Best of our wild blogs: 29 May 09


Job opportunity - TMSI, NUS: Outreach officer
deadline 04 Jul 2009 on ecotax

Solo at Changi
on the Psychedelic Nature blog

Of hermit and feather
on the wonderful creation blog

More on hornbills locking bills
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Crows robbing grains from lorry
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Creatures of the night
on talfryn.net

So many things to see at Kranji Reservoir Park!
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Mottephobia
on the Urban Forest blog

Putting garbage in the ocean on purpose?
on blogfish


Read more!

Unfair to compare disparity in fines: some lawyers say

For first-time offenders who feed monkeys
Andre Yeo, The New Paper 29 May 09;

FEED monkeys and you could be fined $3,000 - even if it's your first time.

Drink and drive, and if you're a first-time offender, you could be fined $1,000.

Why the disparity? Why is the seemingly lesser offence drawing a heavier fine?

Mr Wilson Choo, 53, wrote to The Straits Times Forum page on 15 May, pointing this out. He was referring to the recent case of a housewife, who was fined $3,000 for feeding sweets to monkeys at Old Upper Thomson Road last February.

But four of the five lawyers The New Paper spoke to said making such a comparison may be simplistic and unfair as the offences are different.

Feeding monkeys comes under the Parks & Trees Act with a maximum fine of $50,000 and a jail term of up to six months.

A first-time drink driver can be fined between $1,000 and $5,000 or be jailed up to six months. He would also be disqualified from driving all classes of vehicles for at least a year, which would mean he will have to re-take for his driver's licence.

But Mr Lim Kia Tong, 57, a lawyer for 29 years, said that under the Parks and Trees Act, the $50,000 fine for feeding monkeys is a maximum sum. Depending on the judge, a person can actually be fined only $1.

Mr Lim said that the range of punishment for each offence had already been legislated, taking into account factors like the harm the offence could cause to others.

He said it was up to the judge to exercise his discretion to impose the fine that fit the offence.

Referring to another monkey-feeding case, Appeals Judge V K Rajah had said there was a need to send a clear message that feeding monkeys increased the risk of them behaving aggressively. He also said the fines could go higher or lower, depending on the circumstances of each case.

Lawyer Dennis Singham also pointed out that a first-time drink driving offender who injures or kills someone would not be charged with drink driving, but with dangerous driving.

That offence carries stiffer penalties including a fine of up to $3,000, and a jail sentence of up to a year.

Repeat offenders can be fined up to $5,000 and also be jailed up to two years. Anyone convicted of causing death by dangerous driving could be jailed up to five years.

Too easy on drink drivers

Lawyer Gloria James, 41, however, felt that a driver who kills someone might get off lightly if charged with causing death through a negligent or rash act under Section 304A of the Penal Code.

She said the offender would usually get a fine of $6,000 to $10,000 and would be disqualified from driving for three to five years.

She added: 'Here, a life is lost because of the offender's negligence and a fine seems too lenient to compensate the family. Though the offender would also be slapped with a civil suit (fatal accident claim), this payout is usually by the insurance company and the punishment would appear to be too lenient.'

Mr Choo told The New Paper he wrote to the media as he felt the punishments for drink driving were not effective.

In his letter, he had suggested confiscating the driver's vehicle, imposing a fine 10 times the list price of the car involved in the offence, immediate jail time until the case was heard in court, and a life ban on driving.

He also suggested increasing the prison term to a minimum of five years.

He said: 'If a person can buy a car for $50,000, what's a $5,000 fine for a third offence? There are more drink drivers than people feeding monkeys, so they should get a heavier fine.'

When asked about the perceived disparity between the punishments for drink driving and feeding monkeys, and to comment on Mr Choo's suggestions, all the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) would say was that sentencing was a prerogative of the courts.

Said a spokesman: 'The maximum is set by Parliament. Within the range set out in a statute, the trial judge has a discretion.'

Lawyer Mark Goh, 42, however, suggested the law may have to be reviewed. A lawyer for 15 years, he said drink driving offences were common in court and the tariffs and fines were reviewed very frequently.

But the monkeys were a separate matter.

He said: 'The feeding monkey legislation may be an old piece of law and may not have been reviewed recently. This was probably a case which came up suddenly and AGC did not review it to see how it compares with other statutes.'

He said there could be instances where crimes were not only found in the Penal Code but in obscure or little-used acts like the Parks and Trees Act, which could contain legislation which are not in sync with modern times.

He added: 'This is quite normal and that is why we have reviews to update these odd pieces of legislation.'

DIFFERENCES IN FINES

FEEDING MONKEYS

# $3,000 fine (starting point)

# 154 fined in '08

# 31 fined, so far, this year

DRINK DRIVING

# $1,000 min fine

# 3,586 arrested in '08

# 1,141 caught so far, this year


Read more!

NEA getting tougher on litterbugs

Stiffer penalties and more enforcement in place; public campaign to get message across
Amresh Gunasingham, Straits Times 29 May 09;

ENFORCEMENT is being stepped up here to tackle the rising problem of litterbugs.

The National Environment Agency (NEA), in a drive to improve public cleanliness standards here, has increased the number of man hours dedicated to targeting littering 'hot spots' by 150 per cent.

The worst spots are shopping malls, bus interchanges and popular food centres.

With more eyes in search of offenders, a record 4,463 litterbugs were nabbed by NEA enforcement officers last month, 33 per cent higher than the average of 3,363 recorded for each of the first three months of this year.

Also introduced last month, fines for first-time offenders who failed to dispose of small items such as cigarette butts, sweet wrappers and parking coupon tabs in litter bins were increased to $300 - a rise of $100.

And repeat offenders now get harsher penalties. In addition to serving Corrective Work Orders (CWO), they can also be hit with fines of up to $5,000.

Under the CWO scheme, which was introduced in November 1992, littering offenders can be made to complete up to 12 hours picking up rubbish, with each session capped at three hours. These are normally held at parks, beaches, town centres, shopping malls and around HDB estates.

The revisions are the first made in the past decade.

An NEA spokesman said the majority of litterbugs are male smokers aged between 21 and 30 years. Of the number caught this year, 4.5 per cent - or 655 - were repeat offenders.

NEA is also tackling the litter issue through a public education campaign that targets schools, businesses, grassroots organisations and major outdoor events such as the National Day Parade.

The effort will be given a boost later this year when a new national cleanliness campaign is launched to promote a cleaner living environment.

But Mr Wilson Ang, founder of environmental group Eco Singapore, which promotes more sustainable lifestyles among youth here, feels harsher penalties for littering will bring about only 'short-term success'.

'As with any habit, it takes an individual time to change a personal habit,' he said.

He added that the key to bringing about change to this perennial problem starts in school: 'Education is the long-term strategy to groom Singapore into being a more socially gracious society.'

He said more people need to take ownership of their environment.

NEA said it was too early to judge whether the increase in fines last month has had the desired effect of cleaning up the mess.

'We believe that penalties such as fines are strong deterrents against littering and are still necessary against the minority who continue to litter,' the spokesman said.

But ultimately, it is personal responsibility that matters when it comes to keeping Singapore clean and litter free, she added.

Laws a must to curb littering: Expert
WHO adviser lauds Singapore's efforts but notes problems with smokers, foreign workers
Maria Almenoar, Straits Times 29 May 09;

SINGAPORE'S ongoing issue with litter was openly debated at a liveable cities forum hosted by Singapore's Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) yesterday.

The event, attended by 200 guests at the Suntec convention centre, was organised by the CLC as well as the Health Promotion Board and the National Environment Agency (NEA).

Dr Everold Hosein, senior communication adviser-consultant with the World Health Organisation (WHO), spoke on social change and community engagement for health and liveable cities.

He said education and persuasion alone are not enough when it comes to changing people's mindsets about health and cleanliness.

'Enforcement and coercion are key to getting people to be better behaved,' he said.

The question of Singapore's own battle with cleanliness was raised during Dr Hosein's talk. He said Singapore had done a 'spectacular job' in curbing the problem and said it was a good example for other cities.

'When you have 80per cent of your population following the rules and the country looks this clean, that is a good job,' he said.

But Singapore could still work on some 'problem areas' - among them, Little India and getting Singaporeans to stop throwing their cigarette butts on the floor.

Dr Hosein has been working with the NEA since last month on a study about Singapore's litter issue. He likened Little India to New Year's Eve in New York - only in Singapore it is a weekly affair in which foreign workers come to enjoy the 'carnival' in Serangoon Road.

'To put it bluntly, you cannot expect people who have been living around a mess for 10, 15 years of their life, to come here for two years to work and change their mentality,' he said.

He added that when it comes to foreign workers, enforcement is the only way to make sure cleanliness is adhered to.

'Even if you are not meting out a fine, you must have officers patrolling the area to give the appearance of enforcement,' he said.

As for cigarette butts, he said Singaporeans tended to give the excuse that there were not enough rubbish bins in sight.

In Japan, however, smokers carry a container in which to put their cigarette stubs before emptying them into a dustbin.

One audience member asked if Singaporeans tended to litter because they are used to maids cleaning up after them.

Dr Geh Min, former Nature Society president and a panellist at the event, related a story about a mother who wanted her son taken out of a school project which involved weighing the amount of litter the school produced. 'She offered her maid to do her son's part,' she said.

Relating her own experience at home, panellist and guest of honour Dr Amy Khor, Senior Parliamentary Secretary (Environment and Water Resources), said: 'When my family eats, everyone just gets up and leaves the table without clearing the table unless I remind them. I can only imagine when I'm not at home.'

Other panellists said that while some parents were not good role models for their children, there were occasions when children managed to convince their parents to change their bad behaviour.


Read more!

Don’t Despair, Repair

Nature recovers from damage sooner than expected
Journal Watch Online 29 May 09;

Be skeptical of frequent claims that humans are doing irreparable harm to our environment that will take centuries or millennia to repair. Two Yale University researchers compiled 240 independent studies of polluted or damaged ecosystems and came to what they call a startling conclusion: once humans committed to their restoration, most ecosystems healed within a matter of decades.

Eighty-three of the ecosystems analyzed by these studies showed full recovery for variables representing ecosystem function, animal community and plant community health; 90 had mixed results, 67 showed no recovery, the PLoS ONE study found.

Forests took the longest to recover, an average of 42 years, while many aquatic systems needed between 10 and 20 years. Meanwhile around a half a century was needed to mend ecosystems harmed by agriculture or a multiplicity of threats, whereas the effects of oil spills, trawling, invasive species, and mining were reversed in less than a decade.

The authors say their study redeems the value of restoration to those who would monger visions of doom and insist on chronicling ecosystem destruction in hopes of banning all human activity in “natural” areas. “Our results are not intended to give license to exploit ecosystems without regard to sustainability,” they write. “The message of our paper is that recovery is possible and can be rapid for many ecosystems, giving much hope for humankind to transition to sustainable management of global ecosystems.” – Jessica Leber

Source: Jones, H.P. and Schmitz, O.J. et al. 2009. Rapid Recovery of Damaged Ecosystems. PLoS ONE DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005653


Read more!

Call for support to end wildlife trade in Malaysia

Letter to the editor: More support needed from other agencies to prevent poaching and end wildlife trade
WWF 29 May 09;

TRAFFIC Southeast Asia and WWF-Malaysia applaud the Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), particularly the enforcement team in Perak, for nabbing poachers in the Bintang Hijau Forest Reserve in Perak (Poachers Nabbed in Perak Reserve, May 25).

Their efforts to safeguard protected areas and wildlife against poachers, is a clear commitment to tackling a problem that is an increasing concern for Malaysia.

Poaching is the first step in the chain of illegal wildlife trade and consumption that could leave us with empty forests one day. Areas like the Bintang Hijau Forest Reserve where the Cambodian poachers were nabbed are home to many threatened species such as the Sumatran rhinoceros, clouded leopard and Sambar deer. It is also an important tiger landscape as outlined in the National Tiger Action Plan.

As previous enforcement actions have shown, it is not the only area under threat.

WWF-Malaysia has also found signs of local and foreign encroachment and poaching along the Grik-Jeli highway which provides the access points into the Belum-Temengor forest complex. In these areas, some animals are specifically targeted by poachers, others are killed opportunistically by poachers searching for non-timber forest products such as gaharu (agarwood).

Therefore the department’s move to step up enforcement efforts in the Hulu Perak district, including the Gerik-Jeli highway, is an excellent and timely move.

TRAFFIC and WWF-Malaysia urge the department to continue its good work and not to stop at nabbing poachers, but to further follow the trail of the illegal wildlife traders they supply.

Stopping armed poachers is dangerous and difficult work that needs the support of many agencies. TRAFFIC and WWF-Malaysia call on other national enforcement agencies including the police, army, Customs Department and Forestry Department to join in the fight to stamp out poaching and cross-border encroachment.

The public can do their part by reporting wildlife crime to the Wildlife Crime Hotline, via SMS to
019-3564194.

From: Dato' Dr. Dionysius S.K. Sharma D.P.M.P., Executive Director/CEO, WWF-Malaysia and Noorainie Awang Anak, Senior Programme Officer, TRAFFIC Southeast Asia


Read more!

Rare Madagascan tortoises stolen

BBC News 28 May 09;

Four of the world's rarest tortoises have been stolen from a captive breeding programme in Madagascar.

The ploughshare tortoises were being raised by The Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust in a bid to bolster the wild population.

The species is so rare that less than 500 are thought to survive in the wild.

Unless they are recovered conservationists believe the stolen tortoises are destined for private collections in Europe, US or Asia.

The theft took place on the evening of the 6 May.

The thieved entered pre-release enclosures inside Baly Bay National Park, Madagascar, where eight ploughshare tortoises were being kept under quarantine prior to being released.

These enclosures were at a secret location and not accessible to the public.

All four stolen animals were nearly mature animals, which Durrell had spent years raising. The four were part of a group of 44 specimens that Durrell is attempting to release into the wild.

The ploughshare tortoise ( Astrochelys yniphora ) of North-western Madagascar is the largest of Madagascar's tortoises. Adults reach about 45cm in length. The entire wild population is found within the Baly Bay National Park, and the species is classified as Critically Endangered by IUCN.

Bush fires and bush pigs pose a threat to the future survival of the species, as does the illegal pet trade. Due to the tortoise's rarity individuals can change hands for thousands of dollars.

Local law enforcement agencies kept news of the theft quiet while enquires continued. They have since made arrests connected to the theft, but the missing animals have not yet been recovered.

"As with many other species around the world, greed is proving to be the major threat facing the ploughshare tortoise," says Andrew Terry, Durrell's Conservation Manager.

"The selfish desires of foreign collectors could in the end send this species to extinction. We are doing what we can to protect and restore the ploughshare, but if the international demand remains this high we will end up fighting a losing battle."


Read more!

Beavers return to the UK after 400-year gap

BBC News 29 May 09;

A total of 11 beavers have been released into the wild in Argyll as part of a reintroduction programme.

Four more may join the Scottish Beaver Trial being run in Knapdale Forest.

The beavers have been brought to Scotland from Norway and their release marks a return to the UK after a 400-year absence.

The release will be studied to determine whether the trial should be extended and beavers reintroduced across Scotland.

Colin Galbraith, of Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), has been an enthusiastic backer of the scheme.

He said: "I think this is a hugely exciting move and one in which we've got to take people with us.

"There's never been a reintroduction of a mammal back to the UK.

"We've done the red kite and the sea eagle - they've gone pretty well - people are now behind that.

"We've got to try to do this reintroduction of a mammal in a very scientific careful and monitored way."

But not everyone has been behind the scheme.

Alan Kettlewhite is a biologist with Argyll Fisheries Trust: "Potentially they can alter the habitats of fish, restricting access to spawning grounds.

"I think the concerns are based on studies in other countries where sometimes dam-building can prevent fish access to their spawning grounds, particularly in dry years where you don't get much rain in the autumn time."

But SNH's Colin Galbraith said he felt a duty towards the beavers: "For me the argument is very simple.

"They were here - we killed them out.

"I think we've got the moral obligation to bring them back."

Continuously tested

Project officer Jenny Holden said: "The main things people are concerned about are giardia and cryptosporidium.

"They are bacteria that can infect the guts of humans and make you feel really quite unwell - food-poisoning type bugs.

"The beavers that are released will have been tested continuously for six months and then throughout the five year trial to make sure they are clear of these bacteria.

"So if we find a few years down the line that the beavers are infected, they won't have brought it in, they will have caught it out in the environment here."

Darren Dobson is from the Carinbaan Hotel near the release site.

He is delighted at the prospect of beavers, and hopes they will prove to be a major tourist attraction.

He said: "Generally speaking it's all positive. I haven't met anyone myself who is negative to the idea.

"It's going to bring more tourists - and this is just one more thing to add to what this area's got."

Scottish Natural Heritage, (SNH), will monitor the relationship between beavers and woodland, water plants, river habitat, water levels, otters, dragonflies, damselflies and freshwater fish.

The beavers themselves will also be under close scrutiny, using tracking data.

SNH will co-ordinate the scientific monitoring work with a range of independent bodies, including Oxford University Wildlife Conservation Research Unit and the Argyll Fisheries Trust.

SNH is contributing £275,000 to the cost of monitoring the trial.

It is claimed the trial will be a major contribution to Scotland's Species Action Framework, which identifies 32 species, including European beaver, as the focus of new management action.

Wild beavers return to British waters for first time in 200 years
• Release of native species a reintroduction victory
• Lodges built for family groups in Argyll forest
Severin Carrell, The Guardian 29 May 09;

It has been described as a "tubby spaniel" by its admirers and as a "destructive nocturnal rat" by its critics. Now, the beaver is officially back in the wild in Britain.

At least two centuries after the species was hunted to extinction in the UK, three beaver families have been released into three lochs in forest unpopulated by people near the Sound of Jura in Argyll.

The release marks the most ambitious mammal reintroduction programme to date in Britain.

The first two families were shepherded into man-made "lodges" in Knapdale forestry reserve today. The last family will be uncaged tomorrow by the Scottish environment minister ­Roseanna Cunningham. "Welcoming beavers back to Scotland marks a historic day for conservation," Cunningham said. "These charismatic creatures are not only likely to create interest in Scotland from further afield but crucially can play a key role in providing good habitat for a wide range of wetland species."

Allan Bantick, chairman of the Scottish Beaver Trial partnership, said: "Beavers are a native species made extinct by man and we are hoping our trial reintroduction is a step towards seeing this corrected."

However, it emerged today that the project has suffered problems. Five of the 17 beavers, which were imported from Norway last November, died while in quarantine at a Devon reserve – reportedly from unrelated causes. So the organisers, left with only three families and one adult, held back those remaining. They hope a family will later be produced for Knapdale. Meantime, the Royal ­Zoological Society of Scotland, a partner in the five-year pilot project, recruited instead two other beaver families, held in Scotland.

Plans also for a second pilot, testing beaver reintroduction in populated Highland areas, were dropped, partly after complaints from the salmon industry. That was to have started as early as next year.

The beavers project has identified Insh Marshes national nature reserve near Kingussie as their favoured site, but the Scottish government and Scottish Natural Heritage want this delayed until the Knapdale project has been properly tested.

In the next few months, naturalists in Wales are also hoping to name six possible beaver release sites, then reintroduce the animals in two to three years' time.

Natural England began its beaver re­lease consultation in March, identifying among areas the New Forest, Bodmin Moor in Cornwall, and the Forest of Bowland in Lancashire, as prime beaver habitat.

Naturalists in England and Wales hope to avoid the controversy that dogged the Scottish project. The first plan to release beavers in Knapdale was vetoed by ministers in 2005 after intense lobbying from lairds, farmers and fisheries who claimed the animals would damage salmon and trout rivers, as well as flood farmland and commercial forestry with their dams.

But, by felling trees, creating lakeside lagoons and opening up forest canopies, beavers create richer riverside habitats and help to prevent flooding by increasing the size of wetlands.


Read more!

Everglades Swamped With Invading Pythons

Jim Loney, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

THE EVERGLADES - The population of Burmese pythons in Florida's Everglades may have grown to as many as 150,000 as the non-native snakes make a home and breed in the fragile wetlands, officials said Thursday.

Wildlife biologists say the troublesome invaders -- dumped in the Everglades by pet owners who no longer want them -- have become a pest and pose a significant threat to endangered species like the wood stork and Key Largo woodrat.

"They eat things that we care about," said Skip Snow, an Everglades National Park biologist, as he showed a captured, 15-foot (4.6-meter) Burmese python to U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who was on his first fact-finding mission to the Everglades since the Obama administration took office.

With Snow maintaining a strong grip on its head, the massive snake hissed angrily at Salazar and the other federal officials who gathered around it at a recreation area off Alligator Alley in the vast saw grass prairie. It took two other snake wranglers to control the python's body.

"A snake this size could eat a small deer or a bobcat without too much trouble," Snow told Salazar before the secretary boarded an airboat for a tour of the Everglades.

Everglades biologists have been grappling with the growing python problem for a decade. The snakes are one of the largest species in the world and natives of Southeast Asia, but they found a home to their liking in the Everglades when pet owners started using the wetland as a convenient dumping ground.

"They're fine when they're small but they can live 25 to 30 years. When they get bigger you have to feed them small animals like rabbits, and cleaning up after them, it's like cleaning up after a horse," Snow said. "People don't want big snakes."

TRAPPERS AND HUNTERS

Pythons captured in the Everglades are often killed. Wildlife officials are trying trapping and other eradication methods, and are considering offering bounties to hunters. Scientists are experimenting with ways to lure the snakes into traps, including the use of pheromones -- chemicals that serve as sexual attractants -- as bait.

"They are estimating there are 150,000 of these snakes. They proliferate so quickly," said Florida Senator Bill Nelson, who accompanied Salazar on the airboat tour of the Everglades. "They've already found grown deer, they've found full sized bobcats inside them. It's just a matter of time before one gets the highly endangered Florida panther."

But biologists played down the risk to the panther, the most endangered species in the Everglades. There are believed to be only about 100 left, but they range over a territory of some 2 million acres.

"It would take some awfully unique circumstances for a python and a panther to meet up," said Darrell Land, a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission biologist. "And the cats are very wary and they have very quick reaction times."

Pythons are not the only invader troubling the Everglades.

New fish and rodent species have also become pests, and two thriving colonies of the Nile monitor lizard, an Africa native that can grow to 7 feet in length, have established themselves on opposite sides of the state.

Nelson, a Democrat, said the Obama administration had committed $200 million, including $100 million of stimulus money, so far this year to Everglades restoration, a 35-year project valued at $8 billion when it was started nearly a decade ago.

The project is designed to restore natural water flow and native wildlife populations to the shallow, slow-moving river that dominates the interior of southern Florida.

(Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Mohammad Zargham)


Read more!

Noisy ecotourists get wild birds in a flap
Bob Holmes, New Scientist 28 May 09;

Ecotourists who "ooh" and "aah" over the marvels of nature may be doing more harm than if they appreciated the animals silently. Some species, it turns out, become significantly more stressed by even quiet conversation.

Daniel Karp, of Stanford University in California, studied three colonies of hoatzins, a large primitive bird popular with tourists, near several ecotourism lodges in the Peruvian Amazon.

Karp and his colleagues approached individual hoatzins by canoe either silently or while playing recordings of tourist conversation at different levels.

These started at a volume of 50 decibels, which is just a little louder than the hushed conversation of a library and typical of ecotourists' "don't scare them" chat; and rose to 60 and 70 dB, which equal and exceed the loudest conversations of actual tourists. On each approach, the researchers recorded the distance at which the bird became visibly agitated, and the distance at which it took flight.

The sound of even a quiet conversation caused the birds to begin clucking and defecating – a common defence response – at longer approach distances than for quiet approaches. The noisiest approaches also caused the birds to fly off more readily. Previous studies have shown that stressed hoatzins are less likely to rear chicks successfully.
'Zipped lips'

As time passed during Karp's month-long study, the hoatzins gradually allowed silent people to approach more closely before becoming agitated, indicating that the birds were becoming accustomed to the people. In contrast, the hoatzins showed no such adaptation to approaches that included playback of conversation.

Karp's results show that ecotourism is not as benign as many people think, says Dan Blumstein, a behavioural ecologist and conservation biologist at the University of California at Los Angeles. "We all want to pat ourselves on the back and say ecotourism is good for the environment, but we ignore the fact that there may be deleterious consequences."

Karp takes a more sanguine view. If tourists learn to keep their lips zipped and maintain a safe distance, they can get closer to the birds without agitating them, he says.

Journal reference: Biodiversity and Conservation (DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9675-6)


Read more!

Cuckoo's call becomes rarer in UK

BBC News 27 May 09;

The cuckoo - known for its springtime song - has joined a "red list" of the UK's most threatened bird species.

The lapwing, yellow wagtail and herring gull are also deemed to be urgently in need of conservation action. In the latest assessment of the UK's bird population, the number red-listed has risen by 5% since 2002, to more than one in five.

The RSPB said the growing number of charismatic, widespread and familiar birds now on the list was "scandalous".

RSPB conservation director Mark Avery said the "most shocking" decline was that of summer-visiting birds, like the cuckoo, which has seen numbers fall by 37% in the last 15 years.

Experts are not yet certain why migrant birds are in decline in the UK.

The number of red-listed species has risen to 52 (21%) out of 246 birds assessed, which is up from 40 species (16%) when the last assessment was done in 2002.

Most birds on the red list have seen their range or populations decline by more than half in recent years, or have undergone historical declines since 1800, from which they have not fully recovered.

The house sparrow, starling and song thrush are among the once-common British birds now on the list.

Some 21 red-listed bird species are summer visitors, most of which spend the winter in sub-Saharan Africa.

Missing song

In the latest assessment, there was good news for the bullfinch, quail, reed bunting, Scottish crossbill, stone curlew and woodlark - which were all downgraded from the red list to "amber".

They had either increased their populations or range - mainly as a result of improvements in management of farmland for the stone curlew, and heathland for the woodlark - or more had been discovered about their numbers, as with the Scottish crossbill.

The assessment results will be published in the June edition of British Birds.

Andy Clements, director of the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), said: "A gap all of us will notice is the lack of the cuckoo's familiar song. Their decline is emblematic of downward trends in many long-distance migrants from Africa."

He said BTO and its partners were working on research to try to understand why migrant birds are in decline.

"As this report shows, when we know what to do, and there are funds to do it, we can improve the fortunes of birds such as stone curlew and woodlark."

Although the cause of the cuckoo's decline is not known, a number of theories have been discussed, said the RSPB's Grahame Madge.

Research will look at whether there are problems with habitat, either in the UK or in Africa, or on their migration route, he said.

The species relies heavily on hairy moth caterpillars for food and, with many species of butterfly and moth are also suffering declines, a diminishing food supply could be having an impact.

In addition, with cuckoos laying their eggs in other birds nests, there may be issues with their key hosts, such as the meadow pipit and dunnock, being in decline.

While no link to climate change has been proved, there are concerns that, with European temperatures rising, migratory birds are losing their ecological advantage over birds which over-winter in Europe.

The addition of five species to the red list - Temminck's stint, ruff, whimbrel, redwing and fieldfare - which are at the southern edge of their spread in the British Isles, could suggest a shift in range brought on by a changing climate.

Seabirds join list

For the first time, two winter visitors, the dunlin and the scaup, have been added to the red list because of declines in their wintering populations.

Rich Hearn, the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust's head of species monitoring, said their inclusion highlighted an "increasingly widespread phenomenon of climate change-driven shifts in distribution".

Three seabirds have also joined the red list, the Balearic shearwater, which is at a higher risk of global extinction than the giant panda; the Arctic skua, the only bird to go straight from the low-concern "green list" straight to red; and the herring gull.

The assessment, Birds of Conservation Concern 3, is compiled by a group of organisations including the BTO, Countryside Council for Wales, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Natural England, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, RSPB, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust.

Society warns cuckoo bird in danger of extinction
Michael Bushnell, Associated Press Yahoo News 28 May 09;

LONDON – Britain's cuckoo bird, known for its distinctive call, is in danger of extinction along with 51 other species, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said in a new report Thursday.

It found that 21 percent of Britain's bird species face extinction unless steps are taken to protect them, spokesman Tim Webb said. He said the cuckoo and other birds that visit Britain in the summer have suffered population loss largely due to a decrease in food and water supply in sub-Saharan Africa, where many migrate from.

The problem is difficulty in finding food, he said.

"The Sahara desert is spreading and the birds are having a hard time flying out in good condition," Webb said. "There isn't just one single problem, there are a host."

The society said the cuckoo population in Britain has declined 37 percent since 1994.

The population declines were not limited to summer migratory birds like cuckoos. Native birds such as the herring gull also made the threatened list.

Six species did see a recovery in the past seven years, however. The report said the woodlark has seen a "dramatic" increase in population, as had the stone-curlew. Webb said these birds saw healthy gains thanks to an increased effort to maintain woodlands that would allow their numbers to grow.

Webb said the inclusion of such well-known birds as the cuckoo and herring gull on the list could serve as an eye-opener to people who are unaware of the decline in bird population.

"Everyone thinks they are always there," he said of the birds. "They didn't think that such common birds would be struggling, and if nothing changes we will see them disappear."

Cuckoo Becomes One Of UK's Most Threatened Birds
Stephen Addison, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

LONDON - The cuckoo, traditional harbinger of Spring, has become one of Britain's most threatened birds, joining a "red list" of the 52 most vulnerable species.

Numbers of the bird famous for laying its eggs in others' nests are down almost 40 percent in 15 years.

Others on the danger list, which now accounts for 21 percent of all Britain's bird species, include the lapwing, yellow wagtail, the house sparrow and the starling.

The 2009 list was published on Thursday by the RSPB charity on behalf of a range of conservation bodies like the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and the British Trust for Ornithology. The last survey was compiled in 2002.

The RSPB said the continued decline of widespread farmland and woodland birds is a theme which has developed since then.

Lapwing, a formerly widespread wading bird, and the hawfinch, a woodland bird largely confined to England, have both joined the red list in the latest assessment.

"An increasing number of charismatic, widespread and familiar birds are joining the list of those species most in need of help; this is scandalous," said Mark Avery, the RSPB's Conservation Director.

"When the RSPB was formed 120 years ago, few would have been concerned about the cuckoo, lapwing, starling or house sparrow.

"Now these birds are some of our greatest conservation priorities. Most shocking is the more recently observed and drastic decline of summer-visiting birds, typified by the cuckoo."

Other visitors at risk include the wood warbler, and tree pipit.

Their addition to the red list is highlighting the concern that many long-distance migratory birds nesting in Europe and wintering in Africa are increasingly in trouble, the RSPB said.

Three species of seabird join the list for the first time.

The Balearic shearwater -- a smaller relative of the albatross -- visits Britain from its Mediterranean breeding grounds regularly each autumn.

This seabird, which the RSPB said is thought to face a higher risk of global extinction even than the giant panda, is the rarest bird to regularly occur in the UK.

Highlighting concerns about the fortunes of seabirds around the northern coasts of the British Isles, the Arctic skua has joined the red list, as has the familiar herring gull.

However, six species: the stone-curlew, woodlark, quail, Scottish crossbill, bullfinch and reed bunting, have been removed from the 2002 red list, largely because of a recovery in their numbers or range, or a better understanding of their populations.

(Editing by Michael Holden)


Read more!

Why Coral Reefs Around The World Are Collapsing

ScienceDaily 29 May 09;

An explosion of knowledge has been made in the last few years about the basic biology of corals, researchers say in a new report, helping to explain why coral reefs around the world are collapsing and what it will take for them to survive a gauntlet of climate change and ocean acidification.

Corals, it appears, have a genetic complexity that rivals that of humans, have sophisticated systems of biological communication that are being stressed by global change, and are only able to survive based on proper function of an intricate symbiotic relationship with algae that live within their bodies.

After being a highly successful life form for 250 million years, disruptions in these biological and communication systems are the underlying cause of the coral bleaching and collapse of coral reef ecosystems around the world, scientists report in the journal Science.

The research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation.

"We've known for some time the general functioning of corals and the problems they are facing from climate change," said Virginia Weis, a professor of zoology at Oregon State University. "But until just recently, much less has been known about their fundamental biology, genome structure and internal communication. Only when we really understand how their physiology works will we know if they can adapt to climate changes, or ways that we might help."

Corals are tiny animals, polyps that exist as genetically identical individuals, and can eat, defend themselves and kill plankton for food. In the process they also secrete calcium carbonate that becomes the basis for an external skeleton on which they sit. These calcified deposits can grow to enormous sizes over long periods of time and form coral reefs – one of the world's most productive ecosystems, which can harbor more than 4,000 species of fish and many other marine life forms.

But corals are not really self sufficient. Within their bodies they harbor highly productive algae – a form of marine plant life – that can "fix" carbon, use the energy of the sun to conduct photosynthesis and produce sugars.

"Some of these algae that live within corals are amazingly productive, and in some cases give 95 percent of the sugars they produce to the coral to use for energy," Weis said. "In return the algae gain nitrogen, a limiting nutrient in the ocean, by feeding off the waste from the coral. It's a finely developed symbiotic relationship."

What scientists are learning, however, is that this relationship is also based on a delicate communication process from the algae to the coral, telling it that the algae belong there, and that everything is fine. Otherwise the corals would treat the algae as a parasite or invader and attempt to kill it.

"Even though the coral depends on the algae for much of its food, it may be largely unaware of its presence," Weis said. "We now believe that this is what's happening when the water warms or something else stresses the coral – the communication from the algae to the coral breaks down, the all-is-well message doesn't get through, the algae essentially comes out of hiding and faces an immune response from the coral."

This internal communication process, Weis said, is not unlike some of the biological processes found in humans and other animals. One of the revelations in recent research, she said, is the enormous complexity of coral biology, and even its similarity to other life forms. A gene that controls skeletal development in humans, for instance, is the identical gene in corals that helps it develop its external skeleton – conserved in the different species over hundreds of millions of years since they parted from a common ancestor on their separate evolutionary paths.

There's still much to learn about this process, researchers said, and tremendous variation in it. For one thing, there are 1,000 species of coral and perhaps thousands of species of algae all mixing and matching in this symbiotic dance. And that variation, experts say, provides at least some hope that combinations will be found which can better adapt to changing conditions of ocean temperature, acidity or other threats.

The problems facing coral reefs are still huge, and increasing. They are being pressured by changes in ocean temperature, pollution, overfishing, sedimentation, acidification, oxidative stress and disease, and the synergistic effect of some of these problems may destroy reefs even when one cause by itself would not. Some estimates have suggested 20 percent of the world's coral reefs are already dead and an additional 24 percent are gravely threatened.

The predicted acidification of the oceans in the next century is expected to decrease coral calcification rates by 50 percent and promote the dissolving of coral skeletons, the researchers noted in their report.

"With some of the new findings about coral symbiosis and calcification, and how it works, coral biologists are now starting to think more outside the box," Weis said. "Maybe there's something we could do to help identify and protect coral species that can survive in different conditions. Perhaps we won't have to just stand by as the coral reefs of the world die and disappear."


Read more!

An Inconvenient Truth for Fish

New film The End of the Line tackles the problem of overfishing around the world by pointing the finger at celebrity restaurateurs - and even the ordinary consumer.

Jeni Oppenheimer, The Telegraph 28 May 09;

The End of the Line looks to be the biggest environmental film since An Inconvenient Truth.

Taking the role of Al Gore in explaining a problem that is well known to scientists but has yet to hit the mainstream, Charles Clover, a former Daily Telegraph journalist, outlines the threat to the oceans.

He makes the assertion that if the fishing industry is not regulated, the world will be out of seafood around 2048. This would result in starvation for 1.2 billion people, as fish is a key part of their diet – unless you want to survive on jellyfish burgers.

The film opens with sweeping shots of boats on the water before cutting dramatically to scenes of 1,000s of silvery bodies being landed and people shoving tuna into their mouths – quite possibly in a celebrity restaurant.

As Mr Clover says, fish is no longer a guilt-free meal: "Trolling (using drag nets along the bottom of the ocean) is like ploughing a field seven times a year."

He aims to show the viewer why we should all be thinking twice before ordering fish and chips.

One shocking statistic used in the film claims: "The global long-lining industry sets 1.4 billion hooks per year; if you wrapped the lines used around the earth, they could wrap 550 times."

Mr Clover brings it closer to home when he states: "Fifty per cent of the cod caught in the North Sea was caught illegally, so every other fish on your plate was stolen – stolen from you."

Even celebrities are guilty. The film targets restaurant Nobu, part-owned by Robert de Niro and frequented by Brad Pitt and Kate Moss, that is still serving bluefin tuna despite the fact the fish is in danger of extinction.

But it is not just about what we eat. The film makes the points out that without fish, we would face severe problems in all aspects of our society. For example fishermen could become refugees, forced to move due to a lack of employment, starvation, and a problem in the overall balance of our ecosystem.

There is a positive message however. Overfishing could be prevented by regulating the industry and protecting areas in order to conserve our natural resources. Also consumers can help by being more conscious of where fish comes from and whether if it is endangered – although fish farming is not the answer as 40 per cent of those fish get ground up to feed more fish.

One thing is certain, after seeing the fish in this film; viewers will never look at a fish finger the same way ever again.

The End of the Line http://endoftheline.com/


Read more!

E-waste trade is the unacceptable face of recycling

Computer manufacturers must take responsibility for dealing with electronic waste to ensure toxic trash doesn't fall into the wrong hands

Fred Pearce, guardian.co.uk 28 May 09;

Dell, the world's second largest PC manufacturer, announced earlier this month that it is imposing a ban on the export of used equipment bearing its name to developing countries – unless the equipment is in full working order and intended for legitimate use.

The idea is to undermine the huge trade in e-waste, too much of which ends up in giant trash piles in Africa, India and China, from where it is dismantled, burned, treated with corrosive chemicals and otherwise persuaded to give up tiny amounts of chemicals that can be sold on. The big question is why all the other manufacturers don't have a similar policy.

I've seen these toxic waste operations in action. They call it recycling, but it's extremely damaging. In an industrial wasteland outside New Delhi in India, I watched as children as young as eight dunked bare circuit boards in acid to create a residue of copper for sale to a local works. Child labour? You bet. Health and safety? You have to be joking.

A family of migrant boys from Bihar, India's poorest state, told me they got used to the acrid fumes that had them coughing and giddy within minutes of coming on the job. "At the end of the day we have a strong drink and we are OK," one laughed. It's an evil trade. But how do you stop it?

Dell admits that it cannot wave a magic wand and ban its used products from export. But it has a worldwide policy of accepting back without charge all used Dell equipment. It requires all its contractors to accept the used equipment, to follow the new rules – and to act as whistleblowers on rivals who do not.

"This is a very significant announcement," Barbara Kyle of the Electronics Takeback Coalition in the US told Associated Press earlier this month.

The e-waste trade is the unacceptable face of recycling. Greenpeace reckons that as much as 80% of the electronic waste sent for recycling in the US ends up being "recycled" using dangerous low-tech methods in foreign countries. And, despite Europe's tougher laws, a lot gets through the net there, too.

Just a few months ago, Computer Aid International, a charity that gives old computers a new life in schools and other places in developing countries, criticised Britain's Environment Agency for failing to conduct an investigation after British e-waste turned up in the hands of child dismantlers in west Africa.

"What are the other manufacturers doing to ensure a responsible outcome for the equipment?" asked Tony Roberts, of Computer Aid International. "All manufacturers should be held accountable for the disposal of any product manufacturer by them."

Many other companies offer take-back services. But that is very different from imposing rules on their supply chains. And on closer examination, the take-back services often seem half-hearted at best.

The printer maker Lexmark is currently covering Britain with posters advertising its environmental credentials and encouraging users of its printers to print less. Good for them. But what about the e-waste?

In the US, if you want to safely recycle an old Lexmark printer, you have to pay the bill for shipping your printer back to its offices in Tennessee.

A study by Greenpeace this month of the environmental record of electronics companies did not give Dell a great record because it had been slow to eliminate some toxic ingredients from its products. But at least it is now taking a strong stand about making sure those toxins don't get into the wrong hands and it should rise up the Greenpeace chart.

Its rivals will have to do a lot better to keep up. Greenpeace singled out the largest computer manufacturer Hewlett Packard on its handling of e-waste. HP claims to have been "an industry leader in reducing its impact on the environment ... for 50 years", but Greenpeace didn't agree. It criticised HPs weak scheme for voluntary take-back of its equipment amongst other things.

Also criticised for failing to handle e-waste were Acer and Lenovo, whose "commitment to social responsibility" does not highlight e-waste.

These companies need to quit the greenwash and get real about ending this bogus recycling business.


Read more!

Refugees Join List of Climate-Change Issues

Neil MacFarquhar, The New York Times 29 May 09;

UNITED NATIONS — With their boundless vistas of turquoise water framed by swaying coconut palms, the Carteret Islands northeast of the Papua New Guinea mainland might seem the idyllic spot to be a castaway.

But sea levels have risen so much that during the annual king tide season, November to March, the roiling ocean blocks the view from one island to the next, and residents stash their possessions in fishing nets strung between the palm trees.

“It gives you the scary feeling that you don’t know what is going to happen to you, that any minute you will be floating,” Ursula Rakova, the head of a program to relocate residents, said by telephone. The chain could well be uninhabitable by 2015, locals believe, but two previous attempts to abandon it ended badly, when residents were chased back after clashing with their new neighbors on larger islands.

This dark situation underlies the thorny debate over the world’s responsibilities to the millions of people likely to be displaced by climate change.

There could be 200 million of these climate refugees by 2050, according to a new policy paper by the International Organization for Migration, depending on the degree of climate disturbances. Aside from the South Pacific, low-lying areas likely to be battered first include Bangladesh and nations in the Indian Ocean, where the leader of the Maldives has begun seeking a safe haven for his 300,000 people. Landlocked areas may also be affected; some experts call the Darfur region of Sudan, where nomads battle villagers in a war over shrinking natural resources, the first significant conflict linked to climate change.

In the coming days, the United Nations General Assembly is expected to adopt the first resolution linking climate change to international peace and security. The hard-fought resolution, brought by 12 Pacific island states, says that climate change warrants greater attention from the United Nations as a possible source of upheaval worldwide and calls for more intense efforts to combat it. While all Pacific island states are expected to lose land, some made up entirely of atolls, like Tuvalu and Kiribati, face possible extinction.

“For the first time in history, you could actually lose countries off the face of the globe,” said Stuart Beck, the permanent representative for Palau at the United Nations. “It is a security threat to them and their populations, which will have to be relocated, which is the security threat to the places where they go, among other consequences.”

The issue has inspired intense wrangling, with some nations accusing the islanders of both exaggerating the still murky consequences of climate change and trying to expand the mandate of the Security Council by asking it to take action.

“We don’t consider climate change is an issue of security that properly belongs in the Security Council; rather, it is a development issue that has some security aspects,” said Maged A. Abdelaziz, the Egyptian ambassador. “It is an issue of how to prevent certain lands, or certain countries, from being flooded.”

The island states are seeking a response akin to the effort against terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks. “The whole system bent itself to the task, and that is what we want,” Mr. Beck said, adding that the Council should even impose sanctions on countries that fail to act. “If you really buy into the notion that the Suburban you are driving is causing these islands to go under, there ought to be a cop.”

As it is, the compromise resolution does not mention such specific steps, one of the reasons it is expected to pass. Britain, which introduced climate change as a Security Council discussion topic two years ago, supports it along with most of Europe, while other permanent Council members — namely, the United States, China and Russia — generally backed the measure once it no longer explicitly demanded Council action.

Scientific studies distributed by the United Nations or affiliated agencies generally paint rising seas as a threat. A 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, detailing shifts expected in the South Pacific, said rising seas would worsen flooding and erosion and threaten towns as well as infrastructure. Some fresh water will turn salty, and fishing and agriculture will wither, it said.

The small island states are not alone in considering the looming threat already on the doorstep. A policy paper released this month by Australia’s Defense Ministry suggests possible violent outcomes in the Pacific. While Australia should try to mitigate the humanitarian suffering caused by global warming, if that failed and conflict erupted, the country should use its military “as an instrument to deal with any threats,” said the paper.

Australia’s previous prime minister, John Howard, was generally dismissive of the problem, saying his country was plagued with “doomsayers.” But a policy paper called “Our Drowning Neighbors,” by the now governing Labor Party, said Australia should help meld an international coalition to address it. Political debates have erupted there and in New Zealand over the idea of immigration quotas for climate refugees. New Zealand established a “Pacific Access Category” with guidelines that mirror the rules for any émigré, opening its borders to a limited annual quota of some 400 able-bodied adults between the ages of 18 and 45 who have no criminal records.

But its position has attracted criticism for leaving out the young and the old, who have the least ability to relocate. Australia’s policy, by contrast, is to try to mitigate the circumstances for the victims where they are, rather than serving as their lifeboat.

The sentiment among Pacific Islanders suggests that they do not want to abandon their homelands or be absorbed into cultures where indigenous people already struggle for acceptance.

“It is about much more than just finding food and shelter,” said Tarita Holm, an analyst with the Palauan Ministry of Resources and Development. “It is about your identity.”

Ms. Rakova, on the Carteret Islands, echoes that sentiment. A year ago, her proposed relocation effort attracted just three families out of a population of around 2,000 people. But after last season’s king tides — the highest of the year — she is scrounging for about $1.5 million to help some 750 people relocate before the tides come again.

Jennifer Redfearn, a documentary maker, has been filming the gradual disappearance of the Carterets for a work called “Sun Come Up.” One clan chief told her he would rather sink with the islands than leave. It now takes only about 15 minutes to walk the length of the largest island, with food and water supplies shrinking all the time.

“It destroys our food gardens, it uproots coconut trees, it even washes over the sea walls that we have built,” Ms. Rakova says on the film. “Most of our culture will have to live in memory.”


Read more!

Carbon trading and cash values on forests cannot curb carbon emissions

Climate change solutions cannot be created by unfettered markets, despite what business leaders think

Oscar Reyes, guardian.co.uk 28 May 09;

When Sir Crispin Tickell had the temerity to suggest that "the business community needs to re-examine the fundamentals of economics" at the recent World Business Summit on Climate Change in Copenhagen, his discordant tone was drowned out by a chorus of more than 800 delegates singing the praises of unfettered markets as a means to tackle climate change.

The commitment to carry on with business as usual took an almost surreal form at times. Indra Nooyi, the chief executive officer of PepsiCo, proudly proclaimed: "The fact that I flew here for 1 1/2 hours to sit on a panel them I'm flying straight back to the US is an example of our commitment to environmental sustainability."

More worryingly, plans for low-carbon technology give the expansion of high-carbon coal power pride of place. The promotional rhetoric is of Carbon Capture and Storage [CCS background guide], yet those from the power sector are blunt about its shortcomings. "One of the plants we are building is CCS ready, although to be quite frank no one really knows what that is at the moment," claimed Steve Lennon, managing director of South Africa's Eskom.

The underlying problem is that business adjusts the problem of climate change to neoliberal economics, which judges value according to financial cost rather than environmental sustainability or social justice. This manifests itself in a promise to massively expand carbon markets [emissions trading background guide]. The idea is that governments give out a limited number of permits to pollute; the scarcity of these permits should encourage their price to rise; and the resulting additional cost to industry and power producers should encourage them to pollute less.

Jos Delbeke, deputy director-general for the environment at the European commission, was in Copenhagen claiming that this is how the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is now working. Yet his department's own data for 2008 shows more international "offset" credits circulating than the level of claimed reductions, while lobbying pressure has resulted in a twin-track system from which every business wins.

On one side, heavy industry like the steel sector has more credits than would be needed to reduce its emissions, so it sells them. Delbeke shared a panel on carbon markets with a representative of ArcelorMittal, which alone gained an estimated subsidy of more than €1bn between 2005 and 2008 by this means.

On the other side, power companies pay less for pollution permits than the cost they pass on to consumers, generating windfall profits that could reach up to around €70bn by 2012. The circulation of these permits does nothing to help new investment in renewables.

Other measures to avoid business obligations displace the problem of tackling climate change on to developing countries. The Summit's final Copenhagen Call talks of a crucial role for forest protection in developing countries, and that such measures should represent around half of the action needed to limit climate change by 2020.

These figures are taken directly from Project Catalyst, an initiative bringing together "climate negotiatiors, senior government officials... and business executives", whose presentation (marked confidential) more straightforwardly emphasises the "the size of the prize for business". It also speaks of the opportunities for "companies in forest management, pulp and paper, or construction" to access a "€20-30bn value chain" in developing countries.

Strikingly similar assumptions have found their way into negotiating texts on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD), which will be discussed when UN climate negotiations resume in Bonn next week. Yet the whole idea that deforestation can be stopped by simply putting a price on forests is flawed, with forest communities and indigenous peoples warning that it will encourage further land grabs by large companies. They point to evidence that the real drivers of deforestation are the major construction, mining, logging and plantation developments whose owners stand to be rewarded by REDD funds.

These are the voices that the world should be listening to as it seeks to tackle climate change. Even the self-proclaimed "progressives" of big business seem to be putting profit margins above environmental need. Without a more fundamental re-examination, to paraphrase one panellist, they look set to remain on the back end of a horse that is galloping in the wrong direction.

• Oscar Reyes is a researcher with Carbon Trade Watch, a project of the Transnational Institute, and environment editor of Red Pepper magazine.

* Print thisPrintable version
* Send to a friendSend to a friend
* Share thisShare
* Clip thisClip
* Contact usContact us
* larger | smaller

Email
Close
Recipient's email address
Your first name
Your surname
Add a note (optional)

Your IP address will be logged
Share
Close

* Digg
* reddit
* Google Bookmarks
* Twitter
* del.icio.us
* StumbleUpon
* Newsvine
* livejournal
* Facebook
* Mixx it!

Contact us
Close

*
Contact the Environment editor
environment@guardian.co.uk

* Report errors or inaccuracies: userhelp@guardian.co.uk
* Letters for publication should be sent to: letters@guardian.co.uk

* If you need help using the site: userhelp@guardian.co.uk
* Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 3353 2000
*
o Advertising guide
o License/buy our content

Environment

* Emissions trading ·
* Climate change ·
* Carbon capture and storage (CCS) ·
* Carbon emissions

Business
Series

* The road to Copenhagen

More comment

Related
13 May 2009

Cleaner air from reduced emissions could save millions of lives, says report
12 Dec 2008

Two years of leadership on climate change and two days of hard haggling
24 Nov 2008

Environment Agency chairman urges government to launch 'green new deal'
7 Aug 2008

James Randerson on a warning to the government that temperatures will rise 4C

* Print thisPrintable version
* Send to a friendSend to a friend
* Share thisShare
* Clip thisClip
* Contact usContact us
* Article historyAr


Read more!

Forest Carbon Offers Cheaper Way To Curb Warming

Deborah Zabarenko, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

WASHINGTON - Counting the climate-warming carbon dioxide locked up in forests could offer a cheaper way to curb the greenhouse gas than by considering only emissions from industry and fossil fuels, according to a new study.

Factories, power plants and petroleum-powered vehicles are likely to emit some 500 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere this century, according to the study released on Thursday in the journal Science.

By contrast, the world's forests hold some 2 trillion tons of carbon. As long as the forests stand, that huge amount of greenhouse gas stays out of the atmosphere, but if some of these woodlands are cleared for farming -- including biofuel crops like ethanol -- they start releasing carbon into the air, where it can add to the problem of climate change.

So even "green" fuels can have a carbon cost, said study co-author James Edmonds, an economist at the Energy Department's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and the Joint Global Change Research Institute in Maryland.

Right now, the carbon stored in forests has no calculated economic value, Edmonds said in a telephone interview.

But if the carbon emissions from chopped-down forests are factored into the overall cost of capping atmospheric carbon this century, the price is much less than if only industrial and fossil fuel emissions are considered, Edmonds said.

"The results in management of the landscape are dramatically different and starkly contrasted," he said.

To keep atmospheric carbon concentrations at 450 parts per million -- the level advised by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to avoid the worst impacts of global warming -- the model that factored in forest carbon had a carbon price of about $1,300 a ton by the year 2095.

The model that considered only industrial and fossil fuel emissions had a carbon price of $3,500 a ton by century's end.

Carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is currently between 380 and 385 parts per million, compared with a pre-industrial level of about 280 parts per million.


Read more!

Carbon capture technology tested in UK coal-fired power station

BBC News 29 May 09;

New carbon capture technology is being tested for the first time in the UK on a working coal-fired power station.

A 30-tonne test unit will process 1,000 cubic metres of exhaust gas per hour from Longannet power station in Fife.

Carbon dioxide will be removed using chemicals and turned into a liquid, ready for storage underground.

Energy company ScottishPower wants to test technology which could lead to a full scale carbon capture plant becoming operational by 2014.

The UK government recently gave the go-ahead for a new generation of coal-fired power stations provided they were able to limit their CO2 emissions.

The scientists have focussed on the post-combustion method of carbon capture and storage (CCS) which aims to trap greenhouse emissions after fossil fuels have been burnt.

The plant, developed by Aker Clean Carbon, will enable them to assess the effectiveness of chemicals, known as amines, at removing CO2.

Researchers from the University of Edinburgh will join the project, testing three different types of amine solution over the next three months.

ScottishPower chief executive Nick Horler said: "This is the first time that CCS technology has been switched on and working at an operational coal-fired power station in the UK.

"It's a major step forward in delivering the reality of carbon-free fossil fuel electricity generation."

Research centre

ScottishPower's parent company Iberdrola said the UK would be its global centre of excellence for CCS development, bringing together academics, industry experts and engineers.

A professorship of CCS will be based at Edinburgh University, but other academic institutions will also be involved including Imperial College, London.

Iberdrola Chairman Ignacio Galan said: "We believe that the UK can lead the world with CCS technology, creating new skills, jobs and opportunities for growth.

"There is the potential to create an industry on the same scale as North Sea Oil, and we will invest in Scotland and the UK to help to realise this potential."

The Longannet power station opened in 1969 and is the second largest in the UK.

The station chimney is 183m tall, the second highest free-standing structure in Scotland.


Read more!

World Bank To Bolster Sustainable Energy Role

Wojciech Moskwa, PlanetArk 29 May 09;

BERGEN - The World Bank seeks to play a bigger role in sustainable energy projects around the globe including experimental carbon capture and storage (CCS) research, Vice President Katherine Sierra said on Thursday.

Sierra, who is the head of sustainable development at the Washington-based lender funded by countries around the world, said developing states it serves were increasingly looking for low-carbon solutions for their energy problems.

"Clients are first and foremost interested in getting the energy they need to grow in an affordable way ... (but) they are also increasingly aware of the need for sustainable energy," Sierra told Reuters on the sidelines of a carbon conference.

She said wind technology was "penetrating" the energy mix in developing markets and solar energy was picking up despite high costs compared to fossil fuel-based electricity generation which creates the heat-trapping gasses blamed for global warming.

Sierra said still-experimental CCS technology, which siphons carbon dioxide (CO2) from power plant or industrial exhausts and buries it below ground, may be an option for some developing countries which rely heavily on dirtier coal-based power.

CCS is struggling to gain private backers. Governments of rich countries have been paying for most of the initial projects aimed at proving the technology and bringing down costs, leaving room for potential financing by international lenders.

SHARING GREEN TECHNOLOGY

Sierra said the World Bank has traditionally not funded "pre-commercialized technology" such as CCS but rather focused on transferring proven green technology to developing states.

But she said the bank could help fund some CCS projects or studies, including geological surveys, as well as provide clients with know-how on creating renewable energy policies.

"We are having discussions with a few countries to learn what they are doing (with CCS). If there is a request from countries for us to help pull together a financing package we could certainly be interested in discussing it," she said.

How quickly CCS comes to developing markets like China, which relies heavily on coal, could hinge on whether this year's global climate talks in Copenhagen include carbon capture in schemes for sharing green technology with poorer countries.

"Ultimately, we would like to see ambitious targets set by developed countries which translate into a price of carbon which motivates needed changes," she said of the Copenhagen talks.

"Another hope is that there is some type of agreement in terms of technology transfer and a financing mechanism that will fill the gap between what we have now ... and what we will eventually have in place when we have a robust carbon market."

Asked what price was needed to bolster the carbon market, Sierra referred to analyst reports of carbon at 40-50 euros ($55-$69) per metric ton, adding "We will not get there anytime soon."


Read more!

World's leading scientists warn climate change is as great a threat as nuclear warfare

The threat of climate change is as severe as nuclear warfare, according to an emergency summit of the world's Nobel Laureates.

Louise Gray, The Telegraph 29 May 09;

The group of Nobel winners, together with Prince Charles, issued a memorandum which declared the best chance of stopping catastrophic climate change is to keep the predicted temperature rise at or below 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F).

Without action, they envisaged three times that temperature rise, which would mean global warming would cause a huge rise in sea levels, and swamp the cities of London, Paris and Copenhagen.

The communique is likely to influence world leaders at the forthcoming international conference on climate change in Copenhagen at the end of this year.

More than 20 Nobel Laureates, including President Obama's Energy Secretary Steven Chu, gathered at the meeting in London to discuss the threat of global warming.

After three days the St James's Palace Nobel Laureate Symposium concluded that climate change posed a danger of similar proportions to "the threat posed to civilisation by the advent of thermonuclear weapons".

The memorandum read: "The St James's Palace Memorandum calls for a global deal on climate change that matches the scale and urgency of the human, ecological and economic crises facing the world today.

"It urges governments at all levels, as well as the scientific community, to join with business and civil society to seize hold of this historic opportunity to transform our carbon-intensive economies into sustainable and equitable systems. We must recognise the fierce urgency of now.

"We know what needs to be done. We cannot wait until it is too late. We cannot wait until what we value most is lost."

The eminent group unveiled a number of ambitious targets on cutting carbon emissions that go far beyond anything the world has so far managed to achieve during the Kyoto Protocol or any previous international summit on climate change.

They said global greenhouse gases will have to peak by 2015, meaning the current growth in carbon dioxide caused by the rapid development of China and India will have to stop in the next six years.

Developed countries would have to cut reduce greenhouse gas emissions by between 25 to 40 per cent. This means the UK would have to increase its current target of 34 per cent by 2020 and the US would have to commit to any targets for the first time.

The whole world will have to cut emissions by at least 50 per cent by 2050 meaning developing countries will also have to make cuts despite growing demand for energy intensive goods and cars.

The memorandum recommended forcing polluters to pay extra for emitting carbon across large parts of the global economy and massive investment in new technologies such as renewables in order to cut emissions.

There was also a call for emergency funding to stop deforestation, that causes a fifth of carbon emissions every year, by paying poorer countries not to chop down trees.

The paper has been compared to the Einstein-Russell manifesto in 1955 when Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell brought together scientists from around the world to speak out against the threat posed by the H-bomb.

Speaking after the agreement had been signed, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, which organised the summit, said the consequences of not acting were comparable to a nuclear fall out.

"It is comparable in magnitude [to nuclear warfare]. With business as usual we will have another five or six degrees Celsius [9 to 10.8F] – that could not sustain civilisation as we know it, which is quite comparable to a nuclear shoot-out. It would mean 80 metres rise in sea level – London, Paris and Copenhagen would disappear. This could not sustain nine billion people [the predicted population of the world.]"


Read more!