Programme for public to learn how Singapore manages its environment

Channel NewsAsia 28 Jan 08;

SINGAPORE: The Singapore Environment Institute (SEI) has started its Programme for Environmental Experiential Learning (PEEL).

Under this programme, environment industry professionals and members of the public can learn how Singapore manages its environment.

There will be site tours and visits to various facilities, including the world's biggest waste-to-energy incineration plant at Tuas.

Participants will also learn how Singapore fights air pollution, how trash is dealt with, and how it keeps its waters clean.

Participants can even visit a mosquito research lab at the National Environmental Agency (NEA) and find out how NEA is fighting dengue.

Those interested in the tours can find out more online at www.nea.gov.sg/sei. - CNA/ac


Read more!

Oldest Horseshoe Crab Fossil Discovered

Jeanna Bryner, LiveScience Yahoo News 28 Jan 08;

Understanding how horseshoe crabs adapted to their ecological niche so early and then weathered natural crises will give scientists broader insights about how ocean ecosystems changed over time.

Nearly a half a billion years ago, tiny horseshoe crabs crept along the shorelines much like today's larger versions do, new fossil evidence suggests.

Two nearly complete fossil specimens discovered in Canada reveal a new genus of horseshoe crab, pushing their origins back at least 100 million years earlier than previously thought.

Dubbed Lunataspis aurora, the ancient horseshoe crab is estimated to have been just 1.5 inches (4 centimeters) from head to tail-tip. That's much smaller than its modern-day relatives that can span nearly 20 inches (50 centimeters).

"We do not know if the fossils were small because they were simply young animals or because Lunataspis just didn't grow any bigger," said researcher David Rudkin of the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada.

Crabby find

Rudkin and his colleagues, including Graham Young of the Manitoba Museum, spotted the fossils buried in 445-million-year-old rocks from the Ordovician period in central and northern Manitoba. They describe the discovery in the January issue of the journal Paleontology.

The specimens included patches of the animals' outer-covering and even evidence of their compound eyes.

Horseshoe crabs are not true crabs and are instead more closely related to spiders and scorpions. And like their eight-legged relatives, horseshoe crabs sport a flexible exoskeleton made of chitin rather than the hard-shell armoring worn by crabs.

Chitin degrades over time. For that reason, ancient specimens of horseshoe crabs have been sparse. Until now, the oldest fossils dated back 350 million years ago, from the Carboniferous period. Fossils have also been found in rocks from the Jurassic Period, suggesting the animals were crawling around beneath dinosaurs. Both the Carboniferous and the Jurassic fossil discoveries indicate the ancient horseshoe crabs greatly resembled their modern-day counterparts.

Primitive looks

Analysis of the recent finds also indicates the ocean creatures haven’t changed much over the eons.

"We wouldn't necessarily have expected horseshoe crabs to look very much like the modern ones, but that's exactly what they look like," Rudkin said.

"This body plan that they've invented, they've stayed with it for almost a half a billion years. It's a good plan," Rudkin told LiveScience. "They've survived almost unchanged up until the present day, whereas lots of other animals haven't."

And whereas major extinction events have wiped even the mightiest, non-avian dinosaurs from our planet, this primitive-looking organism has come out unscathed.

"The horseshoe crab, the lowly little animal that crawls out of the sea every once in a while to mate, it's survived for at least 445 million years in more or less the same form," Rudkin said.

He added that understanding how horseshoe crabs adapted to their ecological niche so early and then weathered natural crises will give scientists broader insights about how ocean ecosystems changed over time.


Read more!

Chefs and Greenpeace bid to save threatened fish

Jeremy Lovell, Reuters 28 Jan 08;

LONDON (Reuters) - Leading British chefs will join forces with Greenpeace on Wednesday in a campaign to push restaurants to serve up only species of fish that have not been overexploited.

Experts say that some three-quarters of the world's fish stocks has been pushed to the brink due to overfishing and, with it, widespread corruption.

"Protecting the diversity of fish in our seas is at least as important as looking after our plants and land-animals," said leading chef Raymond Blanc, who is backing the information campaign to discourage the use of threatened fish.

"Those of us who are passionate about cooking and serving seafood will be equally passionate about using only sustainable species, as the fish we cook and eat now will determine what we are able to use and consume in the future," he added.

It is not the exotic fish species that the campaign, being launched at London's Old Billingsgate Fish Market on Wednesday evening, is setting out to protect but the formerly common ones such as cod, halibut and tuna by spreading awareness amongst chefs and food writers.

The pressures of demand on these species, as well as environmental damage, has forced many of them into decline.

CRISIS LEVELS

Environment group WWF has been warning for some time that demand for Mediterranean blue fin tuna has pushed stocks down to crisis levels.

"No one wants to see some of our fishy favorites disappear from dinner plates. But, unless we only use seafood that has been caught in a sustainable manner, then this is a situation we could see very soon," said Sarah Shoraka from Greenpeace.

The Worldwatch Institute, a U.S.-based environmental watchdog, estimated in its 2008 State of the World report that increasing wealth in Asia had sharply boosted demand for seafood, adding to the pressure on dwindling stocks.

It noted that fish consumption in China had increased demand 10-fold since 1961 and that fish now supplied 30 percent of demand for protein in Asia against six percent globally.

Conservationists have also warned that booming demand coupled with increasing regulation had led to a rise in corruption around fisheries, ranging from mislabeling landed fish to secretly landing excess catches to simple bribery.

IUCN, the World Conservation Union, is convening a meeting in Washington this week to discuss the extent of corruption in fisheries worldwide.

(Reporting by Jeremy Lovell)


Read more!

Join retailers’ Mediterranean bluefin tuna boycott, urges WWF

WWF website 28 Jan 08;

As more and more major European retailers boycott Mediterranean Bluefin Tuna, WWF used the occasion of the Barcelona Seafood Summit to call on more to join the ban until the imperilled species is out of the danger zone.

France's Auchan group, with a nearly 14 per cent share of the retail fish trade, was the first to declare a boycott on 28 December, noting that scientists had advised a 15,000 tonne ceiling on annual catches, while the international tuna management body was allowing a 2008 quota of 29,500 tonnes.

"Moreover, each year, captures greatly exceed the fixed quotas," Auchan said in a statement outlining how the ban had been taken in line with its policy of pursuing a sustainable trade in fish.

Since then, a number of Swiss, Italian and Norwegian retail chains have declared boycotts and more are considering them.

“WWF applauds Auchan in France, Carrefour in Italy, Coop in both Italy and Switzerland, and ICA in Norway for their courageous decisions to stop selling Mediterranean bluefin tuna – and we urge other retailers to follow suit,” says Dr Sergi Tudela, Head of Fisheries at WWF Mediterranean.

“The seafood industry is waking up to its responsibilities, recognising that there is not an endless supply of fish like bluefin tuna. By taking action now, retailers can help give this amazing species a fighting chance of survival, for the benefit of both business and the marine ecosystem.”

Scientists have declared it “probable” that populations of the magnificent bluefin tuna, much prized especially for sushi in Japan, will soon collapse in the Mediterranean – unless action is taken now.

Before retailers started taking matters into their own hands, WWF had suggested to the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) meeting in November that contracting countries agree on a 3-year ban on bluefin tuna fishing, but this move was rejected.

Following massive demand in recent years – especially from Japan where Atlantic bluefin is prized for Sushi – high-tech fishing fleets have hunted down, often illegally, ever-declining numbers of these migratory ocean giants.

WWF exposed the drastically out-of-control nature of the Mediterranean bluefin tuna fishery in the 2007 season when illegal fishing was again rife – including the use of banned spotter planes, as well as widespread unreporting. According to WWF sources, the Spanish authorities, for example, officially declared only two thirds of the nation’s catch last year.

“Fisheries management has gone completely off the rails – the Mediterranean bluefin tuna fishery is now a dangerous game in which clearly all sides will lose,” Dr Tudela said. “That’s why WWF is urging retailers to stand up for sustainable fish.”

WWF calls for supermarkets to boycott bluefin tuna
Yahoo News 28 Jan 08;

The environmental group WWF on Monday called on supermarket chains around the world to take bluefin tuna off their shelves, saying overfishing, driven by the craze for sushi, threatened to wipe out the species.

Praising several retail chains that have taken the lead in refusing to sell bluefin, WWF said it was time for "retailers around the world to emulate their courageous decision... until this fish is out of danger."

Last November, European Union (EU) fisheries ministers agreed to restrict the fishing of bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean under a 15-year plan to revive dwindling stocks.

The French supermarket giant Auchan, as well as the Italian subsidiaries of Coop and Carrefour, have already stopped selling bluefin.


Read more!

Maldives Builds Barriers to Global Warming

Jon Hamilton, NPR 28 Jan 08;

You catch a ferry from a part of Male where motorcycles clog the narrow streets and fishermen gut their morning catch on the sidewalk. A few minutes later, you arrive in a brand new world, the island of Hulhumale. It's an artificial island built by engineers, not volcanoes.

Countries struggling with climate change could learn a lot from a constellation of tiny islands in the Indian Ocean.

The Republic of Maldives was one of the first countries to recognize the danger of rising sea levels. It's also one of the first to come up with a plan to adapt to a warmer world.

It's easy to see why this nation is so attuned to climate change. In the Maldives, you can climb a small palm tree and be higher than the highest point of land.

These islands burst through the surface of the ocean thousands of years ago when a chain of underwater volcanoes erupted. They've been subsiding ever since. Only the very tops, now capped with coral sand, remain above water.

That has created a paradise for tourists. But the pristine blue water that draws people from around the world is also threatening to wash away the entire country.

Rising Waters

President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom has spent the past couple of decades talking about that threat.

In 1992 at the United Nations Earth Summit, he said, "I stand before you as a representative of an endangered people. We are told that as a result of global warming and sea-level rise, my country, the Maldives, may sometime during the next century, disappear from the face of the Earth."

It was a dramatic claim at a time when few people had even heard of climate change. Today, though, scientists agree that the Earth is getting warmer and polar ice is melting.

Azeez Abdul Azeez Hakim runs a marine research lab on the island of Vabbinfaru in the Maldives. He says that as polar ice melts, "this water has to go somewhere, and there is no way that we can prevent this water coming into the Indian Ocean, into the Maldives."

Of course, floods are nothing new to people here. The 2004 tsunami pretty much submerged the Maldives for several minutes. In 1987, tidal surges flooded the capital, causing millions of dollars in damage.

A Hands-On Approach


But Azeez says things are going to get worse.

"We have to survive," he says. "We have to find a way to prevent water, sea water coming into the island."

But how?

President Gayoom initially tried political solutions. The Maldives was the first country to sign the Kyoto protocol to fight global warming. But that hasn't done much yet to slow down sea-level rise.

So Gayoom, ruler of the Maldives for 30 years now, has been experimenting with a more hands-on approach, starting with a project near his presidential palace.

His first effort was a massive seawall made of concrete tetrapods. It surrounds the entire capital of Male.

Gayoom was able to persuade the Japanese government to pay for the $60 million wall after the floods of 1987. The wall reduced the vulnerability of Male, which is a mile long and houses one-third of the country's population.

But the wall also makes Male the least attractive of the Maldives' 200 inhabited islands.

So Gayoom — whose power here lets him do pretty much anything he wants — is now trying something a lot more ambitious just across the lagoon.

A Flood-Resistant Island


You catch a ferry from a part of Male where motorcycles clog the narrow streets and fishermen gut their morning catch on the sidewalk. A few minutes later, you arrive in a brand new world, the island of Hulhumale. It's an artificial island built by engineers, not volcanoes.

When the ferry arrives, you step up onto this island. The streets are straight and wide. There's a new hospital, new schools, new government buildings, new apartments — all several feet higher than the rest of the Maldives.

The flood-resistant island was created by a huge dredge that sucked up sand from the ocean floor and disgorged it into a shallow lagoon. Eventually, Hulhumale rose from the waters.

That was more than five years ago. Now, several thousand people live here. Gayoom's goal is to attract at least 50,000.

But unlike their president, residents don't talk much about climate change.

They say they like Hulhumale because it's clean. It has wide sand beaches instead of a concrete seawall. Apartments are less expensive than on Male.

Maldivians' priorities come as no surprise to Mohammed Chaid of the Hulhumale Development Corporation, which was set up by the government to build and settle the new island.

"The higher elevation of the land is to address the sea-level rise," he says. "But the primary factor is to create a city to ease the congestion in Male."

So Gayoom appears to have solved two major problems at once: creating a safer place to live and getting people to move there.

As governments around the world are discovering, most people won't make big changes because of the distant threat of global warming. But they will change for an immediate and tangible benefit. Let's face it, we're more likely to buy a hybrid car if we can drive in the carpool lanes while we're saving the planet.

So climate change may not be the main reason Maldivians are moving to their new island. But it has helped the country pay for it.

"That is an example of how we can adapt to future changes," says Abdulla Naseer, who runs the Ministry of Fisheries. "But of course, it involves a lot of costs as well.

And President Gayoom wants other countries to help pay the costs of finishing Hulhumale, which is only half done, and raising portions of several other islands.

His strategy has been to make the case that developed nations are causing climate change and that they must help pay for solutions like taller islands.

"Over half of our islands are eroding at an alarming rate," Gayoom said at the U.N.'s climate change meeting in Bali in late 2007. "In some cases, island communities have had to be relocated to safer islands. Without immediate action, the long-term habitation of our tiny islands is in serious doubt."

By action, he means money. And thanks to a change in the political climate over the past couple of decades, Gayoom is likely to get what he wants.


Read more!

British food makers aim to save water - and money

Jeremy Lovell, Reuters 28 Jan 08;

LONDON (Reuters) - Several major British food manufacturers joined forces on Monday with a pledge to help the environment by saving water, and with it money.

The pledge by 21 firms including Cadbury Schweppes, Tate & Lyle and Nestle UK is part of a wider initiative under the auspices of the Food and Drink Federation (FDF) to cut carbon dioxide emissions and packaging and improve energy efficiency.

"The environment is a very broad area so we have cut it down into manageable chunks ... water is the easiest one to start with," said Fiona Dawson, managing director of Mars Snackfood UK and chair of the FDF's sustainability steering group.

"We want to raise the profile of water as a scarce resource," she told a news conference. "This is industry leaders working together to benefit themselves and the environment."

She said food hygiene standards would not be compromised by efforts to reduce water consumption.

Britain's food manufacturing sector accounts for 10 percent of total industrial water usage, and the aim of the new pledge is to cut this by 20 percent from current levels by 2020.

If successful this could amount to savings of about 140 million liters of water a day, worth an estimated 60 million pounds a year.

Although Britain has a temperate climate and is more known for floods than droughts, climate change and rising industrial and domestic demand are turning parts of the country into water stressed regions, particularly the south east.

The FDF cited the case of potato crisp maker Walkers, which managed to cut its water consumption by half, saving 700 million liters a year by recycling, cutting waste and raising awareness.

Dawson said her company had managed to cut the water used in cooling chocolate by 40 percent through using new technology.

"Water is a good place to start. You can make savings of 20 to 30 percent at very little cost," said Martin Gibson of Envirowise, a government-funded program to help businesses reduce their environmental impact. "Success there gives business more confidence to take steps in other areas."

Envirowise has joined up with the food manufacturers to help run and monitor the water saving project.

(Reporting by Jeremy Lovell; Editing by Paul Bolding)


Read more!

Japan targets climate change with $10 billion fund

Natsuko Waki, Reuters 26 Jan 08;

DAVOS, Switzerland (Reuters) - Japan, one of the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitters, presented a $10 billion package on Saturday to help emerging countries tackle climate change without risking growth.

Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, who hosts the Group of Eight leaders' summit in northern Japan in July, also said Japan would cut its carbon emissions beyond the 2012 expiry of the Kyoto Protocol and proposed a global target to improve energy efficiency by 2020.

The five-year "Cool Earth Partnership" fund, financed publicly and privately, will set aside up to $8 billion for assistance in climate change mitigation, and up to $2 billion for grants, aid and technical assistance for countries switching to clean energy.

"There is no time to lose in addressing climate change," Fukuda told some of the 2,500 business and political leaders at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum during his flying visit to the ski resort of Davos.

"We will extend the hand of assistance to developing countries suffering severe adverse impacts as a result of climate change."

Fukuda said the G8 will be committed to work on climate issues but must include emerging countries in the discussion. Fukuda's climate proposals included a global target to improve energy efficiency by 30 percent by 2020.

Japan will also be investing about $30 billion in research and development in the environment and energy sectors over the next five years.

"The world as a whole must strive to improve energy efficiency until revolutionary technology which will dramatically reduce greenhouse gas becomes available," he said.

Fukuda made no mention of the details of the country's planned targets on reducing emission.

Emissions targets are a contentious issue in Japan, where business groups are fiercely opposed to profit-threatening policies such as a carbon tax or a European-style mandatory cap-and-trade system to penalize polluters.

At United Nations-led talks in Bali last month, Japan sided with the United States and rejected a European Union-backed emissions cut target beyond 2012, prompting outrage among environmentalists.

Every summer Japan carries out a "Cool Biz" campaign to get office workers, including government ministers, to shed their stuffy suits and ties and keep thermostats at 28 degrees Celsius (82 degrees Fahrenheit) as a way to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.


Read more!

Anthropocene: Humans Force Earth into New Geologic Epoch

Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Yahoo News 27 Jan 08;

Humans have altered Earth so much that scientists say a new epoch in the planet's geologic history has begun.

Say goodbye to the 10,000-year-old Holocene Epoch and hello to the Anthropocene.

Among the major changes heralding this two-century-old man-made epoch:
Vastly altered sediment erosion and deposition patterns. Major disturbances to the carbon cycle and global temperature. Wholesale changes in biology, from altered flowering times to new migration patterns. Acidification of the ocean, which threatens tiny marine life that forms the bottom of the food chain.

The idea, first suggested in 2000 by Nobel Prize-winning chemist Paul Crutzen, has gained steam with two new scientific papers that call for official recognition of the shift.

Vivid metaphor

In the February issue of the journal GSA Today, a publication of the Geological Society of America, Jan Zalasiewicz and Mark Williams of the University of Leicester and colleagues at the Geological Society of London argue that industrialization has wrought changes that usher in a new epoch.

Scientists of the future will have no trouble deciding if the proposal was timely. All they'll need to do is dig into the planet and examine its stratigraphic layers, which reveal a chronology of the changing conditions that existed as each layer is created. Layers can reflect volcanic upheaval, ice ages or mass extinctions.

"Sufficient evidence has emerged of stratigraphically significant change (both elapsed and imminent) for recognition of the Anthropocene — currently a vivid yet informal metaphor of global environmental change — as a new geological epoch to be considered for formalization by international discussion," Zalasiewicz's team writes.

The paper calls on the International Commission on Stratigraphy to officially mark the shift.

In a separate paper last month in the journal Soil Science, researchers focused on soil infertility alone as a reason to dub this the Anthropocene Age. (The term "age" is sometimes used interchangeably with "epoch" or to indicate a transition period between epochs.)

As an example, they said, agriculture in Africa "has so degraded regional soil fertility that the economic development of whole nations will be diminished without drastic improvements of soil management."

"With more than half of all soils on Earth now being cultivated for food crops, grazed, or periodically logged for wood, how to sustain Earth’s soils is becoming a major scientific and policy issue," said Duke University soil scientist Daniel Richter.

Richter's work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Origin of a term

Earth's 4.5-billion-year history is divided into major eras, then periods and finally epochs. The Holocene Epoch began after the last Ice Age.

As early as the late 1800s scientists were writing about man's wholesale impact on the planet and the possibility of an "anthropozoic era" having begun, according to Crutzen, who is credited with coining the term Anthropocene (anthropo = human; cene = new) back in 2000. That year, Crutzen and a colleague wrote in the scientific newsletter International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme about some of the dramatic changes:

"Urbanization has ... increased tenfold in the past century. In a few generations mankind is exhausting the fossil fuels that were generated over several hundred million years."

Up to half of Earth's land has been transformed by human activity, wrote Crutzen and Eugene F. Stoermer of the University of Michigan. They also noted the dramatic increase in greenhouse gases and other chemicals and pollutants humans have introduced into global ecosystems.

The epochal idea has merit, according to geologist Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University.

"In land, water, air, ice, and ecosystems, the human impact is clear, large, and growing,"Alley told ScienceNow, an online publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "A geologist from the far distant future almost surely would draw a new line, and begin using a new name, where and when our impacts show up."

RELATED ARTICLES

Time to stop the climate blame game

Malini Mehra, BBC News 3 Dec 07;
"Scientists have coined a term for our new age - they call it the "anthropocene" because human interference with planetary systems is affecting the very life-support systems we depend upon. They warn that we may be the last generation to live in an age of climate stability, and that we are now entering an era outside human experience."

Scarred Earth to enter the 'Anthopocene Epoch'
The Telegraph 27 Jan 08;

Humans have so altered life on Earth that scientists are proposing to change the name of the geological epoch we are living through from the Holocene to the Anthropocene.

The name, Anthropocene, was coined in an off-the-cuff remark, by the Nobel prize-winning chemist, Paul Crutzen, in 2002. He suggested that the environmental effect of increased human population and economic development meant the Earth was entering a new era.

Now the groundwork for a formal name change has been written by scientists from the Leicester University and the Geological Society of London and published for consideration by the international body charged with the naming of geological epochs.

In the article, in the journal the Geological Society of America Today, the proposers argue that the dominance of humans has so physically changed Earth that there is increasingly less justification for linking pre- and post industrialisation periods Earth history within the same epoch.

Scientists identify four major phenomena which mark a difference with the past: transformation of patterns of sediment erosion and deposition worldwide; major changes to the carbon cycle and global temperature; wholesale changes to the world's plants and animals; ocean acidification (through the build up of fossil fuels in the atmosphere).

The scientists, led by Jan Zalasiewicz at the department of geology at Leicester, say: "Sufficient evidence has emerged of stratigraphically significant change for recognition of the Anthropocene - currently a vivid yet informal metaphor of global environmental change - as a new geological epoch."

They are proposing to the International Commission on Stratigraphy that the name is formalised after an international discussion.

Until now the interglacial period we are living through, which began 9600 years BC, has been known as the Holocene. This is Greek for the "entirely recent" period. The whole of human civilisation fits into the Holocene period. The Holocene itself is part of the Neocene and Quaternary periods.

Arguments are now likely to revolve around whether the name Anthropocene should apply to the whole period formerly considered the Holocene, or whether it should be a period dating from the start of the Industrial Revolution.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 28 Jan 08


Pricing nature: an outmoded way of thinking of nature
more comments on the nature scorned blog about the article on Euston Quah in “Economics don offers unique perspective on Nature Conservation”

Little countries can make a difference
a little wish for the year of the rat on the champions of the environment blog

Nemo still on Sentosa!
and other marinelife on the wonderful creations blog

A sparrowhawk crash-landed in Hougang
from the bird ecology blog

Snake versus frog
amazing photos on the wonderful creations blog

Abalones for Lunar New Year?
find out more on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

Butterfly watching at Alexandra hospital
wonderful winged things on the manta blog

NParks Floraweb
An online plant reference system featuring pictures of and information on more than 1900 plants to make gardening easier and more enjoyable for all.

Green Tip #6 - Avoid printing ATM receipts
millions of slips can be saved from the AsiaIsGreen blog

Everyday Environmentalist
Remember when "environmentalist" meant…recycling? It's not so simple anymore. Being an environmentalist today calls for a whole new level of greener thinking. Lots of tips and ideas on the nature conservancy website.

US launch of International Year of the Reef
with sombre news, but still things one person can do on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog


Read more!

Volunteers needed at EcOasis

Looking for Volunteers: EcOasis - Getting your hands dirty
Wilson Ang, ECO-Singapore blog 28 Jan 08;

From now till the completion of EcOasis in April 08, we need 10-15 volunteers to help with the trials and construction including:

o Rainwater-Harvesting
o Green roofs & walls
o Bio-diesel
o Grey-water recycling
o Recyclable Living Space

Volunteers will need to commit about 2-4 hours per week for these two months. No prior knowledge is required but passion for the cause is highly recommended!

To volunteer, pls email volunteer@eco-singapore.org or sms YaO @ 94233204.

What is EcOasis?

EcOasis is a showcase for environmental technologies. Located in the Eco Garden of the Singapore Science Centre, the EcOasis will be useful as an educational platform for casual visitors or teachers bringing their students for field trips.
In addition, the EcOasis will also be part of ECO Singapore's Enrich! Programme on environmental sustainability. This program aims to instill the fundamentals of sustainable living and motivate the participants to start taking actions in their daily lifestyle.


Read more!

Rare victory for Madagascar tortoises

Jonny Hogg, BBC News 28 Jan 08;

Conservationists are celebrating a double victory over tortoise smugglers in Madagascar.

Earlier this month, a Nigerian man was arrested with 300 tortoises and another 20 have been returned to their habitat after being seized on a neighbouring island.

But campaigners' relief might not last long. The live animal trade, particularly in reptiles, is big business.

The island's unique wildlife, which makes it so exciting for conservationists, also attracts financial interest.

The haul of 300 seized from a house after a tip-off may be the largest in the world, conservationists say.

Collectors could have netted as much as $200,000 (£100,000) for them in exotic pet markets.

"Of course I am very happy that the tortoises are still in Madagascar," says Hasina Randriamanampisoa of the Durrell Wildlife Trust.

"But on the other hand I am very frustrated because it means they are still leaving the country."

Global trade

Eight of the tortoises saved were of the rarest species in the world.

Conservationists believe that only about 1,000 of these ploughshare tortoises remain.

They are found in a small area of north-western Madagascar, and the loss of even a small number would be devastating, conservationists say.

According to the Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, the ploughshare will be extinct within 10 years if they continue to disappear at the same rate.

It is a global trade. The Nigerian man, who faces up to 10 years if he is convicted, was found with three passports with three different names from three different countries.

The reptiles could have been bound for rare animal markets in Bangkok, Thailand, conservationists say.

Although tortoises are protected, some species are still eaten in parts of the country, but the real risk lies from international collectors.

To buy a tortoise to eat might cost $10 (£5). To buy one as a pet might cost you $10,000 (£5,000).

"Why do people do it? If you're talking about Malagasy people they are poor, so they can easily be attracted by big bucks from the smugglers," says Mr Randriamanampisoa.

"As far as foreigners are concerned, well I can imagine, some people are so rich they just want something rare in their possession.

"It has something to do with their mind, to possess something that no-one else has."

Cat and mouse

Felicitee Rejo Fienena, who works for the government in southern Madagascar, wants more to be done to protect wildlife.

"If buyers continue to exist on the international market, then collectors will continue to exist in Madagascar," she says.

"Therefore on that point there must be really strong collaboration. On the ground here we're already on alert, we're already mobilised but we must be able to react quickly if we're to get positive results."

The game of cat and mouse between the collectors and the authorities continues.

People trying to protect the tortoises here are wary of advertising the sheer value of the trade for fear of attracting even more fortune-hunters to the island.

On the other hand, if they do not draw attention to the threat the trade causes, for certain species their desirability may lead to their extinction.

THE PLOUGHSHARE TORTOISE

  • Latin name: geochelone yniphora
  • Called angonoka by the Malagasy
  • Live in clearings in woods near bamboo forests
  • Gets the name ploughshare because of a protruding scoop under the head
  • Males use the scoop to wrestle other males during courtship
  • They also use the scoop to turn the female over during mating
  • Hatchlings are 3cm long
  • Juveniles can take 20 years to reach sexual maturity
  • There are less than 1,000 left in the wild
  • The Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust has bred 250 in captivity - 40 have been returned to the wild
  • In 1996, 73 tortoises worth $3m (£1.5m) were stolen from a breeding centre on Madagascar
Source: www.wildscreen.org.uk


Read more!

Researchers seek animal test alternative

Michael Hill, Associated Press Yahoo News 27 Jan 08;

The lab rat of the future may have no whiskers and no tail — and might not even be a rat at all.

With a European ban looming on animal testing for cosmetics, companies are giving a hard look at high-tech alternatives like the small, rectangular glass chip professor Jonathan Dordick holds up to the light in his lab at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

The chip looks like a standard microscope slide, but it holds hundreds of tiny white dots loaded with human cell cultures and enzymes. It's designed to mimic human reactions to potentially toxic chemical compounds, meaning critters like rats and mice may no longer need to be on the front line of tests for new blockbuster drugs or wrinkle creams.

Dordick and fellow chemical engineering professor Douglas Clark, of the University of California, Berkeley, lead a team of researchers planning to market the chip through their company, Solidus Biosciences, by next year. Hopes are high that the chip and other "in vitro" tests — literally, tests in glass — will provide cheap, efficient alternatives to animal testing.

No one expects the chips to totally replace animals just yet, but their ability to flag toxins could spare animals discomfort or death.

"At the end of the day, you have fewer animals being tested," said Dordick.

Medical advances ranging from polio vaccines to artificial heart valves owe a debt to legions of lab rats, mice, rabbits, dogs monkeys and pigs. Animals — mostly mice — are still routinely used to test the toxicity of chemical compounds.

Animal testing also still has an essential role in making sure new pharmaceutical products are safe and effective for humans, said Taylor Bennett, senior science adviser to the National Association for Biomedical Researchers. Animal studies generally are needed before the federal Food and Drug Administration will approve clinical trials for a drug.

"The technology is not yet there to go from idea to patient application without using animals," Bennett said.

Animal testing can be slow, though, and some researchers question how well an animal's response to a chemical can predict human reactions.

In addition, the public is increasingly queasy about animal testing, especially the idea of inflicting pain for products like new lipsticks or eye shadows. The movement against animal testing has been especially strong across the Atlantic, where the European Union is set to enact its ban on animal testing for cosmetics in March 2009.

Cosmetics companies have greatly reduced animal testing, though they still may use it to test the safety of a new ingredient, said John Bailey, executive vice president of the Personal Care Products Council, an industry group.

Alternatives to animal tests include synthetic skin substitutes and computer simulations. But in vitro products show the most promise because they can are efficient, fast and easy to manipulate, said Dr. Alan Goldberg, director of the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing at Johns Hopkins University.

"There's no question that it's the strategy of the future," Goldberg said.

Bailey agrees that in vitro chips hold the most promise, but said the chips still need to be validated before companies can have more confidence in them. He noted that chips have limitations when it comes to risk assessment, such as determining if particular doses of a substance pose a cancer risk.

The product developed by Dordick and Clark consists of two glass slides. The first, called the MetaChip, has rows of little blots containing human liver enzymes. The other slide, the DataChip, contains an identical array of blots which, depending on the test, could be live human bladder, liver, kidney, heart, skin or lung cell cultures. Sandwiched together, the two chips mimic the human body's reaction to compounds.

If the cells die or stop growing, it's a sign that a toxin was present.

Troy-based Solidus has received about $3 million in federal money, including grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Dordick said a pharmaceutical company and a cosmetic company are testing the chip and they hope Solidus will have a product on the market by late 2009.

Goldberg notes that the movements toward in vitro and away from animal testing is incremental — even optimistic assessments measure progress in decades. But he still believes there may well be a day when the lab rat becomes a thing of the past.

"At some time in the far future my suspicion is yes," he said, "because we're doing it stepwise by stepwise."


Read more!

Save coral reefs for future generations

Statement on International Year of the Reef by The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund and Conservation International.

Stephanie Meeks, Carter Roberts and Peter Seligmann
Miami Herald 25 Jan 08;

Coral reefs are more than just aesthetic pleasures. Home to a rich diversity of marine life, these ocean habitats are central to the economies of many developing nations and to the livelihoods of coastal communities around the world.

Realizing the value of this aquatic currency, representatives of 17 countries and 30 organizations met in Washington, D.C., on Thursday to officially launch 2008 as the "International Year of the Reef".

Yet this celebratory label may come too soon, because at the current pace of global warming the great majority of our planet's tropical reefs will virtually disappear during the next 50 years.

Overfishing, pollution and reef destruction have been diminishing the health and viability of the world's corals for decades, and the increase in ocean temperatures can destroy huge areas of coral reefs through bleaching -- a stress response that causes a coral to lose its colorful and symbiotic algae. At the same time, rising levels of carbon dioxide create greater ocean acidity, which could prevent coral reefs from forming and growing.

The return on investment in coral reef conservation is unparalleled, but so is the detriment that would result from the disappearance of these ecosystems. Covering just 1 percent of the planet, coral reefs support over one million species and provide services essential to human-well being -- nutrition, enhanced protection from storms and tourism revenue.

One in six people worldwide depends on fish as their primary source of protein, but with every 5 percent loss of coral reefs up to 500,000 tons of fish are lost. Coral reefs also generate $375 billion per year in goods and services, more than $4 billion of which comes from Florida, where bleaching, disease, over-fishing and declining water quality have caused a more than 90 percent decline in the populations of magnificent staghorn coral that attract so many tourists to the state each year.

The good news is that with increased international investments in the protection and restoration of coral reefs, we can stop their devaluation right now. Scientists and conservationists are discovering and applying new ways to help coral reefs resist and recover from bleaching. We know how to make fishing more sustainable while still providing food and jobs. Recent studies show that marine protected areas can protect coral reef ecosystems and produce benefits for people, many of them in poor coastal communities around the globe.

The three largest conservation organizations worldwide -- The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International and World Wildlife Fund -- recently doubled our financial investments in marine conservation, believing the value of such capital will only increase. We are also committed to slowing the pace of global warming through on-the-ground conservation projects, education and policy initiatives, and we realize that any legislation aimed at reducing carbon emissions will also benefit the health of the world's coral reefs. Yet despite our commitment to work together for the protection of coral reefs, our efforts will not succeed without increased funding and support for coral reef protection from the U.S. government.

There are a number of opportunities that deserve action now.

• Congress should pass and the president should sign the reauthorized Coral Reef Conservation Act and ensure that it is adequately funded to guarantee the continuation of proven coral reef conservation programs and activities and meet the goals of our National Coral Reef Action Strategy.

• Priority should also be given to the expansion of ''Debt for Nature Swaps'' under the Tropical Forest Conservation Act to allow financing for coral protection.

• Increased financial and technical support is also needed to assist U.S. states, territories and other coastal nations involved in coral reef restoration and research, to expand programs at a range of federal agencies including NOAA and the Department of Interior and to provide U.S. scientific and managerial expertise to developing countries committed to conserving coral reefs.

We are inspired by the leadership of President Tommy E. Remengesau Jr. of Palau, who sparked the ''Micronesia Challenge'' to protect 20 percent and 30 percent of the region's oceans and forests, respectively, by 2020. And we are motivated by government officials attending the Climate Change Conference in Bali in December. They launched the ''Coral Triangle Initiative'' to safeguard the world's richest coral reef ecosystems in the waters of Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia and neighboring island nations.

As the presidential candidates on both sides discuss a growing American desire for change and inspiration, we ask the current U.S. government to follow in the footsteps of these global leaders and to invest in these tangible opportunities that will grant future generations the chance to experience the wonder, beauty and plenty of coral reefs -- the ocean's greatest assets.

Stephanie Meeks is acting president and CEO of The Nature Conservancy; Carter Roberts is president of World Wildlife Fund; and Peter Seligmann is chairman and CEO of Conservation International.


Read more!

Britain 'facing energy shortfall' in 5-7 years

Richard Black, BBC News 27 Jan 08;

Britain is likely to face a shortfall in electricity generation within five to seven years, a report concludes.

Energy and environment consultancy firm Inenco says that the number of nuclear and coal plants coming out of service over the period makes shortages likely. Old coal plants, whose operating hours are limited under European legislation, have been running more than expected because of higher gas prices.

But other analysts say new plants can be built quickly and shortages avoided.

Earlier this month, the government announced it was prepared to approve applications to build new nuclear reactors, but anticipates it would be 10 years before they came on stream.

"With the recent announcement about new nuclear stations, there seemed to be a collective sigh of relief," said Inenco's deputy managing director Michael Abbott.

"We believe that demand overtakes supply somewhere between 2012 and 2015, creating a serious 'generation gap'."

In its report, to be released later this week, Inenco warns that in the extreme case, shortages could materialise around the time of the London Olympics in 2012.

Burning hours

By that time, the last of the ageing fleet of Magnox nuclear reactors will have closed.

More importantly, a number of older coal-fired stations may also have closed.

Under the European Large Combustion Plants Directive (LCPD), aimed at curbing pollutants such as sulphur dioxide, power units built before 1987 must either be modified with modern emissions control equipment, or operate only for a total of 20,000 hours between 2008 and 2015, when they must come out of service completely.

When the legislation was drawn up in 2001, it was assumed that the old, unmodified plants would operate only at times of high demand.

But recent rapid hikes in the price of gas have induced companies to run them for longer periods.

Government figures show a 25% rise in coal burning for electricity generation between 2000 and 2006.

If the trend continues, the unmodified plants are likely to use up their permitted hours much sooner than expected, and have to close.

Inenco calculates that the capacity of coal and nuclear units likely to come out of service before 2012 totals more than 10 gigawatts (GW).

That would eliminate about one-seventh of Britain's total capacity. The first closures of Britain's second generation of nuclear stations, the advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGRs), and the demise of the remaining large oil-fired stations would be due within a further three years.

Small options

The most obvious way to fill this "energy gap" would be to build new gas-fired power stations; but Inenco doubts this will happen quickly enough.

"For the plants to be operational by 2012, they would have to be given the go-ahead immediately and suffer no delays - a highly unlikely scenario considering we would need between eight and 10 of them," said Mr Abbott.

"The other point to consider is that it is unlikely energy producers will be keen to invest in a technology that they know is going to be second best when the new nuclear plants come on line."

Rob Gross from Imperial College London, head of policy and technology assessment at the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC), believes Inenco is presenting a worst-case scenario.

"For black-outs to occur, pretty much everything would have to go wrong," he said.

"It's important to remember that during the 'dash for gas', between around 1992 and 2000, around 25GW of new capacity was built, so there is no reason to expect that new gas plant cannot be constructed quickly."

Currently, he said, gas plants with a combined capacity of about 7GW are going through the consent procedure. About 6GW of wind capacity is either in construction or approved, according to the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA).

"Perhaps studies such as this will help issue a 'wake up' call that makes new build and other measures happen more quickly," observed Dr Gross.

Other options for filling the energy gap would include making greater use of the large number of small generators that the National Grid can call on in time of shortage, and extending the use of contracts that allow the grid to interrupt supply to industrial customers at peak periods.

Even if the gap is plugged, Inenco predicts the price of electricity in the years ahead will be higher and more variable than at present.



Read more!