Best of our wild blogs: 18 Jun 10


26 Jun 2010 - Chek Jawa Boardwalk for you
from Adventures with the Naked Hermit Crabs

Two reefs in one trip: the submerged reefs off Pulau Semakau
from wild shores of singapore and Singapore Nature and wonderful creations

Bleaching at the terumbus near Semakau
from wild shores of singapore

Project Semakau Volunteer Recruitment
from Raffles Museum News

Sungei Buloh with Macromaniacs
from Macro Photography in Singapore

Oriental Dwarf Kingfisher and spiders
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Raffles Museum Treasures: Olive-backed sunbird
from Lazy Lizard's Tales


Read more!

Secrecy over Australia oil spill probe

Aljazeera.net 18 Jun 10;

The Australian government has received the final report from an investigation into last year's offshore oil leak in the Timor Sea, but has not said when it will make the findings public.

The spill from the West Atlas rig and Montara wellhead platform off northwest Australia began in August last year, and lasted for 11 weeks leaking an estimated 30,000 barrels of oil into the sea between Western Australia and Indonesia.

The environmental impact of that spill and the current leak in the Gulf of Mexico has cast a spotlight on offshore drilling off Australia's coast with opposition politicians calling for a suspension on new projects and tighter regulations on the industry.

But Australian officials have said they will not release the findings of the report into the Timor Sea leak, one of Australia's worst spills, until "legal constraints" have been cleared.

Speaking to reporters before receiving the report, Martin Ferguson, Australia's resources minister, said that the findings of the investigation would be important to improving safety and regulation of the drilling industry.

However, less than a year after the Timor Sea spill, the government has opened new areas to offshore exploration.

Last month, Ferguson invited companies to bid for permits to explore new "frontiers" of exploration, with companies such as Royal Dutch Shell and ConocoPhillips are among those planning more than $185bn in local oil and gas projects.

On Thursday, Ferguson ruled out suspending offshore drilling, and offered 31 leases in waters as deep as 3750m, more than twice the depth of BP's leaking well in the Gulf of Mexico.

Opposition to the plans has been growing with campaigners urging the government to ensure tighter and more effective regulation of the industry.

'Failures'

Greg Bourne, a former BP senior executive and the current CEO of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in Australia, told Al Jazeera that the findings from the Timor Sea will showed Australia was not immune to a spill like the one in the Gulf of Mexico.

"We'll see failures in regulatory oversight, a sloppiness, a sort of tick-box mentality," he said.

"And, that must change, particularly if there is a decision to push into deeper water where the risks are much greater and the possibilities of an event like the Gulf of Mexico become increasingly possible."

He also said the incident in the Motara oil field showed federal and state regulators "were asleep at the wheel," and that it was a case of "out of sight, out of mind".

His comments mirror those made by US politicians on Thursday where they told Tony Hayward, BP's CEO, that his company ignored the risks of drilling in Gulf of Mexico.

There are several striking parallels between the Montara disaster and the massive Gulf of Mexico spill.

Faulty cementing by US-based company Halliburton on the West Atlas rig is believed to have caused the leak, and the same company did the cementing on BP's sub-contracted Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf.

Wildlife hit

The Montara leak began on August 21 last year after the rig burst into flames, and the flow was not stemmed until early November.

Conservation groups said the slick spread over 90,000sq km, covering large areas of ocean stretching from Australia to Indonesia and East Timor.

Thai company PTTEP, which operated the rig, reported of high rates mortality among sea birds which swam through the slick.

Despite PTTEP's role in the disaster, the Australian government approved the company's acquisition of an offshore oil permit just three months after the 11-week oil leak.

Officials also cleared PTTEP's acquisition of the Oliver field in the Timor Sea before an investigation into the West Atlas accident had even begun.

Gilly Llewellyn, conservation manager for WWF Australia, told the Australian newspaper that the disasters in the Gulf and the Timor Sea should hasten the expansion of conservation areas.

"Given what we've seen in the Gulf of Mexico and the Montara, it's time to step back and ask have we got the balance right in areas for marine conservation," she said.

Less than 10 per cent of Australia's maritime zone is classified as marine park, and only a small part of this area is protected.


Read more!

Blocked drain blamed for Orchard Road flood

PUB will increase checks, install grates to prevent recurrence
Grace Chua & Victoria Vaughan Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

IT WAS just a single drain, about the width of an SBS bus. But it was so badly blocked by debris that it triggered the flooding of Orchard Road on Wednesday.

The critical culvert, at the junction of Tanglin and Orchard roads, drains into two parallel channels flowing under Orchard Road - a drainage system called the Stamford Canal.

The first heavy downpour of the morning had carried debris and vegetation into the 2.7m by 2.7m culvert, starting a chain of events that led eventually to the flash flood.

It was choked where it drained into the side of Delfi Orchard, so water was directed only into the side along Forum the Shopping Mall.

When a second intense rainstorm the same morning added more water to the drains within a short period of time, the canal overflowed and water gushed up to the surface of Orchard Road, causing the worst floods there in 26 years.

Worst-hit was the junction of Scotts Road and Orchard Road, the lowest-lying part of the area. Near the intersection, shops at Liat Towers and the Lucky Plaza basement were flooded.

Although national water agency PUB alerted the traffic police when the sensors at the start of each Stamford Canal channel indicated water levels were at 75 per cent, the water level rose too abruptly to get the alert out to shopkeepers.

At a press conference yesterday, the PUB said the heavy rains were responsible for sweeping the debris into the drain.

It was last checked about three months ago and was not blocked before Wednesday's storm, said Mr Yap Kheng Guan, director of PUB's 3P (Public, Private and People) Network.

After the flood on Wednesday had receded, PUB officers combed the canal for hours, and at 10pm that night found a third of the culvert still blocked.

To fix the problem, the PUB would now conduct checks more often than every three months, he said. It would also install grates in flood-prone areas to prevent debris from being swept into the drains.

Asked why there were no debris traps already installed in a known flood-prone area, he said the existing canal had been 'serving us very well'.

Rain this heavy had occurred twice before, in August last year and January 2008, without severe flooding, so the Stamford Canal has the capacity to handle such a volume of water.

What was unusual about Wednesday's storm was its intensity and its two peaks, he said. The first peak could have brought a certain amount of debris, and there was no way for PUB officers to safely check and clean it out. The next peak soon after might have brought even more debris.

'This is a learning experience for us,' Mr Yap said. 'Perhaps when we're dealing with a storm like this, we have to do something differently.'

In the long run, more sensors would be added to monitor water levels, he said. They would also serve as an early warning system similar to that now in place at Upper Bukit Timah.

Following flash floods in the area last November, flood sensors were installed which will trigger SMS alerts to condominium managements if the water level in the Bukit Timah canal reaches a certain height, so residents can move their cars and other property to safety.

Ms Lee Bee Wah, MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC and deputy chairman of the National Development and Environment Government Parliamentary Committees, said the flooding was a 'timely wake-up call' that something more needs to be done to prevent a similar occurrence.

On Wednesday morning, 101 mm of rain fell over central Singapore in less than three hours. The average rainfall for the entire month of June is 162 mm.

National University of Singapore climate expert Matthias Roth said that though June is usually dry, heavy rain is always a possibility in places located close to the equator.

PUB's work comes under scrutiny
MPs, experts question if water agency had done enough to prevent floods
Victoria Vaughan & Grace Chua Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

MEMBERS of Parliament and experts yesterday questioned if a lack of maintenance was behind the flooding of Orchard Road on Wednesday.

Pointing to PUB's decision yesterday to conduct monthly checks of drains from now on, rather than the three to six months previously, they said the national water body should carry out a more detailed study and put measures in place that would prevent a recurrence.

Ms Lee Bee Wah, the deputy chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for National Development and Environment, already has plans to raise the issue in Parliament.

Saying that she has already filed a question on the flooding, she added: 'Either the design capacity is not enough, or the drainage system is not well maintained.

'There must be some audits which are lacking. I certainly feel that PUB can do more on maintenance. Although cleaning is outsourced to contractors, the responsibility does not go to the contractor. Ultimately, PUB is still responsible.'

Added Ms Lee, an MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC: 'It's a timely wake-up call. Imagine if it had happened during the Youth Olympic Games, when there are so many visitors in town.

'If they say the debris was swept in by heavy rain, then they've got to look at the design. There should be gratings to trap the rubbish. Whether it's because of heavy rain or because the debris was there, something still needs to be done,' she said.

Mr Cedric Foo, the chairman of the National Development and Environment GPCs, said he was concerned about the impact the flood would have on Singapore's image. He said: 'If such flash floods recur frequently, it will dent Singapore's standing as one of the world's most liveable cities.'

'MEWR (Ministry of Environment and Water Resources) should address the root causes, put in place measures to prevent a recurrence. Perhaps it should trap and extract debris upstream to prevent clogging of the drainage systems,' he added.

Mr Eugene Heng, the founder of Waterways Watch society, a volunteer group which helps clean up Singapore's canals and reservoirs, queried the practice of outsourcing critical maintenance work.

'When it comes to environment and national security, I do not think we should be outsourcing as these companies may not know enough about the situation.'

He added: 'I am surprised by the Orchard Road flooding. If we say our drainage system is good, then we should be prepared for unforeseen circumstances.

'Historical rainfall data is not reliable, given the new circumstances caused by climate change.'

The PUB's plan to install more sensors along the Stamford Canal was also questioned.

Associate Professor Tan Soon Keat, director of the Danish Hydraulic Institute-Nanyang Technological University Water and Environment Research Centre and Education Hub, said sensors may not be the answer, as they only measure the build-up of water.

Responding to such a build-up takes time, and might come too late, he added.

This was the case on Wednesday. By the time sensors showed a sharp spike in water levels along a drain leading to the Stamford Canal, it was too late, and flooding occurred soon after.

Said Prof Tan: 'Regular maintenance and inspection of the drains, particularly after a day or two of dry weather, when leaves and twigs may have covered roadside drains, would help.'

Despite the questions, some experts praised PUB's drainage efforts to date.

Associate Professor Vladan Babovic, director of the Singapore-Delft Water Alliance, a water research centre that brings together experts from the PUB, the National University of Singapore and Dutch water research institute Deltares, defended the national water body's track record.

'PUB does good stuff, considering that Singapore gets four times more rain than England,' said Prof Babovic.

'These freak events where it rains cats and dogs will result in flooding every now and then, but it shows how well PUB does the rest of the time.'

Choked drains caused massive flooding in Orchard Road: PUB
Joanne Chan Channel NewsAsia 17 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE : A choked drain caused the massive flooding in Orchard Road on Wednesday.

This was revealed by Singapore's national water agency, PUB, a day after floods wreaked havoc in the downtown area.

The skies opened and turned parts of Singapore into a muddy river on Wednesday.

Many questions were raised on why Orchard Road bore the brunt, when it has a network in place to manage rainwater.

Investigations found that the downpour led to a heavy build-up of debris trapped in an underground drain known as a "culvert".

Yap Kheng Guan, Director of 3P Network, PUB, said: "The interesting characteristic about this rainfall is that there were two bursts of very heavy, intense rainfall.

"The first peak may well bring in some vegetation and that could have been trapped inside the culvert, and the second peak came along, brought in more vegetation and caused more of the debris to be trapped."

Water from Nassim Road and Cuscaden Road normally flows into two sections of Stamford Canal, which runs along Orchard Road.

But the build-up of debris in the culvert caused the rainwater to be diverted into only one section.

This resulted in rainwater overflowing onto Orchard Road.

After the water had subsided, PUB officers found one-third of the culvert blocked.

PUB maintains that Stamford Canal is able to handle rain of similar intensity.

Mr Yap said: "Over the last two or so years, there were two times when rainfall matched the one that we saw yesterday. There were no flood incidents in the Orchard Road area."

PUB also ruled out the Marina Barrage as the cause of the flood, as the reservoir level was within the normal operating range.

PUB is taking to steps to ensure that such blockages do not occur again.

It will inspect critical closed drains every month, instead of every three to six months.

Debris carried by rainwater flowed through the canal just behind Tanglin Shopping Centre on Wednesday. The mostly-vegetation eventually built up and was trapped in a drain downstream.

To prevent such future blockages, PUB said it will be installing litter traps. It will also be adding sensors to detect any irregular spikes in water levels and this will allow PUB to alert the public in advance.

Wednesday's flood at Orchard Road was the worst since 1984, and losses to businesses there are likely to run into millions of dollars. - CNA/ms

Businesses in Orchard Road hit by floods may take 4-6 weeks to get house in order
Kristine Lim, Lynda Hong Channel NewsAsia 17 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE: Some businesses hit by the flash floods in Orchard Rood may take at least four weeks to get their house in order.

The flash floods are gone but businesses particularly those at Liat Towers are still picking up the pieces.

At fast food outlet Wendy's in Liat Towers, the damage could run up to S$500,000.

Goh Wee Ling, corporate communications manger, Wendy's, said: "We would have to spend some time in re-doing up the outlet because in a way, it is going back to the drawing board. Everything has been affected by the flood. So we got to start from square one and we got to start doing up things again."

The outlet would need at least four weeks before it can re-open.

In the meantime, its 40 employees will be deployed to other outlets in Lau Pa Sat and Jurong Point, which will now open 24-7 during the World Cup Season.

Besides Liat Towers, some shops at Lucky Plaza are also not ready to open.

Steven Goh, director, Orchard Road Business Association, said: "This flood is quite unusual and it's quite unfortunate that it happens once in 25 years. The association is very concerned and we sympathize with those retailers, especially those at Liat Towers and Lucky Plaza. "

The association is also looking at working with the relevant authorities and government agencies on preventive measures. - CNA/vm

Clogged canal caused flash floods, says PUB
Leong Wee Keat Today Online 18 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE - A heavy build-up of debris in an underground drain linked to Stamford Canal has been identified as the likely cause of the flash floods which turned parts of Orchard Road into a lake on Wednesday.

The question is, how long had the debris been trapped there? And with Stamford Canal last upgraded in 1984 and last inspected three months ago, could a more recent check have prevented the flooding?

The canal serves as the main drainage artery, which splits into two underground drains that run down the heart of Orchard Road.

Mr Yap Kheng Guan, PUB director for 3P (public, private and people) Network Department, felt a recent inspection was unlikely to have prevented the flash floods.

He said a short and intense downpour at 9.30am pushed debris down Stamford Canal and trapped it partially in one drain near Delfi Orchard shopping centre.

A second downpour, an hour later, aggravated the situation. Rainwater was then diverted into another drain of the canal, which led to rainwater overflowing near the junction of Scotts and Orchard roads.

A whopping 101mm of rain - about 60 per cent of the normal rainfall in June - fell on Wednesday.

Referring to Wednesday's downpour, Mr Yap told a press conference yesterday: "The inspection can help you to make sure you don't have a build-up of debris. But, in a case like this, it will be very difficult and I think it will be unrealistic to say it will help prevent this kind of thing."

Still, the PUB will now inspect the Stamford Canal once a month - from the current practice of three to six months. It will also install additional debris traps upstream at the open section of drains to prevent the build-up of debris.

PUB's investigations also revealed the Marina Barrage had worked and the water level at the Marina Reservoir was within operating range. The Stamford Canal was also able to handle Wednesday's rainfall, it added.

Meanwhile, affected retailers were still picking up the pieces after the watery mayhem.

At Liat Towers, Starbucks staff threw away a dustbin full of damaged items and removed damp furniture.

Meanwhile, retailers at Lucky Plaza Shopping Centre were busy replacing damaged carpets, drying wet merchandise and borrowing blow-dryers and vacuum cleaners from neighbouring shops.

Mr Mohamed Sihabudeen was perplexed about the drainage system outside the shopping centre as he saw the deluge of rainwater cascading into his basement shop.

He said: "It feels like a disaster and it didn't even rain for a day, but just three to four hours."

Mr Mohamed was among a group of retailers who estimated losses of at least $8,000 - he had only set up shop early this month and failed to get insurance.

When asked yesterday if retailers could approach the national water agency for compensation, PUB's Mr Yap said the authorities' immediate priority is to help affected retailers get back on their feet.

PUB will also install additional sensors along Stamford Canal to monitor unusual spikes or dips in water levels and could trigger SMS alerts to alert those in the Orchard area about an impending flood, Mr Yap said.

But he added: "We have to be realistic ... if you design (drains) for the most extreme storms, we will be probably having a lot of drains, very wide, waiting for the rain to come."

Shoppers grab goods washed away
Sujin Thomas Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

THE ugly side of shoppers surfaced during the Orchard Road flood on Wednesday, when a number of people were seen helping themselves to floating goods in the basement of Lucky Plaza.

Mr Randy Tan, 28, who works at electronics shop Scorpia Xtreme Gaming, said he saw passers-by grabbing items from his shop, such as iPhones and iPads, which were bobbing about in the knee-high water at about 10.30am.

He said: 'There was a sound like an explosion and a gush of water came flowing through and took the items with it.

'Passers-by took everything. I saw someone with a basket happily picking up stuff and also heard another call a friend asking him to come join in,' he added.

The electronic items, estimated to be worth some $10,000, had been displayed on the floor or on low-lying racks.

Mr Tan and two colleagues were powerless as they watched the goods float some 10m away in the direction of the McDonald's restaurant.

Mr Tan said they could do nothing as they needed to save whatever items they could inside the shop first.

Inside McDonald's, Ms Angela Quek, 40, who was having breakfast with a colleague, told The Straits Times that she saw shoppers grabbing hair accessories and perfume boxes, which were floating in the brown water.

A few doors away, fashion accessories shop Sinma also lost a number of items, such as wigs and hair accessories, swept away by the water.

Store supervisor Melissa Gueh said she could not could give an estimate of the cost of the losses.

Nearby, Mr Jeremy Ng, who works at Megatronics Photo, said his shop lost only two or three silicone cases for mobile phones in the second gush of water that flowed through at about noon.

He said: 'We were lucky. There were many other shops that lost a lot more.'

Lawyer Chia Boon Teck said that the taking of such items constitutes criminal misappropriation of property.

He said: 'It's obvious to any passer-by that these items belong to a shop and the act is no different from looting.'

Anyone convicted of the offence can be punished with a maximum of two years' jail and a fine.

Liat Towers' shops still shuttered
It could be weeks before they can reopen, staff say, as damage is severe
Ng Kai Ling & Lim Wei Chean Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

THE big clean-up began in earnest yesterday for Liat Towers stores as owners took stock of the flood damage and accepted that it could be weeks before they can open for business again.

The shutters stayed down at Starbucks, Hermes, Wendy's and Massimo Dutti, probably the worst hit in a deluge on Wednesday that turned parts of Orchard Road into a flowing conduit.

Fast-food restaurant Wendy's had been open for just three days when the flood destroyed everything, including equipment, furniture and fittings, said spokesman Goh Wee Ling.

She said: 'Optimistically, it will take four to six weeks before we can reopen.'

The outlet had cost $500,000 to set up and equipment had to be customised and imported. The bill does not take into account the perishable items destroyed by the flood waters and lost revenue.

Its neighbours were unable to put a figure to the damage as yet but said they were in talks with their insurers.

The flood waters were drained from the area only at about 5pm on Wednesday, by which time, furniture, shelves and fittings had been submerged for about six hours.

At Hermes, contractors were taking measurements to refit the boutique with shelves.

Hermes Singapore's marketing director Madeleine Ho said almost all the merchandise, such as bags, scarves and belts, were saved by staff, who formed a human chain passing the items from the flooded lower floor to the second floor of the store on Wednesday.

But the walls, window displays, furniture and furnishings were badly damaged. Ms Ho said restoration 'will take some time' as a large portion of the fittings has to be imported.

At Starbucks, employees were busily sorting out mugs and flasks that could be salvaged from the muddy premises. Workers were carting away soaked couches and other pieces of damaged furniture.

Starbucks Coffee Singapore's marketing manager Ruth Yam said the damage was 'quite extensive' and the company was taking this as an 'opportunity to elevate the experience for our customers and remodel the store'.

No date was given for the reopening but the store's supervisor Jessie Chan said the clean-up alone would take 'at least' two days.

Mr Tommy Chang from Northwest Interior Design said that to redo a cafe the size of the one at Liat Towers would cost about $60,000 to $70,000 and at least $100,000 to $200,000 for a boutique.

'Fashion boutiques are more troublesome because they have to customise their display with specially-made panels and lighting,' added the design consultant, who has worked on projects with Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf.

At Lucky Plaza, which escaped less scathed, only Watsons and Bossini remained shuttered.

Watsons' senior marketing manager Irene Lau said some 20 workers, contractors and Watsons staff have been working round the clock to replace shelves and fixtures, repaint the walls and repair the flooring to get it ready for reopening tomorrow.

A Bossini spokesman said the store had lost more than $10,000 worth of goods. It is 'trying to get back into business as soon as possible because it is the Great Singapore Sale'.

Associate Professor Qin Xiaosheng, from the Nanyang Technological University's environmental and water resources engineering division, said most buildings are not designed to drain such a large volume of water coming in.

National water agency PUB said yesterday that the flood was caused by a heavy build-up of trapped debris in a culvert which caused a block in the Stamford Canal system.


Getting back on their dry feet again
Staff of shops work hard to get businesses up and running again quickly
Hoe Pei Shan Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

IT WAS back to business yesterday for some of the Orchard Road retailers hit by Wednesday's flash floods.

At the McDonald's outlet in Lucky Plaza, there was no hint of the knee-high muddy water that overwhelmed the basement restaurant.

Instead, the usual morning bustle returned as customers ordered their breakfasts and sat themselves down at spotless tables.

A customer having breakfast with his two young children was astounded when told that the very seat he was in had been almost completely submerged just 24 hours earlier.

'I was aware of the Orchard Road flooding but didn't know this McDonald's outlet had been hit - I can't even tell, it looks like it usually does,' said a 33-year-old delivery man who wanted to be known only as Mr Loo.

A McDonald's spokesman said that a team of about 15 staff worked till 3.30am yesterday morning to get the outlet ready for business.

While repair work was being done, equipment and supplies from other outlets were brought in to replenish what had been washed away or destroyed.

A few doors down, fashion accessories boutique Sinma also showed little signs of being the victim of the most brutal flooding in the Orchard area since 1984.

Staff had removed damaged goods and resumed normal service yesterday morning, while contractors continued to work on fixing destroyed structures, including the back door shutters that had been broken by the rushing water.

Clothing store Giordano's two basement outlets also managed to keep business running while conducting repairs.

Quick thinking by staff of one of the outlets to place merchandise out of harm's way even saw business resume as early as 2pm on the day of the floods, said the store's supervisor Juwanis Wahab.

The 26-year-old added that the severity of the flood was also lessened by opening the store's back door to allow water to escape into the interior of the shopping complex.

In fact, tenants discovered that the layout of the Lucky Plaza basement - where a series of alleyways link the dozens of shops - allows for good flow, of both customers and, in Wednesday's case, water.

Mr Syed Alsagoff, 55, manager of the McDonald's outlet, noted how he and his neighbours fared much better than businesses at Liat Towers just down the road.

Pointing at the ample floor space which helped prevent the water from being trapped, he added: 'Lucky Plaza's building structure is quite different from Liat Towers' - some stores here have both front and back doors, and there are alleyways between shops.'

The other Giordano outlet, which suffered more damage and had to be closed on Wednesday, also succeeded in reopening its doors yesterday morning.

Contractors managed to begin work only at about 1pm yesterday and it was not until past midnight that the mess was cleared and damaged fixtures restored.

More touching up was done at 9am yesterday and business was up and running by 11am.

The only tell-tale sign of any disruption was the absence of music that usually blasts throughout the day - while most of the merchandise had been spared, the Giordano outlet's hi-fi system perished in the flood.

Of the retailers which were hit significantly by the floods, only Bossini and Watsons remained closed. But both outlets said they were doing their best to reopen as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, there was still the usual Orchard Road shopping crowd who seemed almost oblivious to the chaotic scene just a day earlier - they were more interested in grabbing the best bargains from the Great Singapore Sale now on.

Flood mystery solved; retailers pick up the pieces
Culvert near Delfi Orchard blocked up by Botanic Gardens vegetation, litter
Uma Shankari and Felda Chay Business Times 18 Jun 10;

(SINGAPORE) The culprit behind the Orchard Road flash flood that may have caused millions of dollars of damage has been pin-pointed - a drain choked by vegetation at Tanglin.

The enclosed drain, or culvert, near Delfi Orchard diverts water from Nassim and Cuscaden roads into two sections of Stamford Canal which run along Orchard Road.

The heavy build-up of debris (vegetation from the Singapore Botanic Gardens and elsewhere as well as litter) in the culvert caused the heavy rainwater on Wednesday to be diverted into only one section of the canal. The overworked lone canal section then overflowed, causing rainwater to overflow onto Orchard Road, said PUB yesterday.

PUB revealed this after a thorough investigation. The agency will now install more litter traps in the open sections of drains from Singapore Botanic Gardens all the way down to Tanglin to trap debris carried into the drains during a downpour.

More water level sensors will also be installed along Stamford Canal for closer monitoring of unusual water levels.

PUB also said that Stamford Canal's capacity was adequate as the water was not in danger of overflowing after the two canal sections rejoin near Somerset.

Rather, the flood was caused by heavy rain that brought along with it a lot of vegetation, said Yap Kheng Guan, director of the PUB's 3P Network department. The department oversees the strategic communications and community relations efforts for PUB.

'There were two bursts of very heavy, intense rainfall. The first peak may have brought in some vegetation which could have been trapped inside the culvert. And the second peak came along, brought in more vegetation and caused more debris to be trapped.'

Almost 100 mm of rain - more than 60 per cent of the monthly average for June - fell between 9am and 11am on Wednesday. This caused flood water as deep as 30cm deep at the junction of Orchard and Scotts roads, which last saw major flooding in 1984. Businesses may be hit with millions of dollars in damage and lost sales as water seeped into building basements and stores.

Yesterday, affected businesses at badly hit properties such as Lucky Plaza, Liat Towers, Tong Building and Delfi Orchard started taking stock of the damage after water was pumped out on Wednesday.

A few re-opened for business. McDonald's at Lucky Plaza opened its doors to fast food fans at 8.30 am yesterday after clean-up was carried out overnight.

But others remained closed. Fast food restaurant Wendy's said that losses are likely to stand at more than half a million dollars 'from damaged equipment and physical infrastructure, not including perishable items'.

The franchise, operating under the Kopitiam Group here, also said that its other two stores at Lau Pa Sat and Jurong Point would open for 24 hours from today till July 12. It will be deploying staff originally stationed at Liat Towers to Jurong Point, and Lau Pa Sat.

Said Kopitiam managing director Alden Tan: 'We hope to make the best out of a bad situation.'

Hermès, Massimo Dutti and Starbucks said that they were still assessing damage. At Hermès, staff on Wednesday managed to save the French label's luxury goods by quickly forming a human chain and moving the merchandise from the first level to the second.

'But while our products escaped unscathed, the walls, window decoration, furniture and furnishings were badly damaged,' said a spokeswoman. 'Restoration will take some time as a substantial portion of the fittings have to be imported. We are presently in consultation with our insurers. As of now, we cannot confirm when the store will reopen.'

Like Hermès, other affected businesses - and owners of motor vehicles stuck in the floods - are expected to seek some form of compensation. Insurers told BT that claims are filtering in.

'MSIG has received notification of several claims following yesterday's Orchard Road floods. These relate to property and motor vehicle damage,' said a spokeswoman for MSIG Insurance. 'It is too early to estimate the total number of claims we will receive or the estimated payout. This is because those insured who have suffered losses need time to report claims.'


Read more!

Hip Deep on Singapore's Orchard Road

Wrath of Mother Nature and Climate Change?
Lee Poh Onn Asian Sentinel 17 Jun 10;

The June 16 flash flood in Singapore's posh shopping belt area, Orchard Road, has drawn the public's ire and disdain. Suddenly, the popular road was christened "Orchard River" by the local Singapore press.

The question, spurred by concerns over global warming, is whether Singapore is going to have to get used to this.

Flood waters rose by 300 mm; basement car parks, the Orchard underpass, and shops in the vicinity were flooded. Public bus transport was disrupted and diverted for about three hours, while cars were stranded, all causing a public ruckus. Singapore's National Environment Agency reported that 100 mm of rain fell within a two-hour period from about 9 am to 11 am, more than 60 percent of the average monthly rainfall in June each year.

What hit hardest was the fact that the these floods occurred in Singapore's swankiest shopping district, catching not only the attention of the Singapore public but the regional media as well. Orchard Road has all this while been touted as a haven for visiting tourists. So this piece of news came as a great surprise for those familiar with Singapore's shopping attractions.

What caused these floods? Are they becoming a regular occurrence in Singapore and the region?

Questions were called into play regarding the adequacy of the present drainage system, given that the Orchard area has been intensely developed over the past few years. Other possible causes of the flood include the reconstruction of roads after the new Ion Mall was completed, which could also have affected drainage and water flow. Climate change was also identified as another possible factor causing freak floods and the heavy downpour.

To date, the highest rainfall recorded in Singapore over 24 hours was 512 mm in 1978, the second highest was 467 mm in 1969, while the third highest amount of rainfall to drench the island was on 20 December 2006, when 366mm of rain fell over a 24-hour period. Flash floods also occurred in various parts of the island republic in 2007 and 2009, raising the disturbing possibility that such floods are becoming a regular feature.

No human casualties were noted, but retailers have lost millions of dollars in this environmental debacle, though the final amount is yet to be tallied. Back in 1978, when Singapore's worst flood occurred, there were seven deaths, with more than 1,000 people evacuated from their homes. The cost in 1978 dollars was S$10 million.

Action was mobilized by Singapore's national utility agency, the Public Utilities Board (PUB), when rain began in the early hours of the morning. The traffic police were also called into play, and the Singapore Civil Defence helped about 70 people from cars and buses to safety in the Orchard area.

Is the jury out on the link between global warming and climatic extremity? If this is so, what action should the authorities take to deal with these situations?

An Asian Development Bank (ADB) Study conducted in 2009 on the economics of climate change in Southeast Asia may shed some light on the link between global warming and climatic fluctuations. Governments in the region, not only Singapore, are well advised to take note of observations reported in the study. In 2004, the number of tropical depressions, tropical storms, and typhoons recorded in the region was an all time high of 21 reported typhoons, well above the median on 17.5 for the period 1990-2003.

The study also recorded an increase in extreme rains that caused flash floods in Viet Nam, landslides and floods in 1990 and 2004 in the Philippines, and floods in Cambodia in 2000. El Nino events have also become more frequent in Southeast Asia in recent years, with the frequency and intensity of extreme events likely to increase further in the coming decades, the report warns.

The flash floods in Orchard Road were just a small glimpse of the havoc that Mother Nature could inflict on the tiny island state. Measures to further widen and deepen the local drainage network in Orchard, and to prepare a contingency plan to cope with sudden and severe floods may be necessary in the coming months. Already the Stamford Canal and the Marina Reservoir are in place to deal with sudden rises in the water levels.

Public awareness may also need to be raised to deal with sudden disruptions of this nature. The causes of the flood have not been identified but the national utilities agency, PUB, is currently investigating some of the possible causes, including blockages in the local drain network.

Flood water eventually flows back into the sea and all is well again. As the ADB study points out, the more worrying issue for Singapore and other countries in the region is that sea levels are rising due to climate change. Unlike flash floods, sea level rises are permanent and cannot be dissipated easily. Such impacts obviously would be far worse than what flash floods can inflict. In Singapore, the study reported that sea level rise is likely to be close to the global mean of 0.21 to 0.48 meters by the end of this century. This is certainly worrying and the Singapore government has been reported to be exploring the possibility of building dykes in view of this threat.

For other countries in the region like Vietnam, a World Bank policy research paper published in 2007 has reported that for a one-meter rise in sea levels, about 10 percent of Vietnam's GDP and land areas may be wiped out. Again for the same scenario, about 28 percent of Vietnam's wetlands would be affected.

Given the real possibility of greater climatic fluctuations, flash floods, and the likely scenario of rising sea levels in the years to come, the lesson learnt from the Orchard flash floods had better be ingrained in the minds of the public to pay greater attention to the issue of climatic fluctuations and also to global warming.

Lee Poh Onn is a Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. The views expressed are his own.


Read more!

Malaysia's Mangrove Forests - The Forgotten And Abused frontier

Melati Mohd Ariff Bernama 18 Jun 10;

This six-part article dwells on several environmental issues namely global warming, water vitality, ecosystems, biodiversity and Green Economy. This is the third of the series.

KUALA LUMPUR, June 18 (Bernama) -- Global warming and depleting water resources are not the only ones posing threat to life on earth.

The loss of wetlands not only has disrupted the ecological balance but also effectively removed the safety barriers that humankind have failed to appreciate all this while.

The Asian Wetland Symposium held in 2005 in India to assess the damage caused by the December 26, 2004 tsunami noted "certain wetlands played a role in reducing the tsunami impact, especially in locations close to the epicenter, including mangrove swamps that broke the impact of waves and absorbed some of the energy and this protected areas further inland."

Tragically, today the mangrove forests are the world's most threatened tropical ecosystems.

According to United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), about 20 per cent of the world's mangrove forests have disappeared since 1980.

FIRST STRONGHOLD

And the sad part is Malaysia is no exception!

"It is a case of money over everything else," lamented I.S. Shanmugaraj, head of the environmental education division of the Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) in an interview with Bernama recently.

Born and bred in Kuala Selangor, he clearly voiced his grave concern over the state of the mangrove forests in the country despite the current efforts to replant them.

"The catastrophic tsunami has come and gone, but as always we never learn despite the calamity being a dreadful human tragedy.

"The mangrove forests, particularly those in the coastal areas are very important to us. They are our first layer of defense against coastal erosion, against tsunami.

They are our strongholds. What will happen if they are gone?

"You need roughly about 400 metres of mangroves of about 20 to 25 metres high to stop the tsunami waves. The root system of the mangrove trees will break the impact of the waves and the undercurrent.

"Some of the mangroves have also evolved where they can, if you go to Redang or Langkawi or Kuala Sungai Sepang Besar, you can also find them surviving when there are more sand than mud. But despite all these, we are still clearing our mangrove forests," said a clearly disappointed Shanmugaraj.

He said Malaysia had about 570,000 hectares of mangrove cover in year 2000 and currently the size has dwindled to about 70,000 hectares with large areas being cut and cleared in the name of development.

Peninsular Malaysia, he added has about 17 per cent of the country's total mangrove forests and large areas are concentrated in the west coast, particularly in Selangor and Perak.

OTHER RELEVANCE OF MANGROVES

Shanmugaraj speaks with such profound conviction because he grew up amongst the mangrove forests.

His birthplace of Kuala Selangor, located about 60 kilometers north of Kuala Lumpur is famous for the Kuala Selangor Natural Park (KSNP), a significant conservation area for coastal and riverine mangroves.

The mangroves found in KSNP consist mainly of the Bruguiera species mixed with some Rhizophora namely Bakau Kurap, Bakau Minyak and Api-Api.

According to Shanmugaraj, the mangrove areas are a nursery for marine life and serves as a stop over point for migratory birds.

Lying adjacent to the mangrove forest is another crucial ecosystem, namely the mudflats.

"In Kuala Selangor the area right up from Sungai Besar, Sabak Bernam, there are huge mudflats, a natural breeding ground for cockles.

"Besides mudskippers or widely known as ikan belacak, mudflats are also a rich ecosystem for invertebrates including crabs and prawns," he said.

Shanmugaraj who is also a qualified environmental educator spoke on the importance of mangroves in trapping whatever being thrown upstream.

"The main function of mangrove is not trapping rubbish but more of eliminating sediments and toxins," he explained, adding that the mangrove trees are hardy plants as well.

CONTINUED ABUSE

According to Shanmugaraj, Peninsular Malaysia has been losing its mangrove forest over the last twenty years due to illegal activities.

He explained other than sustainable mangrove logging done at the Matang Forest Reserve in Perak, most of the mangrove forests are being over exploited for wood-based industries, particularly for charcoal production and also for aquaculture activities.

As a result of the unscrupulous and excessive clearings, the mangrove belt is getting thin both on the west and east coast of Peninsular.

A lot of mangrove forests are being cleared to make way for prawn aqua culture in Perak, Selangor, Terengganu and Kedah even after the tsunami, said Shanmugaraj.

"By opening prawn aqua culture, you are destroying the mangroves because chemical used in the farms will make the soil acidic for the mangrove trees to survive.

"Some of the prawn breeding ventures were either abandoned or have failed.

In some areas, you hardly can see mangrove trees growing around that aqua culture area. So these are the things we sometimes forget and only realise when the ecosystem has been destroyed," he said.

Even at KSNP's boundary, Shanmugaraj said a large tract of mangrove forest has been cleared to make way for prawn aqua culture to cater for the export market.

MANGROVE AWARENESS

Shanmugaraj acknowledged the efforts taken by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) in replanting mangroves under the National Mangrove Replanting Programme after the tsunami.

The exercise covered the whole of Malaysia and even the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) has been enlisted to find new ways to plant the mangrove trees in places that are hard to grow.

Shanmugaraj told Bernama, several non-governmental organisations including MNS are also actively involved in rolling out educational programmes for local communities and children, stressing on the importance of mangroves.

"We get funding from MNRE through the Forestry Department. It is a yearly funding to educate people on the importance of mangroves and MNS currently has two centers for these ongoing educational programmes," he said, adding that the two centers, one at KSNP and at the other MNS Eco Care Project, in Kerteh.

As for MNS Eco Care Project in Kerteh, the project involves three villages, namely Kampung Gelugor, Kampung Telaga Papan and Kampung Tengah as they are located in the mangrove belt along Sungai Kerteh.

With funds from the Optimal Group of Companies (a 10-year commitment up to 2020), MNS will be setting up an education center at a site of about a hectare, formerly a mangrove forest area near Kampung Gelugor, to be gazetted by the state government as the "Nature Education Centre".

According to Shanmugaraj, the Kerteh Centre will become a focus point in educating on the importance of biodiversity including the mangroves.

SOME FAILURES

Nevertheless, there were some mangrove replanting programmes at several places hit by the 2004 tsunami that did not work out due to the strong currents that washed away the mangrove saplings.

"MNS worked on a place in the Kuala Muda area in Kedah, that was badly hit by the tsunami. We brought school children and planted over 2,000 saplings but all were wiped out because of the strong current. The place has now turned into a mudflat.

"It will take a few more years for the mangrove trees to grow back naturally," said Shanmugaraj who has been with MNS for the last 16 years.

Over the years he has witnessed the destruction of the mangrove forests.

"It is sad to see our forests disappearing especially the mangrove forests and beaches. Whatever people throw upstream is all ending up on the public beach. It is even difficult to go for a swim in these beaches. One good example is Port Dickson.

"We are actually destroying our own future. I don't know whether the future generation can still swim in clear, crystal water or can they see corals anymore?

"Even now when we bring the urban kids for our environment programmes and they see the mangrove trees, the crabs, the prawns and the fish. Some of them are seeing them for the first time in their natural habitat," he added.

-- BERNAMA


Read more!

Yudhoyono needs to walk the green talk

Bruce Gale, Straits Times 18 Jun 10;

PRESIDENT Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is known for his impassioned speeches in support of the environment at international forums. Indonesia's President has also made some heady promises, including a pledge last year to cut his country's carbon emissions by up to 40 per cent by 2020. His record at home, however, has been patchy, with conservationists questioning the extent to which he regards environmental issues as a priority.

Last month, Dr Yudhoyono sought to put all this behind him. On May 26, he signed an agreement in Oslo with the Norwegian government that required Indonesia to stop converting primary forests and peatlands into oil palm plantations for two years. In return, Norway undertook to provide the country with US$1 billion (S$1.4 billion) in compensation.

Deforestation and peatland conversion is widely acknowledged to be a major cause of greenhouse gas emissions. But not everyone is impressed with the agreement, which is being implemented as a result of a deal reached at the Copenhagen climate talks in December last year.

The Indonesian Environmental Forum, for example, wants the pact to include logging.

Critics are also wary of loopholes. A presidential decree in March allowing mining, power plant, transport and renewable energy projects (especially geothermal ones) in protected forests has already sparked controversy. Mining activities in Kalimantan were in the spotlight earlier this year, following reports that almost 200 mining concessionaires were operating in conservation areas and causing massive environmental destruction.

Meanwhile, an ambitious plan to turn 1.6 million hectares of fertile land in the eastern-most region of Papua into an enormous food estate has raised concerns about forest destruction and the marginalisation of small farmers. Coordinating Minister for the Economy Hatta Radjasa insists the project will not damage the environment. Only scrubland, he says, will be converted. Environmentalists, however, remain unconvinced.

The battle between environmental concerns and the demands of developers is obvious. About 36 local and foreign companies have expressed interest in the US$6 billion project, which is expected to produce 1 million tonnes of rice and 800,000 to 1.2 million tonnes of sugar annually.

But it is not simply the limited scope of the moratorium that has been challenged. The economics of the idea has also come under fire. Greenomics, a local environmentalist study group, says the proposed two-year moratorium could prevent the conversion of some 1.97 million hectares of natural forest and peatland but it warned that the compensation offered by Norway was too small. Greenomics executive director Elfian Effendi says studies by his organisation suggest that Indonesia would need at least US$7.5 billion in financial compensation to stop the conversion of just 1.48 million hectares of natural forest and peatland.

The government, he charges, failed to make accurate economic calculations before agreeing to the two-year moratorium.

Mr Effendi may well be right. 'I don't know exactly when the idea of the moratorium began and why it should be in two years. I have never heard discussions in Jakarta before (the Oslo meeting),' Mr Haryadi Himawan, a senior official at the Forestry Ministry, told the media last week.

The lack of planning is also evidenced in reports that the agreement has forced officials to delay a much-awaited regulation on peatland protection. The current draft, created to implement the 2009 environmental law, reportedly allows companies to utilise peatland areas that are under 3m deep. The Oslo pact is likely to result in a presidential decree tightening these conditions.

Many plantations operate on peatland, and it is likely that they are now engaged in intensive lobbying regarding the implications of the policy change. 'The palm oil industry should be well protected by the government due to its significant contribution to the country's non-oil and gas exports,' secretary-general of the Indonesian Palm Oil Association Joko Supriyono told the Jakarta Post earlier this month.

The extent that Dr Yudhoyono bows to such pressure will be closely watched. He has already pledged to personally monitor the way the moratorium is implemented by local administrations.

The agreement with Oslo calls for Jakarta to establish a powerful agency similar to the highly successful Aceh Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency (BRR) to oversee the billion-dollar fund. Selecting former BRR chairman Kuntoro Mangkusubroto, who now runs the President's Delivery Unit for Development Monitoring and Oversight, would send a strong signal that Dr Yudhoyono is serious.

Even so, environmentalist groups are well aware that progress will be an uphill battle. The 2009 environment law required strong support from conservationist groups to ensure its passage through Parliament.

A similar battle with vested interests can be expected when it comes to this latest attempt to deal with Indonesia's environmental problems.


Read more!

Call for strong action to prevent bycatch in the Coral Triangle

Desy Nurhayati, The Jakarta Post 18 Jun 10;

Fishers from local communities and private companies in the Coral Triangle region have called for a stronger partnership and collaborative measures to prevent the unintended capture of animals in commercial fishing gear.

A three-day forum, which closed here Thursday, discussed ways to prevent the phenomenon, which in the industry is known as “bycatching”. The forum heard that millions of marine animals were inadvertently killed every year by the fisheries industry in the Coral Triangle.

Bycatching is a major cause of death of endangered species, such as turtles, sharks, marine mammals, as well as thousands of tons of fish species that are not eaten that get entangled in fishing gear each year, the forum heard.

“Such ineffective fishing practices are undoubtedly depleting our highly valuable marine species on which millions of people depend for food and income,” said Keith Symington, bycatch strategy leader of the coral triangle program at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).

“This forum has created a collaborative platform for fishers to start working closely together to solve bycatching and secure a more sustainable and equitable future for the fishing industry in this region,” he said.

The forum was jointly held by the WWF, the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Ministry and the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC).

Some 100 participants at the forum collectively agreed on a set of recommendations, including mainstreaming bycatching regulations in regional legislation and implementing them into national policies, as well as providing incentives to fishermen to turn to more environmentally friendly catching methods.

Other recommendations included conducting more research and studies to inform decisions on policy.

The forum also agreed to establish partnerships with academic institutions and fisheries schools to raise awareness about bycatching among new fishermen.

“It is urgent for fishers in this region to transform their practices into more eco-friendly ones and cooperate with key players across the entire supply-chain to ensure the health of ocean resources and the future of their business as well,” Symington said.

Narmoko Prasmadji, the ministry’s representative and the executive secretary of the national coordination committee of Coral Triangle Initiative Indonesia, said the ministry would support a plan of action arrived at during the meeting in line with its own policy of reducing bycatching.

“The bycatching issue should be included in the mainstream of the national fisheries policy and should be well implemented and legally enforced,” he said.

The SEAFDEC noted that many fishing operations were guilty of bycatching, with many simply throwing unwanted dead catches back into the sea.

Some shrimp trawling operations can discard up to 90 percent of their catches, while some fishing
operations kill seabirds, turtles and dolphins, sometimes in large numbers.

The Ministry’s Center for Analysis and International Cooperation estimated that 15 percent of every 5-ton catch was bycatch, while the FAO estimated commercial fishing wasted at least 27 tons of marine resources every year due to indiscriminate fishing.

Since 2006, WWF Indonesia and the ministry have initiated a bycatch mitigation program that requires the use of circle hooks for long-line tuna fishing in harbors in Benoa in Bali and Bitung in North Sulawesi.


Read more!

Illegal bushmeat 'rife in Europe'

Mark Kinver, BBC News 17 Nov 10;

About 270 tonnes of illegal bushmeat could be passing through one of Europe's busiest airports each year, the first study of its kind estimates.

A team of researchers says the illicit trade could pose a risk to human or animal health and increase the demand for meat from threatened species.

The figure is based on seizures from searches carried out over 17 days at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris.

The findings appear in the journal Conservation Letters.

A team of researchers from France, Cambodia and the UK said it was the "first systematic study of the scale and nature of this international trade".

"We estimate that about five tonnes of bushmeat per week is smuggled in personal baggage through Paris Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport," they wrote.

During the 17-day study, a total of 134 passengers arriving on 29 flights from 14 African nations were searched.

Nine people were found to be carrying bushmeat, which had a combined mass of 188kg.

In total, 11 species were found - including two types of primates, two kinds of crocodiles and three rodent species - four of which were listed as protected species.
'Lucrative trade'

Co-author Marcus Rowcliffe from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) explained why the international team of researchers decided to carry out the research.

"As no study like this had been carried out before, we really had no idea as to the volume of bushmeat coming into airports," he told BBC News.

"It was a surprise when we saw how much was arriving."

The products were not only imported for personal consumption, but were part of a lucrative organised trade with high prices indicating luxury status, Dr Rowcliffe added.

"A 4kg monkey will cost around 100 euros (£84), compared with just five euros in Cameroon," he said.

Based on the data gathered from the 29 flights covered by the study, the researchers then calculated the weekly and annual inward flow of bushmeat.

"Assuming that (the study's) rates are representative of the average weekly rate over the year, this equates to... 273 tonnes of bushmeat," they calculated.

The team suggested that there were likely to be a number of factors behind the large volume of bushmeat being imported.

"First, detecting and seizing these products is not a priority," they explained.

"Second, penalties for importing illegal meat or fish are low and rarely imposed. Third, the rewards for transporting bushmeat are potentially high."

The researchers acknowledged that the study had a short time scale and limited geographical coverage, and said that a longer and large scale survey was now required to build on the findings.

However, they added that their study did allow them to consider ways to control the trade.

They suggest offering incentives to customs officers, increasing the penalties for illegally importing the products and raising awareness among passengers that bringing such products into the EU was prohibited.

The team concluded: "The large scale of current imports makes it important to consider all options for reducing the flow of illegal meat and fish, and of bushmeat in particular."

Illegal bushmeat trade rife in Europe
Zoological Society of London EurekAlert 17 Jun 10;

More than five tonnes of illegal bushmeat is being smuggled in personal luggage each week through one of Europe's busiest airports, reveals new research published in Conservation Letters today.

Working alongside customs officials at France's Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport, researchers from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), The Royal Veterinary College (RVC) and The National Veterinary School and the Natural History Museum of Toulouse identified eleven bushmeat species from confiscated luggage, including species of primate, crocodiles and pangolins.

This study quantifies for the first time the illegal trade of bushmeat through a European airport.

134 passengers were searched from 29 flights over a period of 17 days. The single largest confiscation was of 51kg of bushmeat carried by a single passenger with no other luggage.

"Our results estimate that around 270 tonnes of potentially contaminated illegal bushmeat is passing unchecked through a single European airport per year, posing a huge potential risk to public health," says lead author Dr Anne-Lise Chaber, from ZSL and the RVC.

The Central African Republic, Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo were identified as the main sources of bushmeat. The researchers conducted conversations with three traders in Paris revealing that, as well as street trading, traders take orders in advance and arrange delivery of the goods to the customer.

Co-author Dr Marcus Rowcliffe from ZSL says: "Our results show that this is a lucrative, organised trade feeding into a luxury market; a 4kg monkey will cost around €100 in France, compared with just €5 in Cameroon."

He adds: "Importing bushmeat is relatively easy as customs officials are given no financial incentives to uncover illegal meat imports, compared with the bonuses they're awarded for drug and counterfeit seizures. Also, penalties are very low for people caught carrying illegal meat."

39 per cent of the confiscated bushmeat was identified as being listed under the Convention for the Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), highlighting the unsustainable nature of the trade and its potential impact on species of conservation concern.

In addition to wildlife conservation concerns, the illegal trade of such large quantities of bushmeat raises serious questions about the importation of pathogens into Europe.

"Surveillance methods need to be more robust and deterrents more severe if we're to have any chance of halting this illegal trade," says co-author Dr Andrew Cunningham, from ZSL.

This is the first systematic study of the volume and nature of the international bushmeat trade. The researchers now wish to undertake a wider-scale study with greater geographic coverage to determine the overall volume of the illegal bushmeat trade into Europe.

###

Editorial Notes

* Bushmeat is a term originating in West and Central Africa meaning the meat of wild animals.

* The research paper, The scale of illegal meat importation from Africa to Europe via Paris (DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00121.x) is published online in Conservation Letters on Friday 18 May.

* Founded in 1826, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is an international scientific, conservation and educational charity: our key role is the conservation of animals and their habitats. The Society runs ZSL London Zoo and ZSL Whipsnade Zoo, carries out scientific research at the Institute of Zoology and is actively involved in field conservation overseas. For further information please visit www.zsl.org

* The Royal Veterinary College (RVC) is the UK's first and largest veterinary school and a constituent College of the University of London. It also provides support for veterinary and related professions through its three referral hospitals, diagnostic services and continuing professional development courses. For further information please visit www.rvc.ac.uk

* The National Veterinary School and the Natural History Museum of Toulouse date back to 1828 and 1865, respectively. The former was founded to support agricultural development in south-western France, the latter to house collections gathered by the Academy of Sciences of Toulouse, local travellers and early prehistorians. After a 9 year closure, the Musem reopened in 2008 in a new configuration, re-focused on the relations between man and the environment, with research and teaching in palaeontology, biological anthropology and human ecology. Further information please visit http://www.museum.toulouse.fr/index.php?lang=fr; http://www.anthropobiologie.cict.fr/accueil.html


Read more!

Coffee baron's bid to save Australia's dugongs

Daniel Bateman The Cairns Post 18 Jun 10;

A COFFEE baron has vowed to support a dugong count to find out how many of the endangered mammals are still left in the wild.

Traditional owners, conservationists and the Opposition are lobbying State and Federal governments to temporarily halt traditional hunting of dugongs and sea turtles.

Zarrafas founder Kenton Campbell will be in Cairns next week to speak to animal activists about the issue.

Mr Campbell, who also founded the Gold Coast-based conservation group Ecoforce, said he backed the call for a moratorium for the activity "100 per cent".

"It’s just not right and it needs to stop," he said.

However, there needed to be an accurate count of the animals to determine how many were still left in the wild.

Dugongs are listed as vulnerable species in Queensland's waters with some scientists believing dugong numbers to have been decimated by as much as 95 per cent over a 50-year period.

"That’s something I would certainly put my hand up for, even just to be part of that (survey) personnel," Mr Campbell said.

"I think it’s something that really needs to be done, so we know where we’re at."

The RSPCA has also backed the call for a 12-month moratorium on dugong and turtle killing, saying traditional methods are "inherently cruel".

RSPCA assistant chief inspector Tracey Jackson said it would at least give a temporary reprieve for the animals.

"There is no doubt that some of the traditional methods used are inherently cruel and, in this day and age, basically unnecessary."

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority says there is no legislative basis for imposing a moratorium on traditional hunting of dugong and sea turtles.

A GBRMPA spokeswoman said the authority supported traditional use and recognised the important role it played in customs of traditional owners within the marine park.


Read more!

Oceans choking on CO2, face deadly changes: study

Michael Perry, Reuters 18 Jun 10;

SYDNEY (Reuters) - The world's oceans are virtually choking on rising greenhouse gases, destroying marine ecosystems and breaking down the food chain -- irreversible changes that have not occurred for several million years, a new study says.

The changes could have dire consequences for hundreds of millions of people around the globe who rely on oceans for their livelihoods.

"It's as if the Earth has been smoking two packs of cigarettes a day", said the report's lead-author Australian marine scientist Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg.

The Australia-U.S. report published in Science magazine on Friday, studied 10 years of marine research and found that climate change was causing major declines in marine ecosystems.

Oceans were rapidly warming and acidifying, water circulation was being altered and dead zones within the ocean depths were expanding, said the report.

There has also been a decline in major ocean ecosystems like kelp forests and coral reefs and the marine food chain was breaking down, with fewer and smaller fish and more frequent diseases and pests among marine organisms.

"If we continue down this pathway we get into conditions which have no analog to anything we've experienced," said Hoegh-Guldberg, director of the Global Change Institute at The University of Queensland.

Hoegh-Guldberg said oceans were the Earth's "heart and lungs", producing half of the world's oxygen and absorbing 30 percent of man-made carbon dioxide.

"We are entering a period in which the very ocean services upon which humanity depends are undergoing massive change and in some cases beginning to fail," said Hoegh-Guldberg.

"Quite plainly, the Earth cannot do without its ocean. This is further evidence that we are well on the way to the next great extinction event."

More than 3.5 billion people depend on the ocean for their primary source of food and in 20 years this number could double, the report's authors say.

The world's climate has remained stable for several thousand years, but climate change in the past 150 years is now forcing organisms to change rapidly -- changes that through evolution would normally take a long time, said the report.

"We are becoming increasingly certain that the world's marine ecosystems are approaching tipping points. These tipping points are where change accelerates and causes unrelated impacts on other systems," said co-author marine scientist John F. Bruno at the University of North Carolina.

Last week, the head of the United Nations Environment Program, Achim Steiner, said it was crucial the world responded to the loss of coral reefs, forests and other ecosystems "that generate multi-trillion dollar services that underpin all life-including economic life-on Earth".

(Reporting by Michael Perry; Editing by David Fogarty)

Ocean changes may have dire impact on people
Global Change Institute, EurekAlert 17 Jun 10

The first comprehensive synthesis on the effects of climate change on the world's oceans has found they are now changing at a rate not seen for several million years.

In an article published today in Science magazine, scientists reveal the growing atmospheric concentrations of man-made greenhouse gases are driving irreversible and dramatic changes to the way the ocean functions, with potentially dire impacts for hundreds of millions of people across the planet.

The findings of the report, "The impact of climate change on the world's marine ecosystems" emerged from a synthesis of recent research on the world's oceans, carried out by two of the world's leading marine scientists, one from The University of Queensland in Australia, and one from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in the USA.

Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, lead author of the report and Director of The University of Queensland's Global Change Institute, says the findings have enormous implications for mankind, particularly if the trend continues.

He said that the Earth's ocean, which produces half of the oxygen we breathe and absorbs 30% of human-generated CO2, is equivalent to its heart and lungs. "Quite plainly, the Earth cannot do without its ocean. This study, however, shows worrying signs of ill health.

"It's as if the Earth has been smoking two packs of cigarettes a day!"

He went on to say, "We are entering a period in which the very ocean services upon which humanity depends are undergoing massive change and in some cases beginning to fail", says Prof. Hoegh-Guldberg. "Further degradation will continue to create enormous challenges and costs for societies worldwide."

He warned that we may soon see "sudden, unexpected changes that have serious ramifications for the overall well-being of humans," including the capacity of the planet to support people. "This is further evidence that we are well on the way to the next great extinction event."

The "fundamental and comprehensive" changes to marine life identified in the report include rapidly warming and acidifying oceans, changes in water circulation and expansion of dead zones within the ocean depths.

These are driving major changes in marine ecosystems: less abundant coral reefs, sea grasses and mangroves (important fish nurseries); fewer, smaller fish; a breakdown in food chains; changes in the distribution of marine life; and more frequent diseases and pests among marine organisms.

Report co-author, Dr John F. Bruno, an Associate Professor at The University of North Carolina, says greenhouse gas emissions are modifying many physical and geochemical aspects of the planet's oceans, in ways "unprecedented in nearly a million years". "This is causing fundamental and comprehensive changes to the way marine ecosystems function," Dr Bruno said.

"We are becoming increasingly certain that the world's marine ecosystems are approaching tipping points. These tipping points are where change accelerates and causes unrelated impacts on other systems, the results of which we really have no power or model to foresee."

The authors conclude: "These challenges underscore the urgency with which world leaders must act to limit further growth of greenhouse gases and thereby reduce the risk of these events occurring. Ignoring the science is not an option."

In their study, the researchers sought to address a gap in previous studies that have often overlooked the affects of climate change on marine ecosystems, due to the fact that they are complex and can be logistically difficult to study.

According to leading US marine scientist, the University of Maine's School of Marine Services Professor Robert S. Steneck, the study provides a valuable indicator of the ecological risk posed by climate change, particularly to coastal regions.

"While past studies have largely focused on single global threats such as 'global warming', Hoegh-Guldberg and Bruno make a compelling case for the cumulative impacts of multiple planet-scale threats," Prof. Steneck said.

###

Further information:

Images: http://gci.uq.edu.au/ScienceJune2010


Read more!