Flash floods in parts of Singapore after heavy afternoon downpour

Channel NewsAsia 3 Apr 08;

SINGAPORE: Several parts of Singapore saw flash floods after the heavy downpour on Thursday afternoon.

At Commonwealth Lane, the water went as high as the bumper of some cars. There was also flooding at Mount Pleasant Road. Several callers to Channel NewsAsia's hotline reported floods along Bukit Timah Road and Dunearn Road as well.

Some said those who sought shelter at bus stops were forced to stand on the seats to avoid the rising water.

A car also skidded along the Lornie Road flyover near MacRitchie Reservoir in the direction of Upper Thomson Road. No one was injured. - CNA/ac

Heavy rain ruins theatre show, causes flash floods
Straits Times 4 Apr 08;

THE opening night of a theatre production in Mohamed Sultan Road was a bit of a washout - after heavy rain soaked through the roof of the theatre, affecting power and lights.

The crew of TheatreWorks were gearing up for the opening night of its new production, Dance Dance Dance, at the converted warehouse until about 5.30pm.

Managing director Tay Tong said: 'The rain came through in huge torrents, like a waterfall.'

Across Singapore, there were reports of flash floods after heavy rainfall between 4.20pm and 6pm. About 107mm of rain was dumped yesterday - 60 per cent of the monthly average for April, said the Public Utilities Board.

Floods in places such as Dunearn Road near Swiss Club Road, Upper Paya Lebar Road near Bartley Road, and Commonwealth Avenue lasted about 20 minutes.

For TheatreWorks, the show will go on today, Mr Tay promised.

TEH JOO LIN


Read more!

Precautions against HFM Disease taken in Singapore kindergartens, nursery schools

Channel NewsAsia 3 Apr 08;

SINGAPORE: Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan on Thursday said he is worried about the different strains of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). He is especially concerned about the EV71 strain.

"With EV71, children can die if it is not detected early. So I think we should take this seriously," he said.

But whichever HFMD strain it may be, Mr Khaw said his ministry is taking the situation seriously and is watching developments closely.

Kindergartens and nursery schools have been taking precautions, with teachers conducting regular checks on their students to see if they are showing symptoms of the disease.

As part of the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Education, any pupil who shows symptoms will be isolated from others while waiting to be sent home.

HFMD is a common childhood disease spread through direct contact with body fluids or excretions such as saliva or faeces.

Young children, particularly those aged less than five years, are the most susceptible. - CNA/ac

Worry over HFMD strain
Straits Times 4 Apr 08;

THE higher number of people infected this year with a potentially lethal strain of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) - known as Enterovirus 71 (EV 71) - is worrying Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan.

He said: 'When it is not EV 71, while it is a nuisance, it seldom causes death. But with EV 71, children can die if it is not detected early. So we should take this seriously.'

An outbreak of EV 71 in 2000 and 2001 killed more than 70 kids in Asia, including seven here.

So far this year, 4,423 people have contracted HFMD. The Health Ministry sounded the alarm last week when it noticed a 'higher' than usual number of patients coming down with the EV 71 strain, but did not go public with the figure.

Mr Khaw urged parents to be alert for the symptoms - fever, sore throat, and rashes or blisters on the hands and feet.

He also urged them to keep unwell children away from school.

'There is no vaccine, there is no cure, so the key strategy is still prevention,' said the minister, who spoke to reporters yesterday after watching a preview of a television documentary on renowned plague physician, Dr Wu Lien-Teh.


Read more!

Solar activity 'not behind climate change'

'No Sun link' to climate change
Richard Black, BBC News 3 Apr 08;

Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun's activity.

The research contradicts a favoured theory of climate "sceptics", that changes in cosmic rays coming to Earth determine cloudiness and temperature.

The idea is that variations in solar activity affect cosmic ray intensity.

But Lancaster University scientists found there has been no significant link between them in the last 20 years.

Presenting their findings in the Institute of Physics journal, Environmental Research Letters, the UK team explain that they used three different ways to search for a correlation, and found virtually none.



This is the latest piece of evidence which at the very least puts the cosmic ray theory, developed by Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark at the Danish National Space Center (DNSC), under very heavy pressure.

Dr Svensmark's idea formed a centrepiece of the controversial documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle.

Wrong path

"We started on this game because of Svensmark's work," said Terry Sloan from Lancaster University.

"If he is right, then we are going down the wrong path of taking all these expensive measures to cut carbon emissions; if he is right, we could carry on with carbon emissions as normal."

Cosmic rays are deflected away from Earth by our planet's magnetic field, and by the solar wind - streams of electrically charged particles coming from the Sun.

The Svensmark hypothesis is that when the solar wind is weak, more cosmic rays penetrate to Earth.

That creates more charged particles in the atmosphere, which in turn induces more clouds to form, cooling the climate.

The planet warms up when the Sun's output is strong.

Professor Sloan's team investigated the link by looking for periods in time and for places on the Earth which had documented weak or strong cosmic ray arrivals, and seeing if that affected the cloudiness observed in those locations or at those times.

"For example; sometimes the Sun 'burps' - it throws out a huge burst of charged particles," he explained to BBC News.

"So we looked to see whether cloud cover increased after one of these bursts of rays from the Sun; we saw nothing."

Over the course of one of the Sun's natural 11-year cycles, there was a weak correlation between cosmic ray intensity and cloud cover - but cosmic ray variability could at the very most explain only a quarter of the changes in cloudiness.

And for the following cycle, no correlation was found.

Limited effect

"This work is important as it provides an upper limit on the cosmic ray-cloud effect in global satellite cloud data," commented Dr Giles Harrison from Reading University, a leading researcher in the physics of clouds.



His own research, looking at the UK only, has also suggested that cosmic rays make only a very weak contribution to cloud formation.

The Svensmark hypothesis has also been attacked in recent months by Mike Lockwood from the UK's Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory.

He showed that over the last 20 years, solar activity has been slowly declining, which should have led to a drop in global temperatures if the theory was correct.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in its vast assessment of climate science last year, concluded that since temperatures began rising rapidly in the 1970s, the contribution of humankind's greenhouse gas emissions has outweighed that of solar variability by a factor of about 13 to one.

According to Terry Sloan, the message coming from his research is simple.

"We tried to corroborate Svensmark's hypothesis, but we could not; as far as we can see, he has no reason to challenge the IPCC - the IPCC has got it right.

"So we had better carry on trying to cut carbon emissions."


Read more!

Extreme weather starving Uganda's pastoralists

Alexis Okeowo, Yahoo News 3 Apr 08;

John Lochaon does not just survive on less than one dollar a day. He has streched out 15 dollars for nine months in a part of Uganda that climate change is plunging into famine.

Lochaon has been unable to make a living because he lives in Karamoja, one of the driest and least developed areas in this east African country and one with a lack of infrastructure and basic services.

Drought forces the one million-plus people in this northeastern region bordering Kenya and Sudan to constantly move around searching for food.

"I have two problems: old age and hunger," said the elderly Lochaon, who does not know his age. He sat on a log outside of his thatched-roof hut, his long, shrivelled limbs stretched over the dusty ground as lizards scurried by.

"Climate change is having a strong impact here - Karamoja is now in an emergency," said Alix Loriston, deputy director of the UN World Food Programme.

The semi-arid region has typically experienced drought since the 1960s, every five to 10 years.

But since 2000, the phenomenon has become more frequent and more disastrous. Karamoja, which has no irrigation system, has suffered extreme drought for two years straight, preventing harvests altogether.

Uganda's floods last autum left 400,000 homeless. Climate experts said they were also a consequence of global warming, and washed away what little crops existed.

In Karamoja's St. Kizito Hospital, emaciated babies swaddled in sheets filled rows of cribs. Their mothers, draped in brightly-patterned cloths, leaned over the silver bars of the beds.

The hospital said it treats over 350 children a day for severe malnutrition.

Harvesting is usually done once a year, during the wet season, said James Lemukol, a hospital doctor. "For the rest of the year, there is a dry spell of time."

Karamojong Ellen Moru said she was waiting for rain. Seated under the shade of a lifeless tree, Moru shared a small bowl of fruit for lunch with three other women and six children.

"It is two years since we had a harvest," she said. "If the rains come this year maybe we will have one; if not, this situation will worsen."

Moru, who has four children, said she had to hunt for wild fruits and vegetables. Behind her, tall, lanky Karamojong, bedecked in kaleidoscopic fabric and carrying walking sticks, roamed past scruffy bushes in the homestead.

Local leaders said the people rely on local alcohol, water, wild fruits and even ants and rats for sustenance.

"People live a day at a time," said Chuna Kapolon, a Karamojong politician.

To compound problems, as climate change dries the land, residents fight over ever-scarcer resources.

Cattle are the most prized possession of the Karamojong, prompting them to steal and even die in gunfights for the animals. With a lack of successful harvests, cattle are even more vital.

The Karamojong and their neighbours, the Turkana and Pokot of Kenya, also cattle-herders, have been engaged in conflict for centuries, often resulting in death and destroyed property.

The semi-nomadic tribes, once armed with bows and arrows, have now become equipped with illegal guns.

Uganda estimates that there are up to 40,000 weapons in Karamoja -- one for every 24 people. The army is forcibly disarming the nomads, which has resulted in several deaths on both sides.

For now, however, both cattle and food are lacking in Karamoja.

WFP said it will distribute enough food to meet the needs of 300,000 people, but that it lacks enough funds to feed the rest.

"The rains have been unpredictable and unreliable. You cultivate crops then they fail to germinate," said Anna Sagal, adjusting her neon-green headscarf as she stood in the dry heat waiting for a food handout.

Scientists on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned last September that the effects of global warming are already being felt in Africa.

Africans are expected to face a severe lack of food and drinkable water by the end of the century.


Read more!

Chinese pollution quietly takes toll in Japan

Kyoko Hasegawa, Yahoo News 2 Apr 08;

With a smile on her tanned face, skiier Kazumi Furukawa can vividly recall the time three years ago she stood here on Mount Zao and looked down at fir trees turned into glittering crystals.

"The sky was cobalt blue and I could see the tiny snow crystals on the tips of the tree branches," Furukawa, 56, remembers.

But these days the natural phenomenon is growing rarer and scientists say the culprit is beyond Japan's control -- industrial pollution from China.

Mount Zao is whipped every year by wet winds from across the Sea of Japan (East Sea) that form layers of ice and snow that shine like crystals. The Japanese call them "juhyo," or ice trees.

Skiiers from Japan and other Asian nations regularly fly to the 1,600-metre (5,280-foot) mountain just for a glimpse of the juhyo, which local people describe as little monsters for their intricate twisted shapes.

Fumitaka Yanagisawa, an assistant professor of Yamagata University who has studied the juhyo for nearly two decades, warns that the frost is increasingly mixed with acid, spelling danger for the trees' future.

This year he recorded the highest yet levels of acid, "which could have severe ramifications on the eco-system," he said.

Looking at satellite data, he and another professor, Junichi Kudo of Tohoku University, concluded that the acid in the trees came from sulfur produced at factories in China's Shanxi province.

Since he first wrote about his research in a scientific journal in 2006, elementary school teachers have asked him to give lectures to local children.

"It's hard to explain this kind of scientific evidence to children, but finally they seem to come up with the same question: 'What are you going to do about the problem?'" Yanagisawa said.

He regretted that he had no good answer.

"The pollution comes from outside Japan. There's a limit to what local residents here can do," he said.

Mount Zao is only one example of pollution hitting Japan from China, where factory emissions are causing international concern as its economy soars ahead.

Some schools in southern Japan and South Korea have occasionally curbed activities because of toxic chemical smog from China's factories or sand storms from the Gobi Desert caused by rampant deforestation.

Environmental ministers of China, Japan and South Korea agreed last year to look jointly at the problem, but Tokyo has accused Beijing of secrecy.

"About yellow sand, I am not quite sure how and why it can be regarded as a national secret," Japanese environment minister Ichiro Kamoshita said in February.

Yanagisawa remembers making a presentation on his academic findings at a Chinese university in the early 1990s.

"When I suggested the possibility that Japan was being hurt by cross-border pollution from China, the whole audience booed my speech," he said with a bitter smile.

"Even now, it's a sort of taboo to mention cross-border pollution when I'm invited to give a speech in China," he said.

Japanese officials say they are hoping to cooperate on the environment with Beijing, as Tokyo has been trying to repair ties after years of friction.

"It will have adverse effects if we push China too much on cross-border pollution," said Reiko Sodeno, an environmental ministry official who has observed past bilateral talks.

"Blaming other countries wouldn't help to solve the problem, as it only hurts national pride," she said.

She said the goal was for Asian nations to come up with a treaty on long-range transboundary air pollution similar to agreements in place among European and North American nations.

Japan also suffered terrible air and water pollution as it built itself into the world's second largest economy, but the situation has been improving since regulations were imposed in the 1970s.

China has taken steps to clean up its air to avoid international embarrassment at the Beijing Games in August after a warning from the International Olympic Committee.

"I have high hopes that in this year of the Olympics for China that Beijing will cooperate in international efforts towards cutting emissions of air pollutants," she said.

China is also taking part in talks aimed at coming up with a treaty to succeed the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. China is expected soon to top the United States as the top emitter of greenhouse gases blamed for climate change.

But at current rates, emissions of nitrogen oxide -- a greenhouse gas that is the main cause of urban smog -- will increase 2.3 times in China and 1.4 times in East Asia by 2020, said Toshimasa Ohohara, head of air pollution monitoring research at the National Institute for Environmental Study.

"A lack of political leadership in East Asia would mean a worldwide worsening of air quality," he said.


Read more!

World grapples with aviation's climate change footprint

Charlie McDonald-Gibson, Yahoo News 3 Apr 08;

Air travel is booming as the world's population grows and fares fall, but its impact on Earth's sensitive climate must be taken into account in any new global warming pact, green groups say.

More than 900 delegates flew into Bangkok this week for a UN-led meeting on global warming, spewing about 4,181 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, an official from the United Nations climate body estimated.

Few would argue against holding such talks, which are vital to crafting a new pact on battling climate change, but activists are urging the world to include air and sea travel in any new accord.

"Aviation and maritime shipping are very big sources of emissions and they're growing fast," said David Doniger, climate policy chief at the New York-based Natural Resources Defense Council.

"I think that one thing that's not acceptable is to leave those sectors uncontrolled on the theory that they don't belong to anybody," he added.

Industry and green groups estimate that air travel accounts for between two and four percent of the world's emissions of greenhouses gases such as carbon dioxide, which trap the sun's heat and cause temperatures to rise.

Emissions from the sector look set to rise, however, with the number of global travellers predicted to double by 2020.

International aviation and shipping were excluded from greenhouse gas emissions reductions targets laid out in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the current global treaty addressing climate change.

Delegates from more than 160 countries are now in Bangkok trying to thrash out a work plan for a new agreement on how to curb emissions when the Kyoto Protocol's deadlines run out in 2012.

"I think everybody agrees that we have to find some way of addressing emissions resulting from aviation and shipping," said Yvo de Boer, the UN's climate chief.

"The big question is how. Is that inside the convention process or is it outside the convention process?"

Bill Hare, climate policy director with Greenpeace, said that airline emissions were tricky given that many countries are involved in one flight -- the departure point, arrival point and the nationality of the operator.

He argues that aviation emissions should be included in binding greenhouse-gas cuts for rich nations expected to be laid out in the new pact, with the country selling the fuel taking responsibility for the emissions.

"If you want to be an aviation hub, then there is a carbon cost to it," he told AFP.

This would then spur industry into developing more energy-efficient engines and air craft, he said.

Under the Kyoto agreement, UN organisations the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) were tasked with coming up with a solution to the industry's climate footprint.

"The bottom line is they haven't done anything," Hare said.

Some nations are pushing to leave the issue with the UN bodies, while the European Union has talked about a sector-based approach where airlines must cap their emissions, or buy "carbon credits" from other industries.

The industry was overwhelmingly against the EU idea, said Tom Ballantyne, an analyst with Orient Aviation magazine, but was not necessarily opposed to being included in any post-Kyoto agreement.

"They realise that they are going to have to confront this," he said, adding the aviation industry had yet to decide on a united stance on climate change.

British tycoon Richard Branson, president of the Virgin Atlantic airline, recently flew from London to Amsterdam on a Boeing 747 partially fueled by coconut and a variety of palm oil.

He later extolled the energy potential of algae, press reports said, and has pledged millions of dollars in research into new technologies.

Many green activists are, however, lukewarm on the idea of expanded use of biofuels to curb transport emissions, saying that it could also cause new problems including pressure on food prices.

"There is no golden solution to the replacement of fossil fuels. It's impossible to replace one thing by a single other source," said Marcelo Furtado of Greenpeace Brazil.


Read more!

Boeing makes first ever hydrogen battery flight

Yahoo News 3 Apr 08;

US aircraft maker Boeing flew a plane that was powered by a hydrogen battery at the start of 2008 for the first time in aviation history, senior company officials said in Spain on Thursday.

"For the first time in the history of aviation, Boeing has flown a manned airplane that was powered by a hydrogen battery," Boeing chief technology officer John Tracy told a news conference at the firm's research centre in the central Spanish town of Ocana.

The plane, which used propellers, flew at a speed of 100 kilometres (62 miles) an hour for about 20 minutes at an altitude of about 1,000 metres (3,300 feet) using only the hydrogen battery for power, Boeing said in a statement.

The director of the Ocana research centre, Francisco Escarti, said the hydrogen battery "could be the main source of energy for a small plane" but would likely not become the "primary soruce of energy for big passenger planes".

"The company will continue to explore their potential as well as that of all durable sources of energy that boost environmental performance," he said.

Tracy said the development was "a historical technological success for Boeing" and was "full of promises for a greener future".

"Boeing recognizes that pollution represents a serious environmental challenge," he added.

Amid rising fuel costs and mounting concerns over climate change, airlines are keen to find ways to cut their energy bills and the pollution which they emit.

Boeing's first new model in over a decade, the Dreamliner, used high-tech composites which reduces its weight and which the company says will make it consume 20 percent less fuel then similar-sized planes already on the market.


Read more!

Climate negotiators work on ambitious pact

Shaun Tandon Yahoo News 2 Apr 08;

Negotiators here are working on the world's most ambitious pact yet against global warming, but questions are growing about how to force governments to live up to the promises they make.

Week-long talks in Bangkok are aimed at laying the groundwork for global action after the Kyoto Protocol's commitments run out in 2012 for rich nations to slash greenhouse gas emissions blamed for heating up the planet.

The United States is the main holdout from the Kyoto Protocol, arguing it is too costly. But Kyoto signatories such as Canada, Japan and some southern European countries are all well off-track in their goals.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper made clear after taking office two years ago that his government would follow its own climate goals, not those of the Kyoto Protocol.

"The biggest concern comes from countries like Canada that have openly begun voicing doubts about whether they will comply or even care about complying," said Antonio Hill, senior policy adviser at British aid group Oxfam.

"We need to make darn sure that all countries comply," he said.

Kyoto calls for an average of five percent emission reductions by 2012 from 1990 levels, a sliver of cuts of up to 40 percent by 2020 proposed by the European Union in ongoing talks.

Canada has joined the United States in insisting on mandatory emissions cuts for fast-growing emerging economies such as China and India.

"The Canadian government is out here pointing the finger at other countries at a time when we've said we're not even going to bother reaching our targets," said Dale Marshall, climate change analyst at the David Suzuki Foundation, a Canadian environmental group.

"It's not just that Canada has very little credibility, but it undermines the whole process," he said.

Kyoto required Canada to slash emissions by six percent by 2012 under Kyoto, but as of 2006 its gas output had soared by 35 percent from 1990 levels.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, a nation that fails to meet its obligations can be penalised with tougher requirements under a future deal.

With few people noticing, the UN body that supervises the Kyoto Protocol last month ruled for the first time that a country had violated the treaty.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) found that Greece was not properly monitoring emissions, official documents showed. The UNFCCC will study possible punishment later.

Kyoto violators can only be restricted from the growing market in trading carbon emissions credits.

But Kyoto's supporters hope the biggest incentive of all comes from the growing awareness about global warming. On Saturday, tens of millions of people switched off their lightbulbs in the latest worldwide green campaign.

"I personally think that maybe the moral sanction is much more significant than the legal sanction," said Yvo de Boer, head of the UNFCCC.

"I think that no self-respecting government would want to see a newspaper headline that it has failed to meet its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol," he said.

That moral pressure appeared to work in the case of Japan, which has recently shifted stance and started to consider mandatory caps on emissions by industry.

Japan, which hopes to show leadership on climate change when it hosts the Group of Eight summit of major economies in July, was stung by green groups' criticism at a UN climate conference in December in Bali, Indonesia.

"It went all the way to the level of the prime minister, who was very concerned about the criticism that Japan was getting," said Alden Meyer, strategy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a US pressure group.

He noted that climate change was a factor in the defeat last year of Australian Prime Minister John Howard, a leading opponent of Kyoto.

"Nobody wants to be a climate scofflaw and pariah on this issue, which is moving up the radar screen as a geopolitical issue of first magnitude," Meyer said.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 3 Apr 08


Red dot goes black?
about the possibility of a Tuas coal-fired power plant on AsiaIsGreen blog

Mystery oil slick along East Coast Park beach
and Sentosa too, on the wildfilms blog

Making Love: Right Time or Wrong Time
a Crab Spider Story on Tiomanese's Blog

Malayan Whistling Thrush: Feeding the fledglings
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Take short sharp showers
monthly tip on sharp songs to sing to avoid wrinkly skin and save water on the do the green thing newsletter, go to the do the green thing website to record that you've done it.


Read more!

Malaysia scraps coal plant plans on environment worries

Reuters 2 Apr 08;

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysia has scrapped plans to build a 1.3 billion ringgit ($408 million) coal-fired power plant in eastern Sabah state on Borneo island due to worries it would pollute the environment, a newspaper reported on Wednesday.

The 300MW-plant was to have been built near a tropical forest by a subsidiary of state-controlled utility Tenaga Nasional and a Sabah state government agency, The Star reported on its Web site.

"After weighing the pros and cons, the cabinet decided to do away with the proposal because we do not want to risk the welfare of the communities in the area including their health and any adverse impact on the environment," Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman was quoted as saying.

He asked Tenaga to look for other sources of energy for Sabah.

Tenaga spokesman Sidek Kamiso said the company had not been officially notified of the government's decision.

($1=3.187 Malaysian Ringgit)

(Reporting by Liau Y-Sing, editing by Jacqueline Wong)

Malaysia scraps controversial coal power plant on Borneo island
Yahoo News 2 Apr 08;

Malaysia on Wednesday said it will scrap a 1.3 billion ringgit (408 million dollars) coal power plant in an environmentally sensitive area in eastern Sabah state on Borneo island.

"After careful consideration, we just cannot take the risk and destroy an environment that is intact. We need to look for more environmentally friendly sources of energy," Chief Minister Musa Aman said.

In 2006, state power company Tenaga Nasional's chairman Leo Moggie insisted the 300 Megawatt plant would have minimal impact on the environment.

But local environmentalists feared the coal plant would damage the environment, including the pristine Danum Valley forest.

"After weighing the pros and cons, the cabinet decided to do away with this proposal because we do not want to risk the welfare of the communities in the area including their health," he added.

Musa also said the decision to cancel the power plant was based on the fact that the proposed site was close to vital ecotourism sites.

"The proposed site is in proximity to conservation area like Darvel Bay, Malian Basin, Danum Valley and Ulu Segama, which are areas with highly sensitive ecosystems," he added.

"We cannot allow for such a plant to be built because these conservation areas have been designated as ecotourism sites."

Musa said Tenaga and the local Sabah Electricity had been ordered to look for alternative sources of energy and sites.


Read more!

Mystery oil slick along East Coast Park beach

Channel NewsAsia 2 Apr 08;

SINGAPORE : The National Environment Agency (NEA) said on Wednesday that its contractor is in the midst of cleaning up the East Coast Park beach following the discovery of oil patches in the area.

It said the cleaning operation is expected to continue on Thursday.

A member of the public alerted Channel NewsAsia to the discovery.

Patches of oil were first seen in the seas off East Coast on Wednesday, and some of the oil later reached the East Coast Park beach.

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) is trying to identify the source of the oil spill.

Port authorities said there was no report of oil pollution in port waters.

But marine officials said there were patches of oil off Sentosa Cove, seen at 7am. An anti-pollution craft was sent and a clean-up operation was completed by 2pm.

The MPA said port operations and vessel traffic remained unaffected.

The NEA said the affected beach begins from the Road Safety Park to the point just before the East Coast Lagoon.

As a precautionary measure, beach-goers are advised to avoid swimming in the water and using the beach along the affected stretch until further notice.

Both the MPA and NEA are investigating. - CNA/de


Read more!

Coolest March in Singapore in nearly two decades... but weather still getting hotter

Tania Tan, Straits Times 3 Apr 08;

THE weather last month may have called for sweaters, but make no mistake about it: Singapore is still sweltering in the heat of global warming, say experts.
Average temperatures dipped to a cool 26.5 deg C last month, making it the coldest March since 1990.

At its chilliest, the mercury dropped to 21.8 deg C due to the 'wetter than average' weather, said the National Environment Agency (NEA).

But despite the dip, a close tracking of temperatures over the last few years shows that the weather is getting hotter.

'I worry that people may forget the bigger picture,' said Associate Professor Matthias Roth of the National University of Singapore's department of geography.

'Even though we may have had a cool bout, it's important to realise that climate change is still happening.'

Since the 1970s, Singapore's average annual temperature has creptup from about 26 deg C to 28 deg C.

'This is in line with a global trend,' said the NEA.

Last month's lower temperatures were driven by freakishly wet weather. The rain was due to a pronounced La Nina effect, possibly the strongest since the 1970s, said Prof Roth.

Caused by a swirl of cooling air over the Pacific Ocean, the phenomenon usually results in cooler, wetter weather.

More than double the average amount of rainfall - up to 570mm - was dumped on some parts of the island in the first two weeks of last month, said the NEA's Meteorological Services Division.

Brief spells of heavy rain are expected to continue for the next two weeks as light and variable winds carry moist air in from the Pacific, said the NEA.

Asked whether climate change could be aggravating the La Nina effect, Prof Roth said scientists have yet to answer that question.

'It's still being debated,' he said.

But what is certain is that the planet is getting hotter.

In 2005, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that the earth's surface temperature was likely to rise between 1 and 6 deg C by the end of this century due to greenhouse gases, which trap heat.

To help combat climate change, some countries, including Singapore, have tried to cut carbon emissions through recycling, increasing energy efficiency and reducing waste.


Read more!

Eco-towns? British villagers say no, thanks

Business Times 3 Apr 08;

New housing in rural areas would do more harm than good

(STOUGHTON, England) The British may be among Europeans most concerned by climate change, but few people in this tiny village in the English Midlands want to be part of their government's latest proposal for a low-carbon future: an initiative called eco-towns.

Stoughton is one of about 60 areas under consideration for new eco-town developments, so-called because they are supposed to be made carbon neutral through clean technology and projects to reduce carbon dioxide. A shortlist of about 15 areas will be announced shortly, and Stoughton - like a number of other communities across Britain - is fighting hard to avoid selection.

Villagers in Stoughton and their politicians say that their area is predominantly rural and that these developments, containing up to 20,000 new homes, would do more harm than good to the environment and to the community.

They also say eco-towns are being used by developers as a smokescreen to win approval for unpopular projects to ease a chronic housing shortage in Britain.

The eco-town concept was mooted by Prime Minister Gordon Brown last year and it partly reflected his strategy to outflank the opposition Conservative leader, David Cameron, on green issues.

Government officials insist that eco-towns are an innovative way to cut greenhouse gases at a time when residential housing represents about a quarter of British carbon emissions. They also say that constructing entirely new infrastructure to create low-carbon housing is much more cost effective than adapting older housing. In part, the hostility toward eco-towns reflects the desire of locals to avoid new developments that would threaten their rural beauty spots. But it also highlights how difficult it could be for governments - even in green-minded countries like Britain - to find ways of developing housing that genuinely transforms the way citizens live and work.

Developers have 'stuck on the word 'eco' and they are hoping that will have a whole new appeal,' said Edward Garnier, a Conservative Member of Parliament who represents an area that includes Stoughton. 'I'm yet to be convinced that many of these eco-towns are anything more than reheated planning proposals that were turned down in the past,' he said.

Phil Edwards, a spokesman for the Cooperative Group, which owns the land and is seeking to develop the eco-town jointly with English Partnerships, a government agency, said plans for Stoughton were genuinely new. But he said it was too early to say what technologies would be used. Mr Edwards said those plans would be discussed with the community if an eco-town in Stoughton were given the go-ahead.

According to the British Housing Minister, Caroline Flint, the eco-towns would be entirely new kinds of settlements because of ways they would manage water, encourage community living, and prioritise pedestrians, cyclists and public transport.

Families would live within a 10-minute walk from newly developed schools and health centres, while fewer than half of all households would rely on cars for their transport needs. Each town would also have to set aside about half an hectare, or an acre, of green space for every hundred homes. Environmental experts say one sign that the government is serious about eco-towns is the promise of thousands of pounds of tax breaks for purchasers of zero carbon homes. - IHT


Read more!

Singapore well-stocked with rice; supplies secure

There is no shortage, say importers who have lined up contracts
Jessica Lim & Tessa Wong, Straits Times 3 Apr 08;

THE fragrance of rice hits you once you step into the warehouse.

Here, in Kaki Bukit, are sacks and sacks of rice from around the world, piled almost two storeys high.

The concrete-floored warehouse is one of three which stockpile rice, enough to last three months. The others are in Pasir Panjang and Senoko.

There is no shortage in Singapore now, importers said, although supplies are getting more difficult to come by as some rice-producing countries have imposed export controls.

Mr Jimmy Soh, managing director of rice importer Chye Choon Foods, said his shipments of rice have arrived from Thailand without a hitch.

Although concerned that Thailand, Singapore's biggest supplier, may restrict exports, importers have been quick to secure contracts, even at a premium, to ensure a smooth flow.

Two days ago, rice importer Goh Hock Ho paid US$820 (S$1,130) per tonne for Thai rice although he signed a three-month contract for US$570 per tonne last month.

Said Mr Goh, managing director of Saga Foodstuffs Manufacturing: 'If we refuse the new price, the exporters will stop supplying us. Last year we signed contracts where prices stayed constant for three months to a year. Now we have to top it up.'

Despite the price rises, Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry S. Iswaran assured Singaporeans at the weekend that the rice supply is adequate.

In the Philippines and Thailand, however, efforts have begun to stop hoarders and illegal traders from driving up prices.

The Philippine authorities yesterday ordered police to arrest hoarders and illegal traders, while the Thai government has released rice from its stockpiles to ensure supply to the poor.

Although Singapore has not had to dip into its stockpile, supermarkets and provision shops are reporting brisk sales.

At NTUC FairPrice - the biggest chain with 80 outlets - rice sales went up 50 per cent over the weekend, after it raised the prices of its cheaper house brands by 10 per cent to 15 per cent, said a spokesman.

At FairPrice's Ang Mo Kio Hub outlet, staff are now restocking shelves twice a day, instead of once.

Buying three 10kg sacks of premium Song He rice for about $60 yesterday was 63-year-old retiree S.P. Chan.

'Prices are increasing and everyone's buying more, so I thought I'd better get a spare bag for myself in case they're sold out soon,' he said in Mandarin.

'I'm getting another bag for my daughter because her favourite brand at her local supermarket is sold out already.'

There is no need for frenzied buying of rice, said Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case).

Case officers who visited supermarkets in the last two days found them well-stocked.

'There is sufficient rice to go around,' he said. 'It is not advisable to hoard. The more you hoard, the more you are artificially boosting demand and prices increase even more.'


Read more!

High food prices? Investors partly to blame

Straits Times 3 Apr 08;

Funds looking for high returns trade without concern for social impact
NEW YORK - HIGH food prices around the world? Blame - at least in part - the investors who moved their money into commodities in the past five years, looking for better returns than stocks and bonds were giving them.

From 2002, global investment funds started diving into oil, followed by metals and then grains.

The move was fuelled by falling interest rates in major economies, which make fixed-income investments less attractive, and a weak dollar, which tends to drive up the price of dollar-denominated investments like most grains.

This in turn attracted speculators, who took corn, soya bean and wheat prices to a whole new altitude.

Last month, corn futures hit a record US$5.88 (S$8.11) a bushel and soya beans US$15.86 on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), the benchmark for world prices. CBOT wheat peaked at US$13.49 a bushel in February.

CBOT rough rice futures on Monday hit an all time high of US$20.50 per hundredweight, while The Financial Times in February reported that the 'more representative benchmark' of Thai rice prices had hit a 25-year high of US$475 a tonne.

Stung by high transportation costs from record oil prices, food makers have passed some of the high crop prices to consumers and some producer nations have even withheld grain exports, including rice, to guarantee domestic supply.

But anger is rising over the soaring cost of food and fuel, with protests erupting across the globe in the past six months.

From the deserts of Mauritania to steamy Mozambique on Africa's Indian Ocean coast, people have taken to the streets.

There have been 'tortilla riots' in Mexico, villagers have clashed with police officers in eastern India and hundreds of Indonesians have marched for lower food prices.

'The idea is there are a lot of new players in the commodities futures game and those new players don't necessarily have a vested interest in the market beyond the speculative interest,' said Mr Chad Hart, an Iowa State University agricultural economist.

He also said that while agricultural commodities trade on fundamentals such as harvest reports, an influx of new money has made them more volatile.

'With speculation it means it tends to move much sharper than it did,' he said.

And Mr Gary Kaltbaum, who runs a hedge fund invested in grains, said: 'Unfortunately, I think when people are trading commodities, I don't think they are even caring about social impact.

'What these people do is invest and their job is to make money. If they think something's going to go higher, they are going to trade on it. They're not going to be worried about repercussions somewhere else.'

At the same time, Atlanta-based portfolio manager Tom Fernandes said: 'Investors...have 65 per cent to 95 per cent of their assets in stocks and underperforming assets.

'They've no choice but to make an allocation to something that's at least participating. On the long side, it's commodities at the moment,' he said.

A long position is a bet that prices will go up, while a short position is a bet that they will fall.

Traders said that the weight of long investors has crowded the space between producers and consumers in grain markets, which are much too small to handle the influx.

Total trading volume for a day in CBOT corn, soya beans and wheat is less than 1 per cent of the US$3 trillion traded each day on the global foreign exchange market.

And the combined value of the US corn, soya bean and wheat crop last year was just US$92.51 billion.

By comparison, outstanding US Treasury bonds total about US$4.6 trillion, and the market capitalisation of US stock markets is about US$16 trillion.

'The US imported US$36 billion worth of crude oil last month. If oil exporters then used this money to buy our wheat, they would have enough money to buy the entire US crop,' said Mr Peter Kordell, president of a Minneapolis commodity futures brokerage.

But laying all the blame for current commodity prices on hedge funds and speculators may not be fair.

'The fact that these grains markets are moving higher is a bonus to these funds but they would be equally content if these markets were in a downward spiral as they could make money shorting them,' said Mr Gavin McGuire, an analyst at Iowa Grain, a Chicago firm specialising in US grains futures.

Mr Kaltbaum, the Florida hedge fund manager, agreed: 'These things can cut both ways and there'll be a time when they go down also.

'When the fast money crowd sees things moving, they want to jump on.

'Until the bubble kind of bursts.'

REUTERS

Factors causing price spikes
Straits Times 3 Apr 08;

EXPERTS pinpoint a host of reasons for the food crisis, besides speculation and hoarding:

# BOOM IN DEMAND

Rising affluence in India and China has increased demand.

'China's population is proportionately much larger than the countries that industrialised in earlier periods and is almost double that of the current G-7 nations combined,' the Australian central bank said last year.

The Chinese, whose rise began in earnest in 2001, ate just 20kg of meat per capita in 1985. They now eat 50kg a year. Each kilogram of beef takes about 7kg of grain to produce, which means land that could be used to grow food for humans is being diverted to growing animal feed.

# BIOFUEL TROUBLE

As the West seeks to tackle the risk of global warming, a race towards greener fuels is compounding the world's food woes. The US has a mandate to produce nine billion gallons of ethanol, made from corn, this year and 10 billion gallons in 2009.

'Turning food into fuel for cars is a major mistake on many fronts,' said Ms Janet Larsen, director of research at the Earth Policy Institute. It has led to higher food prices in the US and in developing countries 'where it's escalated as far as people rioting in the streets', she said.

Similarly, palm oil is at record prices because of demand to use it for biofuel, hurting low-income families in Indonesia and Malaysia, where it is a staple.

# UNFAVOURABLE WEATHER

Erratic weather, perhaps due to climate change in grain-producing countries has played havoc with crops.

A severe 10-year drought in major wheat exporter Australia lit a fire under the wheat market.

Harvests have been affected by drought and heatwaves in South Asia, Europe, China, Sudan, Mozambique and Uruguay, the UN's World Food Programme said in November last year.

# RISING OIL PRICES

Record oil prices have boosted the cost of fertiliser and freight for bulk commodities. Stung by the high transportation costs, food makers have passed some of the high crop prices to consumers.

The oil price spike has also turned up the pressure for countries to switch to biofuels, which the FAO says will drive up the cost of corn, sugar and soya beans.

# CURB ON EXPORTS

A number of governments, including Egypt, Argentina, Kazakhstan, Vietnam, Thailand, India and China, have imposed restrictions to limit grain exports and keep more of their food at home and guarantee domestic supply.

The Vietnam Food Association has asked its members to stop signing new rice export contracts. Malaysia plans to import rice from other South-east Asian nations to build reserves.

The Philippines is buying the grain from an emergency regional stockpile and taking additional supplies from the US.

# NOT ENOUGH INVESTMENT

The farm sector has failed to invest enough in production over the past five years. With the US credit squeeze getting worse by the day, securing borrowings has become harder for farmers in the world's biggest grain exporter.

Also, grain elevators - companies that buy from farmers and remarket to processors - are seeing losses because they have committed to provide grains to processors at much lower prices.

# DISEASED CROPS

Vietnam's farm sector faces the prospect of a return of the deadly crop disease which affected its crop yield badly last year. A viral disease called tungro and infestations of the brown plant-hopper insect in its fields have also led to global supplies being drained.

Scientists are also worried about the spread of a wheat-killing fungus, known as Ug99, from Africa to Pakistan and India.

The spread of the deadly virus, against which an effective fungicide does not exist, threatens the vital Asian Bread Basket, including the Punjab region.

India and Pakistan are home to more than 50 million small-scale wheat farmers, who are more vulnerable to disease than bigger producers in developed countries, who can afford to purchase expensive fungicides to protect their crops.

REUTERS, BLOOMBERG, ASSOCIATED PRESS


Read more!

Rising fish costs push sushi prices up in Singapore

esther fung, Today Online 3 Apr 08;

Sushi lovers watch out. Your favourite dishes are going up in price.

Sakae Sushi raised the cost of a plate of its salmon sushi by 5 per cent to $1.99 in December, and now warns of possible further revisions this year.

"Fish prices rose by slightly less than 10 per cent last year because of the rising cost of fish feed such as corn," said Mr Douglas Foo, chief executive of Apex-Pal International, who founded the chain of conveyor-belt sushi restaurants in 1997.

It's not just fish. Rice is also getting more expensive to source, amid fears of looming shortages.

Mr Foo said this would result in more expensive sushi across the board, speaking at the company's annual report media briefing yesterday.

Apex-Pal is exploring cost-controlling measures such as buying in bulk directly from farms distributing it to other Singapore food and beverage companies.

While higher raw material costs is a challenge, Mr Foo is still keen on expanding the chain of 87 outlets worldwide, to about 100 outlets by the year-end. It is considering markets in the Middle East, Mongolia, Central Europe and Vietnam.

In January, it opened its first United States outlet in the Chrysler Building in New York, and is planning to open four other outlets in the Big Apple by the end of the year. It took 11 months to start operations in the US because of a myriad of regulations; in Singapore, Mr Foo said this can be done in one month.

"People thought we were crazy when we said we're starting an outlet in New York, but I think of our company as the Indiana Jones of the food and beverage market," said Mr Foo.


Read more!

Wheeling and dealing over climate change

Nirmal Ghosh, Straits Times 3 Apr 08;

IN BANGKOK - PENANG-BASED Meenakshi Raman has been talking about global warming since the run-up to the Earth Summit at Rio in 1992.

Once regarded as the alarmist concerns of a few offbeat scientists and unwashed greenies, global warming is now accepted as a civilisation-scale challenge.

But that is often cold comfort for environmental activists such as Ms Raman, honorary secretary of the non-governmental organisation (NGO) Friends of the Earth Malaysia.

This is because accepting the reality of global warming is about the only thing common to the vast array of characters on and around the stage of negotiating forums like this week's in Bangkok.

The five-day United Nations (UN) conference on climate change in Bangkok is supposed to take forward a road map agreed upon at last December's often acrimonious Bali meeting.

The eventual aim is an accord on cutting emissions beyond the Kyoto Protocol on reduction of greenhouse gases, which runs out in 2012.

The Bangkok meeting, with more than 1,000 delegates from 163 countries, is essentially a discussion on what to discuss - and in what order.

Bigger battles are in store at later meetings this year, and in Copenhagen next year when post-Kyoto commitments are supposed to be agreed.

'We have just 11/2 years to complete negotiations on what will probably be one of the most complex international agreements history has ever seen,' Mr Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said on the eve of the Bangkok meeting.

At the bottom of the complexity lies the pain - and politics - of change.

Environmental activists, who are largely limited to lobbying government delegates at the meeting, by and large advocate embracing change.

In this they are supported by developing countries which cite the fact that it is the world's richest nations that have contributed the most so far to carbon dioxide - CO2, the main driver of global warming - in the atmosphere.

But others, like some industry lobbies and the United States, want to avoid pain. Hence attempts to get around the problem instead of tackling its roots.

The defence of the status quo is not unique to rich countries, however. Society remains locked in a production- and consumption-centred economic model, which relies on cheap energy.

Take cars, for example. Rather than reduce the critical role of cars in our society, governments and the private sector have, in effect, put the car industry and current lifestyles on life support by developing biofuels to 'feed' cars.

But experts say the switch from growing food crops to biofuel crops is now one of the drivers of a rise in the price of grains and cereals.

At one end of the debate are people like Ms Raman, who argue that the climate crisis is a symptom of a larger disorder characterised by, among other things, over-consumption and the excessive use of fossil fuels.

In a discussion on Monday at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand, she said: 'I am afraid many people still don't get it. We can't carry on with business as usual; we need to change.'

At the other end of the spectrum are the likes of Melbourne-based Alan Oxley, a former Australian ambassador who champions market solutions and chairs an NGO called World Growth.

He denies his reputation as a climate change sceptic, yet spent much of a meeting with the media in Bangkok on Tuesday belittling the logic of British economist Nicholas Stern's 2006 report on the potential economic impact of climate change.

The Stern report is regarded as a seminal piece of work, as it was the first time a mainstream economist took the issue on board.

The irony is that both Ms Raman and Mr Oxley agree that growth is necessary.

It is in the growth pathway that their positions are fundamentally miles apart, reflecting a polarisation in the larger debate which threatens to delay changes that are required to avert worst-case global warming.

Mr Oxley recommends gradual change, with broad goals allowing each country to take its own decisions.

That would allow developing countries to keep growing so that they can lift the poor 'bottom billion' of the world out of poverty.

His critics would call it a clever tactic to cite the politically correct goal of Third World poverty alleviation as a cover for business as usual.

But he maintains that unrealistic goals would doom Kyoto and its successor to failure.

NGO Third World Network's Martin Khor, also Penang-based, speaking at the same forum as Ms Raman, took a position that acknowledged the extremes.

'We want to have growth continuing, but in a different way,' he said.

'For that to happen, we have to change many things - technology, energy systems, transportation, industry. We need a financial, technological, macro-economic and development-planning revolution that the world has never seen before, in a very short period of time.'

Many tough decisions are needed, by both developed northern countries and the developing south.

Mr Khor said: 'Countries like Germany and the US have the technology to be able to turn around the way they do things with minimal suffering, but developing countries don't.

'We have to cut our emissions but we face a major development crisis in how to manage this, and a crisis in relations between North and South, as to who is going to bear the cost.'


Read more!

New fish discovered in Indonesia: "May see like humans do"

Strange New Fish May See Like Humans
LiveScience.com Yahoo News 3 Apr 08;

While diving in the harbor of a small island in Indonesia recently, husband and wife Buck and Fitrie Randolph, with dive guide Toby Fadirsyair, found a strange fish and took some pictures.

The oddball creature looks like an anglerfish, but different. Its eyes, unlike those of nearly all fish, point forward and may allow the fish to gauge depth the way humans do.

The flat fish has tan- and peach-colored stripes and rippling folds of skin that obscure its fins. About the size of a human fist, it is soft and pliable enough to slip into narrow crevices of coral reefs - perhaps why it's never been seen before.


The divers could not find the fish in any reference books, so they consulted an expert.

"As soon as I saw the photo I knew it had to be an anglerfish because of the leglike pectoral fins on its sides," said University of Washington fish expert Ted Pietsch today. "Only anglerfishes have crooked, leglike structures that they use to walk or crawl along the seafloor or other surfaces."

Anglerfishes are found the world over and typically have lures growing from their foreheads that they wave or wiggle to attract prey.

The newly found fish has no lures so it burrows into a reef to find food.

"Several times I saw these fish work themselves through an opening that seemed much smaller than the fish, sometimes taking a minute or more to get all the way through," says David Hall, an underwater natural history photographer who was able to dive with Maluku Divers and take additional photos of the newfound creature. "They must have pretty tough skin to keep from being scraped and cut, but there is no evidence of superficial injury or scars in my photographs."

With its unusual flattened face, the fish's eyes appear to be directed forward, something Pietsch says he's never seen in 40 years studying the structure, classification and habits of fishes. Most fishes have eyes on either side of their head so that each eye sees something different. Only very few fishes have eyes whose radius of vision overlaps in front, providing binocular vision, a special attribute well developed in humans that provides the ability to accurately judge distance.

Whether the new fish represent a new family will entail DNA testing and a close examination of a specimen, says Pietsch, whose anglerfish work is currently funded by the National Science Foundation. Scientists have already described 18 different families of anglerfishes and this is probably a 19th, Pietsch says. Families are large groupings; for example, all dog species belong to the larger family that includes wolves, coyotes and hyenas.

Crawling fish may be part of new family

Yahoo News 4 Apr 08;

A University of Washington professor says a recently discovered fish that crawls instead of swimming and has forward-looking eyes like humans could be part of an entirely unknown family of fishes.

The creature sighted in Indonesian waters off Ambon Island has tan- and peach-colored zebra-stripping. It uses its leglike pectoral fins to burrow into cracks and crevices of coral reefs in search of food.

UW professor Ted Pietsch says this relative of the anglerfish will have to undergo DNA scrutiny to verify that it is unique. But the world's leading authority on anglerfish says he's never seen anything like it.

Pietsch says they have probably escaped notice until now because they are so good at sliding into narrow crevices.


Read more!

Report faults US bison slaughter program

Matthew Brown, Associated Press Yahoo News 3 Apr 08;

A new government report has faulted state and federal bureaucracies for failing to stop the slaughter of bison leaving Yellowstone National Park — even as the number of animals killed this year set a new record.

Nearly 1,400 park bison have been killed since February, under a 2000 federal-state agreement meant to prevent the spread of a livestock disease to cattle ranches surrounding the park. The bison are captured as they migrate to lower elevations in search of food.

The report, by the Government Accountability Office, sharply criticized federal and state agencies for failing to expand the area where bison can freely roam outside the park as called for in the 2000 agreement.

That lack of progress occurred despite almost $16 million spent on bison management since 2002.

The GAO report was requested by House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall, D-WV, and Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-NY. The congressmen released a copy of the report Wednesday.

"It's been clear for some time now that the current (bison management plan) is not working," Rahall said in a statement. "Both federal and state agencies could and should do much, much more to protect these magnificent animals while still safeguarding the cattle industry."

The impact on the park's bison population has been dramatic. This year's slaughter has driven the population down by more than a third, from 4,700 animals last summer to an estimated 3,000 in a count released last week.

However, the GAO report said the program had succeeded by at least one measure — keeping bison separate from cattle to prevent the transmission of brucellosis. The disease can cause pregnant animals to abort their young.

Officials with Yellowstone and the Montana Department of Livestock said they were reviewing the GAO report and did not have an immediate comment.


Read more!

Rare wild Cyprus donkey seen threatened

Reuters 2 Apr 08;

NICOSIA (Reuters) - Conservationists who found 10 wild donkeys shot dead in northern Cyprus said on Wednesday the rare breed could disappear entirely if hunters continued to shoot them for sport.

Environmentalists in the Karpas region believe many more of the brown donkeys had been killed since a 2003 study counted some 800 living in the wild.

"Hunters are shooting at them for fun and farmers are killing them because they damage their crops," said Dogan Sahir, head of the Turkish Cypriot branch of the Green Action Group.

The north Cyprus environmental ministry said a new count would be carried out in the wake of the killings.

Locals alerted Huseyin Yorganci, a local activist, to the hunting.

"There are many more out there, but we have only been able to reach ten by car," he told Reuters. "Locals phoned us and told us dead donkeys were being found in the area and warned that if we didn't act quickly there would soon be none left."

The donkeys normally shy away from human contact. The breed is believed to be unique because it has managed to survive in the wild unassisted by humans since escaping from owners hundreds of years ago.

(Reporting by Simon Bahceli, editing by Chloe Fussell)


Read more!

UK Marine reserves to reduce fishing area by 20%

Charles Clover, The Telegraph 3 Apr 08;

Up to 20 per cent of British waters could be closed to activities such as fishing and oil exploration to protect threatened species under a Bill due to be published in draft.

Research carried out for the Government by the University of Bangor shows that a network of reserves covering 14-20 per cent of British waters would be enough to protect declining species such as the angel shark, porbeagle and common skate.

The draft Bill will establish Marine Conservation Zones to protect Britain's marine wildlife where damaging activities, which could be as minor as the dropping of anchor chains on sea grass beds, will be controlled.

These will be overseen and enforced, not by Natural England as environmentalists are demanding, but by reformed sea fisheries committees which will be called Sea Fisheries and Conservation Authorities.

The Bill, which the Government has promised to introduce within the lifetime of this Parliament, will also introduce controversial measures to give public access to some of the third of the coastline in England where it does not yet exist.

The Marine Bill will apply to England, though devolved administrations in Wales and Scotland are expected to come up with their own versions.

The Welsh Assembly has already expressed interest in setting up a series of "no take" marine reserves.

Jean-Luc Solandt of the Marine Conservation Society said that the Bill was unlikely to provide sufficient powers to prohibit damaging activities such as scallop-dredging from sensitive areas.

He said: "We fear the proposals set out in the draft Bill will only repeat the errors of the past, with Government allowing short-term commercial interests to compromise much-needed long-term protection and sustainability."

Sharon Thompson of the RSPB said: "We are gravely concerned that in reality all we will get is a rehash of the current, ineffective legislation."

"There are three things we are looking for in the Draft Bill to reassure us these new Zones will work.

"First, the UK Government must commit time, money and effort to surveying our seas so we can identify those areas that need protecting.

"Second, Zones should be identified and designated where survey data says they are needed.

"Experience has shown that when the decision to designate is swayed by economic or other factors, the environmental value of the area becomes an afterthought or inconvenience.

"Last, it has to be clear who is responsible for protecting these zones and that they have the powers to improve them where necessary.

"There have to be serious and enforceable penalties for damaging them."

"Without all that, we will be no better off than we are now."


Read more!

The great carbon con: Can offsetting really help to save the planet?

Sophie Morris, The Independent 3 Apr 08;

It all started with Sting, this fad for owning one's very own patch of tropical rainforest, though it is probably unfair to blame him entirely for creating the boom industry that buying up forests piecemeal has become.

It is 20 years since the musician first set foot in Brazil and pledged to fight the cause of the Yanomami Indians, setting up the Rainforest Foundation to protect forests and their indigenous inhabitants.

Today, protecting forests has acquired a more international purpose. Climate change, rather than assuring the livelihoods of local people, has become the issue. Celebrities and politicians, and many others just in search of a quick buck, are falling over each other to advocate plant-a-tree conservationism as a salve to global warming.

Sienna Miller, Tony Blair, Josh Hartnett, Desmond Tutu and Prince Charles all endorse Global Cool, an initiative that encourages individuals to reduce their carbon emissions by, among other things, buying a "tonne of cool". David Cameron has proudly owned up to offsetting any flights he takes by making a donation to Climate Care, which calculates the cost of the carbon your flight has pumped out and does good stuff, like planting trees, to right the wrong. Sir David Attenborough is a patron of the World Land Trust, which is currently offering to "save a whole acre in perpetuity", for just £50.

However, critics say that there can be no ultimate guarantee of the future of any piece of land.

The wealthy financier Johan Eliasch, who advises Gordon Brown on deforestation and green energy, provoked the ire of the Brazilian government with his purchase, in 2006, of 400,000 acres of Amazon rainforest. "The Amazon is not for sale," said the Brazilian President, Lula da Silva. Eliasch then joined forces with Frank Field MP, and launched a grand tree-buying plan called Cool Earth late last year.

Cool Earth stresses that it "leases" rather than buys land, to keep it safe from eager logging companies. Its website explains that saving one acre of endangered rainforest keeps 260 tonnes of carbon safely "locked up" within the forest itself, unable to escape and pollute the atmosphere.

Whoever owns the land or the trees, this method of "capturing" or "locking" carbon into forests is not going to have the knock-on effect of saving the planet. Cool Earth does not claim explicitly to be in the offsetting game, but the carbon that it claims can be "locked up" in one acre of forest would offset 30 round-trips to Rio de Janeiro, say. For the environmental groups Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, this forestry offsetting craze is acting as a smokescreen, and detracting from real solutions to escalating emissions.

"Taking a dodgy accounting proposition, which is that you can somehow identify the amount of carbon that any given new bit of forest picks up out of the atmosphere and sequesters, and make that correspond somehow to emissions elsewhere," is how Greenpeace sees carbon offsetting, according to its senior climate adviser Charlie Kronick. "It can't be done. The methodology is poor, and the logic isn't very good either. Once the carbon you've put in from fossil fuels is up there, nothing is going to make it go away."

Friends of the Earth's Marie Reynolds points out that not only is offsetting no substitute for real emissions cuts, but there is no guarantee, when you plant a tree, what the future of that tree will be. Robin Oakley, Greenpeace's climate and energy campaigner, agrees: "The issue with offsetting is that, fundamentally, it doesn't undo the damage done by carbon pollution. The vast number of players in the offsetting market are not reducing emissions in any accountable or measurable way."

In some cases, local people, far from benefiting, suffer when huge new plantations spring up. Survival International campaigner David Hill says: "Numerous reports show how indigenous peoples have suffered as a result of carbon projects: invasion of their land, evictions, the destruction of villages and crops, reduced access to or destruction of traditional resources, and violent conflict."

Offsetting is popular because it makes people feel much better about taking long-haul flights or driving gas-guzzling vehicles. "They are being misled," says Oakley. "Most carbon offsetting companies are making a killing." Climate Care, the company David Cameron pays his green-guilt tax to, has recently been bought by the investment bank J P Morgan. In the credit-crunch climate, any new acquisitions are thought through very carefully, and only the most watertight pass muster. This move suggests that carbon offsetting is currently considered one of the most risk-free industries around.

Very few not-for-profit offsetting companies exist. Myclimate is one, and only uses "Gold Standard" offsets, a strict set of criteria for measuring where the money is going, drawn up by a number of international campaigning organisations. Since last year's conference in Bali to discuss how to take climate-change proposals past the Kyoto Protocol agreement, the Environment Secretary Hilary Benn has been working on a certification system to keep carbon cowboys out of the market. Redd – reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation – is the UN's proposed trading mechanism, which aims to pay countries not to cut down their forests.

"Turning the forest into just another commodity is not going to protect the climate or the lives of the people who live there," says Kronick. Surprisingly, perhaps, Greenpeace is in favour of extracting value from forests in other ways, such as the deal that was recently hammered out between Guyana and Canopy Capital, a group of British financiers to protect the Iwokrama Forest last week. The Independent first reported a plea from the Guyanan President, Bharrat Jagdeo, last November, to structure exactly this type of deal for all of Guyana's forests.

Michael Woods, a partner in the law firm Stephenson Harwood and head of its environment department, oversaw the deal. "It focuses on eco-systems services and the value a forest provides," he explains. "Rainfall is the best example. Without the trees, the eco-system will not produce the rainfall that then benefits other parts of South America, even as far as the American Midwest. It's a global utility service on which agriculture relies, and its value should be recognised."

However, this sort of protectoral behaviour, especially when overseen by foreign advisers, provokes worried disapproval from many green corners, giving rise to cries of neo- or eco-colonialism. "If there's going to be financial compensation for eco-systems services, which recognises that they provide a service other than locking up carbon, it should be for the people who live in those forests," says Kronick. "How do they get a share of the proceeds? How do you preserve national sovereignty, so that under the banner of climate change it doesn't become a kind of eco-colonialism?"

"This is not about buying land or trees," says Andrew Mitchell, a director of Canopy Capital and an experienced conservationist. "It is about trying to put a new value on forests for countries such as Guyana that are not destroying their forests. We need a new economic paradigm that values them, so that there's more of an incentive to leave them standing than cutting them down."

This sort of deal is in its infancy. It is described by climate-change specialists as "avoided deforestation", and similar projects should be rolled out in the next phase of the Kyoto Protocol. Other countries are already envious of Guyana's pioneering deal. Indonesia, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and the Democratic Republic of Congo would all benefit massively from similar arrangements.

Despite the potential quagmires over forest ownership, Greenpeace is in favour, because safe-guarding a forest, as well as ensuring the livelihoods of its inhabitants, has a real effect on climate change. "It is like sticking a cork in an industrial process," says Kronick. "It is taking one of the sources of climate change – deforestation accounts for up to 30 per cent of total carbon emissions in the atmosphere – and removing it.

"It must be a part of whatever solutions we come up with for climate change. Protecting forests is one of the smartest things that we can do."

Alternatives to offsetting

The people who live in forests are the first to be hit by their destruction. Survival International and the Forest Peoples Programme help indigenous communities to protect their rights to manage and control their own habitat. www.survival-international.org www.forestpeoples.org

Rather than "buying your cool" (carbon emissions) back from suspect sources, Global Cool has suggestions for reducing emissions in real terms: turn the heating down; switch appliances off at the mains; use an energy supplier that invests in renewables

www.globalcool.org

Don't forget that conserving forests (as long as they're not ring-fenced and the local people pushed out) is a good thing, and lots of organisations who have jumped on the offsetting bandwagon started out in straightforward conservation. The Woodland Trust estimates that, for a £2.75 monthly membership fee, it can "protect and care for" half an acre of native woodland. They won't sell you areas of woodland, but you can have spaces dedicated to a loved one. As there is no major problem with deforestation in the UK, this saves ancient woodland, but it won't stop climate change.

www.woodland-trust.org.uk

You could still pay for offsets, but check you are giving your money to a not-for-profit organisation that is selling Gold Standard carbon offsets, such as myclimate. Don't expect your money to save trees; most of the Gold Standard projects involve switching communities from fossil fuel to other types of power.

www.myclimate.org


Read more!

$20-Million Prize for Renewable Ocean Energy Announced

Christine Dell'Amore, National Geographic News 2 Apr 08;

Scotland will offer the world's largest prize to date for spurring advances in marine renewable energy, the country's head of state announced today. (Watch video.)

The Saltire Prize, of 20 million U.S. dollars, will go to innovators from any nation who design environmentally friendly ocean technology, such as better ways to harness tidal and wind power.

"This will ensure Scotland will be at the forefront of the battle against climate change and the move toward a new energy era," Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond told an audience at the National Geographic Society headquarters in Washington, D.C.

The competitors will demonstrate their inventions in Scotland.

Prize "Golden Age"

A new "golden age" in challenge prizes has inspired some of the most significant innovations in modern history, Salmond said.

For instance, the Ansari X-Prize for breakthroughs in human spaceflight saw a 200-U.S-million-dollar return in research and development on a 10-million-U.S.-dollar prize fund.

Salmond wanted to concentrate Scotland's marine-energy prize on where it might do the most good, he told National Geographic News.

"[We made a] decision to target an aspect of renewables that on one hand has amazing potential but is still in its infancy," he said.

"Looking at this array of prizes, renewables require an impetus, and this will electrify the renewables community and spur them on to greater effort."

The country of five million also has natural resources "unrivaled" across Europe, such as 25 percent of the continent's offshore wind resources and 10 percent of its wave potential, Salmond said.

Most Pressing Issue

The push for renewables comes in response to the looming threat of climate change, "the single most pressing issue facing the planet," Salmond said at the announcement.

A huge glacier the size of Connecticut that broke free from the Antarctic ice shelf last month is only the latest warning sign, he added.

Terry Garcia, executive vice president for mission programs for the National Geographic Society, is one of the first two members of the Saltire prize committee.

"This award is designed to encourage the development of technology that could make a significant impact in our effort to control climate change," Garcia told National Geographic News.

Renewable energy, unlike fossil fuels, does not produce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.

Scotland has vowed to reduce its greenhouse gases by 50 percent by 2050 and to run its country on at least 30 percent renewables by 2011, Salmond said.

The country has made inroads: Sixteen percent of its energy already comes from alternative sources.

Even more remote communities, such as Eday Island, part of the Orkney Islands, are 95 percent reliant on homegrown energy.

Costly Endeavor

But Salmond acknowledged that Scotland "lags behind" other European countries in making this new energy boom accessible to its population.

He also pointed out that renewable energy can be costly to jumpstart.

That's why he advocates a "mass deployment" strategy for renewables—for example, installing several wind-energy projects at once will help make such projects viable, he said.

Now is the time to make that technological leap that would usually take a generation and accomplish it in five or ten years, he added.

"By maximizing our own potential we can provide a scientific research boost for the whole of humankind."

More details about the selection process will be provided on November 30, 2008, at an announcement at Edinburgh Castle in Scotland.


Read more!

Microcredit Raises Hopes For India's Farm Widows

Krittivas Mukherjee, PlanetArk 3 Apr 08;

SUNNA, India - Savita Jiddewar is a rare success story on the cotton fields of central India, the epicentre of an agrarian crisis that has seen 150,000 farmers commit suicide since 1997 because they could not pay back loans.

Her home stands out strikingly in this small village of dirt lanes and pale blue brick houses. She has a television set, a DVD player and a comfortable sofa. A mobile phone rings intermittently and the aroma of cooking wafts from the kitchen.

Clearly, she is well off in a farming village where most people struggle to make ends meet and where at least four people have killed themselves unable to repay crop loans.

While her neighbours borrowed heavily, entangling themselves in a never-ending cycle of debts, Jiddewar, a widow whose husband and daughter died in a road accident, made her moves smartly.

She joined a microcredit programme last year, saving tiny amounts that she ploughed back into her cotton fields, and earning a life of relative comfort.

After the agrarian crisis broke out in the early 1990s when India began privatising its economy, several voluntary organisations and banks in the region began microcredit schemes for women.

But women are only now joining in large numbers and the benefits are showing.

"Initially I wasn't sure what this is all about but then I saw other women who were doing well," Jiddewar said as she walked around her village, the air heavy with the smell of cow dung and animal feed.


BUSINESS ACUMEN

Jiddewar then joined the Annapurna women's self help group, one of around 60,000 such groups in the region known as Vidarbha. Here, the microcredit model is benefiting some 500,000 women and widows of farmers.

A farmers' lobby in the area estimates there are about 20,000 widows in Vidarbha whose husbands committed suicide after crops failed and they could not pay moneylenders and banks.

The women form groups of 10 or 12 to start a business and approach a bank for tiny credits. The banks encourage the women to save with them, with each member depositing amounts starting from $1 every month.

The next loan to the group depends on how fast they repay the initial credit after making a saving.

There are a variety of banks offering microcredit and the women are careful not to choose the wrong option.

Jiddewar's group chose the one that gave them $2,500 for community farming. Within months of borrowing her group had managed to pay back half the amount. Now the group is considering setting up a stationery shop.

Once left without hope after their sons and husbands died, many windows are picking up the pieces again.

"There was a time when we didn't know where the next meal was going to come from," said Mirabai Shyamrao Martawar, whose husband killed himself by jumping into a river after moneylenders pestered him for payment.

"Now I save fifty rupees (a little over $1) every month after providing for 10 members in the family."

The women are into a variety of businesses such as goat farming, community farming, running corner shops, bamboo handicrafts and glue making.

Without an income, life for these women and their children was a constant struggle for survival. Young widows were particularly vulnerable.

"This is a revolution," said Manoj Bhoir, whose voluntary group Village Development and Education Society facilitates microcredit for 650 self help groups.

"These women are determined to repay not only the debts of their families but also provide a better life for their children."

In many cases widows were thrown out by their in-laws. Only a small number were given $2,500 in compensation by the government after proving their husbands committed suicide.

But there is criticism as well of the microcredit model in Vidarbha. Although defaults are almost nil, many women are repeat borrowers and have become dependent on loans for household expenditures rather than capital investments.

But for tens of thousands of women in Vidarbha, microcredit seems their best chance of breaking from a life of debt.

"In a group we are safe," said Martawar. "When one is in trouble the others will come forward to help."

(Editing by Simon Denyer and Megan Goldin)


Read more!

Installed US wind power rose 45 percent last year

Reuters 2 Apr 08;

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Installed U.S. wind energy capacity grew nearly 45 percent last year to 16,800 megawatts, or about enough to serve 4.5 million homes, as interest in low-carbon power grew, an industry group said on Wednesday.

Texas remained the top state in both total wind power capacity, which reached with 4,446 MW, and new wind power capacity, the annual report from the American Wind Energy Association said.

The two largest wind projects were both in Texas: Horse Hollow, owned by FPL Energy, a unit of FPL Group, and Sweetwater, owned by Babcock & Brown and Catamount.

Wind power remained the most common source of new installed electricity after natural gas. Some U.S. utilities increased investments in renewable power generation as the country moved closer to regulating greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, much of which is generated by coal-fired power plants.

AWEA spokeswoman Christine Real de Azua said a U.S. incentive known as the production tax credit also helped the industry grow last year. The PTC is set to expire at the end of the year and wind backers hope Congress will renew it to ensure solid growth in coming years.

"With the right public policy, (wind) will be a growing and affordable part of our long term plans," said Dick Kelly, the president and CEO of Xcel Energy Inc. In 2007, Xcel was the U.S. utility with the most wind power on it system for the third year running, with 2,635 MW, the report said.

While wind power growth soared last year, the industry has also faced challenges recently. The Texas electric grid operator had to briefly cut power service to industrial customers in late February when the wind in the state stopped blowing. While the industry said improvements in forecasting would help smooth electricity delivery going forward, the matter focused attention on the intermittent nature of wind power.

In Wednesday's report, the state of California came in second in the category of total installed wind capacity, with 2,439 MW, Minnesota was third with 1,299 MW, and Iowa was fourth with 1,271 MW. Iowa

The largest manufacturer of turbines installed in the United States last year was GE Energy, with 1,560 turbines, while Denmark's Vestas provided 537 turbines and Siemens provided 375.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Christian Wiessner)


Read more!

Climate solutions seen harming indigenous peoples

Alister Doyle, Reuters 2 Apr 08;

OSLO (Reuters) - Large-scale solutions to help slow global warming often threaten the very indigenous peoples who are among those hardest hit by a changing climate, the U.N. University said on Wednesday.

Biofuel plantations, construction of hydropower dams and measures to protect forests, where trees soak up heat-trapping carbon dioxide gas as they grow, can create conflicts with the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples.

"Biofuel production, renewable energy expansion (and) other mitigation measures (are) uprooting indigenous peoples in many regions," the U.N. University said in a statement on a report released at a conference in Darwin, Australia.

"Indigenous people point to an increase in human rights violations, displacements and conflicts due to expropriation of ancestral lands and forests for biofuel plantations -- soya, sugar cane, jatropha, oil-palm, corn, etc," it said.

It said the world's estimated 370 million indigenous peoples, from the Arctic to South Pacific islands, were already exposed on the front line of climate change to more frequent floods, droughts, desertification, disease and rising seas.

"Indigenous people have done least to cause climate change and now the solutions ... are causing more problems for them," said Victoria Tauli-Corpuz from the Philippines, who heads the U.N. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

Tauli-Corpuz, who also represents the Igorot people, told Reuters that 500,000 indigenous people in the Philippines were suffering from an expansion of biofuel plantations.

Millions more in Malaysia and Indonesia were affected by plantations, she said in a telephone interview. And in Brazil, forests were being cleared to make way for soya and sugar cane.

The U.N. University study said the Ugandan Wildlife Authority had forced people to move from their homes in 2002 when 7,000 hectares (17,300 acres) of land was planted as forests to soak up greenhouse gases.

Zakri said indigenous peoples' lifestyles produced none of the greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels in power plants, factories and cars that are blamed for stoking global warming.

By contrast, the United States, with about 300 million people, contributed almost a quarter of world emissions.

Indigenous peoples "have not benefited, in any significant manner, from climate change-related funding ... nor from emissions trading schemes," A.H. Zakri, head of the U.N. University's Institute of Advanced Studies, said in a statement.

The study said indigenous peoples were exploiting traditional knowledge to help offset climate change.

In northern Australia, Aborigines were getting aid to set small fires after rains that help renew the soil and create fire breaks to reduce risks of giant wildfires in the dry season.

"This is fire abatement that reduces greenhouse gas emissions from wildfires," said Joe Morrison, head of the North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance.

The deal involves funding from ConocoPhillips, which runs a plant processing natural gas from the Timor Sea.

(Editing by Mary Gabriel)

Indigenous peoples hardest hit by climate change describe impacts
EurekAlert 2 Apr 08;

Biofuel production, renewable energy expansion, other mitigation measures uprooting indigenous peoples in many regions

Indigenous peoples have contributed the least to world greenhouse gas emissions and have the smallest ecological footprints on Earth. Yet they suffer the worst impacts not only of climate change, but also from some of the international mitigation measures being taken, according to organizers of a United Nations University co-hosted meeting April 3 in Darwin, Australia.

Impacts of climate change on indigenous people worldwide include:

* In tropical and sub-tropical areas, an increase in diseases associated with higher temperatures and vector-borne and water-borne diseases like cholera, malaria and dengue fever;

* Worsening drought conditions and desertification, leading to more forest fires that disrupt subsistence agriculture, hunting and gathering livelihoods, as well as serious biodiversity loss;

* Distinct changes in the seasonal appearance of birds, the blooming of flowers, etc. These now occur earlier or are decoupled from the customary season or weather patterns;

* In arid and semi-arid lands: excessive rainfall and prolonged droughts, resulting in dust storms that damage grasslands, seedlings, other crops and livestock;

* In the Arctic, stronger waves, thawing permafrost and melting mountain glaciers and sea-ice, bringing coastal and riverbank erosion;

* Smaller animal populations and the introduction of new marine species due to changing animal travel and migration routes;

* In Boreal Forests, new types of insects and longer-living endemic insects (e.g. spruce beetles) that destroy trees and other vegetation;

* In coastal regions and small-island states, erosion, stronger hurricanes and typhoons, leading to the loss of freshwater supplies, land, mangrove forests and dislocation (environmental refugees);

* Increasing food insecurity due to declining fish populations and coral bleaching;

* Crop damaging pest infestations (e.g. locusts, rats, spruce beetles, etc.), and increasing food costs due to competition with the demand for biofuels;

* Extreme and unprecedented cold spells resulting in health problems (e.g. hypothermia, bronchitis, and pneumonia, especially for the old and young).

As well, indigenous people point to an increase in human rights violations, displacements and conflicts due to expropriation of ancestral lands and forests for biofuel plantations (soya, sugar-cane, jatropha, oil-palm, corn, etc.), as well as for carbon sink and renewable energy projects (hydropower dams, geothermal plants), without the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous people.

Specific instances of indigenous people being harmed by climate change mitigation measures include the case of a Dutch company whose operations include planting trees and selling sequestered carbon credit to people wanting to offset their emissions caused by air travel. In March 2002, its project was certified by the Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) and from 1999 to 2002 over 7,000 hectares of land were planted in Uganda.

The Ugandan Wildlife Authority (UWA), responsible for managing all national parks, forced indigenous people to leave the area. Forced evictions continued to 2002, leading indigenous people to move to neighboring villages, caves and mosques. Over 50 people were killed in 2004.

Meanwhile, indigenous peoples in Malaysia and Indonesia have been uprooted by the aggressive expansion of oil palm plantations for biofuel production. Likewise, nuclear waste sites and hydroelectric dam-building displace indigenous peoples from their ancestral territories.

Participants in Darwin, Australia will hear first hand the impact of climate change on indigenous peoples and how they are adapting to a warming world. They will also explore factors that facilitate or obstruct the participation of indigenous peoples in international processes and deliberations related to reducing emissions and emissions trading.

Entitled the International Expert Meeting on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples, the event is being organized by UNU’s Japan-based Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) in conjunction with the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNFII) and the North Australia Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance (NAILSMA).

(Papers / documentation are available online at www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/EGM_CS08.html)

Specific objectives of the meeting:

* Exchange information on the effects of climate change;

* Draw attention to the impact of climate change on indigenous peoples, their livelihoods, cultural practices and lands and natural resources;

* Identify options and advance plans to address migration and many other issues faced by indigenous peoples due to climate change;

* Identify international institutions interested in partnership with indigenous peoples;

* Highlight good practice models; and

* Identify information gaps and prescribe a way forward.

The meeting’s final report will be to be submitted to the seventh session of the UNPFII.

“Indigenous peoples regard themselves as the mercury in the world’s climate change barometer,” says UNU-IAS Director A.H. Zakri. “They have not benefited, in any significant manner, from climate change-related funding, whether for adaptation and mitigation, nor from emissions trading schemes. The mitigation measures for climate change are very much market-driven and the non-market measures have not been given much attention. We hope this meeting will help address that imbalance.”

Adds Dr. Zakri: “Most indigenous peoples practice sustainable carbon neutral lives or even carbon negative life ways which has sustained them over thousands of years.

“There are at least 370 million indigenous people throughout the world living relatively neutral or even carbon negative life styles. While not a large number when compared to the world population of 6 billion, it does have a substantial impact in lowering emissions. Compare this to the impact of the United States, with a population of 300 million -- only 4% of the world’s population – but responsible for about 25 percent of world greenhouse gas emissions.”

The meeting will also hear how indigenous people are adapting to changing climate conditions.

In Bangladesh, for example, villagers are creating floating vegetable gardens to protect their livelihoods from flooding. In Vietnam, communities are helping to plant dense mangroves along the coast to diffuse tropical-storm waves.

Additional background follows.

A brief overview of climate change effects on indigenous people:

Africa

There are 2.5 million kilometers of dunes in southern Africa covered in vegetation and used for grazing. However the rise in temperatures and the expected dune expansion, along with increased wind speeds, will result in the region losing most of its vegetation cover and become less viable for indigenous peoples living in the region.

As their traditional resource base diminishes, traditional practices of cattle and goat farming will disappear. There are already areas where indigenous peoples are forced to live around government-drilled bores for water and depend on government support for their survival. Deteriorating food security is a major issue for indigenous peoples residing in these drylands.

Asia

In Asia’s tropical rainforests, a haven for biodiversity, as well as indigenous peoples’ cultural diversity, temperatures are expected to rise 2 to 8 degrees Celsius, rainfall may decrease, prompting crop failures and forest fires.

People in low-lying areas of Bangladesh could be displaced by a one-meter rise in sea levels. Such a rise could also threaten the coastal zones of Japan and China. The impact will mean that salt water could intrude on inland rivers, threatening some fresh water supplies.

In the Himalayas high altitude regions, glacial melts affect hundreds of millions of rural dwellers who depend on the seasonal flow of water. There might be more water short term but less long term as glaciers and snow cover shrink.

The poor, many of whom are indigenous peoples, are highly vulnerable to climate change in urban areas because of their limited access to profitable livelihood opportunities and will be exposed to more flood and other climate-related risks in areas where they are forced to live.

Central and South America and the Caribbean

This very diverse region ranges from the Chilean deserts to the tropical rainforests of Brazil and Ecuador, to the high altitudes of the Peruvian Andes.

As elsewhere, indigenous peoples’ use of biodiversity is central to environmental management and livelihoods. In the Andes, alpine warming and deforestation threaten access to plants and crops for food, medicine, grazing animals and hunting.

Earth’s warming surface is forcing indigenous peoples in this region to farm at higher altitudes to grow their staple crops, which adds to deforestation. Not only does this affect water sources and leads to soil erosion, it also has a cultural impact. The uprooting of Andean indigenous people to higher lands puts their cultural survival at risk.

In Ecuador, unexpected frosts and long droughts affect all farming activities. The older generation says they no longer know when to sow because rain does not come as expected. Migration offers one way out but represents a cultural threat.

In the Amazon, the effects of climate change will include deforestation and forest fragmentation and, as a result, more carbon released into the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change. The droughts of 2005 resulted in western Amazon fires, which are likely to recur as rainforest is replaced by savannas, severely affecting the livelihoods of the region’s indigenous peoples.

Coastal Caribbean communities are often the center of government activities, ports and international airports. Rapid and unplanned movements of rural and outer island indigenous residents to the major centers is underway, putting pressure on urban resources, creating social and economic stresses, and increasing vulnerability to hazardous weather conditions such as cyclones and diseases.

The relationship between climate change and water security will be a major issue in the Caribbean, where many countries are dependant on rainfall and groundwater.

Arctic

The polar regions are now experiencing some of Earth’s most rapid and severe climate change. Indigenous peoples, their culture and the whole ecosystem that they interact with is very much dependent on the cold and the extreme physical conditions of the Arctic region.

Indigenous peoples depend on polar bears, walrus, seals and caribou, herding reindeer, fishing and gathering not only for food and to support the local economy, but also as the basis for their cultural and social identity. Among concerns facing indigenous peoples: availability of traditional food sources, growing difficulty with weather prediction and travel safety in changing ice and weather conditions.

According to indigenous peoples, sea ice is less stable, unusual weather patterns are occurring, vegetation cover is changing, and particular animals are no longer found in traditional hunting areas. Local landscapes, seascapes and icescapes are becoming unfamiliar.

Peoples across the Arctic region report changes in the timing, length and character of the seasons, including more rain in autumn and winter and more extreme heat in summer. In several Alaskan villages, entire indigenous communities may have to relocate due to thawing permafrost and large waves slamming against the west and northern shores. Coastal indigenous communities are severely threatened by storm-related erosion due to melting sea ice. Up to 80% of Alaskan communities, comprised mainly of indigenous peoples, are vulnerable to either coastal or river erosion.

In Nunavut, elders can longer predict the weather using their traditional knowledge. Many important summer hunting grounds cannot be reached. Drying and smoking foods is more difficult due to summer heat undermining the storage of traditional foods for the winter.

In Finland, Norway and Sweden, rain and mild winter weather often prevents reindeer from accessing lichen, a vital food source, forcing many herders to feed their reindeer with fodder, which is expensive and not economically viable long term. For Saami communities, reindeers are vital to their culture, subsistence and economy.

Central and Eastern Europe, Russian Federation, Central Asia and Trans-Caucasia

Survival of indigenous peoples, who depend on fishing, hunting and agriculture, also depends on the success of their fragile environment and its resources. As bears and other wild game disappear, people in local villages will suffer particular hardships. Worse, unique indigenous cultures, traditions and languages will face major challenges maintaining their diversity.

Indigenous peoples have noticed the arrival of new plant species that thrive in rivers and lakes, including the small flowered duckweed which has made survival difficult for fish. New bird species have also arrived and birds now stay longer than before.

Changes in reindeer migration and foraging patterns, sparked by fluctuating weather patterns, cause problems also in this region, whose indigenous people have witnessed unpredictable and unstable weather and shorter winters.

North America

About 1.2 million North American tribal members live on or near reservations, and many pursue lifestyles with a mix of traditional subsistence activities and wage labour. Many reservation economies and budgets of indigenous governments depend heavily on agriculture, forest products and tourism.

Global warming is predicted to cause less snowfall and more droughts in many parts of North America, which will have a significant impact on indigenous peoples. Water resources and water quality may decrease while extended heat waves will increase evaporation and deplete underground water resources. There may be impacts on health, plant cover, wildlife populations, tribal water rights and individual agricultural operations, and a reduction of tribal services due to decrease in income from land leases.

Natural disasters such as blizzards, ice storms, floods, electric power outages, transportation problems, fuel depletion and food supply shortages will isolate indigenous communities.

Higher temperatures will result in the loss of native grass and medicinal plants, as well as erosion that allows the invasion of non-native plants. The zones of semi-arid and desert shrubs, cactus, and sagebrush will move northward. Finally, fire frequency could also increase with more fuel and lightning strikes, degrading the land and reducing regional bio-diversity.

Pacific

Most of the Pacific region comprises small island states affected by rising sea levels. Environmental changes are prominent on islands where volcanoes build and erode; coral atolls submerge and reappear and the islands’ biodiversity is in flux. The region has suffered extensively from human disasters such as nuclear testing, pollution, hazardous chemicals and wastes like Persistent Organic Pollutants, and solid waste management and disposal.

High tides flood causeways linking villages. This has been particularly noticeable in Kiribati and a number of other small Pacific island nations that could be submerged in this century.

Migration will become a major issue. For example, the people of Papua New Guinea’s Bougainville atoll island of Cartaret have asked to be moved to higher ground on the mainland. The people of Sikaiana Atoll in the Solomon Islands have been migrating primarily to Honiara, the capital. There has been internal migration from the outer islands of Tuvalu to the capital Funafuti. Almost half of Tuvalu’s population now resides on the Funafuti atoll, with negative environmental consequences, including increased demand on local resources.

Warmer temperatures have led to the bleaching of the Pacific Island ’s main source of survival – the coral reefs. The algae that help feed coral is loosened and, because the algae give them colour, the starved corals look pale. Continued bleaching ultimately kills corals. Coral reefs are an important shelter for organisms and the reduction of reef-building corals is likely to have a major impact on biodiversity. Tropical fishery yields are on the decline worldwide and it is now clear that the conditions may become critical for the local fish population.

Agriculture in the Pacific region, especially in small island states, is becoming increasingly vulnerable due to heat stress on plants and saltwater incursions. Hence, food security is of great concern to the region.

###

UNU Institute of Advanced Studies

The Institute of Advanced Studies is part of the United Nations University’s global network of research and training centres. IAS undertakes research and postgraduate education on leading sustainable development issues, convening expertise from disciplines such as economics, law, biology, political science, physics and chemistry to better understand and contribute creative solutions to pressing global concerns. UNU-IAS works to identify and address strategic issues of concern for all humankind, for governments and decision makers and, particularly, for developing countries.

United Nations University

Established by the U.N. General Assembly, UNU is an international community of scholars engaged in research, advanced training and the dissemination of knowledge related to pressing global problems. Activities focus mainly on peace and conflict resolution, sustainable development and the use of science and technology to advance human welfare. The University operates a worldwide network of research and post-graduate training centres, with headquarters in Tokyo.


Read more!