Best of our wild blogs: 17 Mar 09


First Reef Survey For Year 2009
on the colourful clouds blog

Georgia Aquarium response on Singapore petition against captive whale sharks on the wild shores of singapore blog and official poster for the Say NO to whale sharks in captivity campaign.

Why slaughter and eat these beautiful eels?
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Aquatic copulation of the Purple Heron
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

She's a squeeze
on the annotated budak blog

This rare Sunbird has claimed an SSDC training bike of its own
on the Lazy Lizard's Tales blog

Ursa Freedom Project: from Crush Cages to Freedom
on the Bornean Sun Bear Conservation blog

New Eco-China Website Launched
on AsiaIsGreen


Read more!

Atlanta whale shark deaths cited in Singapore protest

Activists say giant fish shouldn’t be displayed at new Singapore oceanarium
Jim Tharpe, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 16 Mar 09;

Animal welfare groups half a world away are using the 2007 deaths of two whale sharks at the Georgia Aquarium in an effort to stop a Singapore resort from displaying the huge fish.

The groups, which include the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, have launched a Web site (www.whalesharkpetition.com) and petition drive that highlights the Georgia Aquarium whale sharks deaths to argue that the big fish should not be kept in captivity at a new marine park in Singapore.

Ralph and Norton — two adolescent whale sharks brought to Atlanta from Taiwan — died two years ago after their tank was treated with a chemical used to rid fish of parasites. The Georgia Aquarium still has four whale sharks, and is the only fish tank outside of Asia to display the polka-dotted giants, the largest fish species and the largest sharks in the world.

Resorts World at Sentosa is building two casinos in Singapore, which will feature what the resort calls the “world’s biggest oceanarium” when it opens next year. The resort says the oceanarium will house 700,000 fish in 20 million gallons of water.

“No man-made environment, no matter now large, could accommodate the needs of a whale shark,” the environmental groups said in a statement.

Whale sharks are ocean-going fish that can dive to depths of several thousand feet in the wild. They have been kept successfully for more than a decade at some Asian aquariums. However, critics argue the majority of whale sharks held in captivity die within a few years of their capture.

The Georgia Aquarium was designed specifically to house the giant fish, which can grow to 40-plus feet and weigh tons.

The aquarium has not taken a position on the Singapore resort’s plan to display whale sharks, but defends its ability to do so.

“Nine million people have seen whale sharks who would not have seen them otherwise,” said aquarium spokeswoman Meghann Gibbons. “We believe we’re making a difference through education and research inside the building and the research we fund in the field.”

The aquarium funds whale shark research off the Yucatan Peninsula and in Taiwan.

Related articles


Read more!

Singapore Government's plans for Earth Hour

Straits Times Forum 17 Mar 09;

I REFER to Mr Grant W. Pereira's letter last Saturday, "Earth Hour: Any public events planned here?".

The objective of Earth Hour, which seeks to raise international awareness on the need to take action on climate change, is a laudable one.

The Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and the National Environment Agency (NEA) have been promoting energy efficiency, and the Government has taken the lead to minimise energy consumption in many of its office premises. The Environment Building, for instance, has been one of the first government buildings to receive the Energy Smart Label.

As was done last year, the ministry and NEA will use this occasion to encourage staff to practise energy conservation habits in the office, such as switching off lights and idling equipment when they leave the office every day.

We also encourage organisations that have participated in Earth Hour to continue with their energy-saving efforts throughout the year.

Derek Ho
Director, 3P Network Division
Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources

More links See the Earth Hour Singapore blog for a wide range of events organised by NGOs for Earth Hour.


Read more!

$80k green fund for Marsiling Secondary School

Straits Times 17 Mar 09;

FOR three years, Marsiling Secondary School students have been brainstorming ways to save the environment.

As part of their Environment Education module, a non-examinable subject, lower secondary students have proposed air-purifying models, suggestions for greener buildings and water-recycling methods.

While these projects often showcase the students' in-depth thinking skills and creativity, the school has never formally recognised their efforts.

This will change with a $80,000 environment education fund presented by technology multinational company Hitachi to the school, in line with the firm's Eco Conference, held for the first time here yesterday.

The fund will go towards three key areas, one of which is rewarding students who have excelled in environment-related projects. Awards will be in the form of book vouchers and educational material.

The fund, which will be used over three years, will also go towards training teachers to keep up to date on environmental issues, and also towards creating learning packages and teaching resources in areas such as waste management and water technology.

The school has been a Centre of Excellence for Environmental Education in North 5 school cluster since 2007.

In the Environment Education module, students spend two hours a week thinking of innovative ways to solve air and water pollution problems that Singapore faces.

At the end of 15 weeks, the students form groups and propose projects to combat these environmental problems.

The guest of honour at the launch of the fund was Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources.

'The world is heading for an 'ecological credit crunch' far worse than the current financial crisis because people are over-using natural resources,' he said, quoting a recent study by the World Wildlife Fund.

In the light of Hitachi's efforts to become greener, Dr Yaacob urged other companies to continue working towards being environmentally friendly, even during the current harsh economic climate.

JALELAH ABU BAKER

$80k fund for green efforts
Marsiling Secondary School to expand programmes
Ong Dai Lin, Today Online 17 Mar 09;

IT HAS gotten a bit greener at Marsiling Secondary School, thanks to an $80,000 financial boost that will help enhance its environment education.

The money, donated by electronics company Hitachi, will be used over three years to build up the teaching capacity of the school’s teachers, provide incentives such as book vouchers to reward students who do well in projects, and to expand learning programmes.

The school already offers programmes with topics like renewable energy. Now, it is looking at a new programme to teach students about water technology and to work with institutes of higher education, said Ms Beatrice Chong, its vice-principal.

Since 2005, lower secondary students have been attending a compulsory Environment Education Module — a two-hour weekly session for them to learn about issues like water recycling. Upper secondary students can opt to take advanced elective modules on the environment that are held jointly with polytechnics.

The donation came from the Hitachi Environment Education Fund, launched yesterday at the inaugural Hitachi Eco Conference 2009. It will “complement Marsiling’s existing environment education programme”, said Ms Chong.

The school, which was designated as a Centre of Excellence in Environment Education in 2007, is partnering seven primary schools in Woodlands to offer its learning programmes to their pupils. It will now use the extra funds to partner more primary schools.

Mr Takashi Hatchoji, Hitachi’s chief environmental strategy officer, said: “By nurturing eco awareness among the youth, we ensure that future generations will keep our Earth safe.”

Sustainable development, said Minister for the Environment and Water Resources,Dr Yaacob Ibrahim at the conference, is not just an environmental and economic imperative” for Singapore but also a “huge economic opportunity”.

Singapore can become “one of the world’s most competitive producers of sustainable technologies and solutions”, he said.


Read more!

Indonesia Must Boost Palm Yields To Save Forests

Aloysius Bhui and Ed Davies, PlanetArk 17 Mar 09;

JAKARTA - Indonesia needs to squeeze far higher yields from existing palm oil plantations rather than open up more land in a country with some of the world's swiftest deforestation, a Greenpeace official said on Monday.

Indonesia, the world's top palm oil producer, yields only about 2 tonnes per hectare from its plantations, or just a third of the 6 to 7 tonnes in countries such as Malaysia with better estate management practices, said Annette Cotter, campaign manager for the forests campaign in Greenpeace Southeast Asia.

"What's interesting about palm oil in Indonesia is that the current plantations actually yield a very, very poor return," Cotter said, speaking as part of the Reuters Food and Agriculture Summit.

Indonesia has 7.1 million hectares, or 17.5 million acres of palm oil estates, with smallholders accounting for about 35 percent, but is looking to expand further.

In a controversial move, Indonesia's agriculture ministry said last month it would allow 8 percent of its 25 million hectares of peatlands, which harbour huge carbon stocks, to be used for palm oil, ending a freeze on permits dating from December 2007.[ID:nJAK438798]

"You don't need to expand into further forest and further peatland to get increased economic benefits from palm oil," said Cotter, calling the move to end the freeze on peatlands "a total disaster".

Up to 84 percent of Indonesia's carbon emissions come from deforestation, forest fires and peatland degradation, a report sponsored by the World Bank and Britain's Department for International Development says.

"So what you've got is a situation of relatively poor management of existing plantations and you've got companies looking for further expansion to increase production but not looking at increasing productivity in existing estates," said Cotter, who has spent 12 years at Greenpeace with time in Brazil monitoring Amazon forests.

By boosting existing estates' productivity, Indonesia would "go a very long way to increasing production and increasing therefore Indonesia's exports," she added.

GREEN PALM OIL?

Under fire from green groups and consumers, the palm oil industry set up a Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in 2004, to develop an ethical certification system, with commitment to save rainforests and wildlife.

One of Indonesia's top palm companies, PT Musim Mas, was its first to be certified by RSPO in January.

Cotter called RSPO a "toothless tiger" that has failed to seriously curb deforestation.

"They (RSPO) need to prove that they are actually committed to their principles before we can say they are actually doing a good job," she added.

The global financial crisis was delaying planned palm oil expansion and showing up its flaws, she added.

"What palm oil is being sold as is the green gold, but it's another classic boom and bust industry," said Cotter, noting that a collapse in palm oil prices late last year led to job losses and fruit rotting on trees.

BIOFUEL THREAT

The growing trend of palm oil use in biofuel also threatened conservation and food security, Cotter said.

Indonesia and Malaysia, the world's top two palm oil producers, have made the use of palm-based biodiesel mandatory from this year.

Cotter said biofuel could be looked at for development only after food security issues had been addressed, and principles of sustainable agriculture enforced.

"But that's not the case we are in at the moment."

Sharp drops in global food prices, including palm oil, have temporarily eased concerns over food security.

"If you look where the trends are going internationally with palm oil it's focusing more and more on biofuels and less and less on food," she said.

"And so you're actually going to see in the future questions around food security."

(Editing by Clarence Fernandez)


Read more!

'Summer of hard knocks' hits Great Barrier Reef

Louis Andrews, Canberra Times 17 Mar 09;

The Great Barrier Reef is reeling from shocking weather damage that might take two decades to heal.

Sunburn in a hot December, flooding rains in January and February and a tropical cyclone combined in what the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority is calling a "summer of hard knocks".

The authority's chairman, Russell Reichelt, said the "triple whammy" raised serious concerns given the ramifications of climate change.

"The forecasts are [predicting] an increased frequency of extreme events," he said.

Flood damage, cyclones and sun bleaching were nothing new, but all three at once was unusual or unrecorded, Dr Reichelt said.

"The worry ... isn't the sudden demise of the Great Barrier Reef, it'll be a steady degradation of the reef's capacity to bounce back."

The reef avoided the full impact of the bleaching December sun because of the onslaught of the wettest year in 100 years.

"It's slowed down the warming but then it went on to cause fresh water damage," Dr Reichelt said.

The resulting freshwater flood plumes were stressful to corals and were followed by yet another destructive weather event Cyclone Hamish.

Dr Reichelt said Hamish's route, straight down the outer edge of the Great Barrier Reef, was remarkable.

"The people I'm speaking to haven't experienced that in 30 years on the reef.

"What we want to do now is shore up its ability to bounce back," he said.

The first step will be clearing up the run-off water from the floods.

"There is much work still to be done, and with extreme weather events becoming more frequent, now more than ever we need to remain vigilant."


Read more!

Fate of polar bears seen to depend on emissions cuts

John Acher Yahoo News 16 Mar 09;

OSLO (Reuters) – Global warming is threatening polar bears as it melts their icy Arctic habitat, Norway's environment minister said on Monday.

"If the ice is disintegrating in the Arctic, it will have enormous impact on polar bears," Environment and Development Minister Erik Solheim told reporters on the eve of a meeting to discuss the future of the huge white carnivore.

The meeting is the first since 1981 to bring together states which are home to polar bears -- Norway, Russia, Canada, the United States and Danish-administered Greenland.

"Clearly the main point in a rescue plan for the polar bear is to reduce global warming," Solheim said.

The world's polar bear population is estimated at 20,000-25,000 animals, with 2,200-4,000 belonging to the Barents Sea population of Norway and northwestern Russia.

Polar bears spend most of their lives on or near sea ice. Though they are excellent swimmers, they are no match in the water for seals, their main prey, so they must hunt on ice floes.

Solheim said it was very helpful that the United States under former President George W. Bush put the polar bear on the list of endangered species.

"We should build on that to see what we can do to protect the polar bears," he said.

The range states agreed in 1973 to protect polar bears and their habitat, but they have not met for 28 years.

SOOT A POLAR PROBLEM

James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and an expert on global warming, said pollutants and gases such as soot, ozone and methane, can be controlled more easily in the Arctic than carbon dioxide (CO2).

CO2 is the main greenhouse gas blamed for global warming.

Industrial soot, for instance, blackens the snow and makes it soak up more heat, accelerating the melt.

"Their warming effect in the Arctic is very large," Hansen told a news conference. "Pollution in the Arctic contributes to the melting of the ice. Those climate-forcing mechanisms can be addressed more quickly than carbon dioxide."

Arctic sea ice shrank in 2007 to its smallest since satellite measurements began 30 years ago, leading to worries that it could vanish in summers.

"I think it's still possible to save sea ice in the Arctic but it requires strong, prompt actions," Hansen said.

About 700 polar bears are shot yearly in Canada, Alaska and on Greenland. Since 1973, hunting has been banned in the Svalbard archipelago off northernmost Norway.

In the Russian part of the Arctic, hunting is illegal, but an unknown number of bears is shot every year, according to the Norwegian Polar Institute.

(Reporting by John Acher and Alister Doyle; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

Hunters under fire in battle to save polar bear from extinction
Summit to discuss limits on hunting as starvation hits numbers of Arctic predators
Michael McCarthy, The Independent 16 Mar 09;

A limit on the hunting of polar bears by sportsmen and native Arctic people will top the agenda at an international summit in Norway tomorrow, seen as vital to the survival of the predator. Although few people outside the Arctic realise it, there is still a major legal hunt for the animals in four out of the five states that host the bears: Canada, Greenland, Alaska in the US, and Russia. In Norway, stalking is banned.

This hunt by Inuit native peoples and in Canada also by sportsmen – referred to as a "harvest" – claims as many as 700 polar bears killed every year, 3 per cent of the entire population. Adding the threat from climate change, which is eradicating the bear's natural habitat, the hunts are seen as no longer "sustainable". Studies from the US Geological Survey and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature suggest that the total population of 22,000 polar bears will fall by up to two-thirds over the next 50 years, leading the creature to the precipice of extinction.

In the age of global warming, Ursus maritimus is coming to replace the giant panda as the world's principal icon of threatened wildlife. Rising temperatures are rapidly melting the Arctic sea-ice the bears use in summer to hunt seals, meaning many cannot build large fat reserves to take them through the winter, and so starve.

The summit is in Tromsø, the Norwegian city 200 miles north of the Arctic Circle. The five countries were party to the 1973 Polar Bear Agreement, signed by all the range states to regulate hunting, which at the time was thought to be getting out of control.

The agreement in general is thought to have worked well, but on the table tomorrow will be a draft Species Action Plan for the polar bear drawn up by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), with one of its principal points being the issue of "unsustainable harvest", in other words, overhunting in the face of global warming.

The aim, said Geoff York, polar bear conservation co-ordinator for WWF's Arctic Programme, is to get the states which allow hunting to incorporate the science of climate change into their "harvest management plans". He added: "Climate change impacts are not formally taken into account with any of the polar bear populations which are harvested. We're asking the parties who manage polar bears to incorporate climate change science into their management regimes."

The implication is of course that hunting quotas will have to be reduced, a difficult issue with the Inuit who see it as part of their culture. WWF says it is not opposed to hunting in principle, as long as it is sustainable. But, said Mr York, "That is quickly changing. The situation facing polar bears is dire, because of habitat loss due to climate change. If we don't do something meaningful soon, it will be very difficult for them to survive in the long run."

The question of future hunting is sensitive, not least because there is evidence that some polar bear populations are already being exploited beyond what their numbers could support, even in the absence of the climate threat.

The Baffin Bay population, found between eastern Canada and Greenland, is thought to be one such, with a near 30 per cent decline in recent years from 2,100 to 1,500; the Chukotka population in eastern Siberia is thought to be another, where there may be illegal hunting.

The financial return from hunting is an important income for some indigenous people. Polar bears taken are used as food in some communities, and skins and skulls are either sold commercially, converted to handicrafts, or used privately.

The draft action plan also addresses industrialisation of the Arctic, toxic substances, and how to deal with the increasing number of human-polar bear interactions as bears come ashore in larger numbers as the sea-ice disappears.

Mr York said that he understood the view that hunting should be banned completely but the WWF preferred a more nuanced approach, working with local people. "If you just take away people's livelihoods, you can do short-term harm to your long-term conservation goals," he said.

The Bear Hunt: Only the liver is wasted once the Inuits strike
Cahal Milmo, The Independent 16 Mar 09;

Inuit hunters call it the nanniaq, the quest to track, chase and kill the animal they consider to be king of the beasts that stalk the ice floes and plains of the Arctic.

For centuries, indigenous tribesmen have used dogs and wooden sleds to pursue polar bears. The dog teams harass and surround their prey before the men move in for the kill, armed with just a wooden spear. If the huntsman failed to place his blow correctly, he risked the scything blow of a polar bear's claws and its preferred method of slaying a meal, crushing the skull between its jaws.

Nowadays, the Inuit can keep their distance from nanuq, as the bear is known in their language, by using a hunting rifle and stalking their quarry on snowmobiles. But the annual bear-hunt remains a practice steeped in technique and tradition.

Working in temperatures as low as minus 35C, the pursuit can last days as the hunters search out tracks and droppings in the snow. When they spot a bear, they issue the "caw" of a raven, a bird that frequently follows the huge carnivores to scavenge on discarded carcasses. The noise would be familiar to the animal and can even cause it to slow down to investigate.

Working in teams, the hunters trap the bear on the ice between open water and the shore before felling it with a shot to the heart. It is then butchered on the spot. Almost everything is used: the thick fur is made into trousers or footwear and the meat is prized for stews. Sinews are used for sewing clothes while the fat goes into food or oil lamps and the large canine teeth are still prized as talismans. The only part of the beast that is discarded is the liver, which contains a poisonous concentration of vitamin A and is either thrown into the sea or buried to stop the dogs from eating it.

Legends and superstitions about nanuq abound in Inuit society. The bears are thought to have the power to change shape, converting themselves into other animals or ice to evade hunters. One taboo is that a successful huntsman must remove his outer clothes before entering his home, mimicking the belief that a polar bear removes it fur once safely inside its den and assumes human form.

Polar Bears At Risk, Climate Deal Needed: Norway
John Acher, PlanetArk 18 Mar 09;

OSLO - An international plan is needed to rescue polar bears and their icy Arctic habitat but its success will hinge on a U.N. deal to fight global warming due to be agreed in December, Norway said on Tuesday.

"Climate change has overtaken hunting as the most significant threat to the polar bear," Norway's Environment and Development Minister Erik Solheim told a meeting of the five states rimming the Arctic where the white bears live.

"We must work to protect the ecosystem the bear is part of," Solheim said. "Global warming must be stopped if we are to succeed."

Solheim urged the three-day meeting -- the first time the range states have met since 1981 -- to agree on a joint action plan for saving the polar bear, including cooperation on research and management of the species.

The meeting in the Norwegian town of Tromsoe within the Arctic Circle is the first since 1981 to bring together the states that are home to polar bears -- Norway, Russia, Canada, the United States and Danish-administered Greenland.

The five agreed in 1973 to protect the bear and its habitat at a time when human hunters were its only known enemy. But the melting of the polar ice is now the biggest threat to the world's 20,000-25,000 polar bears, experts say.

Though they are excellent swimmers, the great white carnivores are not fast enough to catch seals, their main prey, in open water. Their survival depends on catching seals on ice, which is shrinking fast.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) reclassified the polar bear as a vulnerable species on its Red List of Endangered Species in 2005.

Arctic sea ice shrank in 2007 to its smallest since satellite measurements began 30 years ago, raising the prospect that it could vanish in summers.

Though climate change is the main risk to the bear, Solheim said the species' habitat is also threatened with destruction through pollution, human disturbance and hunting.

He said rapid reduction of sea ice can also trigger other mechanisms, such as a release of methane from the Arctic tundra or accelerate the melting of glaciers on Greenland.

"This could have dramatic effects for people's living conditions all over the world," he said. "We must send a clear message to the climate meeting in Copenhagen that it must hurry to stop and reverse the rising of temperatures and melting of ice in the Arctic," Solheim said.

More than 190 governments will meet in Copenhagen in December to agree a new global accord to replace the Kyoto pact.

Polar bear states retreat behind closed doors to discuss climate measures
WWF 17 Mar 09;

Tromso, Norway - Five countries meeting for the first time in 25 years to discuss polar bear conservation today retreated behind closed doors to discuss climate change and national measures being taken to combat it.

Climate change and the receding Arctic sea ice are regarded as the greatest threat to the Arctic emblem.

Unexpectedly excluded from the meeting were NGOs, an Arctic indigenous organization and other observers.

“We do not know what these countries have to say about protecting polar bears that cannot be shared with the world,” says Geoff York, polar bear coordinator for WWF.

The decision to exclude observers from the Meeting of the Parties on the Agreement on the Conservation on Polar Bears, was taken yesterday at another closed door meeting between heads of the national delegations. The countries involved in the meeting are Norway, Russia, Canada, the United States and Denmark (Greenland).

However, it seems not all countries were supportive of the exclusion of observers.

“The Norwegian Environment Minister made it clear today that the host Norwegian government wanted WWF and other interested parties to take part in this meeting,” said York. “WWF applauds the Norwegian Minister for calling on the meeting to deliver strong message on climate change to the UN climate conference in Copenhagen this December.

“It is unfortunate that some other countries are not so open and transparent.

“It may be that certain governments do not want to hear what we have to say about the necessity of tackling climate change as the core threat to polar bears, and their obligations under the polar bear agreement to take action to protect polar bear habitat.”

WWF, officially invited to the meeting, intends to “continue to monitor the meeting as much as we are able”, York said.

It also intends to present to delegates draft plans on managing polar bears and conservation financing if given the opportunity after the meeting closes.

Curb climate change to save polar bear: Norway
Pierre-Henry Deshayes Yahoo News 17 Mar 09;

TROMSOE, Norway (AFP) – Countries around the Arctic must commit to curbing climate change to ensure the survival of the polar bear, Norway's environment minister said Tuesday as an international meeting opened on the species' fate.

"The principal threat to polar bears now is coming from climate change," Erik Solheim told representatives of the five countries that ring the Arctic -- Canada, Denmark (with Greenland), Norway, Russia and the United States.

"To succeed in conserving the important ecosystems (that the polar bear depends on) we must stop global warming," he said at the gathering in the northern Norwegian town of Tromsoe.

The three-day meeting will discuss how to address threats to the white bear that have emerged since the five countries first signed a conservation agreement in 1973, when hunters were the species' only known enemy.

Nearly four decades later, global warming is considered by far the biggest danger to the polar bear, as it melts the Arctic sea ice that makes up the animal's primary hunting ground for its main prey, seals.

Some estimates show the ice could disappear completely during the summer months by 2020 or even earlier.

With the mercury rising ever higher, as many as two thirds of the 20-25,000 polar bears that roam the Arctic could disappear by the middle of this century, according to a recent estimate from the US Geological Survey.

After that, the remainder of the animals would only be found in the far north of Canada and Greenland, experts predict.

The Tromsoe gathering comes just nine months before talks on a new global pact on climate change to replace the Kyoto accord are to be held in Copenhagen. The outcome of that is largely expected to determine the fate of the polar bear.

"I hope that we here will reach a consensus that will send a strong message to the climate negotiators," Solheim told AFP on the sidelines of the conference.

"This meeting is not about debating a 25 or 30 percent reduction of greenhouse gases, but rather it's about issuing a loud warning before the Copenhagen meeting: the situation in the Arctic, as symbolised by the polar bear, is very serious," he added.

Host country Norway hopes the meeting will not only lead to a recognition of the link between saving the climate and saving the polar bear, but also an agreement on a joint action plan and increased efforts to reduce other dangers to the species.

The polar bear is also threatened by chemical pollutants from industries and increased human activity in the once-pristine Arctic.

They include oil and gas prospecting, mining, tourism, military exercises and shipping, all of which are expected to boom as the Arctic ice melts.

Environmental activists on Tuesday vehemently criticised a decision to exclude observers from parts of the Tromsoe meeting at the request of certain participants.

They interpreted this as a lack of real willingness to address delicate issues.

"Before, it was dangerous to run into a polar bear if you weren't carrying a weapon," said Rasmus Hansson, the head of the Norwegian branch of environmental group WWF.

"Today, the topic of polar bears seems as dangerous in the international political arena, where the slightest mention of it means you have to discuss subjects that hurt, like climate change," he told AFP.

All fingers were being pointed at Canada and Greenland, he added.

"Canadian authorities want to pretend that it's possible to discuss the polar bear without taking climate change into account, which is a position that is difficult to defend," Hansson said.

"As for Greenland, it interprets the presence of observers as an unacceptable interference in its management of the polar bear hunt, which is a tradition there," he said.

The heads of the Canadian and Greenlandic delegations told AFP they wanted the Tromsoe meeting to be kept at the "technical" level focusing on a simple exchange of information.

Norway had meanwhile indicated that it hoped the meeting would lead to concrete decisions.


Read more!

The Fall and Rise of the Right Whale

Cornelia Dean, New York Times 16 Mar 09;

ST. SIMONS ISLAND, Ga. — The biologists had been in the plane for hours, flying back and forth over the calm ocean. They had seen dolphins, leatherback turtles, a flock of water birds called gannets and even a basking shark — but not what they were looking for.

Then Millie Brower, who was peering with intense concentration through a bubblelike window fitted into the plane’s fuselage, announced “nine o’clock, about a mile off.” The plane made a stomach-churning lurch as the pilots banked left and began to circle. And there, below, were a right whale mother and her new calf, barely breaking the surface, lolling in the swells.

The researchers, from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Georgia Wildlife Trust, are part of an intense effort to monitor North Atlantic right whales, one of the most endangered, and closely watched, species on earth. As a database check eventually disclosed, the whale was Diablo, who was born in these waters eight years ago. Her calf — at a guess 2 weeks old and a bouncing 12 feet and 2 tons — was the 38th born this year, a record that would be surpassed just weeks later, with a report from NOAA on the birth of a 39th calf. The previous record was 31, set in 2001.

“It’s a bumper year for calves,” Richard Merrick, an oceanographer for NOAA’s fisheries service, said in an interview. “That’s a good sign.”

Actually, it’s one of so many good signs that researchers are beginning to hope that for the first time in centuries things are looking up for the right whale. They say the species offers proof that simple conservation steps can have a big impact, even for species driven to the edge of oblivion.

North Atlantic right whales, which can grow up to 55 feet long and weigh up to 70 tons, were the “right” whales for 18th- and 19th-century whalers because they are rich in oil and baleen, move slowly, keep close to shore and float when they die.

They were long ago hunted to extinction in European waters, and by 1900 perhaps only 100 or so remained in their North American range, from feeding grounds off Maritime Canada and New England to winter calving grounds off the Southeastern coast.

Since then, the species’ numbers have crept up, but very slowly. NOAA estimates that there are about 325, though scientists in and out of the agency suspect there may be more, perhaps as many as 400. It has been illegal to hunt the right whale since 1935, when the League of Nations put them under protection. Even so, researchers despaired of ever seeing a healthy right whale population here as long as ship strikes still maimed and killed them and fishing gear strangled them.

But “over the last four or five months there’s been a tremendous amount of good news,” said Tony LaCasse, a spokesman for the New England Aquarium, a center of right whale research. For example:

¶Recent changes in shipping lanes, some compulsory and others voluntary, seem to be reducing collisions between whales and vessels.

¶The Bush administration agreed last year to lower speed limits for large vessels in coastal waters where right whales congregate.

¶Fishing authorities in the United States are beginning to impose gear restrictions designed to reduce the chances whales and other marine mammals will be entangled in fishing lines. Canada is considering similar steps.

¶In December, researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration spotted an unusually large aggregation of right whales in the Gulf of Maine. A month later, a right whale turned up in the Azores, a first since the early 20th century.

¶And last year, probably for the first time since the 1600s, not one North Atlantic right whale died at human hands.

“We are seeing signs of recovery,” Dr. Merrick said. He and others warn that it is far too soon to say the whales are out of danger. Calving seasons are known for their ups and downs. A single whale in the Azores does not prove the species is recolonizing its old haunts. Not everyone embraces the new shipping regulations. And so far this year, five whales have turned up entangled with fishing gear. Rescuers removed all or almost all of the gear from the five, including one whale freed last week after being successfully sedated for the process, a first.

Efforts to protect the whales are costly. Surveying alone costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, said Barb Zoodsma, a NOAA biologist who coordinates survey efforts in the Southeast. In 2003, three researchers and a pilot died when their plane went down off Amelia Island, Florida.

“It’s a very expensive endeavor, and we are very cognizant of that fact,” Ms. Zoodsma said. Some wonder if it is worth it. “We have been pressured by some folks on the outside to say this is a lost cause,” said Greg Silber, who coordinates whale recovery efforts for NOAA, which is charged with protecting marine mammals and endangered species like the right whale.

The whales are so few and distinct in appearance that researchers identify them not just by number but by nickname. The whales are identifiable by patterns of growths on their skin called callosities. These callosities are colonized by pale, licelike creatures in patterns discernable even at a distance.

When survey teams spot a right whale, they can enter its description in an online database maintained by the aquarium and accessible to researchers around the world.

Sightings offer important clues to the movements and habits of the creatures. When the pod of whales was sighted in December, in the Jordan Basin, about 70 miles south of Bar Harbor, the individual whales were well known. But no one had seen them hang out in the basin before. Now, researchers think it may be a previously unknown wintering ground or even a place where whales mate.

When researchers learn where whales are, they can work to keep shippers out of the way. That is what happened in July, when shipping lanes that cross Stellwagen Bank, a national marine sanctuary north of Cape Cod, were moved slightly to the north. “One of the sanctuary staff had documented where the whale sightings were,” Mr. LaCasse said. The lanes now run through a less frequented area. And the sanctuary sends thank-you notes to ships that steer clear of the whales.

A similar change occurred off Saint John, New Brunswick, a hub for shipping oil into the Maritime Provinces. Lanes going into the city were moved a few years ago, after negotiations with the International Maritime Organization. Voluntary lane changes are in effect in places like Boston, Dr. Silber said. “The measured economic impact to mariners was minimal,” he said. But the changes brought “huge benefits” to the animals.

“Compliance appears to be quite high,” he said, adding, “We are optimistic.”

Moira Brown, a senior scientist at the aquarium, said researchers working with Canadian officials designated “an area to be avoided” south of New Brunswick where right whales congregate in summer. “Compliance there has been very good,” Dr. Brown said.

But entanglements with fishing gear continue to be a big problem.

When the researchers spotted Diablo, for example, she had something white on her fluke and, for a few anxious moments, they thought she might be snagged on fishing gear. Instead, like an estimated 80 percent to 85 percent of adult right whales, she carried a scar from a previous entanglement.

Entanglements can be lethal for the whales, Ms. Zoodsma said, especially if lines get caught in whales’ mouths or around their flippers. NOAA trains people to disentangle them, she said, but “when you have a 40-ton animal in a stressful situation” the work can be unpleasant and dangerous. And it is labor intensive. Last week’s effort to sedate and free an entangled whale involved a spotter plane, four boats and multiple attempts, she said. That is why preventing entanglements “is a first priority,” Ms. Zoodsma said. New efforts center on new gear, like lines that lie along the ocean floor or marker buoys that sit at the bottom until a fishing boat finds them electronically and signals them to bob to the surface.

Dr. Brown said the United States was taking a first step in this direction with regulations going into effect this spring. She said discussions were under way with fishing authorities in Canada. Meanwhile, researchers continue efforts to discover as much as they can about where the animals spend their time, what they eat and what natural factors may affect their health. One of their most unusual efforts involved dogs trained to sniff whale scat, which the animals usually produce at the surface. The samples the dogs helped collect offered valuable information about what the whales were eating and where they were feeding. They can also offer hormone clues about whether females are pregnant. Researchers want this information because despite this year’s baby boom, right whales are not reproducing as they should. The scientists want to know if the problem is impaired fertility, spontaneous miscarriage or some other issue.

In their book “The Urban Whale” (Harvard University Press, 2007), Scott D. Kraus and Rosalind M. Rolland, scientists at the aquarium, say they believe the last North American right whale deliberately hunted by people was a calf swimming with its mother off Palm Beach, Fla., in 1935.

But people will continue to kill right whales. Ship strikes “are still going to happen,” Dr. Merrick said. “To totally eliminate them would mean we would have to eliminate shipping.”

In the end, Ms. Zoodsma said, the value of a species is something “each individual has to sort that out for themselves.” But if right whales were to vanish, she said, “it would be a tremendous loss for future generations.”


Read more!

California's drought-resistent gardens are hot

Tangi Quemener Yahoo News 16 Mar 09;

PASADENA, California (AFP) – Even grinding recession has not undone growth in one corner of California's drought-parched landscaping sector, where Robert Cornell has spent more than two decades fine-tuning climate friendly gardens.

In Pasadena, a wealthy suburban area northeast of Los Angeles, amid the rows of luxurious flowers and freshly mowed lawns, there is little sign that California is in a drought emergency after three years of sparse rains.

Nor do passersby see any clues that this type of vegetation best suited for temperate to tropical areas really ought not be thriving in this semi-arid Mediterranean climate.

In California, lawns are "completely out of their natural habitat," said Cornell.

"Here normally, you'd have chapparal, buckweed (types of brush). You would have perennial plants that are designed to burn every 40 and 50 years."

The water that comes out of the tap in this area comes from hundreds of miles (kilometers) away, from the mountains of the state's northeast.

But with the drought dragging on, authorities are not ruling out rationing water to residents; watering restrictions are already in place.

Fortunately, one thing is starting to be uprooted in California: the idea (born in wetter climes) that every American homeowner's dream is a white picket fence with a big green lawn behind it.

Part of the change has come from living with drought; some has to do with people making better-informed decisions taking environmental factors into account -- as well as greater demand for natural, climate-cued gardens.

Kent Shocknek, a local television anchor, is among those who simply like the natural style of the climate-attuned garden. He and his wife, Karen, asked Cornell to help then develop "a landscape as ... green as possible, with as little maintenance as possible.

"We wanted something that would blend with the environment, we wanted something that would be pretty and a little more rustic and wild than something manicured, and anchor the hillside, and keep it from sliding," Shocknek said.

With the garden in place, "we haven't seen our utility bill increase, that's been one of the benefits of Robert's work. Our watering system has been turned off since the last rain."

Around the couple's home, Cornell planted Mexican aloe, different tall grasses, yucca and South African plants such as Mole Purge (euphorbia Lathyrus and Characias).

"If you live in Southern California, it's a desert, we should have drought tolerant plants," said Karen Shocknek.

"It's not just gorgeous and architecturally interesting, they're good for the environment as well."

Back when he was specializing in these types of plants 25 years ago, Cornell thought he could see the future.

"The population in California is increasing, and we only have so much water. And we have drought cycles. Sooner or later, the drought cycle is going to meet the population increase. There's going to be a severe drought and some kind of rationing," he recalls thinking.

Now, he said his typical client is someone who has a concern about the environment, often Democrats, he says.

Though at the time his colleagues thought he was a gardening heretic, "today, in the industry, they realize that if they're not on board, they're not going to have a good reputation. It's the way of the future.

"There's a lot of talk about that. They're becoming very progressive. Today, I see in the industry a lot of people saying, this is probably the future, we've got to get on board," added Cornell.

"Azaleas are very thirsty. People who plant that today are on the wrong side of history," Cornell stressed, just ahead of the fifth World Water Forum, which begins in Istanbul next week with the participation of government officials, business people and civic groups from about 180 countries.

Referring to President Barack Obama's effort to encourage environmentally sound job creation, Cornell joked: "I've been a green collar worker for 25 years!"


Read more!

Netherlands learns to go with the flow

BBC News 16 Mar 09;
The Netherlands throughout its history has had an ongoing struggle with the sea.

Even its mythology reflects this battle, with the story of the little boy who put his finger in a dyke to stop the land being flooded with seawater.

Now, it seems as the tension between land and water is set to reach a new level as rising sea levels and overflowing rivers leave this low-lying nation increasingly vulnerable.

"Just let it come; we can't hold it back anyway," farmer Fons Bergmans tells the Television Trust for the Environment's (TVE) Earth Report programme.

"If it does come, we'll try to make the best of it."

Mr Bergmans' family has farmed the land near Maastricht on the Dutch-Belgian border for generations.

The farm is located on an island in the River Maas, one of the nation's five major rivers.

Lessons from history

In 1993, Mr Bergmans recalls, heavy rainfall caused the river to flood with devastating results.

"It was just before Christmas. The house was full of fast flowing water. In one day, the water reached about 60cm (2ft)."

The flood wreaked havoc across the whole region, destroying homes and ruining livelihoods. Some areas were cut off for more than a week.

"Sometimes, we saw hovercrafts passing by outside," Mr Bergmans reflected. "It's the kind of experience that you could not imagine and we hope it will never happen again."

The Netherlands only exists as a result of the lowlands' extensive flood and sea defences because two thirds of the nation's population lives below sea level.

For centuries, it has relied solely on defensive walls - called dykes - to defend them from flooding.

Windmills, an iconic image of the region, were not just for making flour, but for pumping water from the land.

In the devastating North Sea flood of 1953, which affected much of northern Europe, almost 2,000 people in the Netherlands lost their lives.

One of the lessons learned was that walls and dykes were not enough to tame the seas.

Over the following 30 years, the Dutch constructed huge barriers to protect coastal cities. But 50 years later, the predicted impacts of climate change have put the country's flood defences back under the spotlight.

Researcher Louise Fresco, a flood adviser to the Dutch government, says that the nation faces two main threats.

"One is rising sea level," she explained.

"The other is major discharges through the rivers, due to high rainfall in the future.

"The combination of rising sea level and water from the rivers poses a clear and present danger."

According to research recently presented at a key climate change science conference in Copenhagen, sea levels are rising much faster than predicted.

If widespread flooding was to hit the Netherlands, millions of people would have to be evacuated.

But if it happened tomorrow, the nation would not be able to cope, warns Professor Fresco.

"Our system is not up to standard to deal with very large quantities of water - especially if they come suddenly."

The government's response is a National Water Plan, an overhaul of the country's defences costing billions of euros.

The initiative is designed also to raise public awareness of the dangers of climate change.

"Dutch people are not afraid of water; we live below sea level," says Tineke Huizinga, Deputy Minister for Transport and Water.

"Sometimes it would be better if the Dutch people were a little bit more afraid. Now, with climate change, it really is important to take measures and to really do things."

Last year, the government staged a five-day mock evacuation to test the country's readiness for severe flooding.

The results were not reassuring. If it had been a real flood, an estimated 4,000 people would have lost their lives.

Going with the flow

To protect coastal communities and strengthen sand dunes and beaches, millions of tonnes of sand are dredged from the sea bed and redistributed near to or on the shoreline.

However, as Tineke Huizinga explains, an even more radical project is underway for the Netherlands' rivers.

"We used to have these dykes to keep the water in place, but now we have learnt we have to make places were the water can flow in [floods].

"It is an enormous project through the whole country for more than 40 places where we have to 'make room for the river', as we call it."

One example of this work involves one thousand hectares (2,500 acres) that will become a flood zone, including 40 hectares owned by Fons Bergmans.

Professor Fresco says the Dutch have been complacent in recent decades about the threat posed by water.

"I think we are now moving into a situation where we're thinking again about water, not only as something to be controlled, but also something which is part of our environment, our habitat and something that we have to live with.

"We are very optimistic about the new creativity that is generated by thinking through how we live with water in the future."

One person with a vision of how the Dutch can adapt to the "living with water" lifestyle is architect Alexander Henny.

He is one of the country's top designers of floating houses, and calls his practice "Aquatecture".

"There's a concrete foundation that floats, which is hard to understand for most people, but because it is hollow it is lighter than the water," he told the programme.

"In the lower part of the house, which is submerged, are the sleeping quarters. On the top is the living room and kitchen."

But living on the water is still only for a tiny proportion of the population. The government has stated that its emphasis is to protect those on land.

Professor Fresco said flood prevention policies should take an ecological approach.

"We should try to use the forces of nature to protect the country where possible," she explained.

"The main area where this is feasible is coastal protection, dragging up sands from the North Sea and have the currents actually deposit sand to extend the coastline, broaden the beaches and offer major protection."

The Television Trust for the Environment's (TVE) Earth Report - Going with the flow - will be broadcast on the BBC World News Channel on 13-19 March 2009. Please check schedules for further details


Read more!

Water forum seeks way through worsening crisis

Yahoo News 15 Mar 09;

ISTANBUL (AFP) – Politicians, corporate executives, engineers and greens gather here on Monday for a week-long arena aimed at tackling the planet's fast-growing water crisis.

Around 20,000 people are expected for the Fifth World Water Forum in the Turkish city of Istanbul, where a charged agenda awaits them.

Access to clean water and sanitation, river pollution, madcap extraction of aquifers, jockeying for water rights and the impact of climate change have turned the stuff of life into a fiercely contentious issue.

The Forum, held only every three years, has been foreshadowed by a report issued by a constellation of UN agencies.

In 348 pages, their document, published last Thursday, warned of a triple whammy in which supplies of freshwater were being viciously squeezed by demographic pressure, waste and drought.

It spoke of a "global water crisis" with plenty of potential for instability and conflict.

Loic Fauchon, head of the World Water Council which is organising the Istanbul meeting, said the facts amounted to a glaring message that times have changed.

"The era of easy water is over. We have to embark on policies for regulating demand," Fauchon said in Paris last week.

"Over the last 50 years, water policies around the world have focused on providing ever more water. Absolutely no thought was given to water consumption, which has reached shameless proportions in some countries."

He added: "All of us, around the world, have to ask questions about our relationship with water and work to use less of it."

Hydrologists point to some notorious acts of water vandalism over the last century.

They include the desiccation of the Aral Sea, once the world's fourth largest inland lake, by Soviet-era plans to grow cotton in the central Asian desert.

There is Saddam Hussein's destruction of the Iraqi wetlands, an act deemed an assault on the so-called "Marsh Arabs" who opposed his rule.

Less visible, but also massively destructive, is over-irrigation, in which water is used to grow thirsty crops in scorching climates and soils that are naturally parched. California's Imperial Valley and Australia's Murray-Darling river system are often cited for such waste.

Then there is the damming of rivers for hydro-electric projects, which affects flows downstream, and the frenzied extraction of "fossil water" -- underground aquifers that took hundreds of thousands of years to build up.

Amplifying the problem is climate change, affecting patterns of rainfall and snowfall.

Water scarcity has the potential to stoke unrest, frictions within countries and conflicts between states, according to the UN document, the Third World Water Development Report.

"Conflicts about water can occur at all scales," the report warned.

"Hydrologic shocks that may occur through climate change increase the risk of major national and international security threats, especially in unstable areas."

One objective of the Istanbul meeting is to develop ways of avoiding these feared "water wars" by encouraging agreements on sharing the use of rivers, lakes and aquifers that straddle boundaries.

Sources close to the conference expect the announcement of a three-way deal between Turkey, Iraq and Syria over the sharing of waters of the Tigris and Euphrates, the two rivers that reputedly fed the Garden of Eden.

The conference will kick off with a mini-summit, hosted by Turkey, gathering around 14 countries, before splitting up into debates on six themes on water management and conservation.

This will culminate in a three-day ministerial-level meeting, gathering 107 countries, that will issue a non-binding statement of recommendations on March 22.

On the sidelines of the political meeting is a major fair gathering actors in the water business, from large corporations dealing in drinking water and sanitation to inventors peddling rainwater harvesting.

Global Forum Seeks To Avert Water Crisis
Alexandra Hudson and Thomas Grove, PlanetArk 16 Mar 09;

ISTANBUL - Government ministers from 120 countries, scientists and campaigners meet in Istanbul this week to discuss how to avert a global water crisis and ease tensions between states fighting over rivers, lakes and glaciers.

Nearly half of the world's people will be living in areas of acute water shortage by 2030, the United Nations warned last week, and an estimated 1 billion people remain without access to safe drinking water and sanitation.

The world's population of 6.6 billion is forecast to rise by 2.5 billion by 2050. Most of the growth will be in developing countries, much of it in regions where water is already scarce.

As populations and living standards rise, a global water crisis looms unless countries take urgent action, the international body said.

"Water is not enough of a political issue," said Daniel Zimmer, associate general of the World Water Council, one of the organisations behind the World Water Forum.

"One of the targets is to make politicians understand that water should be higher up on their domestic agenda and care that it is a necessity for the welfare, stability and health of their populations."

Because of the lack of political attention, hundreds of millions of people remain trapped in poverty and ill health and exposed to the risk of water-related disasters, the UN warns.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said water scarcity is a "potent fuel for wars and conflict."

Water shortages have been named as a major underlying cause of the conflict in Darfur in western Sudan. Water is also a major issue between Israel and its Arab neighbours, and the states of Central Asia, one of the world's driest places, where thirsty crops such as cotton and grain remain the main source of livelihood.

Tajikistan has asked World Water Forum organisers to mediate in its dispute with Kyrgyzstan over water during the conference, World Water Forum Vice Secretary Ahmet Mete Saatci told Reuters.

Other subjects on the agenda for the talks from March 16-22 will be how to avert catastrophic floods and droughts as climate patterns change, and how the global financial crisis threatens to hit large-scale water infrastructure projects within the next several years.

The heads of state, environment and development ministers, scientists and development organisations hope to draw up a list of recommendations to help safeguard water resources and to share experiences where projects have been successful.

Among the heads of states attending the conference is Iraq's President Jalal Talabani.


Read more!

Greenland thaw among feared climate shifts by 2200

Alister Doyle, PlanetArk 17 Mar 09;

OSLO (Reuters) - A drastic climate shift such as a thaw of Greenland's ice or death of the Amazon forest is more than 50 percent likely by the year 2200 in cases of strong global warming, according to a survey of experts.

The poll of 52 scientists, looking 100 years beyond most forecasts, also revealed worries that long-term warming would trigger radical changes such as the disintegration of the ice sheet in West Antarctica, raising world sea levels.

"There's concern about the risks of massive changes in the climate system," said Elmar Kriegler of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, lead author of the study in the U.S. journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Huge changes or "tipping points," which might also include a slowdown of the warm Gulf Stream current that keeps Europe warm, are often dismissed as highly unlikely or scaremongering.

The survey issued late on Monday found that leading experts, when asked, reckoned there was a one in six chance of triggering at least one tipping point with a moderate temperature rise of between 2 and 4 Celsius (3.6-7.2 Fahrenheit) by 2200 from 2000.

But with a strong rise of between 4 and 8 Celsius by 2200, the chances of surpassing at least one of five tipping points reviewed rose to 56 percent.

"The study shows that some of these events are not considered low probability," Kriegler told Reuters of the study, with colleagues in Germany and Britain.

He said the poll was relevant to government policymakers because any of the climate shifts examined would have huge economic impacts.

"The results of the survey provide further evidence for the need of ambitious climate protection in order to minimize the risks of far-reaching consequences for our entire planet," Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute who was among the authors, said in a statement.

GREENLAND

Most likely of five tipping points was the onset by 2200 of a longer-term Greenland thaw that would make it largely ice free. Greenland contains enough water to raise world sea levels by 7 meters if it ever all melted.

Second most likely was a death of large tracts of the Amazon rainforest because of a drying trend, followed by the start of a disintegration of the West Antarctic ice sheet, which would raise seas by about 5 meters.

The other two potential tipping points, a collapse of the system of Atlantic currents including the Gulf Stream and a shift toward a constant El Nino warming of the Pacific Ocean, were considered far less likely.

The survey was taken in late 2005 and early 2006, in parallel with much of the writing of the last U.N. Climate Panel report that said that a build-up of greenhouse gases from human activities was the main cause of warming.

That U.N. report focused only on the coming century and said that "abrupt climate changes...are not considered likely to occur in the 21st century."

(Editing by Charles Dick)


Read more!

Financial crisis hits wood industry, forests still vulnerable

PlanetArk 17 Mar 09;

ROME (Reuters) - The global financial crisis and the collapse of the housing sector are a big blow for wood industries, but this is not necessarily good news for the world's forests, a new U.N. report said on Monday.

The report, published ahead of a conference on forestry held in Rome by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), noted new housing starts in the United States had more than halved between 2006 and 2008. Several other countries, particularly in western Europe, have witnessed similar declines.

"Wood demand is unlikely to reach the peak of 2005-2006 again in the foreseeable future," the FAO's "State of the World's Forests 2009" report said.

"Scaling down of production is widespread in almost all countries and all forest industries, from logging to sawmilling to production of wood panels, pulp, paper and furniture," it said.

Countries that are highly dependent on U.S. markets, such as Brazil and Canada, have already been severely affected, the report said, adding wood fiber demand in North America alone was expected to fall by more than 20 million tonnes this year.

While lower wood demand should be good news for the world's disappearing forests, FAO said the economic crisis could reduce investment in sustainable forest management and favor illegal logging.

"A more general concern is that some governments may dilute previously ambitious green goals or defer key policy decisions related to future climate change mitigation," the report said.

It said European Union measures to tackle climate change, particularly auctioning emission allowances, were meeting some resistance, and the U.N.'s REDD scheme -- aimed at using carbon credits to save rainforests -- could face similar problems.

Worldwide, the loss of forests was 7.3 million hectares (18.04 million acres) a year between 2000 and 2005, equivalent to 200 square km per day, according to U.N. data. Deforestation accounts for 20 percent of man-made carbon emissions.

(Reporting by Silvia Aloisi; editing by James Jukwey)

Forests 'facing a testing time'
Mark Kinver, BBC News 16 Mar 09;

World forests face the dual challenge of climate change and the global economic crisis, a key UN report says.

It suggested that although the economic slowdown might reduce deforestation rates in the short term, it was also likely to lead to other problems.

One concern, would be a lack of investment in the sector and in forestry management.

The study by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) was published on Monday.

It is timed to coincide with the start of UN World Forest Week.

CTS Nair, one of the report's lead authors and the FAO Forestry Department's chief economist, said the economic crisis was having "tremendous impacts - both positive and negative".

"You will find the forestry industries in a number of countries almost on the verge of collapse," he told BBC News.

For example, he said the construction of starter homes in the US and Canada had fallen from about two million units at the end of 2005 to less than 500,000 now.

This had led to a dramatic fall in the demand for wood products, which was affecting forest-based industries and export markets in developing nations.

However, Mr Nair added, the downturn was having some beneficial effects.

"We are seeing a decline in the prices of soya beans, palm oil and rubber etc," he explained.

"The prices have fallen drastically, so this means that the incentives for cultivating these crops have also gone down.

"As a result, the pressure to clear primary forest stands is also declining."

Mixed picture

The report, State of the World's Forests 2009, also showed that the health of forests varied from region to region of the world.

"We see advances being made in places like Europe, but losses being made in places like Africa and especially developing countries," Mr Nair observed.

"For example, what we see in the case of Africa is that there is a growing population yet the productivity within agriculture has remained extremely low.

"There is very little diversification in terms of sources of income so there is a very high dependency level on land use and natural resources, such as timber."

"On the other hand, in places such as Asia where there has been rapid economic growth, people have moved out of agriculture to some extent and the pressure on the land has declined."

In recent years, the importance of the world's forests as carbon sinks has featured prominently in global climate policy discussions.

An initiative called Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (Redd), which is likely to involve developed nations paying tropical forest-rich nations not to cut down trees, appears to be gaining support.

Mr Nair gave the scheme a cautious welcome: "In theory, it is an excellent idea but its implementation is going to be extremely tricky.

"If you look at the people involved in forest clearing, it is different people in different regions.

"For example, in Latin America, it is largely cattle rangers and soya bean planters. In South-East Asia, it is palm oil and rubber plantations.

"What we find is that it is not the smallholders, it is the big players who are working within a global market.

"So far, only the issue of what it is trying to achieve has been examined, the issue of how we are going to implement it has not really been discussed or examined."

FAO launches latest report on the State of the World’s Forests 2009
FAO website 16 Mar 09;

16 March 2009, Rome – The dual challenges of economic turmoil and climate change are bringing the management of forests to the forefront of global interest. The need to reform forestry institutions and increase investments in science and technology are key to the better management of forests, notes the State of the World’s Forests 2009 launched today.

A highly mixed situation is expected, with gains in forest area in some regions and losses in others, notes the report. Countries in the early stages of development in particular tend to struggle with immense pressures on their forests. The trade-offs between immediate economic compulsions and long term benefits are challenging. Institutional weaknesses remain the most important problem, but also the most difficult to solve.

“Adapting forestry institutions to rapid changes in the larger environment is a major challenge”, says Jan Heino, Assistant Director-General of FAO’s Forestry Department. Of particular importance is the need to re-invent public sector forestry agencies that have been slow in adapting to changing customer needs, said Mr. Heino.

Global demand for products and environmental services is expected to increase in the coming decades, notes the report. Energy and climate change policies are increasing the use of wood as a source of energy, although this trend may be affected by the recent economic down-turn.

Effect of global economic crisis

In the short term forests and forestry are greatly impacted by the global economic crisis, notes the report. Reduced demand for wood and wood products as a result of the collapse in the housing sector and the credit crunch are having a severe negative impact on investments in industries and also on forest management.

A general concern is that some governments may dilute previously ambitious green goals or defer key policy decisions related to climate change mitigation and adaptation as they focus on reversing the economic downturn, the report said. Initiatives such as those for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation that are dependent on international financial transfers could also face problems.

Furthermore, contraction of formal economic sectors often opens opportunities for expansion of the informal sector and could lead to more illegal logging.

Green path to development

But there are also opportunities stemming from the current crisis. Increased attention on “green development” could provide a new direction to the development of the forest sector. Planting trees, increased investments in sustainable forest management, and active promotion of wood in green building practices and renewable energy will all become integral parts of “green development,” notes the report.

Regional disparities

Forest resources in Europe are expected to continue to expand in view of declining land dependence, increasing income, concern for protection of the environment and well developed policy and institutional frameworks. Europe accounts for about 17 percent of global land area but has one-quarter of the world’s forest resources, approximately 1 billion hectares, of which 81 percent is in the Russian Federation. I

In South America, the pace of deforestation is unlikely to decline in the near future, despite low population density. High food and fuel prices will favour continued forest clearance for production of livestock and agricultural crops for food, feed and biofuel.

In Africa, forest loss is likely to continue at current rates. The growing demand for, and rising price of, food and energy will exacerbate the situation, especially as increased investments in infrastructure open up new areas. Increasing frequency of droughts, declining water supplies and floods strain coping mechanisms at the local and national levels and undermine efforts to manage African forests sustainably.

In Asia and the Pacific, home to more than half of the world’s population with some of the most densely populated countries in the world, demand for wood and wood products is expected to continue to increase in line with the growth in population and income.

Growth in the demand for primary commodities owing to rapid industrialization of emerging economies is likely to result in forest conversion in other countries within and outside the region. While the region is a leader in planted forests, it will continue to depend on wood from other regions, as land and water constraints will limit the scope for self-sufficiency in wood and wood products.

The near future of forestry in North America will depend on how quickly the region reverses the recent economic downturn and its impact on the demand for wood and wood products, especially in the United States of America, noted the report. The forest sector will also need to address challenges of climate change, including increasing frequency and severity of forest fires and damage by invasive pest species.


Read more!

Financial crisis could help water investment

Yahoo News 16 Mar 09;

ISTANBUL (AFP) – Tens of billions of dollars are needed annually to fix the world's water systems, but policies to address the global financial crisis could help meet the target, the OECD says.

In a report to the World Water Forum in Istanbul, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says demands for fresh water are soaring while resources, under mounting stress, urgently need to be conserved.

Meeting these twin challenges will require investment on an unprecedented scale, it says.

In the United States alone, 23 billion dollars will be needed annually over the next 20 years, a figure that does not take into account dams, dikes and waterway maintenance.

France and Britain will have to boost water spending as a share of GDP by about 20 percent, just to maintain services at current levels, while Japan and South Korea will need to make increases of more than 40 percent.

The report, "Managing Water for All," is to be officially unveiled on Tuesday, at the second day of the seven-day Istanbul conference.

Interviewed by AFP, Angel Gurria, the OECD's secretary-general, admitted the world's economic crisis cast a shadow over the ability to muster such huge sums, including in development aid.

But, he said, hope lies in the plans set by the United States, China, European countries and others to spend massively in infrastructure to steer their economies out of the path of recession.

"There is a lot of investment that has do be done in normal time," he said.

"So now, in exceptionally difficult times, yes, the danger (to investment flows) exists, but some of our hopes are in these exceptional packages."

He admitted: "Many of these packages have very broad headlines and you do not really know what's inside the box.

"But it's a message to send," he said. "With a few tens of billions of dollars... the benefits (gained) are for millions of people, and it changes life forever -- it's not just a question of living one day better."

The OECD report noted that, already, some 880 million people do not have access to decent sources of drinking water, while 2.5 billion people do not have access to proper sanitation.

Adding to demand is population growth, estimated at 80 million souls a year, in addition to the more than 6.5 billion humans already on the planet. By 2050, there are expected to be nine billion people.

Feeding them and growing biofuels will place a major strain on water, particularly by agriculture, which already takes up 70 percent of available fresh water.

A first step for countries is to step up "water governance," making utilities more accountable for stopping waste.

Even well-run water utilities in rich countries suffer leakages of between 10 and 30 percent. Singapore sets the world record for efficiency, with water loss of less than five percent.

In developing countries, though, leakage is typically more than 40 percent and sometimes far higher. In Maputo, the capital of Mozambique, 60 percent of water is lost before it reaches the customer.

The report calls for a smart mix of what it calls the "three Ts" -- tariffs, taxes and transfers that can be blended to improve water supplies, cut down on waste and help the poor.

Subsidies or price support have to be targeted for those who need it most, it says. Too little help means the poor suffer while water that is cheap for all encourages waste and a decline in service.

"If you keep tariffs very low, then the system does not receive enough revenue and inevitably, the quality deteriorates, which produces sickness or insufficient amounts of water, or you can't sustain the service," Gurria explained.

"Then people become victims of water sharks: the people who have access to water -- generally, bad quality water -- and sell it or resell it at incredible prices."

The UN's Third World Water Development Report, issued ahead of the Istanbul conference, said investment of between 92.4 and 148 billion dollars would be needed annually in water supplies and waste-water services from 2006 to 2025.

Up to 51.4 billion dollars would have to be spent in China and developed countries in Asia, each year.


Read more!

Financial crisis a chance to tackle climate change

Martin Abbugao Yahoo News 16 Mar 09;

SINGAPORE (AFP) – Measures to help ease climate change should be integrated into massive stimulus packages aimed at fighting the global economic crisis, environmental groups and government officials said.

There are fears some countries may backslide on commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as they focus on reviving their recession-hit economies, but the two objectives can go hand-in-hand, they said.

Investments in clean energy and other environment-friendly projects can eventually create millions of "green collar" jobs and help cushion the impact of retrenchments in older, polluting industries, they added.

"We are confronted with a massive opportunity to recreate our economies in a way that will lay the foundations for strong, sustainable growth in the future," Greenpeace International spokesperson Stephanie Tunmore told AFP.

"World leaders have a perfect opportunity to develop stimulus packages that cut greenhouse gas emissions and create green jobs."

Some countries have taken the lead, including the United States under President Barack Obama.

Clean energy is a major component of Obama's 787-billion-dollar economic stimulus package, with the US leader vowing to pump 15 billion dollars a year into developing technologies such as wind power and solar energy.

He plans to double the country's supply of renewable energy in the next three years. There is also funding for training workers in the new fields.

In Asia, governments have rolled out spending measures worth at least 1.1 trillion dollars since October, many of them focused on infrastructure, help for companies to access capital, and doleouts to boost consumer buying.

Economists are urging a second round of spending packages, and environmental groups hope these would include measures to protect the environment.

"A global 'green' stimulus package could deliver immediate economic benefits, reduce the risk of catastrophic climate change and reduce sources of global instability such as energy insecurity and resource competition," Tunmore of Greenpeace said.

Indonesia, the world's fourth most populous country, has incorporated a green component in its six-billion-dollar stimulus package, Trade Minister Mari Pangestu said.

Among other measures, the government has accelerated a mandatory requirement to have biofuels take up five percent of the national energy mix, she said.

"It's a green objective and there's a tax incentive as well built in," she said in an interview. "It also creates demand for our palm oil at a time when external markets are declining."

British Minister for Trade and Investment Gareth Thomas said clean energy offers vast overseas opportunities for local businesses.

The British government is helping companies with expertise in renewable energy and constructing energy-efficient buildings to expand abroad.

"We want to encourage British businesses to see the huge changes that are coming down the line from the worldwide shift that is going to be towards low-carbon economies," he said during a recent visit to Singapore.

Talks are underway for a new global climate change treaty scheduled to be signed in Denmark in December, with rich and developing nations trying to reach a compromise on emission targets to replace the Kyoto Protocol which expires in 2012.

However, workers in industries such as steel and manufacturing fear strict caps will raise production costs and lead to massive job losses.

Some developing countries also say drastic emission cuts could compromise their economic growth, but environmental groups argue otherwise.

"Contrary to perceptions by some, climate change solutions are more labour-intensive than conventional energy and have been proven in many countries as a jobs creator and a good way to stimulate the economy," said Rafael Senga, Asia Pacific manager for energy policy at the World Wildlife Fund.

Greenpeace cited a report by the UN Environment Programme which estimated that at least 2.3 million jobs are currently available in the renewable energy sector, and the number is likely to rise to more than 20 million by 2030.

Improving energy efficiency in buildings alone could create 3.5 million jobs in Europe and the United States by 2030, the report said.

Environmental groups warned of dire consequences if world leaders allow the economic crisis to weaken their resolve to tackle climate change.

"Unlike the economic recession that can be solved in a few years' time, the impact of climate change on the planet's life support systems and the global economy will be permanent if we fail to act urgently," said Senga of the WWF.


Read more!

China appeals to exclude exports in climate deal

Shaun Tandon Yahoo News 16 Mar 09;

WASHINGTON (AFP) – China appealed Monday to exclude its giant export sector in the next treaty on climate change, saying rich countries buying its products should bear responsibility for emissions in manufacturing.

"It is a very important item to make a fair agreement," senior Chinese climate official Li Gao said during a visit to Washington.

Climate envoys from China, Japan and the European Union were holding talks with US President Barack Obama's administration as the clock ticks to a December conference in Copenhagen meant to draft a post-Kyoto Protocol deal.

But hopes were fading of reaching a comprehensive treaty, with the United States still working out the scope of its new commitment to fighting global warming under Obama.

Developed nations demand that growing developing countries such as China and India take action under the new treaty. They had no obligations under the Kyoto Protocol, leading Obama's predecessor George W. Bush to reject it.

Some statistics say China has now surpassed the United States as the top emitter of carbon emissions blamed for global warming. But Li said that up to 20 percent of China's emissions were from producing exports.

"We are at the low end of the production line for the global economy," Li told a forum.

"We produce products and these products are consumed by other countries, especially the developed countries. This share of emissions should be taken by the consumers but not the producers," he said.

Li said Beijing was not trying to avoid action on climate change, noting that Obama in his address to Congress last month said China "has launched the largest effort in history to make their economy energy efficient."

Li's remarks met immediate skepticism, with other negotiators saying it would be a logistical nightmare to find a way to regulate carbon emissions at exports' destination.

Top EU climate negotiator Artur Runge-Metzger noted that the European Union, the Kyoto Protocol's champion, includes major exporters but said they counted emissions as produced on their territory.

Asking importers to handle emissions "would mean that we would also like them to have jurisdiction and legislative powers in order to control and limit those and I'm not sure whether my Chinese colleague would agree on that particular point," Runge-Metzger said.

China's chief climate official, Xie Zhenhua, was also in Washington where he met with US global warming pointman Todd Stern on how to work together on climate change.

"The meetings went extremely well this morning, but there?s a lot of work to do," State Department spokesman Robert Wood said.

Japan's chief negotiator Shinsuke Sugiyama said that Asia's largest economy -- which is struggling to meet its own obligations under the Kyoto treaty reached in its ancient capital -- was watching Washington and Beijing.

"Japan will not repeat Kyoto in the sense that at Kyoto we were not able to involve the biggest emitters in the world by now -- and that means the United States of America and China," Sugiyama said.

Li hit back that Japan, not China, was among countries with "historical responsibility" for global warming -- which UN scientists say threatens entire species if left unchecked.

"If I were Japanese, I would be very proud of the Kyoto Protocol. It seems the ambassador is not," Li said.

Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change which organized the forum, said that negotiators should be ready to aim for setting only a framework in Copenhagen.

"We can still make very substantial progress toward a final agreement and perhaps the best way to do that is aiming for a strong interim agreement in Copenhagen," she said.

Runge-Metzger said the EU believed the world now had the political will for an agreement in Copenhagen but conceded: "It doesn't have to be a deal that goes into each and every technical detail."

China Wants Importers To Cover Some Emission Costs
Richard Cowan, PlanetArk 17 Mar 09;

WASHINGTON - Countries that buy Chinese goods should be held responsible for the carbon dioxide emitted by the factories that make them in any global plan to reduce greenhouse gases, a Chinese official said on Monday.

"About 15 percent to 25 percent of China's emissions come from the products which we make for the world, which should not be taken by us," said Gao Li, director of China's Department of Climate Change.

Speaking at a forum sponsored by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Gao added that "this share of emission should be taken by the consumers, not the producers" and called the demand a "very important item to make (for a) fair agreement."

Gao gave no further details of his proposal, which could nevertheless be controversial as countries like the United States already fear that controlling domestic emissions will lead to sharply higher energy prices and possible job losses.

China, like the United States, did not join the 17-year-old Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing global emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants linked to climate change problems.

With an economy that has been booming on its export of manufactured goods, China's greenhouse gas emissions also have been growing and are now thought to be around par with those in the United States, which has been the leading emitting nation.

China is the top source of imports into the United States, followed by Canada and Mexico.

DECEMBER DEADLINE?

Backers of a new international deal to control climate-warming emissions hope a pact is embraced in Copenhagen in December, although they acknowledge that timetable might be ambitious.

In the meantime, international interest in curbing climate change is growing, led by President Barack Obama's pledge to put the United States on a path to cut emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, with an additional 80 percent reduction by 2050.

Legislation to create a cap-and-trade system to limit businesses' emissions could begin moving through the US Congress in coming months. But enactment of such a bill might not be possible before the Copenhagen meeting. If not, environmentalists worry it could discourage other countries from signing onto a deal there.

But even without a comprehensive agreement, Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, said negotiators could try to achieve a "strong interim agreement" that would set forth a framework, possibly including a range of targets for countries to reduce emissions.

Shinsuke Sugiyama, director general for global issues at Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told the Pew forum that his government views 2009 as a "make or break" year in achieving progress on a new global deal.

But noting that the Kyoto Protocol has only covered about 30 percent of global emissions because key economies did not sign on, Sugiyama warned: "My government is very much determined not to repeat what Kyodo does give us...in the sense that we were not able to involve United States of America...and other countries like China."

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)


Read more!

What message, and whose, from Copenhagen?

Mike Hulme, BBC Green Room 16 Mar 09;

Last week's climate science conference in Copenhagen concluded with a declaration saying that the most serious warnings on climate change were coming true, and calling for immediate "action". But, argues Mike Hulme in the Green Room, it is not clear what action was being called for, nor precisely who was calling for it.

The Copenhagen conference brought between 2,000 and 2,500 researchers from around the world.

The three days saw 600 oral presentations (together with several hundred posters on display) on topics ranging from the ethics of energy sufficiency to the role of icons in communicating climate change to the dynamics of continental ice sheets.

I attended the conference, chaired a session, listened to several presentations, read a number of posters and talked with dozens of colleagues from around the world.

The breadth of research on climate change being presented was impressive, as was the vigour and thoughtfulness of the informal discussions during coffee breaks, evening receptions and side-meetings.

What intrigued me most, however, was the final conference statement issued on the closing day, a statement drafted by the conference's scientific writing team.

It contained six key messages and was handed to the Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

A fuller version will be prepared and circulated to key negotiators and politicians ahead of the annual UN climate summit, to be held this year in December, also in Copenhagen.

Last week's conference has been widely reported as one at which the world's scientists delivered a "final warning" to negotiators about the necessity for a powerful political deal on climate.

Some commentators branded it "The Emergency Science Conference".

The six key messages include statements that:

* "the worst-case IPCC scenario trajectories (or even worse) are being realised"
* "there is no excuse for inaction"
* "the influence of vested interests that increase emissions" must be reduced
* "regardless of how dangerous climate change is defined", rapid, sustained and effective mitigation is required to avoid reaching it

There is a fair amount of "motherhood and apple pie" involved in the 600-word statement - who could disagree, for example, that climate risks are felt unevenly across the world, or that we need sustainable jobs?

But there are two aspects of the statement which are noteworthy and on which I would like to reflect: whose views does it represent, and what are the "actions" being called for?

Copenhagen consensus?

The Copenhagen conference was no Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) event.

It was not a process initiated and conducted by the world's governments; there was no systematic synthesis, assessment and review of research findings as in the IPCC, and there was certainly no collective mechanism enabling the 2,000-plus researchers to consider drafts of the six key messages or to offer their own suggestions for what politicians may need to hear.

The conference was in fact convened by no established academic or professional body.

Unlike the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) or the UK's Royal Society - which also hold large conferences and from time to time issue carefully worded statements representing the views of professional bodies - this conference was organised by the International Alliance of Research Universities (IARU).

This little-heard-of coalition, launched in January 2006, consists of 10 of the world's self-proclaimed elite universities, including of course the University of Copenhagen.

IARU is not accountable to anyone and has no professional membership.

The statement therefore simply carries the weight of the secretariat of this ad-hoc conference, directed and steered by 10 self-elected universities.

The six key messages are not the collective voice of 2,000 researchers, nor are they the voice of established bodies such as the WMO. Neither do they arise from a collective endeavour of experts, for example through a considered process of screening, synthesising and reviewing.

Instead they were drafted largely before the conference started by the organising committee, sifting through research that they saw emerging around the world - some of it peer-reviewed, some of it not - and interpreting it for a political audience.

Taxing times

Which leads me to the second curiosity about this conference statement: what exactly is the "action" the conference statement is calling for? Are these messages expressing the findings of science or are they expressing political opinions?

I have no problem with scientists offering clear political messages as long as they are clearly recognised as such; and the conference chair herself, Professor Katherine Richardson, has described the messages as politically motivated. All well and good.

But then we need to be clear about what authority these political messages carry - that of the people who drafted them, and no more.

Which brings us back to the calls for action and the "inexcusability of inaction". What action, exactly?

During the conference there were debates amongst the experts about whether a carbon tax or carbon trading is the way to go. There were debates about whether or not we should abandon the "two degrees" target as unachievable, and whether there's a need to start researching and promoting a portfolio of geo-engineering strategies.

There were debates about the epistemological limits to model-based predictions of the future, and many other subjects besides - even the role of religion in curbing climate change.

These are all valid debates to have, and many of them mixed science, values, ethics and politics.

It therefore seems problematic to me when such lively, well-informed and yet largely unresolved debates get reduced to six key messages, messages that on the one hand carry the aura of urgency, precision and scientific authority - "there is no excuse for inaction" - and yet at the same time remain so imprecise as to dictate or resolve nothing in political terms.

In fact, we are politically no further forward after last week's conference. All options for attending to climate change - all political options - are, rightly, still on the table.

Is it to be a carbon tax or carbon trading? Do we stick with 'two degrees' or abandon it?

Do we promote geo-engineering or do we not? Do we coerce lifestyle change or not?

Do we invest in direct poverty alleviation in poorer countries, or in the New Green Deal in richer ones?

Mere urgency, especially precipitous urgency - the mantra of the new "Not Stupid" campaign launched in the UK last weekend - is not enough.

A gathering of international scientists and researchers has resolved nothing of the politics of climate change.

But then why should it? All that can be told - and certainly should be told - is that climate change brings new and changed risks, that these risks can have a range of significant implications under different conditions, that there is an array of political considerations to be taken into account when judging what needs to be done, and there is a portfolio of powerful, but somewhat untested, policy measures that could be tried.

The rest is all politics. And we should let politics decide, without being ambushed by a chimera of political prescriptiveness dressed up as (false) scientific unanimity.

Mike Hulme is a professor in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA), and was the founding director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research

The Green Room is a series of opinion article on environmental topics running weekly on the BBC News website


Read more!