Mangrove deforestation in the Philippines

Rony V. Diaz, The Manila Times 8 Jun 08;

THE storm surge that devastated villages in Irrawaddy at the height of cyclone Nargis would have been less destructive if there were mangroves in the estuaries and mudflats of the delta.

Mangroves are among the best natural defense of sheltered coastlines against wind and water during storms. This is one of the lessons of the tragedy in Myanmar that we should not overlook.

There were, at one time, according to the World Mangrove Atlas (International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, Okinawa, Japan, 1997), more than 200,000 square kilometers of mangrove forests in tropical and subtropical coastlines all over the world. They have been disappearing at the rate of one percent to 2 percent a year or at about the same rate as the disappearance of coral reefs and rainforests. The rate of loss is faster in developing countries where in the last 25 years 35 percent to 86 percent of mangrove forests have been destroyed, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

In the Philippines, the rate of destruction, extrapolated from international data sources, is between 40 percent and 45 percent in the last 10 years. Mangrove areas in Bulacan, Davao, Palawan, the two Mindoros, Bohol, Samar and Zamboanga have shrunk, putting their long-term survival at risk. If this rate of loss is not reversed, we would have no mangrove stands by the middle of the century.

Mangrove destruction is due mainly to human settlement and aquaculture but as the pace of urbanization quickens, reclamation and pollution will begin to take their toll.

Mangrove forests are ecosystems that sustain unique plant and animal species, many of which we still have to discover and study. It’s possible that many of them have become extinct with unforeseen effects on fragile mangrove ecology. Loss of functional diversity is particularly serious because mangrove ecosystems are species-poor. The FAO reports that in 26 of 120 countries, mangroves are critically endangered or fast becoming extinct. (“Status and trends in mangrove area extent worldwide,” FAO, 2003).

What are the known consequences of mangrove deforestation?

Mangrove ecosystems are an integral part of terrestrial and marine food webs. Their destruction will have an immediate effect on fishery productivity.

Mangroves also protect seaweed beds and coral reefs against river-borne silts and serve as breeding ground of certain species of fish that thrive in brackish water.

They also maintain salt marshes as filters of industrial and household wastes.

Certain species of mangrove are sources of fibers, chemicals and medicine. Palawan mangroves, for example, are raw materials for Japan’s chemical industries.

Mangrove forests function both as an atmospheric CO2 sink and a source of ocean carbon. They are important in the effort to slow down global warming. (E. McLeod and R.V. Salm, Managing Mangroves for Resilience to Climate Change, IUCN, 2006)

Finally, as said earlier, mangrove forests protect human settlements near coastlines from rising seas, storm surges and tsunamis. Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia and India are object lessons.

In light of all this, there’s an urgent need to conserve, protect and renew the mangrove trees and shrubs in sheltered coastlines and tidal wetlands. The endemic species—Rhizophora mangle, Avicenna nitida, and the Sonneratia varieties —are relatively easy to propagate.

Effective and enforceable policies and education strategies have to be implemented right away to reverse the loss of mangrove forests.

The Department of Agriculture, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and UP Los BaƱos should lose no time in putting together a plan to save and to expand the mangrove forests of the Philippines.


Read more!

Mauritius to boost coral farming

Afriquenligne 7 Jun 08;

Port-Louis, Mauritius - Coral farming can be a lucrative business for lar ge as well as small and medium enterprises (SME) in Mauritius since it tallies with the government¹s empowerment programme which encourages people, especially the unemployed and women entrepreneurs to launch themselves into SMEs, according to Ruby Moothien Pillay, the Project Officer at the Mauritius Oceanographic Institute (MOI).

MOI has launched a two-year pilot project on coral farming aimed at investigating optimal nursery conditions for growth and propagation of corals in land-based nurseries, with the ultimate goal of restoring and rehabilitating degraded reefs.

Also for the propagation of the rare, threatened and endangered species, marine aquarium trade, establishment of a coral aquarium, and for making handicrafts and jewellery for the tourism industry.

Presenting the preliminary results of the project at the University of Mauritius Friday, Mrs Pillay said to ensure the sustainability of the project, economic and social development and environmental conservation had to be interdependent and mutually reinforcing.

"This project has been developed with these three main components in mind, besides bringing in foreign currency, it will also meet social needs by creating jobs and catering for the conservation of the environment," she added.

Mrs. Pillay emphasised that coral business had its place in Mauritius as every foreign visitor would want take back the souvenir back home and the souvenir normally reflects something pertaining to the place visited.

Explaining the reasons for farming corals on land, she said coral propagules were less influenced by coral bleaching, diseases, cyclones, pollution, physical damages and oil spill.

On the present status of the project, she said four coral species -- Acropora au stera, A. formosa, A. selago and Pocillopora damicornis -- were under culture at the nurseries in Albion, on the western coast of the Island.

"No mortality was registered among the coral transplants of both the ocean and land-based nurseries and both are growing at the same rate," she explained.

PANA reports that the world's coral market involves some 70 countries that import coral and about 120 are involved in export.

The main traders are the US, Japan and the European Union to which Mauritius sells about 1,000 tonnes of the product annually.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 8 Jun 08


Zoanthids of Changi
and other finds on this living shore on the wildfilms blog and budak blog

Checking out stars on Pasir Ris
despite the downpour on the wonderful creations blog

Semakau walk
with dolphin sighting on the urban forest blog and manta blog on the tidechaser blog and discovery blog

Offshore island marinelife
on the manta blog

Anatomy of a munia's nest
on the bird ecology blog

St. John's island
on the manta blog


Read more!

Rising petrol prices prompt switch to 'green' transport

Tan Dawn Wei, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

With pump prices heading north, motorists here are switching to cheaper alternatives.

Some have given up their cars and moved to public transport. Others have downgraded to smaller cars or two-wheelers. A growing number have opted for hybrid-engine cars.

There's even a six-month waiting time for those who are keen to kit their cars out to run on compressed natural gas (CNG) because of a sudden surge in demand, according to motor workshops.

There were 248 CNG cars on the roads last year, but this has more than doubled to 538 in April this year.

Hybrid cars, or those that switch between petrol and electricity, also shot up in the same period, going by the Land Transport Authority's numbers. Another 289 have joined their ranks, bringing the total to 1,346.

Another popular 'green' choice is public transport. Singapore's total bus and train ridership hit a record 4.78 million rides a day in the first three months of this year.

The number of bids for certificates of entitlement (COEs) every month has also fallen since the beginning of this year, one more indicator that consumers are staying away from buying new cars.

COE bids for cars up to 1,600cc, for instance, fell from 3,005 bids in February to 2,500 this month.

'People are very cautious about buying big-ticket items now, with oil and food prices going up and property prices and shares moving down. They're adopting a wait-and-see approach,' said Tan Chong Motors' marketing director A.C. Neo.

If they do buy, says the Nissan distributor, small is in.

Borneo Motors, which sells Toyota cars, has also been selling more of its smaller capacity cars than its larger ones, said customer relations general manager Angeline Tan.

Another popular choice now is off-peak cars with the distinctive red plates. They can be driven from 7pm to 7am on weekdays, after 3pm on Saturdays and all day on Sundays and public holidays.

There are about 34,000 of them on the road now, compared to 2,644 just five years ago.

Mr Henry Ang, manager of car dealership Koh Brothers Automobile, said that he has seen a 20 per cent increase in the number of motorists who have switched from regular cars to off-peak cars to save money.

Petrol prices last went up two weeks ago, the 12th consecutive hike since last July. This brings pump prices here to between $2.153 and $2.386.

If you drive a 1,600cc car, that means you pay about $320 a month for petrol, going by the average distance covered. This is $70 more than the $250 you would have paid this time last year.

That bill is likely to go up as analysts expect petrol prices to hit $3 a litre here if oil prices reach US$200 (S$273) a barrel.

But energy consultant Ong Eng Tong of Mabanaft International said that he expects pump prices to end the year closer to $2.50 instead, which is about US$150 per barrel.

'Drivers will pay maybe $50 to $100 extra a month and this is discretionary income,' he said.

Hybrid saves him fuel and money
Aw Cheng Wei, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

To Mr Bernard Chew, 'hybrid' does not mean an orchid but his Toyota Prius, which has two engines: one petrol-driven, the other electric.

Mr Chew, 42, chief information officer at NTUC FairPrice, had predicted petrol prices would keep going up.

He put his money where his mouth is, and bought the fuel-sipping Japanese hybrid car for $85,000 in January last year.

He is glad too that his 'green' Prius is less pollutive. But the big plus for him is the fuel-saving factor.

A hybrid car is able to get more mileage because it uses its electric motor in stop-go traffic, and the petrol engine kicks in only when the car is cruising.

'My Prius gets about 25km per litre,' Mr Chew said.

A non-hybrid saloon like the Toyota Corolla averages around 13km per litre while a Honda Civic does about 11km per litre. The Toyota Prius goes for at least 17km to more than 20km per litre.

Because he is often on the road - about 2,000km each month - Mr Chew finds himself spending less now on fuel: about $160 each month.

His previous car, a Toyota Wish, cost him about $400 in monthly fuel costs.

Mr Chew now feels happier to use his car socially, as when he takes his family out for dinner.

He agreed that the upfront payment of a hybrid is higher - about $8,000 to $10,000 more than a similar-sized saloon car. But he said: 'If you plan to drive the car for a long time, this upfront sum will pay for itself.'

Indeed, hybrid cars are selling well here.

Borneo Motors' general manager for customer relations, Ms Angeline Tan, said there has been a 50 per cent increase in hybrid sales since fuel prices rose in July last year.

Its hybrids include the Toyota Prius, Lexus RX400 and Lexus LS600, the last of which has sold out.

It sold about 150 of its hybrid models last year. There is a waiting time of up till November for its Prius due to a shortage of production and increase in global demand.

Kah Motor, too, says its Honda hybrid sales have spiked this year. Its marketing manager, Mr Vincent Ng, said there has been a 176 per cent increase in hybrid sales in the first five months of this year over the same period last year.

A total of 283 Honda Civic hybrid models have been registered this year.

Kah Motor will introduce at least two more hybrid models in the next two years.

He saves $460 a month by cycling to work
Carmen Onggo, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

Mr David Tan, 33, gave up his car to cycle to work.

'I decided to cycle because I wanted to save on fuel and Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) costs,' he said.

But the car hasn't been sold. His wife, whose workplace is nearer their home, drives it now - chalking up about $200 a month on fuel.

It would be double that amount if Mr Tan, a regional financial analyst, drove the car instead.

The owner of a Strida foldable bicycle which costs $850, Mr Tan has been cycling to his workplace in Millenia Walk from his home in Upper Boon Keng since December 2006.

He enjoys the 20-minute ride. 'It is more convenient, and there is a breeze from the river in the morning, so I feel refreshed,' he said.

Mr Tan does not even need to shower at his office as he does not perspire much.

He admits, though, that bad weather can be a bother for a cyclist.

Also, he chafes at the bad driving habits shown by motorists towards cyclists. 'Cars cut in front of me without signalling on major roads like Kallang Road,' he said.

However, the optimist in him feels that the advantages of cycling outweigh the disadvantages.

'I can save money on fuel and other things like parking charges,' he said.

Mr Tan saves about $460 a month by taking to his two-wheeler.

'Driving costs, which include fuel, have gone up since 2006, so I would have to pay even more to drive now,' he said.

Ms Vivian Yuan, a marketing manager and owner of a foldable bicycle company, agrees with Mr Tan: 'There has been an increase in inquiries and bike sales because people want to save on petrol, ERP and parking costs.

'At the same time, they buy bikes for leisure and health purposes as well,' she added.

Car-sharing lets him drive on the cheap
Shuli Sudderuddin, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

After getting his driving licence last year, civil servant Jasni Hirman, 47, was looking forward to buying a car to ferry his family of five around.

However, in January this year, he found petrol prices steadily climbing. After re-thinking the car maintenance costs and Electronic Road Pricing fees, he opted for car-sharing instead.

He joined Whizzcar, a car-sharing scheme run by Popular Rent A Car, last month.

Car-sharing schemes allow users to book cars for short periods, usually with access to the vehicles at different locations across the island.

The pioneer of such schemes here was NTUC Income Car Co-op. Piloted in 1997, it had 36 members sharing four cars then. It now has 4,300 members, who share 165 cars in 67 locations.

The scheme took off and soon there were four major players: NTUC Income Car Co-op, Honda Intelligent Community Vehicle System, CitySpeed - which was linked to ComfortDelGro - and Whizzcar.

But now, only NTUC Income and Whizzcar remain.

The general manager for Whizzcar, Mr Ho Kok Kee, said that he had seen a membership increase of 5 to 10 per cent in the past few months, as well as a 15 per cent rise in revenue in the beginning of the year.

Whizzcar's 85 cars in 33 locations serve over 2,000 members.

About three times a month, Mr Jasni picks up a Toyota Vios from a location in Admiralty, near his Yishun house.

He uses it from about 9am to 7pm, driving his family to weddings, to pick groceries up and for outings at the beach.

He pays between $50 and $60 each time inclusive of petrol, on top of the $10 monthly membership fee and a $60 one-time entrance fee.

'This is a convenient way for me to be able to drive without expensive rental rates,' Mr Jasni said.

He owns 3 cars, all fitted with CNG kits
Aw Cheng Wei, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

Mr Roy Thong owns three cars - all are configured to run on compressed natural gas (CNG) as well as petrol.

Mr Thong, 36, director of a local information technology firm, drives one of the three cars, a Honda Stream. He covers 75km to 100km each day and visits the CNG station in Mandai once every two days to top up the Honda's CNG cylinder.

Previously, his Honda's fuel cost was $800 to $900 a month. After installing the CNG kit, he now pays $380 to $400 monthly for petrol and about $200 a month for CNG.

'Every week, I save about $50. I expect to save about $2,400 per year,' he said.

He came across CNG conversion kits while browsing a website. 'I was reading Singapore Carmart. There was a paragraph on CNG kits. Installing a CNG kit saves the environment and money, so why not?'

The downside, he said, is the reduced boot space, but he feels that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

'I think of the extra weight as an extra passenger,' said Mr Thong.

Mr Francis Lim, general manager of Billy CarCare, which does CNG conversions, feels that CNG-capable cars are not popular yet because of the lack of CNG filling stations.

There are two CNG stations - in Jalan Buroh and Mandai Link.

Three more stations - in Jalan Bukit Merah, Serangoon North and Bedok North - are expected to open by the end of the year.

CNG is priced at $1.38 per kg. On average, a 66-litre cylinder carries about 11kg of CNG. A car can travel about 15km on each kg of CNG, Mr Lim said. He expects more cars to become CNG-capable because of rising oil prices. Uncertainty over Malaysia's policy on foreign cars filling up there is also a factor.

Since the price of petrol started rising in July last year, there has been a 30 per cent surge in his business, said Mr Lim.

About 300 vehicles are waiting to be converted at Billy CarCare. The waiting period stretches till August. It costs about $3,900 and takes three to four working days to install the CNG kit.

There are 51 car workshops approved by the Automobile Association of Singapore to install CNG kits.

Transport operators reeling from higher costs
Smaller companies streamline operations, cut fuel wastage in bid to stay afloat
Yang Huiwen, Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

Rocketing oil prices have squeezed much of the life out of smaller transport operators, with many now battling to stay afloat.

Much of the pain for these businesses - from car rental set-ups to bus operators and freight firms - boils down to the fact that the huge oil price hikes hit so fast, they had no time to prepare themselves or hedge their costs.

Some firms have seen operating costs rise anywhere from 10 to 30 per cent this year, cutting profit margins.

'For this period, we are not talking about profit; we are talking about staying afloat,' said Mr Louis Loh, sales manager of Loh Ghim Chong Transport, a 27-year-old firm with a fleet of 20 air-conditioned buses.

'Most of our long-term contracts bind us for at least 12 months. Now, we are very cautious about our pricing when renewing contracts,' he said.

Many companies first began to feel the heat after crude oil shot to US$100 (S$136) a barrel in early January this year, but prices have leapt by more than 30 per cent since then.

The pump price of diesel, which is used mainly by taxis, buses and light goods vehicles, is now about $1.80 a litre.

The diesel bill for one bus has almost doubled in two years, from $1,600 a month in 2006 to $3,000 now, Mr Loh said.

Mr V.S. Kumar, managing director of Network Express Courier Services, has seen fuel costs shoot up by 30 per cent in three months.

But the seemingly obvious solution - passing the costs on to customers - is resisted by many operators as they know that they have to stay competitive in an industry flooded with many players.

'If we try to raise the cost of our services, our clients will simply run away to another company,' said Ms Janice Yeong, operations manager of Berlington Services, a freight forwarding firm.

Many prefer to tackle the problem from a different angle - cutting costs. One way is to streamline operations and reduce fuel wastage by proper trip planning.

'We have informed staff to consolidate deliveries,' said Mr Kumar. 'So instead of delivering just two items to one place, I now wait for five items.'

Even some of Singapore's biggest companies - those with the ability to hedge against rising fuel costs - are not immune to sky-high prices.

Singapore Airlines (SIA), taxi operator ComfortDelGro and shipping company Neptune Orient Lines are some blue-chip businesses that have seen dents in profits and downgrades on their stocks.

Energy costs at ComfortDelGro, which operates Singapore's biggest taxi fleet, jumped 37.9 per cent in the first quarter compared with last year, sending profits down by 9.4 per cent to $50.2 million.

But commuters need not fear an increase in taxi and train fares just yet, as these are regulated by the Public Transport Council and capped by a fare-adjustment formula.

SIA estimates that it will incur an additional fuel cost of US$39 million for every US$1-a-barrel increase in jet fuel price, excluding any hedging of fuel purchases, said its spokesman.

Even with cost cutting and greater efficiency, the road ahead for transport firms looks bumpy, with analysts tipping that oil prices are likely to stay high given sustained global demand, tight supply and higher production costs.

That could spell high pump prices - and prolonged pain for the transport sector, the 'most obvious and directly impacted', said Action Economics economist David Cohen.

'People will be cutting back on rides in reaction to higher prices. It will be a double whammy for them,' he added.

Additional reporting by Gabriel Yue and Alvin Lim

Are retrofitted CNG vehicles safe?
Letter from Soh Ah Yuen, Sunday Times 15 Jun 08;

I refer to last Sunday's article, 'He owns 3 cars, all fitted with CNG kits'.

Compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles have been touted as clean and environment-friendly. Besides, they are also friendly to the pockets of car owners. All these have motivated motorists to think seriously about opting for CNG vehicles.

When this trend picks up steam, it may lead to a mushrooming of shops that would claim to specialise in retrofitting existing cars to run on CNG.

According to a picture in the article, the CNG tanks are stored in the boot.

I am concerned about the following:

# Should the retrofitted vehicle be rear-ended by, say, a truck and the tanks are damaged, what is the possibility of the vehicle becoming a fireball? Also, shouldn't such vehicles be required by law to carry fire extinguishers?

# Should the retrofitted vehicle be rear-ended by a vehicle, will the tanks protect the rear-seat passengers or aggravate their injuries?

# Will retrofitting shops be duly licensed by the authorities to ensure that the jobs are done by qualified persons?

I hope the Land Transport Authority will address these concerns before the use of CNG vehicles becomes widespread in Singapore.



Read more!

More Malaysian motorists switch to cheaper CNG

Straits Times 8 Jun 08;

Johor Baru - More motorists are switching to compressed natural gas (CNG) and converting their vehicles to run on the cheaper fuel.

Installation workshops are reporting better business, with operators working additional shifts to cope with the surge in demand.

Managing director Sharida Abd Samad, of Suria Professional Service Centre, said 20 vehicle owners had installed the kit on Thursday, a day after higher fuel prices came into effect.

The workshop usually fits about 30 cars monthly, but since the price hike, workers have had to work until 2am to cope with the additional demand, she said.

The New Straits Times daily reported another workshop - Perisind Auto Care - landing 14 orders in one day, which is more than what the company normally gets in a month.

Converting a vehicle to run on CNG costs at least RM2,900 (S$1,200), but owners stand to save in the long run.

CNG costs less than 70 Malaysian sen a litre. This is about a quarter the cost of the new price of petrol.

Lawyer Norman Fernandez said that he was considering converting his car to run on CNG, as it would save a lot of money in the long term.

'I was put off by the huge tank that will take up a lot of space in my car but, with the rise in petrol price, I am considering it,' The Star daily quoted him as saying.

Meanwhile, local fuel giant Petronas has said it will open 200 more stations to sell CNG, adding to its nearly 40 stations currently equipped with such facilities.

Many taxis around Malaysia already run on CNG, which the government is trying to promote as a cleaner, more environmentally friendly fuel.

The government actively supports its use with incentives and legislation, such as exempting conversion kits from import duty and sales tax.


Read more!

Chikungunya makes a comeback

Two cases in Teachers' Estate suggest that virus may have taken root even as NEA conducts a fresh blitz
Shuli Sudderuddin , Stacey Chia , Terence LeeStraits Times 8 Jun 08;

Mr Lau Gar Ning, 66, who lives in Teachers' Estate, heard the news yesterday that two cases of chikungunya fever had been found there.

The resident of the private housing estate, which is off Upper Thomson Road, is concerned about his resistance to the disease. He came down with dengue fever six months ago.

Chikungunya fever also surfaced here in Little India in January. It has since been contained there.

The mosquito-transmitted virus can be fatal, although it is usually not so.

In the Little India outbreak, the 13 victims had lived or worked there. Although all of them had contracted the ailment locally, some of the victims were foreigners. All have recovered.

But this new outbreak has sprung up in another location. And it looks as if the virus has been transmitted locally as well, because neither victim had travelled overseas recently. This raises some worry about the virus having taken root here.

The Ministry of Health (MOH) said that, with the two new cases, there were now 23 incidents of chikungunya this year.

It said that the virus had been detected once again on June 3, when a retiree, aged 86, visited a doctor. She was briefly hospitalised. A maid from the same household was diagnosed with the fever on June 5. Both are recuperating at home.

The MOH said that both had not travelled recently. A ministry spokesman said: 'Someone could have been bitten overseas, come back with the virus in his blood and been bitten by a mosquito, which went on to bite the two patients.'

The Government wants to prevent the virus from taking root locally, as it is not as well studied as dengue. Evidence has shown that the virus may have become more deadly.

Travellers may also bring the virus in. The Aedes mosquito, which transmits chikungunya, flourishes here.

Twenty officers from the National Environment Agency (NEA) have been in the area since June 5, inspecting every household and spraying the premises with insecticide.

So far, they have surveyed 150 households, including the 57 that make up Teachers' Estate. They have detected and destroyed 13 breeding sites. Those found to have harboured breeding sites will be fined $200.

Signs requesting inspection were put up on the doors of those who were not at home.

The NEA team will continue to inspect the estate and the nearby area until they have been declared free from the chikungunya virus.

MOH officers have also been screening residents and workers there since June 5.

When The Sunday Times visited the estate yesterday, it found a team of eight officers giving free blood tests to residents.

It takes about a day to process the samples.

A light downpour prompted a resident at 25, Li Po Avenue to offer the use of his porch for the health screening.

The retiree, who wanted to be known only as Mr Liew, said: 'I did this as a friendly gesture because I know quite a few of the neighbours.'

Meanwhile, Mr Lau, who lives in Kalidasa Avenue, has another worry.

'I'm quite worried about my daughter, who came to stay with us over the week. My wife has since tried calling her but we still haven't reached her,' the engineer said.

He added that his family was conscientious about keeping their house mosquito-free and would continue to do so.

Both the MOH and the NEA said that they could not comment on how big the problem was until they received the test results.

Anyone who has visited the Teachers' Estate recently and developed a fever should consult a doctor.


Read more!

Bottled water in Singapore: Sparkling, still or tap?

Not all eateries offer such a choice of water and some diners are outraged that only bottled water is served
Rebecca Lynne Tan, The New Paper 8 Jun 08;

Ask for tap water at classy restaurants such as Les Amis and Iggy's and the waiters don't bat an eyelid.

But dine at Secret Recipe, a chain of mid-priced cafes and you'll be forced to order bottled water to go with the meal.

And until two weeks ago, that was the case at the Bakerzin chain of cafes too.

Despite the fact that restaurants in other parts of the world are moving away from environmentally unfriendly bottled water, there are still some restaurants here which offer customers only bottled water.

Of the 50 restaurants LifeStyle surveyed, seven serve only bottled water, 40 will serve tap on request for free and three restaurants charge for tap water.

Profit margins seem to be at play here.

The chef-owner of a well-known restaurant in Singapore tells LifeStyle that restaurants usually have a 300 per cent markup on their products.

So while the cost price of a 750ml bottle of San Pellegrino water is about $2.20, most restaurants will sell it anywhere from $8 to $15 a bottle.

This practice has angered many diners. Why pay so much for bottled water when tap water is perfectly drinkable?

Teacher Rogayah Osman, 42, says: 'That's daylight robbery. It's unreasonable that they're incurring such high profits at the expense of the customers. Now that I know, I'm definitely going to boycott such restaurants.'

Senior debt consultant B.J. Tan, 38, says: 'My approach is never to patronise food establishments that serve only bottled water. I encourage my friends not to also.

'If I'm paying so much for food, why shouldn't I be served water?'

Undergraduate Stephen Fernandez, 24, says: 'If the restaurants refuse to serve me water, I wouldn't buy any beverages at all. It's my protest against the policy.

'Serving bottled water has a negative impact on the environment. The plastic has to be disposed of and plastic is non-biodegradable."

In spite of this, bottled water imports to Singapore have increased over the last five years, according to figures from the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority. In 2003, it was 89.4 million litres, then it hit a high of 171.8 million litres in 2005, before settling down to 154.5 million litres last year.

The water comes mainly from Malaysia, Indonesia, China, France and Taiwan.

But environmentalists say bottled water is a waste of resources and energy.

Mr Yatin Premchand, 31, general manager of the Singapore Environment Council (SEC), a non-profit organisation, says: 'The carbon footprint is approximately 20 times the size of that bottle. And it takes about 1,000 litres of fuel to make 1 litre of bottled water.'

The fuel is needed to make, transport and refrigerate water bottles, and burning that fuel releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

And it seems many restaurant managers LifeStyle spoke to are unaware of the environmental impact of bottled water. Some restaurants don't even recycle the bottles.

Mr Kana Rajaram, 35, manager of Cork Cellar Kitchen in Capital Tower, says: 'I wasn't aware of the environmental impact and our restaurant is not involved in any recycling projects. But I just took over and recycling is something I want to engage in.'

The council says Singaporeans need to be more environmentally aware about the need to recycle.

'We highlight it in educational campaigns. But what we should also do is support our local resources - drink local, eat local,' says Mr Premchand.

And Singapore's water is perfectly safe to drink.

According to PUB, the national water agency, Singapore's tap water is treated to a quality that exceeds the World Health Organisation's drinking water guidelines.

PUB conducts more than 80,000 tests on water quality each month and says tap water here is safe for drinking without the need for boiling or filtering.

But the Consumers Association of Singapore says serving tap water is based on goodwill.

Its executive director, Mr Seah Seng Choon, says: 'Legally speaking, a restaurant can charge consumers for tap water because it would have provided the tap water and the glass.'

Three of the 50 restaurants LifeStyle surveyed, including True Blue Cuisine in Armenian Street and Singapore Heritage Restaurant in Pagoda Street, charge for tap water. And Aston's Specialities, a Western food chain, serves customers boiled iced water, though the ice cubes are not made from boiled water. Prices at these places range from 30 cents to $1 for unlimited servings.

'We charge for water because we need to employ people to wash the glasses and water is not free. It helps to cover costs,' says Mr Benjamin Seck, 35, chef-owner of True Blue.

Other restaurants serve free water as a service, such as French eatery Andre Wine & Dine in Telok Ayer Street.

Its director, Ms Jacinta Weers, in her 40s, says: 'We serve customers iced or warm water as a standard operating procedure.'

Ms Janice Wong, 40, director of Iggy's at The Regent Singapore, says: 'We've been brought up to drink tap water and Singapore's tap water is perfectly drinkable. It doesn't cost us anything to serve it and when we ask customers what they'd like to drink, we typically ask 'Iced water or mineral water?''

Yet many restaurants which do serve tap water will often do so only if customers specifically request it. Their waiters are told to offer diners still or sparkling mineral water as a matter of course.

Ms Deedee Daud, 29, operations and events manager at Au Petit Salut, a French restaurant in Harding Road, says: 'It's called suggestive selling. It's about helping us, but if they ask for tap water, we will oblige.'

Data on bottled water far-fetched
Letter from Maximilian Png, Sunday Times 15 Jun 08;

In last Sunday's article, 'Sparkling, still or tap?', Mr Yatin Premchand, general manager of the Singapore Environment Council, said that 'it takes about 1,000 litres of fuel to make 1 litre of bottled water'.

The price of 1litre of bottled water is about $2. The price of 1,000 litres of fuel is around $1,272. Who would sell bottled water at an astronomical loss of $1,270 a bottle?

I have nothing against drinking tap water - I do that all the time. I just feel that the figure given was rather improbable.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 7 Jun 08


Sentosa walk with the Naked Hermit Crabs
on the adventures with the naked hermit crabs

"See Our Shores in a New Light"
an exhibition, on the adventures with the naked hermit crabs blog

All stars concert at Changi
a galaxy of stars on the wonderful creations blog

More Changi marine life
on the wonderful creations blog

Views of Chek Jawa
by visitors from Bukit Batok on the adventures with the naked hermit crabs blog

TeamSeagrass at Cyrene Reef
on the teamseagrass blog

Cyrene snippets
on the budak blog of star skin and frogfish.

Singapore nature spots
by a young blogger on the nature walks blog

Eurasian Sparrowhawk: Courtship and nesting
on the bird ecology blog


Read more!

Sharing secrets of shore life: the Naked Hermit Crabs

Tiffany Fumiko Tay, Straits Times 7 Jun 08;

MOST Singaporeans don't know it, but if they waded out to ankle-depth waters offshore, they would encounter a world teeming with marine life.

So says environmental volunteer group Naked Hermit Crabs, which got its name because 'like hermit crabs without shells, our shores are fragile without nature lovers to protect them', says Ivan Kwan, a pioneering member.

The Crabs, consisting of about 20 students and working professionals, formed last June and is holding a three-day exhibition ending tomorrow at the National Library, called The Naked Truth: See Our Shores In A New Light.

The exhibition, the group's first major one, showcases pictures of the marine life that members have come across along local shores. The members will also give a public talk today.
WHO'S CRABBY NOW?: The Naked Hermit Crabs volunteers included (clockwise from left) Jerald Tang, 19, Ivan Kwan, 26, Sundra Gaytri Merlange, 23, Wong Ley Kun, 46, and Noor Ervyna Mohd Sani, 28.
-- ST PHOTO: LIM WUI LIANG


Amazingly, the photos - their eye-catching subjects include seahorses, clownfish and a species of starfish called the knobbly seastar - were all taken at ankle-deep waters during low tide, not on underwater dives.

'People watch TV documentaries on what's going on in other parts of the world, but they don't know what we have in our own backyard,' declares Kwan.

The 25-year-old trainee teacher with the National Institute of Education recalls: 'I have a friend who saw a picture we took of an anemone shrimp and said, 'I went all the way to Manado in Indonesia to photograph that shrimp and you tell me you shot it at Changi beach?'.'

Some of the pictures were even shot at Sentosa, which most people see as a tourist area with man-made beaches, he says.

'There's a natural beach there that seems like nothing but a pile of rocks, but there are a lot of surprises to be found.'

The Crabs conduct public excursions to beaches here and to neighbouring Singapore islands. These free guided walks are held several times a month, when the tide is low enough to see the creatures. While costs were previously absorbed by members, the group now has the backing of eyewear company Transitions Optical.

Kwan and his fellow Hermit Crabs' passion for marine life stemmed from when they visited local beaches as children.

'Some of those who are working take all their annual leave to go exploring and conduct the excursions,' he says.

The passion of a few is not enough, he says.

'We need to enlist help to address threats such as abandoned fishing lines and nets which trap the creatures, as well as poachers who take so much fish and crabs for consumption that it's not sustainable, and even seahorses and coral for aquariums.'

While Mr Kwan says group members would love to keep the beaches their own little secret, 'wonderful things must be shared'.

Creating awareness of this marine life is a double-edged sword though, as it also alerts poachers, he adds.

'But the more people who know about our marine life, the more eyes of nature lovers there will be to keep poachers away.'

# The Naked Truth: See Our Shores In A New Light exhibition is on until tomorrow at The National Library Plaza in North Bridge Road. The public talk will be held there today at 3pm. Admission is free.

# Visit nakedhermitcrabs.blogspot.com for more information on the Naked Hermit Crabs and guided walks.

Links to more information


Read more!

Why cut down a healthy 17-year-old tree?

Tan May Ping, The New Paper 7 Jun 08;

FOR 17 years, the mango tree grew undisturbed.

But now, it is at the centre of a conflict between a shopowner and the Management Corporation (MC) of an estate in Simpang Bedok.

Mr Gabriel Tan, 52, is trying to prevent the MC of Bedok Shopping Complex from cutting down the tree.

He feels they have not given a good reason to do so.

The MC's lawyers recently sent a letter to Mr Tan demanding that he 'immediately cease and desist from hindering or otherwise obstructing' the contractor from felling the tree.

The MC is made up of owners - elected at the annual general meeting (AGM) - who run the estate, while Kenwood Property Consultants is the estate's managing agent.

On 17 May, Mr Tan said a worker approached him in his shop and asked him to remove his pickup, which was parked under the tree.

He said he saw some workers with a chainsaw, and it then dawned on him that they wanted to cut down the tree.

'When I realised what they were going to do, I refused to move my vehicle,' said Mr Tan, who is authorised to speak and act on behalf of his father, who is the owner.

Mr Tan has run his audio equipment business there for 12 years.

He said he was told by the MC that the owner of the private house next to the tree had complained that the leaves were falling into his backyard.

The police were called in, and it was decided that the tree should not be cut down until clarification was sought from the National Parks Board (NParks). The contractors left after an hour, said Mr Tan.

He then went on the Internet and found Mr Joseph Lai, who is actively involved in the conservation of trees.

He contacted Mr Lai to ask for advice on how to handle the issue.

Mr Lai, a trained botanist, told The New Paper he inspected the tree and found that it was 'perfectly healthy' and posed no danger.

Mr Tan sent faxes to the managing agent appealing to them not to cut down the tree.

Then, on 31 May, he got a shock when he received a lawyer's letter threatening legal action if he continued to hinder the removal of the tree.

The letter said the MC had approved the felling of the tree by a majority vote, and had obtained the necessary clearance from NParks.

But when contacted, an NParks spokesman said its approval is not required as the tree is in a private compound, and not within a tree conservation area or on vacant land.

When contacted by The New Paper, the MC chairman declined comment.

The estate, which is also known as Bedok Market Place, consists of shophouses and a central marketplace.

The owner of the private house next to the tree said he was surprised that the management had decided to remove the tree.

The retiree, who declined to be named, said the tree had not been pruned for three years and was getting 'heavy on top'.

He said he had not asked for the tree to be cut down, adding: 'Last October, I asked the MC to prune the tree. That's not the same as felling the tree.

'We have overhead electricity cables and if the branches fall on the cables, we would have no electricity until they are repaired.'

Mr Tan said several businesses do not want to get involved, but gave him their support.

One of them, a restaurant owner in his 40s who did not want to give his name, said it would be a waste to cut the tree down.

He said: 'It gives joy to many people. During our breaks, we like to sit outside under the shade of the tree.

'The tree also bears so much fruit and you can see the smile on people's faces when they pluck the fruits.'

Mr Tan said he would bring the matter up at an upcoming AGM.


Read more!

Smaller steps to a better fin-ish?

Letter from Peter Tan, Today Online 7 Jun 08;

I READ with dismay the commentary by Liang Dingzi “Of sharks’ fins and high rollers” (June 5). While the writer applauds Resorts World at Sentosa (RWS) for its decision to take sharks’ fin off its menu, he poisons his praise by calling RWS’s decision to serve high-rollers “hypocritical”.

Liang Dingzi does not see the wood for the trees. I say far better for companies to take smaller steps than expect each one to go all the way.

We should celebrate that 90 per cent of sharks’ fin will not be consumed at RWS, rather than lament the10 per cent that may be. In the end, the number of bowls of the delicacy consumed by high rollers at RWS will pale in comparison to the thousands served at wedding dinners acrossSingapore.

Let’s have local hotels follow RWS’s example and take sharks’ fin off their wedding banquet menus, for supermarkets not to stock shark fins, and, dare I add, for media companies not to publish advertisements that promote sharks’ fin menus and products.

One man’s foie gras is another man’s poison
Letter from Teo Puay Kim, Today Online 7 Jun 08;

I REFER to “Of sharks’ fins and high rollers” (June 5) by Liang Dingzi.

I would like to propose the banning of the French delicacy foie gras in Singapore.

We should be writing to all French restaurants to remove this distasteful dish that involves a high level of cruelty to ducks and geese.

Foie gras is French for “fatty liver” or the liver of a duck or goose that has been fattened by force feeding.

Chicago and California have already banned foie gras.

The following can be found on the Wikipedia website: “Animal rights and welfare groups such as Peta, Farm Sanctuary andHumane Society of the United States contend that foie gras: production methods, and force feeding in particular, constitute cruel and inhumane treatment of animals.

“Specific complaints include liver swollen to many times their normal size, impaired liver function, expansion of the abdomen making it difficult for birds to walk, death if the force feeding is continued, and scarring of the esophagus.

“Peta also claims that the insertion and removal of the feeding tube scratch the throat and the esophagus, causing irritations and wounds and thus exposing the animal to risk of mortal infections.”

Liang Dingzi is right. Compassion is not a tradeable commodity :—: we should be fair to the ducks and geese as well.


Read more!

Amid the business and science of water, a splash of fun

Lin Yanqin, Today Online 7 Jun 08;

BEYOND the new technologies to be introduced, deals to be struck and issues to be discussed, there will also be a chance to enjoy the resource that is the focus of Singapore International Water Week (SIWW).

Apart from programmes for the delegates, members of the public will get to participate in activities such as kayaking, dragon boating, free banana boat rides and water-skiing performances on June 26, as part of SIWW’s Water Festival.

Said Mr Yap Kheng Guan, director of the Public Utilities Board’s 3P Network Department: “There are opportunities for the industry, but there are also opportunities for the man on the street to be part of it.”

He hopes that once involved in the festivities, the public will appreciate the level of water management needed to create an environment conducive to such activities.

“You see this beautiful body of water, where people can have fun because the water level is stable, it’s clean and calm,” said Mr Yap. “It reflects how we have managed our water.”

Added Mr Michael Toh, general manager of SIWW: “The global water crisis is a serious issue, but at the same time we want people to enjoy and appreciate the water resources we have ... and remind Singaporeans our water bodies and waterways are worth preserving and protecting.”

More than 5,000 delegates from20 countries are expected to attend the inaugural SIWW. Overwhelming response meant that another 2,000 square metres of exhibition space have had to be added.

“I think we have a very interesting, comprehensive mix of events, and people see the opportunities,” said Mr Yap.


Read more!