Best of our wild blogs: 21 Nov 08


Discovering a new Singapore shore
on the sgbeachbum blog

Tragedy of a road kill: Mountain Bulbul II
on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog

Wildfacts updates: flatworms, bristleworms and more worms
on the wild shores of singapore blog

Updates on dredging and other works on our shores
at Sungei Serangoon, near Pulau Jong and near Cyrene Reefs on the wild shores of singapore blog.

Blue dragon
on the annotated budak blog

Adventures in the Mud on 6 & 7 Dec (Sat & Sun)
A talk by Siva, walk and specimen examination at Sungei Buloh, on the habitatnews blog

Animal detectives at Explore Singapore!
about the Raffles Museum on the Singapore's Heritage, Museums & Nostalgia blog

Reef Check's Singing Contest
submit by 31 Dec 08, on the singapore celebrates our reefs blog

Sustainable Manufacturing: Greening your Processes
on AsiaIsGreen


Read more!

Australian autopsy finds plastic in whale

Paul Carter Australian Associated Press
The Australian 20 Nov 08;

PIECES of plastic found in a dead whale's stomach in Tasmania has prompted authorities to repeat a warning against marine litter.

Government marine officer Isabel Beasley said a post-mortem on an adult Pygmy Right Whale washed up on Tasmania's east coast found two plastic caps inside its stomach.

The plastic tops were about four centimetres in diameter, reasonably large to be carrying around in the six metre long, baleen whale's stomach, Dr Beasley said.

"Although we don't know if the plastic tops caused the death of the animal, we do know that sickness or debilitation can cause whales to come inshore and strand," she said.

Dr Beasley said the discovery of the plastic tops is a reminder as to why people need to be careful with the way rubbish and marine debris is disposed of around our waterways.

"It's not just being aware of disposal of your own rubbish but also removing rubbish you may see in the water when you are out there," she said.

Although Pygmy Right Whales have been recorded around Tasmanian waters previously, they are a cryptic species and are the least known of all the baleen whales.

While rarely seen at sea generally, the species is found in temperate and sub-Antarctic waters, but as they are usually found further offshore it makes studying them much more difficult.

Dr Beasley said scientists took biological samples from this whale to increase knowledge of the species.


Read more!

Piracy in the Malacca Straits: Southeast Asia winning the battle

Southeast Asia winning Malacca Straits battle for now, says watchdog
Channel NewsAsia 20 Nov 08;

JAKARTA : Southeast Asia is winning the battle against piracy in the Malacca Straits but any reduction in vigilance could see a sudden return of high-seas banditry in the vital trade lane, a watchdog said Thursday.

The strategic shipping route between Indonesia's Sumatra island and the Southeast Asian peninsula of Malaysia and Singapore was deemed the most dangerous waterway in the world by Lloyds of London only three years ago.

But attacks are dramatically down thanks to better cooperation among the littoral states which surround the narrow waterway, and experts believe a major hijacking like the incident off Somalia this week is now unlikely here.

In the year to September there have been only two pirate attacks in the straits, according to the Malaysia-based International Maritime Bureau (IMB), compared to 38 in 2004 and a peak of 75 in 2000.

"If pirates here were to try a copy-cat attack like in Somalia, it won't be easy for them because the governments in this region won't hesitate to take action," IMB Piracy Reporting Centre chief Noel Choong said.

But he said pirates operating out of bases in Sumatra and outlying islands would strike again as soon as the littoral states relaxed their coordinated "aggressive patrols."

"What we see is that the pirates aren't being detained, they're just lying low because of the aggressive patrols... We maintain our piracy warning for the Malacca Straits despite the stability of the region."

The Malacca sea-lane carries about 40 percent of the world's trade, including a major part of the energy imports of China and Japan.

But unlike the pirate-infested Gulf of Aden off the coast of lawless Somalia, the littoral states have relatively well-organised maritime police forces and navies with backing from allies like the United States.

US aid for Indonesia's anti-piracy efforts includes 15 high-speed response boats, some of which are based at Batam opposite Singapore at the most vulnerable choke-point in the straits.

Washington is also funding a tactical communications centre in Jakarta and a major radar system along the north Sumatran coast to better monitor suspect vessels.

Both pirate attacks this year -- one on February 1 off the Indonesian town Medan and another on May 10 off the northern coast of Sumatra -- involved pirates trying but failing to board huge tankers.

In the May attack, pirates in military camouflage gear used a bamboo pole attached to a hook to try to gain access to the ship while it was under way. They fled in a speedboat after the ship's captain raised the alarm.

There have been numerous other incidents in the straits in 2008 but they were considered too close to ports and anchorages to fit the definition of piracy, according to the IMB.

"Our Straits of Malacca is under good surveillance," said Malaysian defence ministry spokeswoman Fadzlette Merican.

"Whatever irregularities we see, we will report. We feel this is why piracy cases have reduced significantly... We are always on the alert."

Maritime Institue of Malaysia security analyst Ramli Nik said the clear lesson to be learnt from the effort to secure the Malacca Straits is the importance of the "comprehensive partnership" between Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia.

"This is key in combating piracy," he said.

But it is a lesson that may not apply to Somalia, which has no effective government to cooperate with -- and a much larger expanse of water for international vessels to patrol.

"In Somalia there is no proper government and there is no joint co-operation between the states surrounding the Gulf of Aden. These countries are also incapable of securing the waters due to the lack of resources," he said.

Associate Professor Ralf Emmers, a specialist in maritime security at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, said piracy was an economic crime and few places on earth were as desperately poor as Somalia.

"It's important to remember that piracy is related to socioeconomics... and this partly explains why you see such an increase off the coast of Somalia now," he said.

- AFP/vm

Malaysia, Indonesia urged to open up waters
Jessinta Tan, Today Online 21 Nov 08;
with additional reporting by AFP


MALAYSIA and Indonesia “lack the will” to further open up their waters for Singapore to help patrol their sea routes, despite the two countries’ lack of resources to do so, observed a maritime expert.

“Singapore can help them to do the job of patrolling if they open up their waters,” said Singapore’s LTC Joshua Ho, a senior fellow at S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore — the three littoral countries — have conducted coordinated patrols in the Strait of Malacca. Singapore also contributes boats and provides maritime training to the two countries.

But Mohd Nizam Basiron, a research fellow at the Maritime Institute of Malaysia, said it is a challenge to balance one’s interests with those of the international community, amid increasing competition over the control of sea lines of communication, and threats to maritime security.

“Malaysia’s maritime security environment is a complex and convoluted mix of national and bilateral issues layered against the interests of the world’s powers,” he said, referring to the United States, China and India.

Mr Mohd Nizam said Malaysia faces a dilemma in reconciling these interests.

Meanwhile, Malaysia-based International Maritime Bureau (IMB) said Southeast Asia is winning the battle against piracy in the Strait of Malacca, but any reduction in vigilance could see a sudden return of high-seas banditry in the vital trade lane.

Attacks are dramatically down, thanks to better cooperation among the littoral states.

“If pirates here were to try a copy-cat attack like in Somalia, it won’t be easy for them because the governments in this region won’t hesitate to take action,” IMB Piracy Reporting Centre chief Noel Choong said.

But pirates operating out of bases in Sumatra and outlying islands would strike again as soon as the littoral states relaxed their coordinated “aggressive patrols”.

“What we see is that the pirates aren’t being detained, they’re just lying low because of the aggressive patrols. We maintain our piracy warning for the Malacca Strait despite the stability of the region.”

On maritime terrorism, LTC Ho said groups such as Jemaah Islamiyah and Abu Sayyaf have the intention and capability to launch attacks at sea, although the likelihood of that happening is low at present.

Hijackings at sea: How Southeast Asia overcame scourge
Michael Richardson, Straits Times 21 Nov 08;

THE seizure this week by Somalian pirates of a giant Saudi-owned tanker in the Indian Ocean has shocked the world's merchant shipping industry and navies. The 318,000-ton Sirius Star, fully laden with oil, is the biggest tanker ever to be hijacked at sea.

Could a similar seizure happen in South-east Asian waters, where pirates have also been active in recent years? Mr Noel Choong, head of the shipping industry's Piracy Reporting Centre in Kuala Lumpur, believes it will be 'very difficult to copycat the Somalia situation in Asia'. Asian governments, he points out, are committed to suppressing both piracy and terrorism and have more resources to do so than Somalia, a failed state that has not had an effective government since 1991. The regional piracy-monitoring agency in Singapore says maritime attacks in Asia in the first nine months of this year dropped 11 per cent compared to last year, and 32 per cent from 2006. Most of the attacks nowadays are small-scale robberies against small vessels.

Yet, three years ago in the Malacca and Singapore straits, something akin to the attack on the Sirius Star was attempted. On April 6, 2005, a 150,000-ton Japanese tanker reported an attempted boarding by suspected pirates as the vessel neared Singapore.

In the midst of a heavy rainstorm and poor visibility, the captain of the Yohteisan sent out a radio message that he had been surrounded by seven small craft and that people from them had tried to board the tanker. They were prevented from doing so only when the captain increased speed.

Singapore's Ministry of Defence (Mindef) was so concerned about the incident that it issued a statement describing the sequence of events. As soon as the Yohteisan's distress call was received, the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore alerted the Navy and Police Coast Guard and broadcast an anti-piracy warning to vessels in the region. The attempted boarding, however, occurred in Indonesian territory. The east-bound lane of the traffic separation scheme to keep ships from colliding in the narrow Singapore Strait is in Indonesian, not Singapore, waters. All the Singapore Navy could do was to inform the Indonesian Navy, which then sent raider boats to the scene to investigate. A Singapore naval ship was also deployed on the Singapore side of the channel to render assistance if required.

A Mindef statement said: 'These incidents highlight the need to find more ways by which enforcement agencies can cooperate to take action to enhance the security of regional waters, while respecting the sovereignty of the littoral states.'

Singapore's concern was well-founded. 2005 was the year when the insurer Lloyds of London listed the busy Malacca and Singapore straits - the shortest way by sea between the Indian and Pacific oceans - as a danger spot for piracy, prompting some insurers to raise premiums for ships using the channel. Indonesia was regarded as the main problem area.

In 2004, the shipping industry reported 93 attacks on ships in Indonesian waters, more than a quarter of the global tally. Another 37 attacks took place in the Malacca and Singapore straits. As in Somalia, the pirates were becoming bolder and better armed. Automatic assault rifles were being used more frequently and even some rocket-propelled grenades were reportedly brandished. The hijacking of vessels was on the rise, and so was the kidnapping of their officers and crew for ransom.

Singapore Deputy Prime Minister S. Jayakumar said at the time that hijacking vessels for their valuable cargo and taking crew for ransom 'suggest that organised elements are creeping into what was previously the domain of opportunistic thuggery. Piracy has become a high-tech international enterprise'.

How did South-east Asia turn this dire situation around? The key was the arrest and punishment of pirates and organisers by Indonesia and Malaysia, and the settlement of the separatist conflict in Aceh. Maritime-related aid to Indonesia, especially from the United States, Japan and China, also helped. Singapore provided real-time surveillance information to Indonesia on shipping traffic. And both countries combined with Malaysia to intensify sea and air patrolling of the straits.

Still, the seizure of the Sirius Star shows that it is relatively easy for armed raiders to take control of even the biggest merchant ships. The risk is that terrorists may try to emulate the pirates, but use giant ships with flammable or polluting cargoes as political weapons, instead of as bargaining chips for ransom, as the Somalian pirates do.

The writer is an energy and security specialist at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.


Read more!

Leading entrepreneurs in Singapore view climate change as growing strategic concern

Channel NewsAsia 20 Nov 08;

SINGAPORE: Six in 10 leading entrepreneurs view climate change as a growing strategic concern, according to a survey by Ernst & Young.

The poll also found that 70 per cent of entrepreneurs have increased their focus on climate change initiatives over the past 12 to 24 months.

In line with broader corporate trends, 80 per cent of them expect to increase their cleantech spending over the next five years. These are to improve their internal operations and supply chain and to meet their corporate responsibility requirements.

44 per cent have budgeted at least US$1 million for climate change investments over the next five years. About six per cent of those surveyed anticipate spending upwards of US$20 million over a five-year period.

The poll said investment in cleantech are likely to be in the areas of water efficiency, solar power and electric grid management.

Ernst & Young said entrepreneurs are recognising that responding to climate change can lead to strategic opportunities to enhance their market position or create efficiencies.

Nearly seven in 10 cited the opportunity to enhance competitive position as an important strategic driver. But there are risks, such as the cost of energy and other resources.

Just over a quarter of respondents also said regulatory uncertainty is the single greatest challenge in responding effectively to climate change.

In terms of financial return, about 70 per cent said their response to climate change would have a positive or neutral impact on the bottom line over the next 10 years.

The survey polled leading entrepreneurs from Ernst & Young's World Entrepreneur of the Year Academy. - CNA/vm


Read more!

Tree planting takes root in Singapore

Up to 60,000 trees are planted each year by NParks under various community schemes
Grace Chua, Straits Times 21 Nov 08;

A WAVE of tree planting is sweeping across Singapore as everyone, from schoolchildren to MPs, pitches in to combat climate change and environmental degradation.

About 50,000 to 60,000 trees are planted each year by the National Parks Board (NParks) under various community schemes, a number that has been rising steadily since Singapore launched a drive four decades ago to cover the island in green.

Last Saturday, local firm ST Engineering set a national record by planting 2,008 trees in Admiralty Park.

Meanwhile, annual tree-planting days have been held by communities islandwide this month.

At a Jalan Besar GRC tree-planting day last week, Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Lee Boon Yang remarked: 'We must have planted more than a million trees over the years.'

In fact, 1.3 million trees, from angsanas to tembusus, have been planted since 1967 when Singapore launched the Garden City programme to cover the island with greenery.

The push sprung from the idea that tree-planting has environmental benefits on both the global and local levels. Trees take in carbon dioxide from the air, sucking up tonnes of the compound that causes global warming.

Shade from rooftop gardens is also estimated to lower local ambient temperatures by up to 4 deg C. Roadside trees also filter soot from traffic exhaust.

The push to green Singapore has been proven to be successful. The land area covered by greenery increased from 36 per cent in 1987 to 47 per cent last year, despite the fact that the population nearly doubled in the same period.

The Government's first tree-planting campaign, in 1963, hoped to yield just over 10,000 trees.

The campaign was launched as Singapore's early development had seen many trees cut down for buildings and plantations.

Even in the 1950s, the business district remained treeless.

Mr Simon Longman, NParks' director of streetscape, arrived in Singapore in the early 1980s to find the roadside vegetation still 'patchy'.

'Some roads, such as East Coast Parkway, were planted well, but on others the trees were not so pervasive,' he said.

Early in the Garden City campaign, Mr Longman explained, relatively fast-growing trees such as angsanas, raintrees and yellow flames were used. These flowered a few years after planting, and took about 25 years to grow to full height.

In the mid-80s and 90s, flowering trees such as the trumpet tree (Tabebuia rosea), with its pink flowers, were planted to add colour to the landscape.

Today, there is an effort to increase biodiversity among trees here, by planting a wide variety of South-east Asian species such as the sea gutta (Pouteria obovata) and the pong-pong (Cerbera odollam), from which the Katong neighbourhood got its name.

Planting a tree can cost between $50 and $200.


Read more!

Bush attacked over wildlife plan

BBC News 20 Nov 08;

US environmentalists have accused President George W Bush of trying to rush through changes to the Endangered Species Act in his last days in office.

They say the changes could take away protection for animals and plants facing possible extinction.

The Bush administration wants to make it easier for drilling, mining and major construction projects to go ahead without a full scientific assessment.

Under current rules, the impact of such projects must be assessed by experts.

The changes proposed by the Bush administration would let federal agencies make the decisions without a full scientific assessment as to the likely impact on the environment.

Republican supporters of the changes, along with developers and some federal agencies, argue that the current system of environmental reviews causes delays to projects, pushing up costs.

The White House denies that the late spate of rule changes is politically motivated.

Legal challenge

However, a spokesman for Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House of Representatives would be looking at ways to overturn the "one-minute-to-midnight" rules.

"The House... will review what oversight tools are at our disposal regarding this and other last-minute attempts to inflict severe damage to the law in the waning moments of the Bush administration," said spokesman Drew Hammill.

Mr Bush has until Friday to publish the new rules. Most regulations take effect 60 days after publication, and Mr Bush wants them in place before he leaves the White House.

This will make it harder for president-elect Barack Obama to undo them when he takes office on 20 January 2009.

Mr Obama's chief of transition, John Podesta, has said the incoming president will review the last-minute actions, and seek to repeal those that are "not in the interests of the country".

The BBC's Jonathan Beale in Washington says that if Mr Bush presses ahead, environmental groups and some states are almost certain to challenge the decision in the courts.

Mr Bush has already been criticised by environmentalists for adding fewer than 10 species of plant and animals a year to the endangered list.

That contrasts with former President Bill Clinton, who added an average of 65 species a year.

George W Bush may lift protections on endangered animals and plants
Animals and plants in danger of extinction could lose the protection of government experts who make sure that infrastructure projects don't pose a threat, under regulations outgoing US president George W Bush is set to put in place before he leaves office.
Alex Spillius, The Telegraph 20 Nov 08;

The rules must be published on Friday to take effect before President-Elect Barack Obama is sworn in Jan 20.

The proposed change would eliminate the input of federal wildlife scientists in some endangered species cases, allowing the federal agency in charge of building, authorising or funding a project to determine for itself if it is likely to harm endangered wildlife and plants.

Current regulations require independent wildlife biologists to sign off on these decisions before a project can go forward, at times modifying the design to better protect species.

It is among several rule changes that environmentalists say Mr Bush has or will introduce in what are known as "midnight regulations".

Though he would not be the first president to follow the practice, environmental campaigners fear he will sneak through as many changes as possible on energy, climate change and the environment, having been unable to pass full legislation through the Democrat-controlled Congress.

He has already opened up 800,000 hectares of land in Rocky Mountain states for the development of oil shale, and is reportedly considering allowing industrial-size pig, cow and chicken farms to disregard the Clean Water Act and air pollution controls.

Rules that go into effect before Mr Obama takes office will be difficult to overturn since it would require the new administration to restart the rule-making process.

Democratic Congressmen are however already plotting to reverse any new Bush regulations through the use of an obscure act allows review of new federal regulations, which has been used once in the last 12 years.

Bush angers environmentalists with last-minute rule changes
Many of the 'midnight regulations' open wilderness for oil and gas drilling, and loosen environmental safeguards. President Bush has pushed 53 through in three weeks, researchers say.
Jim Tankersley, LA Times 21 Nov 08;

Reporting from Washington -- As the hour grows late, President Bush, like many chief executives before him, seems to hear the call of the wild.

Honoring a tradition that dates at least to the Reagan administration, Bush is pushing through a bundle of controversial last-minute changes in federal rules -- many of them involving the environment, national parks and public lands in the West.

President Clinton used his final weeks and months in office to strengthen a host of environmental rules and lock up federal lands with wilderness and other protective designations. Bush is using the same window of opportunity to open wilderness for oil and gas drilling, and to loosen safeguards for air, water and wildlife.

In recent days, the Bush administration announced new rules to speed oil shale development across 2 million rocky acres in the West. It scheduled an auction for drilling rights alongside three national parks. It has also set in motion processes to finalize major changes in endangered species protection, allow more mining waste to flow into rivers and streams, and exempt factory farms from air pollution reporting.

Researchers who track "midnight regulations" say Bush pushed 53 of them through the federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the last three weeks, nearly double the pace of Clinton at this point in his final year.

Some of the most controversial rules deal with the environment -- a legacy-cementing area where Bush diverges sharply from Clinton and from President-elect Barack Obama.

In the mid-1990s, when Clinton was in the White House, the GOP-controlled Congress established rules designed to rein in late-inning regulatory changes. But the move has had little effect.

Outgoing presidents "have an incentive to push stuff that the next administration won't be in favor of," said Veronique de Rugy, a senior fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University who tracks midnight regulations. "It's your last chance . . . to extend your influence into the future."

White House officials say they've taken pains to avoid a late-term blitz. Spokesman Tony Fratto said that Bush is keeping roughly the same regulatory pace as last year, and that many rules won't be enacted because agencies missed a Nov. 1 deadline for final action, set earlier this year by Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten. Bolten's order allows exceptions for what are considered extraordinary circumstances.

"It's unprecedented in the history of administrations to try to do something this way, and do it the right way," Fratto said.

Environmental activists and government watchdogs, on the other hand, say Bush rushed several of the rules to completion so that Obama could not easily overturn them.

Obama can summarily reverse anything not enacted by the time he takes office, a lesson Bush learned by blocking several of Clinton's last-ditch environmental measures, such as a ban on road-building in national forests.

"The Bush administration is trying to prevent Obama from doing to it what it did to Clinton," said Matt Madia, a regulatory policy analyst for OMB Watch, a Washington-based watchdog group.

Under federal rules, it takes 60 days to enact an economically "significant" regulation, which carries an estimated impact of $100 million or more. Other regulations take 30 days. Today is the deadline for "significant" regulation, though Fratto calls it "irrelevant to our process."

The process moved especially quickly in the case of oil shale. In July, the administration proposed rules that would eventually lead to leasing 2 million acres of public land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming for oil shale extraction, even though serious questions remain about how much power and water -- a particularly scarce resource on much of that land -- would be needed to make it work.

The rules were finalized this week.

The American Petroleum Institute praised the move as "an integral step" toward increased domestic energy production. "It lays the groundwork, lets investors know what they're going to face going forward," said Andy Radford, a senior policy advisor for the institute.

Environmentalists cried foul. Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) said Bush had "fallen into the trap of allowing political timelines to trump sound policy."

Activists also accuse Bush of disregarding public comments on a proposal to change how the Endangered Species Act guides federal projects. Currently, federal agencies must check with government species experts before building a dam or paving a road.

Bush would allow the agencies to determine on their own if they were putting protected species in danger. The change would be "absolutely necessary if we're going to move projects forward," said William Kovacs, vice president of environment, technology and regulatory affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Opponents say administration officials breezed through 250,000 public comments -- most of them criticizing the proposal -- in less than a week. "They've clearly made a predetermined decision to issue it no matter what the public comments say, which is not what we're supposed to do in this country," said Andrew Wetzler, director of the endangered species project at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The NRDC, the Sierra Club and other groups also oppose several rules not subject to the deadline and likely to be enacted soon, including eased restrictions on mountaintop mining near streams, reduced pollution reporting for large farms and weakened air quality controls near national parks.

If those rules are approved, Obama would need to initiate a potentially cumbersome process to revise them.

"They wouldn't be able to just put out a notice and just overturn them the next day," said Karla Raettig, the legislative representative for wildlife conservation for the National Wildlife Federation. A little-used law from the 1990s might allow Congress to overturn many of the regulations.

Tankersley writes for our Washington bureau.


Read more!

Malaria and Dengue the Sting in Climate Change

Michael Perry, PlanetArk 21 Nov 08;

SYDNEY - Southeast Asia and South Pacific island nations face a growing threat from malaria and dengue fever as climate change spreads mosquitoes that carry the diseases and climate-change refugees start to migrate.

A new report titled "The Sting of Climate Change," said recent data suggested that since the 1970s climate change had contributed to 150,000 more deaths every year from disease, with over half of the deaths in Asia.

"Projections of the impact of climate change on malaria and dengue are truly eye-opening," said the Lowy Institute report released in Sydney on Thursday.

According to the World Health Organization, rising temperatures and higher rainfall caused by climate change will see the number of mosquitoes increasing in cooler areas where there is little resistance or knowledge of the diseases they carry.

The Lowy report said early modeling predicted malaria prevalence could be 1.8 to 4.8 times greater in 2050 than 1990. The share of the world's population living in malaria-endemic zones could also grow from 45 percent to 60 percent by the end of the century.

By 2085, an estimated 52 percent of the world's population, or about 5.2 billion people, will be living in areas at risk of dengue.

It also said diseases will spread once climate change forces people to flee their homes, such as low-lying islands or coastal land swamped by rising sea levels.

For example, in the Pacific nation of Tuvalu, a ring of nine Polynesian islands, several thousand people have already left for New Zealand to restart their lives because of rising seas.

"The number of environmental refugees as a whole may reach 50 million by 2010, with small, low-lying island populations at the greatest risk. Displaced people from lowland areas could well provide the human reservoir for the spread of malaria and dengue," said the report.

"Global climate change will intensify the already significant malaria and dengue problems in maritime Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands," said the report.

"Those countries with the fewest resources and poor public health infrastructure are likely to feel the impact of increasing disease the most acutely," said the report.

Up to half a billion new cases of malaria and as many as two million deaths, mostly children, are recorded each year. There are an estimated 50-100 million cases of dengue fever annually and approximately 25,000 deaths.
MAJOR HEALTH PROBLEM Malaria is a major health problem for Indonesia, East Timor, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu.

Indonesia had an estimated 6 million to 15 million registered malaria cases in 2005 and it is estimated that almost half of its population of over 225 million people will eventually be at risk from malaria due to climate change, said the Lowy report.

Australia, free of malaria and dengue fever, is also at risk because it is a "fringe country" to the expanding endemic zone of mosquito-borne diseases to its north, said the report.

"Mosquitoes are very sensitive to changes in climate. Warmer conditions allow the mosquitoes and the malaria parasite itself to develop and grow more quickly, while wetter conditions let mosquitoes live longer and breed more prolifically," it said.

"The sting of climate change is an international public health crisis being felt on Australia's tropical doorstep. It may soon be pressing on Australia's northern shores as well."

Climate change also threatens to increase the spread of dengue fever. The South Pacific's scattered island nations of Samoa, Tonga, New Caledonia, Kiribati, New Caledonia and Palau are currently struggling with an endemic of dengue, with more than 2,000 cases so far recorded in 2008.

Modeling showed that dengue fever could increase by 20 to 30 percent in Fiji due to climate, said the Lowy report.

(Editing by Valerie Lee)


Read more!

Climate change may be causing disease outbreaks in Philippines

Yahoo News 20 Nov 08;

MANILA (AFP) – Global warming may have contributed to a recent spate of outbreaks of deadly diseases in the Philippines, a senior minister said Thursday.

"Clearly what was predicted about the impact of global warming is already happening," Health Secretary Francisco Duque told reporters.

"The temperature is increasing leading to more diseases.

"There's going to be propensity for more cholera, dengue, typhoid and malaria," he warned.

Duque added that the diseases are all "manageable" as long as people practise proper hygiene and sanitation and those afflicted are swiftly brought to hospitals for immediate treatment.

The Philippine Red Cross meanwhile confirmed Thursday that three people had died and 2,235 others had been treated in three towns in the southern province of Misamis Oriental for an outbreak of gastroenteritis.

The Philippine Health Department had earlier said the outbreak was believed to be cholera but the Red Cross said tests showed it was gastroenteritis.

Both illnesses have similar symptoms and are spread through contaminated drinking water.

Doctor Eric Tayag, head of the government's National Epidemiology Centre, also confirmed that a typhoid outbreak had hit Real town, northeast of Manila, affecting 109 people. However there have been no deaths from typhoid so far.

Global warming 'will cause malaria epidemic in Australia and Pacific Islands'
Australia and the Pacific Islands are facing epidemics of malaria and dengue fever because of global warming, a report has claimed.
Bonnie Malkin, The Telegraph 20 Nov 08;

The tropical diseases will spread south from south east Asia as climate change allows mosquitoes to travel to parts of the world that used to be too cold for them to survive.

Australia has been malaria-free since 1962, but research by Lowy Institute, a Sydney-based think tank, estimates that due to rising temperatures, malaria could spread as far south as Gladstone on the mid-Queensland coast. It said outbreaks of dengue fever could reach Rockhampton, 100 kilometres further north.

Malaria kills two million people, mostly children, worldwide each year.

Dengue fever is also deadly, causing an estimated 50 to 100 million cases annually and approximately 25,000 deaths. Experts agree that this number is rising every year.

The report, The Sting of Climate Change: Malaria and Dengue Fever in Maritime Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands, predicts that in countries where the mosquito-borne diseases are already present, the situation will worsen as temperatures climb.

"Mosquitoes are very sensitive to changes in climate. Warmer conditions allow the mosquitoes and the malaria parasite itself to develop and grow more quickly, while wetter conditions let mosquitoes live longer and breed more prolifically," it said.

"The sting of climate change is an international public health crisis being felt on Australia's tropical doorstep. It may soon be pressing on Australia's northern shores as well."

Malaria is already a problem in Papua New Guinea's lowlands, but the research suggests that as the world warms up mosquitoes will be able to travel into the country's western highlands, affecting up to another two million people live.

In Fiji, it estimates climate change could also increase the incidence of dengue fever by up to 30 per cent.

The report's author, Dr Sarah Potter, has called on the Australian government to spend money modelling the spread of malaria and dengue fever and tighten quarantine and screening processes of visitors to northern Australia.


Read more!

Global Warming Could Lead To More Arctic Energy

David Brunnstrom, PlanetArk 21 Nov 08;

BRUSSELS - The Arctic offers new energy and fishing resources as a result of global warming and new technology, the European Union said on Thursday.

Melting ice also presented new navigation possibilities such as a short route to the Pacific Ocean, the EU executive said.

The rapid recession of sea ice, snow cover and permafrost were helping to accelerate global warming and the loss from the Greenland ice sheet would bring a swift rise in sea levels, it said in a paper.

States should develop a coordinated approach to the Arctic to ensure the EU was well placed to take advantage and to help minimize the damage from increased human activity, it said.

The EU should work particularly with Russia and Norway to facilitate environmentally friendly energy exploitation.

"The Arctic contains large untapped hydrocarbon reserves," it said. "Arctic resources could contribute to enhancing the EU's security of supply concerning energy and raw materials in general."

The EU must keep its edge in sustainable energy exploitation and encourage research and innovation to facilitate oil and gas exploration in harsher climates and deeper waters, while insisting on full respect for environmental standards, it said.

Melting of sea ice would open new navigation routes and could considerably shorten sea trips from Europe to the Pacific as well opening new fishing areas, the paper said. Explorers had for centuries searched for such a route.

On fisheries, it called for establishment of a regulatory framework for Arctic high seas not yet covered by international conservation regimes before new fishing opportunities arose.

"Until a conservation and management regime is in place for the areas not yet covered by such a regime, no new fisheries should commence," it said.

Three EU states -- Denmark through Greenland, Finland and Sweden -- have Arctic territories, while non-EU states Iceland and Norway are part of the European Economic Area.

A report released in September by the European Environment Agency, the World Health Organization and the European Commission found the minimum surface area of Arctic sea ice was only half the normal minimum measured in the 1950s.

It said the sea level rise could place 4 million Europeans at risk of flooding by 2100 along with 2 trillion euros ($2.9 trillion) of assets, from London to Athens.

(Reporting by David Brunnstrom; Editing by Angus MacSwan)


Read more!