emitter, after China and the United States.

One way to prevent the emissions level from rising again would be for negotiators to agree on a proposed scheme that would pay Indonesia and other tropical forest nations not just to halt logging, but also to re-plant degraded forests and plant new ones.

The scheme being discussed in Copenhagen, known as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (Redd), still faces serious problems. But it is among the issues that appear to have achieved the most progress in the negotiations.

'That is because we are looking at a huge global emissions source,' said Mr Paul Winn, forest and climate campaigner for Greenpeace Australia. 'There is also the recognition that it is a relatively cheap, easy form of emission reductions.'

Some rich countries, such as the US and Australia, want Redd to be structured so that their energy-intensive companies can offset emissions at home by paying for forest conservation and expansion in developing countries.

While corruption, illegal logging and mismanagement of forests will be big obstacles in implementing any agreed Redd scheme, the potential for expanding forests is huge. Last month, the Global Partnership on Forest Restoration announced that new satellite surveys had shown that more than a billion hectares of former forest land and degraded forest could be restored to healthy forests. That is the equivalent of around 6 per cent of the planet's total land area. Many of the most promising forest restoration opportunities identified by the satellite mapping are in South-east Asia.

Forests once covered more than half of the world's land area. Today, that figure is below 30 per cent and each year a further seven million hectares of forest are lost.

Halting and then reversing this loss will not be easy. But if developed countries are prepared to underwrite a global reforestation programme, it could help both the climate and the rural poor.

The writer is a visiting senior research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Read more!

‘Time is Running Out’ for Sumatra’s Rainforest as Demand for Palm Oil Soars

Arwa Damon, Jakarta Globe 6 Dec 09;

Driving through Indonesia's central Sumatra, it appears that all life on earth has been obliterated, like a scene from some apocalyptic movie.

The land is tinted a sick gray. Some parts still smolder. Twisted hulks of tree trunks take on abnormal shapes. It is nearly impossible to imagine that this was once lush tropical rainforest.

Nearby the rolling hills are covered in a sea of emerald green. But it is not a natural forest — it is a palm plantation.

In supermarkets worldwide products containing palm oil — soaps, chocolates, margarine and cosmetics — fly off the shelves. Most consumers have no idea these products contain palm oil, often labeled as vegetable oil, and even less of a clue that conservationists are singling it out as being one of the main driving forces behind deforestation.

Clearing forests for agriculture isn’t exactly new, but palm is quickly becoming the crop of choice. It is fast growing with high yields, global demand now tops 40 million tons a year, and it’s central to the economies of Malaysia and Indonesia.

But the rate at which Indonesia’s natural forests are being torn down has made this tropical nation one of the world’s largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Already, 85 percent of Sumatra’s forests are gone and what is left is disappearing at an alarming rate.

“We are running out of time here. We are at the end of the tunnel,” Peter Pratje, of the Frankfurt Zoological Society, said at an orangutan sanctuary in the heart of Sumatra. Sumatran orangutans are expected to be the first great ape to go extinct — due to the loss of their natural habitat.

“The problem is there is no second chance,” Pratje adds. “If you shut down an ecosystem that is hundreds of years old you can’t regrow it.”

It is a reality that even the largest buyers and producers of palm oil acknowledge. Consumer products giant Unilever spearheaded a movement towards sustainable palm oil cultivation — the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil — which gathered palm producers, manufacturers and green groups to seek out a sustainable way to cultivate palm.

“If agriculture cannot be made sustainable then we as a food and home and personal care company are in trouble,” Unilever Jan Kees Vis explained.

But critics like Greenpeace fault the RSPO’s standards for being too weak and say that they cannot control their members.

“If a company is doing deforestation and peat land destruction, we cannot say the company is sustainable,” said Greenpeace activist Bustar Maitar.

At the moment, only 3 percent to 4 percent of globally produced palm oil is certified by the RSPO. It is a drop in the bucket now, but the RSPO expects the volume to double in the next year.

But that probably will not be enough to save Sumatra’s forests. Conservationists say that it is time for companies to control their desire for more money, governments to start seriously enforcing forest protection laws and individuals consumers to take on responsibility and make lifestyle changes.

For Sumatra, it might already be too late.

Arwa Damon is an international correspondent for CNN.

Reporter's notebook: Palm oil production devastating Sumatran forests
Arwa Damon, CNN 11 Dec 09;


Read more!

Sumatra rainforests turned into smoldering ruins

Arwa Damon, CNN 6 Dec 09;

Sumatra, Indonesia (CNN) -- The land still smolders, tinted with a depressing gray. Twisted hulks of tree trunks take on abnormal shapes. A dark black canal cuts through the wasted landscape.

It looks like a scene from an apocalyptic movie where an unknown force has obliterated all life. But this is the reality of Sumatra, Indonesia's largest island.

The Kampar Peninsula was once virgin rainforest, some of the most biodiverse in the world. The region has now been transformed into a lifeless plain, soon to be replanted with monocultures.

Environmental groups describe the degradation as rampant pillaging -- the work of multibillion dollar paper, pulp and palm oil conglomerates.

Already 85 percent of Sumatra's forests are gone. What is left is vanishing at an alarming rate -- an area the size of 50 football fields disappears every hour, according to Greenpeace and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Caught in the crosshairs are small villages like Teluk Meranti.

The village lies on Sumatra's Kampar River. As dawn breaks, fishermen set out into the morning haze. The riverbanks slowly come to life as residents bathe and brush their teeth in its waters. The morning calm is broken by children's shrieks as they lather their bodies before jumping in.

"The communities here recognize how important the forest is to them. They use the wood to make their homes, their fishing boats," says Bustar Maitar, a Greenpeace campaigner. "If the forest is gone, it means their livelihood is gone."

What is at stake is much more than that, environmental groups say. The peat soil of the Kampar Peninsula holds more carbon than anywhere else in the world. Greenpeace estimates that if this whole peninsula, some 1.7 million acres (700,000 hectares), is taken over by plantations, the carbon dioxide released would be the equivalent of 1.6 billion transatlantic flights.

In the middle of this complex struggle between preservation and destruction are the villagers.

A man named Yusuf says his family has been here for four generations and survived without big companies and their big promises.

One such company is Asia Pacific Resources, one of the world's biggest pulp and paper companies.

In June, community leaders wrote to Asia Pacific Resources, asking that the land be left alone for the sake of their grandchildren.

The company says it's bringing 20,000 jobs and sustainable development to the area. According to Neil Franklin, the company's sustainability director, Asia Pacific's intention is to use the Kampar region as a model for sustainable development.

"Plantations aren't developed on all those areas which are given to us by the government. A very careful mapping process goes on before we start any developments at all," Franklin said. "Kampar Peninsula is an area where these high conservation values are most threatened and we most certainly are aware of that. The key is how do you manage and maintain those values."

He said the model that Asia Pacific is offering is based on a balance of economic, social and environmental concerns. Solutions, the company says, will minimize carbon dioxide emissions and maximize the benefit to adjacent communities.

The promise of a more financially fruitful life is a powerful lure for some of the most poor villagers. Yusuf admits that more and more villagers, especially the younger generations, are being tempted by the companies.

"We can't do anything. We don't have power, we don't have an education, we don't have money. They have divided us."

The confrontation is so tense that Syamsuar, a school teacher who sided with the companies, agreed to talk with CNN, only away from prying eyes.

"The company has committed to developing plantations for us, for our future," he said. "They will build the public facilities that we need. For example, a mosque. They will create new job opportunities for us."

Still he said, he wants international nonprofit organizations to be closely involved, in case the companies don't fulfill their promises.

Greenpeace's Bustar says the companies promise, only to deceive.

"I am very sad to hear that conversation," Bustar said of the school teacher's comments. "Why? Because I believe this person is already influenced by the company. I try to give them examples of other villages where there is no deal until now -- there is no delivery of the company promises, but the company already cut down the forest."

For Bustar, it's personal. He is from the Indonesian province of Papua, where he grew up watching his people lose their land to big companies, he said.

"Some people, they die to protect their land," he said. "That gives me the spirit to continue this fight."

Indonesia does have strong laws governing deforestation, but environmental groups say they aren't enforced nearly enough. Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono recently pledged to reduce emissions, and Indonesia could benefit from the growing market in carbon credits if it preserves its forests.

Greenpeace is among many environmental groups calling on the government to issue a moratorium on the plantation concessions, before it's too late.

If the forests aren't protected, "we will fail to protect our future," Bustar said. "It means we will fail to protect our Earth where we are living. It means disaster is coming to us."


Read more!

Four New Species of King Crabs Discovered

LiveScience Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

Kings crabs are among the ocean's largest crustaceans, so you'd think scientists might know quite a bit about them.

As with much in the sea, however, there is much to learn.

In fact today researchers announced they'd found four new species of king crabs, brining the total known to 113.


The image shows Lithodes galapagensis, the only king crab species yet recorded from the seas around the Galapagos Islands. Credit: NOCS

Importantly, one of the new species lives around the Galapagos Islands, in warm water. King crabs had once been thought to be confined to chilly climes.

"We are only now beginning to understand the incredible diversity of animals living in the deep sea," said Sally Hall, a doctoral student at the University of Southampton and the discoverer of the new species.

"King crabs include some of the largest crustaceans currently inhabiting Earth," Hall said.

The new species are Paralomis nivosa from the Philippines, P. makarovi from the Bering Sea, P. alcockiana from South Carolina, and Lithodes galapagensis from the Galapagos archipelago.

It is now clear that species of deep-sea king crab live in most areas of the world's oceans, but many more species remain to be discovered.

"The oceans off eastern Africa, the Indian Ocean and the Southern Ocean are all particularly poorly sampled," said Hall: "We need to know which king crab species live where before we can fully understand their ecology and evolutionary success."


Read more!

Wolf recovery at crossroads in the Southwest

Susan Montoya Bryan, Associated Press Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – A decade has passed since the federal government began returning endangered Mexican wolves to their historic range in the Southwest. It hasn't worked out — for the wolves, for ranchers, for conservationists or for federal biologists.

And that has resulted in frustration and resentment by many involved in the reintroduction program along the Arizona-New Mexico border, a landscape of sprawling pine and spruce forests, cold-water lakes and clear streams.

"I believe in being a good steward of the land and preserving it for generations to come, but this is ridiculous," said Ed Wehrheim, who heads the county commission in Catron County, in the heart of wolf country. "I've had ranchers' wives come to me just bawling because everything they and their parents have worked for is going down the drain."

Four ranches have gone out of business since the wolf reintroduction began and another four are expected to do the same before next summer, Wehrheim said.

The region has been hit by drought and cattle prices aren't what they used to be, but Wehrheim said pressure from environmentalists and hundreds of livestock kills by Mexican gray wolves over the past decade have only made things worse.

Environmentalists argue that grazing practices are part of the problem and the wolf reintroduction program has failed because of mismanagement by the federal government.

In the middle stands Bud Fazio, coordinator of the Mexican gray wolf reintroduction program.

The program is at a crossroads and Fazio said he hopes to bring everyone back to the table to find a way to move forward, quell concerns of critical environmentalists and gain the confidence of wary ranchers.

"One thing about wolves is they bring out extreme emotions and feelings and attitudes, so it is an extra challenge," he said. "There is some middle ground. There is some balance, but my sense is that so far we haven't found that in the Southwest and we need to."

A subspecies of the gray wolf, the Mexican wolf was exterminated in the wild by the 1930s. The government began reintroducing wolves in 1998 along the Arizona-New Mexico line, in a territory of more than 4 million acres interspersed with forests, private land and towns.

There are about 50 wolves in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico, but that's half of what biologists had hoped to have by now.

Federal, state and other officials involved in wolf recovery are scheduled to meet next week in Albuquerque for the first of many "frank discussions" about the future of the program, Fazio said.

Part of the reason for the talks is a recent settlement with environmentalists that called for an end to a three-strikes rule that allowed wildlife managers to trap or shoot wolves that had killed at least three head of livestock within a year.

The settlement also made clear that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has control over the program, rather than a committee formed in 2003 to bring other agencies into the recovery effort.

The original rule that established the reintroduction program still allows managers to remove problem wolves, but Fazio said officials will now consider many factors — such as the wolf's genetic value to the program and its reproductive success — before making decisions on keeping an animal in the wild.

"Everything remains on the table in terms of an option for managing wolves and that does include removal of live animals or lethal removal," Fazio said. "What is different is that a whole suite of things, broader than before, will be taken into account."

Wehrheim and the New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association maintain the settlement changes nothing because the wolf program had already started to leave wolves with more than three strikes in the wild. They pointed to the Middle Fork pack, which was blamed for 10 livestock kills in two months.

The pack includes four pups and two adults, both of which are missing their front left paws.

Federal biologists say the pack is now hunting elk and relying less on strategically placed food caches.

Ranchers say that leaving the maimed wolves in the wild encourages them to go after easy prey such as calves.

"It's a problem of the program, not a problem of the wolf," Catron County Manager Bill Aymar said.

The Center for Biological Diversity also has been critical of the program, but the group believes the wolves should be left in the wild and critical habitat declared for the species to recover.

Wehrheim told New Mexico legislators in Santa Fe this week that ranchers in southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona can't afford to live with the wolves if the program remains unchanged and the federal government's plan for compensating livestock losses goes unfunded.

"It's very, very serious for Catron County and all of the wolf recovery area," he said. "We don't see any ranching existing with the wolf. We don't see any hunting existing with the wolf. We're talking tens of millions of dollars of loss."

He gave the example of a third-generation ranch that harvested about 200 calves annually before going out of business earlier this year. The operation was capable of bringing in more than $1 million in tax and other revenues to the county.

Tod Stevenson, director of the New Mexico Game and Fish Department, testified that his agency and the state want to make sure Catron County and its ranchers can survive on the landscape.

"That's the best way that we can continue to manage wildlife, is to have them as partners out there on the ground," he said. "It's critical that we come up with a balance to achieve that."


Read more!

Species survival counts too

University of Queensland Science Alert 7 Dec 09;

Queensland researchers have unveiled a new strategy for saving the world's forests on the eve of crucial climate change talks in Copenhagen.

Published today in leading journal Science, the research suggests wealthy countries participate in a carbon payment system to encourage developing countries to keep their forests to avert a looming extinction crisis, in addition to avoiding dangerous climate change.

Experts from the University of Queensland and James Cook University assessed the ability to slow down species extinctions using both carbon-focused and biodiversity-focused strategies.

“We found that, dollar for dollar, a carbon-focused approach will contribute little to slowing biodiversity loss and save far fewer species than will a biodiversity-focused strategy that targets the most imperilled forests,” said lead author and the University of Queensland researcher Oscar Venter.

The study reveals if carbon payments focus narrowly on carbon and ignore threatened biodiversity, carbon-trading alone won't be enough to stave off large-scale extinctions of tropical species, according to co-author Dr Kerrie Wilson from the University of Queensland.

“The problem is that the Amazon basin in South America, where there's still quite a lot of surviving forest, is the cheapest place to reduce emissions, but threatened species are concentrated in countries like Madagascar and the Philippines, where only a few scraps of forest remain,” said co-author Professor William Laurance from James Cook University.

Fortunately, the authors found that a compromise is possible.

“If you tweak things a little, putting some carbon funds into countries that are good value for carbon but also biodiversity-rich, like Cameroon and the Philippines, you can save twice as many threatened species and still do a great deal to combat global warming,” said co-author and director of the University of Queensland's Ecology Centre Professor Hugh Possingham.

Mr Venter said billions of dollars will be spent on forest carbon initiatives in the next decade, and these could hold huge benefits for vanishing ecosystems and wildlife if engineered in the right way.

The team's findings are expected to draw much attention at the forthcoming climate negotiations in Copenhagen, where international leaders are hoping to hammer out a final strategy for combating global warming.


Read more!

Earth Checkup: 10 Signs of the Planet's Health

livescience.com Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

With world leaders gathering at a U.N. summit in Copenhagen to brainstorm ways to quash increasing temperatures and hold back rising seas, LiveScience takes a look at the state of Earth's ecosystems and its inhabitants - from polar bears to us. Here are 10 signs of how well (and not-so-well) our planet is doing.

10. Arctic Meltdown

After dramatic meltdowns in recent summers that have left Arctic ice thinner than in the past, some scientists are increasingly worried about the future survival of Arctic sea ice. One recent study estimated that Arctic waters could be ice free during the summer in as few as 30 years, much sooner than previous estimates. Such catastrophic melt could reinforce the global warming trend and further imperil Arctic residents, from humans to narwhals and polar bears, which were first listed as an Endangered Species in May 2008.

9. Collapsing Antarctic Ice

Antarctica has seen its share of melt as well: In April, an ice bridge believed to pin the Wilkins Ice Shelf in place snapped. Wilkins is one of nine Antarctic ice shelves that have receded or collapsed in recent decades - the most dramatic collapses were those of the Larsen A and B shelves, which abruptly crumbled in 1995 and 2002, respectively. Most of the dramatic melting has occurred in the Antarctic Peninsula, the only part of the southernmost continent that juts north of the Antarctic Circle. In contrast, the interior of the frozen continent was thought to be cooling, but earlier this year, new research suggested that these vast ice sheets are also experiencing warming, though the trend has so far been masked by the cooling influence of the ozone hole. The 47 countries that have ratified an agreement called the Antarctic Treaty have agreed to tourism limits to protect the continent's fragile ecosystems.

8. Ozone Hole Recovery

It's been more than 20 years since scientists discovered the gaping hole in the ozone layer, which normally protects Earth's denizens from the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays. Since then efforts to ban or reduce the chemicals that eat away at the ozone in the stratosphere have initiated the gradual recovery of the hole. This recovery will take decades, though, because these pollutants hang around for a long time. So far the ozone hole over Antarctica has remained about the same size, fluctuating year to year with changes in wind circulation patterns. While it will still take some time for the ozone hole to recover, if countries hadn't acted to ban ozone-destroying substances, the situation could have been much worse.

7. Ocean Dead Zone Expansion

For years now, so-called oceanic dead zones - pockets of the sea where oxygen is so depleted that many fish, crustaceans and other aquatic species can't survive, such as in the Gulf of Mexico - have been a growing concern. These suffocating spaces are primarily formed when fertilizer runoff pours in from rivers and promotes algae blooms that eat up all the oxygen as they die and decompose. Controlling fertilizer runoff could improve the situation fairly quickly. But some studies have suggested that increased crop growth for producing biofuels could send more fertilizer running downstream.

6. Corals in Crisis

Coral reefs, sometimes called the "rainforests of the ocean," are critical marine habitats. But reefs from the Caribbean to the Great Barrier Reef have been under pressure in recent decades from overfishing, pollution, disease, warming waters and ocean acidification. Ocean waters become more acidic as they absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As the water becomes more acidic, it dissolves the minerals used by corals and other animals to build their skeletons. A 2007 study found that this stressor alone could make most current coral habitats too acidic for reef growth by 2050. And so the outcome of the climate summit in Copenhagen, where great minds are hashing out ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions among other issues, will have implications for the survival of the world's coral reefs.

5. Vanishing Forests

On land, the actual rainforests aren't fairing much better, thanks in large part to deforestation. Forested areas, particularly rainforests, are key areas of biodiversity. They also absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, and so clearing such trees could boost greenhouse gas emissions. Globally, the rate of deforestation is about 32 million acres a year, or 36 football fields a minute. This amount of forest clearing generates nearly 20 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the WWF (formerly the World Wildlife Fund). One verdant sign: Fewer trees were cut down in the Brazilian Amazon this year than since record-keeping began in 2000, according to the WWF. Even so, the Amazon did lose swaths of forest, just not as much. Asia and Africa have seen rising rates of deforestation. Forests in the United States and Europe are fairing better, as reforestation has occurred in the last decade.

4. Water Stress

It's essential to life as we know it, and though the planet's surface is two-thirds water, pollution is making it unsuitable for the humans who drink it and the animals that live in it. The effects of global warming are also altering the patterns of water availability for drinking and agriculture: Already arid regions will likely get drier, and rising sea levels could force salty sea water into normally freshwater aquifers. Some scientists say western U.S. water supplies are already being impacted by climate change and that policy advisors need to set better management practices. Depending on where they are grown, the crops used to make biofuels could stress local water supplies.

3. Atmospheric Buildup

This year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency formally declared that carbon dioxide and five other heat-trapping gases are pollutants under the Clean Air Act, paving the way for regulations of emissions. Some companies and nations have already pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but many of these goals have not been met. That and the rapid pace of development in countries like China and India have kept levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases rising globally, and at a faster rate than in previous years. China leads all nations in total emissions, but the United States is still number one in emissions per capita. Many proposals for cap-and-trade systems, methods for trapping carbon dioxide emissions underground and alternative forms of energy have been put forward, but it's up to governments and other groups to put them into action.

2. Animals in Peril

As wild lands are plowed over, built upon or otherwise altered, the animals and plants that dwell there also come under pressure. In fact, the 2009 Red List of Threatened Species issued by the World Conservation Union identified more than 17,000 species threatened with extinction out of the nearly 48,000 assessed.

Tigers, elephants, rhinos, and several species of primates are known victims of habitat change - and poaching - in Africa and Asia. Frog populations across the globe have been decimated by the spread of a deadly fungus. In the oceans, sharks, whales, dolphins and some species of fish are also hurting. The news isn't all bad, as many bird populations are recovering thanks to the ban on DDT. Polar bears were placed on the Endangered Species List last year, which means they will have protection under the Endangered Species Act. On the other end of the Earth, however, new studies have found that penguins are also in peril due to a combination of changes in climate, overfishing and pollution.

1. Humans Impacted

While we are the significant force behind much of the change to Earth's systems, those effects can come back and impact us through our health and changing environmental conditions that we must adapt to. This feedback will be magnified as human populations continue to grow. In 2007, the world population passed the 6 billion mark. That year also marked the first time in human history that more people were living in urban settings than rural areas. All 6 billion of us must compete for limited resources, including water, food and fuel. Some scientists say that we have already reached the limits of what our planet can support and that we need to curb population growth for the health of our species and the planet.


Read more!

Dubai debt woes may cut CO2 but much more needed

Andrew Newby Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

DUBAI (AFP) – Dubai's debt crisis may make a small dent in its greenhouse gas emissions but the Gulf emirate faces an enormous task to cut carbon to the levels to be proposed at the UN climate summit starting this week.

Dubai and the rest of the United Arab Emirates have the world's highest per capita carbon footprint according to the authoritative WWF Living Planet report, which says the federation must slash them 75 percent to be sustainable.

"Dubai is quite simply an environmental catastrophe," John Foster, a British Green Party member who worked in Dubai for three years and a half years, told AFP.

"Dubai is the epitome of unsustainable living at a time when 'sustainability' is the word on world leaders' lips as they gather in Copenhagen to set out a global road map to combat climate change," said Foster, former editor of Banker Middle East.

The WWF's most recent version of its study found that an average of around 9.5 hectares (23.5 acres) of land per person were needed to provide the resources and waste facilities used by people in the UAE, slightly more than the amount taken up by Americans, the second worst offenders.

If the world's resources are not to run out, the average global requirement must be reduced below 2.1 hectares (5.2 acres) per person, the campaign said in the biennial analysis issued in late 2008.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wants developed countries to reduce greenhouse gas production at least 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit).

Masood Ahmed, the International Monetary Fund's Middle East chief, told the Financial Times last week that the Dubai economy could contract again in 2010 after Dubai World's shock request for a six month halt to debt payments.

Phil Dickie, WWF international news editor, said the global downturn has led to a reduction in CO2 emissions in some industrial countries and "we would expect something similar" if Dubai's debt moratorium sparks a deceleration of the local economy.

However, while agreeing that the UAE has a lot of work to do, he said the UAE's rulers are fully aware of the problem and are taking action.

"We are actually cooperating with them and a former member of the WWF staff has gone to work on the Masdar project," Dickie told AFP.

The Masdar Initiative, launched by the government of Dubai's neighbouring emirate Abu Dhabi, is splashing out 22 billion dollars to build the world's first carbon neutral city.

Spread over 6.5 square kilometres (2.5 square miles), Masdar City is scheduled to house 55,000 people when ready in 2015 and will run totally on renewable energy.

Despite its rulers' environmental concerns, the UAE sold oil worth more than 100 billion dollars last year, making it the second biggest exporter in the OPEC cartel, only behind Saudi Arabia.

In June, Abu Dhabi won an international vote to host the new International Renewable Energy Agency after it promised loans worth 50 million dollars a year to promote the use of renewable energy in developing countries.

"Many see a contradiction between us being one of the largest oil exporters in the world and our seeking to house the agency," Reem al-Hashemi, a state minister, told AFP at the time.

"On the contrary, this confirms the commitment of a fossil fuel exporter to the enhancement of renewable energy. Since we export energy, we want to export all kinds of it," she added.

"The UAE is committed to environmental issues as a top priority," Hashemi said.

In September, classes started at the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, billed as the world's first graduate academic institution dedicated to research into alternative energy, environmental technologies and sustainability.

Dubai's own efforts to reduce its carbon emissions are centred on practical measures within the city. A metro rail line opened in September, the first in the Gulf Arab region, and another is under construction.

It is also building a one billion dollar tram line, which, among other stops, will link the metro network to the monorail which runs up the trunk of Dubai's iconic Palm Jumeirah tree-shaped island resort.

But Foster, who stood for the Green Party in the London constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow in the last British general election, is unconvinced.

"It's window-dressing, PR and spin, which Dubai is a master of. People will not use the metro over their 4x4s, partly because of the status of the 4x4, which has become the modern-day equivalent of a thoroughbred Arabian stallion.

"Dubai is the city of excess in every sense of the word. You can see this as you drive from the airport past manicured lawns and the grand greens of Emirates Golf Course, all soaked in water -- water that has been reclaimed at great expense in a wholly unsustainable way.

"You can see this as you drive past the unregulated construction of hordes of towers on your way to 'New Dubai' which has been reclaimed from the sea, but at the cost of a rare coral reef."


Read more!

Coal throbs at the heart of India growth engine

Reuters 7 Dec 09;

KORBA, India (Reuters) - A thin coat of coal dust covers everything from trees to houses in Korba, a coal mining town in central India which lies at the heart of the country's struggle to balance economic growth with climate change concerns.

Green Business

The air is heavy with smoke and dust spewing out of numerous mines and power plants in a region that powers hundreds of factories in the country's industrial west and lights up millions of homes.

Although India has announced a new climate plan which identifies renewable energy such as solar power as key elements, coal remains the backbone of energy supply in a country where almost half the 1.1 billion population still has no electricity.

"Coal-fired power will stay for the next 20-25 years at least," said R.D. Sonkar, chief engineer at one of Korba's many thermal power stations.

"Look at the high cost of solar and wind energy. Can we afford? Power from renewable energy will have to wait, I think."

As the world meets in Copenhagen for crucial negotiations on a global pact to fight climate change, part of the debate will be on how developing countries such as India tackle the use of fossil fuel without hampering their growth.

India, the world's fourth largest greenhouse gas emitter though still low on per-capita emissions, is under pressure to cut pollution to battle climate change while demand for power increases as its middle class clamors for more cars, TVs and housing.

India set a goal on Thursday for slowing the growth of its greenhouse gas emissions, saying it was willing to rein in its "carbon intensity" -- the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted per unit of economic output -- by between 20 and 25 percent by 2020, from 2005 levels.

ECONOMIC ENGINE

The big emerging economies have often insisted that rich nations have caused global warming by spewing out greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution, and want to see deep cuts by these rich nations before joining the effort.

Current global pacts do not require developing nations to cut emissions, but rich countries are obliged to do so.

The December 7-18 U.N. talks in the Danish capital are aimed at settling a legally binding deal after arguments between rich and poor nations about who should cut emissions, by how much and who should pay.

As the world discusses the implications of climate change and plans to cut emissions, experts say it is coal towns such as Korba that will shape India's efforts to eradicate poverty.

"There is a lot of focus on clean coal and super critical technology to increase efficiency, but coal will remain central," said Sunita Narain, member of the prime minister's council on climate change.

"There are two aspects -- affordability of coal in a country where there is a lot of poverty and large-scale generation that is required to reach power to a huge portion of the population."

Coal is seen as the solution to India's power shortage, a daunting barrier to development in a country where massive rural poverty means people cannot afford costly electricity produced from renewable sources.

Last year, the country faced a 16.6 percent shortfall during hours of peak consumption and a 9.9 percent gap for energy generation, World Bank figures show.

The country has 10 percent of the world's coal reserves, the biggest after the United States, Russia and China, but it also imported about 70 million metric tons of high grade coal this fiscal year, mostly for making steel.

The country plans to add 78.7 gigawatts of power generation during the five years ending March 2012, most of it from coal, which now accounts for about 60 percent of India's energy mix.

RENEWABLES

In comparison, renewables such as wind, solar and bio-mass contribute only 8.8 percent to generation and, though there are plans to scale up solar power generation to 20 gigawatts by 2022, it depends on international finance and technology.

A landmark nuclear deal with the United States may herald a new chapter in clean energy in India, but long gestation periods for nuclear reactors and high cost are a deterrent.

Even if the country is on track with its renewable energy plans, coal will still account for about 55 percent of its power supply by 2030, according to Indian government figures.

"Clearly, it's not a question of choice for India. Coal will remain at the core but what will change is there will be more thrust on clean coal technology," said Ashok Sharma, climate change expert at Halcrow Consulting India.

India issued a national climate change policy last year, identifying renewable energy like solar power, and energy efficiency as key elements.

Already, its carbon and energy use per unit of GDP are both below that of the United States and China. And India had only about 12 vehicles per 1,000 people in 2007 compared to over 800 in the United States.

India's industrial electricity tariffs are, on average, the highest in the world, a measure aimed at deterring wastage.

"India's focus is a combination of improved coal, enhanced efficiency, some use of gas, solar and wind power ... eventually it's about positioning yourself for the future technology," said Nitin Desai, one of the architects of India's climate policy.

"You can't immediately say I won't use coal -- you have to look at the balance of energy security."

(Additional reporting by Sujeet Kumar; Editing by Sugita Katyal)


Read more!

India's climate change dilemma

Just as its economy powers ahead, it is told to curb the engines of growth
Ravi Velloor, South Asia Bureau Chief Straits Times 7 Dec 09;

For thousands of years, Indians lived their lives in close proximity to nature, their rhythms set by the life-giving monsoons.

Cow dung cakes, brushwood and coconut shells served as fuel for their hearths. Industrialisation was slow and limited to pockets such as Kolkata, Kanpur, Chennai and Mumbai until the latter half of the 20th century.

Mahatma Gandhi, the father of Indian independence, pointedly wove his own coarse homespun garments, encouraging his flock to work on self-sufficiency and cut dependence on industrial goods. If ever a country lived by the dictum that 'small is beautiful', it was India.

That India is rapidly vanishing.

Consumer goods produced are seeping into its 600,000 villages, breaching the dykes put up by the Mahatma.

Importing far more than they export, India's growing appetite for industrial goods is helping economies in Asia, Europe and the American continent. Meanwhile, a ballooning population is pressing on its resources, from water to coal and foodgrain.

Now, when its accelerating economy is poised to lift the lives of millions from poverty, India is being told to curb the smokestacks and wheels driving its growth. And this, when 76 million Indian homes do not yet have electricity connections.

The country's carbon footprint, at 1.1 tonnes per capita, is a third of China's and one-twentieth that of the United States, comparisons that draw rage in this country when its people are told they have to curb their emissions.

So far, India's political class has stood firm against the pressure. But it is not easy to ignore friends such as US President Barack Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Last week, New Delhi shifted a tiny inch from its rigid stance, setting the first targets as it announced an intention to trim its carbon intensity by as much as a quarter by the year 2020.

'We will, on our own, cut emission intensity by 20 per cent to 25 per cent if we get support from the international community,' Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh told Parliament last Thursday. The target, he said, would be voluntary and non-binding.

India is sending Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, the most senior figure in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's Cabinet, as its top negotiator to Copenhagen.

Dr Singh himself confirmed at the weekend that he will be there, probably for the final two days, Dec 17 and 18.

But Indian officials say that while the country wants to be seen as a deal maker and not a deal breaker, much of the success of the 15th United Nations Climate Change Conference will depend on how much and how far rich nations will travel to assist the developing countries.

'Unless we have a substantial amount of financial resources put on the table and effective mechanisms for transfer of climate friendly technologies to developing countries, it would be very difficult to

really think in terms of a very substantive outcome,' says Mr Shyam Saran, Dr Singh's special envoy on climate change. 'These things are interlinked.'

In some ways, even as it resists the pressure publicly, officials here privately do not mind the global pressure to improve environmental standards.

Politicians are fully aware of the environmental challenges.

Just take the issue of sea level rise alone. India has a 7,600km coastline, and areas such as the Hooghly delta in the east and Kutch in the west are particularly vulnerable. But ministers are also aware of the unpopularity that doing right sometimes entails.

Take national capital New Delhi. Drawing strength from an order of the Supreme Court some years ago, the Delhi government ordered all trishaws and buses in the city to move to using liquefied natural gas. Polluting industries were relocated out of the capital.

Delhi-wallahs can now see starry skies again because the polluting haze that darkened the skies has vanished.

So, they happily welcome the opportunity to shift the blame somewhere else, and external pressure is a handy excuse.

Officially, India says it will guarantee only this - that at no point in time will its per capita emissions exceed that of the average in developed countries. But that is pure grandstanding and a maximum position from which it will certainly recede.

For instance, India has already dropped the demand that the developed world cut its emissions by 40 per cent by 2020.

'I am not theological about this,' says Environment Minister Ramesh. 'One has to be realistic. The PM's orders to me are to be constructive...Make sure there is an agreement.'

Where India thinks it can fix things, there is movement. Indian cars are built to European emission standards, and there are plans to raise the bar for more fuel efficient vehicles.

A dedicated rail freight corridor is being built across the breadth of the country that can move thousands of tonnes of freight far more efficiently than the polluting diesel trucks.

Meanwhile, it claims to have one of the most pro-active plans for a greener future, including a target of generating 22,000MW of electricity from solar power in 12 years.

Between 1990 and 2005, carbon intensity was reduced by 17 per cent, or about 1 per cent annually. Now, it will be further reduced by between 1.2 per cent and 1.5 per cent annually until 2020.

'In this respect, the domestic target will be important and must be supported,' New Delhi's Centre for Science and Environment, a private think-tank, said in a statement at the weekend.

Indian officials think slashing carbon intensity by as much as a third is do-able, even as they may not be able to cut total emissions.

'Energy inefficiencies in our industry are endemic,' says Mr D. Raghunandan, secretary of the Delhi Science Forum.

He says the real difficulty is not with the big polluters, but the hundreds of thousands of small-scale units.

'They just won't have the funds to acquire and shift to greener technologies,' he says.


Read more!

Can drivers be persuaded to go green?

Marc Cieslak, BBC News 4 Dec 09;

Green cars powered by alternative fuel sources have become more visible on the roads in recent years.

One cause could be the introduction of legislation and higher taxes to penalise drivers of gas-guzzling vehicles by governments around the world.

But another factor is an increase in the range of eco-friendly cars on offer. These include hybrids with a combination of petrol engines and electric motors, fully battery-powered electric vehicles and even experimental ones running on algae.

Japanese automotive giants, in particular, have been stepping up their manufacturing of environmentally-friendly cars.

Lack of infrastructure

Mitsubishi is the first to mass produce an electric car which is expected to be available for sale in Europe next year.

The firm has produced the i-Meiv which is based on an existing petrol car widely available in Japan.

The green model has seen the petrol engine replaced with an electric motor, while a lithium-ion battery is stored underneath the cabin area and also stabilises the car.

Heavy batteries can reduce the performance of a green car by weighing it down and making it slower.

The batteries can also take up to eight hours to fully charge, so these cars are a long way away from being as convenient as a quick stop at the local petrol station.

Andrew Davis, director of the UK's Environmental Transport Association (ETA), told Click that currently eco-friendly vehicles lack an infrastructure to supply them with fuel.

Although he points out that there is a practical alternative.

"Electric cars have the advantage that the infrastructure is there in the houses - people are able to drive the car onto their own drives to charge it quite easily," he said.

Free charging

Quick charging stations across Japan are attempting to speed up the fuelling time - they can charge about three quarters of the Mitsubishi i-Meiv's battery in 30 minutes for a range of around 80 miles.

Electric cars are mostly designed as city cars, but Tokyo's urban commuters have just a handful of electric charging stations.

The city is lagging behind some Western cities, such as London where there are 200 charging stations.

One Japanese chain of convenience stores is working to increase the number of charging stations with the help of local government.

Lawson stores are piloting a free charging scheme, and it runs and fuel its own fleet of electric commercial vehicles.

"In the future maybe the use of electric cars will be more widespread… that's why we are trying to introduce more charging stations," said Yuji Katayama from the store chain.

Japan is leading the way when it comes to some new technologies.

Wireless transfer

Engineers at Wasada University are collaborating with Showa Aircraft Industry on a project to replace plug-in charging stations completely.

They have adapted an electric city car to charge its batteries wirelessly through inductive charging - electromagnetic fields are used to transfer energy from the base station to the vehicle's battery.

Similar technology is found in small devices like electric toothbrushes.

The project envisages that charging plates would be placed in parking bays, or even on buses which could refuel as they allow passengers on and off.

Hydrogen fuel cells

Toyota has produced a family-sized car powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. Mixing hydrogen and oxygen creates electricity to power a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, and its only emission is water.

The cars are refuelled at a hydrogen pump, but these are as yet very scarce.

Fuel suppliers will have to invest heavily in a hydrogen infrastructure before consumers feel the vehicles are a viable option according to Andrew Davies at ETA.

"Those sorts of technologies could be used by the bus sector and the truck sector," he said.

"It might then trickle down to the private user for the private car, but we will have to see it worked in the commercial sector first," he predicted.

Watch Click on the BBC News Channel, Saturday 5 December, 11.00 (GMT).


Read more!

Public worldwide wants action on climate change: poll

Yahoo News 7 Dec 09;

LONDON (AFP) – Most people worldwide believe climate change is a very serious problem that their governments must tackle, a poll said Monday, as the landmark Copenhagen summit on the issue was set to get under way.

However the poll of more than 24,000 people also showed concern about rising global temperatures from man-made emissions has dropped in the United States and China -- the world's two biggest polluters.

Sixty-four percent of people think climate change is a "very serious" problem, up from 44 percent of those polled in 1998, according to the GlobeScan survey conducted for Britain's BBC World Service.

"The poll shows strong worldwide support for action on climate change, in spite of the recession," GlobeScan chairman Doug Miller said.

"However, the mixed opinions in the United States and China suggest leadership in Copenhagen may need to come from others," he said.

Despite the global economic downturn, 61 percent worldwide support government investment to address the issue, even if it meant that it harmed their national economy, the poll conducted in 23 countries said.

In the US and China, the largest emitters of carbon dioxide, support for government action is high, with 89 percent in communist China and 52 percent in the US.

But serious concern for the issue in these countries has fallen from 50 percent in the US in 2007 to 45 percent this year, and from 59 percent to 57 percent in China -- both below the worldwide average.

Concern in rising power India is also below average at 45 percent, along with Australia (58 percent), where legislation on a carbon-trading scheme has twice been rejected in parliament.

The poll comes as talks in Copenhagen are set to start Monday, gathering 192 nations under the flag of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Its task is to craft a global pact that will dramatically reduce carbon dioxide emissions -- invisible gases that trap solar heat and warm the atmosphere, interfering with Earth's delicate climate system.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon voiced optimism Sunday that the crunch talks would lead to binding limits for harmful emissions, but experts warn of major stumbling blocks as countries wrangle over the burden-sharing.

According to the poll, 44 percent of people -- and majorities in 10 of the 23 countries polled -- want their government to "play a leading role in setting ambitious targets to address climate change" in Copenhagen.

Some 39 percent think their government should "adopt a more moderate approach and support only gradual action."

And six percent want their government to oppose any agreement.

Support for government action is relatively high in Europe, including 62 percent in Britain, 57 percent in France and 55 percent in Germany.

Canada (61 percent), Australia, (57 percent), Japan (also 57 percent) and Brazil (53 percent) also favour strong leadership on the issue.

In the US, 46 percent want strong action -- outstripped by people wanting moderate action (36 percent) or opposition to any agreement (14 percent).

The poll of 24,071 people was conducted between June 19 and October 13.

World concerns about climate change dwindle: survey
Reuters 7 Dec 09;

COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - World concern about climate change has fallen in the past two years, according to an opinion poll on Sunday, the eve of 190-nation talks in Copenhagen meant to agree a U.N. deal to fight global warming.

Green Business

The Nielsen/Oxford University survey showed that 37 percent of more than 27,000 Internet users in 54 countries said they were "very concerned" about climate change, down from 41 percent in a similar poll two years ago.

"Global concern for climate change cools off," the Nielsen Co. said of the poll, taken in October. It linked the decline to the world economic slowdown.

In the United States, the number two emitter after China and the only industrialized nation outside the U.N.'s existing Kyoto Protocol for curbing emissions, the number of those very concerned fell to 25 percent from 34.

President Barack Obama wants to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, and plans to join more than 100 world leaders in Copenhagen at the end of the December 7-18 meeting to try to reach a new U.N. deal.

China, the top emitter of greenhouse gases, was among few nations surveyed where the number of people very concerned rose, to 36 from 30 percent.

The survey indicated the highest levels of concern were in Latin America and Asian-Pacific countries, topped by the Philippines on 78 percent which was struck by Typhoon Ketsana in September. The poll did not cover most of Africa.

Those least concerned by global warming, blamed on human emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels, were mainly in eastern Europe. Estonia was bottom with just 10 percent saying they were very concerned.

Jonathan Banks, Business Insights Director Europe of the Nielsen Co., said that worries about climate change may now be picking up with the focus on Copenhagen.

"Economic woes temporarily knocked the climate change issue off the top line agenda, but as the recession is now beginning to recede, we expect the Copenhagen summit to push this important issue to the front again," he said.

Worldwide, air and water pollution followed by climate change were the top three environmental concerns for the world population, the survey found.

(Editing by Matthew Jones)


Read more!

Climate pledges 'put world on track for 3.5 C rise'

Marlowe Hood Yahoo News 6 Dec 09;

PARIS (AFP) – Current pledges from rich and developing nations for cutting carbon pollution will stoke potentially catastrophic warming by century's end, according to a study released on Sunday on the eve of the Copenhagen climate summit.

National commitments proposed so far for the December 7-18 UN conference would mean the global temperature would rise by 3.5 degrees Celsius (6.3 degrees Fahrenheit) over pre-industrial times, way over a 2.0 C (3.6 F) threshold widely considered safe, the study said.

The study said concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) would hit about 650 parts per million (ppm), according to the tally published by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and energy specialists Ecofys.

"The pledges on the table will not halt emissions growth before 2040, let alone by 2015 as indicated by the IPCC [the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and are far from halving emissions by 2050 as has been called for by the G8," said Niklas Hoehne of Ecofys.

"Instead, global emissions are likely to be nearly double 1990 levels by 2040 based on present pledges."

The Copenhagen conference gathers the 192-member UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Its task is to craft a global pact that will dramatically reduce man-made carbon emissions -- invisible gases that trap solar heat and warm the atmosphere, interfering with Earth's delicate climate system.

Hoehne said that pledges by developed countries so far were currently projected to be 13 to 19 percent below 1990 levels.

But forest credits that these countries are likely to claim against their emission target would lower this contribution by around five percent.

The IPCC, the UN's panel of climate scientists, says cuts of around 25-40 percent reductions by industrialized countries by 2020 from 1990 levels would be needed to achieve the 2 C (3.6 F) target.

For developing countries, emissions cuts of 15 to 30 percent by 2020 against "business-as-usual" scenarios are needed to avoid crossing the 2 C (3.6 F) threshold.

Voluntary promises by China to make gains in energy efficiency and vows, also non-binding, by Brazil and Indonesia to tackle deforestation, will be a big help, said the paper.

Overall, developing country emissions are projected to be close to the IPCC range, it added.

In contrast, a report issued Sunday by climate economist Nicholas Stern and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) concluded that closing the "emissions gap" could be somewhat easier than thought.

"Existing proposals from developed and developing countries constitute a big step towards a level consistent with the 2 C (3.6 F) goal," which would require that CO2 emissions stay under 44 billion tonnes in 2020, their report said.

"Taking countries' highest intentions would take the world to around 46 billion tonnes (of carbon)," meaning that only a two-billion-tonne shortfall would have to be bridged.

To achieve this, though, "would require governments over the next two weeks and over the next few years to match words with deeds, and ambition with actions," Stern said.

"If they do, we could embark on the most dynamic and creative period of the world's economic history, an new energy and industrial revolution."


Read more!