Best of our wild blogs: 4 Jun 10


Help wanted - clean up at Tanah Merah 5 Jun (Sat)
from wild shores of singapore

Field Assistant position, Jun-Aug 2010
from The Biodiversity crew @ NUS

Marvellous mangroves of Pasir Ris
from wild shores of singapore

Jaws – Spidey Galore #1
from My Itchy Fingers

Racing for Butterflies on a Saturday morning
from Butterflies of Singapore

Baya Weavers teaching fledglings to fly
from Bird Ecology Study Group

Inter Tidal walk @ Big Sister's Island on 30 May 2010
from Where Discovery Begins

Raffles Museum Treasures: Curved spiny spider
from Lazy Lizard's Tales


Read more!

NEA says waters at East Coast & Changi beaches now safe

Channel NewsAsia 4 Jun 10;

SINGAPORE : It is now safe to do water activities at East Coast Beach and Changi Beach.

They were re-opened for such activities Friday.

The National Environment Agency, NEA, said its checks Friday morning revealed that the water at the two beaches have returned to normal.

However, the public may still come across some small tar balls along the shoreline.

NEA says there is no cause for alarm, as contact with the tar balls will not cause any harm.

Anyone who comes into contact with these tar balls can remove them with soap and water.

Members of the public can contact the NEA 24-hour call centre at 1800- 2255632 if they have any queries.

On May 25, two vessels, the MT Bunga Kelana 3 and the MV Waily collided in the eastern waters off Singapore, resulting in an oil spill that spread to the beaches and a nature wetland. - CNA/jy

Update On The Oil Spill Clean-up (8)
NEA press release 4 Jun 10;

Singapore, 4 June 2010 - Checks by NEA this morning revealed that the water at East Coast Beach and Changi Beach have returned to normal. However, the public may still come across some small tar balls along the shoreline. There is no cause for alarm, as contact with the tar balls will not cause any harm. Anyone who comes into contact with these tar balls can remove them with soap and water.

The beaches will be re-opened to the public today for water contact activities.

Members of the public can contact our 24-hour call centre at 1800-CALL NEA (2255632) if they have any queries.

~~ End ~~

For more information, please contact

Call Centre: 1800-CALL NEA (1800-2255 632)
Email: Contact_NEA@nea.gov.sg

Beaches reopen after a week
Safe to resume all water activities, declares NEA
Amresh Gunasingham Straits Times 5 Jun 10;

BEACHES in the east were opened again yesterday, more than a week after they were closed following an oil spill off the Changi coast.

The reopening of the beaches in Changi, East Coast Park and Pasir Ris comes after days of testing the water in the affected areas, which have been given a clean bill of health, the National Environment Agency (NEA) said yesterday.

It added that all water activities could now be resumed.

The waters had been closed since May 25, when an oil slick caused by a collision of two large vessels off Changi had spread to a 10km stretch of the eastern shoreline.

When The Straits Times visited East Coast Park yesterday, there was a mix of revellers splashing about in the water on an overcast afternoon and other beachgoers who preferred to play it safe, opting to tread carefully on the sand instead of taking a dip.

Although the water appeared clear of oil, the beach was dotted with black tar balls and twigs - enough to put some off taking to the water.

'The beach still looks dirty... I think more cleaning needs to be done before I go in (the water),' said National Junior College student Teresa Liew.

Another visitor, who wanted to be known only as Mr Liow, decided against allowing his primary school-going niece and nephew into the water.

'It looks clean but I'd rather not take the risk,' said the 41-year old civil servant.

NEA said yesterday that the tar balls, which are formed when crude oil mixes with water to form a sticky emulsion that looks like chocolate pudding, did not a pose a health hazard. It said anyone who comes into contact with these tar balls can remove any oil stains with soap and water.

Polytechnic student Suresh Kumar, 19, had no qualms about taking a swim: 'The water tastes a bit saltier than normal, but I do not see the oil.'

A small army of volunteers and cleaners were seen trawling the beach yesterday, picking up litter as well as residue left from the oil spill caused by the collision between Malaysian-registered tanker MT Bunga Kelana 3 and the MV Waily, a bulk carrier registered in St Vincent and the Grenadines.

Some 2,500 tonnes of oil were dumped 13km off the Changi coast. In addition to the eastern coastline, the oil spill subsequently spread to Chek Jawa - a protected 100ha wetland off Pulau Ubin.

Some 60 tonnes of contaminated oil sand bags have been removed since the clean-up began. Efforts over the last 11 days involved more than 20 boats and 120 personnel. Biodegradable dispersants were used to break up the oil while 3.3km of booms were put in place to hold in the spill.

Clean-up costs are estimated to reach hundreds of thousands. The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore had previously said both ship owners were 'jointly and severally liable for the cost of the clean-up', although under Singapore law, the tab must first be covered by the oil tanker's operator.


Read more!

Oil slick clean up in Johor finally finished

Farik Zolkepli The Star 4 Jun 10;

PENGERANG: The week-long clean-up of the oil spill here finally ended two days ago with thousands of bags of sludge removed from the sea by a 300-strong clean-up crew.

Natural Resources and Envi­ronment Minister Datuk Douglas Uggah Embas confirmed the operation was over.

“I am satisfied with the way the agencies, especially the Department of Environment (DOE) carried out their duties after I instructed them to conclude the operation within three days.

“We still have some minor cleaning up to do but for the most part, the clean-up operation has been completed,” he said in an interview here yesterday.

Malaysian-registered tanker MT Bunga Kelana 3 collided with bulk carrier MV Waily in the strait, about 13km southeast of Changi East on Monday morning, resulting in the oil spill.

Uggah added that the operation would not have been successful without the cooperation of local fishermen, shipping companies as well as the Kota Tinggi district office.

Uggah, who had expressed his dissatisfaction on the clean-up operation on Sunday, said he was happy the agencies had responded well.

“They (the agencies’ officers) told me they needed 10 days to complete the operation.

“I told them to cut the red tape and get it done in three days,” he said.

Douglas said that in times of emergency, there should be little protocol involved.

Media Prima staff save beach
Sim Bak Heng and Ling Poh Lean New Straits Times 4 Jun 10;

KOTA TINGGI: Staff of Media Prima Bhd (MPB) and its two subsidiaries -- TV3 and The New Straits Times Press -- translated their love for the environment into action when about 100 of them took part in cleaning up two stretches of oil slicks at Teluk Ramunia, Pengerang, yesterday.

The staff of three companies left Sri Pentas and Balai Berita in Bangsar in two buses and four vans at 12.30am and reached the beach, which is part of the coastlines affected by oil spills, at 6.30am.

They started cleaning the beach at 9am. The fine weather was perfect for the gotong-royong exercise themed "Save Our Beach", which lasted until 5pm.

MPB executive director (news) Datuk Ahmad A. Talib, who led the team, said the beach clean-up programme was among the community service projects mooted by the group to reach out to the people in time of need and to save the environment.

He said all participants had contributed their efforts whole-heartedly.


"The exercise is aimed to give exposure to our staff on environmental preservation. Following this success, we have decided to form a volunteer squad from our group to render assistance during emergency when voluntary efforts are needed."

Ahmad said the group would also establish a closer rapport with the Malaysian Red Crescent Society and Mercy Malaysia in future community service projects.

NSTP senior manager (event and corporate communication) Wan Abdillah Wan Nawi said he was glad the exercise could be carried out in such a short notice, and hoped it would be able to instil the spirit of environmental awareness among the staff.


Tanjung Surat state assemblyman Datuk Harun Abdullah, who was present, expressed his gratitude over the initiative taken by MPB and its subsidiaries to extend their helping hands in cleaning the beach.

"I think this is an effective way in building a close bonding between the people and the media."

About 2,000 tonnes of crude oil spilled into the waters off the coast here after tanker MT Bunga Kelana 3, laden with 61,800 tonnes of crude oil, collided with cargo vessel MV Waily on May 25.

In Kuala Lumpur, the State Environment Department in a statement said 17.8km of the shores between Tanjung Pengelih and Tanjung Pinggai had been cleared of oil slicks.

A total of 10,761 bags containing oil and sand were collected during the cleaning operation.

It said the next effort will be focussed on Sungai Bongko (400m) and Sungai Haji Ahmad (160m).

On detection of oil slicks, the public can call the department's hotline at 1-800-88-2727.


Read more!

World's ecosystems provide 'services' equal to global income

Yahoo News 3 Jun 10;

NAIROBI (AFP) – The world's biodiversity and ecosystems deliver services to humanity estimated to be worth as much as the world gross national income, the UN environment programme (UNEP) said Thursday.

In a study released two days before World Environment Day is held in Rwanda, the UN agency warned that two thirds of these ecoystems have already been damaged by humans.

"Biodiversity and ecosystems deliver crucial services to humankind -- from food security to keeping our waters clean, buffering against extreme weather, providing medicines to recreation and adding to the foundation of human culture," the report said.

"Together these services have been estimated to be worth over 21 to 72 trillion US dollars every year -- comparable to the World Gross National Income of 58 trillion USD in 2008," it said.

UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner said this reality has not been given enough consideration in the past and urged governments to factor in ecosystem management in their development plans and accounts.

"In the past these services have been invisible or near invisible in national and international accounts. This should and must change," Steiner said at the launch of the report, entitled "Dead Planet, Living Planet".

"Restoration pays off: wetlands and forests can be up to 22 times more effective than investing in water treatment plants," he explained.

Rehabilitating Nature-Based Assets Generates Jobs, Wealth and Restoration of Multi-Trillion Dollar Services

Embargoed: not for publication or broadcast until after 3pm GMT 3 June 2010

New UNEP Report-Dead Planet: Living Planet- Makes Economic Case for Repairing Damaged and Degraded Natural World

World Environment Day: Many Species, One Planet, One Future

3 June 2010-Restoring lost and damaged ecosystems-from forests and freshwaters to mangroves and wetlands-can trigger multi-million dollar returns, generate jobs and combat poverty according to a new report compiled by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).

Launched on the eve of World Environment Day (WED), the report draws on thousands of ecosystem restoration projects world-wide and showcases over 30 initiatives that are transforming the lives of communities and countries across the globe.

The report, entitled Dead Planet, Living Planet: Biodiversity and Ecosystem Restoration for Sustainable Development, underlines that far from being a tax on growth and development, many environmental investments in degraded, nature-based assets can generate substantial and multiple returns.

These include restoring water flows to rivers and lakes, improved soil stability and fertility vital for agriculture and combating climate change by sequestrating and storing carbon from the atmosphere.

The report underlines that maintaining and managing intact ecosystems must be the key priority. But given that more than 60 per cent of them-ranging from marshes and coral reefs to tropical forests and soils-are already degraded, restoration must now be an equal priority.

Repairing and rehabilitating ecosystems also generates jobs in a world where currently 1.3 billion are unemployed or underemployed while supporting international goals to substantially reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity-a key theme of 2010.

Is Ecosystem Restoration Worth It?

The report cites evidence that well-planned, science-based, community supported programmes can recover 25 44 per cent of the original services alongside the animals, plants and other biodiversity of the former intact system.

This is highlighted by a study on restoring degraded grasslands and lands around river systems in South Africa's Drakensberg Mountains.

It estimates that the project will bring back winter river flows to vulnerable communities amounting to close to 4 million cubic metres of water, cut sediment losses and store carbon.

Cost-$4.5 million or Euro 3.6 million over seven years and annual management costs of Euro 800,000.

Return-up to $7.4 million (Euro 6 million) a year while generating over 300 permanent, natural resource management jobs and 2.5 million person-days of work during the restoration phase.

Ecosystem Restoration-It is Not Always So Simple

The report however cites cases were often well-intentioned restorations have back-fired underlining that such projects should be carried out with care and planning.

The report cites the introduction into European waters of North American signal crayfish after over harvesting had reduced catches of native species to in some cases 10 per cent of the original catch.

Unfortunately the imports, initially into Swedish waters, carried a crayfish plague that has spread to native populations in an estimated 21 countries-some countries are trying to establish 'ark-sites' or secure sites to save the remaining indigenous populations.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: "The ecological infrastructure of the planet is generating services to humanity worth by some estimates over $70 trillion a year, perhaps substantially more. In the past these services have been invisible or near invisible in national and international accounts. This should and must change".

"This report is aimed at bringing two fundamental messages to governments, communities and citizens on World Environment Day and in 2010-the UN's International Year of Biodiversity. Namely that mismanagement of natural and nature-based assets is under cutting development on a scale that dwarfs the recent economic crisis," he said.

"Two: that well-planned investments and re-investments in the restoration of these vast, natural and nature-based utilities not only has a high rate of return. But will be central, if not fundamental, to sustainability in a world of rising aspirations, populations, incomes and demands on the Earth's natural resources," said Mr Steiner who was in Kigali, Rwanda the main host for this year's global WED events.

The theme of ecosystem restoration underpins the Projeto Agua Limpa or Clean Water Project co-launched by UNEP Goodwill Ambassador Gisele Bündchen and her father in 2008 in her hometown of Horizontina.

The project is aimed at restoring the health of water supplies alongside a boost to biodiversity by restoring forests and rehabilitating river banks and riverside vegetation alongside river basins.

Ms Bündchen said: "UNEP's report on ecosystem restoration spotlights the enormous opportunities for communities to invest in their future development.

"Indeed restoring degraded environments is among the best gifts we can give and hand on to current and future generations-we need to bring to the attention of everyone the central link between forests, wetlands and other natural systems and our survival and prosperity in this extraordinary world," she added.

"Restoration pays off: Wetlands and forests can be up to 22 times more effective than investing in water treatment plants," says Christian Nellemann of UNEP's GRID-Arendal in Norway, who headed up the Rapid Response Report launched today. "Do it right. Back it up with long term management and, where needed, ensure laws are enforced. Ensure law enforcement. And you will succeed with broad public support and generate immediate and long term returns."

The report makes a series of recommendations including:

. Urging overseas development agencies; international finance agencies and other funders such as regional development banks to factor ecosystem restoration and long term management assistance into development support; food security initiatives; job creation and poverty alleviation funding.

. One per cent of GDP should be set aside annually for conservation, management and restoration of the environment and natural resources, with the precise amount linked to national circumstances.

. That ecosystem restoration is guided by experiences learnt to date to avoid unintended consequences such as the introduction of alien invasive species and pests.

. That priority is initially given to biodiversity and ecosystem 'hotspots'.

. That infrastructure projects that damage an ecosystem has funds set aside to restore a similar degraded ecosystem elsewhere in a country or community.

Key Highlights from the Report

The Economic Case for Ecosystems

Through The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), hosted by UNEP, and a myriad of other recent reports and initiative, the value of the Earth's natural assets and their role in development are now being glimpsed.

. It is estimated that ecosystems deliver essential services worth between $21 trillion and up to $72 trillion a year-comparable to World Gross National Income in 2008 of $58 trillion.

. Wetlands, half of which have been drained over the past century often for agriculture, provide annual services of near $7 trillion.

. Forested wetlands treat more wastewater per unit of energy and have up to 22 fold higher cost-benefit ratios than traditional sand filtration in treatment plants.

. Coastal wetlands in the United States, which among other services provide storm protection, have been valued at $23 billion annually.

. In India, mangroves serving as storm barriers have been noted to reduce individual household damages from $153 per household to an average of $33 per household in areas with intact mangroves.

. Pollination from bees and other insects provide services boosting agricultural production worth at least $153 billion annually.

Ecosystems are also central in natural pest control, indeed, many of the world's key crops such as coffee, tea and mangoes are dependent on the pollination and pest control services of birds and insects.

. By some estimates projected loss of ecosystem services could lead to up to 25 per cent loss in the world's food production by 2050 increasing the risks of hunger.

. Services delivered by the Mau forest complex in Kenya, such as hydropower, drinking water, moisture for the tea industry abd river flows to key tourist attractions including the Massai Mara and Lake Nakuru, are worth an estimated $320 million a year.

The $320 million was based on a calculation in 2008. Today it was announced by the Kenya Forest Research Institute that new calculations indicate that the ecosystem services of the Mau may be more like $1.5 billion a year after adding additional beneficiary sectors such as drinking water provision to cities and carbon storage of greenhouse gases.

. Currently 75 per cent of globally, usable freshwater supplies come from forests. Many cities including Rio de Janeiro, Johannesburg, Tokyo, Melbourne, New York and Jakarta all rely on protected areas to provide residents with drinking water.

. Overall one third of the world's 100 largest cities draw a substantial proportion of their drinking water from forest protected areas.

. Without the national protected area network in Venezuela, sedimentation of rivers could reduce farm earnings by around $3.5 million a year.

. The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection has been estimated at $250 51,000 per hectare per year, with an average of $8,240 per hectare per year.

. Over 80 per cent of people in developing countries rely on traditional plant-based medicines for basic healthcare.

. Three-quarters of the world's top-selling prescription drugs include ingredients derived from plant extracts.

. Environmental degradation including ecosystem losses is augmenting the impact of natural disasters such as floods, droughts and flash floods affecting 270 million people annually and killing some 124,000 people worldwide every year, of which 85 per cent are in Asia.

. Greenhouse gas emissions from peatland drainage in Southeast Asia is contributing the equivalent of 1.3 to 3.1 per cent of current global CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuel - as well as threatening the survival of the endangered orangutans.

. The recent agreement signed on 26 May 2010 between Norway and Indonesia on the financial support of US$ one billion to reduce deforestation and draining of peatlands, provides a new impetus for both climate change mitigation and the endangered orang-utans in these unique forests.

The Case for Ecosystem Restoration

The report underlines that conserving existing ecosystems is far cheaper than restoration.

Effective conservation, such as that practised in many National Parks and protected areas may cost from a few tens of dollars to a few hundred dollars per hectare.

However, protected areas cover only 13 per cent, 6 per cent and less than 1 per cent of the planet's land, coastal and ocean areas.

Many important ecosystems fall outside these areas. Restoration costs may be ten times higher than managing existing ecosystems, but still something of a bargain considering the returns in terms of restored nature-based services.

Indeed the report says that compared to loss of ecosystem services, well-planned restorations may provide cost benefit ratios of 3 75 in terms of return on investment.

Initial studies compiled by TEEB indicate that restoration of grasslands, woodlands and forests offer some of the highest rates of returns.

. The Turkish city of Istanbul has increased the number of people served with wastewater treatment over 20 years from a few hundred thousand to over nine million-95 per cent of the population-by rehabilitating and cleaning river banks, relocating polluting industries, installing water treatment works and re-establishing river-side vegetation.

. In Vietnam, planting and protecting nearly 12,000 hectares of mangroves has cost just over $1 million but saved annual expenditure on dyke maintenance of well over $7 million.

. In Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, strict law enforcement, costing the lives of over 190 rangers, has helped restore the critically endangered mountain gorilla population back to a slight increase in the Virungas National Park - and is generating large revenues from tourism.

. Restoration of over 500 hectares of mangroves in India's Andhra Pradesh region has cost $3 million over seven years but has increased the population of edible crabs and fodder for livestock thereby boosting local incomes while increasing biodiversity such as otter and birds.

. Coastal ecosystems in Biscayne Bay, Florida have been restored for annual benefit worth $1.7 million.

. Banning unsustainable fishing methods; re-introductions of native fish species and re-planting of native aquatic grasses have transformed the once highly polluted and degraded Lake Hong in China.

. Since 2003, water quality has improved dramatically, rare birds like the Oriental White Stork have returned after 20 years and fisher folk have seen incomes triple.

Among the case studies is a re-afforestation project in an area of Tanzania called the Shinyanga region just south of Lake Victoria.

Until recently it was nick-named the Desert of Tanzania as a result of deforestation and the conversion of woodlands into croplands.

However an 18-year project aimed at creating village-based woodland enclosures has reversed land degradation and improved rural livelihoods.

Some 350,000 hectares of ngitili, the local world for enclosures, have been planted covering well over 800 villages and 2.8 million people.

Studies by the Tanzanian government and the group IUCN highlights multiple improvements such as better diets and food security and less time spent by women searching for fuel wood.

. The cash benefits of the restoration alone are estimated at about $14 per person per month, some $5.50 higher than the national average.

Under the UN's climate agreements, countries are moving to pay developing nations to conserve rather than fell forests.

Known as Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, this could lead to an estimated halving of deforestation rates by 2030.

. By some estimates this could cut global greenhouse gas emissions by 1.5 2.7 billion tons annually at a cost of just over $17 billion to $33 billion per year, but with a long-term benefit estimated at $3.7 trillion in present value terms.

. Under the Scolel Te Project in Mexico, some 700 farmers in 40 communities have planted over 700 hectares of trees on degraded land to sequester carbon receiving tens of thousands of dollars from the carbon offset markets-which in this case is linked with offsetting Formula One racing and the World Rally Championship.

Notes to Editors

The report "Dead planet, living planet: Biodiversity and ecosystem restoration for sustainable development" can be accessed at www.unep.org or at www.grida.no, including high and low resolution graphics for free use in publications.

"Dead planet, living planet: Biodiversity and ecosystem restoration for sustainable development" is being launched to mark World Environment Day in the UN's International Year of Biodiversity http://www.unep.org/wed/2010/english/

Rescuing Ecosystems Can Save Trillions Of Dollars: U.N.
Tim Cocks PlanetArk 4 Jun 10;
(Editing by Richard Lough and David Stamp)

A few million dollars invested by governments in restoring nature could prevent far greater losses of the free services that ecosystems provide to people around the world, a U.N. report said on Thursday.

In the study released before World Environment Day on June 5, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) said nations could boost their economies by replenishing dying forests, marshes, coral reefs and riverbanks.

"What are the real economic value of some of these resources? Wetlands, of which half have been destroyed, have an economic value of $7 trillion per year," Tim Kasten, a UNEP natural resources expert, told reporters in Nairobi.

"All together these services are providing up to $70 trillion per year of economic benefit," Kasten said.

UNEP warned the loss of ecosystem services could lead to a 25 percent loss in the world's food production by 2050.

The report, 'Dying Planet, Living Planet', says restoring wetlands helps to protect coastal regions from tropical storms and filter sewage out of water, while replanted forests provide vital drinking water for some of the world's largest cities.

Conservation efforts often focus on the dwindling chunks of nature that are still pristine, such as untouched parts of the Amazon forest or the Great Barrier Reef, but UNEP urged governments not to give up on heavily damaged ecosystems.

"Given that more than 60 per cent of them ranging from marshes ...to tropical forests ... are already degraded, restoration must now be an equal priority," it said.

The report says well planned programmes can usually recover between a quarter and a half of what was lost.

A study on restoring degraded grasslands around rivers in South Africa's Drakensberg Mountains showed it would return winter river flows of 4 million cubic meters of water.

Mangroves in India protect houses against monsoon storms, reducing the cost of repairs by four fifths on average.

"In Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, strict law enforcement, costing the lives of over 190 rangers, has helped restore the critically endangered mountain gorilla population ... generating large revenues from tourism," it said.

Other benefits of fixing a poorly looked after natural world include "restoring water flows to rivers and lakes, improved soil stability and fertility vital for agriculture and combating climate change by sequestrating and storing carbon."


Read more!

Jakarta City Reclamation Project ‘Disaster In the Making’

Arientha Primanita & Fidelis E. Satriastanti Jakarta Globe 4 Jun 10;

The Jakarta administration’s reclamation project off the north coast of the capital is susceptible to sea-related disasters and will add to the capital’s social and ecological problems, an environmental expert warned on Thursday.

The northern coast is already an environmental mess prone to flooding, and choked with stinking garbage brought in by the 13 rivers in the Greater Jakarta area, said Slamet Daryoni, chief of urban environmental education at the Indonesian Green Institute.

He said the project — to reclaim a 32-kilometer-long stretch of land in Jakarta Bay to provide an additional 2,700 hectares of land — had failed to pass an environmental impact analysis, or Amdal.

“The shore’s environmental problems will not be solved if this project continues. The problems of the northern coast will only be worked out through restoration, like building buffer zones through the mangroves along the coast,” Slamet said.

“This project will do nothing to mitigate flooding, nor will it make up for the lack of green space and water catchment areas from which the city suffers.”

The project will stretch 1.5 kilometers out to sea. The city plans to place commercial hubs on the small islands that are formed.

“This reclamation of 2,700 hectares will simply be a business-oriented project, as it will only the people with money who will be served by it,” Slamet said.

He added the reclamation was nothing more than a way to satisfy the capital’s growing need for even more luxury residences, hotels and shopping malls.

“Fishermen who make a living along the northern coast will definitely not be the ones to benefit from this project,” he said.

Defying a Supreme Court ruling, Jakarta Governor Fauzi Bowo said on Wednesday that the city would proceed with the project despite warnings from activists that it could have dire environmental consequences.

“We will take legal steps and we are going to request a judicial review of that verdict,” said Fauzi, adding that in the meantime his administration would restart the project.

The plan to reclaim the land was proposed in 1994, but sidelined in 2003 by the State Ministry for the Environment, after its environmental impact analysis was rejected.

Peni Susanti, the head of the Jakarta Environmental Management Agency, said the project would go ahead based on a law and a presidential decree.

Peni was referring to Law No. 26 of 2007 on spatial planning and Presidential Decree No. 54 of 2008 that regulate spatial planning in the Greater Jakarta area and Puncak and Cianjur areas of West Java.

“The city is already on the right track,” Peni said. Legal wrangling over the reclamation has raged ever since.

The contractors initially working on the project filed a suit to overturn the ministry’s ban in the Jakarta Administrative Court.

The court ruled in favor of the contractors, but the project remained suspended following the ministry’s appeal of the court’s decision.

In July 2009, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State Ministry for the Environment. But the decision was only forwarded to the Jakarta Administrative Court in March.

Urban planning expert Yayat Supriyatna, from Trisakti University, said Jakarta had no other option but to reclaim land to address the current shortage.

“Jakarta doesn’t have any more space to accommodate further development,” he said. “The question is, how will land be reclaimed and what materials will be used? Where are they going to get the mud or sand from to reclaim the land?”

Yayat said he feared developers would dredge the rivers to get the sand.

The administration says the reclaimed land will be able to accommodate 1.5 million people.

State Minister for the Environment Gusti Muhammad Hatta said his office had not received the Supreme Court ruling.

“I can’t say whether or not reclamation and development should be stopped, as I don’t know what the letter says.

But I do know it will mean lots of investment opportunities,” Gusti said.


Read more!

Q+A: Indonesia torn between forests, expanding oil palm

Niluksi Koswanage and Sunanda Creagh Reuters 3 Jun 10;

YOGYAKARTA Indonesia (Reuters) - When Indonesia last week secured its largest climate change funding of $1 billion from Norway, the Southeast Asian nation spelt out plans to revoke existing forestry licenses held by palm oil and timber firms.

Planters protested the proposals that aim to cut Indonesia's high rate of deforestation, saying they would hurt investments and oil palm estate expansion in the world's largest producer of palm oil.

The industry outcry then prompted the government to partially scale back its plans with assurances of honoring existing concessions.

But the policy flip-flops have unnerved investors who await concrete details on how the climate change funding and other aid from governments will impact the industry that brings in $15 billion in export revenues.

Here are some questions and answers about the issue:

WHERE DOES PALM OIL STAND IN THIS DEAL?

The palm oil industry appears to stand at the center of the climate change pact with Norway. Part of the funds will be used for loans to help small farmers boost yields and provide incentives for planters to use degraded lands to expand.

In the second phase, Indonesia has committed to suspend for two years new concessions for the conversion of its vast rainforests and peat swamps.

Forests absorb enormous amounts of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas blamed for global warming. Peat swamps lock away large stores of carbon, but draining them releases the carbon, leaving them prone to fire.

The aim of the moratorium is to compel planters to expand on the 6 million hectares (15 million acres) of degraded land across the archipelago, which officials of palm oil firms say may still have existing land rights issues and give lower yields.

Also, these lands may be scattered, making it difficult for planters to achieve economies of scale.

SO WHAT ABOUT REVOKING EXISTING FORESTRY CONCESSIONS?

For now, it remains just a possibility, after Chief Economic Minister Hatta Rajasa said the government would not revoke existing licenses.

Agus Purnomo, head of the secretariat of Indonesia's National Climate Change Council, said even if licenses have to be revoked, the government would proceed without "causing harm to the license holders" by offering compensation and land swaps.

Industry officials say planters likely to be affected include holders of lands that are too close to the rainforests and peatlands.

WHAT HAS BEEN THE IMPACT ON PLANTERS' SHARE PRICES?

None for the moment but investors say if existing concessions are revoked, players like Singapore's Wilmar and Malaysia's Sime and IOI Corp will be hit.

Many of these firms have unplanted areas of 100,000 and 200,000 hectares (250,000 to 500,000 acres) in Kalimantan on Borneo island as well as parts of Sumatra island.

The share prices of these firms, which tend to track Malaysian benchmark palm oil futures and have been losing ground over the European debt crisis, could face a beating.

COULD PALM OIL FIRMS SHIFT OUT OF INDONESIA?

Indonesia is still the preferred destination for oil palm expansion, especially for Malaysian planters as well as Wilmar, since oil palm estate conditions there are similar to Malaysia, the second largest palm oil producer in the world.

Almost all the top-five Malaysian listed planters, such as Sime, IOI Corp, KL Kepong and Genting Plantations have built up businesses in Indonesia and shifting out would create a much greater expense.

Plantation officials say they are most likely to negotiate with the government should existing permits be scrapped.

Planters may also consider Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands with their rich soils and hunger for investment, but could be deterred by concerns on crime and community anger over foreign firms forcing locals to work in substandard conditions.

(Additional reporting by David Fogarty; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)


Read more!

Indonesian Vice President launches "oil palm for people"

Antara 2 Jun 10;

Yogyakarta (ANTARA News) - Vice President Boediono here on Wednesday launched an Oil Palm for the People Program designed to improve the oil palm industry`s structure from upstream to downstream.

The vice president made the declaration by granting palm oil prime seedlings to representatives of farmers from Aceh and Bengkulu provinces on the sidelines of the International Oil Palm Conference 2010 (IOPC 2010).

"The oil palm industry has good prospects in the future because it is a much needed commodity in the various stages of economic development," the vice president said.

He added that there has yet to be a natural alternative energy source to oil palm as a supporting factor in economic development.

"In addition, demand for oil palm and its derivative products continues to increase in line with the pace of economic development and population growth," Vice President Boediono said.

Therefore, he said, the management of the oil palm industry should be improved so that optimal advantages would be derived.

"It has been said that 40 percent of the existing 7.8 million hectares of oil palm plantations belong to ordinary people, and therefore it can give great advantage not only to the farmers but also to the improvement of oil palm industry as a whole," the vice president said.

At the conference themed "Oil Palm Industry Transformation," the participants will discuss the progress in research work in palm oil producing countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Latin America, and Africa.

Besides, the conferees will also discuss data and facts about the impact of green house gas emissions on the oil palm industry.

The international oil palm conference which is to last until Thursday, June 3, 2010, is participated in by around 1,000 representatives from 23 countries.

Besides opening an exhibition and the international oil palm conference, the vice president is also scheduled to attend a gathering with students of senior high school SMAN-1 Teladan in Yogyakarta.(*)


Read more!

Greenpeace urges Indonesia to broaden forest moratorium

Yahoo News 3 Jun 10;

JAKARTA (AFP) – Greenpeace on Thursday said a promised moratorium on deforestation would have little impact on Indonesia's huge carbon footprint unless it is extended to existing concessions.

The environmental group also urged President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to begin the moratorium immediately instead of next year to prevent major new concessions being granted in the interim.

"The destruction of forests is still massive. President Yudhoyono needs to act fast," said Greenpeace Southeast Asia forest campaigner Zulfahmi, who like most Indonesians goes by only one name.

Yudhoyno announced the two-year moratorium in Oslo last month, cheering environmental activists but sending shudders through the country's massive palm oil industry blamed for much of the country's forest losses.

In exchange for verifiable cuts in deforestation, the Norwegian government agreed to provide a billion dollars in aid to help Indonesia preserve its forests.

Environmental groups have welcomed the initiative but say the details remain vague and question whether it will do much good as long as logging continues on existing concessions covering 1.8 million hectares (4.4 million acres).

"Without intervention on existing concessions, the president cannot achieve his commitment to reduce Indonesia's greenhouse gas emissions even by the promised 26 percent with or without international help," he said.

Yudhoyono has promised to cut Indonesia's emissions of climate-heating gases by 26 percent by 2020 and by 41 percent with international assistance.

Experts say Indonesia's forests are disappearing at a rate of about 300 football fields an hour, releasing vast amounts of greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

A report by a coalition including the BlueGreen Alliance and the Rainforest Action Network released in the United States last month found that 40 to 55 percent of Indonesia's timber is illegally harvested.

It warned that 98 percent of the archipelago's lowland forests could be gone by 2022.

Two-Year Moratorium Signed in Oslo Not Enough, Green Groups Complain
Fidelis E Satriastanti Jakarta Globe 4 Jun 10;

Although Indonesia’s recent commitment to a moratorium on forest concessions has been welcomed, green groups have criticized the government’s flip-flopping on the issue, its short-term vision and lack of enforcement.

Under the agreement signed by Indonesia and Norway in Oslo last week, Indonesia has pledged to stop issuing forestry permits for peatland and primary natural forests between 2011 and 2013.

The agreement sees Norway providing a $1 billion fund for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) schemes in Indonesian forests.

“While the moratorium is a good thing, you have to see this agreement in the context of ongoing international climate talks under way at the same time in which Indonesia’s position on a moratorium and indigenous people’s rights was never very clear,” Steni Bernard, REDD coordinator at the Climate Society Forum for Climate Justice, said on Friday.

The meeting he was referring to was the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change gathering in Bonn, Germany, which was held right after the Oslo Climate and Forest Conference, where the letter of intent was signed.

Steni said that at the UN talks, Indonesia did not mention targets for reducing deforestation, instead focusing on carbon trading and monitoring systems.

“It seems the government held different positions,” he said. “At the bilateral meeting, they agreed on a moratorium and on the participation of indigenous people. However, at the UN meeting, those two issues never came up.

“These are substantial issues that must be included in Indonesia’s policy to prevent the coordination from getting confused and messy.”

Teguh Surya, head of advocacy at the Indonesian Forum for the Environment (Walhi), agreed the moratorium was a step in the right direction, but called for a longer-term vision by the government.

“The forestry problems won’t go away once the two years are up and there’s no money left,” he said. “The impact from deforestation is very serious and the government needs to focus on the issue.”

He said Walhi had proposed additional recommendations to support the moratorium.

“In addition to not issuing new forestry licenses for peatland and primary forests, the government should focus on the most threatened areas,” Teguh said. “It also must ensure that all expired concessions are no longer being logged.”

Joko Arif, a forest campaigner at Greenpeace Southeast Asia, said it would take resolute political will to enforce the moratorium.

“Two weeks ago, we spoke with the government and they were adamant the moratorium would not be possible,” he said. “But now they’re very eager for it.

“We have good regulations in place, but the problem is in the implementation. It all goes back to the government’s political will.”

In the affected communities, the reaction has been pragmatic.

“I don’t know anything about REDD,” said villager Deli Saputra, from Kampar district in Riau. “All we ask is that the Indonesian people and the world help us protect our forests.

“Almost all the villagers here depend on the forest for our livelihoods, and if it keeps getting damaged, how are we expected to survive?”


Read more!

Elephants kill Riau villager trying to drive them away with firecrackers

Antara 3 Jun 10;
Bengkalis, Riau Province (ANTARA News) - Suwanto (32), a plantation guard at Petani village, Mandau sub district, Bengkalis District, Riau Province, died after being attacked by a herd of elephants Wednesday evening.

Suwanto`s body was crushed under the feet of the giant animals, according to witnesses Thursday.

Earlier, he and tens of other villagers had tried to drive away around 18 elephants from a rubber plantation using fire-crackers.

"At the time, we did not at all expect the elephants to become angry by our actions to drive them away," Junaidi (40), a neighbor of Suwanto, said.

The villagers were panic stricken when the elephants turned back and attacked them.
"We all just ran to save ourselves," he said.

One hour after the incident, they found Suwanto`s body near a bush in horrible condition. They took the body to a nearby hospital and later buried him.

The Sumatran elephant, the smallest of the Asian elephants, is facing serious pressures arising from illegal logging and associated habitat loss and fragmentation in Indonesia.

The island`s elephant population has come under increasing threat from rapid forest conversion to plantations.

As forests shrink, elephants are increasingly closer to fields and cultivated land, generating conflict with humans that often result in the death of the elephants by poisoning or capture, as well as economic losses to humans.(*)


Read more!

Poverty an obstacle to saving Liberia's rainforest

Fran Blandy Yahoo News 3 Jun 10;

JALAY TOWN, Liberia (AFP) – Six months pregnant and with two toddlers to feed, saving the rainforest isn't top of Marita Worjiloh's list of priorities right now.

A log lies smoking amid burned, jagged tree stumps as Marita tosses seeds into the fertile soil gouged out of Liberia's jungle.

She knows this traditional method of slash-and-burn farming is decimating woodlands, but "if I had something to do to make money I won't cut the forest down, because I know it is important."

"Without a forest we would not live a good life."

So while conservationists worry about preserving rainforests -- a powerful aid against climate change -- and the biodiversity they offer, it is poverty that drives this 23-year-old.

Liberia's forest makes up 42 percent of what is left of the Upper Guinean Rainforest -- just part of a fragmented system that once covered most of West Africa but has been reduced to 12 percent of its original reach.

The people of this west African nation have relied on the forest for food, medicine and even as a refuge during two successive civil conflicts from 1989 to 2003.

Villagers also have been razing large patches for farmland and hunting the wildlife for meat.

The threat of deforestation is real with about 70 percent of the population involved in slash-and-burn farming, said Johansen Voker, the acting executive director of Liberia's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

A traditional method used worldwide, slash-and-burn involves felling trees, burning their remains for nutrient-rich ash, and planting fast-growing crops such as rice and cassava.

The land should then be allowed to regenerate but pressure from burgeoning populations often decreases this fallow period and can lead to permanent loss of forest cover.

Despite efforts to introduce more sustainable ways to live off the forest, poverty is the biggest threat to biodiversity, said Voker, leading to illegal logging, mining and burning charcoal as fuel.

"It is poverty that drives people into burning charcoal as a source of fuel and it is poverty that drives people into the kind of unsustainable farming we are talking about," he said.

"What they think about is how they can cut down a tree to produce charcoal and that charcoal will put a bowl of rice on their table."

According to a 2010 report on deforestation by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Africa lost 3.4 million hectares of forest over the last decade, the second largest net loss after South America which includes the Amazon.

Africa's forest cover is concentrated in its western and central parts, but often in countries ravaged by war that has damaged their fragile environment through abuse of natural resources and massive population displacement.

In West Africa, wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone sent more than a million refugees fleeing across their borders into forested regions of Guinea and the Ivory Coast, one of the planet's most diverse biological regions.

For Richard Sambolah, technical adviser for the British-based organisation Fauna and Flora International, Liberia's conflict led to further exploitation of the forest.

"It just intensified poverty in the country," he added, "there are no jobs and so almost 80-90 percent of the population depends on the forest."

According to Voker, Liberia's agriculture ministry is trying to aid farmers to adapt to sustainable methods such as lowland or swamp farming which can be more profitable and increase yield.

"But the farmers have to make drastic changes... to adapt to this so-called new technology," he cautioned, and might be reluctant to ditch the familiarity of traditional upland farming.

Voker said Liberia was losing up to two percent of its forest cover every year. "If it is not checked you can imagine what happens 20 years from now... the forest will be gone."

As part of the persuasion process, in a nearby village Fiona Pamplin from Fauna and Flora International has trained a troupe to dance and act out a play explaining the devastating effects of cutting down the forests.

The message is clear, if not attractive.

"I am actually quite relieved to see that people do actually understand my message but they are always asking the question: So what are we supposed to do instead?" says Pamplin.


Read more!

Amazon up in smoke, even when deforestation slows

Alister Doyle Reuters 3 Jun 10;

OSLO (Reuters) - Brazilian farmers are setting more fires in parts of the Amazon where deforestation has slowed, according to a study on Thursday that shows weaknesses in a U.N. plan for slowing climate change.

Big fires, set by farmers to clear land for agriculture, are the main cause of deforestation but they continue to set smaller fires to maintain their plots -- and the damage is often hidden from satellite imaging because they burn under the tree canopy.

"This was a big surprise," Luiz Aragao, lead author of the study at the University of Exeter in England, told Reuters. "We thought that fires would decrease with less deforestation."

The extra blazes, used to clear regrowing trees and undergrowth and add nutrients to the soil, release large amounts of greenhouse gases stored in vegetation and so partly negate the climate benefits of a drive to brake deforestation.

"Fire occurrence has increased in 59 percent of the area that has experienced reduced deforestation rates," according to the scientists writing in the journal Science, based mainly on satellite images.

Aragao said that a pattern of more fires might also be true in other tropical forests, such as the Congo basin or parts of Asia which are seeking to slow forest loss under U.N. schemes.

In Brazil, extra fires often burned undergrowth in forests alongside farmland but the damage went unnoticed by satellites if the big trees were mostly intact.

CANOPY TRICKERY

"Farmers plant pasture under the large trees and you can't see it from a satellite. It still counts as a forest because of the canopy cover," Aragao said.

U.N. estimates are that deforestation accounts for up to a fifth of all greenhouse gases released by human activities, led by the burning of fossil fuels. Plants soak up heat-trapping carbon as they grow and release it when they rot or are burned.

Climate negotiators from 185 nations are meeting in Bonn from May 31-June 11 to work on a U.N. deal to slow global warming. The talks include a project known as REDD -- Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation.

Aragao said any U.N. deal should take account of the risks of more fires -- especially since most models of climate change predict a drying of the Amazon region in coming decades. Most Amazon fires are set by people, rather than by lightning.

He said any U.N. REDD programmes should encourage farmers to drop traditional reliance on fires. "That would increase the costs of REDD," he said, since farmers would need training and access to machinery such as tractors.

Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has meant a loss of 19,000 sq km (7,300 sq mile) of forest a year from 1998-2007, releasing 280 million tonnes of carbon a year, the study said.

In recent years of drought, extra fires probably emitted as much carbon as deliberate clearing of trees, the study said. That total was in turn comparable to an estimated 450 million tonnes of carbon soaked up by the forest every year.


Read more!