Best of our wild blogs: 15 Mar 10


ICCS 2010 Team and Recruitment
from News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore

Do you have a passion for nature and the environment?
from Toddycats!

Ringed sap-sucking slug
from wonderful creation

Hornbill figs out at Chek Jawa
from wild shores of singapore and Chek Jawa with Omnitoons

苹果螺 apple snail
from PurpleMangrove

The Swans of Singapore Botanic Gardens
from Biodiversity Singapore

Exploring Intertidal Hantu with Dr. Dan and students from Duke
from Pulau Hantu

Birding in Singapore and the challenges of the 21st century
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Monday Morgue: 15th March 2010
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales


Read more!

Tuna fishing: The fairest catch

Traditional tuna fishing in the Maldives uses pole and line rather than nets. Rose Prince joined a crew for a day’s fishing on the Indian Ocean.
Rose Prince, The Telegraph 11 Mar 10;

In those first moments when the fishermen spot the unmistakable signs of a tuna shoal, everything changes. The inky entity that is the Indian Ocean suddenly reveals the life beneath its surface. Yellowfin tuna, the third largest in the tuna family after bluefin and big eye, are usually accompanied by dolphins. We see their dark backs curving in and out of the water about 100 yards away, and the boat turns towards them. Birds are also circling the area, another sure indication that there are tuna below.

On the 90ft dhoni (fishing boat) manned by 17 fishermen, led by skipper or 'keyolhu’ Adam Mohammed, there is a rush of activity. Live bait – trigger fish, sprats and mackerel, plus some unfamiliar fish local to the Maldives – are scooped out from a large tank beneath the boat, hooked on each fisherman’s line and dropped over the side. There are no rods or reels. The fishermen don gloves and rubber socks. If a fish is caught, it will be pulled in by hand and killed when rolled on to the boat. But this morning there’s no need. The yellowfin are not biting.

We had left Hanimadhoo harbour at 6am searching for both yellowfin and the smaller species, skipjack. Hanimadhoo Island is in the undeveloped far north, an hour’s flight from the capital, Male, and nearby coral islands with their paradise hotels and incumbent honeymoon couples. But it shares an extreme beauty – the astonishing turquoise of the shallow lagoons, white sand and green coconut palms. Many islands in this area are uninhabited or devoted to boat-building and fish-processing.

Tuna itself is revered by the Maldivian people. Skipjack is eaten with every meal, either salted and dried (known as 'Maldives fish’) or curried. It is the islands’ only plentiful source of animal protein, and along with coconut one of the few foods the country produces. The 1,192 islands of the Maldives amount to only about 180 square miles of land, little of which can be cultivated. Most of the islands’ food is imported.

There are two Maldivian fishery bosses on board the dhoni: Nashid Rafeeu of Big Fish, and Yasir Waheed from Cyprea Marine Foods. 'The yellowfin and skipjack tuna fisheries are integral to the Maldives,’ Waheed says. 'It is a tradition passed down through families; we have never changed the way we fish: on lines with live bait.’ There is much to protect; fishing represents 30 per cent of industry here. Hi-tech methods, which damage fish stocks, have never been permitted within the 200-mile exclusion zone around the island, protecting its resources.

I had travelled to the Maldives with the British seafood importer Fred Stroyan and Paul Willgoss, the technical director of Marks & Spencer. Stroyan supplies the chain’s food halls with fresh yellowfin tuna, and M&S also sources canned Maldivian skipjack tuna. Willgoss oversees 68 of the 100 M&S 'Plan A’ initiatives for sustainability, which include recycling waste, ethical trading and animal welfare, plus a sustainable sourcing policy for fish. In 2009 M&S was the first British company to sign up to the World Wildlife Fund’s seafood charter, committing to source all seafood sustainably by 2012 – so far the chain has a good record, sourcing white fish, organic tiger prawns, gurnard and MSC-certified wild Alaskan salmon. Plan A’s objective is a very tall order, watched with much interest by other chains, environment experts and the fishing industry.

The involvement with Fred Stroyan’s company, New England Seafood International (NESI), is a wise one. Stroyan, a keen fisherman himself, has 10 years’ experience working with sustainable fisheries and importing to Britain, notably fresh tuna (since 2003) and MSC-certified wild Alaskan salmon. 'I had seen what happened with UK and European fish stocks,’ says Stroyan, who spends more than five months a year visiting fisheries that supply NESI. 'Being a fisherman myself I was passionate about this and we have always worked in tuna fishing areas that are artisanal. It is always better-quality fish as a result.’

Tuna made headlines last year with the release of the film The End of the Line. Its focus was on the safety of the bluefin, the favourite sashimi and sushi fish of the Japanese. Bluefin is classed as endangered. At the time some press reports implied that all tuna were bluefin, canned, in sushi, in sandwiches. But this tuna is almost always skipjack or yellowfin, both available from sustainable sources.

Yellowfin is the viable alternative to fresh bluefin. Reaching weights of up to 440lb, yellowfin are found in all tropical and subtropical waters, but not in the Mediterranean. The appetite for fresh tuna in Western countries has encouraged fishermen to hunt using hi-tech methods that are not permitted in the Maldives. Most notorious are the purse seine nets, up to three miles long, used to encircle and 'bag up’ huge numbers of fish.

'It can take up to three hours to draw in a purse seine net,’ says Cesar Basalo, who audits the quality of fish for NESI. 'The fishing boats pull the net tighter and tighter, crowding the fish, which will be fighting on top of each other. Some die as they fight; the surface water will be red with blood and full of floating body parts.’

'It is pretty horrific when hundreds of tons are caught, and these boats are capable of doing this three or four times in a day,’ Stroyan says. This method is also indiscriminate, killing more than one species. Such fishing results in tuna of a much lower grade. 'Tuna must be killed quickly or they produce lactic acid in the muscle,’ Basalo says. 'The meat turns brown with a rainbow sheen and cooked appearance.’ In the international waters outside the protected fishing grounds, a bizarre protection from the purse seiners has sprung up in the form of Somali pirates, renowned kidnappers and boat thieves.

Yasir Waheed and Nashid Rafeeu run separate fishing companies but work together and are also good friends. They share processing facilities in the Maldives and operate boats. The dhoni are low and wide, built from fibreglass, with a vast tank underneath to carry the live bait. The water inside the dhoni gives the vessel an uncomfortable gait and it rocks like a moving hula-hoop on the Indian Ocean. We are 15 miles offshore, not an atoll in sight. We had breakfast shortly after leaving; a dish made by the fishermen containing grated coconut, cooked skipjack, lime and chilli, served with roti (flatbreads) and hard-boiled eggs. It was one of the most delicious tuna dishes, and breakfasts, I have had.

There is a shoal of skipjack ahead and two boats have already arrived on the scene. In the Maldives, the smaller skipjack are caught by a different method to the large yellowfin: pole and line. As the boat slows the fishermen gather at the back of the boat and turn two water sprays on the water’s surface. Two of the crew begin to throw bucketfuls of live sprats over a wide area. 'They are creating a feeding frenzy,’ Stroyan says, picking up a 12ft bamboo pole with a small barb-less hook and a feather attractor. When the fish, confused by all the activity in the water, bite, the fishermen yank the poles over their shoulders and the fish, not more than 12-20in long, slip off the hooks and are flicked on to the boat. Each time the poles are lowered back into the water, more fish bite. 'They could fish here for hours, catch several tons of fish and still make an impact on only 10 per cent of the shoal,’ Stroyan says.

Our day ends without the sight of a fisherman playing a yellowfin on his hand line, testament to the minimal impact of fisheries on the tuna population. There are mutterings about women bringing bad luck to boats, but forgiveness when the crew settles down on the journey back to sing, drumming water bottles. 'They are singing about their wives, who are unfaithful when they are away,’ Rafeeu says.

On the landing stage of another island with a processing plant, a skipper waits in suspense as 20 yellowfin are taken from his boat’s ice boxes, then weighed, temperature-tested and graded. Basalo inserts a sashibo, a slim tool that takes a sample of flesh. 'Clarity and good colour earn the fish an A or B grade; a fish that has not been landed quickly, which has lactic acid in the flesh, is a C. The flesh will be like this one, opaque and pale,’ he says. Fishermen are paid less for low-grade fish – one third of the full price. C-grade fish are rejected for the British market.

'In the Maldives the methods are sustainable but more care is needed when landing the fish on the boats. It needs to be done quickly, yet not change the tradition of hand-lining.’ Stroyan is keen to see the introduction of electronic reels to the Maldives, to boost the number of fish they can export. 'This is very important, it means they can bring in a fish without a struggle and it will be on ice in no time.’

The quality fish are divided into loins inside a state-of-the-art, well-scrubbed plant. Vacuum-packed, they are dispatched to Britain via BA passenger planes – returning honeymooners sit above next week’s tuna niçoise. 'Fish that is caught on a Wednesday will be in M&S stores within four days,’ Stroyan says, 'and all is traceable back to the boat.’ He estimates he is now bringing 700 tons of yellowfin from the Maldives each year.

The British market has become essential to the Maldivian economy. This is the cottage industry that grew up. 'The Maldives have an opportunity to become iconic in the way they manage their fishing,’ Paul Willgoss says. 'It is up to us to help them increase their returns and take the earnings back to the people of these islands.’


Read more!

Tuna, tuskers, tigers headline wildlife trade meet

Anne Chaon Yahoo News 13 Mar 10;

DOHA (AFP) – Atlantic bluefin tuna is in crisis and meets the criteria for a total ban on international trade, the head of the UN wildlife trade organisation said on Saturday in opening a 13-day meeting.

The 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), convening for the first time in the Middle East, is the only UN body with the power to outlaw commerce in endangered wild animals and plants.

Besides the sharply disputed proposal on bluefin, the Convention will debate the status of African elephants, polar bears and tigers.

Delegates from the nearly 150 nations in attendance will also vote on less stringent protection for several types of shark and their lookalikes.

Up to 73 million of the open-water predators are killed every year for their fins, a prestige food eaten mainly in China and Chinese communities around the world.

Boosting the CITES budget -- at less than five million dollars (3.6 million euros) the smallest of the major UN conventions -- is the first item on the agenda.

"In the absence of necessary funding, CITES will not be able to fully exploit its great potential," Secretary General Willem Wijnstekers said in an opening statement.

Until now, the forum was best known for measures restricting commerce in charismatic species, including big cats, great apes and elephants.

But for the first time a marine species -- bluefin tuna -- has taken centre stage.

Despite self-imposed quotas, high-tech fisheries have drained tuna stocks in the Mediterranean and Western Atlantic by as much as 80 percent since 1970.

"The secretariat believes the species (Thunnus thynnus) meets the criteria for Appendix I" of the convention, Wijnstekers said.

This conclusion, he added, "has been confirmed by the Food and Agriculture Organisation and the scientific committee of the ICCAT," the inter-governmental fishery group that manages tuna stocks in the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas.

The European Union and the United States back a move to list the 100,000-dollar-a-head fish on CITES' Appendix I, which bans international trade.

Top consumer Japan is fiercely opposed to the measure, and is sure to mount a vigorous campaign to block the two-thirds vote of those attending the conference needed for the top tier of protection, experts say.

On elephants, a proposal by Tanzania and Zambia would reopen trade in ivory, currently under a nine-year moratorium that started in 2008.

Most other African nations oppose the move, backing a competing measure that would extend the ban by another decade.

Polar bears are also being considered for the top level of protection.

Attended by environmentalists, animal rights advocates, big business and governments, CITES seeks a sustainable balance between protection and commercial exploitation.

Terrestrial flora and fauna have fallen victim to shrinking habitats, hunting and over-harvesting.

Many ocean species have simply been eaten to the brink of viability.

"We have nearly 34,000 species placed under our protection. You need scientific studies, legislation, enforcement, training for customs police, capacity building," said Juan Carlos Vasquez of CITES in pleading for a 16-percent budget boost.

Animals and plants are listed on three levels according to the degree of protection they need.

APPENDIX I covers about 530 animals -- including tigers, great apes, snow leopards and sea turtles -- and more than 300 plants.

The vast majority of species covered are in APPENDIX II, which permits carefully regulated trade.

Pink and red coral, harvested mainly in the Mediterranean for jewellery, is again up for this status after failing to gain it in 2007.

Several hundred APPENDIX III species are protected by national laws.

Separately, the forum will consider a resolution to condemn tiger farming, practised only in China.

Bluefin tuna tops CITES conference agenda in Doha
Michael Casey, Associated Press 13 Mar 10;

DOHA, Qatar – A contentious battle between Asia and the West over the fate of the Atlantic bluefin tuna prized by sushi lovers overshadowed a United Nations conference that opened Saturday in the Gulf state of Qatar.

The 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, or CITES, was discussing new proposals on regulating the trade in number of plant and animal species, including an all-out ban on the export of Atlantic bluefin that has been particularly opposed by seafood-mad Japan.

Raw tuna is a key ingredient in traditional dishes such as sushi and sashimi, and the bluefin variety — called "hon-maguro" in Japan — is particularly prized.

But global stocks of bluefin are dwindling, especially in the Atlantic, and governments around the world are increasingly supporting a complete trade ban to let the fish recover. About 80 percent of the species ends up in Japan.

CITES Secretary-General Willem Wijnstekers told The Associated Press this week that support for the ban was growing and was hopeful the ban would be approved doing the two-week meeting.

"There is no scientific argument against that," said Wijnstekers, whose organization has come out in support of the export ban.

There are 42 proposals on the table at the conference, addressing a range of issues from combating elephant poaching for ivory in Africa to banning trade in polar bear skins. But those focusing on sharks and tuna are likely to be among the most contentious.

They pit the Europeans and Americans against fishing nations in North Africa and Asia, especially Japan, which has already vowed to ignore any bluefin ban. A bid to regulate the trade in red and pink corals — harvested to make expensive jewelry — could also divide the delegates.

According to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, more than half of all marine fish stocks are under threat.

Monaco — the sponsor of the proposed ban on the export of Atlantic bluefin tuna — says numbers have fallen by nearly 75 percent since 1957. But most of the decline has occurred over the last decade with demand driven by sushi lovers in Japan and elsewhere for the bluefin' succulent red and pink meat.

Supporters said the ban is necessary because the Atlantic bluefin is a migratory species that swims from the Western Atlantic to the Mediterranean — putting it beyond any one country's border. Compounding the tuna's plight is the growing threat from illegal fishing fleets and the failure of existing measures that are supposed to ensure the tuna is sustainable.

The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, or ICCAT, is tasked with protecting the tuna. But critics said the intergovernmental body consistently ignores its own scientists in setting quotas and does little to stop countries from exceeding already high quotas.

Wijnstekers said the latest tuna proposal was a reflection of ICCAT's failures and desires by many countries for tougher action. A tuna ban was first proposed in 1992 and tabled on the condition that ICCAT would implement stronger conservation measures.

"It's 18 years later and things have gone terribly wrong," Wijnstekers said. "Parties are coming to CITES and saying other instruments aren't dealing with this so it's time for CITES to do something more dramatic."

The United States backed the ban proposal last week. Many European countries also expressed support, although France and the European Commission have endorsed a compromise to delay the ban until 2011.

Japan, which consumes 80 percent of Atlantic bluefin eaten worldwide, has said it will ignore the ban. The more critical issue is whether other key fishing countries will join Japan's rebuff — which would allow them to sell tuna to Japan.

Tokyo also argues that concerns about the extinction of the Atlantic bluefin are overblown.

The threat of a ban has some Japanese warning their culture is under siege. Sushi is an iconic dish in Japan, where fatty bluefin — called "o-toro" in Japan — sells for as much as 2,000 yen ($20) a piece in high-end Tokyo restaurants.

The conference in Doha is also expected to discuss ways to tackle the illegal trade of tiger products, and the protection of less-known species such as the spiny-tailed iguanas of Mexico and Central America and the spectacular Dynastes satanas beetle of Latin America — both prized by collectors.

Achim Steiner, the executive director of the United Nations Environment Program, which administers the CITES, said limiting the trade on a range of threatened species could go a long way to ensuring biodiversity.

"By ensuring that the international trade in wildlife is properly regulated, CITES can assist in conserving the planet's wild fauna and flora from overexploitation and contribute to the sustainable development," Steiner said.

Ivory and tuna top wildlife talks
Richard Black, BBC News 13 Mar 10;

Sales of ivory and a possible ban on trading bluefin tuna top the agenda for the two-week CITES meeting that opens this weekend in Doha, Qatar.

CITES - the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species - will set a precedent if it votes to ban trading in a lucrative fish such as bluefin.

The US and EU back the proposal, but Japan is set against.

Conservation groups are also hoping for increased protection on sharks, coral, polar bears, lizards and amphibians.

African disunity

The ivory and tuna issues are both potentially controversial.

International ivory trading was banned in 1989.

But countries considered to have well-managed stocks of elephants and reliable systems for tracking tusks have three times been allowed to sell consignments from government stockpiles.

Zambia and Tanzania are now seeking permission for a further sale.

But other African nations led by Kenya and Mali want a 20-year ban on all ivory exports. They argue that the legal trade stimulates poaching, which has been on the rise in recent years.

"To permit any step towards further trade in ivory makes no sense whatsoever - it flies in the face of every basic conservation principle and is contrary to the agreement made at the last meeting," said Jason Bell-Leask from the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw).

However, the organisation Traffic - which is charged with collecting data on illegal elephant killings and ivory smuggling - maintains there is no proof of a link.

Data from its Elephant Trade Information System (Etis) shows that the rate of seizures of illegal ivory began rising well in 2004, well before the last one-off legal ivory sale was authorised in 2007.

And the previous one-off sale, in 1999, co-incided with a fall in seizures.

Etis manager Tom Milliken argues that African governments wanting to stem the rising ivory tide would be better advised to step up enforcement efforts against poachers and traders.

And China, the principal market for illegal ivory, should live up to its promises to act against smuggling gangs, he says.

Otherwise, he says: "Arguments over the impacts of one-off sales will continue to divert attention away from the real problem: finding ways to stop the flow of illicit ivory at source."

Tuna battles

The chances of CITES voting to ban the international trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna increased markedly during the week when - after months of wrangling - the EU decided to give its support.

The bloc includes several nations with tuna fleets in the Mediterranean, the main fishing ground.

Conservation groups argue that the ban is needed because governments involved in the industry have allowed overfishing to such an extent that the species' survival is in some doubt.

They also argue that a pause in fishing will eventually lead to higher catches.

"The goal is not to ban trade indefinitely, but to suspend international trade until the species recovers sufficiently to enable international trade to resume," said Sue Lieberman, director of international policy with the Pew Environment Group.

"This is a key conservation moment - whether the governments here will vote for the conservation of bluefin tuna, or will allow commercial fishery interests to prevail, further causing over-fishing and continued decline of this iconic species," she told BBC News from Doha.

Japan has indicated that it would opt out of a trade ban, as it is entitled to do under CITES rules.

But if all other tuna fishing countries went along with it, there would be no supply of tuna to import.

Conservation groups are urging the EU and US to make sure that other tuna fishing countries, particularly North African states bordering the Mediterranean, do not opt out.

Skin and teeth

The CITES meeting will also consider a US proposal to ban international trade in items originating from polar bears.

Rapid melting of Arctic sea ice in recent decades has placed the polar bear on the Red List of Threatened Species.

About 2,000 items are traded internationally each year, including skin, skulls, teeth and claws.

Although this is not considered to be the major threat to the species' survival, the US feels that the trade ban would be a help, and would not intrude on the rights of Arctic indigenous peoples with a history of hunting polar bears for meat and skin.

Other proposals would see trade banned in a number of reptiles and amphibians, including three iguanas from Mexico and the critically endangered Luristan newt of Iran.

Four species of shark are also up for consideration, as are the red and pink Corallium corals from the Mediterranean that are used in the jewellery trade.


Read more!

Tiger Mauls Villager in Jambi National Park, Indonesia

Fidelis E. Satriastanti, Jakarta Globe 14 Mar 10;

Local officials will investigate a tiger attack in Jambi province in which a villager was severely injured last week, an official said on Sunday.

Ishak, 37, has been receiving intensive treatment at Raden Mattaher Hospital in Jambi city after being mauled by a Sumatran tiger on Wednesday morning. He suffered severe injuries to his legs and neck.

Ishak and three of his friends were wandering in Berbak National Park, five kilometers from their village, to collect agarwood, according to his friends.

Based on his friends’ testimony, the tiger attacked while Ishak was asleep and it tried to drag him into the forest by his leg. His friends manage to save him but his legs were badly injured.

“We’re still trying to find out exactly what went on out there because it seemed a bit out of the ordinary that tigers could have just jumped and attacked like that,” said Didy Wurdjanto, the head of the Jambi Natural Resources Conservation Center.

Didy added that normally tigers were not so aggressive toward villagers who were just out there to collect forests’ yields, even at night.

“Tigers are known to be aggressive if their habitat is being disturbed, such as if their drinking areas are being occupied or their prey is nowhere to be seen, but this aggressive attitude is a bit new [for us],” he said.

He added that the attack on Ishak was the first one recorded this year.

The 160,000 hectares of wetland forest in Berbak National Park is home to at least eight Sumatran tigers.

Only about 400 Sumatran tigers are believed to be left. Throughout Jambi, there are only 20 Sumatran tigers left. Deforestation has destroyed much of their habitat and they are hunted for traditional medicines and illegal menageries.

Despite the attack, Didy said the conversation center would not increase security in the national park.

“We’re counting on villagers’ local wisdom, because they have been living with tigers for many years. I am sure that they would know better than to disturb the animals,” he said.

He added that the national park was also being threatened by illegal loggers.

At least nine people were killed in tiger attacks in Jambi province last year, while four tigers also died.

In one of the most controversial cases, a Sumatran tiger was killed inside a zoo. Sheila, who was the only Sumatran tiger remaining at Taman Rimbo Zoo, was killed and skinned on the zoo grounds after being drugged by poachers early on Aug. 22, leaving virtually nothing behind except the innards and a few ribs.

The Sumatran tiger is critically endangered in the wild.

Man survives tiger attack in Jambi
The Jakarta Post 13 Mar 10;

A man is receiving an intensive medical treatment at Raden Mattaher Hospital in Jambi city after surviving a tiger attack on Thursday, Antara reported.

The tiger mauled Ishak, 37, late at night on Thursday as the sandalwood collector was resting inside a hut. One of his friends ran for a help and managed to release him from the carnivore.

Ishak suffered severe injuries to his neck, back and legs due to the attack.

“He survived after his friend pulled him from the tiger’s claws as the animal was trying to drag him into the forest,” Didiek Wurjanto, head of Jambi Natural Resources Conservation Agency, said.

Didiek said Ishak and his friends were collecting sandalwood at Berbak National Park.

It was the first case of tiger attack this year. The conservation agency data revealed eight people were mauled to death by tigers in Jambi last year.


Read more!

Crack down on blast fishing in East Java

East Java fishermen arrested for possessing explosives
Antara 13 Mar 10;

Pamekasan, E Java (ANTARAvNews) - Policemen in the East Java island of Madura arrested three fishermen for possessing home-made explosives in a sweeping operation on Thursday.

The fishermen of Candi hamlet, Polagan village, Galis sub-district, Pamekasan regency, were caught red handed with the evidence minutes before going for fishing, a police officer said.

Chief of Pamekasan police precinct Adjunct Senior Commissioner Mas Gunarso said here Friday that the suspects were only identified as "N", "I" and "D". "They are all from Candi hamlet," he said.

The policemen also confiscated 15 packs of explosives. They were suspected of practicing blast fishing on the sea near the coastal village, he said.

"Thanks to the people`s information on their destructive habit," he said, adding the suspects would be charged with Law Number 12/1951 on weapons and explosives.
The law violators were threatened with life sentence, he said.

The arrest of these three fishermen was the second over the past four months.
On December 18, 2009, the Pamekasan policemen also seized two tons of explosive materials, including five sacks of potassium, from a resident`s house in Kertagena Daja village, Kadur sub-district.

The police named three villagers as suspects.

The blast fishing remains destructive habits of a number of fishermen in Indonesia. As a result, the preservation of coral reefs, fish population and other marine resources are in danger.

On March 5, Chief of Bengkulu`s naval base, Lt.Col.Sukrisno, warned fishermen in Bengkulu Province of the legal sanctions for those using explosives in fishing.
Instead of using the explosives, Sukrisno urged the fishermen to use fishing nets as the Bengkulu province`s fishing and marine authorities had recommended.

According to C.Pet-Soede, H.S.J. Cesar and J.S.Pet`s research report (1999), the blast fishing was introduced in Indonesia in World War II as "an easy and profitable way to catch schooling reef fish".

The blast fishing activities do not only threaten the coral reef ecosystem but also lead to the destruction of coral reef fisheries, they said in their study report. (*)


Read more!

Indigenous Rights Bill Could Affect Indonesian Companies’ Land Concessions if Passed

Fidelis E. Satriastanti, Jakarta Globe 14 Mar 10;

A law is being drafted that would not only acknowledge the rights of indigenous groups to own their ancestral lands but could affect companies with land concessions in disputed areas.

If the bill, being drafted by the Regional Representatives Council (DPD) and the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), is adopted by the House of Representatives, it would be the first to fully protect the rights of indigenous people.

“We need this law because it could provide a legal foundation for conflicting parties to turn to,” AMAN secretary general Abdon Nababan said. “If they have the same legal ground, I think all those [land] conflicts could be settled.”

Abdon said the bill had been included on the House’s National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) list for 2010-14, and a whole year would be spent focusing on approaching indigenous peoples at the regional level. He said the most controversial aspect of the bill would be economic.

“The economic battle will be very visible because once acknowledgment of indigenous rights has been elaborated, [it will have to be established] how to renegotiate companies’ concessions on their customary lands.”

Indigenous people were acknowledged in the 2007 Law on Coastal Areas and Small Islands Management and the 2009 Law on Environmental Protection and Management, but these did not cover the rights of indigenous people comprehensively.

In addition, Indonesia, along with 144 other countries, supported the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which was issued in September 2007.

“The 2007 law only covers indigenous people in coastal areas and the new green law is only talking about the environmental perspective,” Abdon said. “Meanwhile, you need to understand that indigenous peoples should be defined by their customary systems, not just boundaries.”

He said the toughest challenge was to impose the understanding that indigenous peoples have their own laws in their own areas, which was the source of land conflicts in the country.

“The conflicts started when government failed to acknowledge that there are customary laws that covered customary lands before this republic was formed,” he said.

Based on AMAN data, there are at least 50 million to 70 million indigenous people among Indonesia’s 220 million population. However, only about 1,163 communities are under the alliance.

Members of Commission III of the House of Representatives, responsible for human rights, had no immediate comment.

The government has stated that there is no such thing as an indigenous person, as every Indonesian citizen is equal in the eyes of the Constitution.

Indigenous people start mapping territory
Adianto P. Simamora, The Jakarta Post 13 Mar 10;

Indigenous people have begun mapping their customary land across the country in an effort to gain recognition amid conflict with the government and business communities over land ownership.

The Alliance of Archipelagic Indigenous People (AMAN) estimated the indigenous people had traditionally occupied about 20 million hectares of land, most natural forest.

AMAN, with its 1,163 communities occupying about 7.5 million hectares of land, mapped 2.3 million hectares of customary land.

“We will submit the map to the government as a reference for land policies,” secretary-general of AMAN, Abdon Nababan, told The Jakarta Post on Friday.

The mapping was organized by AMAN, Forest Watch Indonesia and the Network for Participatory Mapping.

The coalition set up a customary land registration body that will be in charge of mapping the land
traditionally occupied by indigenous people.

Abdon said that massive conversions of forest occupied by customary communities were undertaken for business purposes, including plantations, and mining had yet to negate the involvement of indigenous groups.

It then led to repeated conflicts between customary communities with business players.
The map will determine the total forest belonging to indigenous people, which will be used as a source for their livelihood.

He said that the government must change its perspective in managing the country’s natural resources by ignoring the rights of indigenous people and undermining local wisdom in protecting forests.

“The government still looks at customary land as state forest, though the indigenous people occupied the area long before the government’s presence,” he said.

“Indigenous people need legal certainty,” he said.

Articles 18B and 28I in the amended 1945 Constitution say that the state recognizes and respects the rights of indigenous people.

The House of Representatives is scheduled to discuss a draft bill on recognition rights of customary communities this year.

The 1999 ministerial decree on guidelines on resolving the rights of customary land stipulates the state protected customary community.

So far, the Forestry Ministry and the Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry have ignored communal rights by issuing mining permits and forest concessions.

Coordinator of the BRWA, Kasmita Widodo, said the mapping process would take place in three years. The locations would be determined during the congress in April in Medan, North Sumatra.

The customary community roles has been a crucial issue in international climate change talks in protecting forests to prevent carbon leakage once the deforestation and forest degradation scheme to reduce emissions (REDD) occurs.

The unclear status of indigenous people managing forests may hamper the REDD program’ implementation.

Environment Minister Gusti Muhammad Hatta said at least 20 percent of revenue from the REDD scheme should be transferred to indigenous people, who play crucial roles in protecting the forest.


Read more!

The rise of gas power

Michael Richardson, The Straits Times 15 Mar 10;

WHEN Singapore switched some years ago from oil to natural gas as its mainstay for generating electricity, gas was seen as a 'transition' fuel until renewable energy or nuclear power became feasible.

With oil prices liable to rise sharply and concerns growing about climate change linked to the burning of fossil fuels, it made sense to switch as piped gas from Indonesia and Malaysia became available. When burned, gas emits less than half the carbon dioxide produced by equivalent amounts of coal or oil. So by switching to gas, Singapore sharply reduced its global warming greenhouse emissions.

At the time, reserves of conventional gas, trapped in big pockets under the land or seabed, appeared to be stretched by rising demand. However, in the past few years, enterprise, technological advances and an ever-widening search for new sources of energy have transformed the outlook. The technology enables gas to be extracted from more places underground. In the United States, Canada, Australia, Asia and Europe, huge reserves of so-called unconventional gas trapped in shale rock, coal seams and tight layers of sandstone have been identified.

A study by IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates released last week shows that a boom in shale gas production in North America has more than doubled total gas resources and can supply over a century of consumption at current rates.

Gas locked in shale formations is expected to account for 50 per cent of US supply by 2035, up from 20 per cent today and just 1 per cent in 2000. The gas is released using new techniques in horizontal drilling to inject a mix of water, sand and chemicals under high pressure into the rock to fracture it - a process known as 'fracking'.

The North American shale gas boom is significant for Asia in at least two ways. First, it has helped reduce global gas prices by taking the US, the world's biggest user, out of the running as a major importer of liquefied natural gas (LNG).

This plus a recession-driven fall in demand for gas saw spot LNG prices tumble last year to around US$4 (S$5.60) per million British thermal units (mmBtu), from record highs of about US$22 per mmBtu in 2008.

There is now a gas glut, which is good news for established buyers of LNG in Asia signing new contracts, and for emerging buyers like Singapore - which plans to start importing around 1,500 million tons of this super-cooled gas in tankers in 2013.

Asia accounts for about two-thirds of the world's LNG imports. Major consumers are Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan and India. Unlike oil, much of the gas - both conventional and unconventional - lies in or close to Asia.

The second implication of the North American shale gas boom for Asia is that it may herald similar gas reserve expansions elsewhere, although 'fracking' has become controversial in the US where critics say it uses excessive amounts of water and risks polluting water supplies.

Still, energy consultants Nextant said that global unconventional gas resources may amount to 934 trillion cubic metres and if only 20 per cent can be economically recovered, the world's proven gas reserves could be doubled.

Production of methane (the main component of natural gas) from coal seams is already occurring in Australia, China, Colombia and Europe. Russia will be added to the list soon, followed perhaps by India.

Lambert Energy Advisory reckons that Australia's coal bed methane amounts to the equivalent of 40 billion barrels of oil while Indonesia and China each have 75 billion. In addition, China's shale gas potential is put at between 50 and 100 billion barrels of oil equivalent.

Australia aims to use its coal bed methane resources to become the world's biggest exporter of unconventional gas. Indonesia, which plans to open tenders for onshore shale gas this year, and Canada could also become leading exporters.

If major developing economies like China, India and Indonesia burned more gas and less coal in generating electricity, it would help curb greenhouse gas emissions in Asia.

Despite current low gas prices and the wave of new gas field development, energy company executives see global demand, led by Asia, growing fast enough in the next few years to absorb excess supply and lift prices. They say that the long-term challenge is to keep developing new gas supplies beyond unconventional gas reserves. This may come over the next few decades from gas hydrates - vast deposits of crystallised methane held in place by low temperature and high pressure, and found on the seabed or beneath the land permafrost zones of at least 100 countries.

The US Geological Survey says that hydrates may contain more organic carbon than the world's coal, oil and non-hydrate gas combined. The US, Japan, China, India and South Korea are all in the race to try to tap gas hydrates. If they overcome the major challenges involved, gas will remain a long-lasting part of the global energy scene.

The writer is a visiting senior research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Read more!

Conserving energy: Paradox and policy

Tilak K. Doshi, The Straits Times 15 Mar 10;

SINCE the Copenhagen climate change meeting in December, much ink has flowed on the subject of energy efficiency and what governments can do about it.

Much of the literature has focused on 'emission abatement curves'. These curves trace the outlook for new energy-saving or carbon-capture technologies that become competitive as the cost of carbon emissions increases.

For example, when petrol or diesel prices are high enough to reflect the carbon content of such fuels, hybrid petrol-electric cars become more attractive to consumers. Likewise, at even higher fuel prices, fully electric vehicles may begin to compete with hybrids, and so on. Abatement cost curves provide a map of possible technology futures in an increasingly carbon-constrained world.

Yet the most remarkable aspect of these curves is not what they tell us about emerging technologies but about those that are already cost-competitive. Studies show that people are slow to adopt cost-effective energy-conserving technologies. Examples include compact fluorescent light bulbs, improved insulation materials and energy-efficient household appliances. This then is the paradox: Why does there seem to be so little investment in these forms of technology when they save money and energy?

To this seeming paradox, economists have generally responded in one of two ways: Either it is a market failure of some sort or consumers' behaviour does make sense despite apparently objective cost-benefit calculations to the contrary.

One obvious source of market failure is the lack of information about the available technologies. If companies fail to publicise them on a large enough scale, as is likely, there is a case to be made for the authorities to provide the information free or at subsidised rates.

But what if the slow spread of cost-effective technologies is due not to consumer ignorance but rather to rational behaviour? In this case, there would be no basis for government intervention.

Consumers and businesses may come to the conclusion that there is little point in investing in new technologies at the moment, especially when the costs of adoption are likely to fall as the technologies become more commonplace in the future. It may pay to just 'wait and see'. So what may seem at first like a market failure, may in fact be the result of rational choice.

Another example of market failure arises when the party which invests in energy-saving technology hardly benefits from it. If the owner of a house cannot ask for a higher selling price for his property even if he makes it more environmentally friendly, he will have no incentive to invest in energy-efficient appliances. Similarly, landlords who rent out their homes have no interest in energy efficiency since they do not pay the bills and enjoy the cost savings.

In this case, it may make sense to develop an audited home energy rating system to give house buyers and renters reliable information about their likely savings on energy bills. This would make energy-efficient properties more attractive and encourage landlords and homeowners to invest in green technology.

In making energy technology choices, some situations suggest a role for government intervention while others do not. Depending on the specific nature of market failure or apparently poor consumer choices, correct responses may range from better education and regulations - mandatory product labelling, energy-efficiency audits of new buildings, etc - to using market-based incentives such as carbon taxes and 'cap-and-trade' regimes. In some cases, the correct policy may well be to do nothing.

Those who would argue for aggressive taxpayer-financed investments in green technology should beware of premature and costly transitions to low carbon-emission technologies. The tendency for government funding initiatives to be captured by special interests has been widely observed. The promotion of ethanol in the United States, for example, has probably more to do with the clout of powerful senators from corn-growing states than with the national interest.

Despite the apparent paradox of energy conservation, consumers and entrepreneurs betting their own money on new energy-efficient technologies are the ones making intelligent choices.

The writer is the chief economist at the Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore.


Read more!

UN climate change claims on rainforests were wrong, study suggests

The United Nations' climate change panel is facing fresh criticism after new research contradicted the organisation's claims about the devastating effect climate change could have on the Amazon rainforest.
Richard Gray, The Telegraph 13 Mar 10;

A new study, funded by Nasa, has found that the most serious drought in the Amazon for more than a century had little impact on the rainforest's vegetation.

The findings appear to disprove claims by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that up to 40% of the Amazon rainforest could react drastically to even a small reduction in rainfall and could see the trees replaced by tropical grassland.

The IPCC has already faced intense criticism for using a report by environmental lobby group WWF as the basis for its claim, which in turn had failed to cite the original source of the research.

Scientists have now spoken out against the 40% figure contained in the IPCC report and say that recent research is suggesting that the rainforest may be more resilient to climate change than had been previously thought.

It comes just days after the UN announced an independent review into the panel's procedures following a series of scandals over its most recent report which was found to contain factual errors and claims which were not based on rigorous scientific research.

The InterAcademy Council, which is the umbrella organisation for the national academies of science around the world, will examine how the IPCC's reports are compiled and communicated.

Dr Jose Marengo, a climate scientist with the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research and a member of the IPCC, said the latest study on the Amazon's response to drought highlighted the errors in the previous claims.

He said: "The way the WWF report calculated this 40% was totally wrong, while (the new) calculations are by far more reliable and correct."

The new study, conducted by researchers at Boston University and published in the scientific journal Geophysical Research Letters, used satellite data of the Amazon rainforest to study the effects of a major drought in 2005 when rainfall fell to the lowest level in living memory.

The drought saw rivers and lakes dry up, causing towns and cities that rely upon water flowing out of the rainforest to suffer severe water shortages.

But the researchers found no major changes in the levels of vegetation and greenery in the forests despite the drought.

They claim this contradicts the statements made in the IPCC's 2007 assessment report on climate change.

It said: "Up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state.

"It is more probably that forests will be replaced by ecosystems that have more resistance to multiple stresses caused by temperature increase, droughts and fires, such as tropical savannahs."

Professor Ranga Myneni, from the climate and vegitation research group at Boston University who was the senior researcher in the study, said criticised the IPCC’s claim that a “even a slight reduction in precipitation” would cause drastic changes in the rainforest.

He said: “There was more than a slight reduction in precipitation during the drought of 2005. It is that particular claim of the IPCC that our analysis rejects.”

Sangram Ganguly, a scientist from the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute in California and one of the researchers who conducted the new study, said: "Our results certainly do not indicate such extreme sensitivity to reductions in rainfall."

Dr Arindam Samanta, the lead author of the study, said: "We found no big differences in the greenness levels of these forests between drought and non-drought years, which suggests that these forests may be more tolerant of droughts than we previously thought."

The IPCC has been left embarrassed after it emerged the panel had quoted unsubstantiated and erroneous claims about the melting of glaciers in the Himalayas and had also used information from student dissertations and magazine articles to compile its report.

The chair of the panel, Rajendra Pachauri has come under mounting pressure to resign following the scandal and questions over his ability to lead the organisation.

Dr Keith Allott, head of climate change at WWF UK, said: "The WWF report from 2000 on the threat of wildfires in Amazon was based on respected sources and peer-reviewed literature available at the time.

"Subsequent peer-reviewed literature has confirmed that the Amazon faces serious risks from climate change. This new study is a welcome addition to the growing body of evidence."

Dr Simon Lewis, an expert on forest die back at Leeds University and a research fellow at the Royal Society, said the Boston University study had helped to clear up debate about how the rainforest responded to short-term drought.

But he added that long-term reductions in rainfall might have a very different impact.

No one was available to respond at the IPCC yesterday.


Read more!