Singapore opens "green" airport terminal

Daryl Loo, Reuters 9 Jan 08;

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Singapore opened a new "green" airport terminal on Wednesday, boasting energy-saving skylights, a butterfly garden and over 200 species of foliage spread over enough floor space to cover 50 soccer fields.

The S$1.75 billion ($1.22 billion) terminal at state-owned Changi Airport received its first passengers, who landed on a Singapore Airlines flight from San Francisco amidst a high-powered welcoming committee including government ministers.

The new terminal, Singapore's third, boosts Changi's total passenger capacity by around 45 percent to 70 million, as airports throughout Asia expand to gear up for predictions of strong growth in regional travel.

Among the 28 aerobridge gates in the terminal are eight that are specially designed to handle the new Airbus A380, the world's largest passenger jet, the first of which is being flown by Singapore Airlines.

But booming air travel is seen by environmentalists as bad news for greenhouse emissions, with aviation likely to be a controversial topic in discussions run by the United Nations to choose a pact to follow the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.

The terminal is designed to run on lower energy costs compared to the older terminals, mainly via natural lighting from the 919 skylights and by positioning air-conditioners nearer to floor-level.

"The cost to run the terminal should be lower. But it's still too early to project what the cost-savings will be," said a spokesman from the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore, which manages the airport.

The terminal has a striking five-storey high wall of hanging plants, a butterfly garden and koi ponds dotted amid its gleaming 380,000 square meters (4 million sq ft).

But for Australian traveler Dawn Massey, 51, transiting with her husband on a flight back to Perth from the United Kingdom, the green features were barely noticeable.

"That's not something very important to us," said Massey, adding that she was more impressed with the new terminal's cleanliness and orderly signs.

"It's very reflective of Singapore actually," she said. The city-state has long cultivated a reputation as a "garden city" and is also well-known for the cleanliness of its streets, where chewing gum is banned and littering draws heavy fines.

Singapore is competing against Hong Kong and Bangkok to be the region's top aviation hub.

($1=1.430 Singapore Dollar)

(Editing by Neil Chatterjee)


Read more!

Dispute over welfare of 130 cats to involve authorities

Channel NewsAsia 9 Jan 08;

SINGAPORE: What started as a row among animal lovers has now grown into something that will soon involve the authorities.

The dispute revolves around the welfare of some 130 cats at Ericsson Pet Farm in Pasir Ris Farmway 2.

The tenant of the lot, Lilly Low, took in stray cats and moved her charges to the space at Ericsson Pet Farm in September last year. She has, apparently, been caring for cats for ten years.

According to a neighbour, Ms Low fell out with the person who helped her with the costs of taking care of the cats and has allegedly refused help from other people.

This has resulted in a lack of funds to pay for rent and food.

But Ms Low denied this, she said: "I don't starve the animals. I starve myself. I survive on cup noodles. I have been feeding them every day. In fact, three times a day."

Ms Low admitted that she had been receiving about S$500 a month for the past two months from a sponsor. The money was used to help defray the total cost of caring for the cats, which amounts to about S$2,560 per month. This includes the over S$1,700 in monthly rent.

The financial contribution is not written in a contract.

The person who reported the situation, James Tan, claimed the cats were underfed for the past couple of days because the owner had to leave the premises.

He said other tenants had been trying to feed the cats through the fence.

But the owner of the pet farm said he was not aware of the situation.

Eric Lim, director of Ericsson Pet Farm, said: "A lot of cat feeders like to mind other people's business. I always tell them, 'Mind your own business. Look after your own animals'."

The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) said it was refused entry to the pet farm so it would channel its report to the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) on Thursday.

Those found guilty of cruelty to animals can be fined a maximum of S$10,000 or sentenced to 12 months' jail, or both.- CNA/so


Read more!

New Bans on Plastic Bags May Help Protect Marine Life

Alana Herro, WorldWatch Institute 9 Jan 08;

At least 267 different species are known to have suffered from entanglement or ingestion of marine debris, and plastics and other synthetic materials cause the most problems for marine animals and birds.

China’s surprise crackdown on plastic bags, announced on Tuesday, will prohibit the production and distribution of ultra-thin bags beginning June 1. The ruling bans the manufacture, sale, and use of plastic bags under 0.025 millimeters thick and prohibits supermarkets and shops nationwide from handing out the sacks for free.

With the move, China joins a growing list of regions, from San Francisco to South Africa, that are using taxes, bans, and other regulations to try to decrease the prevalence of the ubiquitous bags.

Some 4 to 5 trillion plastic bags—including large trash bags, thick shopping bags, and thin grocery bags—were produced globally in 2002, according to the Worldwatch Institute’s State of the World 2004 report.

Roughly 80 percent of those bags were used in North America and Western Europe. Every year, Americans reportedly throw away 100 billion plastic grocery bags, which can clog drains, crowd landfills, and leave an unsightly blot on the landscape.

Perhaps less widely known is the destructive impact that plastic bags have on oceans and marine life. Tossed into waterways or washed down storm drains, the bags are the major source of human-related debris on the seabed, particularly near coastlines, according to the 2007 Worldwatch report Oceans in Peril: Protecting Marine Biodiversity.

At least 267 different species are known to have suffered from entanglement or ingestion of marine debris, and plastics and other synthetic materials cause the most problems for marine animals and birds.

Every year, tens of thousands of whales, birds, seals, and turtles die from contact with ocean-borne plastic bags. The animals may mistake the bags for food, such as jellyfish, or simply become entangled. Plastic bags can take up to 1,000 years to break down, so even when an animal dies and decays after ingesting a bag, the plastic re-enters the environment, posing a continuing threat to wildlife. While most plastic bags eventually break down into tiny particles, smaller sea creatures may still eat the sand-sized fragments and concentrate toxic chemicals in their bodies.

In addition to the bans, taxes, and other government policies now in place to fight the plastic-bag scourge in countries like Bangladesh, Ireland, Kenya, and Taiwan, a variety of responses have emerged in the business community. Some companies now manufacture and purchase biodegradable bags or bags made from recycled materials, and a growing number offer in-store recycling for the receptacles. Although recycling the petroleum-based bags is not always cost-effective, one ton of recycled plastic bags can save 11 barrels of oil, according to an estimate in EJ Magazine.

Other responses include manual cleanups and bans on dumping plastic from ships at sea. Many anti-plastic-bag advocates support the commonsense approach offered by the Chinese government. “We should encourage people to return to carrying cloth bags, using baskets for their vegetables,” said a notice posted on the central government website.

RELATED ARTICLE

China Launches Surprise Crackdown on Plastic Bags

Guo Shipeng and Emma Graham-Harrison, PlanetArk 9 Jan 08;


Read more!

Vietnam police find two live tigers in a car in Hanoi

Ngo Xuan Tung, Yahoo News 9 Jan 08;

Vietnamese police came face-to-face with two live tigers they found in a passenger car in central Hanoi when they busted an illegal wildlife trafficking gang this week, media reports said Wednesday.

The wild cats had been sedated by the animal smugglers but awoke after the police raid and started chewing up the seats and interior of the car that the traffickers had used to take the tigers to a client in the capital.

Officers from the Hanoi Environmental Police had to knock the 50-kilogram (110-pound) carnivores out again with drugs to take them to a wild animal rescue centre after the bust Monday evening, state media said.

When they searched the traffickers' homes on the outskirts of Hanoi, police found four more tigers cut up in a freezer, seven live bears and bear parts, rhinoceros horns and elephant tusks, the An Ninh Thu Do newspaper said.

Two people were detained by police, reports said.

One of them told police that he had in the past bought two tiger carcasses from a Hanoi zoo, the Thanh Nien daily reported.

Vietnam, where poachers have decimated wildlife in most forests, is a major trafficking hub for the illegal trade, linking supplier countries such as Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar with consumers in China and elsewhere.

With rising affluence, Vietnam has also become a growing destination for wildlife meat and the wines and medicines made from the animals which have traditionally been believed to have healing and tonic properties.

"It just illustrates that the trade is going on unabated," said Sulma Warne, regional coordinator of the wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC.

A tiger's skin, meat and bones can fetch up to 25,000 dollars, Warne said.

"If something is not done about this -- and the people involved are not appropriately punished so that they won't do it again -- it won't be long until there are no more tigers left in this part of the world," he told AFP.

With Vietnam's rainforests now reduced to a patchwork, fewer than 100 tigers, 100 elephants and 10 rhinos are believed to survive in the wild.

Exploitation for the illegal trade now rivals habitat destruction as a major threat to the survival of many species in Southeast Asia, experts say.

Communist Vietnam has signed treaties against the trade, including the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, but enforcement remains patchy due to limited funding and corruption.

Authorities have booked some successes in recent months, arresting four people in September who were caught preparing two dead tigers and other illegal wildlife for traditional medicine in a Hanoi city apartment.

In that raid, police also found ivory tusks, a stuffed tiger, more than 10 cow heads, three deer heads and large alcohol bottles filled with snakes.

Last month, a Ho Chi Minh City court jailed eight men for up to 11 years for poisoning a tiger to sell its body parts for medicinal balm.

In the latest bust, police said the tigers had been bought as cubs from a trader for a total of 7,000 dollars and kept caged in a city district since last July, and were being sold to a client for 20,000 dollars.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 9 Jan 08


Labrador Episode 4: A New Hope
in the spirit of StarWars Episode 4, some fresh hope for this beleaguered shore on the justin dive blog

Under Protection?
Return to Labrador by a former student of the shore on the labrador blog

Relaxing Ubin Exploration
a day off for intrepid shore volunteers to explore the more terrestrial side of ubin on the wonderful creations blog

Freshwater life in a stream at Thomson Ridge
on the johora singaporensis blog

Arrival of the Peregrin Falcon
on the bird ecology blog

Super-Green City of the Future?
The island model for eco-living and urban sustainability, is an entirely man-made 400-acre property in the middle of the San Francisco Bay on the daily galaxy blog

Can cars get too cheap?
on the reuters environment blog


Read more!

F.T.C. Asks if Carbon-Offset Money Is Well Spent

By Louise Story
New York Times 9 Jan 2008

Corporations and shoppers in the United States spent more than $54 million last year on carbon offset credits toward tree planting, wind farms, solar plants and other projects to balance the emissions created by, say, using a laptop computer or flying on a jet.

But where exactly is that money going?

The Federal Trade Commission, which regulates advertising claims, raised the question Tuesday in its first hearing in a series on green marketing, this one focusing on carbon offsets.

As more companies use offset programs to create an environmental halo over their products, the commission said it was growing increasingly concerned that some green marketing assertions were not substantiated. Environmentalists have a word for such misleading advertising: “greenwashing.”

With the rapid growth of green programs like carbon offsets, “there’s a heightened potential for deception,” said Deborah Platt Majoras, chairwoman of the commission.
The F.T.C. has not updated its environmental advertising guidelines, known as the Green Guides, since 1998. Back then, the agency did not create definitions for phrases that are common now — like renewable energy, carbon offsets and sustainability.

For now, it is soliciting comments on how to update its guidelines and is gathering information about how carbon-offset programs work.

Consumers seem to be confronted with green-sounding offers at every turn. Volkswagen told buyers last year that it would offset their first year of driving by planting in what it called the VW Forest in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley (the price starts at $18).

Dell lets visitors to its site fill their shopping carts with carbon offsets for their printers, computer monitors and even for themselves (the last at a cost of $99 a year).

Continental Airlines lets travelers track the carbon impact of their itineraries.

General Electric and Bank of America will translate credit card rewards points into offsets.

Most suppliers of carbon offsets say that the cost of planting a tree is roughly $5, and the tree must live for at least 100 years to fully compensate for the emissions in question. By comparison, an offset sold by Dell for three years’ use of a notebook computer costs $2.

To supply and manage the carbon offsets, big consumer brands are turning to a growing number of little-known companies, like TerraPass, and nonprofits, like Carbonfund.org. These intermediaries also cater to corporations that want to become “carbon-neutral” by purchasing offsets for the carbon dioxide they release.

Ms. Majoras of the F.T.C. pointed out that spokesmen for events like the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards have recently started saying that their events are carbon-neutral (though the Academy Awards drew criticism for the way its offsets were handled).

The F.T.C. has not accused anyone of wrongdoing — neither the providers of carbon offsets nor the consumer brands that sell them. But environmentalists say — and the F.T.C.’s hearings suggest — that it is only a matter of time until the market faces greater scrutiny from the government or environmental organizations.

“Is there green substance behind the green sparkle?” said Daniel C. Esty, director of the Center for Business and the Environment at Yale University and author of “Green to Gold,” a book about how companies use environmental strategies to their advantage. “The carbon market is a leading example of the challenge of making sure that when people put their money into what they hope will improve their planet, that there is real follow-through.”

Carbon offsets are essentially promises to use money in a way that will reduce carbon emissions. Panelists at the F.T.C.’s session on Tuesday raised a number of questions about certifications behind the claims, wondering if the offset companies might be double-counting carbon reductions that would have happened even without their efforts.

There is even disagreement over how much carbon dioxide can be neutralized by tree-planting, which is the type of offset that is easiest to grasp.

Carbonfund.org, for example, which provides offsets to companies like Amtrak, U-Haul and Allstate, uses the offset money in three ways: to plant trees; to subsidize wind and solar power so that it can be sold at more competitive prices; and to purchase credits on the Chicago Climate Exchange, which barters among hundreds of companies trying to reduce their emissions.

Even the companies that market carbon offsets say they have wondered if the providers were living up to their promises. When Gaiam, a yoga-equipment company, began selling offsets for shipping to consumers through the Conservation Fund, a nonprofit organization, Chris Fischer, the company’s general manager, says he insisted on visiting one of the tree sites in Louisiana.

“Not only did I want to know it existed, I wanted to make sure it was being done the way they said it was being done,” Mr. Fischer said. “It’s not just ‘did they do it?’ — it’s ‘did they do it right?’”

Gaiam has sold more than $200,000 in offset credits in the last two years, Mr. Fischer said.

Other companies have not had immediate success marketing the offsets. Last spring, Delta Air Lines began selling flight offsets — $5.50 for domestic round-trips, and $11 for international ones — but has so far not sold as many as it hoped, said Jena Thompson, director of Go Zero program at the Conservation Fund, which manages Delta’s offsets.

Delta is trying to draw more attention to the program this month by setting up a carbon-offset kiosk at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah.

The airline did not consider increasing all ticket prices by the cost of carbon offsets because customers are price-sensitive, a spokeswoman, Betsy Talton, said.

Volkswagen has provided free offsets to everyone who purchased a car in the last five months. The offsets cover a year of driving for a typical driver, a spokesman, Keith Price, said. The company also gave customers the chance to buy offsets for additional years, an option that Mr. Price said had proved most popular in Southern California and the suburbs of Boston.


Read more!

The great Singapore squeeze: population density discussed

Beat the weekend crowds – take a weekday off instead
Overcrowding will inevitably cause social tension
Today Online 9 Jan 08;

Letter from JEFFREY LAW LEE BENG
Letter from DENNIS BUTLER

I read with interest Mr John Lucas' letter, "Do we want to be No 1 for population density?" (Weekend Today, Jan 5-6).

The quality of life need not be adversely affected in a densely-populated country if we are innovative enough to plan and able to make changes to lifestyles.

Given the typical five-day work week here, places of interest are inevitably crowded on the weekends.

Must we plan visits to places such as East Coast Park and Bukit Timah Nature Reserve on weekends? Why can't we do so on a weekday? Applying for a day off to spend time with your family isn't too much to ask for, isn't it?

On weekdays, you can shop in comfort as the malls are less crowded. Finding a parking lot is a breeze.

I believe we need to increase our population to beef up our workforce. And with the development of more tourism-related infrastructure, more people will be required to work round-the-clock.

Reaching the 6-million population target will also necessitate lifestyle changes and we may have to work staggered hours. Business hours for shops and services may also have to be extended.


I refer to Mr John Lucas' letter and find it hard to reconcile the need to maintain social cohesion with the Government's plans to expand the population to 6 million or more in land-sparse Singapore.

And thanks to the tacit acceptance and encouragement of disruptive en bloc sales, condominium residents like me risk being forced into pigeonhole-like structures that are being constructed in this current property boom.

To me, this seems to be part of a policy to squeeze us into even closer proximity to make room for a denser population.

I realise that Singapore cannot afford to stand still, but if more people are put on this island, we will become gridlocked into immobility. I don't understand how overcrowding — and the tensions that will arise — will contribute to the quality of life in Singapore.


Read more!

Jakarta drafts Bill on waste disposal to prevent floods

Straits Times 9 Jan 08;

JAKARTA - A FIRST-EVER Bill on garbage disposal has been drafted, with the Indonesian government hoping that it will help the country prevent recurring flood problems.

The Bill, which threatens fines and jail time for those who dispose of garbage in rivers, aims to counter the absence of regulations on garbage disposal, which the government believes is behind current flood disasters in several regions.

State Minister for the Environment Rachmat Witoelar said garbage-clogged rivers triggered flooding, especially in urban areas.

'It is common for people to dump garbage into rivers,' he said at a recent press conference.

'That's why, once we have the waste management law, I promise to implement it seriously. There won't be any compromise as regards violators.'

The Bill is expected to be passed this year. It deals with the reduction and disposal of garbage and covers the daily activities of the public, such as prohibiting dumping and burning of garbage in open areas. If passed, the law would also require households to separate organic and non-organic garbage.

Garbage in the country's urban areas, most of which comes from households, has long been a sensitive issue.

The sanctions available for improper garbage disposal will be further elaborated within regional ordinances.

As a basic outline, the Bill provides for a fine of up to 2 billion rupiah (S$300,000) or five years' jail for bringing waste into Indonesian territory.

Fines of 1.5 billion rupiah or a three-year sentence would apply to those operating recycling and other waste businesses without permits from the ministry.

JAKARTA POST/ASIA NEWS NETWORK


Read more!

Malaysia: Flour shortage next?

Carolyn Hong Straits Times 9 Jan 08;

KUALA LUMPUR - WITH global wheat prices at a record high, Malaysia runs the risk of running short of flour. Restaurant owners are complaining of being unable to get stock at old prices.

Datuk Ramalingam Pillai, president of the Malaysian Indian Restaurant Owners' Association, told the New Straits Times: 'We have run out of flour and are finding it tough to secure further supply at reasonable prices.'

The Malaysian Muslim Restaurant Owners' Association has also complained that its members have to pay more for flour.

The situation is a result of the rapidly escalating price of wheat globally, said Flour Millers Association secretary Thong Kok Mun. He told The Straits Times that the government price controls were set more than 10 years ago, when the price of wheat was about four times lower.

The price of flour for household use, generally that sold in 1kg packets, is fixed at RM1.35 (60 Singapore cents) per kg. Flour for commercial use is not subject to price controls and costs RM2.30 to RM2.90 a kg. 'There is a big difference in price,' he said, noting that this might encourage big users to buy up small packets.

He said there was no real shortage of flour, as demand and supply had remained steady at 75,000 tonnes a month for the last one year.

But millers began warning last year that a flour shortage could arise as they were losing money on every bag of flour sold because of the price controls, making it tough for them to purchase new stocks of wheat. It now costs more than RM2,000 to produce a tonne of flour, while the retail price is RM1,350 a tonne.

Any shortage is unlikely to affect Singapore. Mr Thong noted that Malaysia exported only small quantities to the Republic.

Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Shafie Apdal yesterday stressed that the situation would be resolved soon as Malaysia's biggest miller, the Federal Flour Mills, had agreed to increase its production of price-controlled flour.

Datuk Ramalingam was reported to have met Datuk Shafie and asked for flour and cooking oil for his members.

He promised that the association would not increase food prices as it was getting new stocks.

CAROLYN HONG


Read more!

China defends its fish farming sector

Business Times 9 Jan 08

98% of its aquatic exports meet standards: minister

(BEIJING) China defended its fish farming industry yesterday, saying that it was making progress in curbing the use of illegal additives such as pesticides, as its food safety record remains in the spotlight.

China has suffered scares over the safety of its food and manufactured products in the last year that highlighted shoddy oversight and prompted many new regulations and clean-up campaigns from the central government.

Vice-Minister of Agriculture Gao Hongbin said that China had made 'encouraging progress'.

'However, regulation of quality and safety of agricultural products is still faced with arduous challenges due to a number of factors. There is still a gap between China's standards and those in other countries,' he told a news conference.

The government has curbed the use of highly toxic pesticides in vegetable production and was making progress in stamping out the use of clenbuterol, a steroid used in pork production that is illegal in China, said Mr Gao.

He also said that the compliance rate for the use of three toxins used in fish production was rising, and he defended China's fish farming against a New York Times piece entitled 'Fishing in Toxic Waters'.

'It is a question of common sense. Do you believe that fish can live in toxic water? Personally, I believe that this report is sensational and misleading,' he said.

The United States said last June that it would disallow Chinese farm-raised seafood imports unless shipments were proven to be free from harmful residues. Mr Gao said that 98 per cent of China's aquatic products exports met standards.

China also wants to assure the millions descending on Beijing for the Olympic Games this August that its food will be of the highest quality.

Mr Gao said: 'With regard to where the food will come from, undoubtedly it will come from China. I will not rule out the possibility that some could be imported from abroad.' - Reuters

China rubbishes 'toxic fish farms' report
Straits Times 9 Jan 08;

Top official slams NYT report on toxic fish farms, says most exports meet health standards

BEIJING - A SENIOR Chinese official yesterday defended China's fish farming industry against a New York Times (NYT) article entitled Farming Fish In Toxic Waters, slamming the report as 'sensational and misleading'.

Vice-Minister of Agriculture Gao Hongbin said that there were many safeguards in place for aquatic products and that at least 98 per cent of China's aquatic exports met standards.

According to the Dec 15 NYT report, China has become the biggest producer and exporter of seafood in the world, but the growth is threatened by two environmental problems: acute water shortages and water supplies contaminated by sewage, industrial waste and agricultural run-off that includes pesticides.

'Farmers have coped with the toxic waters by mixing illegal veterinary drugs and pesticides into fish feed, which helps keep their stocks alive yet leaves poisonous and carcinogenic residues in seafood, posing health threats to consumers,' the NYT said.

Mr Gao said that the compliance rate for the use of three toxins applied in fish production, including malachite green, a possible cancer-causing chemical used to treat fungal infections in fish, was rising.

Defending China's fish farming against the NYT piece, he told a news conference: 'It is a question of common sense. Do you believe that fish can live in toxic water?

'Personally, I believe that this report is sensational and misleading.'

The United States said last June that it would not allow imports of Chinese farm-raised catfish, shrimp and other seafood unless suppliers could prove that shipments were free from harmful residues, including malachite green.

China has suffered a rash of scares over the safety of its food and manufactured products last year, which highlighted shoddy oversight.

A four-month-long national campaign, which began in August last year, to improve the quality of Chinese products has achieved encouraging progress, Mr Gao said.

But he noted that challenges remain.

'We have successfully completed our mission of improving the quality and safety,' he said. 'However, the regulation of quality and safety of agricultural products is still faced with arduous challenges.'

He added: 'There is still a gap between China's standards and those in other countries.'

The vice-minister said that the government has curbed the use of highly toxic pesticides in vegetable production and was making progress in stamping out the use of clenbuterol, a banned feed additive found in pork production.

Special attention will be paid at this August's Beijing Olympics to ensure that products in food markets are 'sufficient in quantity, high in quality, rich in variety and safe to eat', he said.

The Ministry of Agriculture was working with Olympic organisers to ensure food safety during the Games, he added.

The government plans to strengthen product inspection procedures and promote the standardisation of agricultural practices in order to establish standards that meet the needs of consumers as well as international requirements within three to five years.

'Our ultimate goal is to ensure that the food the Chinese people eat is safe,' he said.

REUTERS, ASSOCIATED PRESS


Read more!

New approach needed to save coral reefs

Michael Kahn, Reuters 8 Jan 08;

"The study showed clearly that the number of people living in close proximity to coral reefs is the main driver of mortality of corals,"

LONDON (Reuters) - A growing human population is pushing coral reefs in the Caribbean to breaking point and saving them will require a new, larger-scale approach, researchers said on Tuesday.

Coral reefs have long been under threat but pinpointing whether overfishing, climate change or development is the main culprit has proved both contentious and difficult, said Camilo Mora, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Canada.

In their study, researchers monitored coral reefs in 322 sites across 13 countries throughout the Caribbean and analyzed databases on fishing, sedimentation and population growth.

The team, which also looked at agricultural land use, temperature, hurricanes, coral disease and richness of the reefs, determined that coastal development was most harmful.

"The study showed clearly that the number of people living in close proximity to coral reefs is the main driver of mortality of corals," the researchers said in the study, which was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society.

More people means more of everything that damages coral reefs, including fishing, sewage, coastal construction and human activities that contribute to warming oceans.

Coral reefs, delicate undersea structures resembling rocky gardens that are made by tiny animals called coral polyps, are important nurseries and shelters for fish and other sea life.

They are also considered valuable protection for coastlines from high seas, a critical source of food for millions of people, important for tourism and a potential storehouse of medicines for cancer and other diseases.

But researchers and environmental groups have warned that coral reefs worldwide could be destroyed unless governments urgently change how they manage the marine ecosystem.

"This new study moves from the traditional localized study of threats to a region-wide scale," Mora and colleagues wrote.

The coral reef is critical to the Caribbean economy, generating $4 billion each year in trade for the fishing and tourism industries, as well as jobs for government workers responsible for monitoring the reefs, Mora said.

(Reporting by Michael Kahn, Editing by Maggie Fox and Jon Boyle)


Read more!

Southeast Asia's illegal pet trade threatens turtles: experts

Yahoo News 8 Jan 08;

A surge in demand for exotic freshwater turtles and tortoises in Southeast Asia is fuelling rampant illegal trade in the animals in Indonesia, wildlife experts warned Tuesday.

TRAFFIC Southeast Asia said its investigators discovered that 48 species of freshwater turtles and tortoises were sold in Indonesia's capital Jakarta and the vast majority were illegally obtained.

The wildlife trade monitoring group said they included all six of Indonesia's fully protected freshwater turtles and five non-native species listed in the CITES convention, which bans all commercial international trade.

TRAFFIC's senior programme officer Chris R. Shepherd urged Indonesia to step up enforcement to stop the illegal trade and nab the criminals.

"The open trade in protected species indicates a lack of enforcement effort and blatant disregard for the law. Dealers admitted to TRAFFIC that freshwater turtles and tortoises are smuggled in and out of Indonesia with ease," he said.

"TRAFFIC encourages the government of Indonesia to ensure combatting wildlife crime is given high priority, and that every effort is made to clamp down on the criminals involved," Shepherd said.

TRAFFIC is based in the Malaysian capital Kuala Lumpur.


Read more!

'No clear trend' in forest loss

Richard Black, BBC News 8 Jan 08;

Data on tropical forest cover is so poor that we do not know if the forests are declining, a study has found.

Alan Grainger from the UK's University of Leeds examined UN analyses going back almost 30 years, and found that "evidence for a decline is unclear".

Writing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), he proposes a global forest monitoring system.

The UN admits there are problems with the data, but says tropical forests are certainly in retreat.

Dr Grainger is not so sure. "People have been assuming that forest cover is shrinking," he told BBC News, "and certainly deforestation has been taking place on a large scale."

But, he says, there is also evidence that in some countries, forests are expanding spontaneously.

"Our analysis does not prove that tropical forest decline is not happening, merely that it is is difficult to demonstrate it convincingly using available tropical forest area data," he writes in PNAS.

Revised estimates

The UN reports are produced by the Rome-based Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in its regular global Forest Resources Assessments (FRAs).

Assembled principally using data from national forest authorities, the FRAs are widely regarded as the most accurate estimates available, which is why they are used by many researchers in the areas of forestry, land-use change and sustainability.

For his PNAS paper, Dr Grainger looked at the four most recent FRAs, published in 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2005.

Each of the individual reports showed a decline in tropical forest cover; but across the four reports, he found no trend was discernible.

This is largely because each assessment revised earlier estimates of cover. For example, in 1980 the FAO estimated natural tropical forests spanned 1,970 million hectares. But the 1990 assessment used a revised figure for 1980 of 1,910 million hectares.

The FAO says it made these revisions because better data became available, and because each assessment used different criteria.

"What you've got is a desire by the FAO for consistency inside each of its studies," commented Dr Grainger, "but that's come at the expense of consistency between studies."

Resource drain

"I agree totally that there are tremendous difficulties in tracking long-term trends in the area of tropical forest, although we are witnessing some improvements," responded Mette Loyche Wilkie, a senior forestry officer at FAO who co-ordinated the 2005 FRA.

"We know that very few countries in the world undertake regular assessments; in the tropics, that's primarily due to lack of resources," she said.

"In Africa, for example, a number of countries undertook national inventories in the 1970s and 1980s, funded by external donors; and very few have reported inventories since then; donors, and the countries themselves, have had other priorities."

Despite these difficulties, she believes the assessments have shown clearly that tropical forest cover is declining.

"We saw this clearly for example in the 2000 assessment, where we undertook a remote sensing survey of tropical countries and it was very clear there had been a decline during the period 1980-2000."

In preparing for its 2010 assessment, the FAO is planning a survey of current and historical satellite data to give higher-quality estimates of forest extent, and to establish uniform and consistent standards between countries.

Alan Grainger agrees that such an analysis is needed. But he urges going further, advocating the establishment of a World Forest Observatory to monitor developments precisely.

"What is happening to the tropical forests is so important, both to the peoples of tropical countries and to future trends in biodiversity and global climate, that we can no longer put off investing in an independent scientific monitoring programme that can combine satellite and ground data to give a reliable picture," he said.

Political initiatives to tackle climate change have renewed the interest of some western governments in tropical forestry.

If richer nations are to pay poorer ones to protect forests - a concept which appears likely to form a centrepiece of a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol - monitoring changes in cover will become a high priority.


Read more!

Paper giant illegally clearing Indonesian forests: environmentalists

Yahoo News 9 Jan 08;

Rare elephants, tigers and orangutans are under threat from illegal land clearing on Indonesia's Sumatra island by one of Asia's biggest pulp and paper companies, environmentalists said Tuesday.

Regional giant Asia Pulp and Paper (APP) and affiliates are clearing land and building an access road outside their legal concessions in the Bukit Tigapuluh area of Sumatra's Jambi province, a coalition of five environmental groups said in a press release accompanying a new joint report.

"From our surveys and other NGO surveys we know this is a very critical habitat for tigers, elephants and recently introduced orangutans," Desmarita Murni, a campaigner with WWF, one of the groups, told AFP.

Bukit Tigapuluh is one of only two viable habitats for Sumatran elephants, along with Tesso Nilo forest in neighbouring Riau province, which is also under threat, Murni said.

Satellite images in November 2007 showed 20,000 hectares (49,200 acres) had already been illegally cleared by APP and related companies, Murni said.

Murni said some of the areas were still being auctioned off by the government, and were not yet legally open for clearing.

APP and affiliates were also breaking the law by creating forest plantations near vital watershed environments, she added.

The groups are requesting that APP observe a moratorium on land clearing and carry out an impact study on the environmental importance of the forest area, which is also home to indigenous peoples who rely on the forest for their livelihood.

APP and affiliated companies are already facing an Indonesian national police investigation into illegal logging in Riau. APP is observing a moratorium on landclearing in that province while the investigation continues.

APP spokeswoman Aida Greenbury told AFP that the company was not involved in illegal logging in Bukit Tigapuluh, but had not had time to look in detail into the groups' allegations.

Illegal logging is widespread in Indonesia, where legal confusion and weak institutions mean offenders are rarely brought to account.

Rates of legal deforestation also alarm environmentalists, with land clearing for palm oil, pulp and paper helping make Indonesia the world's third-highest carbon emitter.

RELATED LINKS

Illegal logging and road building threatens tigers and tribes of the Heart of Sumatra

WWF 7 Jan 08;


Read more!

Tropical dengue fever may threaten U.S.: report

Yahoo News 9 Jan 08;

Dengue fever -- a tropical infection that usually causes flu-like illness -- may be poised to spread across the United States and urgent study is needed, health officials said on Tuesday.

Cases of the sometimes deadly mosquito-borne disease have been reported in Texas and this may be the beginning of a new trend, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and his senior scientific adviser, Dr. David Morens.

A warming climate and less-than-stellar efforts to control mosquitoes could accelerate its spread northwards, they cautioned.

"Widespread appearance of dengue in the continental United States is a real possibility," they wrote in a commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"Worldwide, dengue is among the most important reemerging infectious diseases, with an estimated 50 to 100 million annual cases, 500,000 hospitalizations and, by World Health Organization estimates, 22,000 deaths, mostly in children."

They compared dengue to West Nile virus, which first appeared in New York in 1999 and has now spread to the entire continental United States, Canada and Mexico. West Nile killed at least 98 people in the United States last year.

Both viruses are carried by mosquitoes. Dengue can be carried by the Aedes albopictus or Asian tiger mosquito -- first seen in 1985 in the United States -- as well as the more common Aedes aegypti species.

Most people infected with a dengue virus have no symptoms or a mild fever. It can cause minor bleeding from the nose or gums, but can also cause severe fever and shock and without treatment can kill.

"The combined effects of global urbanization and increasing air travel are expected to make dengue a growing international health problem for the foreseeable future," Fauci and Morens wrote.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox; editing by Julie Steenhuysen and Todd Eastham)


Read more!

Could sea power solve the energy crisis?

The Telegraph 8 Jan 08;

As Gordon Brown steers Britain towards a nuclear future, Dominic Michaelis, Alex Michaelis and Trevor Cooper-Chadwick suggest we turn to the oceans instead.

The French inventor Georges Claude is largely forgotten today; if he is remembered at all, it is as the creator of the neon lamp. Yet one of his projects from the 1920s could resolve the global energy crisis - by harnessing the power of the oceans.

It may sound like science fiction, but Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is an idea whose time has come. It is based on the work of Jacques-Arsène d'Arsonval, a 19th-century French physicist who thought of using the sea as a giant solar-energy collector.

The theory is very simple: OTEC extracts energy from the difference in temperature between the surface of the sea (up to 29C in the tropics) and the waters a kilometre down, which are typically a chilly 5C. This powers a "heat engine": think of a refrigerator in reverse, in which a temperature difference creates electricity.

Claude's efforts to develop a practical version of d'Arsonval's concept had to be abandoned due to poor weather and a lack of funds.

But a modern equivalent would meet much of the world's energy needs, without generating polluting clouds of carbon and sulphur dioxide. It could also produce vast quantities of desalinated water to be shipped to parched areas of the world such as Africa.

There are two basic versions of the technology. The first operates in a "closed cycle", using warm surface water to heat ammonia, which boils at a low temperature. This expands into vapour, driving a turbine that produces electricity. Cold water from the depths is used to cool the ammonia, returning it to its liquid state so the process can start again.

The "open cycle" version offers the added benefit of producing drinking water as a by-product.

Warm seawater is introduced into a vacuum chamber, in which it will boil more easily, leaving behind salt and generating steam to turn a turbine. Once it has left the turbine, the steam enters a condensing chamber cooled by water from the depths, in which large quantities of desalinated water are produced - 1.2 million litres for every megawatt of energy.

A 250MW plant (a sixth of the capacity of the new coal-fired power station that has just won planning permission in Kent) could produce 300 million litres of drinking water a day, enough to fill a supertanker. Using electrolysis, it would also be possible to produce hydrogen fuel.

Such a vision is far removed from the first OTEC plant, constructed by Claude in 1930 in Matanzas Bay, Cuba, where the sea plunges to great depths close to the shore. After several failures - including the loss of two of the pipes used to suck up cold water from the sea - Claude produced 22,000 watts of electricity from this early prototype.

This is a very small amount, enough to heat five well insulated houses. But it confirmed that his calculations worked, and that both electricity and drinking water could be produced by the sea.

When a later version was installed on a converted boat in Brazil, Claude found a use for this desalinated water: he froze it to make ice, a valuable commodity at the time. The boat, however, was damaged in a storm and the project abandoned.

Similar difficulties have beset the many subsequent attempts to turn principle into practice, but with oil at $100 a barrel, and with pressure growing to arrest the effects of climate change, the conditions are right for OTEC to make a comeback.
advertisement

In fact, there is no need to stop at OTEC as the sole technology. If you are going to build an offshore platform, it makes sense to harness its space to create an "energy island" - a facility that uses a variety of alternative energies, such as wind, wave and solar, to generate enough power to pump the huge quantities of water from the sea and run the vacuum pumps of the OTEC plant.

Not only would these "islands" be self-sufficient, but several could be linked to generate energy outputs of around 1,000MW, rivalling the output of a typical nuclear plant. The cost, according to our models, would be roughly double that of a nuclear power station.

This might seem expensive, but an OTEC plant would not involve the waste-treatment or astronomical decommissioning costs of a nuclear facility. Also, it would offset its expense through the sale of the desalinated water.

This is in addition to the other advantages: carbon-free energy production and no generation of heat. In fact, the plants would cool the seas and oceans by the same amount as the energy extracted from them.

The energy islands would mainly be built from reinforced concrete, using corrosion-resistant metals, but they would come in different sizes and with different functions: some would be simple energy-generating platforms, while others would be larger installations, linked to the land by cable, along which the electricity could be distributed (this would involve superconductors, materials that lose all resistance to electricity when cooled, minimising energy loss in transmission).

And energy generation would not be their only function. Larger islands could support fish farms that used the plankton pumped up along with the cold seawater, as well as pods for heliports, greenhouses, accommodation and maintenance areas, facilities for producing sea salt and harbours and mooring for supertankers.

These tankers would collect the desalinated water or the hydrogen produced by electrolysis, which could both be shipped to energy- and water-scarce parts of the world, just as natural gas is piped from Siberia to Western Europe.

These hydrogen fuel cells could soon be used to power cars, trucks, boats, factories and aircraft, helping to establish a clean hydrogen economy. A model for this is Iceland, where hydrogen for fuel cells is being generated by electrolysis using cheap geothermal energy. On this basis, Iceland expects to become emissions-free by 2020.

We also have a clear idea where to build these powerful islands. For the system to function, the gap between the surface and the depths must be at least 20C.

Maps of the oceans show which waters contain the necessary temperature gradients -and China, India and Brazil, the three countries projected to have the greatest economic and population growth this century, and therefore the most pressing energy requirements, all have OTEC potential.

In April in New York, international agencies, national and state governments, environmental groups and industry associations are sponsoring the most substantive global conference on renewable marine power for years.

Here is one fact that should help delegates to focus minds on what is possible: 50,000 energy islands could meet the all world's energy requirement while providing two tons of fresh water per person per day for its six billion inhabitants. That would be a legacy of which Georges Claude could be proud.

• Dominic Michaelis is an architect and engineer. He and his architect son Alex are developing the energy island concept with Trevor Cooper-Chadwick of Southampton University.


Read more!

Imported from China, UK Builds Recyclable Hotel

PlanetArk 9 Jan 08;

LONDON - A British hotel chain is building what is says is the first recyclable hotel constructed from pre-built, container-like crates imported from China, stacked on each other and bolted together.

Budget hotel operator Travelodge said on Tuesday the steel modules could be dismantled if necessary at the end of the 120-room hotel's life and moved elsewhere -- and that the model could ultimately be used to build temporary hotels for sporting events or festivals.

The modules were imported from China with bathrooms already installed, with windows fitted and furnishings and decorations added once the containers have been put together.

But for future hotels, the firm hopes even the furnishing and decoration could be done in China.

"It could facilitate the creation of hotels on a temporary basis at times of peak demand in certain locations -- such as festivals or sporting events," the firm's director of property and development Paul Harvey said.

"A temporary structure to fill such a need would differ to the design of a permanent hotel but it could be built in as little as 12 weeks and removed quickly at the end of the event when the need is gone."

Travelodge says using the Chinese-built modules is 25 percent faster and 10 percent cheaper, making it a core part of their strategy to become the largest hotel operator in London by the 2012 Olympics.

The recyclable hotel, being built in the west London district of Uxbridge, is due to open in June. Rooms will cost just 19 pounds (US$38) a night.

The firm hopes to open a similarly built hotel near London's Heathrow airport by the end of the year.

The firms behind the modular design -- Verbus Systems, a joint-venture between consulting engineers Buro Happold and constructor George & Harding -- say the modular system could also be used for student accommodation and urban housing.

"(It) is the first major advance in construction technology for 100 years, since the introduction of the steel frame," said Verbus chairman Colin Harding. (Writing by Peter Apps, Editing by Dominic Evans)


Read more!

China Launches Surprise Crackdown on Plastic Bags

Guo Shipeng and Emma Graham-Harrison, PlanetArk 9 Jan 08;

BEIJING - China launched a surprise crackdown on plastic bags on Tuesday, banning production of ultra-thin bags and forbidding its supermarkets and shops from handing out free carriers from June 1.

China uses too many of the bags and fails to dispose of them properly, wasting valuable oil and littering the country, China's cabinet, the State Council, said in a notice posted on the central government Web site (www.gov.cn).

"Our country consumes huge amounts of plastic bags every year. While providing convenience to consumers, they have also caused serious pollution, and waste of energy and resources, because of excessive use and inadequate recycling," it said.

Worries about pollution are growing among ordinary citizens, as years of breakneck growth take their toll on the country's air and water, but the new ban may not be universally welcomed.

Late last year the southern boom town of Shenzhen sparked a public controversy by unveiling draft regulations to ban free plastic bags in its shops.

Shopkeepers fretted that customers might be turned away and some people accused the government of making residents shoulder the costs of environmental protection.

Part of the new rules seem similar to the Shenzhen plan, stating that from June shops, supermarkets and sales outlets would be forbidden to offer free plastic bags and all carriers must be clearly marked with their prices.

"We should encourage people to return to carrying cloth bags, using baskets for their vegetables," the notice said.

In addition the manufacture, sale and use of bags under 0.025 mm thick is banned from the same date, with fines and confiscation of goods and profits for firms that flout the rules.

The cabinet also said finance authorities should consider adjusting taxes to discourage the production and sale of plastic bags and encourage the recycling industry.

Rubbish collectors were urged to separate plastic for reprocessing and cut the amount burnt or buried.

The move brings China in line with a growing international trend to cut back use of plastic bags. From Ireland to Uganda and South Africa governments have experimented with heavy taxes, outright bans or eliminating the thinnest bags.

In some countries where the central government has not acted communities ranging from San Francisco to a small British town have taken unilateral action to outlaw the carriers.

Chinese people use up to 3 billion plastic bags a day and the country has to refine 5 million tonnes (37 million barrels) of crude oil every year to make plastics used for packaging, according to a report on the Web site of China Trade News (www.chinatradenews.com.cn).

Shoppers in China will have to pay for plastic bags: govt
Yahoo News 8 Jan 08;

Shoppers in China will have to pay for plastic bags at supermarkets and other retail stores as part of a nationwide crackdown on the environmentally damaging items, the government has announced.

The production, sale and use of plastic shopping bags thinner than 0.025 millimetres (0.001 inches) will also be banned completely, the State Council, or cabinet, said in a statement posted on its website late Tuesday.

"Plastic shopping bags, due to reasons such as excessive use and inefficient recycling, have caused serious energy and resources waste and environment pollution," the statement said.

"The super thin bags (those thinner than 0.025 mm) have especially become a main source of plastic pollution as they are easy to break and thus disposed of carelessly."

The new rules will take effect starting June 1, the cabinet said, although it did not provide details on how much shoppers will have to pay for the bags.

The statement said companies would be urged to produce bags that are more endurable and recyclable, while consumers will be encouraged to use plastic shopping bags more sensibly.

In China, the overuse of plastic bags is a major problem.

In the booming southern city of Shenzhen, at least 1.75 billion plastic bags are used each year, according to previous data released by local authorities and published by the official Xinhua news agency.

Shenzhen's environmental protection department said the bags were posing a huge environmental problem, as they generally did not decompose for 200 years, while some never would at all, Xinhua reported.

Ahead of the national directive, Shenzhen announced in November it was considering placing fees on the use of plastic bags, with fines of up to 50,000 yuan (6,800 dollars) for retailers that gave them away for free.

However whether the national crackdown will be implemented remains in doubt, since local authorities are infamous in China for ignoring directives from the central government that aim to curb pollution among many other issues.


Read more!

Green gold and ethical jewellery

Briton finds ethical jewellery good as gold
David Brough Yahoo News 9 Jan 08;

"Customers don't realize that one wedding ring weighs 10 grammes and causes three tonnes of toxic waste," says Greg Valerio, whose company aims to follow fair trade coffee with ethical gold jewellery.

A silver-haired anti-poverty and human rights campaigner, he is at the forefront of a fast-growing global market for gold and platinum jewellery which seeks to soothe consumers' consciences and protect miners from danger and exploitation.

His jewellery shop in the southern English city of Chichester has formed a partnership with miners in a cooperative in Choco, an underdeveloped region in northeast Colombia, called the Green Gold ("Oro Verde") project.

Together they are working with the Fairtrade Foundation -- which backs farmers and workers from poor countries to develop their communities through fairer terms of trade. They aim to extend Fairtrade's successful labeling to gold.

"Green gold" jewellery is a niche in a fast-growing wider market for ethical goods, ranging from day-to-day foodstuffs like tea, coffee and chocolate to designer fashions and travel.

Analysts say global sales of ethical gold jewellery are probably less than one percent of the total $56 billion gold jewellery market based on figures from London-based consultancy GFMS -- and the Fairtrade label is a year or so away.

Although the ethical product is priced at a premium and gold is at record highs, the market has been ballooning. Among a plethora of online offers are companies including one called greenKarat that argues industrial mining methods damage the land and endanger ecosystems, so recycled gold would be better for society.

British fashion designer Katharine Hamnett includes a link to Valerio's outlet, called Cred, on her Web site. He said ethics were a strong selling point in the jewellery trade: a woman would not want to receive a gift that was tarnished by exploitation.

Nor do some men want to give them. A customer of Valerio's store, Stephen McIlhenny, 27-year-old deputy manager of an outdoor activities centre in Devon, said he ordered a bespoke white gold engagement ring with a round diamond in November for 800 pounds ($1,600).

"I wanted my engagement ring to have put labor and materials to good use rather than wrecking things," he said by telephone. "I wanted my fiancee to know that the gift was very special and did not put people through hardship."

PAY PREMIUM

The "Oro Verde" miners receive an income premium of roughly 10 percent over their peers in Colombia for their work, said Valerio, who has dual British and Canadian nationality and also helped found the independent, global Association for Responsible Mining (ARM).

With donors including the charity Oxfam, the ARM aims to expand the Green Gold initiative to develop a framework for responsible artisanal and small-scale mining and meet growing consumer demand for sustainable jewellery and minerals.

Mine owners in many parts of the world regularly flout safety regulations to meet demand that seems insatiable -- gold has been in a bull market for seven years and on Tuesday prices were probing fresh all-time highs above $880 an ounce.

In South Africa, the world's top platinum producer, more than 200 workers were killed in 2007, prompting a nationwide strike over safety that hit output. The National Union of Mineworkers has threatened more action as it urges the government to prosecute mining companies for the deaths.

The Fairtrade Foundation, which coordinates Fairtrade labeling in 20 countries including Britain, is working with the ARM to explore how to develop the concept of ethical gold.

"If we get a positive board decision to proceed with Fairtrade labeled gold, then depending on the outcome of the pilot studies to date, it would be likely that the first certified gold will be available during 2009," said Fairtrade Foundation policy and producer relations officer Chris Davis.

"It is a partnership that seeks to bring our knowledge of Fairtrade standards and practice together with ARM's knowledge of artisanal small-scale mining," said Davis, who has visited the Choco cooperative, as well as mines in Bolivia and Peru.

"BLOOD DIAMOND" BOOST

Valerio started his store in 2004 and says it is one of the first jewelers in the world to sell ethical gold and platinum jewellery.

"We were helped by 'Blood Diamond'," he said, referring both to the Leonardo DiCaprio movie and to international efforts to stem the flow of conflict diamonds -- rough diamonds used by rebel groups to finance wars, featured in that film.

The Kimberley Process, a joint government, industry and civil society initiative introduced in 2003, sought to help curb decades of devastating conflicts in countries such as Angola, Ivory Coast, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone.

Since Cred started marketing ethical gold and platinum jewellery, its sales have grown fast, with online orders flowing in from around the world, notably the United States, Valerio said.

"Bearing in mind that our certified gold sales at the end of 2004 were zero pounds, we have just posted over 200,000 ($400,000) (in sales) at the end of 2007," he added.

Cred's wedding or engagement rings typically cost about 10 percent more than average prices but are about 15 percent below the top luxury brands such as Tiffany.

A bespoke Cred 18-carat gold wedding ring might cost from 195 to 800 pounds ($390 to $1,600) depending on its size and design -- the cheapest engagement ring one could expect to buy in a standard British store would cost about 80 pounds ($160).

"I think the idea of 'fair trade' jewellery will spread," said Cred customer McIlhenny. "Whenever I talk to my friends about my fiancee's 'fair trade' ring, they all really like the idea."

Andrew Wade, a consumer goods analyst with Seymour Pierce, a London-based investment bank and stockbrokers, is less certain: "It is difficult to know how the end-consumer will respond to higher-priced ethical jewellery," he said.

However keen the demand may be, the health of the global economy will ultimately drive sales: jewelers face the double challenge of soaring gold prices and a downturn in consumer confidence in Europe and the United States.

"But it makes sense to be in a business in a growing area," Wade added.

(Reporting by David Brough; Editing by Sara Ledwith)


Read more!

Grass biofuels 'cut CO2 by 94%'

BBC News 9 Jan 08;

Producing biofuels from a fast-growing grass delivers vast savings of carbon dioxide emissions compared with petrol, a large-scale study has suggested.

A team of US researchers also found that switchgrass-derived ethanol produced 540% more energy than was required to manufacture the fuel.

One acre (0.4 hectares) of the grassland could, on average, deliver 320 barrels of bioethanol, they added.

Their paper appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The five-year study, involving 10 farms ranging in size from three to nine hectares, was described as the largest study of its kind by the paper's authors.

Co-author Ken Vogel of the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Agriculture Research Service, based at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, said that all previous energy analyses had been based on data from research plots and estimated inputs.

Last year, a team of scientists had also examined the energy gains from ethanol produced from switchgrass, but their model suggested that the net gain was in the region of 343%, which was considerably less that the USDA team's findings.

"A lot of their information was based on small plot data and also estimates of what would be needed in the agronomic production of biofuels," Dr Vogel explained.

"We had on-farm trials, so we had all the data from the farmers on all the inputs needed to produce the crops.

"We were able to take this information and put it into this model and able to come up with a very real-world estimate."

The energy inputs required to produce the crops included nitrogen fertiliser, herbicides, diesel and seed production.

However, he added that as there were no large-scale biorefineries in operation, the team did have to estimate how much bioethanol such a plant would be able to produce in order to calculate the net energy gain.

"Right now, the Department of Energy is co-funding the construction of six biorefineries in the US. These plants will be completed around 2010, and will be above the pilot plant scale."

Although the process to produce ethanol from switchgrass was more complex than using food crops such as wheat or corn, the so-called "second generation" biofuel could produce much higher energy yields per tonne because it utilised the whole plant rather than just the seeds.

Carbon cuts

The team also calculated that the production and consumption of switchgrass-derived ethanol cut CO2 emissions by about 94% when compared with an equivalent volume of petrol.

Burning biofuels releases carbon dioxide, but growing the plants absorbs a comparable amount of the gas from the atmosphere.

However, the energy inputs used during the growing and processing of the crops means the fuel is rarely "carbon neutral".

"Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of ethanol from switchgrass, using only the displacement method, showed 88% less GHG emissions than conventional ethanol," the researchers wrote.

"The use of... biomass residue for energy at a... biorefinery is the main reason why switchgrass and human-made prairies have theoretically lower GHG emissions than biofuels from annual (food) crops, where processing is currently derived from fossil fuels."

A number of organisations, including the UN, have expressed concern that biofuels could do more harm than good.

The criticisms of the technology include taking large areas of arable land out of food production, inflating crop prices and limited carbon emission savings.

"In contrast to most European countries, the US has quite a bit of land that is being held outside of (food) production at the moment," Dr Vogel told BBC News.

"We are looking at the use of switchgrass on marginal cropland The intent is to have energy crops being grown on marginal cropland, so it would not be in competition with food crops on our best land.

He also added that there were other factors within the process of producing the biofuel that limited its financial and environmental feasibility.

"Because there is going to be a lot of tonnage of material shipped to the biorefinery, there is going to be some economics involved."

In order to maximise the carbon reductions, he said: "A biorefinery will have a feedstock supply radius of about 25 to 50 miles, so the feedstock of any biorefinery needs to be localised."

As the switchgrass had to be sourced within the local area, Dr Vogel said it was important that the land delivered a high yield of grass in order to meet the refinery's demands.

Annual rainfall was a key factor affecting the delivery of the necessary yields.

Study: Prairie grass can produce ethanol
Josh Funk, Associated Press Yahoo News 9 Jan 08;

New research shows that prairie grasses grown using only moderate amounts of fertilizer on marginal land can produce significant amounts of ethanol.

The five-year study of switch grass done by the University of Nebraska and the USDA's Agricultural Research Service was published this week by the National Academy of Sciences.

Researcher Ken Vogel said he estimates that an acre of switch grass would produce an average of 300 gallons of ethanol based on the study of grass grown on marginal land on farms in Nebraska, South Dakota and North Dakota.

An acre of corn grown in those same states produces about 350 gallons of ethanol on average.

Renewable Fuels Association spokesman Matt Hartwig said this latest study adds to the evidence supporting the development of cellulosic ethanol.

"It underscores that cellulosic ethanol production is not only feasible, it is essential," said Hartwig, whose group represents ethanol producers.

Nebraska Ethanol Board Projects Manager Steve Sorum said the industry is excited about the prospects for cellulosic ethanol because the feedstocks for it, such as switch grass, are cheaper to grow. Plus some of the byproducts created in the process can be burned to generate electricity.

Sorum said the key will be developing an economic way to break down the cell walls of cellulose-based fuel sources.

Both cellulosic and grain-based ethanol will likely play a role in meeting the new federal standard for biofuel use. The energy bill Congress passed last month requires a massive increase in the production of ethanol to 36 billion gallons a year by 2022.

The energy bill will emphasize cellulosic ethanol, made from such feedstock as switch grass and wood chips, after 2015 when about two-thirds of the nation's ethanol is supposed to come from such non-corn sources.

Hartwig said there is general agreement that 15 billion gallons a year is about the most ethanol that can be produced from grain with current technology without hurting grain markets. So he said it's important to develop other sources for the renewable fuel.

Vogel said comparing the amount of ethanol produced by corn with the amount that could be produced by switch grass is a bit unfair because the method of converting switch grass to fuel is still being perfected.

Last year, the Department of Energy announced plans to invest $385 million in six ethanol refineries across the country to jump-start ethanol production from cellulose-based sources, a process that has not yet been proven commercially viable.

But Vogel and the other researchers did develop an estimate of how much energy switch grass would produce based on current conversion rates. Switch grass produces more than five times as much energy than the energy that's consumed by growing the crop and converting it to ethanol, according to the report.

Vogel said this switch grass research is the most extensive to date. Vogel is a U.S. Department of Agriculture geneticist and a University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor.



Read more!

Plastic bottles: The (Possible) Perils of Being Thirsty While Being Green

Alina Tugend, The New York Times 5 Jan 08;

I HAVE the usual New Year’s resolutions — exercise more, lose weight, be a nicer person. I also hope to find out if I am inadvertently poisoning my children.

My fear has to do with reusing what are known as “single use” plastic water bottles, like Poland Spring. I buy them not because I distrust New York tap water, but because they are easy to carry around in the car and to various kids’ sporting events. And if one is lost, as it invariably is, no biggie.

We refill them with tap water and use them a number of times before recycling. I was, I sanctimoniously thought, doing my green part.

But by trying to save the earth, am I hurting my family’s health? I had heard it wasn’t a good idea to refill these single-use bottles because the plastic leaches dangerous chemicals. But is that enough of a risk to make me change my ways? What if I stop using plastic bottles and then drink less water? Is that a good trade-off?

It is the old conundrum about risk versus benefits.

Here is what I found out: most plastics are stamped with a number from 1 to 7 at the bottom — these numbers are used to indicate how to recycle or dispose of the plastic.

The type of plastic bottle that typically holds water, soda and juice is made from polyethylene terephthalate, a petroleum-based material also known as PET that is labeled No. 1.

The trouble with reusing those plastic bottles is that each time they are washed and refilled they become a little more scratched and crinkly, which can lead them to degrade. That can cause a trace metal called antimony to leach out, said Frederick S. vom Saal, a professor of biology at the University of Missouri who has studied plastics for years.

“We have to assume that along with that metal, others are almost certainly leaching out as well, but we don’t know what they are and we don’t know what to look for because manufacturers won’t tell us what else is in the bottles,” Professor vom Saal said.

One inaccuracy that I came across repeatedly is that a chemical called phthalates, which can interfere with male hormones, poses a danger from such water bottles.

Lynn R. Goldman, professor of environmental health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said the truth was that it leached in barely discernible amounts.

Perhaps more worrisome is that because the bottles — with their small openings — are harder to wash out than the wide-mouth hiking and sports bottles, they can house bacteria.

At this point, I do not feel terribly anxious about reusing the bottles several times — that is usually all we can do before we lose them or they crumple beyond recognition.

But perhaps a better alternative — in terms of health and the environment — is to use the hard plastic bottles made with polycarbonate plastic, often known by the brand Nalgene. It has the numeral 7 stamped at the bottom and is the same type of material used to make some baby bottles, the lining of tin cans and other products. I have some of those around the house. They are just too big to fit into our car cup holders so I retired them to the basement.

Time to dig them out?

Not quite. Environmental groups and some scientists have raised concern that such plastic can leach bisphenol A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical.

It is a big enough issue that last year, the National Toxicology Program Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction convened a 12-member expert panel to examine studies related to the chemical.

At the same time, another government-financed group, made up of about 40 scientists with expertise in bisphenol A, reviewed more than 700 relevant studies.

Here is where it gets a little tricky. The first group concluded that most people’s exposure to the chemical was well below the Environmental Protection Agency’s standard.

Nonetheless, the panel expressed “some concern” that the chemical could cause behavioral and neurological problems in developing fetuses and young children. For more information, go to www. niehs.nih.gov.

More studies are being done on certain aspects of the chemical, said Michael D. Shelby, director of the center, and a final brief will be issued this summer.

But Professor vom Saal, the lead author of the scientists’ report, said their findings were far less benign. “There is a very high level of concern about the potential harm caused by bisphenol A in animals,” he said, including potential for diabetes, cancer and obesity. “The prediction by this panel is that we can expect similar harm in people.”

And industry has its own view. Steven Hentges, executive director of the polycarbonate/BPA global group of the American Chemistry Council, dismissed fears about bisphenol A and said that no country had banned or restricted the chemical’s use. “No government body has found reason to be alarmed,” he said. On its Web site, Nalgene reaches the same conclusion.

So forget about those bottles? The reality is that bisphenol A is present in many types of material, from resins used to coat the interior surface of most food and beverage cans to some children’s toys.

There is a danger in focusing exclusively on bottles rather than looking at the need for government regulation of the widespread use of these chemicals, Professor Goldman said.

But choosing what water container you use can give you a slight sense of control. And Professor vom Saal noted that the range of exposure among people varied widely. So exchanging that polycarbonate water bottle for one made of glass or stainless steel may be a good idea.

Forget glass for obvious reasons (“Mom, I just sliced my finger”). A search of available stainless steel bottles showed they run around $16 and up — a safer but pricey alternative given that no matter how hard we try, we are bound to leave them scattered on various fields.

“If I was to use plastic, I would stay with No. 2 and No. 5,” Professor vom Saal said. No. 2 is high-density polyethylene; No. 5 is polypropylene. Both are used in margarine tubs and yogurt containers for example.

But, he warned, do not heat anything in any type of plastic in the microwave.

If you do use these hard No. 7 plastic bottles, the Green Guide, published by the National Geographic Society, advises you to avoid washing them in a dishwasher or with harsh detergent to limit wear and tear.

I have no doubt that some readers think it is ridiculous to worry about such risks, while others will immediately toss out their plastic bottles. I am still on the fence.

So, in a frenzy of indecision, I decided to look elsewhere in an attempt to be environmentally good. What about those plastic bags we use for sandwiches and snacks — is there a way to cut down on them?

One friend suggested wax paper, another foil.

“The big trade-off is between manufacturing and disposability,” said Seth Bauer, editorial director for the Green Guide and thegreenguide.com. “Plastic is manufactured incredibly efficiently and uses a lot less energy, while wax paper has a fairly intensive manufacturing process.”

Mining aluminum is also bad for the environment, he noted, and uses a great deal of energy.

Plastic bags can be rinsed out, if they do not hold meat, and reused, but wax paper is better than plastic when it comes to disposal.

There is also a Web site, www.reusablebags.com, which offers a product called “Wrap-N-Mat” with a Velcro closure that you can wash and use repeatedly at $6.95 a pop.

I might try good old-fashioned Tupperware. I started searching on the Web for cute ones shaped like sandwiches and then realized I had plenty of containers in my cupboard that would do the job just fine.

Stop buying and use what we have in the house? Now that would be an innovative resolution.


Read more!

The village falling into the sea

The Independent 7 Jan 08;

The problem of erosion intensified in the early 1990s when a developer was given permission by the local council to build sea defences along the coast. The Arnolds refused to sell their land to the developer, meaning that their property was the only one not protected.

Skipsea is disappearing fast. It sits on the fastest-eroding coastline in Europe and every year the sea swallows another chunk of land. Mark Hughes visits the people living on the edge

The sign as you enter Skipsea is an immediate indication that something is wrong. "Danger," it reads. "Enter at your own risk." Just ahead, there is a huge hole in the middle of the road, blocking your path.

The village of Skipsea sits, precariously, on Yorkshire's East Riding coastline – the fastest eroding coastline in Europe.

As 2008 begins, many of the villagers have a common new year's resolution: to leave their doomed village before their homes are washed into the sea. Official figures estimate that this coastline loses an average of 18 inches a year. The council estimates that 13 homes in the village will disappear in the next five years, with a further 78 likely to be lost by 2058.

But, worryingly, the residents of Skipsea, which has a population of just 600, say these estimates are far too optimistic.

With 2007 being the worst year in recent memory, 2008 is generally regarded as make or break for those closest to the ever-receding cliff-face.

For Josephine and Colin Arnold this will almost certainly be the year they are forced to leave their home of 19 years.

The couple moved to their 11-room farmhouse in May 1988 to set up a business in the village, which is a popular tourist destination.

They bought the house with an acre of land and opened a restaurant, a campsite, a caravan park and a holiday cottage.

But in just 19 years the land behind their home, which once stretched back 100 feet, has shrunk to six feet.

The land where the campsite, the caravans and cottage once stood is gone, washed away by the sea. Last year's frequent storms forced them to start demolishing their home, reducing the 11-room farmhouse, where they housed the restaurant, to to just six rooms.

A 20-foot drop has replaced the space where their kitchen, dining room, living room and two bedrooms used to be. And a wall of tyres sits at the end of the driveway to stop cars driving off the edge of the cliff. They have lost their home and their business. They now live in a renovated caravan and make their living selling doughnuts from the back of a van.

"It's been terrible," said Mrs Arnold. "We never expected the coast to disappear so quickly. It's now got to the point that another big tide will wash away the rest of the house and possibly the caravan too.

"When we moved here we hoped that we could make enough money to be able to move away but we didn't make the money quickly enough and we became stuck here. There comes a time when you just have to accept that it is too dangerous to live here any more. It's at the stage where I dread any bad weather, I panic when I see rain now because it could mean a storm and that's bad news."

The couple say that the problem of erosion intensified in the early 1990s when a developer was given permission by the local council to build sea defences along the coast.

The Arnolds refused to sell their land to the developer, meaning that their property was the only one not protected.

Mrs Arnold, 56, added: "In our opinion the defences were never going to work and that's why we didn't sell the land. And we were right because they have since fallen down. But when they were built it was a disaster for us.

"The experts say that about one foot falls off the cliffs every year, but when those defences went up we sat and watched about 18 feet wash away in 20 minutes. Because we were the only ones without a sea defence all the water was channelled towards our house."

The couple – who share their home with their daughter Katie, 30, and Mrs Arnold's brother Alan Lead and his wife Cindy – are now waiting to hear from the council what type of compensation they will be entitled to.

A meeting to discuss the matter is scheduled for March and Mr Arnold, 62, hopes that they will finally be able to start planning for the future.

He said: "At first we didn't like to think about moving away because this has been our home for a long time. But we have accepted that it's inevitable and we are ready to move, but we need somewhere to go.

It's not like a normal house sale where we can sell our house and move on; who is going to buy a house that will be gone in a few years? We need the council to give us compensation or land as soon as possible so we can move away from here."

A short walk from the Arnolds' home, on Southfield Lane, takes you to Green Lane. You can't take a car between the houses because there is a huge hole in the middle of the road – another consequence of coastal erosion.

Walking down mud track towards Green Lane gives you the feeling that the houses there have already been condemned. The sign as you enter the street reads: "Danger coastal erosion. Enter at your own risk."

Residents of Green Lane have to use the back doors of their houses, as access at the front is hampered by the road closure.

The row of houses on the street hasn't always been right on the edge of the cliff face. Before 1980 another row sat in front of them. Those houses have since been washed away.

Valerie Robinson, 65, knows it won't be long before she, like those in the 1980s, is forced to leave her home.

"Our houses are about 100 feet away from the edge but it's getting closer every year. I've lived here for the past 14 years and more of the coast has washed away in the past two years than ever before. I can only see it getting worse," she said.

"I remember when I used to sit out in the garden and tourists would be envious of our houses. They would tell me that if they won the pools they'd move here. No one is saying that any more. No one wants to live here now. When I bought the place I was told by the estate agent that it would be here for 45 years. That was in 1993 and I don't give it another five years before these houses are gone.

"We've accepted that we will have to leave soon. We are just hoping we get some good news in March with regards to the compensation and then we can think about leaving."

Mrs Robinson's daughter Wendy lives two doors down. She says she is one of the lucky ones because she rents her property and isn't faced with losing her only asset – the prospect her mother faces.

Wendy, 36, said: "It's become a dangerous place to live. I have a 12-year-old daughter and I'm forever warning her not to play out on the front. It's a frightening thought what could happen. Only last week an old man was blown over the edge. I only rent, so I'm lucky in that sense, but if the council offered me another house tomorrow I would take it. It used to be lovely living here, 'Millionaires' Row' they used to call it. It's disgusting now and we just want to get out.

"We feel like we have been forgotten about. We are right on the coast, our houses about to fall into the sea, and it seems like no one cares."

Michael Kitchen, a neighbour, echoes her sentiments. Mr Kitchen, 65, has been visiting the village for 50 years and has lived there for the past 12.

He said: "We first started becoming really concerned about coastal erosion in November 2006 and since then I've written letters to everyone: the council, Defra, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, the list goes on.

"It's the same story though. They say they are discussing it, but no one seems interested in protecting this coastline. It's been more than 20 years since the last row of houses went into the sea and since then we have all been waiting for ours to be next.

"I've been on a deferred list for a council house for the past six years. Every year they ask me if I would like them to find me a new house and every year I say no. This year I'm going to say yes.

"The way this coastline is eroding, the next lot of houses will go a lot quicker than we all first thought. We've to make other plans.

"When the last lot of houses went in the 1980s it was just a handful of people that lost their homes. This time we are talking about a small community that is going to disappear.

"This erosion won't stop at our house. It will eat into the village and before you know it Skipsea will be gone."


Read more!