Has the Great Barrier Reef got a future?

J.E.N. Veron, ScienceAlert 25 Mar 08;

Once I would have thought that a ridiculous question. Yet today, if we assemble all the best science we have, the answer can at best be “maybe”.

It may seem preposterous that the greatest coral reef in the world – the biggest structure made by life on Earth – could be seriously (I mean genuinely seriously) threatened by climate change.

The question itself is probably already relegated in your mind to a ‘here-we-go-again’ catch-bag of greenie diatribe about the state of our planet. This view is understandable given that even a decade ago, there were many scientists who had not yet come to grips with the full implications of climate change.

Very likely you have a feeling that dire predictions about anything almost always turn out to be exaggerations. What you really think is: OK, where there’s smoke there’s fire, so there’s probably something in this to be worried about, somewhere. But, it won’t be as bad as those doom-sayers are predicting.

When I started writing “A Reef in Time”, I knew that climate change was likely to have serious consequences for coral reefs, but even I was shocked to the core by what all the best science that existed was saying.

In a long phase of personal anguish I turned to specialists in many different fields of science to find anything that might suggest a fault in my own conclusions. No luck.

The bottom line remains: the GBR can indeed be utterly trashed in the lifetime of today’s children. That certainty is what motivates me to broadcast this message as clearly, as accurately and, yes, as loudly, as I can.

So, what are the issues? You probably know that there have been several major episodes of mass bleaching on the GBR over the past 20 years and that these have been caused by pulses (El NiƱo events) of warm surface water heated by the greenhouse effect.

The basic numbers showing the relationship between damage and temperature are there for all to see. There is no escaping the prediction that the worse bleaching year we have had to date will be an average year by 2030 and a good year by 2050.

You don’t even need a pocket calculator to conclude that the only corals left alive by then will be those hiding in refuges such as deep outer reef slopes.

What you may not know is that bleaching is only of minor concern compared to a much more insidious and devastating issue looming in the background – ocean acidification.

Put simply, the carbon dioxide we are producing is readily absorbed by water and turned into carbonic acid which is taken up by the oceans and neutralized by carbonate/bicarbonate buffers. The problem is that we are now producing carbon dioxide so rapidly that this process is actually changing the chemistry of ocean water, making it less alkaline and altering the saturation state of the buffers.

A small matter you might think, but it isn’t. Changes are already being recorded in the Southern Ocean (gases are more readily absorbed in cold water so colder oceans will show changes first), a process that will reach the equator at about the same time as the interval mentioned above: about 2030 with full effects by 2050.

Sod’s law will then apply: the coral refugees from temperature will be the most affected by acidification. Ocean chemistry is a well-understood subject and acidification is progressing in a way that is easily predicted from a few simple chemical equations.

Although much is not yet well understood about the responses of species to marginal conditions, we do know that corals and plankton cannot build normal skeletons under the acidification that is predicted; they will suffer what can aptly be described as coralline osteoporosis.

Nor is there time for them to evolve solutions. That means that they will neither build reefs nor be able to maintain them against the forces of erosion. What were once thriving coral gardens that supported the greatest biodiversity of our oceans will be red-black bacterial slime and they will stay that way.

I have already worked in such places – there’s a photo of one in my book.

There is another frightening aspect of Climate Change. It is contained in the concept of ‘commitment’, a word we will soon be hearing only too often.

In climate change speak this means the commitment of the Earth now to paths of change that will be unavoidable and unstoppable in the future. This delayed reaction is due to the inertia of the oceans, both thermal and chemical.

Put another way, the greenhouse gases we are producing now will take a couple of decades to produce the changes they are destined to make. And when they do produce those changes they will be for keeps as far as humanity is concerned.

What I must make clear is that, great though the GBR is, if climate change can destroy one reef it can destroy them all.

So let’s forget all those grandiose adjectives that are always used to describe our Great Barrier Reef. All coral reefs grow near the ocean surface and they will all be affected by changes to that surface.

As the dinosaurs discovered, size offers no protection from an environmental upheaval. We are talking about a mass extinction event.

Mass extinction events – five in total – have hit coral reefs so hard they have taken at least four million years to re-evolve. Although we know little about the first mass extinction, the next four were primarily the result of massive climatic changes, with the carbon cycle convincingly implicated in all.

What is the fast acting currency of the carbon cycle? Carbon dioxide. I can’t escape the bottom line which says we are setting conditions on Earth for the sixth great mass extinction. Coral reefs are the ocean’s canaries. They have now sounded their warning and have started leaving the same message they left in the past.

Certainly all past extinction events are associated with much higher levels of carbon dioxide than anything predicted today, but the rate of change we are experiencing now has no known precedent in all Earth history.

It is not just ‘abrupt’ (as is often described), it is geologically and evolutionarily instantaneous. That is the big picture. In our here-and-now detail of it, another decade like our last will send the Earth across the tipping-point, and our children will see the results.

Climate change is the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced. On our present tack the future looks bleak, but it is far from hopeless. We have the science and technology to stop this from happening.

What we must do now is buy enough time for this S&T to come to the rescue. We know how to cut emissions enough through individual and corporate actions alone, irrespective of intergovernmental undertakings. We just need to accept, at all levels, that the job has to be done. Then get on with it, and fast.


Read more!

End of Maoist strife spurs Nepal rhino numbers

Reuters 24 Mar 08;

KATHMANDU (Reuters) - The numbers of endangered one-horned rhinoceros in Nepal are growing, thanks to effective anti-poaching measures in forests once occupied Maoist rebels, a senior park official said on Monday.

With peace, forests guards are going back to the jungles and authorities are restoring security and watching posts that had been removed during the decade-long Maoist insurgency that ended in 2006.

Rhino-experts, armed with binoculars and cameras, combed the Chitwan National Park on elephant backs for more than two weeks and counted 408 great one-horned rhinoceroses, chief warden of the park, Megh Bahadur Pandey said.

"We have also intensified anti-poaching drives and all political parties are interested in saving the rhinoceroses now," he said, adding that an all-party committee had been formed to discourage poachers.

The park, located about 80 km (50 miles) southwest of Kathmandu, had only 372 animals in 2005, when the last census was taken, down from 544 in 2000.

"I think this increase in a small period of three years is good," Pandey said from Chitwan.

The rhino population had dwindled in Nepal in the past after poachers killed the animal for horns and other parts which fetch thousands of dollars in China due to their touted aphrodisiac qualities.

After Chitwan the only other area where the big rhinos are found is in the northeastern Indian state of Assam, which has more than 1,800.

Rhino poaching can carry a jail term of up to 15 years and around $1,540 in fines. But experts say implementation of the law is weak.

(Reporting by Gopal Sharma; Editing by Krittivas Mukherjee)

Rare One-Horned Rhino Bouncing Back in Nepal
Paroma Basu, National Geographic News 27 Mar 08;

Numbers of the rare Indian rhinoceros are nosing upward in Nepal, a nationwide government census has found.

Recently field observers counted 408 rhinos over two weeks in Royal Chitwan National Park, one of the last remaining strongholds for the endangered animals.

Preliminary numbers from the census suggest an increase from 2005, when observers reported seeing only 372 rhinos in the park.

Rhino numbers in other parts of the country have remained stable, with preliminary counts suggesting there are 31 rhinos in Royal Bardia National Park and 6 in the Royal Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve, both in western Nepal.

A healthier sex ratio as well as gradual improvements in habitat management have helped boost rhino numbers, said Laxmi Prasad Manandhar, chief conservation and education officer at Nepal's Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation.

Officials say the rhino rebound is also due to new anti-poaching measures implemented in the aftermath of the country's decade-long Maoist insurgency.

Jungle patrols had ground to a halt during Nepal's civil war, in which Maoists occupied the forests and poaching activities went on unchecked.

"Since the end of the conflict period [in 2006], we have increased the number of guard posts in Chitwan to 34," Manandhar said.

"We are similarly constructing new guard posts in Bardia and Suklaphanta. Those who are now patrolling the forests include army people, civil servants, and members of the public."

Ramping Up

The Indian rhino, also known as the great one-horned rhinoceros, once roamed through large parts of South Asia.

Its horn is reputed to have aphrodisiac properties and can be worth thousands of dollars in China's traditional-medicine market.

Decades of poaching and habitat destruction brought the species to the brink of extinction in the 1900s. Today fewer than 2,000 rhinos live in fragmented pockets of Nepal and northeastern India.

Last January wildlife officials announced that more than four dozen rhinos appeared to have gone missing in Nepal over the course of a few years, most likely due to unchecked poaching.

Royal Chitwan National Park saw its rhino numbers fall from 544 in 2000 to 372 in 2005.

A recent spate of rhino killings prompted Nepal's government and conservation authorities in February to ramp up anti-poaching measures and launch the latest census.

About 200 wildlife biologists, technicians, forest rangers, and field observers took part in the survey, which was a joint effort among Nepal's Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, WWF-Nepal, and the National Trust for Nature Conservation.

The team also included 40 elephants that ferried members through remote forest areas, said WWF-Nepal spokesperson Anil Manandhar, who is unrelated to the national parks division's Laxmi Prasad Manandhar.

The census used global positioning systems for the first time, and observers carried digital cameras to photograph every rhino seen, WWF's Manandhar said.

Full results of the census are expected in the next two weeks.

"The final numbers will give us a clearer picture as to whether poaching is reducing in other parts of the country as well, and not just in Chitwan," he said.


Read more!

Eyes on the Planet: A photo competition


The first step to improved the health of the Earth is to open our eyes.

An international photo competition, 1 Mar - 30 Sep 06

The contest aims at documenting the huge changes by which the Earth is being affected and making young people aware of the use of photograpy to become supporters of concrete messages to contribute to preservation of the planet, by offering them concrete opportunities of visibility and professional growth.

Categories include people, environment, food and climate


Full details on the Eyes on the Planet website.

Thanks to Kevin Lam for the alert.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 24 Mar 08


Over-fishing?
issues considered over a typical catch by our fishermen on the reddotbeachbum blog

West Coast fishing - 7 bags full and scubatanks even
more fishing at a 'deeper' level on the reddotbeachbum blog

West Coast Park beach
a narrow strip of natural shore on the reddotbeachbum blog

Views of our wild places
Dr Stan shares his experiences at Ubin - "Waterworld" and Mandai night adventures and Semakau and Ecology and Planning and Bollywood and MacRitchie on his singapore blog

Singapore's natural past: Ubin
shared by Carly from Duke University on her travels blog

Who visits our wild places?
observations on the budak blog

Sunbird showdown
a confrontation between two male sunbirds on the bird ecology blog


Read more!

A taste of drought in Singapore

Straits Times 24 Mar 08;

As the world celebrates Water Day, Dunstan Lee wonders why it's so tough to get youth interested in water issues

SINGAPORE has enough water for its population now, so it is a challenge convincing young people their supply might be threatened.

But reality bites. Global warming, water pollution and the booming world population are now collectively putting strains on our water sources. We are the generation which will inherit this earth and its problems.

Yet I, for one, can be upfront: I've never lived through a drought or water rationing.

The only times I had to be careful with my water was during my army field camps when supplies had to last several days.

To truly get this generation - the 'clickerati' and the technology-savvy - involved, we can't just tell the youth, we have to sell the idea, too.

This month, we celebrated World Water Day. But will it be enough to just head down to a reservoir and think about how we can ensure good clean water?

Issues such as water pollution and shortages are pressing, but it's another thing to engage the youth about them.

Having grown up without experiencing water problems, we have a tough time imagining what it would be to go without. After all, we have always had access to clean, treated water, straight from the tap.

Besides, Singapore currently has enough water for its population, so convincing young people not to take water sources for granted is a challenge.

Perhaps a more effective approach would be to drive home the point with an experience - a taste of drought.

Teach water conservation through rationing exercises across all schools in collaboration with, say, Total Defence Day or National Day. Such an experience is likely to help the youth appreciate its importance.

Or how about playing citizen journalists on online forums, with the youth contributing pictures of polluted canals and drains to help nab guilty polluters?

Already, on World Water Day on Saturday, four Stomp contributors were recognised as Friends of Water by the national water agency PUB for giving tip-offs on the pollution of water sources.

In the last couple of years, more water activities have been introduced at reservoirs.

But while having fun, can we do more to help young people remember that they can do so only in clean water?

Just imagine the opposite - paddling in a foul-smelling river choked with litter, animal carcasses and other unsavoury stuff.

The writer, 24, is a final-year undergraduate at the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University


Read more!

Singapore and the Carbon Trade

Carbon trade: To invest or not to invest?
Business Times 24 Mar 08;

It's unclear what form carbon markets will take after Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012, but many are convinced that carbon will have a price even after that, writes MATTHEW PHAN

THE carbon markets, whether you choose to praise or vilify them, have grown over the last two years, and today form a critical part of the Kyoto Protocol's mechanisms.

According to the United Nations, abatement projects in the developing world have prevented more than 100 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from entering the atmosphere.

And at least another 2.4 billion tonnes worth are expected to be avoided by 2012, from the nearly 2,900 projects registered with the UN so far.

But with Kyoto expiring after 2012, it is unclear what form the markets will take.

While most industry players believe carbon trading will continue until the rules are officially fixed, investors will hold back from financing projects.

'The question is, from an external financier's point of view, what would the risk coefficient of the project be?' says Mark Leslie, vice-president for South-east and East Asia at AES Agriverde, a project developer.

Since firms cannot guarantee that credits will have value after 2012, an investor may only partially fund a project. And as projects take time to register and construct, as the clock ticks away, they have a shorter and shorter period in which to earn back the money. If you believe that CERs (certified emissions reductions) will have no value after 2012, then a significant percentage of a project's value disappears with each passing month, says Mr Leslie.

Beyond the existential question are other pressing issues. The first of these is the balance in global demand and supply of carbon credits.

If countries do not commit to cutting emissions, demand for carbon credits will evaporate and the carbon price will collapse. Without a carbon price, it is not only project developers that will lose money - the financial incentive for companies to slash emissions will disappear and emissions will soar.

That is why industry players and environmentalists alike cheered Australia's promise to abide by Kyoto, and will intensely watch negotiations between the United States and China - the world's two largest emitters - over the next two years.

At the Carbon Asia Forum in Singapore last November, analyst Guy Turner of New Carbon Finance said that if the supply of CERs from Latin America and Asia accelerates, demand from Europe, Japan and Canada may prove insufficient. 'North American demand will then be essential,' he said.

Other factors could affect demand. One of them is how far developed nations will allow the use of CERs to offset their emissions.

If all the CERs can be used, then even without the US there will be a large market, says Mr Leslie.

At EcoSecurities, the world's largest buyer of credits, co-founder Marc Stuart expects no oversupply. Most of the low-hanging fruit - like large-scale, low capital projects to cut intensely pollutive HFCs (hydro-fluorocarbons) in China - are done, and the next wave of projects will be smaller and more complex, he said.

Projects in energy efficiency or renewables have multiple revenue streams and 'all the complexities of energy projects', said Mr Stuart. They take more time, involve performance issues, and require developers to form long-term relationships with technology vendors in order 'to advance the low-carbon infrastructure'.

Leaving aside demand and supply, another pressing issue is how to improve the current system.

Only 49 countries have registered carbon projects so far, with Brazil, China and India supplying about three-fifths of all credits. Contribution from Africa is minimal. Kyoto critics want to extend the geographical reach of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and allow different kinds of projects, so more poor countries can benefit.

One way to do this is to validate 'programatic' projects. This approach speeds up the approval of similar small-scale projects and could help finance things like the widespread use of energy efficient lightbulbs in rural villages. Approving each light bulb change one-by-one - as the current process requires - would simply make no sense.

But only one 'programatic' method has so far been given the nod by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change's (UNFCCC) executive board. Narrow in scope, it cannot apply to many asset types. 'We need more tools to make it work. Right now, we've got one,' said EcoSecurities' Mr Stuart.

One problem developers face is that the exec board is 'incredibly focused on being exact, rather than conservative', he said.

The market must be bigger if it is to address the underlying environmental issue. So while the board is appropriately cautious, it needs to balance efficiency against precision.

'Everybody is willing to take an appropriate discount on tonnes issued by the UN, if there is some uncertainty about exact performance', if the result is a more efficient and predictable process, he said.

Meanwhile, market uncertainty, poor liquidity and a worsening economic climate could lead to industry consolidation in coming years.

While some project developers are large and diversified, or part of a strong parent, like a bank or power generator, many are small firms with limited balance sheets.

At last November's forum, Laurent Segalen, head of the carbon group at Lehman Brothers, said only 40 per cent of firms which deal in primary CERs are investment grade.

In a presentation, titled 'Carbon Credit Crunch?', he said many independent carbon consultants decided to go beyond advisory services and take on the risk of owning projects.

In a sample of six firms, the value of their CER portfolios was between 14 and an incredible 168 times the value of shareholders' equity; in one case, the shareholders' equity was negative, according to Mr Segalen. Choose your counter-party carefully, he warned.

For the strong and patient, payoffs will be high. Political moves, scientific conviction and growing public awareness of global warming have convinced many that carbon will have a price beyond 2012. As Mr Leslie said, 'It depends on the company's cash flows, but if a company can afford to wait to sell the CERs, there will be a time in the future when CERs will see higher values.'


Read more!

What it takes for Singapore to be a carbon hub

Business Times 24 Mar 08;

SINGAPORE has made clear its ambition to be a regional carbon hub. What does this entail?

According to the Economic Development Board (EDB), the 'carbon services ecosystem' includes a variety of different firms.

It involves not just project developers, verification and monitoring firms, or carbon consultants - who help take companies through the process of generating carbon credits.

Not is it just the hedge funds, banks or other intermediaries who invest in projects or buy and hold credits, betting that prices will rise.

It also includes think-tanks and international organisations, technology providers like renewable energy or waste management firms, and - perhaps the most visible of them all - carbon traders and exchanges.

Goh Chee Kiong, head of the Environment and Clean Energy unit at the EDB's New Business Group, says that Singapore's infrastructure, skilled manpower and reputation as a financial centre will be applied to this sector. The country's strong push into energy - through successful courtship of key names in the solar, wind and biofuel industries - means that a cluster of clean-tech companies will be ready to service projects in the region, including South-east Asia, China and India, he says.

This is timely. While it is questionable whether Singapore can establish a carbon trading centre in the next few years, industry players say that the starting point is to attract as many diverse members of a carbon community as it can.

Technology providers, especially, are critical. Most projects require technical solutions, whether it is more efficient power generation or ways to capture and dispose of methane and other gases.

Furthermore, many early carbon projects were in lucrative sectors, like the removal of hydro-fluorocarbons (HFCs) - highly pollutive industrial gases - but these are now gone. According to Erik Chan of EcoSecurities, as the low-hanging fruit is plucked, the second wave of projects will be more complicated and require more technology content.

Singapore could also host firms that monitor or manage forests, if and when opportunities to earn carbon credits via reforestation emerge.

As for financiers, Singapore is already home to several of the banks that lead in carbon trading and brokerage - such as Barclays, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Fortis, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Mitsubishi UFJ.

Still, establishing a hub for carbon trading is a different proposition. 'I don't see why there is any compelling reason for a carbon hub in an area with no demand,' says Marc Stuart, co-founder and director of new business development at EcoSecurities.

Since most of the end-buyers of carbon are in Europe, trading platforms in Asia would be superfluous, he says.

Singapore developed as an oil trading hub thanks to its massive amount of storage capacity as a bunkering port, but carbon credits are different - there is no underlying physical commodity. If anything, project-based credits are substitutes for EUAs (European allowances), which are traded entirely in Europe. Buyers who do come to Asia can do better by sourcing their credits through brokers, or by approaching sellers directly.

This could change if a strong voluntary market emerges in Asia - such as it has in Japan - or if Asian countries commit to reducing emissions.

Meanwhile, an independent carbon group in Singapore set up the Asia Carbon Exchange, an online platform where buyers meet sellers via an open auction of projects. Volumes are paltry so far, at just 3.5 million credits from over 20 online transactions, about 28 million euros (S$60.5 million) worth, but the group wants to ally with an established exchange to grow.

Generally, an exchange needs to provide smooth and transparent pricing. Individual buyers need to know who the seller is and what the counter party risk is. An exchange needs facilities to settle payments across borders. And it needs good liquidity - if there is high liquidity today but it dries up tomorrow, prices could collapse.

Carbon credits: How they help reduce GHG

Business Times 24 Mar 08;

What are carbon credits?

Each carbon credit allows the holder to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Carbon credits have no physical underlying product - unlike derivative contracts like oil or grain futures, which are written on the actual commodities.

Rather, credits are created in two ways. The first type of credits are allowances, which are handed out to developed countries and effectively set a quota on their pollution.

The second type are project-based. They are created when an entity in a developing country completes a project that permanently reduces its greenhouse gas emissions. The project is verified by the UN, which issues credits to the entity. The entity can then sell the credits to developed country buyers.

The market exists because of the Kyoto Protocol, under which some developed countries, mainly in Europe and North America, agreed to cut their GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions by an average of 5 per cent from 1990 levels by 2012.

Who buys carbon credits?

End demand comes from two sources. The first and largest consists of compliance buyers, located mainly in Europe, such as power generators. They must buy credits to offset their emissions, if they are exceeding their allowances.

The second, far smaller, source comes from voluntary buyers - both companies and individuals - from the US, Japan, Australia or elsewhere, who want to help fight global warming (or give the impression they are doing so).

Some 23.7 million tonnes worth of voluntary credits were bought in 2006, compared to nearly 1.64 billion tonnes worth of UN-issued credits.

Where do credits come from?

The largest source is the European Union Allowances (EUAs), which are handed out to European countries based on the pollution quotas each state is allowed. 1.13 billion tonnes, or US$24.6 billion worth, of EUAs were traded in 2006.

The second source are project-based, such as under the Joint Implementation (JI) programme or the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). About 500 million tonnes of project-based credits, worth US$5.5 billion, were traded in 2006.

How are credits traded?

Trading takes place on exchanges, like the European Climate Exchange, or the Chicago Climate Exchange.

They are also traded through hedge funds, banks, or other intemediaries, which aggregate credits from projects all over the world, structure them into portfolios, then sell them on to end-buyers.

Many funds also invest directly in projects that cut emissions, with plans to hold or sell the generated credits.

Further, buyers can purchase directly from sellers, though this may again be arranged through a broker, or an online auction platform, like Singapore's own Asia Carbon Exchange.

How does carbon trading help the environment?

The carbon markets are essential to setting a price for carbon. This is important because companies then recognise there is a monetary benefit from reducing their pollution, because they either need to purchase fewer credits, or can sell off excess credits.

The market exists because of the commitments from countries to cut emissions and the political will to follow through with these promises. While the market enables countries to meet commitments by buying credits from others, any efforts to fight climate change must begin with commitments from governments, companies and individuals.

Some say that a carbon tax would be more efficient to administer, and less vulnerable to lobbying by industry groups than a cap-and-trade system. Industry players counter that a trading system allows the free market to discover the price for emissions.


Read more!

Giant Waves Break Up Caribbean Coral

Associated Press 24 mar 08;

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — Unusually large waves churned by an Atlantic storm system have littered the beaches of Barbados with broken coral in what could be a sign of damage to reefs across the region, a scientist said Sunday.

The amount of rubble on the island's west coast suggests the coral took a heavy pounding, said Leo Brewster, director of Barbados' Coastal Zone Management Unit, who was organizing dives later this week to survey the damage.

"We think it's going to be pretty extensive," Brewster said. "I think we're going to see it across the Caribbean."

The waves, reaching as high as an estimated 30 feet, lashed coastlines from Guyana to the Dominican Republic last week as a large low-pressure system idled off the northeastern United States.

At their peak on Thursday morning, a buoy north of the U.S. Virgin Islands recorded swells of 15 feet — the highest since 1991, said Shawn Rossi, a meteorologist with the U.S. National Weather Service in San Juan. Several countries reported flooding in coastal areas.

In Barbados, the white coral washed up in chunks as heavy as seven pounds, generally healthy but with their polyps rubbed away by the rough surf, Brewster said.

Reef-building coral provide a habitat for thousands of marine creatures but have been dying off across the Caribbean due to coastal pollution, overfishing and disease blamed on rising sea temperatures.


Read more!

Thai police seize endangered species in market raid

Yahoo News 23 Mar 08;

Thai wildlife police have arrested two vendors and seized more than 200 rare animals including endangered tortoises during a raid at Bangkok's popular weekend market, police said Sunday.

The sting operation on Saturday in the pet section of the sprawling Chatuchak Market turned up more than two million baht (64,000 dollars) worth of rare otters, slow lorises, birds and 21 endangered Madagascar tortoises.

"Police are taking the suppression of endangered species smuggling very seriously," said Police Colonel Thanayos Kengkasikit of Thailand's environmental crime division.

He told AFP that police arrested one woman and one man and charged them with smuggling endangered species. The pair denied the charges and were each released on 40,000-baht bail, he added.

The Madagascar tortoise -- or geochelone yniphora -- is on the World Conservation Union's red list of endangered species.

A wildlife charity said in a statement that the undercover raid of 10 shops was the largest here this year, but warned that the trade at Chatuchak Market -- a popular tourist draw -- was just one part of an international operation.

"We hope to see police agencies in other countries follow this example and join up to catch cross border wildlife criminals," said Steven Galster of the Wildlife Alliance.

Thailand, with its highly developed infrastructure and location, has become a transportation centre for the illicit animal trade in Southeast Asia, animal rights groups say.


Read more!

Brazil military will combat dengue outbreak in Rio

Yahoo News 23 Mar 08;

Brazil's military will help fight an outbreak of dengue fever in Rio de Janeiro, the defense ministry said at the weekend, after the disease killed 49 people and made more than 30,000 ill this year.

Public hospitals in the northern and western districts of the city were overwhelmed by the number of patients seeking treatment at the weekend. Many complained about long delays.

The defense ministry said Army, Air Force and Navy commanders would propose an action plan to Defense Minister Nelson Jobim as early as Monday on how to combat the disease in the famous beach and port city.

Jobim said on Friday the armed forces may set up field hospitals in the city.

Health officials confirmed on Sunday that a 12-year-old boy died of dengue, bringing the death toll to 49 people this year, according to the Globo Online news agency.

More than 30,000 people have fallen ill with the disease this year, state health officials said on Thursday.

Rio de Janeiro Health Secretary described the outbreak as an epidemic, according to the Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper.

Dengue is a viral disease spread by the Aedes mosquito and there is no vaccine or drug to treat it.

(Reporting by Raymond Colitt; Editing by John O'Callaghan)


Read more!

'Green' cars boost Thai auto industry

Jutarat Tongpiam, Yahoo News 23 Mar 08;

Incentives from the Thai government to encourage automakers to produce fuel-efficient "eco-cars" have yielded a raft of major investments and started to change how Thais drive, experts say.

Tax breaks for automakers and car buyers were unveiled last year, as the government worried that Thailand's position as the world's biggest maker of light pickups might not be enough to guarantee the future of its auto industry.

The kingdom churns out 900,000 one-tonne trucks every year -- about three-fourths of global output.

But amid soaring oil prices and concerns about greenhouse gas emissions, the government expressed concern that the global market for gas-guzzling trucks could weaken as consumers turn to more fuel-efficient cars.

So last year Thailand announced incentives to encourage automakers to set up local production bases for "eco-cars" that meet the most stringent European emission standards and run on fuel with a 20 percent ethanol component.

Sales taxes on smaller cars were also slashed from January 1, which sent sales booming in the first two months of the year.

"First-time car owners, and especially motorcyclists who want to become car owners, are cost-conscious consumers," said Surapong Paisitpatnapong, spokesman for the Federation of Thai Industries' automotive club.

"Investments in eco-car production will help grow this new segment of the country's domestic auto market while increasing exports," he said.

Seven automakers -- including Toyota, Volkswagon, and India's Tata -- have proposed eco-car projects to Thailand's Board of Investment. Four have already been approved, according to Surapong.

Among the deals, Honda plans to invest 6.7 billion baht (213 million dollars) to assemble eco-cars while manufacturing engines and parts here.

The new plant will produce 120,000 units a year, with about half destined for other Asian and European markets.

Suzuki says it will spend 9.5 billion baht to build a new factory in central Thailand that will employ 1,200 people and produce 138,000 units a year. About 80 percent of the output will be for export.

Nissan has announced a 5.55 billion baht investment to produce 120,000 units a year, also mainly for export.

Under the scheme, the companies will not have to pay corporate income taxes on their investments for eight years, and duties on imported machinery will be waived.

Most of the proposals are designed to produce cars for export, and shipments of passenger cars from Thailand already jumped more than 43 percent in the first two months compared to the same period last year.

But the government is also boosting domestic demand for fuel-efficient vehicles by slashing excise taxes to 17 percent, compared to the previous rates of 30 to 50 percent.

That has already sent sales of small cars soaring in a country that has long favoured roomier trucks and SUVs.

Passenger car sales jumped nearly 33 percent in January and 45 percent in February, against the same months last year, according to Toyota Motor Thailand, the industry's statistics compiler.

"Eco-cars are going to be hot in Thailand's auto market. The lower prices for these minicars, along with high oil prices, will drive up the demand," said Nongnapat Wilepana, a Nissan dealer in Bangkok.

Analysts say the new investments by automakers will also give the broader economy a boost by creating new jobs.

"There will be more jobs for local people not only at auto assembly plants for eco-cars but also at auto part plants" supplying the new factories, said Pichai Lertsupongkit, senior vice president at Thanachart Securities.

Thailand's main worry is that its auto industry depends entirely on foreign companies, since the kingdom has no national automaker, Surapong said.

That means the country will have to keep wooing automakers with attractive offers in the future to deter them from looking for better deals for their factories in other countries, he warned.


Read more!

Biofuel boom threatens food supplies: Nestle

Yahoo News 23 Mar 08;

Growing use of crops such as wheat and corn to make biofuels is putting world food supplies in peril, the head of Nestle, the world's biggest food and beverage company, warned Sunday.

"If as predicted we look to use biofuels to satisfy 20 percent of the growing demand for oil products, there will be nothing left to eat," chairman and chief executive Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said.

"To grant enormous subsidies for biofuel production is morally unacceptable and irresponsible," he told the Swiss newspaper NZZ am Sonntag.

While the competition is driving up the price of maize, soya and wheat, land for cultivation is becoming rare and water sources are also under threat, Brabeck said.

His remarks echoed concerns raised by the United Nations' independent expert on the right to food, Jean Ziegler.

Speaking at the UN General Assembly last year, Ziegler called for a five-year moratorium on all initiatives to develop biofuels in order to avert what he said might be "horrible" food shortages.

Diplomats from countries pursuing such fuels, such as Brazil and Colombia, disagreed with his forecast.


Read more!

Curbing soot could blunt global warming: study

Yahoo News 23 Mar 08;

Sharply reducing the amount of black carbon -- commonly known as soot -- in the atmosphere could help slow global warming and buy precious time in the long-term fight against climate change, according to a study released Sunday.

Curbing soot emissions could also be a life saver, said the study, published Sunday in the British journal Nature.

Each year, more than 400,000 deaths among women and children in India alone, and 1.6 million worldwide, are attributed to smoke inhalation during indoor cooking using biofuels such as wood or dung, one of the primary sources of black carbon, according to the World Health Organisation.

Reviewing dozens of recent scientific studies, two researchers in the United States calculated that black carbon is the second largest contributor to global warming after carbon dioxide, a byproduct of burning fossil fuels.

In addition, the eight million metric tonnes of soot released into the atmosphere every year have created a number of "hot spots" around the world, contributing significantly to rising temperatures.

The plains of south Asia along the Ganges River and continental east Asia are both such hotspots, in part because up to 35 percent of global black carbon output comes from China and India.

Emissions in China alone doubled between 2000 and 2006, according to the study, published in 2006.

Fine black soot settling on snow and ice -- and thus trapping more of the Sun's radiative force -- have also accelerated the melting of glaciers in the Himalayas and ice cover in the Arctic, two regions that have been hit especially hard by climate change in recent decades.

"A major focus on decreasing black carbon emissions offers an opportunity to mitigate the effects of global warming trends in the short term," the authors conclude.

While the presence of black carbon, sometimes in the form of great plumes several kilometres high called atmospheric brown clouds, has been known to scientists for some time, their impact on warming has been hard to assess.

Direct measurement requires multiple aircraft flying over the same domain at different altitudes for an extensive period at the same time.

Significantly cutting back on black carbon emissions is not only possible, but would yield rapid benefits, say the authors, Veerabhadran Ramanathan of the Scripps Institute in San Diego, California, and Greg Carmichael of the University of Iowa.

Forty percent of soot comes from the same sources as greenhouses gases, notably the burning of coal and oil, and will only be reduced as quickly or slowly as economies become less carbon intensive.

But the remaining 60 percent of black carbon in the atmosphere comes from the more easily altered practices of burning biofuels and forests, the authors say.

Also, cutting back soot output would have an almost immediate effect.

Unlike carbon dioxide, which lingers in the atmosphere for 100 years after it is released, black carbon has an atmospheric life cycle of approximately one week.

"Providing alternative energy-efficient and smoke-free cookers, and introducing transferring technology for reducing soot emissions from coal combustion in small industries could have major impacts" on reducing soot's role in global warming, they conclude.

Such measures would result in a 70-80 percent reduction in heating caused by black carbon in south Asia, and a 20-40 percent cut in China, according to the study.

The authors caution, however, that soot reduction can only help delay unprecedented climate change, which is due primarily to CO2 emissions.


Read more!