Best of our wild blogs: 13 May 09


Probably the best mainland reef?
on the wonderful creation blog and Exploring Tanah Merah. Also on the wild shores of singapore blog and psychedelic nature blog.

Seeing Stars on a Siloso Shore on Sunday
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog and finds with spines.

Nudibranchs and the power of the sun in their tentacles
on lekowala!

18 May (Mon): Talk on "Healthy Marine Life, Sustainable Seafood and You!" on the wild shores of singapore blog

Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker and mistletoe
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Sleeping In The Rain
on the Manta Blog

International Museum Day 2009
on Otterman speaks

The Phenology of Dioecious Figs in Singapore
on the Raffles Museum News blog

Malabar Pied Hornbills locking bills
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog


Read more!

Palm oil: Boon and bane for the environment

Grace Chua, Straits Times 13 May 09;

JUST as the world is looking for alternative fuels that do not add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere when burned, palm oil seems to have stepped up to the plate.

After all, biodiesel made from the fruit of the oil palm produces 40 per cent less greenhouse gases than petrol when burned.

But the downside to oil palm plantations is that natural forests are being cleared to make way for them, and when these forests go, so do the plant and animal species native to them.

Balancing the gains and losses of oil palm cultivation was the focus of industry players, scientists and non-governmental organisations gathered for a conference at the National University of Singapore (NUS) yesterday.

The conference, titled Biofuels: The Impact of Oil Palm on Forests and Climate, was organised by NUS and the Environmental Leadership and Training Initiative - a collaboration between Yale University and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI).

The issue before the participants is particularly relevant to Malaysia and Indonesia, which together produce about 80 per cent of the world's palm oil.

Last year, Malaysia produced almost 22 million tonnes of this oil, worth $27 billion; Indonesia is fast catching up.

Besides its use as a biofuel, palm oil is also a source of food and an ingredient in the cosmetic industry, among others.

Singapore biologist Koh Lian Pin told the conference participants that between 1990 and 2005, between 55 per cent and 59 per cent of Malaysia's new oil palm plantations were developed on cleared forest land. This amounted to between 0.8 million ha and 1.1 million ha. Indonesia, too, gave up more than half of its forests to oil palm plantations.

Dr Koh, now a research fellow at Swiss technological institute ETH Zurich, also made a count of the number of bird and butterfly species in oil palm estates, and found that the plantations hosted just a quarter of the number of plant and animal species of primary forests.

Dr William Laurance of the STRI, the conference keynote speaker, said that given the pressing need for alternatives to fossil fuels, more could be done to reduce the harmful results of oil palm cultivation.

Forests should not be cleared for this, he declared.


Read more!

$3,000 fine for feeding monkeys

Straits Times 13 May 09;

A HOUSEWIFE was fined $3,000 yesterday for feeding sweets to wild monkeys at a nature reserve in Mandai.

Xiao Lexiang, 37, admitted to having thrown sweets from a vehicle at the monkeys at the Central Catchment Nature Reserve along the Old Upper Thomson access road on Feb 23 last year.

She was caught in the act by Certis Cisco officers doing their inspection rounds at the nature reserve that afternoon.

In May last year, High Court judge V.K. Rajah stated while hearing an appeal that all future such offenders would be fined $3,000 as a starting point. The fines could be higher or lower, depending on the circumstances of each case.

The judge said there was a need to send a clear message that feeding monkeys increases the risk of them behaving aggressively.

Xiao could have been fined up to $50,000 and/or jailed for up to six months.


Read more!

Setting the table for a smarter food system

We need to make food affordable and its production more sustainable and efficient
Lim Teck Chang, Business Times 13 May 09;

HOW do we put food on our tables? Once, people simply relied on their local farmers. Today, we depend on a global web of growers, fisheries, packers, shippers, manufacturers, retailers as well as government and industry bodies.

As the world becomes smaller and 'flatter', countries that at one time seemed distant are now primary sources of our food supply. Many of those countries do not have consistent standards for quality, process and accountability. Additionally, this complex system impacts and is impacted by other global systems - from energy to climate to health care to trade.

The result is a whole host of inefficiencies arising from issues of scarcity, safety, sustainability and cost. And an opportunity for our food system to get a lot smarter.

We need to make sure our food system is safe. In the United States alone, 76 million cases of food-borne illnesses occur each year. Imports account for nearly 60 per cent of the fruit and vegetables we consume and 75 per cent of the seafood. Yet only one per cent of those foods are inspected before they cross our shores.

In China, too, more are scrutinising what they consume. A new IBM study reveals erosion of trust and confidence in food retailers and manufacturers grows internationally; with 84 per cent of Chinese consumers more concerned with food quality issues than they were two years ago and two-thirds wanting more information about food source/content.

This is not surprising since product contaminations and food recalls have become more commonplace across the globe. Melamine - a toxic chemical widely used to make plastics and glue - was recently found in Chinese infant formula and sickened more than 294,000 people, according to reports from China's Ministry of Health. The scope of the problem quickly multiplied to include a wide range of products containing milk sourced from China. As a result, sales of staple products, such as milk, chocolate, ice cream, candy and more have plunged worldwide.

Cold chain supply

For those living and working in Singapore, we are in the good hands of the local government. The Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) works hard to ensure a resilient supply of safe food, safeguard the health of animals and plants and facilitate agri-trade for the well-being of the nation. The AVA website is a treasure chest of useful information. From food safety education, product recall alerts, food facts, food safety resources, treatment of frozen meat to cold chain systems, the AVA keeps us abreast of the latest in food safety.

In the early 2000s, IBM Singapore assisted with Singapore's development of a cold chain study, together with Singapore Polytechnic and the Singapore Manufacturers' Federation (SMa), formerly known as the Singapore Manufacturers' Association. We examined the cold chain supply for milk products, ensuring the milk products from distributors all the way to the supermarket shelves stayed below 4° Celsius. This was a project driven by Tan Jin Soon, the current executive director of SMa's GS1 Singapore Council. The Singapore Cold Chain Centre was set up by the SMa and intended to be a resource centre for Singapore and the Asian region with the mission to provide technical expertise in the cold chain management within the manufacturing process as well as in the cold chain management for logistics.

To contribute to the development of Singapore as a cold chain hub of the region, the Singapore Cold Chain Centre runs training programmes to train a pool of skilled workforce with good knowledge of cold chain management to ensure the quality of the products including milk and dairy products and chilled pork throughout the entire supply chain.

Pet food, lettuce, peanut butter, baby food and milk - these are just some of the high-profile recalls we've seen of late causing consumers worldwide to be worried.

Is their food safe? And where did it come from? One solution is track and trace technology, including 2D and 3D barcode and radio frequency identification (RFID) which allows us to track food from 'farm to fork'. And now government regulations and industry requirements for quality and traceability are driving food producers worldwide to provide more detail on products.

With an increasingly global supply chain, that detail must be comprehensive and reliable. And with that detail, companies can realise added value as well, such as a streamlined distribution chain and lower spoilage rates. In fact, consumer product and retail industries lose about US$40 billion annually, or 3.5 per cent of their sales, due to supply chain inefficiencies.

The average meal has been through a complex supply chain by the time it reaches the dinner table. Dozens of companies are involved in the production of just a single rib eye steak.

In the Canadian province of Manitoba, IBM helped develop full traceability solution, providing business consulting and project management services, working more than 16 supply chain partners, including beef and pork producers, animal feed ingredient producers, feed manufacturers, farmers, processing plants, truckers and a retail grocery chain.

Using Global Traceability Network (GTNet) software from IBM Business Partner TraceTracker, Manitoba's project shows it is possible to securely and accurately gather and crunch data about a piece of meat from a variety of sources and share that information, at any step in the process.

Butchers at Germany's METRO Future Store do more than dress roasts. They also apply RFID smart labels in a solution designed with IBM. Each package is identified and recorded when it is placed into the refrigerated display case, which is fully equipped with readers and antennas to scan the label of each product as it goes in, as it sits on the shelf and as it goes back out with a consumer. The information helps the store maintain fresh products, control the environment in which they are stored and manage inventory levels with real-time sales data.

Avoiding losses

We need food to be affordable. As mentioned above, consumer product firms and retailers lose US$40 billion annually, or 3.5 per cent of their sales, due to supply chain inefficiencies. And the true cost of food production can't always be captured in dollars. Sixty years ago, we could create a calorie of food with less than half a calorie of fossil fuel. Today, a single calorie of modern supermarket food requires 10 calories of fossil fuel to produce. And we need to make food more sustainable and efficient. Rising fuel costs are making it increasingly difficult to get enough food to the populations that have come to depend on distant producers. At the same time, 30 per cent of the food purchased in developed nations ends up going to waste.

Trying to manage these problems in isolation is no longer an option. Fortunately, a smarter global food system - one that is more connected, instrumented and intelligent - is at hand. In addition to the above-mentioned RFID technology to trace food from the farm through the supply chain to the store shelf, IBM is also collaborating with some of the world's leading retailers and manufacturers to create software solutions that can more efficiently integrate product demand with supply replacements, and help dramatically cut time, cost, waste and out-of-stock conditions.

And in response to the global hunger crisis, IBM scientists are helping to develop stronger strains of rice that could produce crops with much larger, more nutritious yields.

A smarter food system means end-to-end visibility across the entire global supply chain. So scarce resources can be more thoughtfully managed. So people can have more confidence in the quality of their food. So the whole world can put healthy meals on the table.

The writer is an associate partner of IBM Global Business Services in Singapore


Read more!

Stemming the Tide of Marine Waste with Market-Based Instruments

UNEP 13 May 09;

Manado/Nairobi, 13 May 2009 – From paying fishermen to 'fish for litter' to laws banning food vendors from using plastic cups and plates in coastal parks, governments and local authorities around the world are increasingly turning to market-based instruments to cut litter and waste entering the sea.

These are among the findings from a new UN Environment Programme (UNEP)-commissioned report presented today at the World Oceans Conference in Indonesia, where over 120 nations are gathering to boost the health of the global marine environment.

In the US, for example, food vendors in national public parks are required to use biodegradable plates, cups, and other disposable food containers and discouraged from distributing straws with drinks unless specifically requested by the customer.

In Hawaii, US, an initiative that gives fishermen cash awards by the weight of abandoned gear they report resulted in nearly 75 tonnes of debris removed over a two-year period.

A levy of US$ 0.02 (€0.15) per plastic bag in Ireland generated nearly US$ 13 million (€9 million) and led to a 90 per cent reduction in consumption of disposable plastic bags. The money generated was channelled into environmental initiatives in the country.

These types of incentives create opportunities for policy makers to exercise their political will, given that they are able to generate the necessary funds to implement an environmental plan.

A private-public partnership in Honolulu saw the collection of nearly 26 tonnes of net and monofilament line, which were processed and converted into electric power.

In South Korea, cost sharing between cities and payment to fishermen were used to tackle marine litter.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: "Smart market mechanisms, from feed-in tariffs to stimulate renewable energies to paying communities for ecosystem services can transform the economics of sustainability."

"Today we present evidence that the same approach can be brought to bear in the area of marine litter underlining yet another area where a Green Economy can be glimpsed and one day soon realized," he added.

Marine debris damages marine industries, but is also an economic cost to society and the environment. Globally, as much as 80 per cent of marine debris entering the ocean each year is thought to come from land-based sources, with the remainder coming from shipping and other maritime sources.

The report made a number of recommendations to address the problem. These include measures to:

Invest in the waste management infrastructure – from the smallest items (waste cans conveniently located by beaches and piers) to state-of-the-art landfills and environmental-friendly materials that will not persist in the environment and substitution of materials to increase degradability.

Encourage strategies that will prevent or reduce the amount of litter entering inland waterways from towns, streets, parking areas, etc. This can be done in conjunction with an educational campaign that helps people understand how all watersheds are connected, and how their piece of litter can impact natural resources, marine habitats, navigation, health and safety.

Create opportunities for all stakeholders (public and private sectors) to communicate, exchange information, share technological expertise, the latest marine litter research, guidelines, and successes.

Build a stronger sense of environmental stewardship among ocean users as well as people who live inland through education and community outreach. This ethic is critical given the global nature of marine litter, its inability to be confined within territorial boundaries and the complexity of identifying sources.

Enhance and encourage collaboration among NGOs, industry, governments, citizens, academia, fisheries management organizations, local communities and municipalities. A variety of partners bring different skills and resources to the table, leading to a stronger foundation for success.

Support and promote voluntary efforts to remove litter from the marine environment (e.g., beach and river clean-up events)

Deposits-refund systems, user and administrative charge, and sales taxes and cost sharing are among market-based instruments cited as most suitable in controlling marine debris.

More links
UNEP marine litter pagehttp://www.unep.org/regionalseas/marinelitter/


Read more!

Disaster looms with rising sea levels: islands

Yahoo News 12 May 09;

MANADO, Indonesia (AFP) – Rising sea levels that could wipe whole nations off the map and displace scores of millions of people are being overlooked in global climate change talks, island countries said Tuesday.

Major emitters are pushing for greenhouse gas emissions cuts that are too low to prevent devastating sea rises, representatives said at the World Ocean Conference in Indonesia's Manado city.

"Dealing with environmental refugees will have a much more serious impact on the global economy and global security in fact than what wars have ever done to this planet," said Rolph Payet, a presidential adviser from the African island nation of the Seychelles.

Other nations under threat from even small rises in sea levels include the Pacific island states of Kiribati and Tuvalu, while heavily populated low-lying areas such as Bangladesh's coastline would also go under.

The five-day conference has attracted hundreds of officials and experts from 70 countries and is being billed as a prelude to December talks on a successor to the expiring Kyoto Protocol.

Payet said there had been "zero" serious discussions in top international forums on how to deal with massive flows of "climate refugees" from low-lying and drought-prone areas.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted in 2007 that up to 150 million people could be displaced by the effects of climate change by 2050, which include sea level rises of as much as 59 centimetres (23 inches).

The Alliance of Small Island States is pushing for 85 percent cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

But Payet said the December talks in the Danish capital Copenhagen look set to produce an emissions cut target that would be too low to avert disaster.

The European Union has promised to reduce its emissions by 80 percent by mid-century and US President Barack Obama has proposed his country make an 83 percent cut.

But the details of any global agreement that would include major developing nation emitters such as China remain unknown.


Read more!

2.5-Meter Wave Hits North Jakarta

Arientha Primanita, Jakarta Globe 13 May 09;

Thousands of homes in eight urban wards across North Jakarta were inundated with sea water on Tuesday morning, after a 2.5-meter surge of water struck upscale Pantai Mutiara housing complex in Ancol.

The wave caused a 60-meter-long portion of the complex’s 420-meter-long dam to burst.

Water levels reached up to 60 centimeters in the Penjaringan area, while State Junior High School 22 and the Kapuk Muara ward office were submerged in up to 40 centimeters of water, according to data from the Coordinating Unit for Disaster and Evacuation Management.

Due to its proximity to the dam, the Pluit area was hit hard, while the Pantai Mutiara Residence was flooded in up to 60 centimeters of water.

Irvan Amtha, head of the water management division in Jakarta’s Public Works Agency, said the dam had been temporarily patched up with sand. He said that local residents had also helped to maintain the dam.

Irvan said the dam burst early on Tuesday morning because it could not withstand the 2.5-meter high wave.

“The height of that wave was like nothing I’ve ever seen before,” he said. “Last year, waves only reached 220 centimeters.”

The dam also cracked last year, but in a different place, Irvan added.

He explained that the dam was not built to block tidal flows. Rather, it was just a long, concrete wall near the shoreline built by the developer of the Pantai Mutiara complex.

Irvan said that the developer initially wanted to construct a tidal wall, but that these plans were postponed.

City Councilor Sayogo Hendrosubroto, chairman of Commission D under the City Council, which oversees developmental and environmental issues, blamed the flood on poor maintenance of the dam.

The Jakarta city administration, he said, had yet to propose a budget to maintain the city’s dams, including the Pantai Mutiara dam.

“That dam is not well maintained,” Sayogo said.

The city was always looking out for new projects, but rarely paid attention to existing facilities, he said.

“We’re not great at maintaining projects,” he added.

Tarjuki, head of the water resources division head at the Jakarta Public Works Agency, said that the city government had the funds to maintain the city’s dams.

“The funds for that are in the emergency budget,” he said, adding that there was Rp. 2.5 billion ($242,500) in available funding for material purchases, in addition to a working fund of up to
Rp 5 billion.

Tarjuki said that the Public Works Agency had become more aware of dam-related problems, and that they would monitor the dam and actually make it higher, if necessary.

Dams along the North Jakarta shoreline average between 2.8 meters and 3.5 meters in height.

Budi Widiantoro, the head of the city’s Public Works Agency, said that the dam that burst on Tuesday morning in Pluit was the responsibility of the developer of the Pantai Mutiara housing complex, because the developer had not handed responsibility for the dam over to the city.


Read more!

Key coral reefs 'could disappear'

Lucy Williamson, BBC News 12 May 09;

The world's most important coral region is in danger of being wiped out by the end of this century unless fast action is taken, says a new report.

The international conservation group WWF warns that 40% of reefs in the Coral Triangle have already been lost.

The area is shared between Indonesia and five other south-east Asian nations and is thought to contain 75% of the world's coral species.

It is likened to the Amazon rainforest in terms of its biodiversity.

Temperature change

It's 2099, and across south-east Asia, a hundred million people are on the march, looking for food.

The fish they once relied on is gone. Communities are breaking down; economies destroyed.

That is what we can expect, says the new WWF report, if the world's richest coral reef is destroyed.

And that, it says, could happen this century.

It's billed as a worst-case scenario, but the report's chief author, Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, says it is not as bad as the future we're currently headed towards.

"Up until now we haven't realized how quickly this system is changing," says Professtor Hoegh-Guldberg.

"In the last 40 years in the Coral Triangle, we've lost 40% of coral reefs and mangroves - and that's probably an underestimate. We've fundamentally changed the way the planet works in terms of currents and this is only with a 0.7 degree change in terms of temperature.

"What's going to happen when we exceed two or four or six?"

Climate change consequences

Avoiding a worst-case scenario would need significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and better controls on fishing and coastal areas, says the report.

The Coral Triangle covers 1% of the earth's surface but contains a third of all the world's coral, and three-quarters of its coral reef species.

If it goes, an entire eco-system goes with it - and that, says Prof Hoegh-Gudberg, has serious consequences for its ability to tackle climate change.

"Pollution, the inappropriate use of coastal areas, these are destroying the productivity of ocean which is plummeting right now. That is the system that traps CO2 - 40% of CO2 goes into the ocean.

"Now if we interrupt that, the problems on planet earth become even greater," says Prof Hoegh-Gudberg.

Indonesia is hosting the World Ocean Conference this week because, it says, oceans have been neglected so far in global discussions on climate change.

It wants the issue to have a bigger profile at UN climate talks later this year.

Climate change endangers coral Triangle: WWF
Aubrey Belford Yahoo News 13 May 09;

MANADO, Indonesia (AFP) – Climate change could wipe out an ocean wilderness said to be the world's most diverse by the end of the century if nations do not drastically cut emissions, the environmental group WWF said.

Rising water temperatures, sea levels and acidity in the vast region threaten to destroy reefs in Southeast Asia's Coral Triangle, a region labelled the ocean's answer to the Amazon rainforest, the WWF report said.

Collapse of the reefs would send food production in the region plummeting by 80 percent and imperil the livelihoods of over 100 million people, forcing many to move from coastal villages to teeming cities, it warned.

"If we don't do anything, then the reefs are going to be gone by the end of this century and the impact on food security and livelihoods will be very significant," WWF Coral Triangle Initiative Network head Lida Pet Soede told AFP.

"Some of the locations in the Coral Triangle are really important areas for all sorts of fish. The migration of tuna and turtles that spawn in the Coral Triangle are not going to have a next generation."

Saving the Coral Triangle will require countries to commit to deep cuts in carbon gas emissions when they gather for global climate talks in the Danish capital Copenhagen in December to work out a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol.

Cuts of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 would be needed to avert the worst effects on the region, home to more than half the world's coral reefs and a lynchpin for ocean life in the region.

Heat-trapping carbon gases -- notably from burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas -- are blamed for warming Earth's atmosphere and driving changes to weather patterns.

Local communities and governments will also have to curb over-fishing and pollution, the WWF report said.

"If you continue down the path of the over-exploitation of resources, even if you get an incredible reduction in emissions there will still be a threat," WWF climate campaigner Richard Leck said.

The report comes as ministers and officials from over 70 countries meet in the Indonesian city of Manado for the World Ocean Conference, the first global meeting on the relationship between oceans and climate change.

Nations at the conference hope to pass a joint declaration aimed at influencing the direction of the Copenhagen talks in December.

A concurrent meeting will also see leaders from the six Coral Triangle nations -- Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, East Timor, the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea -- pass a joint plan on conserving the region.

WWF campaigner Leck said any agreement to save the Coral Triangle would help limit damage to the region, which despite gloomy forecasts would likely be among the reef regions slowest to be ravaged by climate change.

"The Coral Triangle is potentially more resilient than other coral areas around the world and what is amazing is the level of political commitment we are seeing this week," he said.

Coral Triangle at risk from climate change - WWF
Sunanda Creagh, Reuters 12 May 09;

JAKARTA, May 13 (Reuters) - Southeast Asia's biologically diverse coral reefs will disappear by the end of this century, wiping out coastal economies and sparking civil unrest if climate change isn't addressed, conservation group WWF said on Wednesday.

The Coral Triangle, a reef network that spans Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and East Timor, has more than 76 percent of the world's reef-building coral species and 35 percent of its coral reef fish species.

However, a new report commissioned by the WWF warned that much of this reef is doomed unless developed countries cut carbon emissions to 40 percent below the 1990 levels by the year 2020 and developing economies cut emissions by at least 30 percent from their current levels.

The report, based on 300 published studies and released to coincide with the World Ocean Conference in Manado, Sulawesi, warns that a do-nothing scenario will lead to a steady rise in sea temperatures, killing the coral and its dependent wildlife and hurting the livelihoods of around 100 million people.

"Unless there is some sort of miracle, it will mean aggregated poverty and when you couple it with the inundation of coastlines, you will get to the point where whole societies are destabilised," said Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the report's author and a marine expert at the University of Queensland.

The resulting food shortages and desperation could fuel radicalism and drive up illegal immigration, said Hoegh-Guldberg.

"Australia is going to have millions of people knocking on its doors," he said, adding that the loss of the reefs would gut both formal and informal fishing industries.

"The contribution of registered fisheries alone ranges from 2 to 12 percent of GDP of this region."

However, a senior official from the Indonesian Environment Ministry said a 30 percent emissions cut was unrealistic for developing nations.

"I am not sure it's possible. We can only achieve around a 17 percent cut by 2025," said Marwansyah Lobo Balia, assistant to Indonesia's environment minister.

"Of course there is a lot of coral bleaching but most of the damage we have found so far is not because of global warming but because of human activities such as pollution and fisheries that use bombs."

The WWF report also said that "the pathway that the world is on today exceeds the worst-case scenario described in this report".

"I know it sounds alarmist, but it really is alarming," said Hoegh-Guldberg.

WWF International Director General James Leape called for a strong agreement on greenhouse gas reductions at the UN Climate Conference at Copenhagen in December this year. (Editing by Sara Webb)

'Coral triangle' a global emergency
Gavin Fang, ABC News 13 May 09;

Australian scientists are warning of the possibility of a future wave of economic refugees from south-east Asia and the Pacific if one of the world's most important marine ecosystems is devastated by climate change.

The "coral triangle" is an ocean region about half the size of the United States to Australia's north that supports millions of people in coastal communities and is home to a diverse array of unique marine species.

But a report by the University of Queensland has found unchecked global warming could take a terrible toll.

The triangle's waters cover just 1 per cent of the earth's surface, yet many scientists regard the region as the Amazon of the Seas.

From Indonesia in the west to Solomon Islands in the east and the Philippines in the north, the marine environment is one of the most biologically diverse regions in the world.

More than three-quarters of the world's reef-building coral species and a third of the world's coral reef fish can be found within the waters.

But the new research shows global climate change is taking its toll.

The director of the Centre for Marine Studies at the University of Queensland, Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, says countries must act now to stave off climate change.

"If we travel down that road and we don't take action against climate change to the level that we should, we see a world about 50 years from now in which coral reefs are a remnant of what they are today," he said.

"In fact they may be actually functionally extinct. We see mangrove systems that support fisheries gone and what we see is food security plummet."

It is the loss of food stocks that has scientists like Professor Hoegh-Guldberg most concerned.

More than 150 million people, many already poor, live on the shores of the coral triangle, relying on its bounty for food.

"By the end of the century under the worst case scenario we could see as much as 90 per cent of those food resources having eroded," he said.

"You start to see that you are now destabilising human communities through the fact that there is just not enough food. So where do they go? We'll almost invariably see an increased level of pressure on Australia and New Zealand to provide the sort of intake that needs to alleviate these problems."

The authors of the Climate Change and Coral Triangle report say there needs to be an 80 per cent cut in global carbon emissions by 2050 to save the marine ecosystem.

But even that will not prevent some of the worst effects already being wrought in the coral triangle by climate change.

With that in mind leaders from 70 countries, including Australia, are meeting in Indonesia this week for the World Ocean Conference.

They will be looking to find ways to better protect the world's oceans in the post-Kyoto, climate change agreement that will take effect after 2012.

That will be negotiated in Denmark in December.

A 25 per cent cut in global emissions by 2020 is the target many countries, including Australia, have now indicated they might sign up to.

But Professor Hoegh-Guldberg remains unconvinced.

"There is no doubt that cutting Australia's emissions by 25 per cent is going to be a challenging task but it's only going to be worth it if we get down to 20 per cent of emissions by 2050," he said.

"And that's I think where we've got to go. We've got to show real action that shows we are progressing to decarbonise our economy as quickly as possible.

"I think we've got to take this issue as a global emergency and we are not doing that."


Read more!

Time to protect our oceans by Achim Steiner

UNEP 12 May 09;
Editorial first Published on 11 May by Antara, the Indonesian news service
By Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and Executive Director UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

Manado, 12 May 2009 - As more than 120 nations gather in Manado, Indonesia for the World Oceans Conference the issue of climate change should be high on their minds.

The world's oceans and seas are now understood to be the biggest sink of greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels.

Indeed experts now estimate that up to 40 per cent of the C02 entering the atmosphere is being cycled through the marine environment, thus playing a crucial role in moderating climate change.

But experts are warning that the marine realm cannot continue to soak up man-made pollution forever without consequences.

Many marine living creatures, from corals and crabs to plankton at the base of the food chain, need seawater that is alkaki to build their skeletons.

The average pH of water at the ocean's surface has now fallen from 8.16 to 8.05 since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution?small falls, but with potentially huge impacts if this continues.

Faced with this rapidly emerging science, the question is then what to do.

Firstly, governments must affirm their determination to 'Seal the Deal' in Copenhagen at the UN climate convention meeting in order to begin steering the world onto a low carbon course.

Secondly, we have to improve the health of our oceans.

They have to be as fit and resilient as possible, so that they can cope with the climate change burden- so they can continue to provide us with food and the myriad of other economically-important services.

This means governments have to urgently address the multiple challenges weakening our seas, from land based pollution and discharges from ships up to overexploitation of the globe's vital fisheries, fuelled in large part by perverse and wasteful subsidies totalling up to $35 billion a year.

Currently somewhere around 12 per cent of the land is held in protected areas, but less one per cent of the marine environment enjoys such status?so this needs to change, and to change fast too.

Meanwhile pollution levels, 80 per cent of which come from factories, cities and farms on the land, also need to be cut.

More than 60 countries have now developed national action plans under the voluntary UNEP initiative called the Global Programme of Action (GPA) for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Sources and we have 18 Regional Seas agreements now operating across the globe.

It is a start, but to date the magnitude of the global response still fails to reflect the challenge as evidenced by the growing number of 'dead zones'?de-oxygenated areas of sea linked with fertilizer and sewage-run alongside emissions from cars and shipping that now number 200...

Ways of boosting the health of the oceans should be a key issue in Manado in recognition of the importance of our seas in buying humanity much needed breathing space with respect to climate change.

Indeed perhaps it should now be pay back time. Firstly, investments in adaptation should not end at the shoreline-investing in the rehabilitation, rejuvenation and resilience of coastal ecosystems, from mangroves to coral reefs and wetlands, can generate significant returns in respect to climate-proofing economies.

These include protecting vulnerable communities against storms surges and sea level rise while also helping to soak up greenhouse gas emissions; filter pollution and improve the health of fisheries.

And perhaps, just over the horizon, there is an even bigger prize?a way to make the oceans part of the carbon market options.

Consider the history of forests. The suggestion that developing countries should be paid for not cutting down trees was dismissed over ten years ago as flawed.

But in Copenhagen there is a good chance that part of the deal will include forest payments to tropical nations including Indonesia. Eventually other land-based ecosystems may also be considered from peat lands to soils.

The oceans' play a vast role in countering climate change ? they are our 'blue' forests.

Rewarding countries that sustainably manage them to boost their climate combating role and productivity would seem well worth exploring-Manado is an opportunity and the forum to float such ideas.

Time to combat change is bubbling away fast. We need all hands on deck to turn this climate ship around from investments in energy savings and low, and zero carbon technologies to markets that promote healthy ecosystems?forests for sure and perhaps our oceans and our seas too.


Read more!

Police Arrests Environmentalists During World Ocean Conference

Tempo Interaktif 12 May 09;

TEMPO Interactive, Jakarta: Manado Police arrested two environmetal activists after a rally during the World Ocean Conference in Malalayangan beach North Sulawesi on Monday (11/5). Berry Nadian Forqan and Erwin Usman of Indonesia Friends of the Earth were threatened to be charged for preventing police duties after being questioned for about nine hours on Monday.

The organisation was one among 14 environmental organisations that organised rally of hundreds of fishermen near the beach to call for the conference to produce policies that ensure protection for traditional fishermen.

The conference, attended by around 72 countries, was started on Monday and will be concluded on Friday.

FERY FIRMANSYAH | CORNILA DESYANA | EKO ARI WIBOWO | MARIA HASUGIAN

Indonesia to deport activists over ocean protest
Yahoo News 12 May 09;

JAKARTA (AFP) – Indonesia will deport 15 Philippine activists on Tuesday after they held a protest with local fisherman near the venue of a global conference on ocean conservation, officials said.

Police broke up the demonstration Monday at a beach near Manado, Sulawesi island, where the World Oceans Conference is under way this week.

"They didn't have any permits from police to stage a rally," immigration ministry official Pramela Pasaribu told AFP.

The activists were calling for more involvement of local stakeholders in the five-day conference, which has gathered senior officials and experts from 70 countries, she said.

Eleven men and four women from the Philippines will be sent home later Tuesday.

Rally spokesman Riza Damanik said the protest was peaceful and was held about an hour's drive from the conference venue.

"Coastal communities and fishermen are the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change. They should be involved in this conference in order to get a better result," he said.

Indonesia deports 15 Pinoy fishing activists
Inquirer 13 May 09;

MANILA, Philippines—Fifteen Filipino fishermen and fishing activists were briefly jailed as they were attending a discussion parallel to the World Ocean Conference in Manado, Indonesia, and were eventually “forced to leave” by immigration authorities and local police Tuesday.

Arsenio Tanchuling, of the Tambuyog Development Center, said he, two fellow Tambuyog members, and 11 fisher folk leaders from Kilusang Mangingisda were about to share the experience of small fishers in the middle of the May 10 to 13 conference when they were arrested and detained for 12 hours.

“It seems that there is no place for small scale fisheries in the world’s oceans,” he said.

Tanchuling said Berry Nahdian Furqan, national executive director of Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (Walhi), was also arrested.

The draft Manado Ocean Declaration, expected to be signed by conference participants on May 14, contains no mention of small scale fishers despite the fact that they make up more than 95 percent of the fishing industry and play a crucial role in managing fish stocks and coastal ecosystems, such as coral reefs, mangroves, and sea-grass beds.

Tambuyog said small-scale fishers are projected to be one of the sectors that would be hit hard by impacts of the climate change, the theme of the World Ocean Conference.

That’s why small-scale fisher leaders, led by Kilusang Mangingisda of the Philippines and the Komite Persiapan Nelayan National Indonesia drafted a rights-based development agenda for fisheries and marine resources that includes community-based coastal resources management spearheaded by small scale fisher organizations.

The agenda also includes a comprehensive technical and financial support proposal for the formulation and implementation of climate change adaptation plans in coastal communities throughout the Southeast Asian region.

Over this snub of small fishers’ concerns, Tambuyog and its allied organizations complained that they were even harassed, detained, and denied their basic human rights to be heard and to peaceful assembly.

Tambuyog and Kilusang Mangingisda both belong to the Southeast Asia Fish for Justice Network (Seafish), a regional network of fisher folk and non-government organizations conducting an International Forum on Marine and Fisheries Justice at the Kolongan Beach Indah Hotel.

Earlier, participants to this international forum held a mass action along the beach in Malalayang where Seafish criticized both the World Ocean Conference and the Coral Triangle Initiative Summit for not covering small fishers in their discussions.

Walhi and its organization in Sulawesi Untara, together with the Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan Perikanan (Kiara), hosted the discussions on small fishers, as well as the mass action.

Seafish counts among its members organizations from Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Thailand, and Malaysia.

Activists in the dock over protests
Jongker Rumteh, The Jakarta Post 13 May 09;

Indonesian Forum for the Environment (Walhi) executive director Berry Nahdian Furqon and water and food campaign manager Erwin Usman stood trial Tuesday, following their public protest of the inaugural World Ocean Conference (WOC) and Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) Summit in Manado.

They were charged with violating Article 216 of the Criminal Code on public order.

Presiding judge I Made Sukanada said the trial of the two activists would have to be postponed, pending the summoning of two witnesses put forward by the defendants' lawyer.

"They staged a rally of protest, had an oration at Malalayang Beach, and refused to desist when the police came to disband the action," he said.

"They were deemed to have caused a public disturbance."

Made added that should the activists be found guilty, they could face a maximum sentence of 20 weeks in jail.

The prosecution witness presented in Tuesday's hearing was the local police's Comr. Sudjarwoko, who testified that the event staged by Walhi violated regulations because no permit had been requested for it earlier.

"We negotiated three times, asking for proper documents, but they did not respond. They even taunted us to settle the matter in court," he said.

Outside the courthouse, dozens of protesters rallied in support of the activists.

Similar shows of solidarity also took place in Denpasar and Bengkulu.

The Walhi protest was spurred by a gathering of some 200 fishermen from 17 provinces and four Southeast Asian countries at Malalayang Beach on Monday at 9 a.m. local time (8 a.m. in Jakarta) to hear the reading of the "Manado Declaration".

Two hours later, the police broke up the gathering and arrested Berry and Erwin.

Early Tuesday, 16 Philippine activists and members of the Manado Alliance were deported for attending the "illegal activity", although some were official delegates at the WOC and CTI Summit.

In its statement, the Manado Alliance said the activists were grouped under SEAFISH, an important civil society network that has been very outspoken against injustices toward traditional fishermen in Southeast Asia.

The alliance demanded the summit take notice of its five key issues: The initiative must ensure human security from climate change impacts; the conference should be able to guarantee access and control of resources for traditional fishermen; industrial nations and multilateral financial institutions must be responsible for ecological debts caused by Indonesia's resources exploitation; bilateral and multilateral agreements issued at the summit must be able to respond to the food crisis caused by climate change; and finally, a demand for the legal settlement of problems in the ocean sector, including illegal fishing and overfishing by foreign vessels, and land-based pollution caused by foreign mining companies.


Read more!

Can marine protected areas help safeguard fisheries and coral reefs?

Alan White and Rili Djohani, The Jakarta Post 12 May 09;

That marine protected areas (MPAs) are valuable tools for protecting coral reef habitats and managing near-shore fisheries while playing an essential role in the overall conservation of marine biodiversity is not new information.

Science and experience have supported this fact for the last 20 years in the Coral Triangle countries of Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea, where various forms of MPA are being implemented to protect coral reef habitats, manage local reef-associated fisheries and generate income for local residents through improved fishing and diving tourism enterprises.

But what is not so commonly known is that simply protecting a single small MPA is not sufficient nor the end of the story.

A study presented by the Nature Conservancy (TNC) in association with authors from the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Conservation International (CI) and the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) documents the status of emerging MPA networks in Indonesia, the Philippines and Papua New Guinea as part of an effort to better understand the development and level of success in the implementation of MPA networks in the Coral Triangle region.

Since 2004, a joint initiative of these four large marine conservation organizations has built upon and drawn key lessons from MPA networks globally under the "MPA Learning Partnership" supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

In 2008, this program examined, through field visits and interview techniques, six MPA networks in the Coral Triangle.

Three of the sites were in Indonesia, namely Wakatobi National Park off Southeast Sulawesi, Karimun Jawa National Park off the northern coast of Central Java, and Berau Marine Conservation Area off East Kalimantan.

Findings reveal that perceptions suggest substantial gaps exist between the theory and practice of creating functional MPAs and MPA networks.

Across the sites surveyed in 2008, the practice of known and accepted biophysical and social science lagged substantially behind what is required to build functional and effective MPA networks.

MPA aspects that appeared to require the most attention to improve MPA network effectiveness included social management, institutional arrangements, governance and sustainable financing.

These findings depend on the context in which these MPAs are being implemented in rural areas where the economies are weak and the national government support is often not sufficient to make them function as planned.

The study determined key variables that contributed to successful management. Two common indicators of success that were tested were the degree to which fish catches increased in the MPA and the quality of the coral reef habitat (e.g. good living coral cover).

These indicators consistently and highly correlated with several independent management variables that included sustainable financing for management, clarity of MPA network rules and enforcement by community level enforcers, local skills development, involvement in management by local elected politicians, a functional management board, multi-stakeholder planning mechanisms and participatory biophysical assessments.

These variables all involve building local government and community capacity in MPA management.

All of these factors are important to make the MPAs work as planned in the protection of coral reefs and in the enhancement of fisheries.

Needless to say, these factors are not trivial and require management systems to be in place that are not common in rural areas of Indonesia or the other countries' study areas.

Sustainable financing, for instance, is not generally accessible to most government and private sector programs in rural areas, let alone MPAs.

So what is the solution to improved protection of our coastal resources based on the study?

Potential solutions explained in the study are consistently associated with the involvement of local stakeholders in the planning, decision and implementation process so they feel ownership of the MPAs.

In addition, the study shows that as local and national stakeholders gain knowledge of the importance of marine conservation and how MPAs and MPA networks contribute to their own well-being, the more likely they are to support their implementation and effectiveness. This all requires education and investment in building capacity.

While the conclusions of the study are sobering and suggest that although considerable investment has been made in MPAs and MPA networks in the Coral Triangle, management effectiveness is still poor.

There is hope with the increasing interest on the part of the CT governments in the establishment of MPA networks.

A final conclusion is that MPAs once well-managed, must be networked with other MPAs. This helps ensure multiple areas are protected and fish larvae that originate in one MPA can find places to reside in other MPAs as they drift and grow in the ocean.

Finally, networked MPAs must also include people and communities that are networked to support marine conservation at the local level.

Alan White is a senior scientist with the Nature Conservancy (TNC), and Rili Djohani is TNC coral triangle program director


Read more!

Indonesia’s Mangrove Ecosystem Needs All the Attention It Can Get

Sukristijono Sukardjo, Jakarta Globe 12 May 09;

In the Indian Ocean region, Indonesia owns the biggest mangrove ecosystem. The mangrove areas in Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Irian Jaya provide a primary source of food for millions of coastal inhabitants, and they play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance.

Mangroves release large quantities of carbon and nutrients to support aquatic food chains, as well as provide nursery habitats for fish and shellfish species that are sold commercially. They also stabilize shorelines, reduce soil erosion and buffer against extreme weather conditions, thereby reducing the vulnerability of coastal communities and nearby infrastructure.

But mangroves are under increasing threat from competing resource users, particularly from tambak (brackish water fish pond) developers who have conflicting goals and limited understanding of the functions of mangrove ecosystems or their underlying potential.

Almost two million hectares of mangroves in Indonesia are reported to have been lost, or an astoundingly alarming rate of 160,000 hectares per year. The most serious threat to the country’s mangrove ecosystem is believed to be the clearing of mangroves for the development of artisanal ponds for fish and prawn culture. Other social and environmental problems along coastal zones also contribute to the decimation of the mangroves, as a result of extending shrimp ponds into mangrove areas or forces brought about by inclement weather.

The problem of mangrove-area conversion is most serious in Sumatra, Kalimantan and Sulawesi, and has been a long-standing issue in Java. In the Aceh and South Sulawesi provinces, for instance, nearly 80 percent of the mangrove areas have paved the way for land conversion. Java, Bali, Sulawesi have lost at least half their mangrove forests in a little over 25 years. Along the Mahakam delta in East Kalimantan, irresponsible land developers have cut off large mangrove trees, while oil and other lethal chemicals from nearby oil fields have contaminated the mangrove ecosystem and affected millions of species.

Today, Mahakam faces not only the sad reality of these brazen attacks on its area, but also, ecologists say, a grim future that sees a barren, useless piece of land.

The country has been enduring this type of ecological crisis for several years now, but it is said that things will turn out worse this decade. I admit that I am fighting to save only a small fraction of Indonesian Borneo’s (or Kalimantan, which make up 70 percent of the Borneo Island) original grandeur. Still, I hope the awareness by those participating in the World Ocean Conference will address the country’s problem.

Mangrove forests have been systematically destroyed in the name of development. It has been frequently reported that the conversion of mangrove areas to shrimps ponds or tambak and other facilities represents the single largest threat to the mangrove ecosystem in the country.

The government has imposed partial bans on logging, cracked down on illegal loggers and raised timber royalties. History shows that this type of environmental rape can have far-reaching consequences. The deforestation of mangrove areas pose similar repercussions on the environment. It can lead to the salination of agricultural lands, as in the case in Indramayu in the northern coast of West Java. It can affect the amount of rainfall as well, because trees trap moisture and then re-evaporate it. Sadly, despite the warning signs, nobody seems to care.

The Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 is a prime example of how valuable mangroves can be. Reports from Aceh in North Sumatra and Nias suggest that the coastal communities protected by mangrove forests were damaged less compared to those that had a depleted mangrove ecosystem.

The encroachment of industries into the country’s mangroves is vividly illustrated in the map of Metro Jakarta. Over 42 years until 2002, the Jakarta coastal zone lost 1,102 hectares of mangrove forest, a deplorable loss given that mangroves are a natural heritage in the country’s capital.

Besides leaving a legacy to the city, mangroves in Jakarta serve a practical purpose: they prevent floods. The water level along the highway to the Soekarno-Hatta International Airport rises quickly not only because of engineering problems, but also because of the depletion of mangrove areas along the coast of Jakarta, particularly near the airport.

Campaigns to promote the importance of the mangrove ecosystem are not lacking, with billboards and posters being put up in connection with the WOC. But even though the government is aware of this environmental issue, it has failed to transform concerns from the community level into an effective national program that would save the country’s mangrove ecosystem as a whole.

Conflict of interest among stakeholders, including nongovernment associations, and concerns of who gets credit for what have hampered progress, as well as other factors like population increase, pollution along coastal zones and in aquatic habitats, epidemics and catastrophes.

With some 60 percent of Indonesia’s total population living along the country’s coastlines, these areas have the highest concentration of people. The mangrove ecosystem, as well as coral reef and seagrass, breeds animal and plant life that provide basic resources to these communities. That means natural resources are being used up faster and in turn, opens these communities to social conflict.

Mangrove ecosystems offer food sources, serving as habitats for aquatic species that are being sold commercially and at the same time used by coastal communities as their primary source of income. If the government recognizes the potential that these ecosystems bring — both from the micro (employment opportunities for local communities) and the macro standpoints — it will do its best to maintain them. Which means the government wouldn’t just rely on the short-sighted vision of converting mangroves into tambak .

The commitment made in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 has its roots in the governing council of the United Nations Environmental Program, and its declaration of the need for concerted international action for effectively conserving the world’s biodiversity. Following this tact, new forms of international cooperation reflect the country’s growing awareness that the disappearing mangroves is not only an issue of losing a national treasure but more importantly, an issue of playing an important global role in maintaining ecological balance.

As a result of the commitment made during the Rio de Janeiro summit in 1992, the world has a stake in conserving the country’s mangrove forests. In other words, this is a concern of everybody. Stakeholders need to sit down and take the matter seriously; this ecosystem can’t simply be allowed to die away and fall into exploitative hands.

The future of life on this planet captured worldwide attention during the Earth Summit in 1992 when 155 nations and states, including the European Union, signed the Convention on Biological Diversity. Humanity has long deluded itself into thinking that the mangrove shortage merely reflected problems of storms and sea flooding. Indonesia is beginning to realize that mangroves are finite and vulnerable resources, an irreplaceable commodity that must be respected and preserved.

The Manado Ocean Declaration of the WOC should be strong enough to encourage an international commitment on mangroves that would save the planet and its coastal zones.

Sukristijono Sukardjo is a professor of mangrove ecology at the Center for Oceanological Research and Development at the Indonesian Institute of Sciences.


Read more!

After `Nargis', mangrove restoration lacks vision

Maria Osbeck and Neil Powell, Jakarta Post 13 May 09;

The horrors of Cyclone Nargis a year ago, and the Asian tsunami before that, have led to renewed interest in how mangroves can limit the impacts of natural disasters.

As news images of devastated landscapes and bloated corpses appeared in the days and weeks after Nargis, environmental campaigners made their point: if Myanmar's 3,000-km coastline had kept its original fringe of mangroves, the damage would have been less. Perhaps, some of those who died - up to 140,000 people, by some counts - could have been saved.

Today most governments acknowledge the importance of mangroves in dissipating the force of storms, and tides and waves caused by extreme events like Nargis. Mangroves serve as natural nurseries and feeding grounds for three-quarters of all commercially fished species in the tropics. Their unique root systems capture sediment and prevent erosion. They also filter out pollutants that would otherwise flow into the sea.

Mangrove restoration is more popular than ever before. Following Cyclone Nargis, Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN, emphasised the role of mangroves in mitigating the impact of natural disasters. Before that, in the wake of the Asian tsunami Bill Clinton hosted a meeting in New York to launch "Mangroves for the Future", a multi-party project focusing on mangrove conservation in tsunami-affected countries. The Red Cross is funding major replantation efforts in Vietnam and Thailand, and Japanese government aid is supporting mangrove plantations across Asia.

However, many attempts at mangrove restoration are deeply flawed.

Mangroves are being planted in areas that never supported mangroves in the first place. In Thailand, for example, the government has been very supportive of mangrove restoration, but re-planting efforts often do not consider local ecosystems. Mangrove forests are part of a larger coastal ecosystem that typically includes mudflats, sea grass meadows, tidal marshes and salt pans. They may be linked with inland forests, peat lands, and freshwater rivers and streams. Approaches to mangrove restoration need to consider how new trees will affect existing ecosystems, and whether suitable sites are selected.

In Thailand mangroves have been planted on coastal mudflats, resulting in loss of habitat and feeding grounds for migratory birds, shellfish and other shore life - leading to conflicts with local fishermen who depend on the mudflats for their livelihood. Experience from the Philippines shows that the survival rate of mangroves planted in unsuitable terrain like this is very low. In Sri Lanka, it has been shown that extensive planting of mangroves in lagoon areas has led to an overall reduction in fish productivity.

Then there are issues of land rights and livelihoods linked to the restoration of mangroves, where the brackish water supports shrimp farming. Unclear land right systems and zoning of coastal areas are major challenges to the effectiveness of mangrove restoration in the long term.

The Mahakam delta in East Kalimantan has become one of the wealthiest areas of Indonesia due to local shrimp aquaculture, as well as gas exploration in areas formerly covered by mangrove.

Here, shrimp pond owners grow "organic" white-spot shrimp in large-scale, low-intensity systems with few chemical inputs - a practice that allows them to command higher market prices as compared with shrimp from high-intensive, smaller pond cultivation that is common elsewhere in Asia. This land-hungry enterprise has led to the loss of almost 80 per cent of the mangroves in the delta, despite the fact that most of the area is officially classified as a conservation zone.

Companies drilling for natural gas in the Mahakam delta are paying compensation to farmers for the loss of mangroves due to gas exploration. While only a small amount of mangrove loss is traced directly to gas exploration, the knock-on effects are far-reaching. Local people who have customary rights to stands of mangrove are now clearing new areas in the hope of being able to get money for the exercise. Others are holding on to old shrimp ponds that have become unproductive, rather than converting the land to other uses, in the hope of also being able to claim compensation. The lack of transparency and ambiguities in this process has led to conflicts between farmers and companies, in addition to losses of natural assets.

It is important to acknowledge current land use practices in designing mangrove restoration plans, in order to reduce conflicts between user groups, and to support law enforcement to limit further conversion and ensure long term sustainability of replanted areas.

The revival of interest in mangroves following the devastation of Nargis, should now be harnessed in designing and implementing programmes that contribute to sustainable coastal resource management. Such solutions must consider the livelihoods of local people, as well as incentives for them to maintain existing natural assets. Mangroves have many uses, and many people benefit from them. It would be a great pity if the current enthusiasm for mangroves should falter, due to a failure to reconcile conflicting aims.

Mangrove restoration should contribute to the ecosystem and local communities - and not merely to impressive statistics on how many trees have been planted.

The writers are researchers with the Stockholm Environment Institute in Asia


Read more!

EU seeks deep cuts in fishing quotas for 2010

Yahoo News 12 May 09;

BRUSSELS (AFP) – The European Commission on Tuesday proposed substantial cuts in fishing quotas next year over concerns that current levels are too high to sustain fish stocks.

EU Fisheries Commissioner Joe Borg supported allowable catch cuts of "at least 25 percent" for the most vulnerable species where the commission's own scientific committee is calling for fishing to be stopped altogether.

"Slow progress has been made in stock recovery since the 2002 reform" of the EU's fisheries policy, he said in a statement.

"One of the reasons for this is that fishing opportunities consistently have been set at levels which were too high for the fish stocks to sustain," he said.

As a result, more than 80 percent of EU fish stocks are now overfished, compared with a global average of 28 percent.

On the other hand, the commission is ready to adopt "a more flexible approach" for species whose stocks are not under threat, with a cut in quotas limited to 20 percent.

For stocks which have been replenished, quotas could be lifted by 25 percent.

Total Allowable Catches (TACs) are set annually for the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and the Northeast Atlantic including the North Sea.

TACs for fisheries on deep sea species are fixed every two years.

Fisheries in the Mediterranean are not managed through catch limits, except in the case of bluefin tuna.

Haggling involving the 27 EU member states, the fishing community and environmentalists should culminate in an overall deal agreed by the end of the year ahead of next year's fishing season.


Read more!

Count Down to World Environment Day by Planting a Tree and Playing your Part

UNEP 13 May 09;

Nairobi, 13 May 2009 – As World Environment Day on June 5 fast approaches, UNEP has set an ambitious tree planting target that will not only encourage world leaders to seal a climate change deal in Copenhagen, but will also support the Billion Tree Campaign.

UNEP is appealing to everyone around the world to get planting! Whether you choose to plant one tree or thousands, we'd like you to register your tree planting pledge on the Billion Tree Campaign website: www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign.

You can also let others know about your tree planting activity by registering it on the World Environment Day website: www.unep.org/wed/2009.

Some 3.1 billion trees have now been planted and the aim now is seven billion by the end of 2009.

Social networkers around the world can use their "Twitter" accounts to follow the campaign at www.twitter.com/UNEPandYou. UNEP is pledging to plant a tree for every twitter follower who joins in between now and 5 June. The goal is to engage 100,000 followers on the social networking site and, in turn, plant 100,000 trees towards UNEP's Billion Tree Campaign.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director said: "If we are to reach the goal of seven billion trees planted by the crucial UN climate convention meeting in December, UNEP needs your support from schools and associations to governments, businesses and individual citizens"

"Make the run up to WED a tree planting time, indeed make it one today-if half the people on the planet get out and plant just one sapling in May through to 5 June then the campaign is just a whisker away from success: a powerful statement too to world leaders and the need to Seal the climate Deal in less than 200 days time," he added.

Already, the World Organisation of the Scouts Movement have pledged their participation in the global tree planting drive. Priority countries for tree planting activities by Scouts include Mexico, India, South Africa, Georgia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Hungary, Philippines, Brazil and Australia. Through this initiative the Scouts hope to plant 65,000 trees or more.

The global tree planting drive is the first in a series of mass participation events planned as part of the UN-led "Seal the Deal!" campaign in the lead-up the UN climate convention meeting in Copenhagen.

As part of this campaign, UNEP is also encouraging Chinese youth to register their awareness-raising activities through Xiao Nei - a Chinese social networking site.


Read more!

Skin demand threatens Nigeria crocs

Aminu Abubakar Yahoo News 12 May 09;

KANO, Nigeria (AFP) – Business is booming at Ismail Dauda's crocodile tannery in northern Nigeria, but environmentalists fear soaring demand for skins could be driving the reptiles to extinction.

Thirty-five year-old Dauda followed his father Maifata, whose name means "The Skin Man", into the family business of tanning crocodile and python pelts when he was just 15.

At his tannery in the old part of Nigeria's main northern city of Kano dozens of workers clean and cure the skins. In a good month they look to "process" up to 20,000 animals.

"We have been tanning snake and crocodile skins here for 120 years, but in the last few years we had a boost in our business... there is more demand and there is more market for it," Dauda told AFP.

Some crocodiles are still alive when they are brought to the tannery. After their jaws are roped together, they are turned on their backs before their throats are slit.

The meat is sold to people in the south of the country and the skins, once tanned, are exported to India, Saudi Arabia and now to China, to be made into high-quality leather products such as handbags and shoes.

Processed python skin sells for four dollars a square metre, while a crocodile pelt can bring in between 40 and 170 dollars depending on its size, explained Dauda.

He took a wooden pole to stir a pit containing a putrid smelling concoction of ash, potash and soda ash in which scores of python and crocodile skins were being soaked.

"It is a fact the volume of supplies has dropped in a decade which is perhaps an indication the rate of killing is higher than their regeneration rate, but this is a business we can't stop because it is very lucrative."

Environmental activists are furious that crocodiles might soon face extinction in Nigeria, especially if their hides are simply going to become fashion accessories for the wealthy.

"The trade is unregulated, is illegal, is not recorded. Two species are almost extinct now," Mathew Dore, an environmentalist who has worked with crocodiles for more than 25 years, told AFP.

He said the Nile crocodile, whose skin carries the most value, is "very, very scarce, almost extinct" in Nigeria, and the last time he saw the rarer long-snouted variety was 20 years ago in a zoo.

"The most abundant species now is the West African dwarf crocodile most commonly found in the Niger Delta, and with all this oil pollution and poverty issues, dependence on the crocodile (market) is continuous and unregulated," he told AFP from the southern state of Edo.

It is no coincidence the hide of the West African dwarf crocodile is not so prized for leather goods.

"Ninety percent of the skins are from illegally hunted animals," said environmental activist Desmond Majekodunmi.

"The population has been absolutely decimated. Immediate action needs to be taken, otherwise we will find our crocodile population has gone below the capacity to regenerate itself."

Local crocodile stocks have become so depleted hunters are now bringing in animals from Cameroon, Chad and Ghana.

A 1985 Nigerian law supposed to protect the crocodile and the python does not stop their skins being sold at Lagos airport, right under the eyes of customs agents.

"It does not require much effort to clear the skins at the airport. All you need to do is to pay the officials off," Dauda told AFP. "The officials at the airport... sometimes visit this tannery and we give them some token even if we have no goods to export."

Local Nigerian officials blamed the federal government for the failure to enforce the law.

"The responsibility of stopping trade in the skins of endangered species such as crocodiles lies with the federal government that controls the airports and security agencies," state environment commissioner Garba Yusuf told AFP.

"If the security agencies live up to their duty of arresting and prosecuting offenders, the trade will be stopped because once it becomes impossible to export the skins the demand will drop and the tanners and traders will be out of business."

Dore said crocodile farming was virtually unheard of in Nigeria as would-be farmers looking for short-term profitability were often deterred by the gestation period.

Crocodiles do not reproduce until age five and so a farmer typically has to wait for 10 or 15 years until he can start selling animals, said Dore, who tried bred the animals himself for a decade.

The Nile crocodile was listed as "Lower Risk" on the 1996 World Conservation Union (IUCN) list of endangered species.

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) lists it as threatened with extinction in certain areas and "not threatened, but trade must be controlled" in others.


Read more!

Powering our way out of poverty

Harish Hande, BBC News 12 May 09;

As we reach the end of the first decade in the 21st Century, about one third of the world's population still has no access to electricity, says Harish Hande. In this week's Green Room, he argues that poor people should be at the centre of sustainable energy policies, not on the end of handouts.

As the world's leaders consider how to finance our battle against climate change, the financing of practical, affordable solutions for poor people in countries like my own, India, appears to be of little interest.

It is nearly 130 years since Thomas Edison gave us the electric bulb, yet more than two billion people on this planet still do not have the luxury of electricity.

Up to 50% of households in India still have no access to modern lighting. Millions of street vendors, whether in the hi-tech city of Bangalore, India, or Kampala, Uganda, still resort to kerosene or candles to sell their meagre wares.

Today, one of the greatest threats to the environment is poverty. Can we go and tell a poor woman in a rural part of a developing country not to cut wood or stop using kerosene for her lighting because it leads to global warming? Does she have a choice?

We've invented iPods and flat-screen TVs, but somehow have not invested in ways to eliminate an Iron Age technology that consumes wood inefficiently and creates harmful indoor air pollution.

Millions of poor households around the world use the classic three-stone cooker to prepare their food, while using wood as the basic fuel.

Millions of trees have to be cut to meet the cooking needs of the poor; for lighting, millions of litres of kerosene are burnt daily. Yet, in this lopsided world, we are spending millions of dollars on finding solutions for the problems created in the West while the poor in developing countries have no choice but to keep harming the environment.

Cheap and continuous

Solutions do exist. Many assume that renewable energies like solar electricity are too expensive for the poor.

True, solar panels alone may be "expensive" but if they are combined with affordable financing mechanisms for the poor, they can be rolled out widely and make clean electricity a sustainable and viable option for millions around the developing world.

The poor spend between 10-15% of their meagre income on energy services like lighting and cooking.

This is a much higher percentage than those people who are better off. For example, a typical street vendor in Bangalore pays 15 rupees ($0.32) for four hours of kerosene lighting each day.

On a monthly basis, she therefore pays $9-10 to light her street cart. Today, solar lighting can be provided to her at commercial rates for $5-6 every a month.

The big bonus is that the vendor is able to pay for it on a daily basis, not on a monthly basis. As one street vendor told me: "300 rupees a month is expensive but 10 rupees a day is very affordable."

Much attention has gone in to reducing the cost of the technology, but much less on the details of supply chains and financing.

This would make technologies like solar, bio-gas and small-hydro affordable today, not tomorrow, to the poor.

Sustainable forms of energy can also play a key role in income generation - a primary path out of poverty for the millions who do not have access to reliable grid-distributed electricity.

The poor are also victims of inefficiency - they use inefficient sewing machines, bangle making machines and power looms. This results in soaring overall costs.

The blame is placed on renewable energy technologies, not inefficiencies of the appliances.

Many of these devices are produced with the assumption that grid electricity is "infinite" so, especially in the developing world, there is little incentive to make more efficient products.

High-efficiency income-generating appliances would increase the attractiveness of renewable energy technologies - leading to higher incomes.

Solutions are simple and do-able, but require approaches that are focused on the poor.

Many of the policies, products (both financial and technology) and processes are designed with a top to bottom approach.

This can completely bypass the needs of the poor. Technology is pushed down with disastrous consequences; many solar systems used in the rural areas of India do not work well, creating a notion that renewable energies are not reliable.

Clean cooking solutions have been created but with the idea that one size fits all, without considering the different fuel sources, food choices, cooking styles, or the size of the family.

It's high time that the poor become central to energy policies and not just recipients or "project beneficiaries".

Only then will sustainable energy be their ticket out of poverty, as well as a vital way to address climate change.

Harish Hande is managing director of Selco Solar, India

Selco Solar was the 2007 winner of the Outstanding Achievement Award from the Ashden Awards for Sustainable Energy


Read more!

Cost of solar energy will match fossil fuels by 2013, claims Solarcentury

Falling production costs for solar panels and increasing nonrenewables electricity costs have brought parity closer
Adam Vaughan, guardian.co.uk 12 May 09;

Solar energy will fall in price to match the cost of conventional fossil fuel electricity far sooner than previously expected, the UK's largest solar company has claimed in a new report.

Solarcentury said British homeowners will see solar achieve "grid parity" – the point where solar electricity rivals or becomes cheaper than conventional nonrenewable electricity – by 2013. Most predictions suggest that technological innovation will not bring the price down far enough until 2020 or later.

The company suggested falling production costs for solar panels and increasing conventional electricity costs have brought parity closer. Prices for solar and grid electricity in residential homes are expected to crossover at around 17p to 18p per unit of electricity (kWh) in 2013, followed by parity for commercial solar electricity in 2018.

Last December, the renewable energy analysts New Energy Finance predicted silicon costs – a key material for much solar panel technology – would fall by 31.5% in 2009 compared with 2008 levels. Energy consultants Element Energy, under commission from the government, have also forecast solar PV costs will fall by around half between now and 2020.

Derry Newman, CEO for Solarcentury, said: "When you reach grid parity, you have a watershed moment where the perceptions of investors and consumers shift. People have been programmed to believe solar is expensive and takes a hundred years to pay back, but when parity arrives people realise it takes 8-10 years to payback, and they can then be making money out of it."

Jeremy Leggett, executive chairman of Solarcentury said, "The feed-in tariff that the government has said it will bring in from April 2010 is vital. A burst of premium-pricing for solar energy, of the kind now on offer in 18 European countries, will stimulate a very fast-growing market."

Experts said the projections were based on significant assumptions in future energy prices, which have been extremely volatile over recent years – last year saw gas and electricity prices double, but now household bills are falling again.

Ray Noble, solar PV specialist at the Renewable Energy Association, said: "The predicted grid parity by 2013 could be possible if all of the predictions, both in terms of grid electricity prices increasing and reductions in the cost of solar PV, come through. However that's a big if – any slight changes in the pricing can add further years to this date." He added that the important message is that even if grid parity slipped to 2016, the moment when solar can compete on cost is not far off.

Chris Goodall, Green party parliamentary candidate and author of Ten Technologies to Save the Planet, warned the grid parity predictions were based on unrealistic price assumptions. "This projection of residential grid parity depends crucially on continually increasing prices of conventional electricity, but I just don't see any evidence that residential electricity will cost 17-18p a kWh in 2013. The 'underlying' retail price of electricity at the moment is no more than 11p per kWh," he said.

Newman argued that China will continue to take more fossil fuel and believes peak oil will begin to bite in 2013, which will both contribute to rising prices in fossil fuel electricity.

Other parts of the world, such as Spain and California, have already achieved grid parity on the price of solar, but only for large installations rather than small scale ones for homeowners.


Read more!

Cleaner air from reduced emissions could save millions of lives, says report

Researchers predict that 100 million early deaths could be prevented by cutting global emissions by 50% by 2050
Adam Vaughan, guardian.co.uk 12 May 09;

Tackling climate change by cutting greenhouse gas emissions could save millions of lives because of the cleaner air that would result, according to a recent study.

Researchers predict that, by 2050, about 100 million premature deaths caused by respiratory health problems linked to air pollution could be avoided through measures such as low emission cars . The economic benefits of saving those lives in developing countries such as China and India could also strengthen the negotiating hand of the UK and Europe at a crucial UN climate summit in Copenhagen this December.

Johannes Bollen, one of the authors of the report for the Netherlands Environment Agency, said the 100 million early deaths could be prevented by cutting global emissions by 50% by 2050, a target consistent with those being considered internationally. "

The reports warns that if governments continue with business-as-usual energy use, then population growth, ageing demographics and increased urbanisation will cause premature deaths from pollution to increase by 30% in OECD countries, and 100% outside the OECD.

The study also has implications for which technologies are chosen to reduce CO2 and other greenhouse gases. The study points out that while carbon capture and storage technology can capture CO2, it does not usually trap other air pollutants. Last month, the energy and climate minister, Ed Miliband, put "clean coal" at the centre of UK energy policy by pledging no new coal-fired power stations would be built without at least partial CCS.

In contrast, the report said, reducing car emissions and the number of vehicles on the road would lead to both lower greenhouse gases and fewer local air pollutants from exhausts. Jim Storey, air quality policy adviser at the UK's Environment Agency, said he wanted climate policies that account for their effect on air pollution: "There are win-wins for climate change and air quality that should be pursued with all haste, such as improving energy efficiency in houses, and reducing emissions from transport. Transport remains the largest cause of air pollution in the UK, and accounts for around 20% of the UK's greenhouse gas emissions."

The report also said the economic gains of cleaner air could be attractive for developing countries during climate treaty negotiations in Copenhagen later this year. By not losing people of working age to pollution, India and China, for example, stand to gain 4-5% in GDP in 2050 as a result of cleaner air, compared with around 1% of GDP in OECD countries such as the UK. "The local air pollution benefits of climate mitigation policies provide an additional economic incentive for countries to participate in a global agreement to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions," said Bollen.

The health threat of air pollution is well known. Recent research from the American Lung Association revealed that 186 million US residents live in areas with dangerous levels of air pollution. "Despite almost 40 years since the Clean Air Act passed in 1970, six in 10 Americans still live in dirty air areas, areas where the air is unhealthful to breathe," said the ALA's Paul Billings. As well as citing dirty diesel vehicles and coal power plants as significant contributors to US air pollution, the Association's report called for a clean-up of cruise ships, container ships and tankers, which it said will be responsible for approximately 45% of US particulate emissions by 2030. Confidential data released last month from the shipping industry suggested 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars.

In the UK, a report published this month by the London Assembly Environment Committee claimed that poor air quality in London may have contributed to 3,000 premature deaths in the capital in 2005. London has the worst air quality in the UK and among the worst in Europe for small, sooty particles known as PM10s and nitrogen dioxide.

The key air pollutants that can harm human health include nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, ammonia and particulate matter and are produced by burning fossil fuels in power plants and vehicles. Children and the elderly, plus people with respiratory conditions such as asthma, are particularly at risk.


Read more!