Best of our wild blogs: 3 Nov 09


Barcode information is now on EOL species pages
from EOL News

The oceans' bounty
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Leaf hopper
from The annotated budak

Can He Stick?
from Manta Blog

Lower Peirce - by Richard
from Singapore Nature

Spotted Dove nesting
from Bird Ecology Study Group

JP Ross Fly Rods Came To Town
from Fish, Respect And Protect

Penjuru Road canal polluted with oil and other liquids
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Soil investigation off Tanah Merah, Nov-Dec 09
from wild shores of singapore

Petrochemical complex opposite Pulau Hantu nears completion
from wild shores of singapore


Read more!

Singapore is commited to the ongoing international efforts to tackle climate change

Comments by Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, Dr Yaacob Ibrahim
SG Press Centre 30 Oct 09;

Responding to media enquiries while in Barcelona, before attending the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Climate Change, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Dr Yaacob Ibrahim said:

"The Clean and Green Singapore 2010 being launched today by our Prime Minister signifies Singapore's continuing commitment since the 1960s to protect cherish and keep our environment clean. We kept the environment at the forefront of our development considerations long before sustainable development became an international concern. This enabled us to develop our economy without sacrificing clean air, clean water, clean land and greenery.

Building on our efforts over the past 40 years, the Sustainable Singapore Blueprint released in April will help Singapore chart directions towards achieving the twin goals of growing the economy and protecting the environment. It also represents our response to the emerging challenges of population growth, resource scarcity and climate change.

Singapore is committed to the ongoing international efforts to tackle climate change. To address climate change effectively, a concerted effort by all countries is needed. And to move the process forward, we need a fair global solution that takes into account differences in national circumstances. Singapore is not an Annex I country, and is not obliged to take on economy-wide targets on reducing emissions like Annex I countries. Notwithstanding this, we are prepared to do what is possible within our means, and energy efficiency has been recognised as a key strategy for us.

If a global agreement is reached, we are prepared to do our fair share. Every measure entails costs. To afford to continue to take mitigation measures, we need to grow. We must therefore balance concern over the environment with economic growth, and how we find a balance will be a continuous process.”




PRESS SECRETARY TO THE MINISTER
MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND WATER RESOURCES

30 OCTOBER 2009


Read more!

Maldives Says Carbon Neutral Goal Ahead Of Schedule

Maryam Omidi, PlanetArk 3 Nov 09;

The Maldives could achieve its aim of becoming carbon neutral well before its 2020 target, the Indian Ocean island nation's president said Monday.

To meet the goal of making the archipelago totally free of carbon emissions, the Maldives government has been encouraging investments in power generation through wind, solar and other renewable energy sources to replace diesel.

Monday, the government inaugurated a $200 million wind farm project it said would generate 40 percent of the Maldives total energy demand of 542,000 MWh within the next 20 months.

The project is expected to reduce carbon emissions by a fifth.

"Our target is to become carbon neutral in 10 years, but with the manner things are proceeding now, my feeling is that we will be able to achieve these goals much, much earlier," Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed said after the ceremony.

The island nation off the tip of India, best-known for luxury tropical hideaways and unspoiled beaches, is among the most threatened by rising seas. The U.N. has predicted that a rise in sea levels of up to 58 cm could submerge many of its 1,192 islands by 2100.

On October 17, Nasheed and his cabinet held the world's first underwater cabinet meeting, in a symbolic cry for help.
(Editing by Alex Richardson)


Read more!

Cool heads needed to negotiate climate deal

Emissions have been growing, rising 12.5% between 1990 and 2007, according to the UN
G. Panicker, Business Times 3 Nov 09;

THE climate talks may go the way the Doha round on global trade is going.

Poor political will has left the global trade talks in limbo. The benefits from a free flow of goods and services are known and the Doha round can potentially lift global GDP by about US$500 billion. Yet the agreement is a good three years behind schedule.

Similar political dithering seems to paralyse the even more ambitious global attempt to regulate greenhouse gases to save our planet from catastrophe. Current negotiating positions hardly offer hope for a quick conclusion.

Unlike trade, complex climate science impact studies are based on computer models and are not exact, leaving room for some scepticism.

Yet evidence of change piles up, with the latest noting a dramatic shift in the ecosystem under the North Sea. Greenhouse gas reductions have also to contend with the current entrenched high-carbon regime.

So what should have been the end of the negotiating process next month after two years of hectic activity looks like it's spilling over into next year.

The developing world is pitted against the developed nations. Led by the United States, rich nations have a historical responsibility to avert a potential crisis. But the two camps are far apart over on crucial aspects of resolution.

Last month, China and India cut a climate deal between themselves - a strategy some people see as an alternative for poor nations to the treaty. China, emitting 6.8 billion tonnes, and India, 1.4 billion tonnes, jointly account for a quarter of 33 giga tonnes of global emissions. Energy conservation, efficiency, renewable energy and forest management fall under the scope of their memorandum of understanding.

The two oppose any absolute goals for their own emissions cuts and refuse to provide numbers for the long-term. China's President Hu Jintao recently promised to cut carbon intensity in every unit of economic output, again with no numbers.

The developing world is seeking reductions of 40 per cent from rich nations below their 1990 levels by 2020. Norway alone has promised to aim that high. Other rich countries offer a range - between 20 per cent and 30 per cent, leaving a huge gap on targets. Poor nations also ask for easier access to technology and a relaxation of the intellectual property rights regime in this regard. On funding for adaptation and mitigation, they have sought 0.5 per cent to one per cent of rich nations' GDP. Finance is perhaps the most critical aspect of the negotiations.

The United Nations Environmental Programme quotes analysts to say that investments of US$500 billion a year will be needed to help poor nations adapt to climate change and to power low carbon growth. The European Union has concluded that adaptation needs will rise to 100 billion euros (S$206.7 billion) by 2020.

While committing to pay half of that amount, EU has refused to detail how much each member will have to chip in. Europeans are waiting to see what other rich countries and advanced developing nations promise before they show their cards.

US legislation on this issue is stuck in Congress, forestalling the Obama administration from making firm commitments on targets or funding. A lack of US leadership simply escalates uncertainty over the outcome at Copenhagen.

But all efforts to make the rich countries budge will come to naught if the big developing countries are unwilling to yield some ground. The European Union is seeking emission cuts of 15-30 per cent from them in the future. Pressure could also mount from the US Senate for more concessions when it takes up the bill.

Progress on all central issues, including the institutional framework needed for disbursing money, has been scanty. Further, the Bangkok preparatory meeting last month raised doubts about the future of Kyoto Protocol, from which the US has opted out and developing nations are exempt.

Developing countries see the Kyoto Protocol, which has fixed obligations for the top polluters, and want the commitments extended to developing countries after 2012. There is move to make national schedules form the basis for a global agreement but national action will be internationally verifiable. Developing countries resist any attempt to tamper with Kyoto.

It is disappointing that we have no acceptable framework yet. Negotiators must get on the same page but not before they cut through the maze of over 180 pages of proposals. Time is short.

Meanwhile, emissions have been growing, rising 12.5 per cent between 1990 and 2007, according to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The US emissions have gone up 20 per cent and Turkey's by 118 per cent. Even Denmark, the host of the December summit, clocked a one per cent increase.

Balancing emissions and global economic growth is not going to be smooth or easy. The window for action is narrowing. Earlier this decade, carbon concentrations of 550 parts per million (PPM) in the atmosphere were regarded a level safe. Then the ceiling was lowered to 450 ppm, a goal which has the official seal of approval in a bid to limit temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius from the 19th century. But activists are already campaigning for support to the 350 ppm level.

For a climate deal, the leaders must bridge the gap between rhetoric and proposed action. We will watch a summit of US and Chinese presidents in Beijing and a meeting of the G-20 leaders this month on how the standoff is going to be resolved.

Developing countries must press industrialised countries for ambitious targets. But they must make clear how much they will alter their own upward emissions trajectories. On finance, big developing countries need to be realistic. For instance, funding help to China - even though some say Beijing is doing more than it gets credit for - is being hotly contested in Western opinion polls and by the poor nations of Europe.

The last of the preparatory session is now under way at Barcelona. Much political capital must be invested if it is to provide clarity on issues and targets before the final session next month. We need cool heads, not hot air, to avoid Copenhagen 2.0.

The writer is with BT's foreign desk


Read more!

Q+A: How can economic growth be decoupled from carbon emissions?

Gillian Murdoch, Reuters 2 Nov 09;

(Reuters) - Growing economies without emitting carbon is the biggest dilemma of our times, sustainable development guru Tim Jackson argues in "Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet," published on Monday.

The economics commissioner for the UK government's Sustainable Development Commission, Jackson advises that sustainability won't be achieved through relentless material consumption growth. Instead, a rewriting of the economic rule book is needed to meet the linked challenges of climate change, ecological degradation and resource scarcity.

Following are some questions Jackson answered about his blueprint for low-carbon growth in an email interview.

CAN ECONOMIC GROWTH BE DECOUPLED FROM CARBON EMISSIONS?

A few countries have made more progress in reducing carbon emissions than others, not just through accidents of fuel history, like the UK's dash for gas, but also through developing renewable energy, like Denmark's wind industry.

However, in both cases, growth still increases carbon emissions. We won't get a true decoupling until we've transformed our economies into real renewable energy economies. Achieving that requires a massive investment. If we fail to make that investment, sooner or later we'll run our economies off an ecological cliff.

WHAT ARE THE MAIN RESOURCE DEPLETION THREATS WE'RE FACING?

Those associated with oil. Some analysts believe the peak in extractable oil reserves has already been passed... Even the International Energy Agency foresees real shortages by 2020.

The carbon crunch could come over the same sort of timescale if the worst predictions of climate science turn out to be true.

At the very least, we seem to be on track for a 6 degrees (Celsius) warming by the end of this century. Human life in such a world would be considerably harsher than it is today.

AND TRADE-RELATED CARBON EMISSIONS ARE A MAJOR "HIDDEN COST?"

(They are) the biggest emissions source left unaccounted for in national accounts. Aviation and maritime 'bunker emissions' are also considerable. Taken together they already wipe out the apparent gains in carbon reduction achieved in the UK since 1990.

A fifth to a quarter of China's emissions may be associated with goods destined for consumption in developed nations.

The most likely policy intervention to offset the impact of traded carbon emissions is either a global financing mechanisms funded by the developed nations to reduce carbon emissions in the industrialising nations, or some sort of border tax or tariff on high carbon goods with the proceeds recycled back to the producing country to reduce carbon intensities.

SOLUTIONS INVOLVE SCRAPPING GDP AND GREENING INVESTMENT?

The most important thing is to establish an international consensus about a new national accounting framework -- similar to the postwar consensus established around the GDP. (For example) three headline indicators measuring 1. GDP adjusted for some of its most obvious economic deficiencies, 2. carbon footprints, and 3. some measure of social wellbeing.

The new ecological macroeconomics would focus on 'ecological' investment: targeting capital at resource efficiency, low-carbon technologies, demand management and sustainable infrastructures (transport systems for instance).

It's extremely unlikely that such investments will happen without significant changes to capital markets. There is a need for a radical rethink of both financial and commodity markets, to re-localise some elements of financial markets to encourage local investment in community infrastructure.

HOW OPTIMISTIC ARE YOU THAT ECOLOGICAL REALISM WILL PREVAIL?

I am optimistic. It's an optimism based in two things. Firstly, pragmatism. Optimism is a more pragmatic position to take than defeatism or pessimism, which would have us accept the status quo and abandon the search for solutions.

Secondly, realism. My experience delving into the supposed 'impossibility theorems' around economic structure, consumer logic and governance suggests that most of the road-blocks are socially constructed. Alternatives abound.

Source: Reuters

(Download Prosperity Without Growth from the Sustainable Development Commission website here)

(Editing by David Fogarty)


Read more!

Kudos to Botak Jones for eco-friendly initiative

Straits Times Forum 3 Nov 09;

I WOULD like to praise the Botak Jones chain of food outlets for its initiative to save wild fish stocks by using fish from sustainable fisheries in its dishes.

As many may not be aware of the current situation of fish stocks globally, the abundance of fish is declining, due to overfishing, and many fish species have become endangered or vulnerable to extinction. One example is the blue-fin tuna. Declining fish stocks will also mean we cannot consume fish in the near future as the human population grows further.

Botak Jones' latest dish, char-grilled mahi mahi (dolphin fish), caught my attention during my visit last Thursday night. Its promotional menu for mahi mahi stated that this fish comes from a sustainable fishery. Curious, I approached the staff to ask the source of other fish on the menu, such as fish & chips and Alaskan pollock.

I was impressed with their replies. They understood what I was asking when I mentioned 'sustainable fishery' and could tell me the types and sources of fish species they used and how the fish were caught.

I must say, Botak Jones is one of the few eateries that is aware of current fish issues and makes an effort to serve fish from sustainable harvest. It has also trained its staff well in knowledge of fish.

Although Botak Jones is just a neighbourhood eatery, we should appreciate it as ecologically conscious, compared to other big seafood restaurants whose staff do not even know what fish they are serving. It is such a shame that some are still serving blue-fin tuna.

Wong Yee Man (Ms)


Read more!

The art of sustainable sustainability

Business Times 3 Nov 09;

Brands have an opportunity to contribute to the sustainability movement by creating demand for products and services that better our world. Devising a smart sustainability strategy is a necessity.

SUSTAINABILITY has become a catchphrase, applied to anything from cars to economics to agriculture and in so many contexts, that its meaning has become muddled and diffused.

And nowhere is confusion more visible than among marketers. While many understand the moral obligation of going green, most lack a clear definition of what sustainability means to their brand. This represents a missed opportunity to create a meaningful proposition and long-term value.

The 1987 United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development report, Our Common Future, defined sustainability as 'development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. In other words, behave responsibly, don't take more than your share, and put back what you use.

While this may seem like a simple enough request, in reality it demands a profound change in perspective. After all, as consumers, we are used to making day-to-day choices based on what we want and need at that moment, and sustainability demands we do just the opposite: It asks that we consider our individual actions as part of a sustainable whole. This is in part why, according to Deloitte, 95 per cent of shoppers say they would consider buying a green product, but 47 per cent of shoppers see green products and don't purchase them.

While changing behaviour is no easy task, brands have an opportunity to help forge a better future. They can influence behaviour by informing the choices we make both rationally and emotionally. Brands have an opportunity to contribute to the sustainability movement by creating demand for products and services that better our world.

And yet, more than an opportunity, devising a smart sustainability strategy is a necessity. A number of factors are contributing to a changing landscape in which sustainability figures prominently.

The first is the increased pressure on individuals to 'do good'. This was perhaps best distilled by US President Barack Obama when he hailed this era the 'new age of responsibility'. His words hit a nerve not just in the US but globally.

Awareness is also on the rise. While purchase decisions may not yet reflect this, consumers are thinking about the excesses that led to today's economic situation and are beginning to seek out a 'less is more' lifestyle.

Even more than raised awareness, regulatory pressure is forcing more organisations to conduct business in a sustainable way. As a result, sustainability is even becoming a cost of entry to doing business.

Incentivisation is also changing today's landscape. In Switzerland, the government has strictly enforced recycling and anti-littering regulations. Further, citizens are given a financial incentive to recycle as much as possible, since recycling is free. As a result, Switzerland has become one the world's top recyclers.

Change is also being motivated by profit. Energy Star, the joint programme of the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Energy, helps save money and protect the environment through energy-efficient products and practices. Businesses have jumped on board because of both the cost-saving benefits and prestige.

A recent study by the National Environmental Education Foundation's Business and Environment Programme shows that for most companies, there is no single department that is entrusted with sustainability implementation. In fact, only one in 10 employees who participate in these programmes feels completely prepared to tackle sustainability head on.

Other businesses have implemented initiatives in a haphazard manner. Feeling the pressure to follow, they have looked to others - the few leaders that have taken charge in recent years - and mimicked their practices. While these companies may be getting away with riding coat-tails for the time being, as awareness increases, more businesses will be held accountable by public expectations and government regulations.

Businesses that have simply 'greenwashed' - said but not done - will be identified and cast out, not just by environmental groups, but by the general public as well. Sustainability will become ingrained in the fabric of how all companies do business.

That's why it is so important to craft a distinctive, relevant, and lasting proposition that will differentiate your brand. Do the right thing and do it right. It is not about saying that you are going to build a proposition that separates you from the rest; it's about building a proposition that is right for your brand and relevant to your industry.

If you look at any of the Best Global Brands, you'll see that they create value by generating demand, reducing risk, and securing future earnings for their business. They do this by translating to customers what is relevant in today's world and influencing buying behaviour. Due to distinct offerings, they develop a strong relationship with customers, and this leads to repeat purchasing. We need to view sustainability with the same lens.

If we can combine the rigor of branding with the aspirations of sustainability, we can begin creating long-lasting impact. Real change will come about when we see corporations start integrating sustainability as part of their business strategy and delivering it through the brand strategy.

This does not mean just reporting carbon emissions and showing transparency. While these are great steps, they do not contribute to changing behaviour. On the other hand, if businesses begin intercepting consumers' lives, approaching sustainability as they do brand, making their products and services the vehicles to deliver the message, they will create change.

Where to start

While no formula will be the same for every business, three essential points should be taken into consideration.

Set the highest standard for your industry.

Your goal should be to consistently uphold the highest standards in your industry and continue to push your success to higher standards. This is the definition for sustainability that's sustainable.

Measure the impact of your actions.

This is no small task, particularly in this economic climate when market values are fluctuating. However, you can measure the effectiveness of your sustainability efforts through the impact your brand has on influencing behaviour. This is where you will derive the most value.

Communicate your platform appropriately.

Communicate your platform so that you are always 'saying what you do and doing what you say'. Today's socially conscious consumer is increasingly holding brands accountable. A balanced message that communicates your aspirations but acknowledges reality is the right approach.

This article was contributed by Interbrand, one of the largest brand consultancies in the world. For more on Interbrand and the Best Global Brands, visit www.interbrand.com


Read more!

Warehousing, too, may go underground in Singapore

Study to examine feasibility of centre at Tanjong Kling
Ronnie Lim, Business Times 3 Nov 09;

(SINGAPORE) The push for underground is gathering momentum.

A feasibility study will be carried out into an underground warehousing, logistics and data centre at Tanjong Kling in Jurong. This comes soon after the government disclosed plans to build an underground science city (USC) at Kent Ridge.
'Both projects could be undertaken concurrently if the studies prove feasible,' a Jurong Town Corporation (JTC) spokeswoman said yesterday.

On Friday, the government called for a consultant to carry out 'geological investigation and ground characterisation' studies at Tanjong Kling. This is expected to take up to five months.

The move comes after a July tender was closed for a consultant to carry out feasibility studies into the Kent Ridge project. JTC is still evaluating the tender bids.

The appointed USC consultant - working to a 14-month deadline - will assess the maximum-size cavern complex that can be built there, as well as its impact on the environment and working population at Kent Ridge. It will also have to provide ballpark cost estimates for the project.

The studies on the two underground projects follow the recent start of construction work on the $1 billion first phase of the Jurong Rock Cavern (JRC) to store oil and petrochemicals on Jurong Island.

The move towards underground facilities comes as industrial land here is fast running out.

On Jurong Island proper, for instance, 75 per cent of the island's 3,000ha has already been taken up or reserved by petrochemical investors.

'The latest Tanjong Kling project would free up 45ha of land for other uses,' the JTC spokeswoman said.

The other advantages of going underground for a warehousing, logistics and data centre are that 'it would be shielded from heat and temperature humidity, have low background radiation and less disturbance from vibration'.

The Tanjong Kling area was chosen as a potential site after earlier studies of geological conditions, the JTC spokeswoman said. It could provide cavern space of more than 1.1 million square metres.

The site comprises Tanjong Kling and Jurong Hill and is bounded by four roads - Jalan Ahmad Ibrahim, Jurong Pier Road, Jalan Buroh and Pioneer Road.

The USC project at Kent Ridge spans 20ha below science parks 1,2 and 3 and Kent Ridge Park.

The area is near one-north, the National University of Singapore and National University Hospital, where research and development activities are pursued.

The JRC, USC and Tanjong Kling projects are part of a wide-ranging, 10-use underground rock cavern feasibility study called by the government in May last year.

The other possible uses are for incineration plants, water reclamation plants and wafer fabs.


Read more!

Kite-flying near airport - let's be safe rather than sorry

Straits Times Forum 3 Nov 09;

I THANK Mr Sim Peng Shin for his Forum Online letter, 'Review kite-flying ban east of Bedok Jetty' (Oct 21).

As the safety of aircraft operations should not be compromised, the potential hazard posed by a kite to an aircraft if it is ingested by the aircraft engine cannot be taken lightly.

Therefore, consistent with best practices around the world, flying of kites is not allowed within 5km of an airport as a matter of policy.

The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore will conduct a detailed safety study and explore specific safeguards that can be effectively implemented for the varied range of kites.

We thank Mr Sim for his feedback.

Ng Tee Chiou
Director
Air Traffic Services Division
Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

Review kite-flying ban east of Bedok Jetty
Straits Times Forum 21 Oct 09;

I WAS flying a kite with my son at East Coast Park on Sunday at about 6.30pm, about 200m east of Bedok Jetty, when I was told by a National Parks Board (NParks) officer that it was illegal to fly kites there.

He said kite flying was allowed to the west of Bedok Jetty. Being in the aviation business, I told the officer that there was no risk of my $5 kite detaching and entering the engine intakes of an airliner. Planes from Changi Airport were also taking off towards the south, which meant that they would be much higher.

The kite-flying policy should be reviewed. How does a kite flying at less than 30m off the ground just east of Bedok Jetty affect airline operations out of Changi Airport? The nearest horizontal distance between the kite and an airliner on approach is about 1.8km. The nearest vertical separation is about 245m.

Sim Peng Shin


Read more!

Species' extinction threat grows: IUCN Red List update

BBC News 2 Nov 09;

More than a third of species assessed in a major international biodiversity study are threatened with extinction, scientists have warned.

Out of the 47,677 species in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 17,291 were deemed to be at serious risk.

These included 21% of mammals, 30% of amphibians, 70% of plants and 35% of invertebrates.

Conservationists warned that not enough was being done to tackle the main threats, such as habitat loss.

"The scientific evidence of a serious extinction crisis is mounting," warned Jane Smart, director of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) Biodiversity Conservation Group.

"The latest analysis... shows that the 2010 target to reduce biodiversity loss will not be met," she added.

"It's time for governments to start getting serious about saving species and make sure it's high on their agendas for next year, as we are rapidly running out of time."

The Red List, regarded as the most authoritative assessment of the state of the planet's species, draws on the work of thousands of scientists around the globe.

The latest update lists amphibians as the most seriously affected group of organisms on the planet, with 1,895 of the 6,285 known species listed as threatened.

Of these, it lists 39 species as either "extinct" or "extinct in the wild". A further 484 are deemed "critically endangered", 754 "endangered" and 657 "vulnerable".

The Kihansi Spray Toad ( Nectophyrnoides asperginis ) is one species that has seen its status change from critically endangered to extinct in the wild.

It was only found in the Kihamsi Falls area of Tanzania, but its population had crashed in recent years from a high of an estimated 17,000 individuals.

Conservationists suggest that the rapid decline was primarily the result of of a dam being constructed upstream from the toads' habitat, which resulted in a 90% reduction in the flow of water.

"In our lifetime, we have gone from having to worry about a relatively small number of highly threatened species to the collapse of entire ecosystems," observed Professor Jonathan Baillie, director of conservation programmes at the Zoological Society of London (ZSL).

"At what point will society truly respond to this growing crisis?"

The updated data from the 2009 Red List is being made publicly available on the IUCN website on Tuesday.

Red alert: scientists identify 17,000 endangered species
Conservation groups warn of 'alarming' loss of biodiversity as thousands of animals face imminent extinction

Andy McSmith, The Independent 3 Nov 09;

Six years ago, these tiny mustard-coloured toads could be found in their thousands, living under the spray from an African waterfall. No one even knew they existed until 1996. Yet today the Kihansi spray toad will be declared extinct in the wild, a symbol of the plight facing 17,000 species that are slipping towards obscurity.

In the case of this charming creature, which unusually for a toad does not start life as a tadpole but as a tiny purple-hued toadlet, a dam and a fungus have combined to bring about its extermination.

Almost one-third of amphibians are at risk, making them the most endangered group on the planet, according to the latest Red List of Threatened Species, published today by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. The registers assesses the status of 47,677 species. Of the 6,285 assessed amphibian types, 1,895 are in peril.

The Kihansi spray toad, three-quarters of an inch long when fully grown, lived in a wild gorge beneath the Kihansi waterfall in Tanzania. As recently as June 2003 there were reckoned to be almost 21,000 of them; it was only officially discovered in the mid-1990s, when an environmental study was carried out to test the impact of a power dam that the Tanzanian government proposed to build above the waterfall.

Work on the dam began in 2000, and an artificial spray system was used to protect the toads. But in 2003, it broke down. At about the same time, the dam was briefly opened to flush out sediments, including pesticides which sluiced across the toads' habitat. By the following January, the sound of the male toad calling for his mate had all but disappeared.

With their numbers down and their resistance weakened, the toads were finished off by the fungal disease chytridiomycosis. The only known survivors are in zoos.

In 2006, the chytrid fungus also made an ominous appearance in that part of the jungle of central Panama that is home to Rabb's Fringe-Limbed Tree Frog, a much large creature than the Kihansi Spray Toad, which used its huge feet to glide from tree tops to the ground. The male of this frog, uniquely, allows tadpoles to feed by scraping nutrients off his back. But the male's call has been heard only once since the fungus was first spotted, and all attempts to breed this frog in captivity have so far failed.

"The continued and unprecedented loss of species must not be accepted as just a sad reality we can do nothing about," said Mark Wright, conservation science advisor at WWF-UK. "Biodiversity loss is an alarming indicator of the general health of our planet and of the well-being of our own species. We must act to halt this decline."

Of the world's 5,490 mammals, 79 are extinct in the wild, 188 critically endangered, 449 endangered, and 505 vulnerable.

The Eastern Voalavo, a rodent found only in the tropical forest of Madagascar, features on the red list as an "endangered" species for the first time because slash-and-burn is destroying its habitat.

The new list features 293 reptiles which were not there last year, bringing the total threatened to 1,677, including 469 that face extinction and 22 are that are believed extinct. On the Philippine islands alone, 165 endemic species of reptile have been included for the first time, such as the herbivorous Panay Monitor Lizard, and the spectacular Sail-fin Water Lizard, which can be a metre long and is so named because it has a "sail" at the end of its tail which it uses for propulsion through the water. The young walk on water, using their large, flattened toes. Both species are under threat from the destruction of their habitat and because they are hunted for food.

The new red list also includes 12,151 plants, among them the extraordinary Queen of the Andes, found high up in Peru and Bolivia, which seeds only once in 80 years before dying and grows up to 9ft tall. It is suffering from climate change and is being trampled or eaten by free-roaming cattle.

There are also 7,615 invertebrates, such as the Giant Jewel, a huge, red dragonfly found in south-east Nigeria and south-west Cameroon, vulnerable because of the destruction of the forest; and 3,120 freshwater fishes, of which 1,147 are close to extinction. The Brown Mudfish, found only in New Zealand, which can survive out of water during a drought by burying itself in the mud, has been moved into the "vulnerable" category because drainage, irrigation or land development has destroyed up to 90 per cent of its wetlands habitat.

"The scientific evidence of a serious extinction crisis is mounting," said Jane Smart, Director of IUCN's Biodiversity Conservation Group. "January sees the launch of the International Year of Biodiversity. The latest analysis of the IUCN Red List shows the 2010 target to reduce biodiversity loss will not be met. It's time for governments to start getting serious about saving species and make sure it's high on their agendas for next year, as we're rapidly running out of time."

Lizards, rodent, frog added to endangered list
Frank Jordans, Associated Press Yahoo News 3 Nov 09;

GENEVA – A rare tree frog found only in central Panama could soon croak its last, as deforestation and infection push the species toward extinction, an environmental group said Tuesday.

The Rabb's fringe-limbed tree frog, which only became known to science four years ago, is one of 1,895 amphibian species that could soon disappear in the wild, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Switzerland-based IUCN surveyed a total of 47,677 animals and plants for this year's "Red List" of endangered species and determined that 17,291 of them are threatened with extinction.

More than one in five of all known mammals, over a quarter of reptiles and 70 percent of plants are under threat, according to the survey, which featured over 2,800 new species compared with 2008.

"These results are just the tip of the iceberg," said Craig Hilton-Taylor, who manages the list. He said "many more millions" of species that have yet to be assessed could also be under serious threat.

The only mammal to be added to the list this year is the Eastern Voalavo, a rodent that lives in the mountainous forests of Madagascar. IUCN classified it as "endangered" — two steps from extinction in the wild — because its habitat is being destroyed by slash-and-burn farming.

The Red List already includes species such as the tiger, of which only 3,200 are thought to exist in the wild and whose habitat in Asia is steadily shrinking due to encroachment by humans. Governments and international conservation bodies use the list as guidance when deciding which species to place under legal protection.

The group added almost 300 reptiles this year, including the Panay monitor lizard and the sail-fin water lizard, both of which are hunted for food and threatened by logging in their native Philippines.

Some species have recovered thanks to conservation efforts, IUCN said. The Australian grayling, a freshwater fish, has graduated from "vulnerable" to "near threatened" thanks to fish ladders at dams and other protection measures, the group said.

But for many others conservation efforts are likely to come too late.

The Kihansi spray toad of southern Tanzania is now thought to be extinct in the wild. A dam upstream of the Kihansi Falls has dried up the gorge where it lived, and an aggressive fungal disease known as chytridiomycosis appears to have pushed the toad population over the edge, IUCN said.

The same fate could soon befall the unusually large Rabb's fringe-limbed tree frog, which glides through the forest using its big webbed feet to steer safely to the ground. It is the only known frog species where the tadpoles feed off skin shed by the male while he guards the young.

The chytrid fungus that causes chytridiomycosis reached central Panama in 2006, a year after scientists first discovered the tree frog. Since then the fungus — believed to be spread by international trade and global warming — has virtually wiped out the wild frog population.

"Only a single male has been heard calling since," IUCN said.

Zoo Atlanta scientist Joseph Mendelson was part of the group that identified the frog as a distinct species. He said it is likely that dozens or even hundreds of other amphibians have become or are going to be extinct before they are even discovered.

"This one we caught right before it went off the planet, but other species surely we didn't catch in time," Mendelson told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.

"When you name a new species you're attached to it, and when that species disappears so quickly it's impossible not to have feelings associated with that," he said. "I'm pretty sad to be honest, really sad."

___

On the Net:

IUCN Red List: http://www.iucnredlist.org/

Extinction crisis continues apace
IUCN Press Release 3 Nov 09;

The latest update of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ shows that 17,291 species out of the 47,677 assessed species are threatened with extinction.

The results reveal 21 percent of all known mammals, 30 percent of all known amphibians, 12 percent of all known birds, and 28 percent of reptiles, 37 percent of freshwater fishes, 70 percent of plants, 35 percent of invertebrates assessed so far are under threat.

“The scientific evidence of a serious extinction crisis is mounting,” says Jane Smart, Director of IUCN’s Biodiversity Conservation Group. “January sees the launch of the International Year of Biodiversity. The latest analysis of the IUCN Red List shows the 2010 target to reduce biodiversity loss will not be met. It’s time for Governments to start getting serious about saving species and make sure it’s high on their agendas for next year, as we’re rapidly running out of time.”

Of the world’s 5,490 mammals, 79 are Extinct or Extinct in the Wild, with 188 Critically Endangered, 449 Endangered and 505 Vulnerable. The Eastern Voalavo (Voalavo antsahabensis) appears on the IUCN Red List for the first time in the Endangered category. This rodent, endemic to Madagascar, is confined to montane tropical forest and is under threat from slash-and-burn farming.

There are now 1,677 reptiles on the IUCN Red List, with 293 added this year. In total, 469 are threatened with extinction and 22 are already Extinct or Extinct in the Wild. The 165 endemic Philippine species new to the IUCN Red List include the Panay Monitor Lizard (Varanus mabitang), which is Endangered. This highly-specialized monitor lizard is threatened by habitat loss due to agriculture and logging and is hunted by humans for food. The Sail-fin Water Lizard (Hydrosaurus pustulatus) enters in the Vulnerable category and is also threatened by habitat loss. Hatchlings are heavily collected both for the pet trade and for local consumption.

“The world’s reptiles are undoubtedly suffering, but the picture may be much worse than it currently looks,” says Simon Stuart, Chair of IUCN’s Species Survival Commission. “We need an assessment of all reptiles to understand the severity of the situation but we don’t have the $2-3 million to carry it out.”

The IUCN Red List shows that 1,895 of the planet’s 6,285 amphibians are in danger of extinction, making them the most threatened group of species known to date. Of these, 39 are already Extinct or Extinct in the Wild, 484 are Critically Endangered, 754 are Endangered and 657 are Vulnerable.

The Kihansi Spray Toad (Nectophrynoides asperginis) has moved from Critically Endangered to Extinct in the Wild. The species was only known from the Kihansi Falls in Tanzania, where it was formerly abundant with a population of at least 17,000. Its decline is due to the construction of a dam upstream of the Kihansi Falls that removed 90 percent of the original water flow to the gorge. The fungal disease chytridiomycosis was probably responsible for the toad’s final population crash.

The fungus also affected the Rabb’s Fringe-limbed Treefrog (Ecnomiohyla rabborum), which enters the Red List as Critically Endangered. It is known only from central Panama. In 2006, the chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) was reported in its habitat and only a single male has been heard calling since. This species has been collected for captive breeding efforts but all attempts have so far failed.

Of the 12,151 plants on the IUCN Red List, 8,500 are threatened with extinction, with 114 already Extinct or Extinct in the Wild. The Queen of the Andes (Puya raimondii) has been reassessed and remains in the Endangered category. Found in the Andes of Peru and Bolivia, it only produces seeds once in 80 years before dying. Climate change may already be impairing its ability to flower and cattle roam freely among many colonies, trampling or eating young plants.

There are now 7,615 invertebrates on the IUCN Red List this year, 2,639 of which are threatened with extinction. Scientists added 1,360 dragonflies and damselflies, bringing the total to 1,989, of which 261 are threatened. The Giant Jewel (Chlorocypha centripunctata), classed as Vulnerable, is found in southeast Nigeria and southwest Cameroon and is threatened by forest destruction.

Scientists also added 94 molluscs, bringing the total number assessed to 2,306, of which 1,036 are threatened. All seven freshwater snails from Lake Dianchi in Yunnan Province, China, are new to the IUCN Red List and all are threatened. These join 13 freshwater fishes from the same area, 12 of which are threatened. The main threats are pollution, introduced fish species and overharvesting.

There are now 3,120 freshwater fishes on the IUCN Red List, up 510 species from last year. Although there is still a long way to go before the status all the world’s freshwater fishes is known, 1,147 of those assessed so far are threatened with extinction. The Brown Mudfish (Neochanna apoda), found only in New Zealand, has been moved from Near Threatened to Vulnerable as it has disappeared from many areas in its range. Approximately 85-90 percent of New Zealand's wetlands have been lost or degraded through drainage schemes, irrigation and land development.

"Creatures living in freshwater have long been neglected. This year we have again added a large number of them to the IUCN Red List and are confirming the high levels of threat to many freshwater animals and plants. This reflects the state of our precious water resources. There is now an urgency to pursue our effort but most importantly to start using this information to move towards a wise use of water resources,” says Jean-Christophe Vié, Deputy Head of the IUCN Species Programme.

“This year’s IUCN Red List makes for sobering reading,” says Craig Hilton-Taylor, Manager of the IUCN Red List Unit. “These results are just the tip of the iceberg. We have only managed to assess 47,663 species so far; there are many more millions out there which could be under serious threat. We do, however, know from experience that conservation action works so let’s not wait until it’s too late and start saving our species now.”

The status of the Australian Grayling (Prototroctes maraena), a freshwater fish, has improved as a result of conservation efforts. Now classed as Near Threatened as ctes opposed to Vulnerable, the population has recovered thanks to fish ladders which have been constructed over dams to allow migration, enhanced riverside vegetation and the education of fishermen, who now face heavy penalties if found with this species.

For more information please visit www.iucnredlist.org.

Notes to editors

Photos available to download below.

The latest review of the IUCN Red List, “Wildlife in a Changing World: an analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species” can be downloaded here: http://iucn.org/about/work/programmes/species/red_list/review/

Global figures for 2009 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species:
Total species assessed = 47,677
Total Extinct or Extinct in the Wild = 875 (2%) [Extinct = 809; Extinct in the Wild = 66].
Total threatened = 17,291 (36%) [Critically Endangered = 3,325; Endangered = 4,891; Vulnerable = 9,075].
Total Near Threatened = 3,650 (8%).
Total Lower Risk/conservation dependent = 281 (<1%) [this is an old category that is gradually being phased out of the Red List]
Total Data Deficient = 6,557 (14%)
Total Least Concern = 19,023 (40%)

Global figures for 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species:
Total assessed = 44,838
Total Extinct or Extinct in the Wild = 869 (2%) [Extinct = 804 ; Extinct in the Wild = 65]
Total threatened = 16,928 (38%) [Critically Endangered = 3,246; Endangered = 4,770; Vulnerable = 8,912]
Total Near Threatened = 3,513 (8%)
Total Lower Risk/conservation dependent = 283 (<1%) [this is an old category that is gradually being phased out of the Red List]
Total Data Deficient = 5,570 (12%)
Total Least Concern = 17,675 (39%)

NB: Not all species on the IUCN Red List are threatened. There are now more species on the IUCN Red List. This means that the overall percentage of threatened species has gone down by two percent. This is not because the status of the world’s biodiversity is improving, but because we have assessed more species. In the past, Red List assessments often focused on species that were already thought to be threatened, but as the Red List grows to include more complete assessments across entire groups, we are beginning to have a better idea of the relative proportion of species which are threatened against those which are not threatened.

Red List update shows up global failure to slow biodiversity loss
WWF 3 Nov 09;

Gland, Switzerland: The latest update of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species should cause alarm over the continuing unprecedented loss of species and the failure so far of mechanisms to arrest biodiversity loss, WWF said today.

The 2009 Red List update, issued today by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, shows more than one-third (36 percent) of the 47,677 species assessed are threatened with extinction. The assessment featured a special focus on freshwater species, which are being hit hard by pollution, loss of wetlands and water diversions.

The Red List ranks species according to their population status and threat levels. It shows the effects that habitat loss and degradation, over-exploitation, pollutants and climate change are having on the world’s species.

“As crucial climate talks in Copenhagen draw near and with the International Year of Biodiversity around the corner, this is a wake-up call for world leaders.” said Amanda Nickson, Director of the WWF International Species Programme. “We are a world away from meeting the globally endorsed 2002 commitment of the Convention on Biological Diversity to deliver a significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010.”

“This failure and the mechanisms to overcome it will need to be the dominant agenda item on next year’s meeting of parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”

Growing threat of climate change

Through its global initiatives, WWF is pursuing major efforts to arrest biodiversity decline in some of the most spectacular and highly diverse places on the planet, and to recover populations of some of the most endangered species, such as tigers.

It is estimated that less than 3200 tigers exist in the wild in a wide arc of countries from far eastern Russia to India and Indonesia. Tigers - a top predator residing at the top of its food chain - occupy less than seven percent of their original range, which has contracted 40 percent from 10 years ago.

As tigers require a large home range, protection of the species and its habitat bring huge benefits to thousands of other species. An international summit scheduled for 2010 in Vladivostok in Russia is a critical opportunity to reverse the decline in tiger numbers and ensure their survival in the wild.

“Tigers are a symbol of what is happening to many species across the globe, and demonstrate the urgent need for the world to come up with the political will, policies, resources and incentives to maintain a living and diverse planet.” said Ms Nickson. “The IUCN is frank that its assessments are likely to understate the real extent of the loss of species.”

Significant international meetings next year to address biodiversity loss and the threats to planetary life support systems include a major Conferences of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

Ms Nickson noted that the CBD’s 2010 target had probably underestimated the growing impact of climate change, which is now being increasingly recognised as an additional threat leading species of animals and plants towards extinction. Polar bears earned US endangered status last year on the basis of climate change and the Red List notes more.

The Queen of the Andes, largest of one the world’s cactus families which dies on flowering and setting seed after an average 80 year growing span, may be having its ability to flower impaired by climate change.

Alarm on freshwater species

The assessment of freshwater species continued to alarm, with more than one third of assessed freshwater fishes under threat of extinction and approaching half of all molluscs. In Lake Dianchi in China, the assessment found all seven freshwater snails and 12 of the 13 freshwater fish species new to the Red List were threatened by overharvesting, pollution and introduced fish species.

The planet’s amphibians are the most threatened of all species with 1895 of 6285 species assessed in the Red List threatened with extinction.

However, in a rare ray of hope in the new assessment, one freshwater fish, the Australian Grayling has been moved from being listed as Vulnerable to being listed as Near Threatened as a result of conservation efforts which included putting fish ladders on dams, improving streamside vegetation and policing anglers.

Over 1,000 fish species 'threatened with extinction'
Yahoo News 3 Nov 09;

GENEVA (AFP) – More than 1,000 freshwater fish species are threatened with extinction, reflecting the strain on global water resources, an updated global "Red List" of endangered species showed Tuesday.

The list by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is the most respected inventory of biodiversity covering more than 47,000 of the world's species.

Scientists looked at 3,120 freshwater fish this year, 510 more than a year ago. They found that 1,147, or a third, are now threatened with extinction.

"Creatures living in freshwater have long been neglected," said Jean-Christophe Vie, deputy head of species programme at the IUCN.

"This year we have again added a large number of them to the IUCN Red List and are confirming the high levels of threat to many freshwater animals and plants.

"This reflects the state of our previous water resources. There is now an urgency to pursue our effort but more importantly, to start using this information to move towards a wise use of water resources."

The scientists also added 1,360 species of dragonflies and damselflies to the Red List, and found that out of 1,989 in all, 261 were at risk of disappearing.

Dragonflies provided a good gauge of the state of freshwater ecosystems as "many are very sensitive" to changes, said Vie.

"We found that they are highly threatened wherever we looked," he said, noting that water resources were under strain due to pollution and intensive usage.

Meanwhile, the tiny Kihansi Spray Toad, which once numbered at least 17,000 at the Kihansi Falls in Tanzania, joined the list of creatures which are now extinct in the wild.

"Its decline is due to the construction of a dam upstream of the Kihansi Falls that removed 90 percent of the original water flow to the gorge," said the IUCN in a statement.

Overall, this year's survey found that over a third, or 17,291 species out of 47,677 assessed are now threatened with extinction.

Last year, the Red List examined 44,838 species and found that a similar proportion (16,298 species) were close to becoming extinct.

"What we haven't got this year is good news," said Vie.

The overall situation may be worse than reflected according to the IUCN, since data was lacking for 14 percent of the species surveyed.

In addition, the survey only covers a fraction of the world's species.

"These results are just the tip of the iceberg. We have only managed to assess 47,663 species so far; there are many more millions out there which could be under serious threat," said Craig Hilton-Taylor, manager of the IUCN Red List unit.

The environmental group WWF also urged action, saying the latest Red List update "should cause alarm over the continuing unprecedented loss of species and the failure so far of mechanisms to arrest biodiversity loss."

"As crucial climate talks in Copenhagen draw near and with the International Year of Biodiversity around the corner, this is a wake-up call for world leaders," said Amanda Nickson, Director of the WWF International Species Programme.


Read more!

China threatened by 400 invasive alien species: expert

www.chinaview.cn xinhua 3 Nov 09;

FUZHOU, Nov. 2 (Xinhua) -- China is threatened by more than 400 invasive alien species, which has caused billions of yuan of economic losses, an agricultural official said Monday.

"We have discovered more than 400 harmful species alien to the country so far," said Wan Fanghao, vice director with the Research Center for Invasive Alien Species Prevention and Control of China's Ministry of Agriculture. "More than 100 of them are widely spread in the country and have caused great losses."

Wan made the remarks while attending the ongoing International Congress on Biological Invasion in the southeastern Fujian Province.

More than 500 experts from 50 countries and regions around the globe are attending the congress to address the threats of invasive alien species.

Wan warned that the situation in China was very severe. "Due to these invasive alien species, China is now suffering a direct economic losses of at least 50 billion yuan (7.3 billion U.S. dollars) while the total economic losses are about 130 billion."

Statistics showed that more than half of the 100 dangerous alien species listed by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) have been found in China.

An alien species, when invading a new environment without being monitored, is apt to proliferate and form a mono-dominant community, competing for living spaces previously enjoyed by local species.

"They are ruining bio-diversity, threatening the ecological system and driving local species to extinction," Wan said.

Chen Wanquan, vice head of the Institute of Plant Protection of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, said China has invested millions of dollars in tackling invasive alien species.

But risks are growing along with the expanding global trade.

At the congress, scientists urged the international community to work together to defuse the threat of the invasive alien species.

"No country can do it on its own," said Dennis Rangi, Executive Director of CAB International (CABI), formerly known as the Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.

"It's going to be done at the global level, to make sure that we are working as a team dealing with the new species," he said.


Read more!

Nature Conservancy CEO out to 'save the world'

* Nature Conservancy aims to unleash market forces
* Has $1.3 billion in assets to conserve ecosystems
Andrew Stern, Reuters 23 Oct 09;

CHICAGO, Oct 23 (Reuters) - The biggest conservation organization in the world says it needs help saving the world's diminishing storehouse of unspoiled nature.

The president and chief executive of the Washington-based Nature Conservancy wants to enlist countries and corporations to preserve rain forests and other ecosystems by unleashing market forces and by opening eyes.

The Conservancy has quietly moved over the past half-century to protect some 119 million acres (48 million hectares) of land around the world -- an area slightly larger than California.

It has also protected 5,000 miles (8,000 km) of rivers and 100 marine sanctuaries, but wants to do more and to raise its profile, said its leader, Mark Tercek.

Most recently, the organization purchased a large swath of Montana that is prime grizzly bear habitat and helped engineer a compromise among loggers, native peoples and conservationists over a huge forest along Canada's West Coast.

"We have this vision or mission to basically save the world," Tercek said.

"As good as we are, and as proud as we are of all our projects, if you add them all up it doesn't seem to really move the needle. So we now have to achieve conservation on an even greater scale. How do we do that?"

CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Tercek said he can show policymakers how conservation and economic development can co-exist.

He is lobbying the U.S. Congress and participants in upcoming climate talks in Copenhagen to give developed countries like the United States incentives to pay billions of dollars to developing nations. They, in turn, would preserve rain forests and other ecosystems that are carbon stores.

By preventing deforestation that would release carbon as greenhouse gases, developed nations can offset their own emissions and buy time to reduce carbon footprints through energy conservation and developing renewable energy.

Tercek insisted the money transfer works, pointing to projects in Indonesia, Bolivia and Brazil as examples.

The Conservancy has also worked with energy giants like BP in Wyoming to conserve unspoiled land in exchange for drilling rights.

Tercek, 52, is a Goldman Sachs veteran picked to lead the Nature Conservancy 15 months ago. He institutionalized the Wall Street firm's environmental conscience by melding the interests of clients to environmental forces.

The organization he now heads has $1.3 billion in assets and a $450 million annual budget, which he said gives it more resources than any other conservation group.

The recession cut into the Conservancy's endowment and curbed contributions from its many wealthy donors, so it trimmed its 4,000-person staff by 400 this year.

"We want to do projects like these forest carbon projects that can be enormous and harness market power," Tercek said.

"The other thing we want to do is we need to have a broader understanding of why conservation matters. Why it's in everyone's economic interest. Why it's not a luxury good for rich people, but why poor people should care about it." (Editing by Chris Wilson)


Read more!

Palm oil CO2 targets delayed as planters, NGOs clash

Niluksi Koswanage, Reuters 2 Nov 09;

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Planned palm oil carbon emission targets will be delayed by at least a year as planters clash with NGOs on calculating the vegetable oil's environmental impact, officials said on Monday.

The measure was aimed at combating the negative image of palm oil output, which green groups say has been partly fueled by producers in Southeast Asia cutting down swathes of rainforests and draining carbon-rich peatlands.

But Malaysian and Indonesian producers say imposing limits on land expansion based on greenhouse gas emissions was an unfair barrier to trade as oil palm estates could act as net carbon sink.

The CO2 targets were delayed by a year pending further study and watered down to a voluntary undertaking during the Roundtable of Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) that brings together producers, buyers and NGOS this week in the Malaysian capital.

"We are disappointed because we wanted the target for this year," said Jan Kees Vis, chairman of the RSPO, which has been tasked with formulating a green standard for the industry.

"However, looking at how even the Copenhagen climate talks may not even reach a resolution in December, perhaps its not too bad. It's part and parcel of trying to get everyone to agree."

Once hailed as a biofuel feedstock that can cut the world's reliance on petroleum diesel, palm oil now struggles with a negative image that estate expansion fuels climate change.

New oil palm estates often replace tropical forests that absorb carbon dioxide and production of the vegetable oil releases high quantities of methane gas, scientists and green groups say.

Palm oil producers say CO2 standards such as the European Union's move to use biofuels that reduce emissions by at least 35 percent versus fossil fuel in 2010 are trade barriers, sidelining palm oil which the E.U. considers to save 19 percent.

DIFFERENCES

Differences over palm oil's eco-credentials have often made it difficult for the RSPO to come up with a consensus.

It was only last year that producers and green groups hammered out a set of criteria for palm oil produced without harming wildlife or displacing local communities, despite the RSPO being in existence since 2002.

"We agree on some conditions and then they (green groups) throw something at us," said a Malaysian planter who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"I won't be surprised in some of the planters get fed up and walk out of this."

Part of the producers' anger stems from the slow uptake of certified green palm oil during the economic crisis, observers said. WWF last week issued a buyer's scorecard that showed most European palm oil buyers have shunned green palm oil priced at a premium.

"The scorecard will benchmark the industry. There is some progress with palm oil buyers, the producers should be heartened by this," said Adam Harrison, senior policy officer of WWF International, who came up with the scorecard.

(Editing by Michael Urquhart)

European palm oil buyers shun 'eco-friendly variety'
Beh Lih Yi AFP Google News 2 Nov 09;

KUALA LUMPUR — European palm oil buyers who are refusing to purchase expensive eco-friendly palm oil were named and shamed Monday by environmental campaigners WWF International.

Only 10 out of the 59 major retailers and manufacturers surveyed in an industry scorecard have lived up to their commitments to buy "sustainable" palm oil which is manufactured according to strict standards, it said.

At an industry conference in the Malaysian capital, WWF said that less than one-fifth of the 1.0 million tonnes of sustainable palm oil produced in the past year has been sold.

"There are those companies which have shown it can be done," WWF International senior policy officer Adam Harrison told a press conference.

"For everybody else we need to make sure the pressure is there and they follow through with action."

Palm oil -- used extensively across the globe for biofuel, processed food and toiletries -- has been vilified by environmental campaigners for causing deforestation and threatening the survival of species such as orangutans.

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) was formed in 2004 to establish stringent social and environmental criteria including a ban on clearing forests in order to plant the crop.

But the WWF scorecard showed that while companies such as Sainsbury's and Marks & Spencer in Britain and Migros of Switzerland were meeting their pledges to use more expensive sustainable palm oil, others were not.

Those on the bottom of the list included Danone of France and giant retailer Aldi.

WWF said that 19 of the 59 companies scored between zero and three out of 29 possible points, "meaning that they have taken very little or no action to curb their use of non-certified palm oil".

It urged the better-performing firms to move towards using 100 percent certified palm oil, and said that another review would be conducted in two years, eventually expanding to include palm oil buyers in other regions.

"Many producers have been disappointed with the very slow offtake of certified sustainable palm oil," said Carl Bek-Nielsen from United Plantations, one of the best-regarded operations in Malaysia.

He said that just five percent of its certified production had been sold as sustainable, with the small premium it attracts.

"Before RSPO palm became available, there were many people who were screaming and shouting for RSPO palm. When it became available, most of these big buyers just disappeared out the door like greased lightening," he told AFP.

"They have let the producers down in a way. They have asked us to go ahead and produce this thing and live up to these very stringent criteria -- the strictest for any agricultural crop."

Bek-Nielsen said the industry reluctance had "cost us a lot of money" but that the WWF scorecard was a landmark in raising awareness, and he was hopeful things would now improve.

WWF also said it was heartened by pledges from dozens of companies to lift their use of sustainable palm oil.

"The commitment is there, we know those volumes will come in over the next three or four years," Harrison said.

"The number of phone calls enquiring about certified palm oil is increasing. There is a lot of optimism that it's going to rebalance itself."

Malaysia is the world's second-largest exporter of palm oil after Indonesia, and the industry is the country's third largest export earner, raking in 65.2 billion ringgit (19 billion dollars) last year.

Q+A: Palm planters, buyers and NGOs face off at roundtable
Niluksi Koswanage, Reuters 2 Nov 09;

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - The palm oil industry confronts critics and consumers in a meeting this week in Malaysia as it looks to beef up green standards that already include commitments to preserve rainforests and wildlife.

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), whose members include buyers and NGOs, wants to discuss standards on greenhouse gas savings that palm oil should achieve before the Copenhagen climate change talks in December.

But with European firms reluctant to take up pricier palm oil certified under RSPO and a longstanding tussle between environment groups and the palm oil industry over its green credentials, the meeting may fall apart, observers say.

Here are some questions and answers on the issues that will be raised during the RSPO meeting, the seventh since 2001:

WHAT'S THE ISSUE WITH CO2 EMISSIONS?

Palm oil producers have been at loggerheads with green groups over how the tropical oil's impact on the environment should be calculated as they try to counter criticism that the industry fuels climate change.

Planters in top producers Indonesia and Malaysia say that oil palm estates can act as a carbon sink and that a major CO2 saving can come from capturing methane, a powerful greenhouse gas emitted during processing.

Environmentalists say any expansion of plantations should be stopped as chopping down and burning rainforests produces the most emissions in the life cycle of oil palm estates.

Both groups agree that expanding into carbon-rich peatland forests found mostly in Indonesia are a no-go, a rare consensus that may help them to hammer out an agreement for an industry standard on palm oil's greenhouse gas savings.

HOW ABOUT MAKING GOVERNMENTS ACCOUNTABLE?

The Malaysian and Indonesian governments are not a part of the RSPO and their own development policies for the industry make it difficult for planters to become eco-friendly.

For instance, Indonesia ended a freeze on new permits for developing estates on peatlands early this year as it seeks to expand the industry, a key revenue earner.

Planters who are RSPO members have pledged to stay away from peatlands and other natural forests but say they will lose valuable expansion opportunities to other companies who do not belong to the RSPO.

WHO WILL BUY PRICEY GREEN PALM OIL?

Price-conscious shoppers in Europe, a key palm oil consumer, have found it difficult to stomach higher-priced palm oil that has been certified under RSPO as the global economy takes its time to recover.

Much of the extra cost comes in hiring auditors to ensure palm oil is produced without harming wildlife and oppressing local communities as well as building new storage tanks and processors to "green" the supply chain.

Producers say their efforts have been wasted as European supermarkets are just passing the costs to the consumers without sharing the burden and warn that they might turn their backs on the RSPO.

Some European buyers have tried offering discounts although they say that food demand has been weaker across the board due to the economic crisis.

But many European retailers and manufacturers have yet to take up green palm oil in a big way, a scorecard by WWF has shown.


Read more!

Move to restore Selangor mangrove forests

Story and photos by SALINA KHALID, The Star 3 Nov 09;

YEARS ago, the whole of the Pulau Indah coastal area off Klang, was covered with mangrove trees. Now, only about 20% of the trees remain.

“This island used to be covered with 2,000ha to 3,000ha of mangrove forest but now only a small portion of it is left.

“Part of the area, which used to be a forest reserve had been degazetted a few years ago, allowing development but at the cost of these mangroves.

“Even areas that were not supposed to be affected suffered damage,” said Global Environment Centre (GEC) director Faizal Parish.

The trees were chopped to make way for development which also involved land clearing to provide access to the site.

Water flow into the mangrove forest was also interrupted due to the creation of an access road and this contributed to the damage.

“Some of the areas are recovering naturally, in others, the damage is still visible,” added Faizal.

In efforts to restore the mangroves, GEC together with the Selangor Forestry Department have started replanting activities in the area.

The first activity was launched on Saturday with about 1,500 bakau kurap (Rhizophora mucronata) saplings planted in the eastern tip of the island.

About 300 people, including the local community and students from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tengku Ampuan Jemaah, Sekolah Menengah Datuk Hamzah, Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pandamaran Jaya and Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Perempuan Raja Zarina, took part in the exercise.

In addition to creating awareness on the importance of preserving the mangroves and its eco-system, the programme also hoped to instil a sense of ownership among the participants.

Despite the early morning drizzle, the participants got into the mudflats for the tree-planting.

“We want them to know how difficult it is to plant this tree and as such should not be chopped down easily.

“It is a living thing and they have to realise that there is a possibility that it might not survive,” said Faizal.

He hoped that the participants, especially the students, would come back to visit the trees that they had planted and help ensure their survival.

Faizal said they had chosen the site after finding it suitable for restoration.

He said although the area was damaged due to the nearby development, it had high potential for restoration.

“The water flow has improved and this will help the trees to survive. In some areas, we can see new trees, indicating that the area is recovering naturally.

“So these sapplings that we are planting will complement those that are growing naturally,” he said.

However, Faizal said it would take between three and four years for the restoration efforts to show results.

Mangroves are tropical trees and shrubs growing on sheltered coastlines, mudflats and riverbanks. They cover some 14 million hectares worldwide and are concentrated within 25 degrees North and South of the Equator.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, in 2007, about one third of the world’s mangroves were found in Asia (39%) followed by Africa (21%) and North and Central America (15%).

Mangrove forests in Selangor are found mainly along the coastline of the Sabak Bernam, Kuala Selangor, Klang, Kuala Langat and Sepang.

Almost 72% of mangrove forest reserves in Selangor are located in the Klang district. They are the Kapar mangrove forest, Klang mangroves, Teluk Gedong and Jugra Blok 1.

In Selangor, mangroves cover 18,088ha with 5,612ha of it in the islands off Klang and 2,365ha in Pulau Ketam.

Both Pulau Tengah and Pulau Che Mat Zin each have about 1,400ha of mangrove forest.

The Klang islands (a group of islands) are mangrove islands in the estuary of the Sg Kelang with mudflats and sandflats. Klang islands are of national importance because these are excellent examples of an estuarine mangrove mudflat system.

The islands are also the most important site for migratory shorebirds and fish-breeding ground which support coastal fishery activities.

Recently, the Selangor government announced that they will no longer be issuing permits for logging on government land, effective from next year.

This also covers logging activities for all inland and the mangrove forests in the state.

“As the most developed and highly populated state, mangroves in Selangor have faced tremendous pressure from land development and pollution.

“It is estimated that from 1980 to 1998, almost 47% of the original mangrove forest reserve in Selangor has been lost to aquaculture, housing and industrial development,” said Faizal.

Despite the salinity and water levels that can change daily, mangroves, adapt well to cope in this environment and thrive.

With roots clustered together to form a natural barrier to break the strong waves from hitting the shore, these mangroves also house various species of marine life, making them a haven for both fishermen and shore birds.

Destroying the mangrove forests will significantly reduce these marine life such as prawns and mud- crabs and would affect the livelihood of mangrove fishermen.

Mangroves have one of the most unique reproductive strategies in the plant world. It disperses its cigar-shaped propagules (seed) via water.

All the sapplings for the replanting programme came from the Forestry Department’s own nursery in Klang.

The department’s deputy director for silviculture and forest protection, Samsu Anuar Nawi, said the mangrove sapplings were kept at the nursery for about four months before being planted.

He said the bakau kurap (Rhizophora mucronata) was chosen for the programme because these have a higher market value and are commonly used for construction and to make charcoal.

The species is used for piling at construction sites.

“We are concentrating on government land due to the damage done from the development surrounding the mangrove areas.

“Previously we carried out several activities in Sabak Bernam and this is the first time we are carrying it out in Pulau Indah,” he said.

The replanting programme is part of efforts to restore the rich bio-diversity of the forests to provide an ecosystem for fish, crabs, birds and other creatures and plants.

Studies have also shown that the mangroves could protect coastal areas from rising tides, storms and natural erosion.

The trees have a high storage capacity for carbon, which helps to regulate the quantity of carbon dioxide in the environment.

They function like carbon factories by absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert­ing them into organic material.

The organic materials are then absorbed into trees, mudflats and nearby waterways, reducing the amount of greenhouse gases.

Harvesting mangroves is allowed in the country, with the logging permit issued by the relevant state Forestry Department.

According to the Malaysian Nature Society, only 1.8% of Malaysia’s land is covered in mangroves, with over 50% of these mangroves lost between 1950 and 1985.

Forestry Department statistics show that Peninsular Malaysia had 85,000ha of mangrove swamp forest in 2003, down from 86,497ha in 2002.

The Selangor Forestry Depart­ment statistics show that last year, 18,088ha of the coastal area in the state was covered with mangrove forest.

Under Section 15 of the National Forestry Act, 1984 (Amendment 1993) those who conduct illegal logging can be fined up to a maximum of RM500,000 and mandatory imprisonment of one to 20 years.

Meanwhile, those who are caught having this wood without the documentation can be fined up to RM50,000.


Read more!

Huge Oil Spill Off Australia Reaches Indonesia, Affecting Fishermen

AFP, Jakarta Globe 2 Nov 09;

A massive oil spill off northwest Australia has hit Indonesia, killing fish and destroying livelihoods in poor villages along the Timor Sea, a non-governmental group said Monday.

About 7,000 fishermen in East Nusa Tenggara province have been affected by the spill from the Thai-operated West Atlas rig, which has dumped thousands of barrels of oil into the Timor Sea since August 21, the group said.

“After the leak started the fishermen’s income dropped 40 percent but since last week it’s been 80 percent lower,” said Ferdi Tanoni of the West Timor Care Foundation, which supports poor fishermen in eastern Indonesia.

“Before this incident, they were able to catch about 100 red snapper a night. But now it’s extremely difficult to even get 20 fish.”
The PTTEP Australasia-operated rig caught fire Sunday during an attempt to stop the leak, engulfing the deck and well-head platform some 250 kilometers off the Australian coast.

Environmental group WWF has said the spill is “one of Australia’s biggest environmental disasters”.

It says more than 400,000 liters of oil have been spilt, generating a slick spanning 10,000-25,000 square kilometers that threatens animals including dolphins and sea turtles.

Agence France Presse

Australia: No Oil From Burning Rig Reached Indonesia
Jakarta Globe 2 Nov 09;

The Australian Embassy in Indonesia on Monday said it was “highly unlikely that any Montara oil would have come close to Indonesian coastal waters.”

“Oil has a unique fingerprint, so it is relatively easy to verify whether or not the oil found in East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) was from the Montara spill,” the embassy said in a press release.

The statement was issued in response to reports that the leaking oil rig was affecting Indonesia’s marine environment. The Montara oil well, which is operated by Thailand’s PTT Exploration and Production Australasia, is located about 250 kilometers off the north coast of Western Australia.

A spokeswoman for the company on Sunday said specialists had succeeded in the first stage of plugging the well, which has been spilling at least 400 barrels of oil each day into the ocean since Aug. 21, creating an oil slick that covers an area estimated to be at least 6,000 square kilometers.

But before the leak could actually be stopped, a fire broke out, she said.

The World Wildlife Fund has said the slick has already drifted hundreds of kilometers toward East Nusa Tenggara.

The WWF has called the spill “one of Australia’s biggest environmental disasters,” one that threatens marine animals, including dolphins and sea turtles.

Last week, the regional environmental management agency in East Nusa Tenggara said water samples taken on Oct. 10 tested positive for oil suspected to have come from the Montara oil field.

Local officials and environmental groups have also said that fishermen from Rote and Kupang districts in the province had discovered hundreds of dead fish in Indonesian waters, and that residents in villages on small islands off the coast of West Timor were suffering skin problems and acute diarrhea after eating contaminated fish.

The Australian Embassy, in its release, said it was aware of these reports, but said: “Australia has undertaken toxicity tests on fish collected in the vicinity of the oil spill in Australian waters, and results showed no oil contamination. The type and amount of oil observed in Indonesia’s [Exclusive Economic Zone] is considered to pose no significant threat to the marine environment.”

It added that it would conduct further tests.

The Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs earlier said that the government would send a letter to Canberra about the situation.

But when contacted by the Jakarta Globe on Monday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Teuku Faizasyah said the government was still verifying the facts and a national team would be assembled to investigate the case.

The Australian Embassy, however, said in its release that the Australian government had been coordinating with Indonesia.

“Indonesian officials visited Darwin from 30 September to 2 October to observe first-hand Australia’s comprehensive response to the Montara wellhead oil and gas leak. These officials also undertook an overflight of the area,” it said.

It added that discussions were ongoing with Indonesia about a possible visit by a team of Australian officials and company representatives to Jakarta in early November.

The embassy also said the Australian government was focused on limiting the effects of the oil spill on the environment.

“A major clean-up exercise is occurring applying dispersants and conducting containment and recovery operations using booms and skimmers,” it said.

JG, AFP

Burning Oil Rig May Collapse
Jakarta Globe 2 Nov 09;

Sydney. An oil rig leaking into the Timor Sea and engulfed in a massive blaze is at risk of total collapse, the rig operator acknowledged Monday, as government officials frustrated by failure to plug the leak promised an investigation.
Officials with rig operator PTTEP Australasia were planning to pump more heavy mud into a leaking well casing on Tuesday in the hopes of removing the source of fuel from the fire, which broke out on the West Atlas rig and Montara wellhead platform on Sunday.

The blaze started when workers were pouring mud into a hole that has been leaking an estimated 400 barrels of oil a day since Aug. 21. The company says it does not know what sparked the blaze.

"The fire is out of control," PTTEP Australasia chief financial officer Jose Martins told reporters in Perth on Monday.

A portion of the rig has already collapsed onto the wellhead platform, and there is a "large risk" the West Atlas rig could collapse into the sea, Martins said.

Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson said Monday that once the spill is contained he would launch an official inquiry.

"Our requirement is to assess the cause of the accident and any lessons to be learnt, and that could lead to a change in the regulatory environment," he told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Ferguson later told reporters in Melbourne that if PTTEP was "found to have been at fault with respect to any of their responsibilities, then any potential action will be appropriately considered at the time."

On Monday, the company said it was mixing 4,000 barrels of heavy mud to pour down the well on Tuesday morning.

The oil slick from the rig, about 150 miles (250 kilometers) off Australia's northwest coast, now stretches across thousands of miles (kilometers) of remote ocean. Indonesia said last week that thousands of dead fish and clumps of oil have been found drifting near its coastline.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Monday he was "deeply disturbed" at the latest turn of events on the rig, signaling the government's rising frustration that fixing the spill is taking so long.

"Do I think this is acceptable? No, I don't," Rudd told Fairfax Radio Network. "Are we angry with this company? Yes we are. Are we trying to do everything we can to get this under control? You betcha."

AP

Australian oil rig will burn until leak capped
Channel NewsAsia 2 Nov 09;

SYDNEY: A massive oil rig fire burning out of control off Australia's northwest coast cannot be stopped until a well that has been leaking for 10 weeks is capped, officials warned Monday.

The West Atlas rig caught fire Sunday during the latest attempt to stop the leak, which has dumped thousands of barrels of oil into the Timor Sea since August 21.

Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson said the rig's Thai-based operators PTTEP Australasia would make another attempt Monday to stop the spill by filling the well with heavy mud.

"Therefore removing the source of gas which is fuelling the fire," he said.

PTTEP said stopping the leak was the only way to extinguish the blaze engulfing the deck and well-head platform some 250 kilometres (155 miles) off the coast.

"The measures which we have been able to take so far can only mitigate the fire, they will not stop the fire," the company's chief financial officer Jose Martins said.

"The best way to stop the fire is to complete the well-kill and stop the flow of oil and gas at the surface of the H1 well, cutting off the fuel source for the fire."

Ferguson said the accident, the first major incident in the past 25 years of offshore drilling, had "clearly had an impact on the standing of the oil and gas industry in Australia".

"And I simply say that once the well is filled, the platform is made safe, I will conduct a full and independent enquiry to actually assess the cause of the incident and the manner in which it has been handled over the last 10 weeks," he said.

Environmental groups have criticised the government's handling of the spill, saying it is threatening bird and marine life off Western Australia's resource-rich northern coast.

PTTEP said the company was focusing on the safety of its staff, bringing the fire under control and plugging the leak.

"Presently there are many unanswered questions, including what caused the fire," Martins told reporters in Perth on Sunday.

- AFP/yb


Read more!

South Sumatra`s mangrove forests in critical conditions :official

Antara 2 Nov 09;

Palembang, S Sumatra (ANTARA News) - Mangrove forests in South Sumatra are in critical conditions due to the conversion of coastal areas into shrimp and fish farms by local residents, a provincial maritime official said.

To stop a further deterioration of the mangrove forests, the South Sumatra marine resources and fisheries office was planning to plant 125,000 mangrove seedlings along the coasts of Musibanyuasin and Ogan Komering Hilir districts, the office`s head, Lukman Nur Hakim, said here on Monday.

A small team consisting local residents would later be formed to continuously watch over the newly planted mangrove seedlings, he said.

But Lukman admitted the 125,000 mangrove seedlings would not be enough to restore the degraded mangrove forests to their original conditions. Therefore, his office was also planning to do the mangrove replanting along South Sumatra province`s coasts every year and thus gradually increase the number of new mangrove trees.

Lukman said mangroves played an important role in preserving the existence of marine biota and preventing soil abrasion. Mangroves could also help clean the air and reduce the effects of global warming.

In order to maintain the marine environment, Lukman added, his office was continuously monitoring the existence of coral reefs along coastal areas in Musibanyuasin and Ogan Komering Hilir districts.

Five spots in the two districts had also been designated as places to cultivate new coral reefs, Lukman said.

According to the official NACA (an inter-governmental organisation promoting rural development through sustainable aquaculture) website www.enaca.org, close to half of mangrove coverage occurs in five countries, i.e. Indonesia, Australia, Brazil, Nigeria and Mexico with the largest mangrove area in Southeast Asia located in Indonesia.

In general, the mangroves of Southeast Asia were the best developed and most diverse in terms of plants and animals. Fifty two out of the 268 plant species that have been recorded from these mangrove areas are true mangrove species or those that are found only in mangrove habitats while the others are mangrove associated species that are also encountered in non-mangrove habitats.

Eighteen species of mangrove plants are endemic to the south east Asian region and eight out of them are true mangroves.

Current member of NACA are Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, South Korea, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam. (*)


Read more!