Wood industry in Riau on brink of collapse

Rizal Harahap, The Jakarta Post 28 Feb 08;

The wood processing industry in Riau, including sawmills and molding firms, is on the brink of collapse due to a scarcity of raw material supplies, said the head of Riau's Indonesian Wood Community (MPI), Hotman Butar-Butar.

Hotman said on Wednesday that wood supplies were falling because many forest concession holders were involved in rampant illegal logging practices in the province.

"The (illegal logging) cases involving a number of forest concession holders are being investigated by the Riau Police," he said.

"There is no clear information as to when the investigation will be completed. The problem is that we depend heavily on them."

Hotman said nearly half of the 150 sawmills registered at MPI had stopped operations and "similar hardships" were affecting 35 registered molding firms in the province.

Nearly 30 percent of 35,000 workers employed at the wood processing industry had been laid off, he said.

"If the log scarcity prevails until next month, more companies will go bankrupt and thousands of other workers will be jobless."

Hotman further said since January 2007 the Riau Police had frozen some 175,000 hectares of forests owned by 18 forest concessionaires.

He said the "problematic causes" that led to the forests being frozen included the extension of logging licenses, annual working plans and unlicensed machinery.

Jhony Setiawan Mundung, head of the Riau office of the Forum for the Indonesian Environment (Walhi), said he deplored the slow pace at which police investigations took place around illegal logging cases.

He rejected an opinion which said freezing forest concessions would cause an increase in unemployment in the sector.

"It was just disclosed by a man who is in need of wood in a large quantity," Mundung said.

A report by WWF conservation group released Wednesday said that Riau province had lost 65 percent of its forests in the past 25 years as companies used the land for pulpwood and palm oil plantation.

Indonesia has one of the highest rates of deforestation in the world, driven by voracious demand for commodities and weak law enforcement.

Emissions from deforestation, and in particular peatland -- which is made up of deep layers of semi-decomposed vegetation -- have made Indonesia the world's third-largest carbon emitter, behind the United States and China.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 28 Feb 08


International Year of the Frog 2008
funky frogs and why they are important on the leafmonkey blog with lots of froggy links; also on the budak blog.

Pacific Reef Egret
a black one spotted on the bird ecology blog

Plants and Espionage
a common plant with an uncommon use on the garden voices blog

Tamarind
the sweet and sour of it on the budak blog

Announcing David Bickford’s new webpage!
on The Biodiversity crew @ NUS blog

The bird and the spider
strange behaviour on the urban forest blog

Dancing crabs
on the urban forest blog


Read more!

SPCA requests AVA to restrict import, breeding, sale of pedigree dogs

Channel NewsAsia 27 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) wrote to the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) last week to call for tighter restrictions on the import, breeding and sale of pedigree dogs.

Last year alone, the SPCA took in some 3,000 unwanted dogs, and more than half of them were pedigree dogs.

In its reply, AVA said it would not be appropriate to restrict the number and type of dogs imported, bred and sold. It, however, has to approve the type and number of dogs pet shops can sell.

It also pointed out in its reply that since last September, AVA has introduced several measures to discourage abandonment of pet dogs, which include compulsory microchipping and the introduction of a differential fee for sterilised and unsterilised pet dogs. There are also tighter controls on breeding dogs on dog farms.

Last year, the AVA impounded 2050 dogs.

Deirdre Moss, executive officer of SPCA, said: "We definitely have a surplus. And you know we are limited in the number of homes that can be found also. We have 250 dogs coming in every month, of which half are pedigree, and we have got 30 to 35 homes to adopt them."

SPCA figures indicated that the number of lost or unwanted pedigree dogs rose from 30 to 50 per cent over the past two years, and the most common reason cited when dogs are given to the society is that the owners have no time to look after them. - CNA/ac

1,521 pedigree dogs dumped
Carolyn Quek and April Chong, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

SINGAPOREANS are dumping their pedigree dogs, once prized for their rarity, at an 'alarming' rate, according to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA).

More than half of the 3,002 unwanted dogs the society took in last year, or 1,521 animals, were purebreds.

According to the society's executive officer Deirdre Moss, purebreds made up a quarter of the unwanted dog population in the 1980s and grew to almost one-third in the 1990s.

The increase comes as more owners import pedigrees from outside the country.

Leading the pack of breeds that showed up at the society last year were golden retrievers and Jack Russell terriers.

The pedigree dogs the SPCA sees now are younger than before, with most being one to four years old, she said.

Not having the time to look after their pet was the most common reason owners cited for surrendering the animals, the SPCA said.

To curb the the increasing numbers of pedigree dogs being imported, bred and sold here, the SPCA had suggested that the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) restrict their supply.

But the AVA, in a response to the society, said it 'would not be appropriate' to restrict the number and type of dogs.

'We understand the SPCA's concerns but would like to reiterate that Singapore operates on a free market system,' said AVA's head of the centre for animal welfare and control, Mr Madhavan Kannan.

The SPCA warns against impulse pet purchases and urges potential pet owners to carefully consider the implications of dog ownership.

More abandon pedigree dogs
As number rises to alarming levels, SPCA calls for action
Leong Wee Keat, Today Online 28 Feb 08;

AS THE number of abandoned pedigree dogs shot up alarmingly last year, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) has urged the authorities to tighten the import, commercial breeding and sale of such dogs.

Three years ago, about one in four lost and unwanted dogs was a purebred. This number rose to "alarming levels" last year, with one in two unwanted dogs a pedigreed. Overall, the SPCA received an average of 250 lost or unwanted dogs each month last year.

The trend shows no signs of abating. Last month, the SPCA received 125 lost and unwanted pedigreed dogs alone. Some reasons cited by owners giving up their canines included leaving the country, moving house, expecting a child and — a frequent excuse — no time to look after it.

In light of this, SPCA has written in to the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) asking for curbs to be placed on the import and commercial breeding or sale of pedigree dogs.

"It's time to take stock of the number being bred, sold and imported annually and to see if there are enough homes for them," SPCA executive officer Deirdre Moss told Today. "There is definitely a surplus (of pedigreed dogs) and too many people buying on the spur of the moment."

Another animal welfare group, Action for Singapore Dogs (ASD), supported SPCA's call. Over the last six months, ASD president Ricky Yeo said the society has seen a 20 to 30 per cent increase in pedigreed strays being picked up.

Even more worryingly, he notes, this trend means that the chances of rescued local mongrels being adopted have also eroded, as pedigreed dogs are seen as being "superior". At ASD, the adoption rate for pedigrees is on the rise, while that for mongrels has been slipping, said Mr Yeo.

An AVA spokesperson said the authority understands SPCA's concerns but reiterated that Singapore operates on "a free market system". He said: "It would not be appropriate to restrict the number and type of dogs imported or bred and sold commercially as long as the pet business is legal and complies with the regulations and applicable conditions."

With the revision of the Animals and Birds (Licensing and Control) Rule last September, the spokesperson said AVA has also introduced several measures — such as compulsory microchipping and introduction of a differential fee for sterilised and unsterilised pet dogs — to discourage abandonment. Tighter controls on breeding dog populations on dog farms were also put in place.

Ms Moss urged would-be owners to think long-term before getting a dog. "Dogs require a lot of attention, socialisation and training," she said. "Your part of the bargain also has to be fulfilled — you have to spend time with them and communicate with them. It is not unlike having a child."

Under the Animals and Birds Act, a person found guilty of abandonment of an animal could be fined up to $10,000 or jailed a year, or both.


Read more!

Needed: Greater ownership of environment

Straits Times Forum 28 Feb 08;

WE REFER to the letter, 'Singapore sadly lax over cleanliness now' (Feb 19). Over the years, educational efforts have been taken to make environmentally friendly practices, such as not littering, a part of our lives.

Indeed, the National Environment Agency's (NEA) surveys have shown that most people dispose of their litter in refuse bins. Sadly, the results also showed that a minority think that littering is acceptable. Singaporeans, therefore, need to have a greater sense of environmental ownership.

The NEA has been working with various partners to strengthen this sense of environmental ownership among Singaporeans. Working with kindergartens and childcare centres, it has developed creative teaching aids to help children learn about good personal habits, such as keeping the environment litter-free.

The NEA also works with the Ministry of Education to integrate environmental issues into the school curriculum. In addition, it has introduced Environment Champions and Litter-Free Ambassadors programmes to train students to promote the green message among their peers.

The NEA works with grassroots organisations, non-governmental organisations and youth groups to reinforce the anti-littering message. For example, it is working closely with the Environment Challenge Organisation (ECO) to urge participants of public events to keep public areas clean.

We will also act against the minority who litter.

The letter writer, Ms Maria Kleyman of the United States, lamented that cleanliness in the streets of Ang Mo Kio has declined since her last visit in 1988. Within the Ang Mo Kio estate, the Ang Mo Kio-Yio Chu Kang Town Council has been actively stepping up conservancy efforts.

The town council will continue to step up cleaning and constantly monitor and review the performance of its conservancy and cleaning contractors.

It will continue to promote environmental ownership and combat littering through advisories, posters and educational articles in our newsletters.

Ultimately, no one should take the present clean and green environment for granted, and everyone should be committed to adopting an environmentally friendly lifestyle.

S. Satish Appoo
Director, Environmental Health Department
National Environment Agency

Wan Chong Hock
Chief Executive Officer
Ang Mo Kio-Yio Chu Kang Town Council


Read more!

Singapore corporations increasingly finding green is profitable: PwC

Amit Roy Choudhary, Business Times 28 Feb 08;

WHILE today's business managers have become more environmentally conscious, easily measurable economic benefit is still the key driving force behind corporate green initiatives, both in Singapore and the rest of the world, according to a new study by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

The joint study by PwC and the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) looked at the green technology movement by exploring the key drivers for change; the effect green initiatives have on collaboration and innovation across the technology value-chain; green-oriented regulations; and opportunities for growth.

The study shows that 40 per cent of technology executives claim the green movement creates significant market opportunities for their companies, as evidenced by a noticeable increase in customer demand for green products and services.

Additionally, 60 per cent cite energy savings as one of the most important factors in their company's environmental decision-making process.

'The growing demand for environmental products and services could translate into one of the biggest new markets in recent memory,' says Greg Unsworth, PwC Singapore partner and Asia Pacific technology industry leader, told BizIT. 'Technology companies can exploit this opportunity to drive growth, but they must ensure their green initiatives are in line with their business strategy.'

He noted that given Singapore's status as a leading financial centre, companies based here cannot afford to ignore the issues arising around climate change and the international momentum towards environmental awareness.

Mr Unsworth said that apart from the broader social objective to reduce the impact of business on the environment, companies here need to be aware of potential consumer and investor backlash due to a perceived lack of green initiatives.

'The survey shows that nearly one-in-five companies in the technology sector already assess environmental policies and track records of their suppliers in making purchasing decisions, and this figure is expected to increase,' the PwC official noted.

He added that in future sound environmental policies may become a prerequisite to generate business in some instances. In a number of countries, for instance, government customers are increasingly mandated to purchase green where available.

Mr Unsworth also noted that while there has been a relatively light touch to date in Singapore regarding regulation, there will be an increasing interest in the experience of those countries that are introducing carbon taxes and other regulatory measures - 'many companies are moving now to be prepared for risk of potential future regulation'.

The survey showed that technology organisations are taking steps to safeguard themselves from stringent government legislation and regulations in the future by proactively imposing their own green-oriented controls.

'Twenty per cent of the survey respondents say their companies maintain a formal and widely distributed environmental policy,' Mr Unsworth noted.

He added that this figure will increase significantly over the next two years, jumping to 48 per cent. 'To further reduce the risk of government regulations, technology companies are implementing a range of other environmental processes such as auditing internal green practices, appointing senior executives to oversee green programmes, and creating a clearer linkage between green initiatives and performance,' he said.

Mr Unsworth noted that the measures that should be taken by individual companies in Singapore will vary, based on the nature of their business operations, scale and current initiatives in place. 'The current carbon footprint could be assessed and an understanding of the opportunities to either generate revenues or save costs should be explored.'

Specifically, Mr Unsworth suggests measures like IT infrastructure and server consolidation, exploring alternative energy sources and automated technologies that regulate energy consumption and increased use of video or Web conferencing to cut down on travel requirements.

The PwC official noted that as a small city state with little natural energy resources, Singapore is vulnerable to the impact of a volatile energy market. So the republic would do well to think of introducing innovative fiscal incentives to tackle climate change issues, he added.


Read more!

SM comments on IR, F1 as part of creating a new buzz for Singapore

When going for a buzz triggered an economic boom for Singapore ...
Today Online 28 Feb 08;

In an interview with the English-language newspaper, Korea Herald, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, who visited South Korea last week, spoke on the challenges facing the Singapore economy. Below are edited excerpts from the interview.

"If we can't attract investments into Singapore, then how do you create jobs? So the No 1 priority for him (Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong) would be economic growth.

"An example I can give will be our Integrated Resorts (IRs), which include casinos. That was a very tough decision for him to take, because morally, we were against casinos.

"So he had to decide, how do you grow the tourism sector? … The Ministry of Trade and Industry suggested that maybe we should go for casinos, as part of the IRs.

"Half the country was against it … The other half were quite practical … So there was a huge debate in the country. In the end, he had to decide and he decided: 'Let's find ways to cope with the evils of casinos, and let's try and maximise the benefits'.

"I cite this as an example of how he has to take decisions to restructure the economy … And when he took this decision, the people — meaning investors and businessmen — were triggered by Singapore's boldness and pragmatism.

"And that triggered a boom in construction — because when you have these two big IRs, the construction industry took off … Financial services also boomed. So that decision caused us to grow by a huge 7.7 per cent last year.

"So there was a new buzz, a new excitement in Singapore — and then we said, well, from there what do we do? 'F1', somebody suggested — let's host Formula One. A city race, a night race. So we got excited — a night race within the city, but it's expensive … Again some people got unhappy, and he's got to decide.

"Then we were able to attract the Volvo Open — this is the sea race. Then we bidded for the 2010 Youth Olympic Games — again very expensive … If Singapore could succeed in hosting the first Youth Olympics, we'd get a lot of media attention … So, these are the decisions which he took to revitalise the economy and give it a new boost."


Read more!

Singapore growth plan not a 'grow-at-all-costs' policy

Alvin Foo, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

THE Government's economic expansion strategy is the right one and not a 'grow-at-all-costs' policy leading to an overheated economy as suggested by Mr Inderjit Singh (Ang Mo Kio GRC) on Monday.

Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said yesterday that while Mr Singh's speech made for 'very entertaining listening, it was in fact Inderjit's analysis that is flawed'.

Mr Tharman said: 'The Government has not pursued a 'grow-at-all-costs policy' as (he) suggested.

'We 'went for growth' not by over-stimulating the economy with fiscal spending, but by making Singapore more competitive by building up our capabilities, keeping taxes competitive and investing in infrastructure.'

Mr Singh told Parliament on Monday that the Government's strategy of growing the economy as fast as possible in good years was partly to blame for rapidly rising costs.

Responding yesterday, Mr Tharman said that Singapore needs to capitalise on the boom years to offset the bad ones to ensure healthy long-term growth.

'We have to take advantage of the opportunities when external conditions are favourable, so that the good years can offset the down years when the global cycle turns.'

The economy was able to grow at an average of 5 per cent over the past 10 years because it had grown rapidly in the last four years by about 8 per cent on average, he noted.

Mr Tharman said Singapore should seize the economic opportunities and not turn away big investors to avoid rapid growth.

He said: 'When they are ready to invest, and we say no, they go elsewhere. If we miss them, we miss the whole cycle. And we lose not just one investment. We lose the whole cluster.'

Many MPs, including Mr Singh, Ms Jessica Tan (East Coast GRC), Mr Michael Palmer (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) and Ms Penny Low (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC), have expressed concern that the Budget did not do enough for businesses facing rising costs.

Mr Tharman said although costs have increased, so has the overall demand for goods and services.

The Government's approach is to provide the conditions for companies to grow over the long term.

'We will help our companies to move up the value chain so that they are more competitive in a higher cost environment,' said Mr Tharman, who added that short-term bottlenecks affecting labour and space are being addressed.

For example, the Ministry of Manpower raised the quota for skilled foreign workers from 15 per cent to 25 per cent last month.

The Budget also contained measures to deal with the temporary shortages in office space, he said.

The Ministry of Trade and Industry has also been conducting an orderly release of industrial land which should relieve pressure on rents.

Mr Tharman also rejected suggestions from two MPs - Mr Singh and Ms Tan - to offer businesses rebates to cope with rising costs.

'Providing rebates would not solve the imbalance of supply and demand, which is the source of the problem. In fact, it might even accentuate the problem,' he said.

Mr Tharman noted that giving tax rebates on rentals may drive rents up further as they would boost demand without adding to supply in an already strong rental market.

He added: 'The real solution is to relieve the bottleneck in supply, which is what the Government has been seeking to do.'

Inderjit's analysis 'flawed', Kum Hong's 'reckless'
Christie Loh, Today Online 28 Feb 08;

AFTER two days of hearing criticisms about the Government's pursuit of economic growth at the cost of social cohesion, Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam has stepped forward with strong rebuttals.

Zooming in on points raised by two parliamentarians — Mr Inderjit Singh and Mr Siew Kum Hong — the minister sought to address what he dubbed "the most important debate" that arose during the discussion of Budget 2008: What is "the basic ethic that we want to sustain in our society"?

Is it, as Mr Singh suggested on Monday, a "growth-at-all-costs" policy that aims to expand as fast as possible in good times but inevitably leads to rising inflation and lower-income Singaporeans being worse off?

"This is plainly wrong," Mr Shanmugaratnam said yesterday. "It made for very entertaining listening, but it is in fact Inderjit's analysis that is flawed."

The minister explained that growth came about not because of the Government pumping in money to stimulate the economy, but due to measures to build up capabilities and infrastructure and to keep taxes competitive. This enables the people and businesses to take advantage of good times to offset weak years when the global economic cycle turns. Rejecting investors in the name of avoiding rapid growth would not make food more affordable or Singaporeans better off today, he said.

In fact, he said, buoyant 2007 was a good year for low-wage workers, as retrenchments sank to the lowest level since 1994.

Small businesses have also benefitted. Despite higher costs, their sales have risen due to the strong growth of Singaporeans' wages, he said.

"Our approach, therefore, is to provide the conditions for Singaporeans and our companies to succeed and to grow over the long term," said Mr Shanmugaratnam.

But he stressed that this strategy did not mean neglecting the less fortunate, contrary to the "impassioned speech" by Mr Siew, a Nominated Member of Parliament (MP).

On Tuesday, Mr Siew had said that the Government, being more concerned about not eroding the work ethic rather than caring for Singaporeans, was providing a minimal level of aid.

Mr Shanmugaratnam disagreed.

"His description does not square with the reality of the Government's interventions to support the lower-income group," he said, citing housing subsidies, Central Provident Fund top-ups, Medifund, ComCare schemes and the Workfare Income Supplement, recently introduced to cover the bottom 30 per cent of the population.

Whether the Workfare scheme needs to broadened — as some MPs have suggested — remains to be seen, as the first payments were given out just last month , said the Finance Minister.

But the basic philosophy of encouraging people to work, he stressed, cannot be shaken — which is why he said Mr Siew's "exhortation that we should ignore waste, ignore dead-weight loss, ignore disincentives to work, is reckless".

To help the poor, said Mr Shanmugaratnam, it is first necessary to expand the economy, create wealth and provide the incentive for Singaporeans to work.

"If our policies harm that, for the noblest of reasons, we will be in serious trouble, as many other countries have found," he added.


Read more!

Sungei Buloh: Dead fishes seen


Dead in the water
Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

Nature lovers were shocked to discover this scene at the Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve on Monday.

Straits Times reader Edmund Chan stumbled upon about 80 dead catfish and mullets in a brackish pond near the reserve, and sent this shot to The Straits Times' online portal, Stomp.

The National Parks Board said a combination of scorching temperatures and low rainfall made the fishes' natural surroundings too hot to live in, something that happens once every few years. The fish will now become food for the area's scavengers, or be washed out to sea.


Read more!

Pulau Ubin ferry: is $24 too much to pay for "rich biodiversity and rustic charm"?

Pulau Ubin ferry service should operate at fixed intervals during off-peak hours
Letter from Darren Goh Wei Rong, Straits Times Forum 28 Feb 08;

Why is the writer so stingy about paying $24 for two when there are so many willing to pay $35 per person just to hop onto the Flyer?: comment on the letter on the ST website

RECENTLY, I brought my friend who was visiting Singapore to Changi Beach.

We decided to head over to Pulau Ubin for a quick visit because I wanted to show her a different side of Singapore.

We arrived at Changi Point Ferry Terminal at 3pm on a weekday and there was no one else waiting for the ferry to Pulau Ubin.

I asked the ferry operator to take us to Pulau Ubin but he pointed to a sign board which stated that the ferry will only depart when there are 12 passengers.

The ferry operator offered to take us to Pulau Ubin immediately if we paid the fare for 12 passengers which would cost $24 or wait till there were more passengers.

We waited for 15 minutes but there were no other passengers so we decided to cancel our trip to Pulau Ubin because we felt that the ferry service was too expensive.

The Pulau Ubin ferry service should operate at fixed intervals during off-peak hours when passenger traffic is low.

For the ferry operator to insist on operating the ferry at maximum capacity will result in an unreasonably long wait or higher cost of visiting Pulau Ubin.

Public access to Pulau Ubin should be improved so that everyone can truly enjoy the rich biodiversity and rustic charm of the island.

Some "Latest comments" on the Straits Times website as of 9am 28 Feb 08;

I agree with tongcheekin.This bum boats don make much even though if there are 12pax to ferry.It's not that singapore has to show a good impression oto your foreign fren but it is you who had to show a good impression to your fren. Wats $24 to bring ur fren to the island when he already spend thousands of dollars to come to our island perhaps to see you. It all boils down to being a scrooge.
Posted by: joediver at Thu Feb 28 07:50:41 SGT 2008

For twenty over years, it has been this way.
The bumboat (not ferry) operator also need to make a living.
Why is the writer so stingy about paying $24 for two when there are so many willing to pay $35 per person just to hop onto the Flyer?
And he cited <>. So $24 for two is rather worth, and the whole bum boat to themselves, right?
Posted by: tongcheekin at Thu Feb 28 06:12:50 SGT 2008


Read more!

Sellers forced to dump pricey China veggies

Jessica Lim, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

FOR five mornings last week, vegetable seller Lai Tan Hock, 38, bundled 10kg of fresh leafy greens in newspaper, loaded them onto a cart, then dumped them into a rubbish truck stationed outside Tekka Market.

In all, he dumped about $300 worth of vegetables from China.

He was among many wet market stallholders who had to get rid of vegetables imported from China last week.

A Straits Times check showed that at least 12 vegetable sellers at two wet markets in Singapore did this.

The reason: the prices of China vegetables went through the roof because a bitter winter cold snap hit supplies, and shoppers refused to fork out money for them.

In some cases, vegetables like cai xin more than doubled in price. Mr Lai, for instance, was charging $5.50 per kg of cai xin, up from the usual $2.50.

Other vegetables affected by the crimp on supplies included kai lan, which doubled in price from $3 per kg to $6, and cauliflower, up 50 per cent from $20 a kg to about $30.

Said Mr Lai, who gets about 30 per cent of his supplies from China: 'Prices of vegetables from China went up so high that customers didn't buy. Vegetables get rotten fast, so we had to throw.'

The severe weather in China affected a tenth of the country's farmland, and about 10 per cent of the stricken acreage may see a complete loss of crops and vegetables.

According to an analysis by Credit Suisse on the outlook for China this year, the weather woes will have a 'significant impact on food supplies'.

In Singapore, vegetable sellers, afraid of being burnt again by the high prices of China produce, are turning away from the country.

Instead, they will import more from Malaysia, which is a cheaper supplier: prices are 30 per cent lower, on average.

Malaysia already supplies 46 per cent, or about 175,000 tonnes, of the fresh vegetable imports into Singapore.

But customers have been demanding more and more China vegetables because they look and taste different.

Chinese varieties of kai lan and cai xin, for example, taste better because the country's cooler weather has an impact on taste, said Mr Tan Chin Hian, managing director of Ban Choon Marketing, which supplies vegetables to about 20 wet markets in Singapore.

But Mr Tan added that consumers would not mind the taste difference if they can save some money.

'Many retailers at wet markets would switch to Malaysian products because their customers tend to put price above quality and will be sensitive to even the slightest price increases.'

In fact, several importers say they will give China vegetables a miss even after supplies stabilise, as is expected once warmer weather returns.

Said Mr Tan Swee Heng, 51, a vegetable wholesaler for the past 30 years: 'These few days, prices of vegetables from Malaysia are still very good. I will just go for the cheaper supplier.'

Singapore imported about 28 per cent - or 104,713 tonnes - of its fresh vegetables from China last year.


Read more!

Live, work, play the architect's way

Business Times 28 Feb 08;

Tan Kay Ngee is following the footsteps of his grandfather who ran a business from the shophouse where he lived, says ARTHUR SIM

THE notion that the best cities are those that blend small neighbourhood communities with large business districts is increasingly being recognised and championed.

But it is not really new.

It is also something that dawned on architect Tan Kay Ngee after he moved into his Tanjong Pagar home of two adjoining colonial-era Peranakan shophouses.

The building includes Mr Tan's photography gallery on the first floor, his architectural practice of 12 people on the second floor and a pied-a-terre on the top floor.

And if one subscribes to the new 'Live, Work and Play' outlook espoused by our urban planners, it is also a microcosm of the city - or a city within a city.

Mr Tan takes precedent from his past.

'My grandfather ran a business from the rooms on the ground floor of the shophouse in Circular Road. Everybody knew each other and there was a real sense of a little village on that street,' he says.

In his own way, Mr Tan is trying to bring back life to his street, which now only comes alive at night when the pubs and karaoke lounges open.

He has done this by first creating a space for local artists, primarily Singaporean photographers, who can exhibit and sell their work.

The gallery was formed together with his friend Tay Kay Chin, and is currently featuring the works of Chow Chee Yong.

An art gallery, of course, is nothing unusual, but one that is located in both your home and office takes on a different dimension. Anyone can walk off the five-foot way and into the gallery during opening hours. And this immediately provides a friendly platform to engage total strangers.

As an architect of some of Singapore's most iconic modern houses, Mr Tan also wanted to create a certain atelier atmosphere for his staff, so that Design with a big 'D' is constantly on everyone's mind.

But he believes that good design comes from various unexpected sources like fashion, film and of course, art. 'When you embrace all this, your architecture will have the feel of the moment,' he explained.

Mr Tan, who was part of the design team for the Singapore Management University campus (SMU), adheres to a design ethic which focuses special attention on contextual elements of design.

As with the SMU campus, which was raised in many areas to allow a continuous flow of the green plane of the grounds that was once Bras Basah Park, Mr Tan's shophouse home also addresses the tropical context.

'Designing a house is the smallest architectural brief, and most complex, because everything has to work,' he says.

With a large built-up area of about 4,800 square feet spread out over three floors, Mr Tan had a lot of space to play with. But most of the architectural insertions are there to emphasise the traditional shophouse. These, like the internal courtyard, work to drive fresh air through the building.

The architectural language that Mr Tan is most familiar with tends to include stainless steel and flat roofs, so working on a 100-year-old building threw up some pleasant surprises. 'You get first-hand experience on how these traditional houses work. For example, the pitched-roof really has hidden magical qualities. The air in the space created by the roof acts as a buffer against the heat and adds a cooling effect to the house. Normally, a concrete flat roof will absorb heat from the sun,' he explains.

There are design interventions in this home that do make it clearly a space of the 21st century. The predominance of humble plywood as a design feature is one.

'I search to understand materials,' Mr Tan says, explaining that where plywood has been used as a veneer for surfaces, the sheets of plywood have been selected and placed individually for grain and colour, 'like a work of art in itself'.

'There is a certain subtlety at play,' he added.

Other subtle touches can be found in the master bedroom, which one enters through an oversized palazzo-style timber door that clearly says 'Private - Keep Out'.

The master bedroom suite comes with an attached roof terrace where the shower is located. Looking down from the roof terrace, one can see Mr Tan's prized garden, which he has managed to rent from the authorities on a monthly basis.

There is a school of thought that believes that any conservation work should be clearly articulated to reveal that it is new rather than to mimic history. So where additional windows and openings have been added, the structural reinforcement is exposed.

The living space, which has a kitchenette attached, is defined by the sweeping pitch-roof which has the joists exposed to good effect.

Occasionally, Mr Tan's staff might have to annex certain areas in his home to work in, but he does not mind. Recalling the days of his grandfather again, and remembering how the people who worked in the shop would eat most meals with the family every day, he says: 'It's the old Chinese way.'


Read more!

Integrate foreign talents into Singapore society: DPM Wong

Yesterday in Parliament, Business Times 28 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE must push on with its efforts to attract global talents, but it must also pay equal attention to integrating them into the local society, according to Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng.

'Locals alone are not enough to meet our manpower demands,' he told Parliament yesterday during the debate on the budget for the Prime Minister's Office. 'Contrary to Inderjit Singh's (Ang Mo Kio) suggestion that the rate of immigration is too fast and unrealistic, we must not slow down in attracting global talent just because some people feel uneasy about it.'

Mr Wong said the war for talent is now global - and very intense. 'Whether we like it or not, those who are capable and talented will go to places with better opportunities and where they feel welcomed,' he said. 'And if Singapore does not welcome them, they will simply look elsewhere and they will then compete against us.'

Having a good living environment is key in drawing global talent - and Singapore has so far done well in this department, Mr Wong said.

'Singapore's excellent living environment has become our competitive advantage to root residents and attract investments and talents,' he said.

Many developed countries, while competing aggressively for global talents, are not doing enough to integrate them.

'This has resulted in clashes and disputes between communities in countries such as Australia, France and even the US,' Mr Wong noted. 'Such problems can also arise in Singapore if we do not make the effort to integrate our immigrants,' he cautioned.

'Open your hearts': Singaporeans urged to welcome new immigrants as numbers hit new high
Tan Hui Leng, Today Online 28 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE welcomed 63,600 Permanent Residents (PRs) and 17,300 new citizens last year — in total, nearly 15,000 more than the average combined number of PRs and new citizenships granted each year since immigration criteria were broadened in 2004.

By comparison, just 760 more babies were born last year than the year before, a figure "far" from raising Singapore's total fertility rate to replacement level.

As such, said Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng in rebutting suggestions that the rate of immigration was too fast and unrealistic, depending on homegrown citizens to meet our manpower needs was not enough.

Case in point: Last year, when 236,000 jobs were created, many companies, such as those in finance and business, had to turn to foreigners to meet the shortfall even as locals filled most of the jobs.

"A number of business and investment opportunities have passed us by, simply because we are facing such an acute shortage of manpower and office space. Once lost, these businesses and opportunities may not come back," said Mr Wong.

He was responding to concerns raised by seven parliamentarians about the influx of immigrants and the problems of integration.

On worries about whether the country could cope with a larger population, Mr Wong clarified that contrary to popular belief, there was no 6.5 million "population target" — this figure was a planning parameter.

He added the assurance that with "creative planning and technology", the island could accommodate larger numbers "without compromising the quality of our living environment".

But even as he stressed that Singaporeans must remain the core of the population — unlike some Middle Eastern countries where non-resident foreigners outnumber the indigenous residents — Mr Wong urged Singaporeans to open their "doors, minds and hearts" to new immigrants, who are key to the country's long-term prosperity.

With the intense global competition, he noted: "Whether we like it or not, those who are capable and talented will go to places with better opportunities and where they feel welcomed.

"If Singapore does not welcome them, they will simply look elsewhere and they will then compete against us."

Former Malaysian and new Singaporean Maria Chin, who has been living here since 2001, has generally had no problems fitting in. Nevertheless, she told Today, some Singaporeans have voiced their disdain for foreigners to her, not knowing she was an immigrant.

"They seem to think that foreigners are taking away their jobs and that they have a motive for joining grassroots work," said the 44-year-old purchasing officer who is herself the assistant treasurer of a Residents' Committee in Sembawang.

There are some 900 PRs who volunteer as grassroots leaders islandwide — many, like Mdm Chin, who interact with new immigrants and encourage them to embrace the local culture and community.

But Mr Wong acknowledged that integration would take time, even as it should be encouraged "in schools, at the workplace, in the neighbourhood and the larger community".

Steps are already being taken. The Education Ministry recently set up a unit to enhance the integration process in schools. Accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers has been cited for programmes to familiarise foreign staff with the local culture.

And the People's Association will soon introduce a host family programme, where foreigners are paired with local families.

The Government is also not neglecting overseas Singaporeans. Following the success of the inaugural Singapore Day in New York last April, at which 6,000 Singaporeans turned up, the second such event will be held in Melbourne this October.

DPM Wong Kan Seng says S'pore attracting more new PRs, citizens
Channel NewsAsia 27 Feb 08;

SINGAPORE: Singapore has been increasingly attracting new citizens and permanent residents (PRs), who help sustain the country's economic growth.

Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng said local Singaporeans alone are still not sufficient to meet the manpower demands here.

He revealed the latest immigration statistics during the debate on the Prime Minister's Office budget on Wednesday.

According to the figures, more foreigners have decided to call Singapore home for good.

Last year, Singapore saw over 63,000 new PRs, an 11-per-cent increase from 2006; and the city-state also welcomed more than 17,000 new citizens, a 30-per-cent jump.

Mr Wong said, however, there were only 760 more babies born last year compared to 2006.

He added that Singapore must continue to keep an open-door policy, both to new immigrants and foreign talents, although citizens remain the core of the population.

"For now, Singapore is a talent magnet for many. However, the global competition for talent is intense. Whether we like it or not, those who are capable and talented will be drawn to places with better opportunities and where they feel welcomed. And if Singapore does not welcome them, they will simply look elsewhere and they will then compete against us," said Mr Wong.

On integrating new citizens into the society, the minister cited some who have adapted to Singapore and are contributing to the city-state.

One of them is Kim Jin Ju from South Korea, a prefect at Yu Neng Primary. She participated in MediaCorp's Roving DV competition in 2006 and her school's entry came in first.

While he acknowledged MPs' concerns over the pace of immigration and social integration, Mr Wong said attracting immigrants will remain a key strategy to ensure the country's long-term growth and prosperity.

"So let us open our doors, minds and our hearts. We must work together, be welcoming to new immigrants and help integrate them into our community. There is a need for mutual acceptance, adjustment and respect. We can then live as one harmonious family to create even greater possibilities for ourselves, and our children and our future generations to come," Mr Wong said.

He also said schools, companies and the People's Association have implemented programs to help promote integration. But he noted that more can be done to break down barriers and dispel unwarranted biases.

Mr Wong added that Singaporeans based abroad are not forgotten. The government has been trying to engage them actively through events such as the Singapore Day. The inaugural event, held in New York last April, saw some 6,000 attendees.

He said another Singapore Day will be held in Melbourne, Australia this October. - CNA/ac


Read more!

Life sciences researcher sinks roots in Singapore

Zakir Hussain, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

Impressed by the work and living environment here - including the Botanic Gardens and various farms in north-west Singapore - they decided to become permanent residents in 2001.

WITH two degrees under his belt from the famous Shanghai Jiaotong University in China, Mr Yu Hao could have pursued his PhD at any top American university.

Fortunately for Singapore, orchids turned out to be the deal-breaker for Mr Yu, 35, a life sciences researcher who won the Singapore Youth Award in the science and technology category last year.

Mr Yu chose to study orchid biology here in 1997 because the National University of Singapore had a reputation in the field.

Six months later, his wife Wang Jing, now 34, came to NUS to do a PhD in biological sciences as well.

Impressed by the work and living environment here - including the Botanic Gardens and various farms in north-west Singapore - they decided to become permanent residents in 2001.

That same year, Mr Yu got his doctorate. Ms Wang got hers a year later. But a stint in California a year later reinforced Mr Yu's decision to sink roots here.

'We considered a place where my family and work could be stable, and where we could bring up children,' he said.

Since 2004, Mr Yu has been a principal investigator at the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory. Ms Wang is a post-doctoral researcher at the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology.

The couple and their two young children - daughter Yi Shan, seven, and son Qi Yuan, four - became Singaporeans in February 2006.

'We are proud to be members of a dynamic nation,' said Mr Yu.

'Giving up our previous citizenship was not really a struggle. Singapore's culture has integrated essences from various races,' he said.


Read more!

2lb of plastic poison found in whale's stomach

Banish the bags
The amazing picture of 2lb of plastic poison found in whale's stomach

The Daily Mail 27 Feb 08;

It looks like the kind of rubbish that piles up on waste ground or adorns hedgerows. But this collection of plastic bags was found in a far more disturbing place - the stomach of a minke whale washed up from the English Channel.

The young female suffered an appalling death, starved, exhausted and in agonising pain.


The discovery in 2002 was a wake-up call for marine scientists, who realised that plastic bags and other waste were one of the biggest threats to the whales, dolphins and turtles swimming around our shores.

The minke was found on the Normandy coast. At first, it was assumed she had died of natural causes.

When her stomach was cut open, scientists were amazed to find nearly two pounds of plastic bags, eaten by mistake as she searched for food.

The 2lb haul included two plastic bags from English supermarkets, seven transparent plastic bags, and fragments from seven dustbin bags.

In an ironic twist, one of the bags found in the gut of the dead whale appears to read: "We support good farm animal welfare."

Most worrying of all, there was no proper food in her stomach.

Minkes are among the smallest of the whales and the fastest moving. They can be seen swimming off the coasts of Scotland, Ireland and the South West.

The females are around 24ft long and weigh between five and ten tons. They can live for up to 60 years.

Although minkes are not threatened with immediate extinction, whale campaigners are concerned about their numbers. There are thought to be fewer than 184,000 left in the Atlantic.

Until the 1980s their biggest danger was hunters from Japan, Norway and Iceland. But another major threat has emerged in the plastic debris and rubbish in the seas.

Minkes feed by sieving huge amounts of water through plates in their mouths. The technique is supposed to catch small fish.

But as the seas get more polluted, the whales are also swallowing more rubbish.

The plastic can block their digestive tracts, causing serious internal damage. If the creatures consume enough bags, their stomachs become full, they stop eating and they starve.

A spokesman for the Marine Conservation Society said the Normandy minke had shocked the scientific world.

"It is an appalling amount of plastic to find in one female whale," he said. "It brings home what happens if we allow plastics into the marine environment."


Read more!

Sharks Decline But Attacks Rise

Robin Lloyd, LiveScience Yahoo News 27 Feb 08;

A diver who suffered a fatal shark bite in the Bahamas this week is part of a trend of increasing attacks around the world despite plummeting populations of the majestic fish.

If sharks are so threatened in the world's waters, why are attacks on humans on the rise?

Because the global population of humans is growing fast, so more people go to the beach, said George Burgess, curator of the International Shark Attack File at the Florida Museum of Natural History. And nowadays, beach-goers don't just go for a dunk. They hang out in shallow water (home for many sharks) for long periods of time to surf, windsurf, boogie-board, kayak and dive.

The number of worldwide shark attacks overall increased from 63 in 2006 to 71 in 2007, continuing a gradual upswing over the past four years, Burgess said.

There have been five unprovoked shark attacks so far this year (most shark attacks are unprovoked), Burgess said. However, the death of Markus Groh, 49, an Austrian lawyer, on Monday is under investigation and might be classified as provoked as he was part of an uncaged tourist dive off the Bahamas where chum is thrown into open water.

"There are more people in the water than there ever have been," Burgess told LiveScience. "We can pretty much predict that next year there will be even more attacks. Even if shark populations are declining, which we know they are, even in a local situation if populations have been depleted, there is still a probability of getting an attack."

Shark stats

Sharks are disappearing from the world's oceans due to overfishing, says Julia Baum, a researcher at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in San Diego. Baum and some of her shark-tracking colleagues made comments to reporters earlier this month at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston.

Sharks killed one human in 2007, according to the International Shark Attack File, but humans killed an estimated 38 million sharks for their fins each year, Baum said. That's as many sharks as the entire human populations of the 35 largest cities in the United States. Other estimates are nearly double that.

Some nations have banned shark fishing, but the bans are hard to enforce. And it's a free-for-all in international waters, Baum said.

The classic sharks, aka the "great sharks" such as the great white shark, scalloped hammerhead, mako sharks, thresher sharks, bull sharks and dusky sharks, are in trouble, she said. Deepwater species such as seal sharks, silky sharks, sleeper sharks and spined pygmy sharks are also at risk, said shark biologist Colin Simpfendorfer of James Cook University.

A study Baum conducted at her previous job at Dalhousie University showed all great shark species in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean have declined by more than 50 percent since the early 1970s.

Everyone agrees that the great sharks' numbers are declining, but some experts think Baum's estimates are faulty and the real situation is less dire, Burgess said.

Little is known about deepwater sharks, even after an assessment of them by IUCN-The World Conservation Union, said Colin Simpfendorfer of James Cook University. Almost half of the known species of sharks occur in deep water and they are more vulnerable to fishing than shallow water sharks (the great sharks), he said.

Data from two case studies, one in southeastern Australian waters and the other in the northeastern Atlantic Ocean, showed reductions in abundance of about 90 percent in many species of sharks in less than 20 years, Simpfendorfer said.

New listings could help

The scale of the problem of disappearing sharks is global due to shark finning, the process of cutting off a shark's fins and throwing the rest of the animal overboard still alive, leaving it to die, Baum said.

Finning makes use of only 2 to 5 percent of the animal, but shark fins are now one of the most highly valued marine commodities. A bowl of shark fin soup can sell for $100, so there is high incentive for fishermen to fin.

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service is proposing to effectively close down much of the coastal large shark fisheries, Baum said. "This would be a very positive step forward for shark management in the U.S.," she said.

The European Union has acted to restrict pressure on deepwater sharks, Simpfendorfer said.

And white sharks have been listed as vulnerable by the IUCN Red List, said shark researcher Salvador Jorgensen of Stanford University.

In the 2008 IUCN Red List, forthcoming later this year, five additional great shark species will be listed in the threatened categories, including the shortfin mako shark and three species of thresher shark, each of which will be listed as vulnerable. The scalloped hammerhead will be listed as globally endangered, Baum said.

"Sharks evolved 400 million years ago, and yet we could now lose some species in the next decade, so that would be just the blink of an eye in evolutionary time," Baum said.

Sharks are thought to be crucial to the entire marine ecosystem: they are top predators and help to keep smaller sharks and rays from devouring too many scallops, clams and other commercially important species of marine life.

You'll live

Meanwhile, if you do suffer a shark bite, your odds of living are greater than 90 percent. The rate of shark-attack fatalities hit an all-time low in 2007 for the past 20 years, Burgess said.

In fact, the trend for shark-bite fatalities in the 20th century is "down, down, down, decade by decade," Burgess said. The reason is better medical care.

As a result of multiple wars in the last century, medicine has learned how to do a much better job of saving people with traumatic injuries, Burgess said. "The whole process from water onto operating table or stitches occurs with greater rapidity and more professionalism," he said.

The real story isn't shark attacks, Burgess said. "The real story is what is happening to skates, sharks and rays on a worldwide basis. We have witnessed, in the last 20 to 30 years, huge declines in these animals worldwide."


Read more!

Monsoon intensity driven by Earth's orbit: study

Marlowe Hood Yahoo News 27 Feb 08;

The monsoon rains that drench tropical and subtropical Asia from June through September vary in duration and intensity in keeping with tiny wobbles in Earth's orbit as it circles the Sun, according to a study released Wednesday.

These cycles wax and wane every 23,000 years, said the study, based on the breakthrough use of stalagmites from a cave in central-eastern China to measure changes in climate patterns over the last quarter million years.

"The implications are that the present Asian summer monsoon is relatively weak in comparison to a few thousand years ago and that is will stay at this level for centuries more," lead researcher Hai Cheng of Nanjing Normal University in China's Jiangsu Province told AFP.

The findings, however, do not take into account the relatively recent impact of greenhouse gas-driven global warming, which climate scientists predict could significant alter monsoon patterns.

Three irregularities in the movement of Earth -- its orbit, the angle at which it is tilted, and the axis of rotation -- all combine to create a periodic variation in the amount of incoming solar radiation, explained Cheng.

It is this so-called precessional cycle that is largely responsible for longterm changes in monsoon duration and strength, the researchers found.

Monsoons occur with the seasonal reversals of wind directions caused by temperature differences between the land and sea.

While found elsewhere in the world, they are most pronounced in Asia in part due to the impact of the massive Tibetan Plateau.

Economies in tropical and sub-tropical Asia, especially around the Indian subcontinent, depend on monsoon rainfall to grow crops on land that is largely unirrigated.

But heavy monsoons can also bring massive flooding, causing severe economic damage and loss of life.

As significant as the findings, arguably, are the methods used to collect them.

Cheng and his colleagues measured the oxygen isotope ratios locked in the stalagmites built up from the floor of the Sanbao Cave to determine changes in climate over millennia, said the study, published in the British journal Nature.

Compared with other commonly used proxies of paleoclimatology such as tree-rings and ice cores, speleothems -- as these mineral deposits are called -- provide a record over a much longer timescale.

This technique "will likely replace the Greenland ice records as the chronological benchmark for correlating and calibrating climate variability," said Cheng.

It also allows for a new level of precision, achieved by measuring the growth of the isotope thorium-230 from the slow radioactive decay of uranium, found in trace amounts in the deposits.

"What emerges is a record of monsoon variation unprecedented in its detail and chronology stretching back 224,000 years," said Jonathan Overpeck and Julia Cole, both geologists at the University of Arizona, in a commentary, also in Nature.

The word "monsoon" is thought to have originated from the Arabic word "mausim," which means season.


Read more!

Moral appeal for UK energy saving

Richard Black, BBC News 27 Feb 08;

The battle against climate change has been described by a church leader as a "moral issue", at the launch of a strategy to reduce UK electricity use.

The Bishop of London said parts of the world are already affected by change.

Energy Saving Day, which is backed by environmental and religious groups and major energy companies, asks people to turn off electrical devices not in use.

Over 24 hours from 1800 GMT Wednesday, the National Grid will monitor what effect this has on UK consumption.

The BBC News website will be displaying results in close to real time.

Major energy companies including EDF, E.On and National Power are offering customers simplified access to home insulation.

At a launch event featuring a bicycle-powered cinema showing specially-commissioned short films on climate, bishop Dr Richard Chartres made the moral case for taking part.

"Let us remember people in the Ganges delta who are already feeling the effects of sea level rise and climate change," he said.

"The science changes year by year - though rarely in the right direction - but the moral imperative remains the same."

Responsible reward

E-Day was conceived and developed by Matt Prescott, a scientist and long-time campaigner for low-energy lightbulbs.

"I'm delighted by the way in which so many organisations from all sectors of society have been prepared to see what they can do to help tackle climate change," he told BBC News.

"They have offered to set aside their day-to-day differences in order to highlight that they accept the available science, agree that saving energy is a good idea, and want to simplify and widen access to some of the other potential solutions to climate change."

Those organisations include some of the UK's principal energy retailers, and the environmental groups that sometimes lambast them for their greenhouse gas emissions.

"We do call on companies to take more action," said Ashok Sinha, director of Stop Climate Chaos, an umbrella campaigning group on climate change.

"But we think it's welcome that they're encouraging their customers to save energy - that's responsible behaviour for an energy company."

The government obliges energy providers to offer energy saving measures to their customers.

People can use the E-Day website to register their interest in receiving help from these companies with loft and wall insulation.

Grid lines

E-Day started life as a Planet Relief, which was to have been an awareness-raising BBC TV programme with a large element of comedy.

But in September the BBC decided to pull the project, saying viewers preferred factual or documentary programmes about climate change.

The decision came after poor audiences for Live Earth, and public debate over whether it was the corporation's role to "save the planet".

Dr Prescott then decided to see whether he could mount E-Day as an independent operation, and secured the backing of important partners such as the energy companies and the National Grid.

Its role is crucial, acting as an independent and credible monitor of how much difference E-Day makes to the UK's electricity consumption.

Part of the Grid's job is to forecast demand for electricity. It says its forecasts are usually accurate to within 1% - so comparing demand across the 24 hours of E-Day with its predictions should provide an accurate measure of whether the initiative has made much difference.

Dr Prescott believes savings are likely to be small, up to 3%.

But even this could be the equivalent of taking a coal-fired power station off line for the day.

And he hopes the event will help confirm the idea that personal action can make a noticeable impact on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.


Read more!

Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits

Huge budget deficit means millions more face starvation

Julian Borger, The Guardian 26 Feb 08;

The United Nations warned yesterday that it no longer has enough money to keep global malnutrition at bay this year in the face of a dramatic upward surge in world commodity prices, which have created a "new face of hunger".

"We will have a problem in coming months," said Josette Sheeran, the head of the UN's World Food Programme (WFP). "We will have a significant gap if commodity prices remain this high, and we will need an extra half billion dollars just to meet existing assessed needs."

With voluntary contributions from the world's wealthy nations, the WFP feeds 73 million people in 78 countries, less than a 10th of the total number of the world's undernourished. Its agreed budget for 2008 was $2.9bn (£1.5bn). But with annual food price increases around the world of up to 40% and dramatic hikes in fuel costs, that budget is no longer enough even to maintain current food deliveries.

The shortfall is all the more worrying as it comes at a time when populations, many in urban areas, who had thought themselves secure in their food supply are now unable to afford basic foodstuffs. Afghanistan has recently added an extra 2.5 million people to the number it says are at risk of malnutrition

"This is the new face of hunger," Sheeran said. "There is food on shelves but people are priced out of the market. There is vulnerability in urban areas we have not seen before. There are food riots in countries where we have not seen them before."

WFP officials say the extraordinary increases in the global price of basic foods were caused by a "perfect storm" of factors: a rise in demand for animal feed from increasingly prosperous populations in India and China, the use of more land and agricultural produce for biofuels, and climate change.

The impact has been felt around the world. Food riots have broken out in Morocco, Yemen, Mexico, Guinea, Mauritania, Senegal and Uzbekistan. Pakistan has reintroduced rationing for the first time in two decades. Russia has frozen the price of milk, bread, eggs and cooking oil for six months. Thailand is also planning a freeze on food staples. After protests around Indonesia, Jakarta has increased public food subsidies. India has banned the export of rice except the high-quality basmati variety.

"For us, the main concern is for the poorest countries and the net food buyers," said Frederic Mousseau, a humanitarian policy adviser at Oxfam. "For the poorest populations, 50%-80% of income goes on food purchases. We are concerned now about an immediate increase in malnutrition in these countries, and the landless, the farmworkers there, all those who are living on the edge."

Much of the blame has been put on the transfer of land and grains to the production of biofuel. But its impact has been outweighed by the sharp growth in demand from a new middle class in China and India for meat and other foods, which were previously viewed as luxuries.

"The fundamental cause is high income growth," said Joachim von Braun, the head of the International Food Policy Research Institute. "I estimate this is half the story. The biofuels is another 30%. Then there are weather-induced erratic changes which caused irritation in world food markets. These things have eaten into world levels of grain storage.

"The lower the reserves, the more nervous the markets become, and the increased volatility is particularly detrimental to the poor who have small assets."

The impact of climate change will amplify that already dangerous volatility. Record flooding in west Africa, a prolonged drought in Australia and unusually severe snowstorms in China have all had an impact on food production.

"The climate change factor is so far small but it is bound to get bigger," Von Braun said. "That is the long-term worry and the markets are trying to internalise it."

The WFP is holding an emergency meeting in Rome on Friday, at which its senior managers will meet board members to brief them on the scale of the problem. There will then be a case-by-case assessment of the seriousness of the situation in the affected countries, before the WFP formally asks for an increased budget at its executive board meeting in June.

But the donor countries are also facing higher fuel and transport costs. For the biggest US food aid programme, non-food costs now account for 65% of total programme expenditure.

Global impact: Where inflation bites deepest

1 United States The last time America's grain silos were so empty was in the early seventies, when the Soviet Union bought much of the harvest. Washington is telling the World Food Programme it is facing a 40% increase in food commodity prices compared with last year, and higher fuel bills to transport it, so the US, the biggest single food aid contributor, will radically cut the amount it gives away.

2 Morocco 34 people jailed this month for taking part in riots over food prices.

3 Egypt The world's largest importer of wheat has been hard hit by the global price rises, and most of the increase will be absorbed in increased subsidies. The government has also had to relax the rules on who is eligible for food aid, adding an extra 10.5 million people.

4 Eritrea It could be one of the states hardest hit in Africa because of its reliance on imports. The price rises will hit urban populations not previously thought vulnerable to a lack of food.

5 Zimbabwe With annual inflation of 100,000% and unemployment at 80%, price increases on staples can only worsen the severe food shortages.

6 Yemen Prices of bread and other staples have nearly doubled in the past four months, sparking riots in which at least a dozen people were killed.

7 Russia The government struck a deal with producers last year to freeze the price of milk, eggs, vegetable oil, bread and kefir (a fermented milk drink). The freeze was due to last until the end of January but was extended for another three months.

8 Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai has asked the WFP to feed an extra 2.5 million people, who are now in danger of malnutrition as a result of a harsh winter and the effect of high world prices in a country that is heavily dependent on imports.

9 Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf announced this month that Pakistan would be going back to ration cards for the first time since the 1980s, after the sharp increase in the price of staples. These will help the poor (nearly half the population) buy subsidised flour, wheat, sugar, pulses and cooking fat from state-owned outlets.

10 India The government will spend 250bn rupees on food security. India is the world's second biggest wheat producer but bought 5.5m tonnes in 2006, and 1.8m tonnes last year, driving up world prices. It has banned the export of all forms of rice other than luxury basmati.

11 China Unusually severe blizzards have dramatically cut agricultural production and sent prices for food staples soaring. The overall food inflation rate is 18.2%. The cost of pork has increased by more than half. The cost of food was rising fast even before the bad weather moved in, as an increasingly prosperous population began to demand as staples agricultural products previously seen as luxuries. The government has increased taxes and imposed quotas on food exports, while removing duties on food imports.

12 Thailand The government is planning to freeze prices of rice, cooking oil and noodles.

13 Malaysia and the Philippines Malaysia is planning strategic stockpiles of the country's staples. Meanwhile the Philippines has made an unusual plea to Vietnam to guarantee its rice supplies. Imports were previously left to the global market.

14 Indonesia Food price rises have triggered protests and the government has had to increase its food subsidies by over a third to contain public anger.
FAQ: Food prices


Few winners and many losers


What is the problem?

In the three decades to 2005, world food prices fell by about three-quarters in inflation-adjusted terms, according to the Economist food prices index. Since then they have risen by 75%, with much of that coming in the past year. Wheat prices have doubled, while maize, soya and oilseeds are at record highs.

Why are food prices rising?

The booming world economy has driven up prices for all commodities. Changes in diets have also played a big part. Meat consumption in many countries has soared, pushing up demand for the grain needed by cattle. Demand for biofuels has also risen strongly. This year, for example, one third of the US maize crop will go to make biofuels. Moreover, the gradual reform and liberalisation of agricultural subsidy programmes in the US and Europe have reduced the butter and grain mountains of yesteryear by eliminating overproduction.

Who are the winners and losers?

Farmers are the obvious winners, as are poor countries that rely extensively on food exports. But consumers are having to pay more, and the urban poor in many developing states will be hardest hit, as they often spend more than a third of their income on food.

How long are prices likely to be high?

The US department for agriculture says the country's wheat stocks are at their lowest for 50 years and demand will continue to exceed supply this year. There is potential to bring more land into production in countries such as Ukraine, but that could take time. And as all foodstuffs have risen sharply in price there is little incentive for farmers to switch from one crop to another.

What about the EU's common agricultural policy?

High food prices certainly remove the need to subsidise farmers and so there is a chance, say experts, that badly needed reductions in CAP subsidies, which cost European taxpayers dearly, could now be within reach.

Are other commodity prices also rising?

Oil, metals and coal have seen their prices rise strongly as the global economy has expanded rapidly, driving up demand for almost everything,

particularly from emerging economies such as China and India. Some economists think speculation may also play a part. Disappointed by the sub-prime collapse and falling property values in many countries, investors have piled money into commodities.
Ashley Seager


Read more!

The real cost of palm oil


Andy Ho, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

WHEN GOING GREEN GOES WRONG
A 2007 University of Leicester study found that for every hectare of oil palm, 170 tonnes of carbon are released into the air over the plantation's useful life of 25 years. By contrast, each hectare of peat-swamp absorbs 2.6 tonnes of carbon annually, so it stores 65 tonnes over 25 years. Producing palm oil on peatland, in other words, results in a net emission of carbon.


WE HAVE had bad air for the past few days. Prevailing winds have brought in the haze from Riau's forest fires. The culprits responsible for this are big plantation companies that burn forests to clear land to plant oil palm.

Widely used in food and cosmetics, palm oil accounts for 21 per cent of the global edible oils market. It is also used to make a renewable fuel called biodiesel, the main user of which is the European Union (EU).

In 2003, the EU announced it was mandating biofuels in 5.75 per cent of transportation by 2010, and 10 per cent by 2020. This initiative stoked investment in oil palm plantations and biodiesel refineries in Indonesia.

Since biodiesel is made from a plant, carbon is absorbed while the palm is growing, which is released when the green fuel is burned. Thus, compared to fossil fuels, biodiesel would be neutral in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, it was argued.

We know now that things are not so simple. The process of producing palm oil itself takes a heavy toll on the environment. Still, the biofuel industry favours the palm as 1ha of it yields 20 tonnes of the crude. By contrast, biofuels like soybean and corn yield just 7.5 and 3 per cent of that, respectively.

By early last year, there were 6.1 million ha of oil palm in Indonesia, up from 600,000ha in 1985. Palm oil production rose from 157,000 tonnes in 1964 to 15.9 million tonnes in 2006, with exports jumping from 126,000 tonnes to 11.6 million tonnes in the same period. Last year, these exports were worth US$4.43 billion (S$6.3 billion).

As it is an important source of foreign exchange and employment, the Indonesian government wants to expand oil palm to the eastern part of the country. While Riau has the biggest area under palm cultivation now, plantation companies are being given forest concessions in Kalimantan, Irian Jaya and Sulawesi for further expansion.

It would be environmentally friendlier to rehabilitate disused rice paddies or old oil palm plantations, but that would cost more than clearing rainforests. Moreover, with forest concessions, companies can also sell the valuable tropical timber that they harvest.

The logging, however, is often uncontrolled, leading to the erosion of top soil that is then washed by rain into rivers, thus aggravating floods. Also, after the logging is done, firms tend to burn the logged-over areas to clear them, though this is illegal. Trees soak up carbon as they grow; when they are burned, they release it back into the atmosphere.

In addition, these forest fires often spread beyond their planned areas. At least 19 of Indonesia's protected national parks have been affected thus, including a Unesco-registered wetland in Sumatra.

Forest fires consumed 50,000 sq km of Indonesia's rainforests in 1994. Another 46,000 sq km went up in smoke in 1997-98. Of the 176 firms which used fires illegally to clear forests in 1997-98, 133 were oil palm companies. A 2007 United Nations Environment Programme report confirmed that planting oil palm was the main cause of deforestation in Indonesia.

Apart from rainforests, these companies also resort to clearing peat-swamp forests, which they first drain. Timber found in these forests is logged and the logged-over land is also cleared by burning. These boggy swamps absorb rain and run-off, thus helping to mitigate flooding and erosion. When they are drained and burned, however, the risk of flooding rises.

Moreover, these bogs have partially decomposed plant matter that has been sitting underground for centuries, effectively storing carbon. The 4 million ha of peatlands in Riau alone store 14.6 billion tonnes of carbon, experts estimate. When drained, the peat is exposed to oxygen and decomposes, thus releasing carbon. Of the 22.5 million ha of peatland in Indonesia, 10 million have been drained, studies estimate. When the peat-swamp forests are burned, the fires smoulder underground for years even if the surface fires are extinguished.

A 2007 University of Leicester study found that for every hectare of oil palm, 170 tonnes of carbon are released into the air over the plantation's useful life of 25 years. By contrast, each hectare of peat-swamp absorbs 2.6 tonnes of carbon annually, so it stores 65 tonnes over 25 years.

Producing palm oil on peatland, in other words, results in a net emission of carbon. This conclusion was supported by a study published in the journal Science this month. Peatland abuse has made Indonesia the third-largest carbon emitter in the world after the United States and China.

But it is rainforests, the world's richest ecosystems, that have captured the imagination of many. Not only do they house 70 per cent of all known flora and fauna species, they may also hold 200 species of trees per hectare compared to just a few in temperate forests.

Besides trees, rainforests contain innumerable species of vines, shrubs, mosses, and other plants. The unprecedented scale of deforestation in Indonesia - two-thirds of the forests in Sumatra and half in Borneo have been cleared - threatens many species.

Among the rainforest's more charismatic residents are mammals - like the Sumatran tiger, the Sumatran rhinoceros, the Sumatran orangutan, langurs, and so on. According to the World Conservation Union, 32 per cent of over 400 mammal species in Indonesia are threatened.

These animals can survive only in rainforests, not monoculture oil palm plantations where the varieties of leaves, fruits, roots and shoots they need to eat do not exist. The Conservation Union's authoritative Red List Of Threatened Species reports that 15 Indonesian species are critically endangered. A World Bank study has warned that Indonesia is 'almost certainly undergoing a species extinction spasm of planetary proportions'.

As if all this weren't enough, even processing the oil palm fruit can harm the environment. Because it must be processed within 24 hours of being harvesting, hundreds of small mills have been put up throughout rural Indonesia. Many of these discharge their effluent - oil residue and crushed shells - untreated into waterways. In Sumatra, in 2002, the Siak River was thus polluted, killing off thousands of fish. In 2003, the Kuning River in Sumatra suffered the same fate.

Admitting that such environmental consequences had not been anticipated when it mandated biofuels, the EU issued a new directive in January. This requires biofuels to show an overall cut of 35 per cent in carbon emissions compared to fossil fuels. However, the directive exempts biodiesel sourced from plantations established before 2003.

Indonesia exports 40 per cent of its crude palm oil to India and China, so no let-up in the expansion of the crop's cultivation is expected. Palm oil prices have been climbing uninterruptedly since mid2007, setting a new record of US$1,217 per tonne this week.

Don't hold your breath, haze or no haze.


Read more!

Market not the answer to climate change

Benjamin K. Sovacool & Toby J. Carroll, Straits Times 28 Feb 08;

EVIDENCE suggests that the market mechanisms currently being touted to address climate change could benefit the few in the short term - and fail all in the long term.

These market mechanisms include carbon trading (where licences to pollute one tonne of carbon are traded among firms) and carbon offsets (where developed countries build carbon-friendly infrastructure in the developing world). There are at least four reasons to be sceptical of their potential.

First, they attempt to reconcile a pro-growth model of development with improvements in the environment. This gives rise to a technocratic approach to the problem that has little chance of succeeding.

The problem with climate change is that reconciling infinite growth with the environment is no technical matter. Nature, unlike the paradigm of perpetual economic growth, appears to be rapidly approaching finite limits. Indeed, climatologists and atmospheric scientists have warned of the likelihood of tipping points, or climate-forcing thresholds, such as the extreme melting of ice or rising sea levels, beyond which changes are impossible to reverse.

Second, addressing climate change through carbon offsets will most likely be detrimental to many in the underdeveloped world.

Alternative transportation fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel, for instance - promoted as a way for developed countries to 'offset' their emissions by investing in the developing world - have increased the global prices of corn, cassava, sugar cane, palm oil and soybeans. This has the largest impact on the poor, who spend 55 to 75 per cent of their income on food.

The recent 'tortilla riots' in Mexico, where the urban poor could not afford higher corn prices, and the 2006 Indonesian protests against high soybean and palm oil prices may be harbingers of more serious conflicts to come.

Third, the promotion of global offsets would penalise developing countries and solidify their dependence on developed nations. It would allow industrial nations to buy limitless amounts of cheap emission reductions in poor countries and bank them indefinitely for the future. This means that when developing nations are obliged to cut their own emissions, they would be left with only the most expensive options.

Fourth, offsets and carbon credits suffer from the assumption that a one-to-one relationship between carbon emissions and offsets exists. The energy-intensive nature of some offsets - such as carbon capture and sequestration - proves no such thing.

Accounting for the energy needed to capture, transport, inject and store carbon dioxide, firms have to sequester two to three tonnes to 'offset' every tonne they emit.

Moreover, efforts to offset carbon by means of afforestation (planting of trees), protecting existing grasslands and injecting carbon dioxide into underground caverns and aquifers run the risk of reaching biological saturation. Some forests can only store a certain amount of carbon no matter how many trees they have.

Also, investing purely in biological offsets such as plants could contribute dangerously to climate change if many of the world's forests turn from sinks (vegetation that absorbs carbon dioxide) to sources (vegetation that releases carbon dioxide). This is a real possibility given that forests and grasslands are at the ever-present mercy of floods, more severe weather, new strains of disease - not to mention vested interests that could later decide to alter land practices.

What we need is a qualitatively different approach - the equivalent of a 'Green New Deal' to address climate change. This would entail building informed constituencies for reform and social movements that can check the sources of climate-changerelated behaviour. It also entails recognising the qualitative differences among carbon mitigation and adaptation techniques. Not all carbon credits and offsets are 'equal', and they should not be treated as such.

The truth is the market is not always the best instrument to pursue public policy goals. The writers are research fellows at the Centre on Asia and Globalisation at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.


Read more!

Solar Power's Greenhouse Emissions Measured

Charles Q. Choi, LiveScience Yahoo News 27 Feb 08;

Solar energy has long been touted as better for the environment than fossil fuels.

Increasingly, however, there are fears that making solar cells might release more hazardous pollution than fossil fuels would.

To ease those concerns, scientists studied the matter closely and now conclude that manufacturing solar cells produces far fewer air pollutants than conventional fossil-fuel-burning power plants.

The researchers gathered air pollution emissions data from 13 manufacturers of four major commercial types of solar cells in Europe and the United States from 2004 to 2006.

Making solar or photovoltaic cells requires potentially toxic heavy metals such as lead, mercury and cadmium. It even produces greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, that contribute to global warming. Still, the researchers found that if people switched from conventional fossil fuel-burning power plants to solar cells, air pollution would be cut by roughly 90 percent.

Although manufacturing solar cells requires heavy metals, the researchers noted that coal and oil also contain heavy metals, which get released during combustion.

"One of the most promising photovoltaic technologies is based on cadmium telluride, but cadmium is one of the worst heavy metals. Still, if we compare direct emissions from production of cadmium telluride cells with coal power plants, toxic emissions would up 300 times lower," said researcher Vasilis Fthenakis, an environmental engineer at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, N.Y.

In fact, most of the toxic emissions from making solar cells come indirectly from fossil fuel-burning power plants, which provide the electricity needed for manufacture. Ironically, solar cell factories will likely need to rely on fossil fuels for power for a while, since solar power is too intermittent to use, Fthenakis explained, shutting down as it does when the sun goes down.

Still, Fthenakis added, scientists are researching ways to economically store power from solar cells on a large scale. Doing so could help lead to solar cell factories that run off solar power, "a self-sustained process," he told LiveScience.

Fthenakis and his colleagues detailed their findings in the March 15 issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.


Read more!

Asia can lead the way in low-carbon aviation

Giovanni Bisignani, Straits Times Forum 28 Feb 08;

AVIATION is the lifeblood of the Asian economy. Across the region, 10.5 million aviation-related jobs support a US$807 billion (S$1.13 trillion) business. So it should come as no surprise that the industry is growing. What may surprise many is the responsible approach the air transport industry has taken globally to its environmental impact.

Let us start with the facts. T

he Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that aviation contributes 2 per cent of the world's man-made carbon dioxide. This is expected to grow to 3 per cent by 2050. This is far less than the current emissions from road transport, shipping, deforestation or energy production. Aviation is, and will remain, a small part of the big problem of climate change.

Being small is not a licence for complacency. And a growing carbon footprint would be unacceptable for any industry. The challenge is to keep the many benefits of aviation while eliminating the negatives.

Aviation has delivered impressive results. Over the last four decades, fuel efficiency has improved by 70 per cent. The billions being invested in new aircraft, some of which we saw at the recent Singapore Airshow, are helping to put aviation on target for a further 25 per cent improvement in fuel efficiency by 2020.

It is not just buying new aircraft. How we operate them has an important role to play.

The International Air Transport Association's (IATA) 'Green Teams' are working with airlines worldwide to identify environmental efficiencies.

Last year we identified operational measures that saved 7 million tonnes of CO2. Another 4 million tonnes of CO2 was saved by shortening more than 300 routes.

In Asia, re-organising air traffic over the Bay of Bengal is saving 50,000 tonnes of CO2 a year. Modernised approach procedures at Japanese airports will save 160,000 tonnes of CO2. And if we could sort out the tangle of air traffic procedures at the five airports in China's Pearl River Delta area, savings of 250,000 tonnes of CO2 are possible.

These achievements illustrate the positive impact of IATA's four- pillar strategy on climate change: invest in new technology; operate aircraft effectively; build and use efficient infrastructure; and provide positive economic incentives. Together, these initiatives have limited the annual growth of our carbon footprint to 3 per cent, even while air travel expands at 5 to 6 per cent.

But we are aiming much higher. Last June, I challenged the industry to achieve carbon-neutral growth, on the way to a carbon-free future, by developing a zero-emission aircraft in 50 years time.

The industry united behind this goal. The vision is ambitious, but it is possible for an industry that went from the Wright brothers to the jet age within a similar time frame.

Some potential building blocks for this future already exist, including solar power, hydrogen cells and biofuel. Last week, IATA signed an agreement to support 'Solar Impulse' - the solar airplane that will fly around the world with no fuel and zero emissions. And Virgin Atlantic, Boeing and General Electric are powering a plane using biofuel. None of these initiatives alone will deliver all of the answers. But together they are a spark for innovations that can move us forward.

Asia has a role in building this future. By 2010, intra-Asia traffic will be the largest single aviation market in the world. With size comes responsibility. And that extends to the environment. With an aircraft fleet that is two years younger than the global average of 11.8 years, Asia already has a head start on fuel efficiency. And the region's growth is a unique opportunity to develop leading-edge infrastructure.

Asia also has the opportunity to avoid the political hypocrisy that has characterised the debate on this issue in Europe.

Taxes applied in the name of the environment have only helped solve budget problems. Europe's rushed unilateral approach to include aviation in its emissions trading scheme is contrary to international treaties. The legal battles that are sure to follow will only distract attention from solving real issues - such as saving 12 million tonnes of CO2 with a single European sky for air traffic management, something that has been stalled for decades.

There are two unique opportunities for Asia. First, the Apec transport ministers laid the groundwork for environmental leadership last year with an agreement that technology, operations and infrastructure must be at the core of aviation's environmental agenda in the region. Turning this from words to reality would constitute real progress.

Second, the region's sovereign wealth funds could be used strategically to fund basic research in green technologies. And with the G-8 meeting in Japan later this year, there is a ready-made global stage for Asia to show its support for environmental responsibility.

The writer is the director-general and CEO of the International Air Transport Association.


Read more!