Best of our wild blogs: 11 Oct 09


27 Oct (Tue): WWF's Coral Triangle Photo Expedition Slide Show from wild shores of singapore

Do birds perspire?
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Sucks to be me
from The annotated budak and full of head and suppertime

Tanah Merah - Saron!
from Singapore Nature

Nighty arty farty
from talfryn.net

The net shift
from The annotated budak

In search of …10 Kings behind the Wallacea Line
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Scandinavian Cleantech Forum Singapore
from Green Business Times

CleanTech Happy Hour October
from Green Business Times


Read more!

Comprehensive guide on Singapore's migratory birds launched

Dylan Loh, Channel NewsAsia 10 Oct 09;

SINGAPORE: Nature lovers now have a guide to enhance their bird-watching experience.

A book was launched Saturday by the Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve.

It features a photographic guide on the different bird species that have been sighted at the reserve since 1988.

The book also contains information on the migratory birds - where they come from and when they can be sighted.

As many as 60 different species can be spotted in a single day during the annual migratory season between September and March.

Some of the birds include globally threatened species like the Chinese Egret and Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher.

The book is available at the visitor counters of the wetland reserve, Pulau Ubin and Bukit Timah Nature Reserve.

- CNA/yb


Read more!

Reclaiming land with the help of nature

Turning The Tide
Bangkok Post 11 Oct 09;

Have you ever been to Bangkok beach? I am talking about a natural beach by the sea, not the one at the Suan Siam water theme park on the outskirts of the city. Bangkok beach is actually part of Bang Khun Thian district. It is the only area in Bangkok that is by the sea.

If you had never known about it, you are not alone. The area has changed so drastically that it is hard to understand how and why the area is called Bangkok beach. To start with, the beach has been swallowed by history. What was once the sea has become an inland swamp, making the area look like a lake district. Several decades ago, however, the beach stretched for about 5km, and much of the site was covered by mangrove forests.

Then came the shrimp farms. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of rai of mangrove forests were cleared to enable quick money to be made from shrimp farms. But with the mangroves gone, the strong waves from the sea kept eating away the shore line, devouring the beaches.

Due to the unstoppable coastal erosion, the whole area will soon be totally submerged.

According to this year's report by the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Samut Prakan, Samut Songkhram and Samut Sakhon will bear the blunt of climate change, which will probably increase the sea level of the Gulf of Thailand by more than 32cm. More than half of the impact is expected to occur in the western parts of Bangkok, especially Bang Khun Thian district where the shoreline has receded 5km due to coastal erosion.

The study projects that more than a million people in Bang Khun Thian, Bang Khae and Bang Bon districts in Bangkok and Samut Prakan's Phra Samut Chedi district will be hit hardest. The damage is estimated at 140 billion baht.

That sound like an apocalypse in the making for local residents. Yet, the Khlongpittayalongkorn School is determined to fight against the rising tide by replanting mangroves. Facing the sea, the 32-rai school is surrounded by degraded shrimp farms and mangroves.

"We are confronted by harsh conditions. We lack fresh water and the land has been rendered salty by seawater intrusion. So, we have to teach our students to be self-reliant because the elements are against us," said Kritphol Klinhom, the director of the school, who initiated the mangrove reforestation scheme five years ago.

Watching the rising sea eating away the shore line, he decided to make mangrove forest conservation a top priority by assigning his students to take care of newly grown mangrove trees.

"A lot of people have come here to plant mangroves in Bang Khun Thian. Some villagers are even operating a mangrove forest planting business, and they make money from it. But the trees rarely thrive as no one looks after them. So, our school feels it is our duty to help to look after the young trees. As a result, you will never see fallen or neglected mangrove trees here," said Mr Kritphol.

Mangrove reforestation is only one of the school's many environmental conservation programmes. Other projects include a garbage bank, organic farming, turning food waste into biogas energy and saline agriculture - a special programme to improve soil condition. The school's proudest initiative is the sufficiency-economy project - a scheme created to honour His Majesty the King for introducing this philosophy. Fish, shrimp and cockles are raised in the mangrove forest's water to sell to local vendors. Other by-products from the mangrove forest are also turned into money - the leaves are sold for making herbal tea and the soil is used to make salted eggs.

Everything in the school has value - discarded water tanks are turned into nurseries for breeding fish and frogs. The packages used for containing ice cream are retained - not thrown away as usual - and cleaned so that students can recycle them into baskets, hats or other handicraft items.

For its efforts, Khlongpittayalongkorn School has received numerous school awards - the most recent one is from Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn. The school is also one of 181 schools participating in the Honda School Environment Project V that showcases His Majesty the King's conservation and sufficiency economy principles.

"We have to teach students to learn about their community. We believe students should return to help their community. Therefore, they are taught to protect their mangrove forests and save their land. Here, our students are taught to preserve the environment since a healthy natural environment is the only thing that can help them survive in the long run."

The beach in Bang Khun Thian has passed on, but hope lives at Klongpittayalongkorn School. Sometimes, hope is more beautiful than the sea, sand and sun.

How are you helping to reduce your carbon footprint?


Read more!

Dying to make us happy: The bloody truth behind the dolphinarium

The Independent 11 Oct 09;

Ever since 'Flipper' died in his arms, Richard O'Barry has been on a mission to stop the killing and capture of dolphins. This month, as Andrew Johnson reports, that ambition moves one step closer – when the annual slaughter in Taiji, Japan, is exposed to the world in a new film.

Richard (Ric) O'Barry is a marked man. Whenever he travels to Taiji, a tiny former whaling village on the southern coast of Japan, he has to wear a disguise. There are people there who would like to kill him. Or, at the very least, give him a severe beating and run him out of town. Nevertheless, he goes there every year – he has just returned – dodging police tails and shadowy underworld figures as he tries to put an end to the annual slaughter of thousands of dolphins that he inadvertently helped to start.

"I spend more time with people who want to kill me than with my four-year-old daughter and my wife," he says. O'Barry lives in Coconut Grove in Florida, and though he will be 70 next month, he has the vigour and passion of a young man. And, like many activists, he is thorny, single-minded, committed and difficult. He has to be.

During the 1960s, O'Barry pioneered the underwater training of dolphins for the American film and television show Flipper. A kind of aquatic Lassie, Flipper lived in a fictional marine park in Florida and helped out with sea rescues and crime busting, while keeping an eye on Sandy and Bud, the children of the park's warden and the (human) heroes of the show.

O'Barry, a former Navy diver, started out in the Miami Seaquarium, one of only three dolphinariums in the world at the time. He caught five female bottlenose dolphins in the wild to play the role of Flipper (females are less aggressive and so don't come with the scars that male dolphins inevitably pick up). The five were called Patty, Kathy, Scotty, Squirt and Suzy. The role of Flipper was played predominantly by Suzy, however, and she and O'Barry formed a close bond.

Until then no one had trained dolphins underwater, and it was O'Barry's diving skills that came to the fore. "They'd give me the script and it said Flipper does this, and I'd have to figure out a way to get her to do it," O'Barry says. It was a good life. He lived in the house used in the filming, at the Seaquarium in Florida, with the five dolphins just down the beach.

The show was a worldwide hit and introduced millions of people to the grace and intelligence of dolphins. Unsurprisingly, they wanted to see these amazing creatures for themselves – to watch them walk on their tails, or leap high out of the water through hoops. And so dolphinariums sprung up all over the world – there are now more than a hundred – giving rise to a multibillion-dollar trade in live dolphins.

At the time no one, least of all O'Barry, knew the effects of captivity on dolphins: that, free in the oceans, they swim 40 to 100 miles a day; that the chemicals in the water causes health problems and blindness; that the life span of a captive dolphin is reduced from around 25 years in the wild to about five; that half of all dolphins die within 90 days of capture.

"Very few people see dolphin captivity as a problem," O'Barry says. "The dolphin is smiling, the music is playing, the sun is out, everyone's having fun. What's not to like?

"But apart from the other problems, they also have a problem with inbreeding. The live trade is banned in Europe and America. They want to capture dolphins in the wild but they can't import them in the US or Mexico or Europe. Some are imported through Turkey, however. The Dominican Republic has a large dolphin show called Ocean World. They tried to import 12 dolphins from Taiji for around £1m. We went to the government and asked them to stop it, which they did. So now Ocean World is suing me for $300m. I go to court on 2 November."

The turning point for O'Barry came in 1970. The film Flipper had been released in 1963, and the spin-off TV series ran from 1964 to 1967. After that, Suzy retired and remained in the Miami Seaquarium where she was looked after by O'Barry. He had started to notice her unhappiness, however, and when she died in his arms, he was convinced she'd committed suicide. "Dolphins are not automatic air breathers," he says. "Every breath for them is a conscious effort. She looked me right in the eye, took a breath and held it. She just sank to the bottom of the water. That had a profound effect on me. So the next day I started a campaign to stop the capture of dolphins. It was Flipper's death that made me realise that dolphins shouldn't be in captivity."

Taiji is a small fishing port on the south-east coast of Japan. Each year thousands of dolphins swim along their migratory routes past its beautiful coastline. Tourists flock to see them and, during the summer, pleasure boats, often shaped to look like dolphins or whales, take thousands of visitors out to spot pods of the frolicking cetaceans whose mysterious "smile" and apparent intelligence holds a timeless fascination for humans.

On the surface, Taiji is a town that seems to love the dolphin – there are pictures of the creatures everywhere. Taiji, however, is also the biggest supplier of live dolphins to seaquariums, dolphinariums and "swim with dolphin" programmes in the world. It also slaughters them.

Once the visitors have gone home at the end of the summer another, more sinister, flotilla takes to the waves and the dark secret of Taiji is played out. These boats have long pipes attached to their sides which run the full height of the boats and trail deep into the water. The boats will surround a pod of unlucky dolphins while the crew bang the top of the pipes with hammers and the resultant cacophony, transmitted into the sea, plays havoc with the dolphins' inbuilt sonar and communication system. The boats form a line and herd the confused and disoriented dolphins into a small cove (see box, above). Once they are corralled, a net is strung across the entrance to prevent their escape.

The dolphins, crammed into the small bay like a herd of penned cattle, are left overnight to calm down. Then, representatives of dolphinariums, desperate to replenish the dwindling gene pool of their captive money-spinners, wade into the water to pick off the best of the crop.

A few will be plucked from the teeming cove of Taiji for a short lifetime of captivity in the world's dolphinariums. Those left behind will be butchered one by one, either by having their throats cut or with a pike driven into their neck, so the meat can be sold in supermarkets, in a slaughter that will turn the water in the bay crimson. It is the live dolphin ' business, however, that underpins the slaughter. "Each live dolphin is worth $154,000 [about £96,000] and the business is worth $2bn [about £1.2bn]," O'Barry says. "This is the economic underpinning of the slaughter. That's what's rewarding the fishermen. In The Cove [the documentary film about O'Barry and the Oceanic Preservation Society's work in Taiji, released this month] we see 30 dolphin trainers in the water. When we go to dolphin amusement parks they are displaying these dolphins."

Except in a few isolated whaling communities, there is no history or tradition of eating dolphin meat in Japan. The fishermen of Taiji and the yakuza, the Japanese mafia who are believed to have a big hand in the whaling and dolphin business, are therefore attempting to create a market by claiming it is a traditional food. They also pass it off as whale meat, O'Barry says.

The slaughter in Taiji will continue from now until the end of the season in March, by which time about 2,300 dolphins will have been killed or shipped off to an aquatic coliseum (about 10 per cent of the 23,000 dolphins and porpoises that will be killed in Japanese waters this year).

While activists have known about the slaughter for years, until recently, no one was able to get into the cove to witness the scale of the killing first-hand, or to capture it on film to show the world. The land surrounding the bay, a national park, is fenced off with barbed wire and patrolled during the dolphin season by guards and dogs. O'Barry had started going to Taiji in 2002 to campaign against the slaughter. "I'd known about it for 15 years," he says, "but I didn't do anything. I assumed that people were campaigning against it. I was shocked to learn there was no opposition."

In 2005, the film-maker Louie Psihoyos contacted O'Barry, asking if he could follow him around with a film camera. O'Barry agreed and Psihoyos quickly decided he wanted to film, for the first time, the annual dolphin slaughter of Taiji. The horrific spectacle of the actual slaughter is handled with decorum. What makes The Cove so fascinating, however, is the story of how the film-makers and O'Barry managed to get into the cove to film what happened there.

To do so, Psihoyos gathered a crack team – all experts in their various fields – and mounted a clandestine operation worthy of a spy thriller to plant secret cameras and listening devices. The team was trailed by the local police throughout their time in Taiji – at one point in the film a panicked "abort, abort" is shouted through the radios when something, which turns out to be a wild animal, is spotted.

"I always felt in danger," Psihoyos adds. "We were under 24-hour police surveillance. There was always a car in the hotel parking lot which followed us to our rendezvous. The reality was much more dangerous than it comes across in the film. We were concerned for our lives. The yakuza showed up, too. It was the middle of the night. These fishermen carry big knives. Anything could have happened and the authorities wouldn't have cared too much about us."

The endeavour makes for tense viewing. The team are constantly followed by sinister men in white cars as they drive around Taiji. They are also confronted by angry fishermen. The climactic operation, undertaken after dark, is filmed on a shaky hand-held camera through night-vision equipment.

At one point, the team fears it has been spotted as the free divers are still underwater and there is a tense wait for them to surface so they can flee before the dark figures who seem to be rushing towards them reach them.

In the end, the underwater cameras were of little use; the sea quickly turned red when the killing began. The sound from the underwater microphones – dolphins make voluble clicks – was deeply shocking, however.

"There is an arrest warrant out for me for trespass," Psihoyos, a National Geographic photographer, says. "Which is a problem, because the film is going to be shown at the Tokyo International Film Festival [TIFF] and I would like to go."

Ironically, O'Barry points out, the best hope for the dolphins is the pollution of the seas. Analysis of dolphin meat shows it contains high levels of mercury. Mercury poisoning of seafood is a particularly resonant issue in Japan (see box, this page). Dolphin meat from Taiji, taken from supermarket shelves, has been shown to contain levels of mercury up to 10 times higher than considered safe. The analysis has been carried out by several groups, including O'Barry and his team as well as in research conducted by the Universities of Hokkaido and Daiichi. This exposure led the state assembly of Wakayama, the prefecture in which Taiji lies, to remove dolphin meat from the school-meals programme in Taiji. O'Barry says the meat was being given free to schools in a cynical attempt to create a market. Supermarkets are also increasingly removing dolphin meat from their shelves.

"The fishermen were livid when the meat was taken off supermarket shelves," O'Barry says. "They blame it on me. At the heart of it is the yakuza, who are very involved in fisheries and whaling. There's no telling what they will do. If you have a problem in Japan you call the yakuza and whoever is causing the problem disappears. We are up against fishermen who are pushed to the edge and aren't going to take it any more. We've shown their meat is contaminated."

At first O'Barry and Psihoyos feared that the TIFF (where, this month, The Cove will be shown for the first time in Japan) would not screen the film due to the cultural climate in Japan. But pressure from Hollywood stars such as Ben Stiller, who has become involved in the campaign since seeing The Cove in America, forced a change of mind.

"They weren't going to show it," O'Barry says. "It was only after Stiller and his Hollywood friends called the director of the festival and condemned the censorship and hypocrisy [this year's TIFF has a green theme, with green carpets instead of red ones] that they agreed to the film being shown."

For O'Barry, the battle will not be over until the slaughter at Taiji is stopped. While the film-makers have gone on to different projects, he is once again in Taiji trying to end the carnage that he, inadvertently, helped bring about all those years ago with Flipper.

The climax of The Cove is an International Whaling Commission meeting in which the Japanese lawyer plays down the scale of the slaughter. O'Barry, wearing a flat-screen television on his chest like a sandwich board, gatecrashes the meeting and causes mayhem as he displays footage of the slaughter captured for The Cove. "This all started in 1970, but I never planned to do it for the next 40 years," O'Barry says. "When I started campaigning for dolphins in the 1970s I was coming from a place of guilt. Flipper was the best and worst thing that happened to dolphins. It made people aware of them but it created this multimillion-dollar industry. This wasn't a chosen career, and I don't feel guilty any more. It's not something I want to do. It just happened. I can't stop now, though. Not with Taiji about to be exposed."

The Cove has already caused an international outcry and dolphins caught in Taiji this year have been released. Psihoyos adds that The Cove is also a testament to what one inspired and dedicated person can achieve. "It shows that one passionate person can make a difference," he says. "You can change things if you are dedicated. We can stop this horror show. It's a win for dolphins, a win for Japan and a win for the environment." n

'The Cove' is released in cinemas nationwide on 23 Oct. For more information about Richard O'Barry's campaign, visit www.dolphinproject.org

Cove breakers

How Taiji's secret was filmed

Mercury rising

The Minamata mystery solved

The film-makers behind The Cove faced enormous difficulties bringing the slaughter of the dolphins to the public's attention. The geography of the cove, in Japan's coastal town of Taiji, meant that Richard O'Barry and director Louie Psihoyos had to use a mixture of stealth and expertise to film the fishermen's actions.

O'Barry and Psihoyos raised $2.5m in the planning stages for the documentary, then enlisted a team of activists and divers to assist them. The team started by going to the land areas of the cove at night, dressed in black, to place cameras disguised as rocks in strategic positions to film the killing. Other cameras onshore were able to record the Japanese divers whose job is to bring harpooned dolphins to the surface of the water.

Then, professional freedivers Mandy-Rae Cruickshank and Kirk Krack placed an underwater camera near the shore, where the dolphin's blood collects. They also put underwater microphones nearby to pick up the dying dolphins' cries. The cameras filmed those dolphins selected to be transported to aquariums being moved away from the cove to another area (top right of graphic, above), while the "rejected" animals enter the constricted area, top left, and are slaughtered.

A dolphin-shaped "blimp" (top, with Psihoyos far left in picture) was launched to get aerial footage of the dolphins' plight, but didn't manage to capture any film: it did, however, distract the Japanese authorities. Also in the aerial unit was a mini-helicopter, which filmed the fishermen – taken together, these scenes form a dramatic section of The Cove, which won the Audience Award at this year's Sundance Film Festival in the US.

In April 1956 a mysterious disease broke out in the factory town of Minamata on the west coast of southern Japan. It particularly affected children and was first noticed in a five-year-old girl who was having difficulty walking and speaking. The symptoms of what became known as Minamata disease came over people without warning. By October 1956, 40 cases of the disease had been recorded and14 people had died.

The cause was soon traced to mercury poisoning, caused by high levels of the element in the seafood caught in the bay and eaten. The Chisso Corporation's chemical plant, which dumped wastewater into the Minamata bay, was immediately suspected of being the cause.

Then, in 1965, a second outbreak of the disease occurred in Niigata, about 850 miles to the north. Again, this was caused by a factory sinking its toxic waste into the sea. Only in 1968 did the government admit Minamata disease was "a disease of the central nervous system... caused by long-term consumption, in large amounts, of fish and shellfish from Minamata Bay", and that the poisoning was caused by mercury due to wastewater deposits from the Chisso plant.

In all, as of 2001, 2,265 victims had been recognised (1,784 of whom had died). More than 10,000 people were paid financial compensation from Chisso, which by 2004 had paid out $86m ( about£53m) in compensation. AJ

Cover breakers: How Taiji's secret was filmed

The filmmakers behind 'The Cove' faced enormous difficulties bringing the slaughter of the dolphins to the public's attention. The geography of the cove, in Japan's coastal town of Taiji, meant that Ric O'Barry and director Louie Psihoyos had to use a mixture of stealth and expertise to film the fishermen's actions.

O'Barry and Psihoyos raised $2.5m in the planning states for the documentary, then enlisted a team of activists and divers to assist them. The team started by going to the land areas of the cove at night, dressed in black, to place cameras disguised as rocks in strategic positions to film the killing. Other cameras onshore were able to record the Japanese divers whose job is to bring harpooned dolphins to the surface of the water.

Then professional freedivers Mandy-Rae Cruickshank and Kirk Krack placed an underwater camera near the shore, where the dolphin's blood collects. They also put underwater microphones nearby to pick up the dying dolphins' cries.

The cameras filmed those dolphins selected to be transported to aquariums being moved away from the cove to another area (top right of graphic above), while the 'rejected' animals enter the constricted area, top left, and are slaughtered. A dolphin-shaped 'blimp' (top, Psihoyos is left of picture) was launched to get aerial footage of the dolphins' plight, but didn't manage to capture any film: it did, however, distract the Japanese authorities. Also in the aerial unit was a mini-helicopter, which did film the fishermen - taken together, these scenes form a dramatic climax to 'The Cove', which won the Audience Award at this year's Sundance Film Festival in the US.

Mercury rising: The Minamata mystery solved

In April 1956 a mysterious disease broke out in the factory town of Minamata on the west coast of southern Japan. It particularly affected children and was first noticed in a five-year-old girl who was having difficulty walking and speaking. The symptoms of what became known as Minamata disease came over people without warning. By October 1956, 40 cases of the disease had been recorded and14 people had died.

The cause was soon traced to mercury poisoning, caused by high levels of the element in the seafood caught in the bay and eaten. The Chisso Corporation's chemical plant, which dumped wastewater into the Minamata bay, was immediately suspected of being the cause.

Then, in 1965, a second outbreak of the disease occurred in Niigata, about 850 miles to the north. Again, this was caused by a factory sinking its toxic waste into the sea. Only in 1968 did the government admit Minamata disease was "a disease of the central nervous system... caused by long-term consumption, in large amounts, of fish and shellfish from Minamata Bay", and that the poisoning was caused by mercury due to wastewater deposits from the Chisso plant.

In all, as of 2001, 2,265 victims had been recognised (1,784 of whom had died). More than 10,000 people were paid financial compensation from Chisso, which by 2004 had paid out $86m ( about£53m) in compensation. AJ


Read more!

Shark fin ban ends cruel slaughter

Ministers act to close a loophole in EU law that lets fishermen mutilate rare species and dump them in the sea to die

Robin McKie, The Observer The Guardian 11 Oct 09;

A ban on shark finning in UK waters is to be introduced by the government, ministers will announce this week. The practice, which involves slicing fins from sharks at sea and dumping their bodies overboard – often while still alive – has been heavily criticised by campaigners and blamed for pushing many shark species to the brink of extinction.

Shark finning was banned by the EU in 2003 but loopholes in the legislation have allowed fishing boats in UK waters to continue finning. It is estimated that hundreds of tonnes of shark fin have been landed since the European "ban" was introduced.

The government has decided to close this loophole, following the passing of an early day motion in the House of Commons. MPs demanded that "on no occasion should the UK government approve any derogation from the shark finning legislation in order to allow UK-registered vessels to remove shark fins at sea". The government has agreed to follow the example set by MPs, a decision that will be warmly received by wildlife groups, who have long campaigned for the UK to introduce a ban on finning.

Shark fins are used as an Asian delicacy – mainly as the key ingredient in shark fin soup – and sell for more than £200 per kilo. And it is this high price that has led to the spread of shark finning. Instead of taking the entire body of a shark back to port, fisherman hack off the animal's most lucrative parts, its fins, and then throw the rest of it away. The sharks can no longer swim and either starve to death or are eaten alive by other fish. Species targeted this way in UK waters include the shortfin mako, blue, smooth hammerheads and thresher sharks, as well as species such as Portuguese dogfish and gulper sharks.

Finning these species is officially banned by the EU. However, a derogation scheme allows member states to grant special permits that allow their fishing vessels to remove shark fins at sea provided the quantity of fins on board is kept below 5% of the weight of shark bodies. Many scientists say this figure is too high and allows fishermen to land two or even three fins for every shark carcass they land. Hundreds of tonnes of shark fin have been landed by the UK fleet under these permits since the EU shark finning regulation was adopted. But now UK fisheries ministers have decided to halt the issuing of these permits, a move that will ensure the UK fishing fleet complies with the original intent of the EU finning ban – that sharks are landed with their fins naturally attached. As Sonja Fordham, policy director of the Shark Alliance, recently told the BBC: "Requiring that sharks be landed with their fins attached is by far the most reliable means of enforcing a ban on shark finning."

The move should also ensure that fishermen catch far fewer sharks in UK waters and will be seen by campaigners as a significant step to help prevent many shark species being driven to extinction.

"Right now, the oceans are being emptied of sharks, and the scale of the problem is global," Dr Julia Baum, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, told the American Association for the Advancement of Science conference earlier this year. "If we continue, we are looking at a really high risk of extinction for some of these species within the next few decades."

With Britain agreeing to the ban on shark finning, attention will focus on Spain and Portugal, who are now considered the main shark finning nations in Europe and the primary obstacles to an effective EU finning ban. As part of this campaign, UK ministers are to write to Joe Borg, the European commissioner for fisheries and maritime affairs, to request an urgent review of shark finning regulation throughout the EU.


Read more!

UK supermarkets warned over banana price war

As growers in the developing world go out of business, fears are growing for the stability of some small economies dependent on the crop
Jamie Doward, The Observer The Guardian 11 Oct 09;

It started as a skirmish between supermarkets, of interest only to those in the grocery trade. But Asda's decision to repeatedly slash the price of its bananas now threatens to undermine the fair trade movement and spells catastrophe for those who work in the industry, according to leading organisations representing fruit growers.

Renwick Rose, the chief executive officer of Winfa – the Windward Islands Farmers Association, whose 4,000 banana farmers export almost exclusively to Britain, has described the price war as "a scandalous way of doing business at the expense of farmers" and warned it will plunge banana growers into a "race to the bottom" that will benefit no one in the long term.

He was speaking after Asda cut the price of its loose bananas to 38 pence a kilo, its sixth cut in six weeks and a move that placed acute pressure on rivals to follow suit.

In a sign that the price war is spreading, European giants Aldi and Lidl have also drastically slashed the price of their bananas, something that will have disastrous consequences for growers in the medium to long term, according to the Fairtrade Foundation which guarantees to buy the fruit at an agreed price from banana farmers.

"Price cuts serve only to devalue bananas yet further, creating a false illusion among shoppers that they can be sustainably produced for such give-away prices," said the Foundation's Barbara Crowther.

That the banana – Britain's most popular fruit – finds itself on the frontline of a supermarket turf war is nothing new. With more than 140 million of them eaten each week in the UK, bananas are supermarkets' best sellers after lottery tickets and petrol. For this reason, changes in their price, as with other staples such as bread, milk and baked beans, are keenly noticed by consumers.

UK sales have risen by some 150% over the past 17 years, but the massive increase in the volume of bananas flooding into the country has brought with it deflationary price pressures. Four years ago the price of loose bananas fell below 84p a kilo, down to as low as 67p a kilo, before clawing back up to about £1 last year.

But the scale of the price slashing by the supermarkets this time represents an unprecedented and possibly devastating blow for the industry. It could not have come at a worse time for the growers. Banana farmers in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific are currently begging the European Union to increase a potential €100m bailout to €500m claiming the soaring prices of pesticides, fertilisers and oil, as well as a spate of storms, have left them nursing significant losses that threaten to put them out of business.

No wonder Rose is a worried man. Charged with promoting the interests of Fairtrade banana producers in Dominica, St Vincent, St Lucia and Grenada, he has a big job on his hands. Since 1992 some 20,000 of the 24,000 farmers in the islands have gone out of business. Now the future for its remaining farmers looks bleak.

Already in the past year, before prices fell off a cliff, Dominica saw a 50% reduction in the number of farmers exporting Fairtrade bananas to Britain while the number in St Vincent has declined by more than 30%.

"The prices are ridiculous, it almost makes a nonsense of the concept of trade," Rose said contemptuously. "I don't know if that price [Asda's] can even cover the cost of transportation."

It is not just the farmers who will lose out if the islands' banana industry collapses. In the Windward Islands, bananas pay for schools, buses and crucial infrastructure. They have no plan B.

Asda and the other retail giants insist their suppliers will not take the hit – and that the real winner in this battle will be consumers. Alex Brown, Asda's produce director, said: "We're footing the bill so we can guarantee the move won't have any impact on the price we pay our suppliers, and any other retailer following our lead should make that same commitment."

But the complex economics that underpin the banana trade suggest in the long term both small and large scale banana growers could suffer from a price war.

The timing is significant. In January the supermarkets will agree new contracts with their suppliers. Given the historically low prices at which the big chains are now selling bananas, they are likely to demand hefty cuts from their suppliers.

Any squeeze on suppliers' margins will be passed down the chain, with consequences for plantation workers. "Do these guys not realise what they're doing to us?" said a spokesman for the Coordinating Body of Latin American Banana Workers' Unions. "They are putting all the costs of the 'crisis' in Britain on our backs."

Plantation workers have been feeling the effects of the price wars since the millennium. "Prices to suppliers are one-third lower than seven years ago and few plantation workers now earn anything like a living wage," said Alistair Smith, international coordinator with Banana Link, which campaigns for banana workers' rights.

Downward pressure on prices has been exacerbated by a gradual lifting of tariffs in the EU to comply with world trade agreements. As a result, the Latin American plantations, and an increasing number from West Africa that farm bananas on an industrial scale, are replacing higher-cost smallholders. The shift has been dramatic. Between 1992 and 2007, UK banana imports almost doubled from 545,000 tonnes to 927,000 tonnes. Over the same period, banana imports from Caribbean countries fell from 70% of all imports to less than 30%. Cheaper Latin American "dollar" bananas now make up about half of UK imports.

The Fairtrade Foundation has attempted to protect smaller growers by setting a minimum guaranteed price paid to its farmers. The system seemed to work with many shoppers prepared to pay a small premium to buy Fairtrade bananas. Sainsbury and Waitrose even switched all their bananas to Fairtrade – which means they have had to absorb big hits to follow Asda's price-cutting lead.

"We know shoppers are concerned about ensuring that farmers and workers are treated fairly, and want to do the right thing," Crowther said. "Seven in 10 say they will buy products on these principles if they are slightly more expensive."

But with Asda selling Fairtrade bananas for £1.29 a bag, the huge discrepancy between the price of Fairtrade and normal bananas is obvious. The consequences for the Windward Islands, which exports close to 200,000 tonnes to the UK each year, are catastrophic, according to Rose.

Rose accused the likes of Asda of "using our product for their own ends without any commensurate returns for farmers." He said: "People get the wrong idea this food can be produced this cheaply. It can undermine the whole question of fair trade."

His warning came on the day the government gave the Fairtrade movement a £12m grant to mark the 15th anniversary of its launch in the UK. Last year more than £700m was spent on Fairtrade goods in the UK.

"We want to make sure that we're also able to persuade other retailers to come on board and to offer Fairtrade products," said Douglas Alexander, the international development secretary.

But Rose said the actions of some of the supermarket chains now threatened to jeopardise the success of the movement. Pointing out that 85% of banana farmers in the Windward Islands were Fairtrade registered, he said: "The very viability and continuation of the industry is at stake and even the reputation of Fairtrade. If the industry collapses the uninformed are [unfairly] going to blame Fairtrade."

The price war has revived calls for an ombudsman to oversee the supermarkets' activities. This idea was proposed by the Competition Commission last year, but the supermarkets are lobbying against it. The business secretary, Lord Mandelson, must give his response to the commission's proposals by next month and aid charities are keen to up the ante before his decision. "The supermarkets have been found guilty of exploiting suppliers and the creation of an ombudsman is a sensible solution which the public would welcome," said Dominic Eagleton of Action Aid, which claims polls show eight out of 10 shoppers back the idea.

Ultimately, whatever Mandelson decides will be only a minor diversion in a seemingly inexorable narrative. In a globalised world, it will be the invisible hand of the market that is likely to dominate and as a result the supermarkets may one day end up reaping what they have sown. Asda's owner, Walmart, for example, has more than half the wholesale market in Costa Rica – now, thanks to the "race to the bottom", the biggest banana exporter to the UK.

"If those who supply supermarkets are not able to make a living, whether in Britain or on the other side of the world, then the consequences are unemployment and poverty," Smith said.

"This means those affected cannot afford to buy the products they need in the very same supermarkets that have put them out of business. These wars are not just pointless in the short term; for retailers in the long term they could be suicidal."


Read more!

Ethiopia suffers from Middle East animal smuggling

Tsegaye Tadesse, Reuters 10 Oct 09;

ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - Ethiopia should take urgent steps to curb animal smuggling to the Middle East that is cutting into export earnings worth tens of millions of dollars to the poor country every year, a senior official said.

Livestock exports are an important source of hard currency for the Horn of Africa nation, which boasts 50 million cattle, 50 million sheep and goats and more than half a million camels.

It made $53 million from exports last year, but Berhe Gebreigziabher, at a top official at the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, said crime was slashing revenue.

"A significant number of live animals ... are being smuggled to neighboring states to be re-exported to Middle Eastern countries," he told Reuters on Friday.

"Our animal sector resources are being stolen and taken to other nations. The government must adopt strict policies and control mechanism to stop the illegal trade undermining us."

Berhe, who heads the ministry's Animal and Plant Regulatory Department, said the authorities should support economic growth by adding value to their exports, not just selling livestock.

The government has converted tens of thousands of acres in the Oromia, Amhara and Somali regions to rangeland for the leather goods sector, which it hopes will earn $200 million from exports in 2009/10 (July-June), up from $100 million in 2008/09.

The country used to export mostly raw hides and skins to markets in Europe and Asia, generating about $30 million a year in the late 1990s. It has since built dozens of tanneries, shoe factories and other leather-working facilities.

Among the major buyers of Ethiopian-made shoes are Germany, Italy, China, India and the United States.

(Editing by Daniel Wallis)


Read more!

'Scary' climate message from past

Richard Black, BBC News 10 Oct 09;

A new historical record of carbon dioxide levels suggests current political targets on climate may be "playing with fire", scientists say.

Researchers used ocean sediments to plot CO2 levels back 20 million years.

Levels similar to those now commonly regarded as adequate to tackle climate change were associated with sea levels 25-40m (80-130 ft) higher than today.

Scientists write in the journal Science that this extends knowledge of the link between CO2 and climate back in time.

The last 800,000 years have been mapped relatively well from ice cores drilled in Antarctica, where historical temperatures and atmospheric content have left a series of chemical clues in the layers of ice.

But looking back further has been more problematic; and the new record contains much more precise estimates of historical records than have been available before for the 20 million year timeframe.

Sustained levels

The new research was able to look back to the Miocene period, which began a little over 20 million years ago.

At the start of the period, carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere stood at about 400 parts per million (ppm) before beginning to decline about 14 million years ago - a trend that eventually led to formation of the Antarctic icecap and perennial sea ice cover in the Arctic.

The high concentrations were probably sustained by prolonged volcanic activity in what is now the Columbia River basin of North America, where rock formations called flood basalts relate a history of molten rock flowing routinely onto the planet's surface.

In the intervening millennia, CO2 concentrations have been much lower; in the last few million years they cycled between 180ppm and 280ppm in rhythm with the sequence of ice ages and warmer interglacial periods.

Now, humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases are pushing towards the 400ppm range, which will very likely be reached within a decade.

"What we have shown is that in the last period when CO2 levels were sustained at levels close to where they are today, there was no icecap on Antarctica and sea levels were 25-40m higher," said research leader Aradhna Tripati from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).

"At CO2 levels that are sustained at or near modern day values, you don't need to have a major change in CO2 levels to get major changes in ice sheets," she told BBC News.

The elevated CO2 and sea levels were associated with temperatures about 3-6C (5-11F) higher than today.

No doubting

The data comes from the ratios of boron and calcium in the shells of tiny marine organisms called foraminifera.

The ratio indicates the pH of sea water at the time the organisms grew, which in turn allows scientists to calculate the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere.

The shell fragments came from cores drilled from the floor of the Pacific Ocean.

According to Jonathan Overpeck, who co-chaired the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) work on ancient climates for the organisation's last major report in 2007, this provides a more accurate look at how past CO2 values relate to climate than previous methods.

"This is yet another paper that makes the future look more scary than previously thought by many," said the University of Arizona scientist.

"If anyone still doubts the link between CO2 and climate, they should read this paper."

The new research does not imply that reaching CO2 levels this high would definitely result in huge sea level changes, or that these would happen quickly, Dr Tripati pointed out - just that sustaining such levels on a long timescale might produce such changes.

"There aren't any perfect analogies in the past for climate change today or in the future," she said.

"We can say that we've identified past tipping points for ice sheet stability; the basic physics governing ice sheets that we've known from ice cores are extended further back, and... I think we should use our knowledge of the physics of climate change in the past to prepare for the future."

Averting danger

At the Rio Earth Summit of 1992, governments pledged to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations "at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system".

What that level is has been the subject of intense debate down the years; but one figure currently receiving a lot of support is 450ppm.

On Tuesday, for example, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its prescription for tackling climate change, which sees concentrations of greenhouse gases peaking at the equivalent of 510ppm of CO2 before stabilising at 450ppm.

The Boxer-Kerry Bill, which has just entered the US Senate, also cites the 450 figure.

"Trouble is, we don't know where the critical CO2 or temperature threshold is beyond which ice sheet collapse is inevitable," said Dr Overpeck.

"It could be below 450ppm, but it is more likely higher - not necessarily a lot higher - than 450ppm.

"But what this new work suggests is that... efforts to stabilise at 450ppm should avoid going up above that level prior to stabilisation - that is, some sort of 'overshoot' above 450ppm on the way to stabilisation could be playing with fire."

Because of concerns about short-term sea level rise, the Association of Small Island States (Aosis), which includes low-lying countries such as The Maldives, Palau and Grenada, is pushing for adoption of the much lower figure of 350ppm.

But with concentrations already substantially higher, political support for that is scanty outside Aosis members.


Read more!