Internship Opportunities at ECO-Singapore

Environment Challenge Organisation (Singapore), or ECO Singapore, is a dynamic youth-driven non-governmental social enterprise focussed on promoting environmental awareness in youths to enable them to make sustainable lifestyle choices.

A leading member of several regional and international environmental groups, ECO Singapore has represented Singapore at United Nations conferences and other international events.

In recent years, ECO Singapore has grown in the type and number of national and international projects undertaken, and seeks like-minded dynamic individuals to join the team in order to continue our growth momentum.

Interns can expect to find themselves in a buzzing environment that promotes personal growth and learning.

Qualities we are looking for:
(i) Passionate about conservation and the environment
(ii) Proficient in researching
(iii) Proficient in Microsoft Office
(iv) Able to maintain grace and calm under challenging conditions
(v) Able to function independently and with initiative
(vi) Possess a good sense of humour, a healthy dose of common sense and understand the dynamics of operating within a closely knit team

Commitment Period (minimum):
Two full months

Interested applicants may convey their CV and interest via email to hr@eco-singapore.org.

Short-listed candidates will be invited to a unique interactive session to clarify expectations and discover if any symbiosis exists.


Read more!

Congestion carries environmental cost too: Singapore Transport minister

Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: Traffic congestion carries an environmental cost, not just an economic cost.

That is why evening Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) has to be implemented, said Transport Minister Raymond Lim.

He was responding to a call from MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, Lee Bee Wah, for the evening ERP on the Central Expressway (CTE) to be abolished.

According to the feedback she got, Ms Lee said as the work day is over, traffic speed is no longer a critical issue for commuters driving home to Ang Mo Kio and Yishun on the CTE.

Mr Lim, however, pointed out that there are others who want a congestion-free drive home as well as a better living environment.

"Congestion extracts an economic and environmental cost. So at anytime of the day, this is the cost you have," said the transport minister.

Mr Lim also pointed out that study trips have shown that some cities in Europe put restrictions on the entry of vehicles into residential estates to safeguard standards of living.- CNA/so

Singapore Government has no plans to lower petrol duty despite high oil prices
Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: The government has no plans to lower the rate of petrol duty despite higher oil prices.

Minister of State for Finance and Transport Lim Hwee Hua said this is because petrol duty is a vehicular usage tax aimed at discouraging the excessive use of cars and promoting the greater use of public transport, and these objectives remain relevant.

Mrs Lim was replying to a question posed by MP for Aljunied GRC, Mrs Cynthia Phua, in Parliament on Friday.

Mrs Phua had asked if the government would review its tax policy on petrol, diesel and natural gas to help reduce business costs for transport operators, businesses, as well as commuters.

Mrs Lim explained that higher pump prices does not mean the government gets to collect more petrol duties.

She said: "The excise duty on petroleum is imposed on volumetric bases of 41 cents a litre for 92 and 95-octane petrol, and 44 cents a litre for petrol rated 97-octane and above. The excise duty is therefore a fixed sum per litre of petrol."

There is no excise duty on diesel, fuel oil and natural gas used for generating power.- CNA/so

Gantries in heartland to make residential estates more liveable

Clarissa Oon, Straits Times 15 Feb 08;

TAKING the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) scheme into the heartland will ease an expected islandwide traffic gridlock and make residential estates more liveable, Transport Minister Raymond Lim said yesterday.

With 850,000 vehicles on the road and more intensive use of cars than in other major cities, Singapore's arterial roads will also soon face congestion, he said in response to queries on the planned expansion of ERP coverage.

Dr Lee Bee Wah (Ang Mo Kio GRC) questioned the point of evening ERP charges along the Central Expressway (CTE), which she said is the shortest route home for Ang Mo Kio and Yishun residents.

But Mr Lim replied: Imagine a situation where heartland roads are exempted from ERP charges and only the Central Business District and expressways leading there are affected.

Drivers would then use alternative roads, including detours through the heartland and other estates.

'If you're living in a residential estate, is that what you want - gridlock?' he asked.

He said his ministry studied many European cities such as those in Switzerland and Germany, which have measures to cut down vehicle traffic in residential areas.

Congestion exacts costs on both the economy and the environment and 'going ahead, the key thing here is to have a liveable city, a quality urban living environment', he said.

Singaporean drivers clock up 21,000km a year in their cars, more than Londoners (9,100km) and even those in Los Angeles (19,800km).

In response to other questions, he said that the 16 new ERP gantries coming up this year are part of a package of measures to manage gridlock on Singapore's roads.

The measures include road and rail upgrades totalling nearly $54 billion.

This means the Government is giving back to the public more than the projected increase in ERP revenue, he said.

The increase in the number of gantries will bring the total number to 71.

'I think it is worthwhile for us to realise that when we are dealing with congestion, we can't rely on any single measure. You need a whole suite of measures,' he said.

Anyone who says he has found a panacea or a single solution is 'selling you snake oil. Ignore the medicine man, it doesn't work that way', he said.

Madam Ho Geok Choo (West Coast GRC) asked him how the $168 million in ERP revenues will be accounted for following the rate hikes.

Mr Lim said the money would go towards funding various government programmes for Singaporeans, including public transport and road projects.

From now till 2020, some $14 billion will be spent on road developments, and around $40 billion on extensions to rail lines.

While his ministry expects the additional revenue from the upcoming ERP changes to be about $70 million annually, the reduction in road tax will cost the Government about $110 million every year. It will also collect $200 million less annually due to a reduction in the Additional Registration Fee (ARF) for cars, he said.

The point of the ERP, he told Madam Ho, 'is to address congestion and is not a revenue measure'.


Read more!

China weather forecasters 10 years behind foreigners

Channel NewsAsia 15 Feb 08;

BEIJING : China's meteorologists have admitted being 10 years behind world standards, a report said Friday, after a surprise spell of freezing winter weather paralysed the country and killed more than 100 people.

"There is a 10-year gap between the Chinese (weather forecasting) model and advanced foreign models," National Meteorological Centre deputy director Duan Yihong said, according to the China Daily newspaper.

A lack of equipment also hindered meteorologists' forecasting skills, with the problem especially acute in remote mountainous areas, Duan said.

China's weather forecasters have come under scrutiny in recent weeks after large swathes of the country were hit with the coldest temperatures in decades.

The nation was unprepared for the weather, which was particularly severe in southern China, and led to the deaths of at least 107 people and more than 15 billion dollars in economic losses, according to official figures.

The three weeks of ice and snow storms, which occurred as the nation was preparing for the week-long Lunar New Year holiday early this month, crippled power and transport supplies.

This prevented millions of rural migrant workers from returning home for the festivities, which for many was their only opportunity for the year to see their families, causing much social tension.- AFP


Read more!

Business chiefs vow to lead fight against global warming

Daniel Rook, Yahoo News 15 Feb 08;

Some of the world's top companies vowed Friday to step up their efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions, saying governments were failing to show sufficient leadership in the fight against global warming.

The declaration reflects a growing trend by global corporations waging war on climate change by taking steps to reduce or offset the amount of carbon dioxide belched out by their offices and factories.

A dozen corporations including Sony Corp., Nokia Corp., Nike Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. issued an urgent call for firms around the world to reduce the damage they inflict on the planet and to promote a "low-carbon lifestyle".

"There is no doubt that climate change is one of the most important issues of our time," Sony chief executive Howard Stringer told a meeting hosted by the Japanese electronics giant and the WWF environmental group.

"Governments are more easily distracted by the crisis of today than the crisis of tomorrow," he said. "We need to act now."

The companies, which describe themselves as "Climate Savers", did not announce any new goals for reducing their carbon dioxide emissions as they have already committed to individual targets.

Instead they pledged to urge their business partners and other companies to follow their lead, to develop energy efficient products and to encourage their customers to lead an environmentally friendly lifestyle.

"We are moving into a carbon-constrained world, a low carbon economy -- a new economy," said James Leape, director general of WWF International, which is supporting the initiative.

"We need champions. There are precious few political leaders in this world yet who are stepping up to the level of action that is required.

"Climate change would wreak havoc in natural systems of all kinds, from coral reefs to mountain forests, and it could cause -- if unchecked -- upheaval in all of our lives, and in the economies on which we depend," said Leape.

Companies that fail to embrace the green revolution may struggle in the future, business leaders said.

"I don't think ... any company is going to be able to survive if it is not working in a sustainable way," said Jaime Santafe, an environment advisor at Swiss-based packaging giant Tetra Pak.

The captains of industry issued their call as officials from the United Nations and 21 countries held a second day of talks in Tokyo as part of efforts to forge a new deal on fighting global warming by the end of next year.

The closed-door talks came ahead of negotiations in Bangkok from March 31 to April 4 on reaching a deal to succeed the landmark Kyoto Protocol, whose obligations on slashing gas emissions expire in 2012.

The world's second biggest economy after the United States, Japan is the home of the Kyoto Protocol, the landmark 1997 treaty that mandated cuts in greenhouse gas emissions heating up the planet.

But Japan is far behind in meeting its Kyoto commitments. The government has refused to legally bind companies to cap gas emissions, fearing that it could jeopardise the economy's slow recovery from recession in the 1990s.

The WWF urged Japan to do more.

"I am struck that we're not yet seeing Japan leading this issue the way one would expect, and I say that because Japan has been a leader in energy efficiency historically," Leape told reporters.

Japan aims to take a lead in the debate over measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions when it hosts this year's summit of leaders from the Group of Eight industrialised nations in July at the northern lakeside resort of Toyako.

"There's a great opportunity here for Japan to lead over the next year because the G8 is so important as a political lever," said Leape.


Read more!

US Investors pledge $10 billion for renewable energy

Timothy Gardner, Reuters 14 Feb 08;

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - U.S. institutional investors pledged at a U.N. summit on Thursday to invest $10 billion over two years in technologies that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to pressure companies to disclose their risks associated with climate change.

The plan "reflects the many investment opportunities that exist today to put a dent in global warming pollution, build profits and benefit the global economy," said Mindy Lubber, the president of Ceres, a coalition of investors and environmental leaders, and director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk.

The California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. pension fund, and the state treasurers or comptrollers of 11 U.S. states and other players agreed at the investor summit on climate risk to invest the money in green technologies like solar and wind power.

The INCR has been joined by a growing number of investors as the United States, the only major industrialized country that has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions by an average 5 percent from 1990 levels by 2012, has become increasingly isolated on climate change policy.

The group also urges companies to divulge such emissions and warns them that climate change could hurt them through shareholder activism.

Florida's chief financial officer, Alex Sink, was one of the new players to embrace the green investments. Florida's Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, pledged last year to cut carbon emissions. Sink told reporters that some companies in Florida, a low-lying state at risk from flooding induced by climate change, were happy the state was joining the efforts. "Others were stunned and didn't know how to react."

John Sweeney, the president of the AFL-CIO, a federation of unions, told the summit that some of the $5 trillion of union workers' retirement funds should be invested in ways that help fight climate change. "These deferred wages of working people are the capital that can fuel the energy economy of the future," he said.

Some analysts have said green technologies like solar power, ethanol and biodiesel are forming an investment bubble that could soon pop.

Lubber said it was up to individual investors to make the right choices in green investing. "Calpers has some of the best money managers out there," she said. "Without question they are calculating those kinds of consequences."

(Editing by Eric Walsh)


Read more!

Time is up for coal: environmental analyst

Steve James, Reuters 14 Feb 08;

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The United States should leave its estimated 200 years' supply of coal in the ground and invest in wind farms and solar technology for its power-generating needs, a leading environmental analyst said on Thursday.

Wall Street, politicians and public opinion have all turned so dramatically against coal in the last year over climate concerns that it is probably "the beginning of the end of the coal industry," said Lester Brown.

He claimed in a conference call with reporters that efforts to clean up coal and develop carbon sequestration technology to prevent emissions from coal-fired power plants were too far off and would be more expensive than investing in energy efficiency and alternative power sources.

"Carbon sequestration has been something the coal industry has leaned on to avoid facing the full force of the climate concerns and will probably not be a viable option," said Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, a nonprofit environmental organization.

The coal industry shot back, accusing Brown of exaggerating coal's contribution to climate change and ignoring the economic necessity of power generation.

"This is part of a concerted effort to grossly exaggerate opposition to coal-based electricity generation," said Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association (NMA), which groups together coal and other mining companies.

"The NGO's (nongovernmental organizations) are on a jihad, exaggerating anecdotal evidence to conclude that coal is on the way out. Demand for coal in the world, let alone the United States, continues to set records, despite what they say.

"Affordable power is critical for the U.S. economy," said Popovich. According to NMA figures, U.S. electricity utilities consumed 1.05 billion tons of coal last year, up from 859.3 million tons in 2000.

"KISS OF DEATH"

Brown noted that a Department of Energy report last year listed 151 coal-fired power plants in the planning stages and talked about "a resurgence in coal-fired electricity."

But during 2007, 59 of those proposed plants were either refused licenses by state governments or quietly abandoned. Almost 50 more are being contested in the courts, and the remaining plants will likely be challenged as they reach the permitting stage, he said.

"The public at large is turning against coal," he said, citing a 2007 national poll by the Opinion Research Corp in which only 3 percent of people chose coal as their preferred source for electricity.

Legislators in Texas and Florida have refused to license new coal-fired plants, and last August coal "took a heavy political hit" when U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said he was against building coal-fired power plants anywhere in the world.

Coal's future is also suffering as Wall Street turns its back on the industry, Brown said. Citigroup and Merrill Lynch have both downgraded coal company stocks across the board.

This month, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America said lending for coal-fired power plants will be contingent on utilities demonstrating they would be economically viable under future federal rules on emissions.

"This appears to be the kiss of death for the industry," Brown said, especially if a national moratorium on coal-fired plants is passed by Congress.

Asked by Reuters what the U.S. should do with its vast coal reserves, given the growing demand for electricity, Brown said: "I'm in favor of leaving it right where it is."

And he dismissed coal-to-liquid technology, in which coal can be converted into vehicle fuels, as "too carbon-intensive."

"The cheapest alternative is investing in efficiency," he said, claiming that if the U.S. shifted to long-life compact florescent light bulbs, it would save enough power to close 80 coal-fired power plants.

(Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 15 Feb 08


Shorebirds of Singapore
the most numerous birds in Singapore and other fascinating details in a special article for International Year of the Reef on the budak blog

A new Plover for Singapore and Malaysia?
on the bird ecology blog

Hermit crabs
by a young blogger inspired by Uncle Joe, with a poll about shell collecting! on the natural sea blog

Two young writers share about the shores
on the flying fish friends blog

Insensitivity towards Ah Meng
from Singaporean Attitudes to Biological Conservation

Eco-driving
how to reduce the CO2 even with a conventional car on the reuters environment blog

Nobody loves invertebrates
Invertebrates are the big losers in the palm oil gold rush, on the journal watch online blog


Read more!

Making Singapore a test bed for products of the future

EDB's plan involves developing ideas in areas like health care, urban living
Nicholas Fang, Business Times 15 Feb 08;

THE long-running programme to entice overseas businesses to locate their regional bases in Singapore is receiving a strategic boost.

A new initiative developed by the Economic Development Board (EDB) builds on the work of the past 20 years but encompasses an approach that could bring double the benefits.

Called Future.Singapore, it will focus on business themes in which Singapore is seeking solutions, allowing the country itself to be used as a working model and test bed.

This added benefit will come on top of the traditional foreign investment flows into the country, said EDB chairman Lim Siong Guan.

He identified three new business themes under the new initiative: urban solutions; wellness, ageing and health care; and lifestyle products and services.

Mr Lim said in an interview yesterday that the initiative's tagline would be: The Future In Singapore - Singapore In The Future.

'We will seek to produce new products and services that the world will want in the future which are first produced here, hence, The Future In Singapore.

'We will also develop and test new ideas where we will be at the forefront in the use of technology for urban liveability, health care and quality living, which is where Singapore In The Future comes in.'

The EDB's assistant managing director for industry development, Ms Aw Kah Peng, said the three business themes were identified after wider global trends were analysed.

'There are certain mega trends that are affecting the world and Singapore, and we are looking at how these work and how we can benefit from them,' she said.

Mr Lim said this contrasted with the EDB's earlier strategy of focusing on attracting businesses that could be grouped into clusters according to industry.

'That was more supply-driven, where we would look at what businesses companies were engaged in, and then create an attractive and conducive environment for them here in Singapore,' he said.

'While we will continue to do that, we are now also looking at what is being demanded by the marketplace and seeing how we can develop solutions here.'

The new industries the EDB is hoping to develop under the latest initiative range across a wide spectrum. They include clean water and energy; waste management; urban planning; wellness and health services; products for an ageing population; and business opportunities targeting the rising middle class in Singapore and in the region.

Mr Lim said foreign companies would not consider investing in Singapore in these sectors unless there were competent local companies already operating.

'A good example is clean water. We started Newater to meet a need for supplies of clean water in Singapore, and now it has become a draw for a high level of research and development activities in that field here,' he said.

The new sectors are also expected to appeal to young Singaporeans looking for exciting careers.

'Many young people are passionate about issues such as clean energy, or are interested in products such as interactive games,' said Mr Lim.

EDB assistant managing director Kenneth Tan, who heads the board's New Business Group, said the EDB itself had received strong responses from prospective employees.

'There have been many people applying at the EDB for jobs that deal specifically with the business sectors under the new initiative, such as urban solutions,' he said.

Mr Lim said it is an encouraging sign that the EDB is targeting industries that will have a wide appeal for Singaporeans looking for jobs, as this is a key objective for the board when bringing in foreign investment projects.


Read more!

Singapore: Venice of the East?

Make use of our waterways to ease transport woes
Letter from Kenneth Ong Hin Leong, Today Online 15 Feb 08;

THERE has been much discussion on improving Singapore's public transport recently, culminating with the announcement that the electronic road-pricing network will be widened.

I would like Transport Minister Raymond Lim to revisit the idea of moving people via the waterways, instead of just increasing the number of buses and trains, and extending the MRT lines.

Shenton Way and the soon to be built Marina Bay financial centre are all located close to a pier or the sea. The Singapore River also runs along several areas where population density is quite heavy.

Since the infrastructure is already available, why not encourage Singaporeans to travel by boat from the east to the Central Business District (CBD)?

We have the Bedok and Tanah Merah jetties with ample car parks nearby. They can be used to service residents in Marine Parade, Siglap, Bedok, Pasir Ris and Tampines.

We can also build jetties in the Kallang area, not to mention possibility of including new piers in the development plans for Ponggol, where water is featured prominently.

We can also integrate the MRT trains and buses to the jetties such that switching between the different modes of transport would be seamless.

If the idea does take root, it would make Singapore quite a place to live in, a la Venice of the East, perhaps?


Read more!

No Pristine Oceans Left, New Map Shows

Coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangroves, rocky reefs and shelves are among the most seriously altered ecosystems.



Mason Inman, National Geographic News 14 Feb 08;

No areas of the world's oceans remain completely untouched by humanity's influence, according to a new study.

Every area of the oceans is feeling the effects of fishing, pollution, or human-caused global warming, the study says, and some regions are being affected by all of these factors and more.

A team led by Ben Halpern of the University of California, Santa Barbara, created the first global map that shows the various kinds of damage being done to marine ecosystems.

The team assigned scores to 17 human impacts and tallied them up for every ocean region to reveal the overall effect people are having on marine life.

"The ocean is so big, I figured there would be a lot of areas that we hadn't gotten to or that people rarely get to," Halpern said.

"But when you look at the map, there are huge areas that are being impacted by multiple human activities," he said. "It was certainly a surprise to me."

The project revealed that more than 40 percent of the world's marine ecosystems are heavily affected.

Major hot spots include the North Sea off the northern coast of Europe and Asia's South China Sea and East China Sea.

The study will be published tomorrow in the journal Science.

Acid Oceans, Melting ice

Of all the human effects on marine ecosystems, climate change is having by far the largest overall impact, the researchers estimate.

Greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide are warming up the atmosphere and, more slowly, the oceans, the scientists explain.

Also, carbon dioxide dissolves into ocean waters, turning them more acidic, which makes it harder for corals, shellfish, and other animals to grow their protective skeletons or shells.

Remote, ice-bound areas in Antarctica and the Arctic are feeling the least impact, the study found, mostly because few people live there and those regions are hard to reach.

But global warming is still affecting those places.

The impacts of warming will continue to get worse, the study notes.

"Projections of future polar ice loss suggest that the impact on these regions will increase substantially," the study authors write.

The second biggest factor affecting marine life is fishing, they add.

Trawl-fishing for animals on the ocean floor, such as groundfish and shrimp, is especially damaging because the rest of the seafloor habitat is destroyed in the process, Halpern says.

The habitats that are suffering the worst impacts, rated "very high" in the study, are continental shelves, the shallow areas off the coasts of continents that are 200 to 750 feet (60 to 200 meters) deep.

Other areas with very high impacts include the northeastern U.S., where pollution, commercial shipping, and fishing are the major causes of harm.

The North Sea and Chinese coasts are hit by almost every kind of impact, Halpern said.

"It's a perfect storm."

Marine Parks

Elizabeth Babcock is a marine biologist at the University of Miami who was not involved in the new study.

"The most useful thing about this [study] is the ability to look at the big picture and to pick out areas that are particularly pristine that would be good places for having marine parks," she said.

The research could also be used to find "areas that are a lot more impacted than anyone thinks, that really need some conservation attention," she added.

"The map is useful for international groups to prioritize where they spend money for mitigation [of these problems] and conservation."

John Pandolfi of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, said the study "highlights the fact that ecosystems in the sea know no political boundaries. Hence an international, cooperative approach is the only way forward."

The team did not measure the effects of certain practices, such as illegal fishing and aquaculture, the farming of aquatic plants and animals.

"This makes their estimates of habitat decline conservative, and things are probably worse than they outline," Pandolfi said.

Including more local impacts would also paint a bleaker picture, he added.

"A closer look at the nearshore human footprints will probably show a greater degree of degradation," he said.

Yet Halpern remains optimistic.

"My hope is that our results serve as a wake-up call to better manage and protect our oceans rather than a reason to give up," he said.

"Our goal, and really our necessity, is to do this in a sustainable way so that our oceans remain in a healthy state and continue to provide us the resources we need and want."

Man's affect on world's oceans revealed
Nic Fleming, The Telegraph 14 Feb 08;

Almost half of the world's oceans have been seriously affected by over-fishing, pollution and climate change, according to a major study of Man's impact on marine life.

An international team of 19 scientists have published the first ever comprehensive map showing the combined impact of human activity on the planet's seas and oceans.

It shows that more than 40 per cent of marine regions have been significantly altered, while just four per cent remains in a pristine state.

Previous studies have largely focused on the impacts of specific activities such as pesticide runoff or fishing, or have looked at damage in certain areas.

The North Sea is one of the most heavily affected regions, along with the South and East China Seas, the Caribbean, the east coast of North America, the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. The least affected areas are near the poles.

Dr Ben Halpern, of the University of California, presented the new findings at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference in Boston.

Dr Halpern said: "This project allows us to finally start to see the big picture of how humans are affecting the oceans.

"The big picture looks much worse than I imagine most people expected. It was certainly a surprise to me."

Activities and impacts included in the study include fishing, ocean acidification caused by pollution, temperature change, species extinctions and invasions, and the shipping, oil and gas industries.

The researchers developed models to quantify and compare how 17 human activities affected marine ecosystems.

For example fertiliser runoff has been shown to cause significant damage to coral reefs but has less effect on kelp forests.

They gathered data from across the world and collated the results to give each area a score for man-made damage and changes.

The results, published in the journal Science, show that 41 per cent of the world's oceans and seas have been significantly affected by multiple human activities.

Coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangroves, rocky reefs and shelves are among the most seriously altered ecosystems.


Map shows toll on world's oceans
By Helen Briggs, BBC News 14 Feb 08;

Only about 4% of the world's oceans remain undamaged by human activity, according to the first detailed global map of human impacts on the seas.

A study in Science journal says climate change, fishing, pollution and other human factors have exacted a heavy toll on almost half of the marine waters.

Only remote icy areas near the poles are relatively pristine, but they face threats as ice sheets melt, it warns.

The authors say the data is a "wake-up call" to policymakers.

Lead scientist, Dr Benjamin Halpern, of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara, US, said humans were having a major impact on the oceans and the marine ecosystems within them.

"In the past, many studies have shown the impact of individual activities," he said. "But here for the first time we have produced a global map of all of these different activities layered on top of each other so that we can get this big picture of the overall impact that humans are having rather than just single impacts."

Co-author Dr Mark Spalding told BBC News that the map was the first attempt to describe and quantify the combined threats facing the world's oceans from human factors, ranging from commercial shipping to over-fishing.

"There's an element of wake-up call when you get maps like this," he said. "Human threats are all pervasive across the world's oceans.

"The map is an impetus for action, I think that it is a real signal to roll up our sleeves and start managing our coast and oceans."

Complex model

The international team of 20 scientists in the US, Canada and UK built a complex model to handle large amounts of information on 17 different human threats.

The researchers divided the world's oceans into 1km-square sections and examined all real data available on how humankind is influencing the marine environment.

They then calculated "human impact scores" for each location, presenting this as a global map of the toll people have exacted on the seas.

The scientists say they were shocked by the findings.

"I think the big surprise from all of this was seeing what the complete coverage of human impacts was," said Dr Spalding, senior marine scientist at The Nature Conservancy, a conservation group in Newmarket, UK. "There's nowhere really that escaped. It's quite a shocking map to see."

He said the two biggest drivers in destroying marine habitats were climate change and over-fishing.

"Out on the high seas, climate change and fishing were far and away the strongest influences," he explained. "The least impacted areas are the polar regions but they are not untouched."

Clear message

The scientists hope the map will be used to prioritise marine conservation efforts.

Andrew Rosenberg, a professor of natural resources at the University of New Hampshire, US, who was not part of the study, said policymakers could no longer focus on fishing or pollution as if they were separate effects.

"These human impacts overlap in space and time, and in far too many cases the magnitude is frighteningly high," he said.

"The message for policymakers seems clear to me: conservation action that cuts across the whole set of human impacts is needed now in many places around the globe."

The findings of the study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Boston, US.

Oceans 40% Fouled By Pollution, Fishing, Warming, Study Says
Alex Morales, Bloomberg.com 14 Feb 08;

Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Fishing, pollution and climate change damaged more than two-fifths of the world's oceans, said scientists who produced a map of the human toll on marine life.

Every single square kilometer of the oceans is affected by something man-made, and 41 percent has a "medium high" or "high" impact, the scientists, led by Ben Halpern at the University of California, Santa Barbara, said in an article to be published in the journal Science Feb. 15.

The researchers examined 17 ways that humans affect oceans, including shipping lanes, oil and gas exploration, and invasive species, and mapped the effects across coral reefs, mangroves and continental shelves. The map will help world policymakers protect the oceans, Halpern said in a telephone interview.

"A lot of the past studies have looked at just a single activity -- fishing or climate change or land-based runoff pollution, and they looked at the impact of just one of those," Halpern said yesterday. "We've looked at the overlaying cumulative sum of all of these activities at once, so you can really get a big picture of how humans are affecting the oceans."

Oceans near the poles were unaffected by humans. The North Sea and the South and East China Seas were heavily impacted, said Halpern. The Mediterranean, east Caribbean, Persian Gulf, Norwegian Sea, Bering Sea, the east coast of North America and the waters around Sri Lanka were also among the worst, the article said.

`Degraded State'

"Those areas are definitely in a degraded state, and a state that if people went diving in, probably would not be too happy to be in," Halpern said.

Reefs and mangroves, coastal habitats that receive a lot of attention from conservationists, were heavily damaged by human activities, the study said. Worst were rocky reefs and continental shelves, where commercial fishing concentrates, Halpern said.

"Where you're in a very high impact situation, it's fairly heavily degraded, and the ecosystem is probably not something people would even recognize as a normal healthy ecosystem," Halpern said. "It probably means that most of the big fish and invertebrates are gone and that the plants and animals that live on the bottom are much less abundant than they used to be."

Climate change had the biggest impact on oceans, raising temperature, acid levels and ultraviolet radiation, Halpern said.

Worse Picture

"In coastal areas, you get everything from land-based pollution, and oil and gas development, invasive species as well as climate change and fishing causing problems," he said.

The map created by the scientists doesn't include fish farming or sediment runoff from dammed rivers, said Halpern, who said the group's estimates were conservative.

"There are going to be interactions among these different activities that makes the whole much greater than the parts," Halpern said. "The picture would probably look worse if you accounted for these interactions."

Effective ocean-management can stop the degradation, the study said. Climate change likely will intensify the damage, according to the scientists.

Policy makers should use the scientists' map to separate harmful ocean activities, so negative effects aren't magnified, Halpern said.

"We have business districts and residential districts, schools and churches. All these things are zoned into different places to create some cohesion to our communities that make sense. You don't have a strip club next to a school," the researcher said. "We can allow all these activities to go on, but just not in the same place."


Read more!

Turks and Caicos Islands marine national park damaged by building of a resort

Gemma Handy, The Telegraph 13 Feb 08;

One of the world's most famous coral reefs is being put at risk by work to develop a luxury resort in the heart of a Caribbean national park, local campaigners claim.

The beautiful Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI), long a haven for scuba divers, are one of the UK's remaining 14 Overseas Territories.

British residents living on the island of Providenciales have lodged an official complaint with the Foreign Affairs Select Committee saying the mammoth scheme could spell disaster for the fragile ecosystem.

For centuries the reef, one of the globe's top dive sites, has been a haven for indigenous wildlife such as turtles, shrimp, conch and lobster.

The development, which includes a Miami-style Nikki Beach resort, condominiums and yacht club, involves dredging thousands of tonnes of sand from the sea-bed to allow 200ft-long vessels to pass through.

The work is destroying the habitat for myriad seabed marine life, it is alleged, and causing silt to settle on the coral and smother it.

Divers claim parts of the ocean floor now look more like a building site than a valuable and protected ecosystem.

Local tour operators say they fear for their livelihoods while people living nearby say they have suffered with noise and dust since the project began last autumn.

Jay Stubbs has been leading sailing and snorkelling excursions in the area, known locally as Leeward Going Through, for more than 12 years with his company Sail Provo.

"There are places we used to take guests snorkelling which we can't go to any more because of the damage the silt has done to the reef," he said.

"Sediment is also building up along the mangroves making the water shallower and taking away shelter for the small, juvenile fish forcing them to relocate.

"Just last year you could see the bottom, now it's so murky even the turtles can't find their way down; we have noticed a lot more of them floating around on the surface."

A number of local tour operators' premises along with a restaurant were bulldozed last year to make way for the scheme.

"It's changing the face of the whole place," Mr Stubbs said. "Leeward Going Through has been used by boaters for generations. Now it's infringing on our livelihoods.

"When people start privatising the waterways they can assert any legal rights they like on it. All it will take is one or two complaints from high end guests about the noise from boats for them to stop us coming through.

"If that happens, how will freighters get food and cargo to the other islands? This is the main route for everyone."

Philip Shearer, of Big Blue, said: "As a seasoned diver I have seen a marked drop and decline in the quality of coral all over Grace Bay. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see dredging is the problem.

"It is moving all the turtle grass which holds sediment at the bottom. These guys are creating a whole bunch of sediment in suspension which clogs up the reef.

"It's a major problem and sets a bad precedent if a development like that can go ahead without taking into account the full environmental impact."

Meanwhile, residents say they are being kept awake by horrendous noise. "Sometimes the sand moving trucks never stop the entire night. We can hear honking, beeping, hauling and gunning engines," one Islander claimed.

"This is not the usual 4.30am to midnight. This is going on all night."

He also expressed grave concern about the huge mountain of dredged sand at nearby Emerald Point estimated to be around 50 metres long, 200 metres wide and 15 metres high.

"The pile could be twice as high in a few months; if there was a hurricane it would be a disaster. This development is right on the edge of the Princess Alexandra National Park which has always been quite aggressively protected.

"None of us can begin to comprehend how anyone can have got permission to do anything on a coral reef. It will kill it," he added.

A spokesman for the TCI's Department of Environment and Coastal Resources (DECR) said the dredging was being monitored daily by a construction group working on behalf of the planning department and the DECR.

"Reports are regularly submitted to our office and if we see a problem the dredging is stopped while the problem is corrected," he said.

"We are in winter so a lot of sediment is being moved around even without the dredging. There will be some effects from the development but to say the dredging is the sole cause of the damage would be incorrect."

Leeward Marina Resort developer Rodney Propps, business partner of Conservative peer Lord Ashcroft, said the company had carried out a number of environmental impact studies.

"Everything we are doing we have a licence and planning permission for and all works are to international standards. We are opening the country's first mega-yacht club and that is why the Government is completely behind us.

"The noise will be finished shortly. I doubt the residents who complained are the same ones who are aware that their properties have increased in value by 400 per cent since we started."

Mr Propps said just one-sixth of the dredged sand would be sold for which the company was paying an undisclosed royalty to the Crown. The remaining sand will be used to replenish local beaches.

Silt is one of the biggest killers of coral reefs worldwide. The reason it is so destructive is because it blocks light which coral depends on to live.

Home to more life forms than any other ocean environment, coral reefs comprise the oldest and most complex ecosystems on Earth. They have existed for more than 200m years while their current level of biodiversity dates back 50m years.

In addition to pollution, a decline in water quality, overfishing and climate change are some of the biggest challenges facing these ancient sanctuaries.

Just this week, the TCI Government declared 2008 to be the Year of the Coral Reef. One can only hope this will herald protection for the reef and the marine life which depend on its survival.


Read more!

Study of ocean life shows a "chaotic" balance of nature

Tom Spears , The Ottawa Citizen 13 Feb 08;

An eight-year study of ocean life shows a "chaotic" balance of nature, and Dutch scientists say this chaos makes it impossible to predict the rise and fall of wild species - anywhere, ever.

Ecologists and politicians often want computers to show how nature will react if we bulldoze a forest or change the global temperature, but the Baltic Sea study now argues this kind of modeling may not be worth much.

If so, it raises doubts about how we can ever preserve a healthy environment, except through good luck.

The small Baltic creatures such as plankton were isolated from the rest of the ocean and studied for eight years. Each member of the "food web," or network of who eats whom, took turns multiplying and becoming scarce, even though the scientists kept the outside conditions constant.

And they could never figure out a pattern that allowed real predictions of how any species would fare.

"Advanced mathematical techniques proved the indisputable presence of chaos in this food web," they conclude in the journal Nature," adding that "short-term prediction is possible, but long-term prediction is not."

Lead scientist Jef Huisman said it's like trying to forecast the long-term weather: all their forecasts broke down beyond a few weeks.

This is already causing a stir in some biology circles. At Duke University in North Carolina, Stuart Pimm called the work "an outstanding job" and said it raises the possibility that nature just can't be crammed into computer models.

But he adds: "In an important way it's even more interesting than that.

"One of the classic chaotic systems is the weather," he said. "We have computer models that do a good job of predicting the weather in the short term."

But the best supercomputers can't stretch that forecast beyond a week or 10 days, echoing the Baltic Sea models that failed.

"It's the way in which they fail that's interesting," Mr. Pimm says. "They fail spectacularly badly over longer and longer periods of time."

Beyond that short-term forecast, "you simply can't do better than treating it as a game of chance," he says. Past that short-term run of accuracy, the errors shoot up exponentially.

This, he says, is what the Baltic Sea experiment found - but in populations of sea creatures, not in the weather.

"The mark of chaotic systems is not that they're unpredictable (i.e. all the time). It's that in the short term you can predict them really well, but the system deviates from your prediction and deviates ... exponentially. So you start out with a tiny error, and the next day that error doubles, and then doubles again and doubles again so eventually you've got no prediction whatsoever. And that fingerprint of chaos is at the heart of this (Baltic Sea) paper.

"They're not saying, 'Aw, it's really hard to predict plankton systems.' They're finding that after the short-term intervals ... the differences will blow up exponentially."

The question now is whether this chaos will show up in populations of all wildlife from giraffes to bald eagles to crocodiles.

"That's the big question," Mr. Pimm says. "We just don't know," but this research is step one in finding out. "It alerts us to the notion that there may be a lot more stuff like this out there."


Read more!

Ocean advocates hopeful WTO cut in fishing support

Missy Ryan, Reuters 14 Feb 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Supporters of action to protect the world's fragile fish stocks are hoping that a recent proposal to drastically limit fishing subsidies will prevail in global trade talks.

"We are in such dire conditions," said Courtney Sakai, campaign director for Oceana, an environmental group that vocally opposed subsidies for boat-building, fuel and other activities they say have pushed fisheries close to exhaustion.

Critics of those subsidies, which total about $20 billion a year globally, hope that a long-awaited agreement in the World Trade Organization's Doha round will force countries like Japan to scale back payments.

"There really needs to be a reduction in these subsidies that encourage overfishing," Sakai said.

Ocean activists say that overfishing and habitat destruction could collapse the world's fish and seafood populations by 2048.

According to the United Nations, 52 percent of marine fish stocks are at or near the maximum sustainable output levels, and almost 20 percent are over-exploited.

The United States is also hoping the Doha round, which negotiators are angling to conclude this year, will be a vehicle for new restrictions.

Last year, the Bush administration called in the talks for a blanket ban on subsidies for wild-capture fishing.

Its WTO plan would have provided some exceptions for subsidies that do not encourage overfishing, such as boat buybacks, stock enhancement, or research programs.

But the latest WTO draft on issue, which was released in November, takes a different approach, prohibiting a list of subsidies that encourage over-fishing, such as vessel construction or repair or for fleet operation.

It would provide more berth for other subsidies, and would give more leeway to developing countries, where the poor may rely on fishing for their livelihoods. Those countries would be required to produce conservation plans.

Even so, said Gretchen Hamel, a spokeswoman for Trade Representative Susan Schwab, the WTO outline "sets a high level of ambition that we are pleased with, and we will work hard to make sure that it is not whittled away."

The United States does not provide the kind of subsidies targeted by ocean activists.

This week, Schwab met actor Ted Danson, who is campaigning with Oceana to raise the issue's profile in Washington. "We are on the brink of an irreversible collapse," Danson said in a speech the National Press Club.

Opposition remains to the reductions, especially from several countries with major fishing industries.

Sakai described the position of the European Union, which includes countries with active fishing industries, as "not particularly constructive."

Negotiations on fishing subsidies are one small slice of the massive and contentious agenda of the Doha round, which has been proceeding at a glacial pace since they began in 2001.

Even if consensus is secured on the fishing proposal, the rules would not become binding unless an overall Doha agreement can finally be had.

The Bush administration is hoping for a breakthrough on the round's main areas -- agriculture, industry, and services -- in the next month or two, which would allow enough time to finish talks on other issues, like fishing subsidies, before President George W. Bush leaves office.

According to the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization, China, Peru and the United States were the world's top fish producers in 2004.

At the end of that year, the world fishing fleet included about 4 million vessels, with the lion's share in Asia.

On China, Sakai said, a key concern is to "craft rules that ensure that it cannot use developing country treatment as a loophole to subsidize its massive, global fishing activity."

(Editing by Russell Blinch and Marguerita Choy)


Read more!

Seahorse numbers around Britain increasing

Stuart Coles, The Telegraph 14 Feb 08;

It may come as a surprise to most people that there are any seahorses at all in British coastal waters, and more surprising still that numbers appear to be increasing.

Seahorse experts met in London this month to discuss the apparent population surge in seahorses and their close relative, the pipefish.

The reasons for this increase, described as "rapid and dramatic" is not yet clear and a number of theories have been put forward including a natural population boom or warmer waters.

As with any shift in population, it is also having a knock-on effect upon other species, including sea birds.

Pipefish form a distinct family with seahorses (syngnathids) and as the name would suggest, look like straight-bodied seahorses with tiny mouths.

Numbers of the snake pipefish, once rarely seen in northern British waters, now often end up in the region's trawler nets in vast numbers, say scientists.

Once associated with deep northern waters, they have even been found recently further south by fishermen in the Thames Estuary.

A European team led by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) says that the numbers of snake pipefish in British waters has increased more than one hundredfold since 2003.

They say although there have been changes in water temperature in the North Sea since around 1988, the large numbers of snake pipefish have only appeared in the last four or five years - putting a global warming theory in doubt.

"There is no doubt that numbers of snake pipefish have increased. In the last few years they are just everywhere," said Professor Mike P Harris of CEH.

"Although climate change may well have had an effect, the jury is, we think, still out on this matter."

Cindy van Damme of the Netherlands' Wageningen IMARES - the Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies, believes she may be nearer an answer.

She says recent shifts in ocean currents have led to a change in the composition of plankton - it has shrunk.

"Plankton is the major food item of pipefish and sea horses. The mouth opening of this group of fishes restricts the prey size they can handle. We think this mechanism explains the huge increase of snake pipefish. Hence this outbreak may very well last for only a limited number of years."

However long it lasts, it is impacting startlingly upon pipefish predators - which include everything from mackerel, dolphins, otters and sharks to seabirds.

Although they are eaten by birds such as gannets, kittiwakes and puffins, their spiny, 'armoured' forms, like seahorses make them difficult for young birds to swallow and digest - some young birds even choke to death on them.

In fact, their nutritional value for birds is in doubt - and their explosion in numbers seems to be linked with poor breeding seasons.

Scientists are also recording birds with large numbers of uneaten pipefish, with nests actually made of the fish. They say the pipefish appear to be a poor substitute for their normal food such as sand eels.

The explanation for increased sightings of seahorses in many place on Britain's coastline, and at vastly varying depths, may be a little more straightforward.

Neil Garrick-Maidment, Director of the UK's Seahorse Trust, doubts global warming has anything to do with it. "There's no evidence at all, as far as I can see. It's just people jumping on the bandwagon."

He says seahorses were first recorded in British waters in the 1880s and even appear in early Pictish art.

The increase is sightings is due to the Trust's British Seahorse Survey, better awareness, shifting currents and the role of the internet, says Mr Garrick-Maidment.

"There are simply more people out there looking, that's the reason we have so many sightings," he says, adding that better relationships with fishermen have added to data coming in to the Survey which was started in 1994.

"They were reluctant at first, as they didn't always want to reveal where they were fishing, but we've cracked that."

The survey has eight co-ordinators and receives frequent emailed sightings, reports and photographs from members of the public, agencies and even power stations - whose warm waters and filters are thought to attract seahorses.

Britain's changing Gulf Stream also plays a role, he says. "It's hard trying to even convince people that there are seahorses in our waters - they usually think they are tropical creatures. But the Gulf Stream is a major influence on species, we have basking sharks, turtles and all manner of jellyfish - lots of creatures people think are tropical."

Besides, he says, half of the world's seahorse species live in cold or temperate waters. If global warming does turn out to playing a role he says he "will be the first to admit I'm wrong - but I just don't see it."

Mr Garrick-Maidmen, who founded the world's first seahorse aquarium (in Exeter) and has spent 28 years studying and breeding them, clearly has not lost his great enthusiasm.

"They are fascinating, magical creatures. We have only just scratched the surface of what we know, there's an awful lot of work to do. Hence the Survey will be going on for a long time yet."


Read more!

Shoppers Fret More Over Food Packaging Waste - Poll

PlanetArk 15 Feb 08;

OSLO - Wasteful food packaging is among the fastest-growing environmental concerns for shoppers worldwide with New Zealanders most willing to cut back, a poll showed on Thursday.

The Internet-based survey in 48 nations, by the Nielsen Company, indicated that 40 percent of respondents were "very concerned" by trash from food packaging in November 2007 against just 31 percent in the previous poll in May 2007.

"Concern for packaging waste increased more than any other environmental concern," Nielsen said of the replies by 25,000 people. The survey also probed attitudes to climate change, water shortages, air and water pollution and use of pesticides.

"While eco-friendly packaging might not be the top priority for shoppers today, it's certainly a growing priority the food industry cannot ignore," said Patrick Dodd, president of the Nielsen Company, Europe.

Retailers such as Wal-Mart, Carrefour or Tesco are all pushing to cut back.

Half of those surveyed expressed willingness to give up "convenience packaging" -- for instance boxes to help make food more easily stacked or transported, re-sealable containers or plastic packages also used during cooking.

But only about 30 percent would abandon packaging meant to keep food clean, untouched by other shoppers or, for instance, labels with instructions for cooking and use.

The survey showed that New Zealanders were most willing to cut back, with more than 65 percent willing to forego convenience packaging. People in Finland, Ireland, the Czech Republic and Norway were also among those most willing to cut.

At the other end of the scale, people in Thailand and Japan were least willing to give up any kind of packaging.

Nielsen said urban shoppers in Asia often bought fresh food from markets and did not buy supermarket food packed for a long shelf life. They often prized aesthetics or easily stored goods.

Europeans and North Americans were those least prepared to give up packaging meant to ensure hygiene.

Overall, Nielsen said consumers were shifting to demand paper, cardboard or glass, all of which can be recycled, rather than plastic or polystyrene.

Bernard Leveau of packaging specialists Multivac in France said there were many ways of simplifying packaging. The firm had cut the thickness of plastic film used in food packaging by 30-35 percent while keeping the same strength, he said.

He also said retailers in the 1980s strived to extend the shelf life of fresh food -- such as up to three weeks for meat -- demanding complex packaging. "We're noticing that a shelf life of eight or 10 days is generally enough," he told Reuters.

Among other shifts, biodegradable materials for packaging could replace plastics and canned foods could often be sold in far less heavy containers.

-- For Reuters latest environment blogs go to: http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/

(Editing by Elizabeth Piper)


Read more!

Oceans eyed as new energy source

Brian Skoloff, Associated Press Yahoo News 15 Feb 08;

Just 15 miles off Florida's coast, the world's most powerful sustained ocean current — the mighty Gulf Stream — rushes by at nearly 8.5 billion gallons per second. And it never stops.

To scientists, it represents a tantalizing possibility: a new, plentiful and uninterrupted source of clean energy.

Florida Atlantic University researchers say the current could someday be used to drive thousands of underwater turbines, produce as much energy as perhaps 10 nuclear plants and supply one-third of Florida's electricity. A small test turbine is expected to be installed within months.

"We can produce power 24/7," said Frederick Driscoll, director of the university's Center of Excellence in Ocean Energy Technology. Using a $5 million research grant from the state, the university is working to develop the technology in hopes that big energy and engineering companies will eventually build huge underwater arrays of turbines.

From Oregon to Maine, Europe to Australia and beyond, researchers are looking to the sea — currents, tides and waves — for its infinite energy. So far, there are no commercial-scale projects in the U.S. delivering electricity to the grid.

Because the technology is still taking shape, it is too soon to say how much it might cost. But researchers hope to make it as cost-effective as fossil fuels. While the initial investment may be higher, the currents that drive the machinery are free.

There are still many unknowns and risks. One fear is the "Cuisinart effect": The spinning underwater blades could chop up fish and other creatures.

Researchers said the underwater turbines would pose little risk to passing ships. The equipment would be moored to the ocean floor, with the tops of the blades spinning 30 to 40 feet below the surface, because that's where the Gulf Stream flows fastest. But standard navigation equipment on ocean vessels could easily guide them around the turbine fields if their hulls reached that deep, researchers said.

And unlike offshore wind turbines, which have run into opposition from environmentalists worried that the technology would spoil the ocean view, the machinery would be invisible from the surface, with only a few buoys marking the fields.

David White of the Ocean Conservancy said much of the technology is largely untested in the outdoors, so it is too soon to say what the environmental effects might be.

"We understand that there are environmental trade-offs, and we need to start looking to alternative energy and everything should be on the table," he said. "But what are the environmental consequences? We just don't know that yet."

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has issued 47 preliminary permits for ocean, wave and tidal energy projects, said spokeswoman Celeste Miller. Most such permits grant rights just to study an area's energy-producing potential, not to build anything.

The field has been dealt some setbacks. An ocean test last year ended in disaster when its $2 million buoy off Oregon's coast sank to the sea floor. Similarly, a small test project using turbines powered by tidal currents in New York City's East River ran into trouble last year after turbine blades broke.

The Gulf Stream is about 30 miles wide and shifts only slightly in its course, passing closer to Florida than to any other major land mass. "It's the best location in the world to harness ocean current power," Driscoll said.

Researchers on the West Coast, where the currents are not as powerful, are looking instead to waves to generate power.

Canada-based Finavera Renewables has received a FERC license to test a wave energy project in Washington state. It will eventually include four buoys in a bay and generate enough power for up to 700 homes. The 35-ton buoys rise above the water about 6 feet and extend some 60 feet down. Inside each buoy, a piston rises and falls with the waves.

The company hopes later to be the first in the U.S. to operate a commercial-scale "wave farm," situated off Northern California. The project with Pacific Gas and Electric calls for Finavera to produce enough electricity to power up to 600 homes by 2012. Finavera eventually wants to supply 30,000 households.

Roger Bedard of the Electric Power Research Institute said an analysis by his organization found that wave- and tide-generated energy could supply only about 6.5 percent of today's electricity needs.

Finavera spokesman Myke Clark acknowledged that wave energy is "definitely not the only answer" to the nation's power needs and is never going to be as cheap as coal. But it could be "part of the energy mix," and could be used to great advantage off the coasts of Third World countries, where entire towns have no connection to electrical grids, he said.

Nick Furman, executive director of the Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission, said he fears the wave technology could crowd out his industry, which last year brought in 50 million pounds of crab and contributed $150 million to the state's economy.

"We've got a limited amount of flat sandy bottom on the Oregon Coast where we can put out pots and where we can fish, and the wave energy folks are telling us they need the same flat, sandy bottom," Furman said.

"It's not the 10-buoy wave park that has the industry concerned. It's that if it's successful, then that park turns into a 200- or 400-buoy park and it just keeps growing."


Read more!

Energy Saving Most Effective In CO2 Cutting - Report

PlanetArk 15 Feb 08;

UNITED NATIONS - Squeezing more productivity out of the energy that industries, homes and vehicles burn is the most economical way to stifle rising energy demand and control output of planet-warming gases, according to a new report from the McKinsey Global Institute.

For decades, many countries have mostly invested in finding more supplies of oil, gas and coal to meet the rising energy needs of growing populations, but as energy costs and global warming concerns rise, interest in investing in ways to slow energy demand is beginning to take hold.

"We've identified huge opportunities to reduce energy demand and carbon emissions through improved efficiency," Diana Farrell, the director of the MGI, said in an interview.

Slowing global energy waste at industries like pulp and paper, oil refining and steel, homes and cars could more than halve global energy demand growth from current levels of 2.2 percent a year, according to the report, "The Case for Investing in Energy Productivity," released by the MGI on Thursday at a United Nations Investor Summit on Climate Risk.

Initial global investments would total about $170 billion per year. But they would pay for themselves through energy savings, with an average internal return rate of 17 percent, the report said.

Industries would need to invest about $83 billion per year, homes would need to invest about $40 billion and transport and commercial sectors will need to invest $25 billion and $22 billion a year, respectively.

Less burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas as a result of the efficiencies would cut greenhouse gas output, the report said.

Getting companies to change their energy habits, however, is no easy task.

"The vast majority of global executives say fixing global warming problems can boost profits," said Farrell. "But few are acting on the opportunities."

John Holdren, a climate expert at Harvard University, told investors efficiencies can be helpful in slowing global warming, but that much more needs to be done, such as developing new fuels and methods to bury carbon emissions, to stop catastrophic consequences such as flooding from rising seas.

"The low-hanging fruit is wonderful, but we need to reach higher still," he said.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Christian Wiessner)


Read more!

Swedish drivers face test of eco-credentials

Ilze Filks, Reuters 13 Feb 08;

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Swedish driving instructor Lars Rembjer has two words of advice for his pupils, the first in the world to have to prove they can be kind to the environment to get their licenses: think ahead.

Those words apply to the road, the potential consequences of climate change and the roughly 10 percent in savings on fuel achievable with simple care behind the wheel.

Sweden, the homeland of carmakers Volvo and Saab, began demanding ecodriving skills from those applying for a car license at the end of 2007. Truck and motorcycle drivers will face a similarly toughened test come April 1.

After five years of teaching environmentally friendly driving techniques at his Stockholm motor school, Rembjer was ready for this, as were his students.

His first ecodriving lesson is that the thinking ahead starts before the engine does.

"One doesn't have to start the engine immediately but (should) finish all the preparations first: Put a gear in, release the handbrake and perhaps have a look around you. Then you start the engine," Rembjer said as he guided a student through the early stages of a lesson in a biofuel Volvo.

Advance planning is also key once a driver hits the road.

Sweden, which has the most fuel-thirsty cars in the European Union, will announce its carbon dioxide reduction targets this autumn, environment ministry spokesman Tomas Uddin said.

Ecodriving may help slow a steady rise in carbon dioxide emissions from transport, which the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency says have been rising on the back of an advancing economy, despite a fall in overall output.

BUSINESSES KEEN

Rembjer's fuel-saving equation is simple: use the engine to slow the vehicle before hitting the brakes, drive in as high a gear as possible, try to avoid aggressive acceleration from a standing start and only overtake when necessary.

Countries all over Europe are showing an interest in following Sweden into this new world, according to Per-Olof Nilsson, an official at the Swedish Road Administration (Vagverket in Swedish), which devised the new driving test.

He said this is especially true of Netherlands and Finland, where ecodriving instruction was born more than 10 years ago.

"We're frontrunners," Nilsson said of Sweden's new test.

"It's much discussed all through Europe. We've taken part in several workshops all over (Europe) where we have discussed these questions, especially what is the best way to test this question and also the best way of teaching it."

He said ecodriving also has generated significant interest among transport companies, with many major firms already offering fuel-saving driving tips to their drivers.

"They can save lots of money by reducing emissions and we get a better environment at the same time," Nilsson said.

Rembjer, a driving instructor for 20 years, also cited compelling economic arguments for ecodriving.

"Ecodriving is the future because there are only winners. The environment benefits and your wallet benefits," he said.

"We have ecodriving courses for companies who send all their staff to us and save money. They see that it pays off. They see that in a year's time they have recovered the cost for the course and that they're starting to make money."

In five years teaching the method, Rembjer has met no opposition or reluctance from students, although other instructors and some parents have raised objections.

He said the parents usually come around once they hear about the benefits: about a tenth of those who had called to complain ended up taking an ecodriving course themselves.

Nilsson said given the Swedish Road Administration's portfolio of responsibilities, the addition of environmentally friendly driving made sense.

Student Sofia Lundstrom, 18, said Rembjer's tuition has made ecodriving natural for her.

"I've driven this way all the time so I don't really feel the difference," she said after a lesson.

Lundstrom said she was happy ecodriving had been added to the driving test since she is worried about the environment. Nor was she daunted about being scrutinized on her skills.

"It's deeply ingrained. For example, when I am with my parents and they drive, I ... tell them what they're doing wrong -- 'Now you're ruining the environment'," she said.

(Reporting by Ilze Filks, writing by Sarah Edmonds; Editing by Charles Dick)


Read more!

Shell sets out vision of energy future

Yahoo News 14 Feb 08;

Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell unveiled its vision of the world's future energy sources Thursday, suggesting two scenarios where policy either remains with individual countries or is decentralised to allow a reduction in energy consumption and carbon emissions.

In both cases, Shell envisaged gas and oil prices should reach a "plateau" at around 2015, but the main energy source will be provided by coal, which is "available, cheap" and requires simple technology, the company said.

The company's vice-president, Jeremy Bentham, outlined the possibilities in a report -- "Shell energy scenarios to 2050: an era of revolutionary change" -- to reporters in London Thursday.

The report said energy demands were growing at an unprecedented rate and conventional suppliers will have a job on their hands to keep pace. At the same time, "environmental stresses" are increasing, it added.

Against such a background, Shell outlined two scenarios for policymakers.

The first scenario it envisaged was business continuing as usual and energy policy remaining an issue for individual countries, with fears of slower economic growth dissuading policy-setters from investing in renewable energy sources.

In such circumstances, Shell said energy prices would be highly volatile and investment decisions difficult to predict.

For that reason, Shell said it favoured as a "blueprint" a second scenario: energy policy set by a number of different bodies, such as sub-state regions, municipal authorities, industry and non-government organisations.

Under this scheme, the carbon market will be well-developed, new laws will favour carbon capture schemes, "second generation" biofuel projects, the general public will modify their energy habits and prices will be more stable.

"Both scenarios are plausible," said Bentham.

The next five years are crucial because they "will set the framework for the investments of the next 15 years," Bentham said.


Read more!