Best of our wild blogs: 5 Jul 09


Chek Jawa Boardwalk Tour Double Bonanza – 18 and 26 July 2009
from Adventures with the Naked Hermit Crabs

10 Jul (Fri): Talk on "The Wonders of Singapore's Mangroves Insect Fauna" from wild shores of singapore

Life History of the Colonel
from Butterflies of Singapore

Exploring Noordin, Pulau Ubin
from wild shores of singapore

Life in a man-made bay on Lazarus Island
from Half a Bunny and the Salmon of Doubt and Rock and reflexology on Lazarus Island

Blue-Throated Bee-Eaters: Courtship and mating
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Tracking whimbrels to breeding grounds near Hudson Bay
from Bird Ecology Study Group

SQUASHED! What happens when a snake tries to cross a road
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Psst! Here's the secret of where to get durians in S'pore -- FREE
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

At Alexandra Village foodcourt, you get extra ingredient of bird droppings in your kway teow from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Monday Morgue: 29th June 2009
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales

Writing to excite ordinary people about mangroves
from wild shores of singapore


Read more!

Take pride in Singapore's rich natural heritage

Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

I refer to the article, 'Let's have a natural history museum' (June14).

Singapore may be a small city state, but it is home to a rich diversity of flora and fauna, which unfortunately, most Singaporeans are unaware of.

Therefore, a natural history museum plays an important role in raising public awareness of our biodiversity and facilitating national efforts in natural conservation, especially when climate change is forcing millions of species to the brink of extinction.

To further ignite public interest in our natural heritage, public campaigns can be held and exhibitions can showcase selected specimens collected by the National University of Singapore's Faculty of Science.

Our multicultural heritage has been the pride of Singaporeans. We should take equal pride in our rich natural heritage.

Chan Cheng Lin


Read more!

House owner fined $6,000 for cutting down 3 trees

Jamie Ee Wen Wei, Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

When Mr Foo Suan Pin got a contractor to chop down three fruit trees in his garden in the Holland Road area in September 2007, it did not occur to him that he was committing a crime.

But in February this year, he was slapped with a $6,000 fine after he submitted a plan to the authorities for approval of construction works to his house.

The reason? He had removed trees in a tree conservation area.

'I decided to cut the trees because they looked sickly and were infested with red ants, and the leaves were clogging up the gutters,' Mr Foo, 52, told The Sunday Times.

'Before this, I had not even heard of a tree conservation area. I thought I could remove the trees because they were in my own private property.'

Under the Parks and Trees Act, you can't fell any tree with a girth exceeding 1m growing on any land within a designated tree conservation area, or on any vacant land, except with the approval of the National Parks Board (NParks).

There are two designated tree conservation areas in Singapore. One covers the Tanglin-Bukit

Timah-Pasir Panjang area and the other is in Changi. They were chosen because of the large number of clusters of mature trees and wooded areas there.

Offenders pay a composition fine of $2,000 to NParks but can also be fined up to $50,000 if charged in court.

Singapore also has what are known as heritage trees - mature trees within and outside the tree conservation areas - that are protected by law. These trees are noted for their historical value and contribution to Singapore's landscape.

In Mr Foo's case, the authorities stepped in after they found that a land survey report of the property done in April 2007 had mentioned the trees, whereas Mr Foo's new plan did not.

He is apparently not the only one who is clueless about the scheme.

The Sunday Times interviewed 12 residents of the two areas and all said they did not know that trees there were protected.

Housewife Lily Lean, 63, who lives in a semi-detached house off Farrer Road, said: 'I had no idea that my house was in a tree conservation area, but I've never thought about cutting down my tree.'

She has an olive tree that is six years old and more than 1m in girth.

She is all for the law.

'It takes years for a tree to grow, but only minutes to cut it down. I think Singaporeans need to learn that trees have life-giving qualities,' she said.

NParks said there have been 40 trees felled without approval since 2005.

A total of 37 people have been issued with a composition fine of $2,000 for each tree felled. Seven of them removed more than one tree.

Last month, a property owner and contractor landed in court and were fined $25,000 each for cutting a 21m-tall tembusu tree in the Bishopsgate area in Tanglin. This happened in February.

It was the first case to be taken to court since 2003.

NParks decided on this course of action because the owner had blatantly disregarded its notice to retain the tree, it said.

An NParks officer examined the tree in November last year and found it to be stable and healthy.

Although instructions were given to the owner to retain the tree, he told the contractor to cut it down.

In Mr Foo's case, he said he was misled by his contractor, who was recommended to his mother by NParks when a tree fell in her property. The contractor had said it was okay to chop it.

'If he did not know the regulations, then how was I expected to know?'

The two mango trees and one rambutan tree had girths of between 1.2m and 2.8m.

Mr Foo said they were already there when he bought the house.

The Sunday Times understands that the contractor was also fined.

Mr Foo sought help from Holland-Bukit Timah MP Christopher De Souza, who wrote a letter of appeal on his behalf.

'I lost my job as an IT consultant in May last year. I was hoping the fine would be lowered. I even offered to plant three fruit trees back to replace those that were felled,' he said. He is still unemployed and looking for a job.

In the end, he decided to pay the fine to avoid going to court.

While the chapter is now closed, what bugs him is that no one had informed him of the legislation when he bought the property in 2007.

'I think the Government should do more than enforce the law. They should have more public education on this,' he said.

'If they knew I had bought a property in a tree conservation area, they could have sent me a notice to remind me not to remove trees within the property.'

In response, Mr Simon Longman, director of streetscape from NParks, said that land owners or developers are required to engage a registered architect or engineer in any development project, and they would be aware of the tree conservation provisions in the Parks and Trees Act.

He said that the tree conservation areas have also been widely publicised, in particular in 2003 when property developer DTZ Debenham Tie Leung felled a 150-year-old Hopea Sangal tree without permission.

Information on the areas is also available on government websites.

Dr Shawn Lum, president of the Nature Society, said that while one could always argue that more can be done to increase awareness about policies, it is also up to the individual to know what is happening in the community.

'If people just don't pay attention or are apathetic, then no amount of education can help.'

Meanwhile, Mr Foo is looking forward to moving into his $2.5 million Holland Road home at the end of this month.

Despite being poorer by $6,000 because of the trees, he intends to plant some in his garden. He is considering jackfruit or palm trees.

'As long as you keep them in good condition, they won't be a problem,' he said.

Additional reporting by Lisabel Ting

Before you chop down a tree...
Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

1 Do I need to seek NParks' approval if I want to remove a tree in my garden?

Approval from the National Parks Board (NParks) is needed only if the tree is within one of the two tree conservation areas, or has been deemed a heritage tree. You can call NParks' helpline on 1800-4717300. If necessary, officers will pay you a visit to inspect the trees.

2 Do private developers need to seek NParks' approval to remove trees if they wish to develop a plot of land?

Only if the land is within a tree conservation area or has heritage trees.

Private developers must engage a registered architect or professional engineer to submit their proposed layout plans to NParks. These would include the number of trees, tree species, girth and height. The trees to be removed are required to be marked on the plans for NParks' approval.

3 Does NParks conduct tree pruning or tree removal services for private homes?

No. Residents can get an arborist to do this. A list of aborists certified by the International Society of Arboriculture can be found at http://www.cuge.com.sg/Listing-of-Certified-Arborists

SOURCE: NPARKS

Remind home owners of rule banning tree felling
Straits Times Forum 6 Jul 09;

I REFER to yesterday's report, 'House owner fined $6,000 for cutting down 3 trees'. If trees are diseased and are of a common species, such as mango or rambutan, it is unjust to fine a home owner for felling them, especially as his contractor had reassured him that it was okay to do so.

The National Parks Board should be more sympathetic to the home owner's case.

The authorities should remind home owners of the rule prohibiting tree felling, when property transactions involving designated tree conservation areas take place.

Patrick Low

Felling trees: Where's the rationale?
Straits Times Forum 9 Jul 09;

I REFER to the National Parks Board (NParks) Forum Online reply last Thursday, 'Felling of trees in conservation area is an offence, even on one's own property'. The last large cluster of trees above Orchard MRT station and in the open carpark beside Somerset MRT station have been felled and shopping centres and offices are taking their place.

A contradiction is the stiff $6,000 fine NParks slapped on Mr Foo Suan Pin in February when he felled trees in his garden two years ago, not realising it was illegal as his property was within a tree conservation zone ('House owner fined $6,000 for cutting down 3 trees', Sunday).

On the other hand, at least two huge trees still stand smack in the centre of the pavement on Mount Elizabeth Road outside York Hotel, forcing pedestrians to step onto the road to bypass them. The stretch of pavement, like the rest along this road, had the two ends modified to allow access to wheelchair-bound individuals, who now have to be helped onto the road and back up again.

I questioned the wisdom of planting them in the middle of a narrow pavement and the then Public Works Department (PWD) replied that the trees would provide shade when fully grown. I also pointed out that the width of the pavement was not quite the 'five-foot way', as I referred to the pavement. If only the PWD had the same foresight then.

Perhaps the penalty for felling a tree or two in one's garden should not be so draconian, especially when the guilty ones are genuinely unaware they are within a tree conservation area.

Denis Distant

Trees felled only as a last resort
Straits Times Forum 14 Jul 09;

I REFER to last Thursday's letter, 'Felling trees, where's the rationale?', and thank Mr Denis Distant for his feedback.

Tree conservation is not an easy task in highly urbanised and land-scarce Singapore. When deciding whether to grant approval to fell trees, the National Parks Board (NParks) has to balance between the need for development and conserving old trees. Where approvals are granted, it is after we have given the matter due consideration and exhausted every means to find solutions to retain the trees.

The fact that Orchard Road continues to be lined with mature trees is the result of this painstaking process to look for alternatives with developers to retain trees.

The alternative would be a free-for-all situation where trees can be felled without any rule, regulation or enforcement. For Singapore to keep its Garden City ambience, this is obviously a non-starter. Conservation of trees requires commitment and understanding from everyone.

Simon Longman
Director, Streetscape
National Parks Board


Read more!

Spare Yishun's natural beauty

Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

I refer to last Sunday's article, 'Yishun town centre to get new look'.

I live a few minutes' walk from Yishun Pond and walk around it six days a week on my way to and from Yishun Park.

Since the building of the Khoo Teck Puat Hospital began, huge efforts have been made to keep the pond free of the debris washed down the drains which feed it. There have been a large number of trees and flowering shrubs planted on the banks and, generally, the area is kept rubbish-free.

However, I note with sadness that the wild flowers and grass which grow along the banks are frequently cleared, leaving the rocks exposed and ugly.

It also leaves exposed the herons which have made the area their home, when they feed at the water's edge each day. There are also kingfishers nesting nearby which swoop over the pond looking for a meal, sometimes joined by fishing eagles. They nest in Yishun Park. All this natural beauty, it seems, will give way to man-made aesthetics, probably at the expense of the wild life.

Why can't there be benches placed along the banks instead, so that people can relax, enjoy the peace and serenity, and watch the turtles rise to the surface for air?

Why is a lookout tower needed to view the 'panorama' of concrete buildings?

There was a debate about the positioning of the subsidised ward next to the pond, and the reason given was that the patients could benefit from the cool breeze and the view of nearby Yishun Park.

That will be restricted by the proposed tower.

Angela V. Banerjee (Ms)


Read more!

Sterilisation a humane, effective solution to stray cat issue

Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

I refer to recent letters on the stray cat issue.

Stray cats that are sterilised are usually looked after and fed by caregivers in the neighbourhoods who have taken on this role in an effort to reduce the stray cat births.

The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) started its stray sterilisation voucher scheme in 1991 on a monthly basis, enabling members of the public who ballot successfully for a voucher to take a stray cat they are caring for to a participating veterinary clinic on our list, with SPCA absorbing the cost.

Last year, the SPCA distributed 2,141 vouchers.

Sterilisation, we believe, is a far more humane and effective method to reduce the stray cat population.

With the long-standing rule of cats not permitted to be kept as licensed pets in HDB flats, the problem escalated in past decades because of uncontrolled breeding of the many homeless strays, and owners who kept cats but allowed them to breed or stray, while not being held accountable.

Decades of collecting and culling of cats by the authorities proved to be ineffective because this method did not address the root cause of the problem - uncontrolled breeding of the cats remaining on the streets.

Over the past 18 years, though, with more organisations and members of the community getting involved, sterilisation has become a widely practised alternative to the burgeoning population increase that was evident previously.

The most promising sign that sterilisation does, in fact, work, is that the number of cats taken in by the society in recent years has been steadily decreasing.

In May, we reached an all-time low of 260, compared to over 500 per month when it was at its peak some years ago.

This is also taking into consideration the ceasing of the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority's (AVA) Stray Cat Rehabilitation Scheme in 2003 during the Sars period.

The SPCA would like to urge town councils and the AVA to consider bringing back this excellent programme, which would help reduce the number of stray cats at a faster pace.

As long as the HDB rule on the prohibition of cats remains, the sterilisation of strays needs to be to looked upon as the only effective long-term solution in reducing the stray cat population.

Deirdre Moss (Ms)
Executive Officer
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Sterilised cats generally cause less trouble
Straits Times Forum 6 Jul 09;

I REFER to last Thursday's letter by Mr Ernest Chua, 'The constant noises they created, the mess from droppings and wanton breeding made life hell for us'.

The Cat Welfare Society agrees with Mr Chua that responsible feeding and sterilisation of community cats are crucial to the harmonious coexistence of cats, caregivers and residents. That is why we advocate the trap-neuter-release-manage (TNRM) method, in which community cats are captured, sterilised and then returned to the community, where caregivers can continue to feed and care for them, as well as manage any issues arising from their presence.

Sterilised cats generally do not caterwaul, tomcats will stop spraying urine to mark their territory, and 'wanton breeding' will be prevented.

All caregivers are also encouraged to feed responsibly at ground level and clear up after the cats have eaten. This should prevent any problems arising from leftover food. Residents who face the same issues that Mr Chua once faced can try using cat repellents such as crushed mothballs and Cat Stop to repel cats from entering private premises.

Mr Chua also mentioned that the cat trap provided by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority 'proved ineffective'. It is actually easier for caregivers to do the trapping as they may understand cat behaviour better. Community cats also recognise familiar faces and are more likely to approach the caregivers. That is why caregivers play an important role for the TNRM method to be effective.

Ang Li Tin
President
Cat Welfare Society

Exasperated resident says
'The constant noises they created, the mess from droppings and wanton breeding made life hell for us.'
Straits Times Forum 6 Jul 09;

MR ERNEST CHUA: 'The culprits behind the act of animal cruelty in Tuesday's report ('Coma-inducing drug found in planted food') were certainly wrong. They not only endangered other animals like dogs and birds, but also created danger for children in the condominium. Be that as it may, we should also consider the problem created by stray cats or irresponsible pet owners. I lived in a house where we were tormented by stray cats at all times of the day and night. The constant noises they created, the mess from their droppings and their wanton breeding made life hell for us. When I complained to the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority, it said it could not help much as I lived in a private estate. It provided me with a cat cage that proved ineffective and we finally moved to a high-floor apartment. I urge the authorities to educate cat lovers to feed cats responsibly and sterilise all cats they feed.'

Free loan of pet traps does not solve problem of strays
Straits Times Forum 8 Jul 09;

THANK YOU, Mr Ernest Chua ('Pet point: Exasperated resident says', July 2) for your suggestion that cats be sterilised and fed responsibly, which are the two pillars for effective stray management.

Your case fully highlights that the free loaning of traps by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) to residents to resolve cat and other animal problems does not work. Removing the cats does not resolve the problem at the root, which is breeding, and more cats will eventually come back to the area. Amateur cat trapping also puts both humans and animals at risk of getting hurt if not done properly.

A final point I would like to make is that placing a trap in the hands of people who do not have a love for cats may result in inhumane treatment of trapped animals.

As the AVA only collects trapped animals during working hours, how are they ensuring that the animals are properly treated until collection, especially over weekends? There is also nothing preventing trappers from disposing animals on their own accord in other estates or even in more unimaginable means.

I would like to appeal to the AVA to work with caregivers to manage and sterilise stray cats in private estates. The AVA can also think about implementing the stray cat sterilisation programme in non-HDB estates to expedite the control of the stray cat population in these estates.

Lau Vun Ping


Read more!

Angling for a catch: fishing in our canals

Canals running through neighbourhod estates can yield a surprising harvest for anglers
Yusuf Abdol Hamid, Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

When security officer Andre Lim wants to eat seafood, he heads for the canal near his Bishan HDB flat, a 10-minute stroll away.

Armed with a rod, hook and line, he usually does not have to wait more than 15 minutes before he reels in something suitable for dinner.

He has caught varieties such as tilapia, haruan and catfish.

'Once I caught two eels, which my wife made into a tasty Japanese-style dinner,' he says. The 49-year-old has been fishing since he was five.

Amateur fishermen like Mr Lim are finding that canals in neighbourhoods such as Pasir Ris, Clementi, Jurong, Kallang and Rochor can yield a rich harvest of fish. The canals are located near HDB and residential estates.

A spokesman for the Public Utilities Board, whose responsibilties include the water that runs through canals and drains, advises the public against entering the canals as they are prone to sudden rapid flows and rising water levels during heavy and intense rain.

Many of the city fishermen can be found on fishingkaki.com, a local website which boasts a membership of almost 30,000. It was launched in 2004.

On the site, they post pictures of themselves with their catch, some of which are bigger than their torsos. Here, anglers also share the best fishing locations.

One of them, Mr Terry Wang, 23, and his 50-year-old father have been fishing in the canal opposite Jurong Primary School for the last 10 years.

The ST Logistics officer says: 'It requires a lot of patience to fish. I do it mostly to accompany my father and to relax.'

His most impressive catch was a 6kg snakehead, or 'toman' as it is more commanly known here.

Unlike Mr Lim, Mr Wang does not eat the fish he catches. He releases them back into the canal. 'This preserves the fish population and allows them to grow.'

Mr Roy Phua and his 14-year-old son also fish for leisure.

The 50-year-old Civil Defence officer, who fishes at a canal in Clementi, says that it is a good way to spend time with his son.

He adds: 'We usually catch nothing. It's really just about enjoying the activity.'

Mr Davy Ong, who owns a fishing tackle shop in Bussorah Street, says he has fished at nearly every drain and canal in Singapore.

The 35-year-old says: 'The most unexpected place was a drain next to Somerset MRT, where I caught a big tilapia. People just stared at me in disbelief.'

But he bemoans the fact that local anglers have fewer fish to catch and fewer places to catch them at.

He estimates that there are about 20 legal fishing spots.

Furthermore, he says, foreign workers trying to catch their meals contribute to the problem of overfishing.

According to him, once the fish population is wiped out at a location, it takes four to five years for the fish to return.

Anglers are also losing fishing spots to urbanisation, as areas get walled off or covered by construction projects.

Mr Ong used to fish at a drain near Teban Gardens, where he says he was able to find some varieties unique to the area.

Shaking his head, he says: 'One day, I went there with my friend and found that the drain has been replaced by a construction site.'

Fishing spots
Sunday Times 5 Jul 09;

Where: Lower Seletar Canal, Nee Soon Road
What you can find: Giant snakehead, peacock bass and featherback


Where: Jurong Canal, junction of Jurong Canal Drive and Jurong East Avenue 1
What you can find: Giant snakehead, carp and tilapia


Where: Sungei Tampines, runs along Pasir Ris Town Park
What you can find: Barramundi, barracuda and garoupa


Where: Rochor Canal, opposite Sim Lim Square, along Rochor Canal Road
What you can find: Tilapia and luohan


Read more!

Wallacea introduces Indonesian biodiversity to Beijing

Tifa Asrianti, The Jakarta Post 5 Jul 09;

The booth of the Wallacea Foundation at Indonesia Week, held at Beijing's Wangfujing Street from June 17-21, may have no ties to government or economic profit, but it was nonetheless the busiest booth of all 30 on show.

Visitors coming to the foundation's booth got flying-frog-shaped fans for writing their names down in the guestbook. They also got a leaflet outlining the foundation's main mission.

"If you hold another exhibition here and need my help, just contact me. I will bring along my parents, my brothers and my girlfriend," Lie, one of the booth's visitors, said excitedly.

He was not the only one leaving the booth in high spirits. According to Grace Anna Marie, the foundation's executive director, the foundation had managed to collect around 2,000 names during the first two days of the exhibition.

"Had we not held the exhibition here in Wangfujing, we would get less people enlisted. We come to where the crowds are, which is a good strategy. Perhaps we can apply it at our next exhibition," she said.

Wangfujing Street is an 810-meter-long car-free area located in the heart of Beijing.

The street has both traditional and modern stores, art galleries and hotels, as well as local cuisine food stalls.

It is estimated 600,000 people pass through this street on weekdays and 1.2 million on weekends or holidays. Its name is often touted alongside Paris's Champs-Elys*es. Indonesia Week was the first such exhibition here.

Appearing at the exhibition was part of the foundation's attempt to educate the wider world about the Wallacea region.

The Wallacea is an imaginary line that separates the Indonesian archipelago into two parts: one on the Asian shelf and one on the Australian continental shelf. The islands of Wallacea lie between Sundaland (the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Borneo, Java and Bali) to the west, and near Oceania, including Australia and New Guinea, to the south and east.

The region got its name from British bio-geographer Alfred Russel Wallace, who conducted intensive field observations between 1854 and 1862. Wallace noted the differences in mammal and bird fauna between the islands on either side of the line. In 1858, Wallace inspired Charles Darwin's natural selection theory, after he sent Darwin a letter detailing his findings in Ternate, in Maluku.

The letter, attached to his essay "On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type", outlined the mechanics of the evolutionary divergence of certain species due to environmental factors. While Darwin achieved fame as "the father of evolution", Wallace has remained largely unknown.

Grace said her foundation had sought to hold a similar event in the UK, Wallace's home country. However, it was the Indonesian Embassy in China that was ready to hold the event, and therefore they decided to hold the maiden campaign in Beijing.

Besides the exhibition, the foundation also met with several stakeholders in Beijing, such as experts and practitioners at Beijing University for Chinese Medicine (BUCM), China Wildlife Conservation Association (CWCA) and Chinese state-owned oil company, China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC).

Sangkot Marzuki, the foundation's chairman, said that during the meeting with BUCM, BUCM professors explained the importance of Chinese medicine, while TWF told them about the possibility of new medical plants in the Wallacea region.

"Chinese medicine is very developed here. They have explored their natural resources to make medicine and now they want to search for other natural resources. They are very interested in Papua's red fruit," Sangkot said.

He said the meeting was a preliminary discussion prior to the research cooperation that might exist in the future. He said both BUCM and TWF had agreed to establish professor-to-professor cooperation.

The foundation's meeting with CWCA resulted in an agreement on expert exchange.

Sangkot said TWF would hold a journey in October to retrace Wallace's experiences in the Wallacea region.

"To commemorate the 150th anniversary of Wallace's studies, we will hold journey to retrace his experiences. It will be attended by youths from across Southeast Asia. We will also invite CWCA," he said.

Established in 1983, CWCA is a nonprofit national organization under the framework of China Science Association. To date, CWCA has 31 provincial and 622 regional branches throughout China, with more than 200,000 members.

Its main objective is to carry out educational and scientific activities, promote academic communication and cooperation nationally and globally, and conduct relevant international wildlife conservation projects.

Li Qingwen, deputy secretary-general of CWCA, said his institution had taken educational propaganda as its central work to build up the public's concern about wildlife.

CWCA has held Bird-Loving Week and Wildlife Propaganda Month each year, to popularize wildlife conservation knowledge among millions of people through posters, video shows and brochures. The association also holds contests and organizes bird-watching activities.

To tackle the Chinese traditions of eating wild animals, CWCA launched a survey on the subject at the end of 1999. It later suggested the public not eat wild animals, and set a new dietary paradigm.

The attempts included a call on cooks. As a result, many cooks tried to be Green Cuisine Ambassadors, refusing to cook wild animals anymore. CWCA has successfully collected signatures from more than 300,000 cooks as of 2007.

Sangkot said TWF could learn many things from CWCA's experiences.

"CWCA started their campaign by picking the endangered giant panda as their mascot. They held photo exhibitions about the life of the panda. Therefore people felt a bond with the endangered species. TWF can do the same with, for instance, the nocturnal dry-nosed tarsier," he said.

"CWCA also always involves youths in their campaigns. They have two kinds of members - individuals and community groups. We also have such membership in TWF, and we will continue."

The meeting with CNOOC discussed the company's corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs. Sangkot said the meeting was aimed at encouraging the company to include environmental conservation in its CSR programs, as it is one of the largest offshore oil companies operating in Indonesia.

CNOOC operates in the Java Sea, just 90 kilometers from Jakarta Bay. The company has so far held several CSR programs, such as giving scholarships to needy students and providing clean water wells.

Xiao Zongwei, CNOOC corporate secretary and investor relation general manager, said that before carrying out CSR programs, his company usually sought to find what local people wanted. He also assured TWF that health, safety and the environment were the company's main objectives.

Sangkot said that while CNOOC had yet to operate in the Wallacea region, it was important to seek the company's commitment on environmental conservation.

The exhibition in Beijing may be a baby step for the foundation, but it can be a giant step toward conserving the Wallacea biodiversity.


Read more!

Legal adviser refiles lawsuit against Vietnam PM in mines row

Yahoo News 4 Jul 09;

HANOI (AFP) – A Vietnamese legal adviser said Saturday he had filed a new lawsuit against his country's prime minister for violating environmental laws with a controversial bauxite mining plan.

Cu Huy Ha Vu first filed legal action against the communist leader Nguyen Tan Dung on June 11 but a Hanoi court rejected it, saying it had no legal basis.

However, Vu, who is trying to overturn a 2007 decision by the prime minister to allow the giant mining project, has decided to take his complaint to the Supreme People's Court.

He told AFP he filed the new lawsuit Friday and that he had reinforced it with a reference to an article in the Vietnamese constitution on protecting the environment.

In a one-party state where public protest is rare, scientists, intellectuals and former soldiers have combined with fierce critics of the regime to denounce the government's plans for the mining operations, to be run by a state-owned company in Vietnam's Central Highlands.

Critics say the mine's environmental and social damage would far outweigh any economic benefit, and have pointed to security concerns because a Chinese company has been granted a contract to build one of the projects.

The scheme's most prominent opponent is General Vo Nguyen Giap, 97, who led Vietnam's victory over French colonial forces.

In open letters to the government, the general has warned of the danger to the environment, to the lives of ethnic minorities, and to Vietnam's "security and defence."

The Vietnam lawyers' association has said that, contrary to media reports, Vu is not officially a lawyer.

Vu, who holds a doctorate in law, has acknowledged that he cannot register as a lawyer because he is a civil servant.

He has said the association's move is aimed at "tarnishing" his image and blocking his lawsuit and that he has the training required in Vietnam to be a lawyer and that the law allowed him, even without a licence, to file a civil suit.

Vu said he is also allowed to defend people in civil suits, as he has done in the past.


Read more!

Costa Rica tops happiness, 'green living' poll

Yahoo News 4 Jul 09;

SAN JOSE (AFP) – Costa Rica is the happiest place on earth, and one of the most environmentally friendly, according to a new survey by a British non-governmental group.

The New Economics Foundation looked at 143 countries that are home to 99 percent of the world's population and devised an equation that weighed life expectancy and people's happiness against their environmental impact.

By that formula, Costa Rica is the happiest, greenest country in the world, just ahead of the Dominican Republic.

Latin American countries did well in the survey, occupying nine of the top 10 spots.

Australia scored third place, but other major Western nations did poorly, with Britain coming in at 74th place and the United States at 114th.

The New Economics Foundation's measurements found Costa Ricans have a life expectancy of 78.5 years, and 85 percent of the country's residents say they are happy and satisfied with their lives.

Those figures, taken along with the fact that Costa Rica has a small "ecological footprint," combined to push the small nation to the top of the list.

A 2006 New Economics Foundation study designated Vanuatu the world's happiest nation, with Costa Rica at second place.

Sociologist Andrea Fonseca said Costa Rica gives its citizens the "tools" to be happy, but cautioned that happiness cannot be calculated just by looking at life expectancy and environmental practices.

She added that the country's rise to the top of the Happy Planet Index "has a lot to do with social imagination."

Costa Rica has a peaceful reputation because it does not have an army, and is also known for its protected ecological zones and national slogan "pure life," she said.


Read more!

What’s Beyond Those Bargains?

Devin Leonard, The New York Times 4 Jul 09;

MOST people I know love Ikea. Many of us have bought furniture from Ikea stores, and even if it falls apart we keep going back. Say what you will about Ikea, its stuff is always stylish. And so inexpensive!

But in “Cheap: The High Cost of Discount Culture” (Penguin), Ellen Ruppel Shell argues that Ikea has engaged in many questionable business practices to maintain its low prices. She says it buys much of its wood in Eastern Europe and far eastern Russia, “where wages are low, large wooded regions remote, and according to the World Bank, half of all logging is illegal.” The author writes that such deforesting contributes to global warming, threatening the planet. That is a steep price to pay for cheap bookshelves, she says.

This is an inflammatory accusation. But “Cheap” is a jeremiad. Ms. Ruppel Shell, a contributing editor for The Atlantic Monthly and a journalism professor at Boston University, is disgusted with retailers who she says have abandoned their principles in pursuit of rock-bottom prices. And she is angry with the rest of us for supporting them.

Ms. Ruppel Shell argues that our national obsession with bargains has lowered our standard of living and hurt the environment and the quality of American products.

“Cheap” has plenty of targets, and many are usual ones. Ms. Ruppel Shell lambastes Wal-Mart, saying it underpays its workers and enables other retailers to do the same. She criticizes China as tolerating sweatshops with dangerous working conditions. And if you have a weak stomach, you may not get past the chapter entitled “Cheap Eats.” The author goes into wrenching detail about the foul and environmentally noxious conditions at some of the world’s largest factory farms, suppliers to the fast-food industry.

She castigates Red Lobster, saying it patronizes Thailand’s shrimp farms. The Thai shrimp industry has been accused of environmental, child labor and human rights abuses; it attracts migrant workers from Vietnam and Cambodia who labor for next to nothing, Ms. Ruppel Smith writes.

She also writes that Thai shrimp farmers have clear-cut the country’s coastal mangrove forests — a protective wall between land and sea — to make way for more breeding grounds. She cites a United Nations report that says their disappearance exacerbated the effects of the Southern Asian tsunami in 2004 that killed more than 5,300 people in Thailand alone. In other words, many have paid a terrible price so Americans can feast on cheap crustaceans.

(In an interview, a Red Lobster spokesman said the company monitors its Thai suppliers and doesn’t buy shrimp from the ones engaged in the kind of practices that “Cheap” highlights.)

But most of all, Ms. Ruppel Shell indicts all of us for supporting these discounters — particularly those of us who consider ourselves politically and socially aware.

“We rail against exploitation of low-paid workers in Asia” but still drive long distances to save a little money on tube socks, she writes. “We fume over the mistreatment of animals by agribusiness but freak out at an uptick in food prices. We lecture our kids on social responsibility and then buy them toys assembled by destitute child workers on some far-flung foreign shore.”

“Cheap” isn’t perfect. Ms. Ruppel Shell makes some glaring errors. She refers to the convicted fraudster Bernard Madoff as “Michael Madoff” (who she says has contributed to consumer cynicism) and at one point refers to the former Wal-Mart C.E.O. Lee Scott as “Lee Jones.”

She is a bit too eager to spread blame. The author chronicles her visit to Ikea headquarters with way too much snark. She is unimpressed when Ikea’s chief, Anders Dahlvig, describes the steps his company is taking — among them employing 11 monitors led by a woman whom the author herself describes as “deeply knowledgeable” — to avoid doing business with illegal foresters. She still doesn’t think that Ikea is doing enough; then again, she doesn’t offer any original reporting that suggests the company is doing anything wrong.

And she is too quick to paint the men she describes as the founders of today’s discount culture as black-hearted. She infers that Sylvan Goldman, owner of the Humpty Dumpty supermarket company, introduced the shopping cart in 1937 to fool his consumers into buying more goods. But how many of us can stand in the checkout line with a week’s worth of groceries in our arms? Mr. Goldman deserves gratitude, not scorn, for his consumer-friendly innovation.

Still, it’s hard to argue with Ms. Ruppel Shell’s overriding thesis and her grudging conclusion that it won’t be easy to reverse the ravages of discount culture against which she rails.

She concedes that America can’t seal off its borders to keep out low-cost Thai shrimp and Swedish bookshelves. “Tariffs to keep out foreign-made goods may offer a short-term fix,” she writes, “but over the long term United States would be poorer and weaker were we to snub international markets.”

In the end, she calls for a consumer revolution. She says that we must spend in a way that is consistent with our principles.

That won’t be easy in a recession. Before he retired last year, Mr. Scott predicted that his company would thrive during a downturn. “In my mind there is no doubt that this is Wal-Mart time,” he told a group of analysts.

But what if the crisis does cause people to rethink their spending habits? They might if they read “Cheap.” Maybe Ms. Ruppel Shell’s disgust will be contagious.


Read more!

What lies beneath: Plastics threat to UK beaches

A tide of hidden filth has contributed to a huge decline in coastal areas fit for swimming
Emily Dugan, The Independent 4 Jul 09;

At first glance Porthtowan beach looks like an advert for British Tourism. With white sand and turquoise sea bathed in bright sunshine, it appears to be the best seaside Cornwall has to offer. But just below the surface of this picture-postcard perfection is a darker and, at times, dangerously toxic scene.

Porthtowan is one of many beaches whose hidden filth contributed to the staggering drop in the number of beaches classed as fit for swimming in a recent survey by the Marine Conservation Society. And now campaigners have decided to take matters into their own hands.

Later this month, Surfers Against Sewage (SAS) will launch a grass-roots attempt to improve the state of the nation's beaches. Their beach-cleaning tour, launched to coincide with the start of the summer holidays, will use local volunteers at beaches around the country to collect as much waste as they can in a single day. It is hoped that the tour of England and Wales, which begins in Newquay on 29 July and finishes in Brighton on 3 August, will prompt further marine litter clean-ups around the country.

As the summer holidays approach, the cleanliness of our beaches has never been more important, but as picturesque Porthtowan illustrates, the problems are often hard to see.

This beach is home to more than half of the South-west's sewage-related debris (SRD). In fact, it is largely because of it that the South-west has the highest density of public, fishing and shipping litter, as well as SRD, in England. Despite this, however, Porthtowan continues to hold blue flag status – the hallmark of a supposedly clean and litter-free beach.

A closer inspection of one patch of seaweed along the tide line revealed more than 100 cotton-bud sticks. "This is not a good sign," said SAS campaigns manager Andy Cummins, throwing them into a bin bag. "People often assume our beaches are fine now, because you can't see the problems so easily. Small things like cotton-bud sticks are harder to see, but they're an indication that raw sewage is getting on to the beach, because people flush them down the loo."

Two storm drains, which overflow with sewage after wet weather, run into a river that comes out on the beach. After a rainy period, the spot can be positively toxic.

The latest beach survey by the Marine Conservation Society showed a decline of nearly 17 per cent in the number of beaches fit for swimming – the biggest year-on-year fall in the 22 years the MCS has been producing its annual guide – and the lowest level for seven years. The main problem is seawater contaminated with sewage, which can cause everything from ear, throat, skin and eye infections to gastroenteritis.

But of equal concern to environmentalists is plastics. Microscopic plastic pieces are contaminating our shores: from industrial waste, as well as rubbish dropped by the public.

The worst of these are the raw materials left from injection moulding, dubbed "mermaids' tears". Thousands of these plastic pellets lie hidden in sand on beaches around the UK. They are not picked up in more cosmetic beach inspections, but as with all plastics, they introduce potentially harmful chemicals into the marine food chain – and by extension to humans.

Fishing rope is another offender. In an hour's sweep of Porthtowan beach last week, more than 95 pieces of orange net were uncovered, a third of which were more than half a metre in length. Formerly made of hemp, which biodegrades more quickly, the nets were mended and cared for by fishermen because of the greater expense. Now netting is more commonly made from cheap plastic fibres which, when they break, are often tossed into the sea, where they take hundreds of years to decompose.

Despite the beach having had its daily clean by the council, SAS found 26 crisp and chocolate wrappers, as well as an armful of plastic bottles. All those with labels that can be read will be sent to their companies' headquarters as part of SAS's "return to offender" campaign. Cummins takes a two-litre Coke bottle, puts it in an envelope and takes it to post to Coca-Cola's UK offices in Hammersmith.

"We're aware that it's not the companies themselves that are dropping the litter, but we need to remind them that it's their responsibility to encourage people to dispose of them properly, as well as making them from packaging that breaks down more easily," he explained. "Plastic bottles take 450 years to decompose. Just think about that – it means that if Henry VIII had used plastic bottles at his last wedding party, then they would still be around now."

Return to offender

Surfers Against Sewage sends rubbish back to companies where it originated. Litter, picked up by volunteers and posted back, includes beer cans, sweet wrappers, cartons and bottles. Here are a few of the firms who got some of their own junk back last month: Tesco Stores Ltd; ASDA Stores Ltd; The Coca Cola Company; Innocent Ltd; Walkers Snack Foods Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Lidl UK GmbH; Budweiser Stag Brewing Company Ltd; Cadburys Plc; Unilever Plc; Carlsberg Group; and Bavaria Brouweri NV.


Read more!

Bugs: The Forgotten Victims of Climate Change

Lily Whiteman, livescience.com Yahoo News 4 Jul 09;

This Behind the Scenes article was provided to LiveScience in partnership with the National Science Foundation.

If it were up to Jessica Hellmann, insects such as butterflies and beetles would wield just as much conservation clout as traditional conservation icons, such as polar bears, tigers and dolphins.

Why?

"Animals such as polar bears, tigers and dolphins are tremendously important, but mostly because they help define how we think about our relationship with the natural world," says Hellmann. "But when it comes to the functioning of ecosystems, insects are where it's at."

Why are insects so ecologically important? "They carry diseases, they pollinate and they have economic impacts on crops and timber," says Hellmann, a biologist at the University of Notre Dame. In fact, almost 80 percent of the world's crop plants require pollination, and the annual value of insect pollinated crops in the U.S. is about $20 billion. What's more, most of the living organisms on Earth are insects.

They are also particularly sensitive to climate change - as invertebrates, they can't regulate their own body temperatures - making them "great little thermometers," Hellmann adds.

On the road again

How will those "great little thermometers" respond when climate change makes their habitats too hot or too dry for them?

Research conducted by Hellmann and Shannon Pelini, one of Hellmann's doctoral students, indicates that global warming may affect a single insect species differently throughout its various life stages, and that global warming affects different insect species in different ways.

Most importantly, as climate change progresses, some insects may become trapped - like fish out of water - in habitats that can no longer support them. They may therefore go extinct or lose genetically important segments of their populations. But other species, and no one knows which ones yet, may be able to reach cooler climates by moving north on their own.

Will such mobile species be able to survive on the unfamiliar plants living in their new habitats? To help answer that question, Pelini conducted laboratory experiments that involve exposing caterpillars of two butterfly species to climates and plants that occur across their ranges, and then monitoring the growth and survival rates of these groups.

She will soon announce in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) how populations of these two butterfly species that live at the edges of their ranges will be affected by climate change and the various factors that may limit or reduce their northward expansion.

Hellmann is currently following up on Pelini's research by surveying thousands of genes in the two butterfly species in order to identify those that are turned off or on by climate change. These studies are designed to reveal the genetic bases for the tolerance of some insect species to climate change and the intolerance of others.

A controversial strategy

But the potential of some insect, plant and animal species to survive outside of their native habitats begs the question: should endangered species whose habitats are harmed by climate change be manually moved to more accommodating habitats? Hellmann warns that this idea, called "managed relocation" or "assisted migration," remains highly controversial.

"Under some circumstances, managed relocation might be wildly successful and save a species from extinction," says Hellmann. "But under other circumstances, relocated species may overpopulate their new habitats, cause extinctions of local species or clog water pipes as invasive zebra muscles have done in the Great Lakes." Such risks have traditionally compelled most scientists to reject managed relocation.

"Ten years ago, we would have said, 'No way. Managed relocation is a stupid idea.' And that's because the best strategy is to reduce greenhouse gases. But we are not reducing greenhouse gases fast enough."

That is why a working group co-led by Hellmann and partially funded by the National Science Foundation recently developed a new analytical tool to help decision-makers determine if, when and how to relocate a particular species of plant, animal or insect based on multi-disciplinary considerations.

These considerations include the possibility of success of the relocation, its potential for causing ecological harm, relevant regulations and the cultural importance of impacted species.

David Richardson of Stellenbosch University in South Africa says that the tool, which he and other members of the working group announced in a recent PNAS article, represents "a new way to balance the risks of inaction vs. action" to help species survive climate change.

There is a difference between conducting managed relocation and introducing invasive species to new ecosystems. "If we thought that a species had the potential to become invasive, meaning it might become harmful where it was introduced, we would not want to consider that species as a candidate for managed relocation," says Hellmann.

The types of species that are most likely to become invasive are species that have high growth rates, weedy plant species and species that prey on other species, such as the brown tree snake. Species that are less likely to become invasive include those that are endangered or highly specialized or that we have some way of controlling.

"You just have to make sure that your managed species don't turn into invasive species. And that is the heart of the debate over managed relocation," says Hellmann.


Read more!

Bugs! The critters eating America's forests

The Independent 5 Jul 09;

They may be tiny, but they're marching across the US in their billions, killing vast swathes of woodland. Graham Mole reports on a modern-day plague

America's 4 July bonfires served a dual purpose yesterday. They burned the wood of trees destroyed by a trio of bugs that are devastating parts of the nation's forests.

With 750 million acres of forests in the United States, the scale of the problem is massive. Since 1999, the country has lost, on average, 1 per cent of its tree cover per year. This means these small insects have killed about 10 per cent of all US forests in 10 years.

Two of the bugs, says the government, have the potential to destroy $700bn (£429bn) worth of forests.

Already, one beetle – the emerald ash borer – has invaded 13 US states and two Canadian provinces. In those places, all movements of firewood are illegal and contractors who have moved logs have been fined by the courts and banned from working in the quarantined areas.

Last month, the emerald ash borer (or EAB) was identified in New York State, home to 700 million ash trees which sustain a profitable furniture industry and even provide the raw material for baseball bats. Ironically, the trees were replacements for elms killed off by Dutch elm disease. America's chestnut trees have also suffered catastrophic damage from blight.

The borer, which comes from China, first entered America in the wood of crates shipped to Detroit in the early 1990s, but it was 2002 before it was formally identified. The tiny, creamy-white larvae bore through the bark and adults start emerging in mid-June. The larvae damage causes general yellowing and thinning of the foliage, followed by crown dieback and the eventual death of the tree. The borer has killed around 50 million trees in Michigan and tens of millions in 12 surrounding states and in Canada's Ontario and Quebec.

Therese Poland, of the US Forest Service, said that in a bid to attract, trap, identify and monitor the insect, the service has researched the odours, or kairomones, produced by the ash; these allow the insects to identify the trees. Ms Poland said the service is hoping to find the "ultimate attractant", and it is hoped this will prove more successful than the sticky traps hoisted in tens of thousands of ash trees across the Midwest. Another theory – not Ms Poland's – is that purple attracts the male insect because it replicates the colour of a female's backside.

Ms Poland added that one of the problems is that the borer is difficult to find because the eggs are very small and are laid in bark cracks. The larvae can live under the bark for two years before they emerge from the wood in which they have been feeding, which means a harmless-looking piece of firewood can turn into a beetle-bomb.

"You stack the firewood up at your cabin and if it doesn't get burned right away, then a whole bunch of beetles might come out of it next year," Ms Poland said, adding that one piece of firewood could produce up to 50 beetles.

As the populations take hold and multiply, their range can increase exponentially. "The worst-case scenario is it could, in theory, wipe out ash trees in North America," Ms Poland said. "It could be as bad or worse than Dutch elm or chestnut blight."

Rick Hoebeke, an entomologist from Cornell University, said: "I would say the outlook for ash, if it [EAB] becomes widespread, is pretty bleak."

The economic impact could also be sizeable. The government says the eastern US produces nearly 114 million feet of ash board, valued at $25.1m. Mr Hoebeke added: "To lose a major species of hardwood like that would be devastating for a lot of industries, not to mention the impact on the ecosystem."

One of the hardest-hit towns is Worcester, Massachusetts, right in the heart of maple country, which has suffered a major onslaught of the Asian long-horn beetle (ALB). This beetle also came from China, and has been costing New York City and Long Island up to $40m a year since it arrived in 1996.

Meanwhile, the mountain pine beetle is rampant in the states of Colorado, Wyoming and Montana, among others. This insect, which, unlike the other two, is a North American native, has killed more than half the lodge pole pine over 14.5 million hectares in British Columbia and is now spreading into neighbouring Alberta.

It's a desperate situation for the Canadian forestry industry, which was already reeling from the collapse of the US housing market and has had to be bailed out by the Canadian government.

Foresters say that in recent years the numbers of the pine beetle have reached plague proportions, due in part to warmer winters which didn't deliver the below-40-degree cold snaps that used to kill off its larvae. So huge were the populations that, according to Staffan Lindgren, a professor of entomology, there were stories of what people called "beetle rain". He explained: "Under a perfectly blue sky, farmers would start hearing what sounded like rain on their tin roofs. It turned out it was beetles coming out and falling on the roofs, literally billions and billions of beetles."

But all is not lost – at least according to Rob Mangold, director of forest health protection for the US Forest Service. In an exclusive interview he insisted that the forests could recover, but said they did need to be managed very differently.

"Forests are resilient. An area might be bare, but the trees will come again. But it is a big impact and we have a big mountain pine epidemic in the West, especially Montana, Wyoming and Colorado," he said.

Last year alone, the mountain pine beetle killed six million acres of forest, but still Mr Mangold has hope. He insisted: "We have to manage the forest better – making sure there is the right mix of ages and species – not just all one type, one age. And the social licence for managing forests is there now, the best for 15 years.

"Only 10 years ago, people were saying how 'you can't cut the trees down, we must preserve the forest'. Now they want us in to manage it."

As for the two exotic invaders – the EAB and the Asian long-horn beetle: "We don't want 'em, but we got 'em," said Mr Mangold. Already, the ALB has been eradicated from Chicago and big efforts to control it continue in New York.

But Worcester, Massachusetts, remains a problem; 22,000 trees have had to be cut down. Mr Mangold said: "The city is very forested, really close to the maple forests of Central New England. It's had a big impact on the city streets and we're going to do a lot of replanting there. The whole situation was also exacerbated by a huge ice storm that laid a lot of non-infested trees on the ground."

One solution being touted in the forest community is that they could bring in the EAB's Chinese predators, a form of wasp, but so far it's remained no more than an idea. Nationally, however, the big worry is climate change.

"The implications are a concern to us," Mr Mangold said. "It's getting drier and hotter and we want to plant what should be the right trees for the right place but that's getting more difficult to work out. To some extent we're on unknown ground. I'm not trying to minimise what's going on because there are certainly big impacts locally and the EAB could be in more states that we haven't caught up with yet. We got a big country and it's hard to find these things."

Meanwhile, the prospects for eradicating the emerald ash borer look dim. Mr Mangold admitted: "We're probably going to have to learn to live with this thing."

There could be a lot more bonfires to come...


Read more!

Fears for the world's poor countries as the rich grab land to grow food

• UN sounds warning after 30m hectares bought up
• G8 leaders to discuss 'neo-colonialism'
John Vidal, guardian.co.uk 3 Jul 09;

The acquisition of farmland from the world's poor by rich countries and international corporations is accelerating at an alarming rate, with an area half the size of Europe's farmland targeted in the last six months, reports from UN officials and agriculture experts say.

New reports from the UN and analysts in India, Washington and London estimate that at least 30m hectares is being acquired to grow food for countries such as China and the Gulf states who cannot produce enough for their populations. According to the UN, the trend is accelerating and could severely impair the ability of poor countries to feed themselves.

Today it emerged that world leaders are to discuss what is being described as "land grabbing" or "neo-colonialism" at the G8 meeting next week. A spokesman for Japan's ministry of foreign affairs confirmed that it would raise the issue: "We feel there should be a code of conduct for investment in farmland that will be a win-win situation for both producing and consuming countries," he said.

Olivier De Schutter, special envoy for food at the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said: "[The trend] is accelerating quickly. All countries observe each other and when one sees others buying land it does the same."

The UN's food and agricultural organisation and other analysts estimate that nearly 20m hectares (50m acres) of farmland – an area roughly half the size of all arable land in Europe – has been sold or has been negotiated for sale or lease in the last six months. Around 10m hectares was bought last year. The land grab is being blamed on wealthy countries with concerns about food security.

Some of the largest deals include South Korea's acquisition of 700,000ha in Sudan, and Saudi Arabia's purchase of 500,000ha in Tanzania. The Democratic Republic of the Congo expects to shortly conclude an 8m-hectare deal with a group of South African businesses to grow maize and soya beans as well as poultry and dairy farming.

India has lent money to 80 companies to buy 350,000ha in Africa. At least six countries are known to have bought large landholdings in Sudan, one of the least food-secure countries in the world.

Other countries that have acquired land in the last year include the Gulf states, Sweden, China and Libya. Those targeted include not only fertile countries such as Brazil, Russia and Ukraine, but also poor countries like Cameroon, Ethiopia, Madagascar, and Zambia.

De Schutter said that after the food crisis of 2008, many countries found food imports hit their balance of payments, "so now they want to insure themselves".

"This is speculation, betting on future prices. What we see now is that countries have lost trust in the international market. We know volatility will increase in the next few years. Land prices will continue to rise. Many deals are even now being negotiated. Not all are complete yet."

He said that about one-fifth of the land deals were expected to grow biofuel crops. "But it is impossible to know with certainty because declarations are not made as to what crops will be grown," he said.

Some of the world's largest food, financial and car companies have invested in land.

Alpcot Agro of Sweden bought 120,000ha in Russia, South Korea's Hyundai has paid $6.5m (£4m) for a majority stake in Khorol Zerno, which owns 10,000ha in Eastern Siberia, while Morgan Stanley has bought 40,000ha in Ukraine. Last year South Korea's Daewoo signed a 99-year lease for 1.3m hectares of agricultural land in Madagascar.

Devinder Sharma, analyst with the Forum for Biotechnology and Food Security in India, predicted civil unrest.

"Outsourcing food production will ensure food security for investing countries but would leave behind a trail of hunger, starvation and food scarcities for local populations," he said. "The environmental tab of highly intensive farming – devastated soils, dry aquifer, and ruined ecology from chemical infestation – will be left for the host country to pick up."

In Madagascar, the Daewoo agreement was seen as a factor in the subsequent uprising that led to the ousting of the president, Marc Ravalomanana. His replacement, Andry Rajoelina, immediately moved to repeal the deal.

Concern is mounting because much of the land has been targeted for its good water supplies and proximity to ports. According to a report last month by the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development, the land deals "create risks and opportunities".

"Increased investment may bring benefits such as GDP growth and improved government revenues, and may create opportunities for economic development and livelihood improvement. But they may result in local people losing access to the resources on which they depend for their food security – particularly as some key recipient countries are themselves faced with food security challenges", said the authors.

According to a US-based thinktank, the International Food Policy Research Institute, nearly $20bn to $30bn a year is being spent by rich countries on land in developing countries.


Read more!