Scientific model maps coral reefs' status

United Press International 21 Apr 08;

NEW YORK, April 21 (UPI) -- U.S. and Dutch researchers have created a scientific model that can map where coral reefs are in the most trouble and where they can best be protected.

Scientists with the Wildlife Conservation Society in New York and the International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation in the Netherlands said the model synthesizes several ocean conditions, including photosynthetic and ultraviolet light, and factors them into previous reports of coral stress or bleaching. The data are then used to map the distribution of inhospitable conditions.

The researchers found much of the northern Indian Ocean contains very stressful environments for corals, with areas of the Maldives and the Seychelles falling in the middle of the most severe conditions. The least stressed reefs have been found in an area east and just north of Madagascar.

"Despite the large areas in high and severe stress, the model suggests that there are some reefs with less stressful conditions and more reasons for hope," said Wildlife Conservation Society researcher Timothy McClanahan, one of the study's authors.

The model was detailed in a recent issue of the journal Ecological Modeling.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 22 Apr 08


Coral spawning at Pulau Hantu
join the hantu bloggers on 24 Apr to collect data on this special event on our living reefs, on the hantu blog

Happy Earth Day
from the colourful clouds blog and the tidechaser blog

Naked Slugs of Singapore
some of our nudibranch are featured on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

Three full days of ADEX
on the ashira blog with haul of goodies

Naked Hermit Crabs on Rouge TV
clip for those who missed the show on the adventures of the naked hermit crabs blog and on the leafmonkey blog

Still bugged
gruesome bug burden on the budak blog

A cemetery in Penang: A birdwatcher’s paradise
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

A Truly “Green” Building Technology
on the reuters environment blog

Spurred by Rising Seas, Dubai's Floating Ambition
The Dutch are in Dubai to build floating towns on the npr blog



Read more!

Strategy in place on long-term water supply: PUB replyto Tekong-Ubin reservoir

Reply from PUB, Straits Times Forum 22 Apr 08;

PUB, the national water agency, thanks Mr Syu Ying Kwok for his letter last Friday, 'After Marina Barrage, Tekong-Ubin reservoir'. The waterway between Pulau Ubin, Pulau Tekong and the mainland is a major shipping lane and there are currently no plans to convert it into a reservoir.

Mr Syu can be assured that PUB has put in place a long-term strategy to ensure a diversified and sustainable supply of water for Singapore. This is known as the Four National Taps, which are water from local catchment, imported water, Newater and desalinated water.

While the Marina Barrage will create a new source of water supply, two other new freshwater lakes are also being developed by building dams across Sungei Punggol and Sungei Serangoon. By next year, these three new reservoirs will increase the water catchment area from half to two-thirds of Singapore's land area. Our third and fourth National Taps, Newater and desalinated water, are also important pillars of Singapore's water supply. Demand for Newater has grown strongly and the fifth and largest plant is now being built at Changi. Newater will be able to meet 30 per cent of Singapore's total water needs by 2011.

But ensuring a sufficient water supply is only half the battle. To provide water for all, PUB calls on all Singaporeans to play their part to conserve water, keep the environment clean to ensure clean water in our reservoirs, and build a relationship with water by enjoying our water resources. We can then have enough water for all uses.

Tan Yok Gin
Director, Policy and Planning
PUB

Comments on the Straits Times Forum in response to PUB's reply

#3 If Malaysia cuts off the supply, what is the chances we can survive?

Don't blame Malaysia. There is no reason why Malaysia wants to do that unless it faces severe water shortage itself. If it does, we can only blame ourselves for being unprepared. Fortunately water recovery technologies have improved by leaps and bound in the last 10 years. But all water processing requires energy. Energy is the key.

It is possible to recover rainwater even at local run-offs. A bungalow can trap all its water within its compound. Even blocks of HDB flats can recover water using a pond system. But these have not been seriously investigated in Singapore. Our polytechnic students now doing water processing and treatment courses can design projects to study them.
Posted by: SingaporePatient at Tue Apr 22 13:50:09 SGT 2008

If Malaysia cuts off the supply, what is the chances we can survive? Are we able to develop some recycle water usage with all household and industry? ie, save the used bath and washing water and go for simple filtering to remove odour than channel and contain for flashing. Thus allow each household to save on water bills.
Posted by: cjcjcjcj at Tue Apr 22 11:01:09 SGT 2008

Just exactly how long is "long term"? Also, with population growing with so many foreigners around, we should be looking at whether some of our critical resources, like water, can support this growth. Maybe the govt can have a higher water tax for non-singaporeans coz they are using up resources that belongs to Singaporeans.
Posted by: creativesti03 at Tue Apr 22 08:07:22 SGT 2008


Read more!

Tekong-Ubin reservoir not practical

Letter from Ivan Kwan Wei Ming, Straits Times Forum 22 Apr 08;

I REFER to Mr Syu Ying Kwok's letter on Friday, "After Marina Barrage, Tekong-Ubin reservoir". While the need for a constant supply of fresh water will no doubt be essential to Singapore's survival, I am afraid that the idea of connecting Pulau Ubin and Tekong to mainland Singapore to form a new reservoir is simply not feasible, and overlooks many important reasons which render it an untenable idea.

Construction of the Marina Barrage involved building a dam across the mouth of the Singapore River. Ideally, over time, the saltwater in the estuary will be flushed out, to be replaced by fresh water from further upstream. Mr Syu's letter already pointed out a major difficulty with replicating this scenario for a hypothetical Ubin-Tekong reservoir: damming up an area of sea with the aim of converting all that seawater to fresh water is simply not a sound idea, especially when there are few, if any, rivers to supply fresh water to the enclosed area.

Building pumps to pump out all the seawater will involve great costs, while the cheaper alternative, letting all the seawater evaporate naturally, will take years, if not decades, and will most likely result in a giant saline lake, which defeats the whole purpose of building a reservoir to store fresh water for human consumption. Dumping in large volumes of fresh water to dilute and flush out all the seawater would be self-defeating, especially since the amount of fresh water required would probably exceed the potential capacity of the reservoir.

When reclamation at Pulau Tekong has already become the subject of territorial disputes with Malaysia, and when the issue of Pedra Branca has yet to be resolved, proposing to build such a reservoir so close to international boundaries will surely not sit easily with our neighbours. The Malaysian authorities will be unhappy for another reason: Mr Syu failed to take into account the fact that the proposed reservoir would destroy an internationally important shipping lane. Ships travelling between Pasir Gudang, Sembawang Shipyard, and the rest of the world stand to lose an essential route if the area was dammed up. Are the economic and political risks worth it?

Because the area is currently subject to heavy maritime traffic, dredging is constantly being carried out, and there is also quite a high risk of pollution. What happens if the water in the reservoir gets contaminated? The area also sits right at the mouth of the Johor River, which in recent years has experienced heavy flooding during the December monsoons. There is the chance that heavy rains will wash a mixture of floodwaters and seawater right into the reservoir. And with a sea-level rise due to climate change, or occasional storm surges, there will always be the risk of seawater breaching the dams and infiltrating the reservoir. What are the costs involved in preparing against such occurrences, or in rectifying the situation if such contamination occurs?

Lastly, building such a reservoir will severely impact a number of ecologically significant nature areas that many have come to love. Places like Chek Jawa, Changi Beach and the Pasir Ris mangroves will all be lost forever if such a scheme is ever implemented. These sites, rich in biodiversity, are irreplaceable in terms of their value as part of our natural heritage, and have also become important places for leisure and recreation. Not to mention that damming up the sea will lead to massive die-offs of marine life as the salinity of the water changes, which will present a major pollution problem.

Ultimately, in lieu of all these other points, which the original letter failed to take into consideration, are the great costs involved in constructing and maintaining such a reservoir justified?

There are simply too many costs in return for attaining self-sufficiency in our water supply. We already possess technologies like desalination and reverse-osmosis which can help us achieve this objective, without the potential economic, political and ecological nightmare that would ensue if an Ubin-Tekong reservoir was built. While it is important that we foster an environment that is receptive to new ideas that will help us maintain our competitive edge, it would be advisable that people carry out more research into the viability of their ideas before voicing them out in public spaces like the Straits Times forum.

Comments on the Straits Times Forum page in response to Ivan Kwan's letter

Marina Bay will need two heavy monsoon to convert it into fresh water.
Posted by: PiePiePie at Tue Apr 22 15:31:16 SGT 2008

I disagree with Mr(s). Syu. His proposal, if realized, will be yet another catalyst for geopolitical tension between Malaysia and Singapore. The proposed reservoir will seal up the navigable channel of the eastern Johor Straits, effectively blocking access to Pasir Gudang Port. This will be a rallying point for more Singapore bashing. Mr. Syu also seems to advocating for the mass-destruction of coastal and island ecological systems of Pulau Ubin, Pulau Tekong and Changi. Hence I am not sure as to how exactly the carbon footprint of his proposal can be considered beneficial. In addition, using Marina Bay reservoir as a gauge, it will probably take far longer for the water in the proposed reservoir to be drinkable given the natural saline dilution approach Mr. Syu is suggesting(which is not really the approach used in creating the Marina reservoir) that . We may be looking at a timeframe in excess of 100 years. During this time, new technologies will probably arise to negate the rationale for Mr. Syu's idea. A more workable idea would be the conversion of Sungei Punggol and Sungei Serangoon into reservoirs. Mr. Syu's proposal is probably well-meaning but it inherently holds many negative points that will make it impossible for any rational policy-maker to accept it.
Posted by: asgard0211 at Tue Apr 22 15:07:09 SGT 2008

Re: Mr Syu's latest reply

1) Based on expert advise from people who work on the marina barrage, this is how it works: first you need to flush out all the salt water during low tide and then let let fresh water fill it up. However, this is not a one time process. It requires long period of time before the water is 100% consumable. While it's not consumable, we can only use it for non-portable uses. So yes, you MUST "pump" out all the water or at least be able to flush it out. You cannot have a single bit of salt water inside the reservoir before you can actually consume it. You don't need to build pumps as Mr Kwan suggested but you definitely must remove all water before introducing freshwater.

2) Those estuaries you mentioned are already going to be dammed up. Furthermore, would you want heavy industries and airports to form the catchment of which your water comes from? Chemicals and pollutants infiltrate through the ground and ends up in your waterbodies.

3) The straits of Johor does not belong to Singapore. There is an international boundary in the middle of the straits. Furthermore, the reason why the shipping lane is between Singapore-Ubin is because the channel there is deeper. Deep channels are required for ships to pass through. The Johor-Ubin waters are too shallow!

4) Would the economic and environmental cost for building the reservoir be even more than the carbon footprint of desalinization? What is more important?
Posted by: micamonkey at Tue Apr 22 14:58:14 SGT 2008

Tekong-Ubin reservoir is conceived as an idea to retain precious fresh water for Singapore’s future needs. I fully agreed that educating our people to save the precious little fresh water is one very important aspect for water independence. Yet even when everyone is able to use only as much as they need, Singapore still needs to find new source of water for our children and future generation, including you.

If build, water inside the Tekong Ubin reservoir will not be pump dry and fill with fresh water (this is silly and wasteful). Estuaries from the entire north east part of Singapore, including Tekong, Ubin Island and the entire Changi Airport area, will serve as a water catchment area. Fresh rain water from these areas will be diverted into this new reservoir.

This entire area easily represents more than 20% of land in Singapore and we have many man made canals and even other canals as source of fresh water. Fresh water from Sungei Pungol, Sungei Serangoon, Sungei Tampines and even Sungei Seletar can be diverted into this reservoir.

With our heavy annual rainfall, over time the inflow of fresh water will reduce the salinity of this reservoir until we have fresh consumable water.

Pedra Branca will be resolve over time. Singapore will let international law decide on areas of dispute. Our Malaysian neighbors will in the future realize that it will benefit more for both countries to work together. It is up to you and future generations of Singaporeans and Malaysians to work together.

The dams if built will be within our own territorial waters and connected to our own islands. Singapore is not a country that will infringe on others legal territory.

The water between Singapore, Tekong and Ubin belongs to Singapore, it is not international territory. Ships and boats can move in and out of Sembawang Shipyard and southern tip of Malaysia thru the passage way north of Tekong and Ubin Island. Maritime operations will not be hindered.

Unknown to many Singaporeans, Singapore has one of the best civil works authority in the world. The number of flooding incident in Singapore is so small that when it happens, it becomes a spectacle. Those with experience living in other low lying coastal city, like Jakarta and even Johore will tell you how luck we are. Thus I have utmost confidence on them to make it proper if such dams were to be built.

There is a very good reason why Singapore should pursue the less costly alternative for fresh water. Yes we have desalination plants and reverse-osmosis technology can be use to get fresh water. But these are costly methods because both are energy and resource intensive. For each litre of water from desalination plant, we will have to burn more fossil fuel in generating enough energy for desalination, thus we will put more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere indirectly.

To put it simply, the carbon foot print for each litre of water from desalination is many times more than that from a reservoir. Indirectly, Singapore will destroy more of mother nature using desalination.

The cost saving by using a reservoir, which will be very significant in the long run when compared to desalination, can be used to buy more land of virgin rain forest and will help even more on our efforts to save our planet.

Ultimately, Tekong Ubin reservoir is only a suggestion for our government to consider. Knowing our Government, a very extensive study will be done before a project like this, which is very large and complex is even considered. You must have faith in our Government to do the correct thing after weighing all the pros and cons. Chek Jawa would have been destroyed long ago if our Minister has not considered our people’s opinion. What ever the decision by our Government, Singaporean must also know that we must take collective interest of everyone and not just interest of our own.

Syu Ying Kwok.
Posted by: IIVII at Tue Apr 22 09:31:50 SGT 2008

For the unenlightened, pls read the article in micamonkey's post link.

Forum writers really should do basic information-gathering before launching into such fantastical spiels. How the writer got the idea, I really don't know. But a logical think-through would quickly result in the idea being shot down.

Environmental, political, technological and social factors were completely left out in the forum letter.
Posted by: flameback at Mon Apr 21 17:42:01 SGT 2008

moreover, damming the place up to store freshwater is not the solution to our problem. the solution lies in the education of the people - teach everyone to consume less!
Posted by: pricillaseah at Sat Apr 19 16:44:47 SGT 2008

and then what will happen to all the wildlife and biodiversity of the area? the corals, the forest-dwelling animals in Tekong and the mangroves that will need to salinity to survive? I urge the authorities to think twice, thrice, many many many times before making this decision, before they regret it later and spend even more money to restore the place to it's original state.
Posted by: pricillaseah at Sat Apr 19 16:44:02 SGT 2008

I totally agree with mbkho, What about the environmental impact?
All the remaining natural mangroves in Pasir Ris Park and along Sungei Serangoon will be destroyed due to the new freshwater conditions. What about the beaches along Pasir Ris and Changi? The patch of beach forest along Changi, which is adapted to shoreline conditions will be affected. SO much of our nature is at stake. I don't think this is should be implemented.
Posted by: JuzKeiko at Sat Apr 19 14:39:43 SGT 2008


Read more!

Remember, it's Earth Day

Straits Times 22 Apr 08;

This back lane in Boat Quay gives an idea of Singaporeans' penchant for air-conditioning. Air-cons account for the lion's share of electricity consumed in buildings - up to 55 per cent of a building's energy usage. Although air-conditioners are the biggest energy wasters, they also have the largest potential for savings. By makingadjustments, somebuildings can even halve their energy bills.

To do your part on Earth Day today, here are some energy-saving tips from the National Climate Change Committee.

# Avoid placing heat-generating appliances near the thermostat, which may cause the air-conditioning unit to operate longer than necessary.

# The ideal indoor thermostat setting is 25 deg C.

# Dirty air filters impede airflow, leading to increased energy consumption. Clean air filters once a month or replace them when necessary.

# Regularly service your air-conditioning units.

# Direct sunlight on the air-conditioning unit's outdoor heat exchanger decreases its efficiency. Consider shading the air-conditioner where necessary, but do not block the airflow.


Read more!

Richer harvest for Garden City Fund: Over $2m last year

Donations to NParks for green causes up from under $139k a decade ago
Shobana Kesava, Straits Times 22 Apr 08;

FIVE years ago, the phone rang just three times a year at the fund-raising arm of the National Parks Board (NParks). Today, there are 15 calls a month from people looking to donate to environmental causes through the Garden City Fund.

Officials said it had received more than $2 million last year from 151 donors. That was a huge leap from the under $139,000 the board received from eight benefactors a decade earlier.

Professor Leo Tan, the chairman of the fund, told The Straits Times that donations had risen steadily since the fund was launched in 2002. It has since raised money and marshalled labour for everything from tree planting to regenerating coral.

Although the Government gives donors a tax break, Prof Tan said most people were motivated by a genuine desire to help save the planet.

Donations are 'definitely linked to tax relief, but the point is there are so many places to choose from but they pick this one', Prof Tan said.

The support has gone beyond donations, with companies encouraging staff to volunteer their time for events such as public education campaigns and coastal clean-ups.

Prof Tan highlighted an effort by Keppel Corp to regenerate coral on Pulau Semakau, a man-made isle south of Singapore.

'This is a project which will take decades to see any positive impact, but it is one way (for firms) to make restitution and show their employees that (they) are good corporate citizens,' he said.

NParks, which released donation figures ahead of Earth Day today, said other corporations were also doing more than just handing over cheques.

Shell Eastern Petroleum's Nature Nurtures programme teaches at-risk youth to become guides at local nature reserves.

Citibank Singapore launched a year-long campaign last November to encourage its customers to opt for electronic statements instead of paper ones.

It has promised to plant a tree in Singapore for every 100 people who signed up for the programme, up to a cap of 1,000 trees.

NParks' figures also showed that, of the 151 donors last year, 105 were individuals. Most wanted to muddy their hands in the Plant-A-Tree programme. The scheme, which began last year, allows anyone to plant a sapling on public land for $200.

Mr Chiu Tei Tie, who is in his 70s, gathered his children and grandchildren to plant 10 trees in Ang Mo Kio Town Garden West in January.

'I grew up on a farm in Seletar and I wanted the younger generations to experience the joy I had of planting trees and caring for nature,' he said in Mandarin.

Meanwhile, NParks has replaced all 13,000 energy-guzzling mercury vapour light bulbs in parks with energy-saving lamps. That is expected to halve the agency's energy consumption and save $1.1 million on its annual power bill for park lighting.

Said Prof Tan: 'Caring for the environment has taken on a multi-sectoral dimension with people, and the private and public sectors, showing commitment. Everyone is willing to put his money where his mouth is.'


Read more!

World Food Crisis: Rumblings of social unrest

Lester R. Brown, Straits Times 22 Apr 08;

A FAST-UNFOLDING food shortage is engulfing the entire world, driving food prices to record highs.

Over the past half-century, grain prices have spiked from time to time because of weather-related events - such as the 1972 Soviet crop failure that saw a doubling of world rice, wheat and corn prices.

Today's situation is entirely different. The current doubling of grain prices is trend-driven, the cumulative effect of some trends that are accelerating demand and others that are slowing supply.

The world has not seen anything quite like this before. In the face of rising food prices and spreading hunger, the social order is starting to break down in some countries. In several provinces in Thailand, for instance, rustlers steal rice by harvesting fields during the night. In response, the villagers have taken to guarding their ripe rice fields at night, armed with loaded shotguns.

In Pakistan, where flour prices have doubled, food insecurity is a national concern. Armed troops have been assigned to guard grain elevators and to accompany trucks that transport supplies.

Food riots are now becoming commonplace. In Egypt, the lines at bakeries that distribute state-subsidised bread are often the scene of fights. Morocco has jailed 34 food rioters. In Yemen, food riots have turned deadly, taking at least a dozen lives. In Cameroon, dozens of people have died in food riots and hundreds have been arrested.

Other countries with food riots include Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines and Senegal.

The doubling of world rice, wheat and corn prices has sharply reduced the availability of food aid, putting the 37 countries that depend on the UN World Food Programme (WFP) at risk. Last month, the WFP issued an urgent appeal for US$500 million (S$678 million) of additional funds.

Around the world, a politics of food scarcity is emerging. Most fundamentally, it involves the restriction of grain exports by countries that want to check the rise in their domestic food prices. Russia, Ukraine and Argentina are among the governments that are restricting wheat exports. Countries restricting rice exports include Cambodia, Egypt and Vietnam. These export curbs simply drive prices higher in the world market.

This chronically tight food supply is driven by the cumulative effect of several trends that are affecting both global demand and supply.

On the demand side, the trends include the continuing addition of 70 million people per year to the world's population, the desire of some four billion people to move up the food chain and consume more grain-intensive livestock products as well as the sharp acceleration in the use of grain to produce ethanol for cars in the United States.

Since 2005, this last source of demand has raised the annual growth in world grain consumption from 20 million tonnes to 50 million tonnes.

Meanwhile, on the supply side, there is little new land to be brought under the plough unless it comes from clearing tropical rainforests in the Amazon and Congo basins and in Indonesia, or from clearing land in the Brazilian cerrado, a savannah-like region south of the Amazon rainforest.

Unfortunately, this has heavy environmental costs: the release of sequestered carbon, the loss of plant and animal species as well as increased rainfall runoff and soil erosion. And in scores of countries, prime cropland is being lost to industrial and residential construction and to the paving of land for roads, highways and parking lots.

New sources of irrigation water are even more scarce than new land to plough. During the last half of the 20th century, the world's irrigated area nearly tripled, expanding from 94 million ha in 1950 to 276 million ha in 2000. In the years since, there has been little, if any, growth. So irrigated area per person is shrinking by 1 per cent a year.

Meanwhile, the backlog of agricultural technology that can be used to raise cropland productivity is dwindling. Between 1950 and 1990 the world's farmers raised grainland productivity by 2.1 per cent a year. But from 1990 until 2007 this growth rate slowed to 1.2 per cent a year. And the rising price of oil is boosting the costs of both food production and transport while at the same time making it more profitable to convert grain into fuel for cars.

Beyond this, climate change presents new risks. Crop-withering heatwaves, more-destructive storms and the melting of the Asian mountain glaciers that sustain the dry-season flow of that region's major rivers are combining to make harvest expansion more difficult.

In the past, the negative effect of unusual weather events was always temporary; within a year or two things would return to normal. But with the climate in flux, there is no norm to return to.

The collective effect of these trends makes it more and more difficult for farmers to keep pace with the growth in demand.

During seven of the past eight years, grain consumption exceeded output. After seven years of drawing down stocks, world grain carryover stocks this year have fallen to 55 days of world consumption, the lowest on record.

The result is a new era of tightening food supplies, rising food prices and political instability. With grain stocks at an all-time low, the world is only one poor harvest away from total chaos in world grain markets.

Business-as-usual is no longer a viable option. Food security will deteriorate further unless leading countries can collectively mobilise to stabilise population, restrict the use of grain to produce automotive fuel, stabilise climate, stabilise water tables and aquifers, protect cropland and conserve soils.

Stabilising population is not simply a matter of providing reproductive health care and family planning services. It requires a worldwide effort to eradicate poverty.

Eliminating water shortages depends on a global attempt to raise water productivity similar to the effort launched a half-century ago to raise land productivity, an initiative that has nearly tripled the world grain yield per hectare. None of these goals can be achieved quickly, but progress towards all is essential to restoring a semblance of food security.

This troubling situation is unlike any the world has faced before. The challenge is not just to deal with a temporary rise in grain prices, as in the past, but rather to alter those trends whose cumulative effects collectively threaten the food security that is a hallmark of civilisation.

If food security cannot be restored quickly, social unrest and political instability will spread and the number of failing states will likely soar, threatening the very stability of civilisation itself.

The writer is president of the Earth Policy Institute.


Read more!

Nuts and bolts of green buildings

Business Times 22 Apr 08;

A perfect orientation is best but architects can also use other means to reduce energy consumption, reports MATTHEW PHAN

IT IS hard to pin down exactly what green architecture entails. Each building is a case study in itself, with specific surroundings, usage patterns, client requirements and weather conditions. One might use a north-south alignment to block off the sun's heat. Another, forced by circumstance to face the rising or setting sun, might use glazing or shades to achieve the same. Light and temperature controls for a residential apartment block differ from those for retail malls or industrial facilities. Still, certain principles run throughout.

Architects approach a design in two ways - passive and active. 'If you have the passive side right, half the battle is won. Then you actively use technology to manage the things you couldn't solve with the passive approach', says Tang Kok Thye, senior principal architect at ADDP Architects.

Passive refers to elements like site layout, the facing of a building and how it is structured to allow for natural lighting and ventilation. Active refers to add-ons, like special glass to keep out heat and glare, solar panels or green roofing and the building's mechanical and electrical (M&E) guts.

Because air-conditioning is typically the largest user of energy in a building, the biggest energy savings come from temperature control. In a local context, this means figuring out how to stop a building from getting too hot. The right orientation is critical. 'If a building is facing east-west, a lot of money is spent just to make it comfortable to live in', says Mr Tang. Site layout and surroundings are also important. A building next to the sea or a park is cooler than one standing next to another building that might reflect heat and light.

In the early stages of design, architects often simulate how the sunlight and wind might flow into a structure, using techniques known as Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Sun-path and wind analysis are the most common analyses. A third kind, which examines the amount of energy a building uses under varying conditions and people movements, is far more expensive and rare in Singapore.

But even the more basic analyses, due to cost, are not always done, says Mr Tang. In contrast, architectural firms in the US, where the green building movement is more advanced, often conduct environmental analysis as part of the design process.

If a building cannot have a perfect north-south orientation, which is often the case due to site constraints, architects can use other means to protect the main activity areas.

For example, Xilinx's Asia-Pacific Headquarters building - winner of the Building & Construction Authority's Green Mark Platinum award in 2007 - is diagonally oriented.

But its designer, RSP Architects Planners & Engineers, cleverly placed the stairwells and M&E rooms at the corners of the building facing the east and west, protecting the offices and chip-testing facilities at the centre of the building from the direct sun.

Xilinx also invested in doubled-glazed, low-emissive glass that helped it achieve an envelope thermal transfer value (ETTV) - a calculation how much heat a building gains through walls and windows - of 38.53 W per square metre.

This is remarkably low, said Vivien Heng, a director at RSP. There is a mandatory standard of 50 W/sq m, but most buildings don't achieve lower than 45 W/sq m, she said.

The wind flow simulation also showed up a 'dead space' with poor cross-ventilation at one portion of the building, said Ms Heng. The firm jigged the design by opening up external gaps in the facade, resulting in vastly improved wind movement through this part of the building and up and out through the central atrium. The building's internal courtyards and 'shallow' offices - no work space is more than 10 metres from the glass walls - allow wind and natural light to flow through the space, Ms Heng said.

Lend Lease Retail, the design consultant for City Square Mall, City Developments' eco-mall at Serangoon, faced similar challenges on that project. Because of the site's peculiar square shape and orientation, the mall has to contend with a main entrance facing the hot afternoon sun, though it is blocked from the rising sun by the adjacent City Square Residences, which were separately designed.

Malls are typically designed in a 'dumb-bell' layout, to maximise shop frontage, said Felix Lim, principal architect at Lend Lease Retail. This means that they are laid out in a linear strip, with speciality shops on both sides, and anchor tenants, like supermarkets or department stores, at the far ends.

The squarish site constrains an effective linear layout. So instead, Lend Lease Retail created an 'L-shape', with smaller speciality shops along the east and south sides of the square to achieve linearity, and large anchor tenants at the north-west corner.

Compared with speciality shops, anchor tenants need less 'transparency' or glass windows that allow passers-by to look in. Since the west side was largely occupied by anchor tenants, the layout meant that half or more of the mall's western front could be solid, rather than glass. This shields the mall from the western sun, and allows for advertising space on the external facade, Mr Lim explained.

For the rest of the facade - part was glass to make for an attractive entrance and allow natural light to flood the mall's large atrium - Lend Lease Retail used double-glazed low-emission glass to mitigate excessive heat and glare.

It also planned an automatic, timed sun-screen that will come down in the early afternoon and rise back up in the evening, to allow evening pedestrian traffic to look into the mall.

Both Xilinx's building and City Square Mall feature Pre-cooled Air-Handling Units (AHUs) to contain energy bills.

Air-conditioning is energy consuming because the air here is warm and humid. A Pre-cooled AHU system first brings in outside air, cools it via cooling coils and mixes it with treated return air in a separate chamber. The pre-cooled air is then further cooled in the AHU system proper and piped into the building.

The process is capital intensive upfront but results in long-term savings. Thanks to such measures, as well as other green innovations, City Square Mall, which won the Building and Construction Authority's Green Mark Platinum award last year, saves the equivalent of 11.4 million kWH per year or equivalent to the total consumption of nearly 2,400 four-room HDB flats.

ADDP Architects incorporated light screens, solar panels and rainwater harvesting into its design for Cliveden, a CDL condominium project and another 2007 Green Mark Platinum award winner.

On Cliveden's clubhouse, solar panels reduce energy dependence on the main grid, while a green roof not only helps to reduce heat inside the clubhouse but also the surrounding environment. The centre was planned as an educational centre for public awareness on using green power, said Mr Tang.

The condo collects rainwater from its roof and reuses it for landscaping, saving about 10 swimming pools of water a year. The total water and energy saved, about 30 per cent, is equivalent to saving 77,475 trees.

Another green building, from a water conservation point of view, is Temasek Polytechnic. The school installed a $1.6 million rainwater harvesting system when its 30 hectare campus was being built in the early 1990s, with the water used to for the school's extensive gardens.

Ultimately, though, the greenest of green architecture is conservation and restoration, because a lot of energy is required to knock down a building and erect a new one, architects say.

'Building is one of the most energy-intensive activities around', says Ms Heng. And ADDP's Mr Tang agrees. 'As an architect. you would like to preserve nature but it depends on the developers' needs,' he said. 'Buildings should be made to last more than 50 to 100 years.'


Read more!

Asia Dive Expo: Christine Ward-Paige reveals shocking new statistics on shark depletion

BYM Marine Environment News 21 Apr 08;

ADEX 2008 Organiser call for Asians to play their part in preserving the species by avoiding shark fin soup

A visiting speaker at Asia Dive Expo 2008 from Canada-based Global Shark Assessment revealed shocking new statistics on shark depletion figures worldwide.

According to Christine Ward-Paige, a researcher with the group, the situation is exceedingly grim with shark populations globally being driven to the verge of extinction mainly by the highly profitable practice of shark finning to supply Asian dinner tables and wedding banquets, with the principle demand coming from mainland China.

Ms. Ward-Paige highlighted several studies by Dr. Ransom Myers, founder of Global Shark Assessment which indicated alarming drop offs in global populations of various shark species. One study¹ found that the Oceanic Whitetip shark native to the Gulf of Mexico had declined by more than 99% since 1950. Now almost forgotten, the species was once one of the most commonly caught sharks in the region.

Another study³ found that Pelagic (deep water, ocean) sharks in the Northwest Atlantic are also in serious trouble with recent declines ranging from 40% in mako sharks up to almost 90% in hammerhead sharks. In a third study, Dr. Myer’s found a 90% decline globally in the world's predatory fish, including sharks in the Gulf of Thailand².

Ms. Ward-Paige’s group provided statistics to underwater filmmaker Rob Stewart for his film Sharkwater, which made a huge impact on Singaporean moviegoers when it was released recently.

Said Ms. Ward-Paige, “What is not realised is that Sharkwater is actually now more than two years old and, since it was produced, shark populations around the world have further declined dramatically”, whilst at the same time demand for shark fin (soup) has continued to explode in Asia.

Ms. Ward-Paige pointed to two types of extinction faced by sharks – commercial extinction, where the rarity of the fish simply makes the practice of finning commercially unfeasible as a business, and functional extinction in which there are just too few sharks left in existence to support the growth or fresh shark populations. Either way, the “commercial” or “functional” extinction of shark populations around the world would likely be irreversible.

Herman Ho, Managing Director of ADEX, said that research by top marine biologists like Dr. Myers and the Global Shark Assessment all indicate the same fate for sharks - imminent extinction of the species within ten to fifteen years at the present rates of decline.

Speakers, conservationists and dive professionals at ADEX all agreed that Asians may not need to adapt culturally to avoid eating sharks fin, because in the near future that change will simply be forced upon them by the complete eradication of the species due to illegal finning carried out on a massive scale. The removal of a culturally important practice such as consuming shark fin at wedding banquets may be felt by consumers to be a loss, but the loss to the marine eco-system will be far more serious.

Mr. Ho said that this year, ADEX has focused on green issues like eco-diving, marine conservation and the adoption of a sustainable approach towards the world's oceans. Central to marine conservation is the balancing of the ecosystem. “By finning, we are causing a disruption to the ecosystem. Sharks, the natural predators of the oceans, keep other marine populations within sustainable limits and are important to the balance of the wider biosphere, “ said Mr. Ho.

In Sharkwater, Rob Stewart closes with the sobering words, “We depend on the oceans for oxygen, the oceans that sharks control. If we lose sharks we’ll disrupt the oxygen we need to breathe.”

“At a time when everyone is equating environmental awareness with being concerned about CO2 emissions and looking up at the sky, we tend to forget to look downwards towards the ocean depths and how we are abusing the underwater environment and the creatures which dwell there,” said Mr. Ho.

“We therefore close ADEX this year with a call to action for all Asian people, and Singaporeans in particular, to avoid the practice of eating shark fin. This custom of serving a prestige dish, a quite meaningless gesture really, will shortly eradicate one of the oldest living species on the planet, since sharks were around for millions of years before mankind arrived.”

Singaporean diver Michael Aw, founder of ADEX exhibitor Ocean N Environment and publisher of Ocean Geographic magazine, has created the “Double Joy Luck” card which Chinese wedding couples can place on their banquet tables to inform and educate their guests as to why they are not serving shark fin for dinner. “It’s a great way for two individuals to reach out to maybe several hundred people at the same time to try to change their cultural perceptions towards the practice of eating shark fin. Those people can go on to educate their friends and family members in turn,” said Mr. Aw.

“ADEX hopes to provide an annual forum for discussion of environmentally sustainable issues such as shark finning or coral bleaching and get the whole dive community networked on the latest developments so they can develop strategies and react to them as one voice,” said Mr. Ho.

As if to illustrate this point, Mr. Barry Andrewartha, editor of Sport Diving Magazine, now into its 20th year, raised the red flag at ADEX this week on Queensland’s recent and surprising issuing of permits for shark finning along the Great Barrier Reef. This development, in a country widely regarded as having high levels of environmentally awareness at government level, comes at a time when Global Shark Assessment says that nothing short of a total global ban on shark finning will be able to reverse the depletion trends.

Preservation of fragile coral reefs also came under the spotlight at ADEX this week. Richard Leck, Climate Change Strategy Leader for the Coral Triangle was at ADEX to speak to members of the tourism industry about how climate change will physically and economically impact on the Coral Triangle. Mr. Leck’s group hopes to build a sense of understanding and commitment to this issue and eventually help build a series of actions and recommendations that conservationists and the industry can work towards.

Another conservation expert, Julian Hyde, Malaysian chapter leader for US-based Reef Check, was also at ADEX to address reef-preservation. In 1997, Reef Check provided the first solid evidence that coral reefs have been damaged on a global scale. The survey raised the awareness of scientists, governments, politicians and the general public about the value of coral reefs, threats to their health and solutions to coral reef problems. Julian, who is based in the popular tourist island of Tioman, spoke about the work on Reef Check Malaysia in monitoring and reversing damage to coral reefs by poor dive and fishing practices.

ADEX provided an opportunity for many local school children to learn what marine conservation is all about. The show’s EcoVillage @ ADEX, an educational-raising initiative this year, hosted visiting groups from MGS, Fairfield, Nanyang Girls, SMU, Ngee Ann Poly, Jurong West Secondary and Chung Cheng Yishun.

Mr. Ho concluded by saying, “For ADEX to adopt a green theme is no fad. There is really no choice. Unless the regional dive industry as a whole adopts a sustainable approach to regional marine eco-systems there will quite simply be nothing left to see, and therefore no dive industry. Those who have dived the Mediterranean will know what it means to dive a sea severely depleted of corals and marine species.”

ADEX will be back next year and the event, now under the new management of TMX Productions, will be continually based in Singapore from 2008 onwards.


Read more!

Thai environmentalists try to turn shoppers away from plastic bags

Jutarat Tongpiam, Yahoo News 22 Apr 08;

Environmentalists in Thailand have waged a long, uphill battle against plastic bags, trying to convince skeptical consumers to give up a convenience that many regard as a symbol of modern life.

Now their campaign is finally gaining momentum, as businesses find profit in selling reusable, fabric shopping bags that have become a hot new trend embraced by celebrities and major retailers.

From China to Britain to South Africa, activists and authorities have taken steps to discourage or even ban single-use plastic bags which activists say choke landfills, cause pollution and damage wildlife.

Just a generation ago, Thais carried baskets or fabric bags to markets to do their shopping, and bought food wrapped in banana leaves, said Anake Nawigamune, an expert on traditional Thai culture at the Cultural Affairs Association.

"Plastic bags started replacing those containers in the 1970s. Later plastic bags became common all over Thailand," said Anake.

"Everyone loves convenience. That also applies to Thai society, which has shifted to plastic bags," he said.

But public awareness of climate change is growing in Thailand. Bangkok has hosted major UN climate meetings this year and last year, while the city has joined in international campaigns such as Earth Hour, which encouraged people to turn off their lights to save energy.

Major shopping malls and other businesses are eager to show off their green credentials, and cloth bags have become one of the most popular ways to do so.

Krittachamai Ratanaphupha, 40-year-old owner of a company called Goodearth, said orders for her fabric shopping bags have her scrambling to meet demand.

"Our hands are now so full with local orders that we do not have time to think of exporting," she said.

Companies are ordering as many as 500,000 bags at a time, and she's selling them for up to 50 baht (1.58 dollars) each, she said.

The most popular models carry slogans that effectively proclaim the carrier's green credentials, such as "Stop global warming" or "Reduce and reuse."

Demand is driving up the cost of the fabric used to make the bags, which jumped from 18 to 26 baht per yard within a week in March, she said.

Another maker of fabric bags, Hatairat Promsakanasakonnakorn, concurred, saying orders for her products were also soaring, with many companies distributing the bags as promotional items rather than T-shirts or other products.

"The bags are very trendy," she said. "And a fabric bag is cheaper than a T-shirt" by about 25 percent.

Both Hatairat and Krittachamai worry that the move toward cloth bags could be just a trend unless the government actively discourages the use of plastic.

"Green trends like this fabric bag campaign are hardly sustainable if the government does not legally enforce them," Krittachamai said.

Vorragorn Taenumchai, an environmentalist at the environment ministry, said he feared the cloth bag trend could be just that -- a passing fad that will not instill long-term change in Thai consumers' behaviour.

"Retailers can do better by providing easily degradable plastic bags or foam containers," Vorragorn said.

He also encouraged environmental campaigners to focus their efforts not just on shoppers but on the education of young children to ensure change takes hold.

"Concern for the environment is about changing habits and taking responsibility. That won't change in just a few days or weeks because of trendy campaigns," Vorragorn said.


Read more!

Drought hits millions in Thai rice region: government

Reuters 21 Apr 08;

More than 10 million people in parts of Thailand's rice bowl region have been hit by drought, the government said Monday, causing further concerns as prices of the staple grain soar.

Thailand's Disaster Prevention and Mitigation department reported that 55 of the kingdom's 76 provinces were struggling with drought, mostly in the central, north and northeastern regions.

More than 151,000 rai (60,000 acres) of farmland has been affected, they said in a statement, including half of the key central rice growing provinces.

Vichien Phantodee, a member of the Thai Farmers Association, said rice farmers have been trying to exploit soaring prices and an increased global demand for the grain.

"Farmers want to plant more rice because the price is so good," Vichien told AFP. "But the drought does affect rice production, particularly for farmland outside the irrigation areas."

The first rice harvest of the year in Thailand, the world's biggest rice exporter, traditionally ends in late March or early April. Farmers then let the fields recover, before planting a second harvest in May.

But as export and domestic rice prices hit record highs, many farmers are trying to plant a third crop or move their second harvest forward to take advantage of the boom.

The benchmark Thai variety, Pathumthani fragrant rice, was priced on April 9 at 956 dollars per tonne for export, up about 50 percent from a month earlier, the Thai Rice Exporters Association said in its price survey.

International demand for Thai rice has soared after other top exporters, Vietnam and India, imposed limits on exports to ensure domestic supply.


Read more!

Biofuels under fire at International Energy Forum

Reuters 21 Apr 08;

Biofuels, once seen as a key factor in curbing greenhouse gas emissions, are behind the current global food crisis, major oil producers and consumers charged at an energy forum here on Monday.

"A conflict (is) emerging between foodstuffs and fuel ... with disastrous social conflicts and dubious environmental results," outgoing Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi told the International Energy Forum here as rising food prices worldwide raise the spectre of famine in some countries.

"We have to examine very closely subsidy policies so as to avoid distortions in the allocation of resources," Prodi insisted.

Agricultural prices were not only being driven by rising demand but also by increased cultivation of biofuels, "creating strong tensions in a number of countries," he said.

Biofuels were developed as part of plans to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, held responsible for global warming, but since they take up land that would otherwise be used for food production, they have been increasingly blamed for soaring food prices.

Qatari Energy Minister Abdullah bin Hamad al Attiyah said the world would have to choose "what its priority is going to be -- driving or eating."

He rejected suggestions that high oil prices were behind the food crisis.

"It's not oil that should be questioned, it's biofuels, which are at the root of the problem," al Attiyah said.

The food crisis was due to food shortages and not to high oil prices, he argued.

"Even the big rice exporters such as India, Bangladesh and Thailand are in the process of reducing their exports," he said. "

Venezuelan Energy Minister Rafael Ramirez said that biofuels were having a negligible impact on the oil markets.

"But look at the impact (they have) had on food prices. It's madness," he said, adding: "All the countries of Latin America have been hit by the surge in food prices."

Lawrence Eagles, chief analyst at the International Energy Agency (IEA) which represents the interests of the oil consuming countries, said he believed biofuels were "part of the equation" but it would be "wrong to focus solely" on just one element.

Rising food prices were due primarily to "very strong demand" for agricultural products in emerging countries, he said.

The IEA supported the use of second-generation biofuels, which used non-food plants as their base, Eagles argued.

"The second generation has its place in the palette of energy products," he said.

Meanwhile the head of Royal Dutch Shell, Jeroen van der Veer, said that too much importance was being attached to biofuels. Biofuels "will play a role" but were only one of a number of energy components in the mix, he said.


Read more!

Carbon cap would cost U.S. households 1 percent: report

Deborah Zabarenko, Reuters 21 Apr 08;

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Capping carbon emissions would cost U.S. households less than one cent on the dollar over the next two decades, an environmental group reported on Monday, disputing critics who say mandatory limits on greenhouse gases would cost jobs and damage the economy.

"The United States can enjoy robust economy growth over the next several decades while making ambitious reductions in greenhouse gas emissions," the study by Environmental Defense Fund concluded. "And in the long run, the coming low-carbon-economy can provide the foundation for sustained American economic growth and prosperity."

The report was released before a June debate in the U.S. Senate on a carbon-capping plan.

"There are companies who have raised money who are deliberately trying to scare the American public as this debate and vote in the Senate approaches, into thinking this is going to put scads of people out of work and damage the economy," said Peter Goldmark of Environmental Defense Fund.

President George W. Bush has consistently opposed mandatory cap-and-trade programs to limit emissions of climate-warming carbon dioxide, citing damaging economic effects if such a plan becomes U.S. law.

The study analyzed five prominent models forecasting the economic impact of a cap-and-trade program similar to that set for debate on the Senate floor. These included scenarios from the U.S. government's Energy Information Agency, Harvard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Triangle Institute and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories.

By looking at all five of these models, the analysis found the projected median impact on annual growth over the next two decades is 0.03 percent, with average U.S. growth expected to continue at nearly 3 percent per year, about the same rate since the end of the World War Two.

That small downward impact is so slight as to be barely distinguishable from the measurement of error in the various models, said Nathaniel Keohane, an environmental economist and the report's author.

Capping greenhouse gases will cost average U.S. household less than one cent on the dollar per year over next two decades. By comparison, they now spend more than three cents on insurance, nearly four on national defense, 10 on Social Security.

Keohane said total U.S. economic output is expected to grow to $26 trillion by January 2030; with a cap on greenhouse emissions, the economy will reach that level in April 2030.

As to job loss due to climate policy, Keohane said the number of manufacturing jobs created or destroyed every three months in the United States is much greater than the cumulative projected impact over the course of 20 years.

Bush announced last week a goal to stop the growth of U.S. greenhouse emissions by 2025, but offered no specifics.

The United States is alone among major industrialized nations in rejecting the Kyoto Protocol, which mandates a cap-and-trade plan. U.S. officials have said any global plan should include developing, big-emitting countries including China and India.

(Editing by Doina Chiacu)


Read more!

Climate projects prevented 135 million tonnes of CO2: agency

Yahoo News 21 Apr 08;

Projects to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries have prevented 135 million tonnes of CO2 emissions from entering Earth's atmosphere so far, the Norwegian classification group Det Norske Veritas (DNV) said on Monday.

The projects, known as Clean Development Mechanisms (CDMs) and defined in the Kyoto Protocol, allow industrialised countries and their companies to finance projects aimed at reducing greenhouse gases in developing countries.

In return the investors are credited with emission rights.

The 1,000th project has just been certified in India, said Det Norske Veritas, one of the world's leading classification agencies.

"CDM projects have so far generated more than 135 million certified emission reductions (CERs, each unit of which is equivalent to one tonne of CO2)," it said.

"The mechanism is currently anticipated to generate more than 2.7 billion CERs in the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period" that runs from 2008 to 2012, it added.

By comparison, Norway emitted 53.7 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent last year.

CDM projects, which have primarily benefitted China and India so far, are not free from controversy.

Critics argue that some dam projects in China have been officially certified as CDMs even though they were partially constructed before being given the certification -- suggesting they would actually be used outside the CDM framework.

"There's always a chance that mistakes are made. But the criteria have been gradually tightened. It's typically a case of learning by doing," Det Norske Veritas's global director of climate change services Luc Larmuseau told AFP.


Read more!