Best of our wild blogs: 3 Jan 11


Job opportunity: Laboratory Officer @ TMSI, 1-year contract
from The Biodiversity crew @ NUS

Starting off 2011 with Seagrass Monitoring at Chek Jawa!
from Diary of a Boy wandering through Our Little Urban Eden

Sweltering hot at Chek Jawa
from Psychedelic Nature

TeamSeagrass at Chek Jawa
from teamseagrass

Monkey Walks!
from Crystal and Bryan in Singapore

Mangroves at Chek Jawa
from wild shores of singapore

Blog Log: 19 December 2010
from Pulau Hantu

Agrionoptera insignis , Agrionoptera sexlineata
from Creatures Big & Small

First Semakau Walk in 2011: Nice fiddler crabs
from PurpleMangrove

Christmas Eve on Big Sister's Island
from Nature's Wonders

100102 Mesida?
from Singapore Nature

Monday Morgue: 3rd January 2011
from The Lazy Lizard's Tales


Read more!

Singapore: 6.5m people, more or less?

We should, like Hong Kong, have an official population projection
Letter from Ng Ya Ken Today Online 3 Jan 11;

THE Government has yet to announce any official population projection for the next few decades, although it has been using a 6.5 million population parameter for physical planning for the next 30 to 40 years. It has repeatedly said that the 6.5 million figure is not a target.

In contrast, Hong Kong's Census and Statistical Office frequently updates its population forecast, with the latest one made in July last year, showing that its 7 million population in 2009 would expand to 8.89 million by 2039.

Why does Hong Kong - with a fertility rate lower than ours - want to tell the world that its population will expand by 27 per cent over the next 30 years?

One of the purposes is to convince the world that it has an expanding workforce to meet the need of economic growth for the next three decades - as a tool for boosting business confidence and attracting foreign investments in a territory where local the population is declining.

It also shows that the Hong Kong authorities are not avoiding the hard questions on immigration issues, since future population growth will have to rely solely on immigration. It also serves as a reminder to the locals to face up to the unavoidable reality of having to work and live with more immigrants in future years.

The Hong Kong release, which shows forecasts at five-year intervals till 2039, can be used for not only urban planning but also for planning in education, health and other social services.

Businesses can also use it to plan their investments, especially those that depend on the mass market or take longer to fully reap the profits.

Should we not do the same as Hong Kong, so that a common population forecast and its accompanying assumptions can be used for planning purposes among the various ministries in the Government?

In projecting long-term population figures, we are forced to take a harder look at factors and possible scenarios affecting not only population growth but also economic growth and other aspects of our future.

Population projection can be a very profound, deep-thinking and forward-looking process, from which we as a nation can learn many valuable things.

The Government should not be unduly concerned about how the people will react to the projection as long as it is conducted with the nation's best interests being placed as the ultimate goal.


Read more!

Malaysia: Stop killing the crocodile, plead wildlife activists

Nigel Edgar and Sharin Shaik The Star 3 Jan 11;

KUCHING: Villagers have vowed to continue their hunt for a crocodile that killed and devoured a man here, even if they have to kill “each and every last one” in the Batang Samarahan River.

Their pledge, however, has earned them the wrath of environmentalists and wildlife groups.

Malaysian Nature Society chairman Asso Prof Maketab Mohamed said although human life was sacred, it did not mean that it was all right to kill crocodiles “as if their lives were worthless”.

The villagers have so far caught and disembowelled three crocodiles since Sidi Samad, 66, was seen eaten alive on Dec 18.

Prof Maketab urged the authorities not to go “hunting blindly” unless they were sure that they had found the killer crocodile.

Environmentalist Anthony Sebastian said the killings should stop because it was not the crocodile’s fault.

“When humans live close to nature, there is bound to be conflict with wildlife.

“So, it is only natural for the animals to fend for themselves, and in this case, for the crocodile to kill,” he said.

Anthony advised the authorities to stop the killings but appease the villagers at the same time.

“It is a tough job for the authorities but they should be responsible,” he said.

Village head Awang Kanong Awang Alim said the man-eater must be found and killed because it had committed a “sin” against the people by taking Sidi’s life.

He realised that wildlife authorities might not be pleased with them for killing the protected reptile but he said the villagers had no choice but to find the killer crocodile.

“We have been living near this river for a long time. The river is where we earn our living,” he said.

The hunt will stop when the villagers find evidence of Sidi’s remains in the belly of a crocodile.

However, not all the villagers agree with the killings.

One of them, who wanted to be known only as Mohai, said: “They cannot kill every crocodile in the river. It’s a protected reptile.”

Mohai said the authorities should catch crocodiles living near populated areas and relocate them to a habitat far from people.


Read more!

Indonesia: Forest Concessions to Be Granted in Logged Land

Elisabeth Oktofani Jakarta Globe 2 Jan 11;

The Forestry Ministry has announced that 500,000 hectares of land concessions will be granted this year in previously logged areas as part of a wider plan to keep virgin forests intact and slow the rate of carbon dioxide emissions.

Hadi Daryanto, the ministry’s director general of forestry management, said on Thursday that opening these concessions in so-called degraded forests would ensure that natural and peat forests remained untouched.

“Indonesia has 35.4 million hectares of degraded forest that we can designate as agricultural and forest concessions,” he said.

“By using degraded forests instead of virgin forests, we can develop more concessions and keep emissions low, as well as providing jobs in the forestry sector.”

The government sells permits each year to use publicly owned land for specific purposes such as agriculture, logging and mining. Prices for such concessions vary depending on the land’s location and intended use. The concessions are handed out throughout the year.

Last year, 487,744 hectares of such concessions came from degraded forests, surpassing the Forestry Ministry’s target of 450,000 hectares.

Hadi said reusing previously logged land was part of the government’s plan to suspend the issuance of new concessions in peat and primary natural forests.

The moratorium is part of a bilateral deal with Norway that went into effect on Saturday, the first day of 2011. In return for the moratorium, Norway will provide $1 billion in funding for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD-Plus) schemes.

“Besides implementing the Indonesia-Norway agreement, we can also use this to attain our national emissions reduction target of 26 percent by 2020,” Hadi said. “At the same time, it gives the ministry a role in helping to achieve the GDP growth target of 7 percent by 2014.”

He said the target for new concessions this year was up from 2010 because of an increased demand for wood pulp.

“Even though there’s rising demand for wood pulp, and hence for forest concessions, we’ve already mapped out the projected concessions so there’s no possibility of clearing natural or peat forests,” he said.

Hadi also said that because the issuance of land concessions was a lucrative business, the government was concerned about parties posing as brokers for investors seeking permits.

“We need a monitoring team to supervise the implementation of the moratorium on new concessions in peat and natural forests,” he said.

Mas Achmad Santosa, an environmental law expert, said the effective implementation of the moratorium could only be ensured with firm legal support.

“It will take some time before the government issues a policy as the legal instrument to back the moratorium,” he said.

“Therefore it’d be better if the president issued a decree on implementing the moratorium.”

Mas said that besides the lack of a legal foundation, the moratorium was threatened by the prospect of regional administrations not acting in line with the central government’s logging policy.

“One thing we need to be concerned about is the possibility of regional administrations issuing their own concessions in natural and peat forests,” he said.

“With regional autonomy now in place, regional administrations are under pressure to raise their own income.”


Read more!

South Korea clamps down on illegal whale-hunting

Yahoo News 2 Jan 11;

SEOUL (AFP) – South Korea said Sunday it will tighten rules on whaling and the processing of whale meat amid international pressure to curb illegal hunting of the endangered giant mammals.

The agriculture ministry said the new rules, to take effect on Monday, will require fishermen to report to police immediately discoveries of whales trapped in their nets or washed ashore.

Those who claim to have caught dead whales will be required by law to process and sell them only at state-designated facilities, and only those with state permits will be allowed to trade whale meat.

DNA samples of dead whales should be submitted to authorities as demanded by the International Whaling Commission (IWC), so that the government can trace origins of the animals, the ministry said.

The new law is aimed at helping to curb a "growing amount of illegal whale hunting" around the country, it said.

South Korea has banned whaling for commercial sale since 1986 but allows trading of those accidentally caught dead in fishing nets on washed up dead onshore.

But the incidence of accidental fishing of whales has surged in recent years, drawing suspicion from IWC member nations, the ministry said.

Some fishermen illegally catch whales and process the meat onboard before arriving at the port in an attempt to dodge government the clampdown, local media have reported.


Read more!

A Diet for an Invaded Planet: Invasive Species

James Gorman New York Times 31 Dec 10;

There’s a new shift in the politics of food, not quite a movement yet, more of an eco-culinary frisson. But it may have staying power; the signs and portents are there. Vegans, freegans, locavores — meet the invasivores.

Some divers in the Florida Keys recently held a lionfish derby, the idea being to kill and eat lionfish, an invasive species. Local chefs cooperated by promoting the lionfish as a tasty entree. The idea drew editorial support from Andrew Revkin in a post on The Times’s Dot Earth blog in which he also mentioned an attempt by some fisheries biologists to rename the invading Asian carp “Kentucky tuna” to make it more appealing to diners. And the Utne Reader recently ran an article about Chicago chefs turning their attention to the same invasive fish.

The rumblings go further back, of course, as rumblings always do. The idea of eating kudzu and the recipes for it have been around for decades. More recently, at the beginning of 2009, a San Francisco blogger on matters ecological, animal and political, Rachel Kesel, posted a nicely turned argument for the “invasive species diet.”

Ms. Kesel, who grew up with a father who hunted deer, is now a vegetarian, but she included animals as well as plants in her proposed diet. She said in an interview that she was studying in London when she wrote the post, which grew out of conversations about diet and ecology. “If you really want to get down on conservation you should eat weeds,” she decided. And so she blogged.

She now works for the parks department of San Francisco and said she did indeed pursue the vegetable side of the diet she proposed. “I’m really looking forward to some of our spring weeds here,” she said, notably Brassica rapa, also known as field mustard or turnip mustard.

Ms. Kesel has a flair for the kind of rhetoric that any movement needs. “I’m almost serious here,” she concluded her diet post. “Eat for the environment. Eat locally. Eat wild meat. Eat for habitat. Eat invasive.”

Jackson Landers, unlike Ms. Kesel, is completely serious. As the Locavore Hunter, based in Virginia, he teaches urbanites how to hunt and butcher deer. He has branched out from the locavore life to invasives, and lionfish are one target. But as he has pushed the envelope of the invasivore approach, he has hunted and eaten feral pigs, two species of iguana, armadillos, starlings, pigeons and resident Canada geese. He says that all of these activities will be chronicled in a book, “Eating Aliens,” and perhaps a television show as well.

Mr. Landers, who grew up in a vegetarian household, taught himself to hunt. He believes that eating invasives can have a real effect. “When human beings decide that something tastes good, we can take them down pretty quickly,” he said. Our taste for passenger pigeon wiped that species out, he said. What if we developed a similar taste for starlings?

I was pleased to see Canada geese and pigeons included in his list, because in the Northeast, neophyte invasivores face some unappetizing possibilities, like the zebra mussel (too little meat and too much salmonella) and the unpleasant and unwanted freshwater algae, Didymosphenia geminata, commonly called didymo, or, with absolutely no trace of affection, rock snot.

I don’t see the beginning of a menu there. But if we broaden the definition of invasives to include the things that invade the average suburbanite’s yard and golf course, a world of possibilities open up — deer, raccoons, opossums, squirrels, skunks, rabbits and woodchucks.

You do have to find a way to kill them before you eat them, but perhaps you have, as I do, a woodchuck-killing dog. Then it’s just a question of not wasting perfectly good meat. I even found a good woodchuck recipe that can also be used for rabbit. Naturally, it was invented by a gardener. As for vegetables, I suggest Japanese knotweed. I have an endless supply, if you’re having company over and find yourself a bit short.

The movement will, of course, need the support of cooks and eaters as well as hunters and environmentalists, but I see that happening already. Witness the request for a good python recipe on Chowhound. Among the comments, some downright disrespectful, was this, which I take to be a sign that Mr. Landers and Ms. Kesel are on the right track: “We usually cook alligator and snake in an étouffée.”

Why, of course.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 2 Jan 11


Re-Discovery of the Detached Dart
from Butterflies of Singapore

Magnificent Monitors
from Celebrating Singapore's BioDiversity! and Busting Myths about Monitors

The Spider Temple
from Macro Photography in Singapore

Happy 2011 from Venus Drive
from wonderful creation

Stork-billed kingfisher @ Japanese garden鹳嘴翠鸟
from PurpleMangrove

More mangroves at Kranji in the New Year
from wild shores of singapore


Read more!

Transit towards a greener, more accessible system

Grace Chua Straits Times 2 Jan 11;

Singapore's transport successes are well known, but its transport system could be greener, with easier access for the old and infirm.

A new study of urban transport in 15 cities, conducted by consulting firm Accenture, came to that conclusion about Singapore and what it terms as fellow 'laboratory' cities, such as Seoul in South Korea.

Such cities already use effective solutions, such as congestion charges and car-pooling incentives, but they can go even further, said Accenture managing partner Lee Won Joon.

He oversaw the Asian segment of the study, which looked at a wide range of cities picked for their different sizes, stages of development and locations.

The study will be used for Accenture projects on urbanisation and intelligent cities - urban centres which use technology to cut energy consumption, become more sustainable and respond faster to residents' needs.

Mr Lee pointed out Singapore's successes in using congestion charges and cutting down the car population with quota schemes, and acknowledged its attempts to beef up its public transport network.

But Singapore's population is burgeoning and commuters' expectations are higher, he said.

The popular sentiment is that roads are crowded with too many cars, while buses are too slow and trains too crowded or infrequent.

Last year, customer satisfaction with public transport fell, according to the annual Customer Satisfaction Index by Singapore Management University's Institute of Service Excellence.

Also, transport should be made more environmentally friendly - not just by cutting back on the number of private cars, but also by improving on public transport.

In Mr Lee's native Seoul, for example, most public buses run on natural gas, whereas many here run on diesel.

National University of Singapore transport researcher Lee Der Horng supported the use of clean-energy public transport, and suggested that Singapore aim for large scale shared-access electric vehicle (EV) schemes rather than personal EVs.

The MRT Circle Line has already received a Green Mark for Rapid Transit Systems, for its use of braking systems which reuse energy and other measures.

The Green Mark framework will assess the environmental friendliness of MRT lines such as the Downtown Line, the first stage of which is set to open in 2013.

Researchers also felt that transport measures must be properly integrated with urban planning.

For example, the Accenture report noted that parking restrictions in the city centre sometimes cause businesses to move out to the suburbs.

Sometimes this is done as part of a deliberate strategy to develop or rejuvenate an area. For example, the National Development and the Environment and Water Resources ministries will move to the Jurong Gateway area by 2015, along with the agencies under them.

As for park-and-ride schemes, an Asian Development Bank (ADB) report in November last year on Asian cities' parking policies pointed out that such facilities were often built in high-density places 'where park-and-ride is unlikely to be a cost-effective use of high-value space near mass transit'.

But in Singapore, many park-and-ride carparks are in residential areas, where they share space with residential carparks that would otherwise be empty in the daytime, the ADB report said.

However, Accenture's Mr Lee suggested that Singapore faces a 'last mile' problem with both commuters and delivery services, exacerbated by its climate.

For example, due to the hot climate, commuters are far more willing to use the MRT train if they do not have to walk too far to the station. Those who live 800m from a station take half of their trips by car on average, whereas those who live less than 200m from the MRT travel by car only a quarter of the time.

But even if transport gets greener and more convenient, said Mr Lee, the question remains: who pays?

Whether the Government finances public transport, or operators bear the cost or pass it on to consumers, there is no easy answer.

Professor Lee from NUS is in favour of government help or incentives for newer or greener buses, such as hybrid buses.

'The Government should take the lead and compose a mechanism to help or subsidise the operators,' he said.

In Hong Kong, the MTR metro network has a novel financing model: it has the rights for developing land next to train stations.

The revenue that it gets from property activities helps to fund its rail infrastructure projects, so the costs are not borne by taxpayers or commuters alone.

Such transit-oriented models should be a key part of urban planning, said researchers like Prof Lee.

When it comes to planning and improving infrastructure, 'public transport should undoubtedly enjoy the highest and clearest priority compared to private modes', he said.


Read more!

Fewer people caught littering on New Year's Eve

Evelyn Choo Channel NewsAsia 1 Jan 11;

SINGAPORE : Fewer people were caught littering on New Year's Eve compared to the previous year.

National Environment Agency (NEA) officers were on the prowl for litterbugs islandwide. At the end of their blitz on Friday night, 74 littering tickets were issued, down almost 40 per cent from last year's figure of 116.

During NEA's Orchard Road blitz, the first culprit nabbed turned out to be a tourist, who was let off with a warning.

Otherwise, first-time offenders could be fined S$300 for throwing items like sweet wrappers and cigarette butts. Larger items like food wrappers and drink cups warrant a higher penalty of S$1,000, plus a Corrective Work Order.

At the stroke of midnight at Orchard Road, people unleashed spray cans of foam and confetti everywhere. Cleaning companies were given the tight deadline of cleaning the area by Saturday morning.

The NEA said it does not generally take action against those who use party spray cans during festive periods, but asked that the items be disposed of properly.

At the end of the Orchard Road blitz, eight people were caught.

Teh Chun Siong, manager of operations at National Environment Agency, said: "Most people are taking more responsibility not to litter this year; they are continuing to keep the environment clean and green.

"NEA also worked with event organisers to put in more additional workers to keep the place clean and empty bins throughout the event."

With more workers on shift on Friday night, cleaning contractors got busy right after the partying.

Alia Jiffry, public relations officer at Purechem Veolia Environmental Services, said: "(The items included) cans, bottles, tissue paper. But the most challenging for us are the planted areas, because our workers have to go there and dig up all the litter."

By 6am, refuse collected in Orchard Road amounted to 2.8 tonnes, significantly less than the 3.7 tonnes collected last year.

- CNA/ms

After the big party, it's the big clean-up
However, less litter this year for cleaners of New Year countdown mess
Lester Kok Straits Times 3 Jan 11;

FOR many people, the New Year countdown marked not only the close of 2010 but also the end of the night's partying.

For those responsible for cleaning up, however, it was just the start of a hectic working day.

At 2am on Saturday, Orchard Road was strewn with drink cans, disposable cups, cigarette butts, confetti and party poppers.

Just two hours later, almost all the evidence that a party had taken place had vanished as if by magic.

This was not just down to the efficiency of the cleaners.

Partygoers also appeared to have helped by dropping less litter than last year.

In Orchard Road, 2.6 tonnes of rubbish was collected on Saturday, a third less than the 3.67 tonnes collected after the 2009 countdown party.

It was also less than half of the six tonnes collected after the Christmas Eve celebrations two weeks earlier.

Even before the party officially ended at 2am, janitors from Purechem Veolia Environmental Services, the company responsible for keeping Orchard Road spick and span, had already started work.

They picked and swept up litter, emptied and cleaned the bins, and drove sweeper vans to clean the roads.

Cleaners from Veolia were seen cycling around on tricycles with carts of trash bags, cleaning out bins one by one throughout the wee hours.

By 3am, almost all traces of litter were gone, except for a few strands of confetti and the odd party popper.

At 4am, workers with water jets started scouring the last remaining bits of dirt from the streets.

Efficiency is key to a clean Singapore, but the janitors The Straits Times spoke to said having less litter helped too.

The supervisor in charge of housekeeping for Ngee Ann City and its Civic Plaza, who gave his name only as Andrew, was surprised there was much less litter.

'Last year, we had all four rubbish bins (dumpster type) full of rubbish, but this year, we have only half a bin,' said the 26-year-old.

Having more hands also helped.

The National Environment Agency (NEA) worked with event organisers to put in extra workers to clean and empty bins.

While the main party was over by 2am, there was a smaller event going on at *Scape organised for 14- to 25-year-olds.

Named 'Get the Funk Out 2010/2011', it was attended by about 3,000 partygoers and went on until 4am.

When the lights were turned on, confetti whistles and empty drink cans were seen lying on the ground.

However, organisers said it was not that much litter when you consider how many items were handed out.

Miss Althea Lim, project manager from The Youth Empire - a private organisation known for youth-oriented events - said it had earlier given the crowd about 3,000 cans of drink, 6,000 lightsticks, party poppers and whistles.

Miss Lim still felt that 'Singapore has a pretty serious problem on littering', compared to countries such as Australia where people are more civic-minded.

However, the littering problem does seem to be improving.

On Friday night, NEA issued 74 littering tickets in the whole of Singapore - 36 per cent less than the 116 in 2009. At Orchard Road, only eight tickets were issued during the enforcement blitz from 9pm to 11pm.

Mr Wilson Ang, founder of Environmental Challenge Organisation (ECO) Singapore, agreed that people were becoming more conscious of the environment.

He said education efforts such as ECO's Dunk It! Programme and the work of other non-governmental organisations such as WaterWays Watch Society, 'are beginning to pay off', adding: 'You can see people holding on to their trash consciously and placing it in the litter bins around them.'


Read more!

Langkawi: Filled with natural wonders

The Star 1 Jan 11;

LANGKAWI is the only place in the country to spot the Mountain Hawk Eagle and Brown Winged Kingfisher and it is the easiest place in Malaysia to see the Wreathed Hornbill, Great Hornbill and Oriental Pied Hornbill.

Naturist and birding enthusiast Irshad Mobarak said that on Gunung Raya, avid bird watchers were guaranteed to catch a glimpse of the hornbills on any given day.

“There are 10 hornbill species in Kedah,” he said, adding that five years ago, an astonishing 142 Great Hornbills were seen at one location, creating a national record for Langkawi.

He said Langkawi boasted more than 226 species of birds and in the last decade, was popular among bird watchers from Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, England and Scandinavia.

Of the world’s 54 hornbill species, some 20% can be found in Malaysia.

“In Langkawi, you can find low-land forests, mangrove swamps and wetlands within minutes of each other,” he said.

“Because of the diverse landscape, you have myriad birds and creatures.

“That is why it is important for us to conserve Langkawi’s nature — our full tourism potential has yet to be realised.”

Irshad, who has been conducting birding and nature tours for the last 20 years, said mangrove river tours at the Kilim Geo-Forest Park is a “must-do” for nature lovers.

“Two decades ago, I was among the pioneer group who started bird watching tours here. Then, there was only one long tail boat to ferry passengers but now there are more than 100 fibreglass ones zooming past.”

He cited speeding boats as a major threat to the ecology as they caused soil erosion.

There are about 55 mangrove tree species in the world and more than 26 species can be found in Langkawi.

“It’s heartbreaking when the tide is low and you can see how much of the mangrove roots are exposed due to erosion. The carrying capacity for tourists aboard boats must be regulated,” Irshad said.

He said regulations were needed to ensure that boat and tour operators were respectful of nature and mindful of the destruction they could cause.

Irshad said the mangrove river where the Hollywood blockbuster ‘Anna and The King’ was filmed was “the most beautiful coastal river in Malaysia”.

“This is an unbeatable world-class attraction but we need to make it sustainable so the locals will continue to benefit for generations to come,” he said.

“Nowhere else have I seen such a scenic landscape of 450-year-old limestone forests and many diverse plants along one river ride.”

Otters and water monitors are common sightings.

“The Bryde’s Whale and Pink Dolphins in the open sea were sometimes seen back in the day but with the many boats now, they have rarely been spotted,” he said, adding that Langkawi had more than 500 butterflies species.

“We will lose all of these precious attractions if we fail to protect our natural habitat,” he warned.

The dollars and sense of going green
The Star 1 Jan 11;

RUNNING an eco-friendly resort makes “perfect business sense”, an environmentalist and entrepreneur says.

By 2030, businesses that are not green will not be able to survive, The Frangipani Langkawi Resort and Spa owner Anthony Wong said.

“In the next 20 years, our natural resources will be gone and you will be out of business if you don’t practise sustainability,” he said.

“You can make money if you are eco-friendly because tourists these days are willing to pay more to help conserve Mother Nature,” he said.

Wong, who is also the managing director of Asian Overland Services (AOS), a tourism and hospitality group of companies specialising in eco-tourism activities, said it would cost more in the initial stages to run a green hotel but it would be cheaper in the long run.

“Your initial investment may be about 20% more and you’ll need more staff but at the end of the day, the profits justify the effort and you are doing your part to help save the environment,” he explained.

“Langkawi has about 90,000 inhabitants and 2.5 million visitors yearly – the main benefactors are the locals because 90% of the population depends on the tourism industry to survive,” he added.

Recycling and energy-saving are practised at Wong’s resort at Pantai Tengah.

He relies on the wetland system to treat sewage and waste water.

The water treatment system uses plants to turn stinky, dirty sewage into clean water,” he said.

“The first step is to identify the main pollutants in the water which we channel into a pond near the resort.

“Next step is to find the most suitable plants that can soak up the pollutants.

“I took three years to find the perfect combination of plants that could effectively treat the water,” he said.

Wong uses the water mimosa, thalia genicula, water hyacinth, water lily, water vetiver and water spinach at his pond.

Laboratory tests have shown that the treated water from the pond is of grade A quality.

“You can actually drink the water once it goes through the ultraviolet light and water filtering process although we only use the treated water for cleaning and watering the plants.

“At least 45% of the water used at the resort is recycled,” the Kuala Lumpur native said.

He is especially proud of his Zero Waste Eco Farm where ducks and chickens roam and organic vegetables grow.

“Those interested in learning more about how we do things here are welcome,” he said.

Other eco-friendly practices at the resort are worm composting, waste separation, solar heating and using natural sunlight and ventilation for the buildings.

Wong stresses the importance of grease traps.

“We re-use the cooking oil to make soaps and bio-diesel.

“There are old bathtubs everywhere and these are planted with organically grown vegetables and ulam,” he said.

“The frangipani flowers from our trees are dried and used to make tea and keropok (chips).”

Wong said future guests would be intrigued by a toilet made from used bottles next year.


Read more!

Malaysia: Shoppers to pay 20 sen for each plastic bag on Saturdays

The Star 2 Jan 11;

PETALING JAYA: Shoppers throughout the country will now have to pay 20 sen for each plastic bag when they shop at hypermarkets, supermarkets and Petronas service stations on Saturdays.

The move, which is already in force in Selangor and introduced to reduce the eight billion plastic bags used each year in Malaysia, caught many shoppers by surprise.

Other developments:

> The sum charged will go to a special fund which will benefit the environment and community;

> Shoppers in Penang will have to pay for their bags in these outlets every day; and

> Plastic industry players in Penang have expressed unhappiness, vowing to distribute 30,000 free bags in defiance of the move.

Nationwide green campaign begins at various outlets
Reports by DHARMENDER SINGH, DERRICK VINESH, MANJIT KAUR, MARTIN CARVALHO, SYLVIA LOOI, SHAUN HO, ZALINAH NOORDIN, K. ASHRAF KAMMED and SHARIN SHAIK
The Star 2 Jan 11;

PUTRAJAYA: Starting immediately, all hypermarkets, supermarkets and Petronas stations nationwide will no longer give out free plastic bags on Saturday.

Shoppers who do not bring their own plastic bags or “green bags” will be charged 20 sen for each bag they need from these outlets.

The Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Ministry launched yesterday a simultaneous nationwide campaign to encourage more outlets to take part in the effort to reduce the usage of plastic bags.

In a statement, the ministry said it had met with retailers to discuss the effort to minimise the use of plastic bags and more of them were expected to take part in the campaign.

It said money collected from the “sale” of plastic bags would be channelled into a special fund for environment preservation and protection programmes as well as to finance activities for consumers and the community.

Shoppers in Penang, however, will have to pay 20 sen per plastic bag every time they request for it from hypermarkets, chain stores and supermarkets.

Proceeds from the plastic bag sale in Penang would be channelled to the state’s Partners Against Poverty scheme to wipe out hardcore poverty.

The ministry said the campaign was launched as its projection showed that Malaysians would create 30,000 tonnes of solid waste daily by the year 2020.

Deputy Minister Datuk Tan Lian Hoe said hypermarkets nationwide distributed about 90 to 100 million plastic bags a year and about 20 million litres of petroleum was used to produce them.

“Imagine how much we can save from reducing the usage of plastic bags,” she added.

Launching the state-level campaign in Butterworth, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the ruling on free plastic bags would take effect from yesterday.

“We understand that the campaign may cause some inconvenience to the people, but the state government is willing to lose its popularity to protect the environment for our future generations,” he said.

He reminded operators of mini markets and shops to observe the “no free plastic bag day” on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays or risk losing their business licence.

Plastic bag makers unhappy over ban implementation
The Star 2 Jan 11;

PETALING JAYA: The no free plastic bag ruling — only on Saturday nationwide and every day in Penang — has drawn mixed reactions from interested parties.

While the Federation of Malaysian Consumers Association (Fomca) supports the ruling, the Malaysian Plastics Forum (MPF) and the Malaysian Plastics Manufacturers Association (MPMA) are unhappy with the decision taken by the federal and the Penang state governments.

“Plastic does not pollute the environment. It is the person that uses is who pollutes. I think there is plenty of misconceptions floating around about plastic bags,” said MPF chairman Lim Kok Boon.

He said the authorities should focus more on creating awareness of the 3Rs (reduce, reuse and recycle), rather than banning the use of plastic bags.

MPMA northern branch chairman Willy Tan said the association would distribute 30,000 free plastic bags with an explanation on the myths surrounding plastic bags printed on them from today through newspaper vendors.

Fomca executive officer Datuk Paul Selvaraj lauded the no free plastic bag ruling and said it was the first step towards encouraging people to recycle and reuse.

Penang Gerakan environmental bureau head Tan Chai Liang said the state government should consult the plastic industry to work out a better plan before implementing a total ban on free plastic bags in the state.

He said any change in business plans should be implemented gradually and noted that plastic manufacturers and the industry have been part of the state’s economy.

Penang shoppers laud move to save the environment
The Star 2 Jan 11;

GEORGE TOWN: Many shoppers in Penang have given the thumbs-up for the “no free plastic bags” ruling in the state.

An expatriate from Germany, Husne Kaya, 40, said she was shocked to see the way Malaysians used plastic bags.

Kaya who was shopping at Sam Batik House on Penang Road said back in her home country, people would bring their own reusable bags or pay if they wanted plastic bags.

“I’m happy with the programme implemented here,” she said.

Tourist R. Kamachi, 30, from Singapore also lauded the move.

“We need to save the environment and this is a good start. In Singapore, we do have a similar ruling as well,” she said.

Damithah Fisson, 26, from Alor Setar said other states should follow the example set by Penang to save our planet.

A check at several stores and supermarkets showed that most were adhering to the ruling.

However, checks at several outlets in Batu Feringghi showed that plastic bags were still being given for free at mini markets, tailor shops and souvenir shops.

Sunshine Wholesale Mart general manager Yee Kam Ming said being the first day, many shoppers forgot to bring their own bags.

He said only 20% of the shoppers had brought their own bags, while the rest had to be provided with paper boxes and brown recycled bags.

“I hope the public will start preparing themselves by bringing their own bags.

“But there is a need for more publicity so that the message reaches everyone. Then, we don’t need to remind our customers repeatedly about the new ruling,” he added.

Supermarkets and petrol stations give full support to new ruling
The Star 2 Jan 11;

PETALING JAYA: The “no free plastic bag day” ruling on Saturday at hypermarkets, supermarkets and Petronas stations nationwide was launched simultaneously in all states yesterday.

Perak Domestic Trade, Coopera­tives and Consume­rism Depart­ment assistant director Amer Mansor said the ruling received full support from hypermarkets, supermarkets and all Petronas stations.

Launching the state-level campaign in Ipoh, Amer advised shoppers to bring their own bags if they needed to shop on that day or pay 20 sen for each plastic bag.

However, many shoppers were caught unawares and had come without their own bags.

A shopper who declined to be named said she was not aware of the campaign. She ended up loading all her groceries into a trolley to take them to her car.

In Malacca, Transport and Consumerism Committee chairman Datuk R. Perumah said it was the start of the state’s green campaign.

“Hypermarkets, supermarkets and other outlets are free to extend the ruling beyond Saturdays if they wish,” he said.

He also added that shoppers could buy reusable grocery bags sold at hypermarkets and supermarkets for between RM1 and RM5 depending on size and design as a long-term alternative to plastic bags.

In Putrajaya, officials from the Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Ministry distributed pamphlets on the campaign and free reusable cloth bags to shoppers.

In Klang, ministry deputy secretary-general Mahani Tan Abdullah urged traders and consumers to work together to reduce the use of plastic bags.

“This is in line with the efforts to ensure a healthier and safer environment for the people,” said Mahani when launching the Selangor level campaign at AEON Bukit Tinggi yesterday.

AEON corporate social responsibility and corporate branding general manager Noryahwati Mohd Noh said the company had saved 10 million plastic bags since the Selangor government implemented the “no free plastic bag” ruling two years ago.


Read more!

India's hidden climate change catastrophe

Over the past decade, as crops have failed year after year, 200,000 farmers have killed themselves
Alex Renton The Independent 2 Jan 11;

Naryamaswamy Naik went to the cupboard and took out a tin of pesticide. Then he stood before his wife and children and drank it. "I don't know how much he had borrowed. I asked him, but he wouldn't say," Sugali Nagamma said, her tiny grandson playing at her feet. "I'd tell him: don't worry, we can sell the salt from our table."

Ms Nagamma, 41, showed us a picture of her husband – good-looking with an Elvis-style hairdo – on the day they married a quarter of a century ago. "He'd been unhappy for a month, but that day he was in a heavy depression. I tried to take the tin away from him but I couldn't. He died in front of us. The head of the family died in front of his wife and children – can you imagine?"

The death of Mr Naik, a smallholder in the central Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, in July 2009, is just another mark on an astonishingly long roll. Nearly 200,000 Indian farmers have killed themselves in the past decade. Like Mr Naik, a third of them choose pesticide to do it: an agonising, drawn-out death with vomiting and convulsions.

The death toll is extrapolated from the Indian authorities' figures. But the journalist Palagummi Sainath is certain the scale of the epidemic of rural suicides is underestimated and that it is getting worse. "Wave upon wave," he says, from his investigative trips in the states of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. "One farmer every 30 minutes in India now, and sometimes three in one family." Because standards of record-keeping vary across the nation, many suicides go unnoticed. In some Indian states, the significant numbers of women who kill themselves are not listed as "farmers", even if that is how they make their living.

Mr Sainath is an award-winning expert on rural poverty in India, a famous figure across India through his writing for The Hindu newspaper. I spoke to him at a screening of Nero's Guests, a documentary film about the suicide epidemic and some of the more eye-popping inequalities of modern India.

"Poverty has assaulted rural India," he said. "Farmers who used to be able to send their children to college now can't send them to school. For all that India has more dollar billionaires than the UK, we have 600 million poor. The wealth has not trickled down." Almost all the bereaved families report that debts and land loss because of unsuccessful crops were among their biggest problems.

The causes of that poverty are complex. Mr Sainath points to the long-term collapse of markets for farmers' produce. About half of all the suicides occur in the four states of India's cotton belt; the price of cotton in real terms, he says, is a twelfth of what it was 30 years ago. Vandana Shiva, a scientist-turned-campaigner, also links failures of cotton farming with the farmer suicides: she says the phenomenon was born in 1997 when the Indian government removed subsidies from cotton farming. This was also when genetically modified seed was widely introduced.

"Every suicide can be linked to Monsanto," says Ms Shiva, claiming that the biotech firm's modified Bt Cotton caused crop failure and poverty because it needed to be used with pesticide and fertilisers. The Prince of Wales has made the same accusation. Monsanto denies that its activities are to blame, saying that Indian rural poverty has many causes.

Beyond any argument – though no less politically charged – is the role of the weather in this story. India's climate, always complicated by the Himalayas on one side and turbulent oceans on the two others, has been particularly unreliable in recent years. In Rajasthan, in the north-west, a 10-year drought ended only this summer, while across much of India the annual monsoons have failed three times in the past decade.

India's 600 million farmers and the nation's poor are often the same people: a single failed crop tends to wipe out their savings and may lead to them losing their land. After that, there are few ways back. The drought, following a failed monsoon, that I saw in Andhra Pradesh in 2009 was the tipping point that drove Mr Naik to suicide.

Such tragedies and even the selling of children for marriage or as bonded labour – a common shock-horror news story in India – are the most dramatic results. But far more common is the story of rural families migrating, in tens of millions, to India's cities, swelling the ranks of the urban poor and leaving holes in the farming infrastructure that keeps India fed.

I visited an idyllic village, Surah na Kheda, last month in the limerick-worthy district of Tonk, Rajasthan. We arrived to find the rows of whitewashed mud-walled houses gleaming in the rising sun, while inside the courtyards women in bright saris were stirring milk to make yogurt and butter for the day's meals. Their daughters kneaded dough for the breakfast chapattis.

But there was an odd thing: a distinct lack of people. There were the old and the very young – but virtually no one of working age. Half the village, some 60 adults and many children, had gone to Jaipur, the state capital, to look for work. Even though the Diwali holiday fell the following week, no one expected their neighbours and relatives back. Times were too hard.

Prabhati Devi, 50, said four of her seven children had joined the exodus. "They had to go," she said. "Twenty years ago, we could grow all we needed, and sell things too. Now we can't grow wheat, we can't grow pulses, we can't even grow carrots, because there is not enough rain. So we go to the cities, looking for money."

She looked bereaved as she talked of the damage the 10-year drought had done. "It crushes people," she said. "Before, we were able to deal with drought. It would come every four years, and you could prepare. We would store grain and people could share it. In the past, when your buffalo wasn't giving milk, neighbours would share theirs. But now kindness is no longer possible."

I found the other end of Surah na Kheda's story under a flyover in Jaipur. Here, in the early morning, hundreds of men and boys, farmers from all over northern India, gather looking for work as labourers on the city's building sites. Many of them sleep under the flyover, and their clothes were stiff with dirt. The air was tense, and smelled of drugs and cheap alcohol.

Shankar Lal, one of the Surah na Kheda émigrés, was sipping tea at a stall under the flyover with half a dozen other young men from the village, waiting for a contractor to give them a lift. "If the rains came back we would be farmers again. But will they?" He did not think so: "In 10 years' time, there will be no village. Everyone will be here in the city. Or they will be dead."

The men were working for 150 rupees (£2.15) a day, decorating a house in one of Jaipur's posh suburbs. This is relatively good work, and they had all found a floor to sleep on. In another building site, we found a seven-strong rural family who slept in the cement store. The mother and grandmother were working for less than £1 a day, carrying cement and bricks on their heads up precarious bamboo scaffolding. In one half-built block of flats a baby slept in the dust next to the cement mixer. None of these people were happy to be in the city. "If we could survive at home we would go straight back," I was told.

Many of the labourers on the sites were children, some as young as 12: an interrupted education is another part of the social fallout of rural collapse. In Rajasthan, most older people in the villages told me they had not gone to school, but they were proud that their children had. However, the new poverty brought about by the "chaos in the weather" was keeping their grandchildren out of school.

According to the World Food Programme, 20 million more people joined the ranks of India's hungry in the past decade, and half of all the country's children are underweight. Some analyses say that fast-developing India is performing worse than some of the poorest countries, such as Liberia and Haiti, in addressing the basic issue of hunger. With so many farmers giving up, the question is how India will feed the entire country, not just its poor.

It is widely agreed that there have been radical shifts in the weather patterns in India in the past two decades; what is less certain are the causes. Is the change in the weather "climate change"? For many development workers, the question needs answering, because the collapse of India's rural economy – if it continues – will bring about a catastrophe that will affect people far beyond India's borders: even rumours of a poor monsoon or bad harvest in India tends to send food prices on the world commodity markets soaring, as they did again this spring.

Alka Awasthi, of Cecoedecon, a Rajasthani rural poverty organisation part-funded by Oxfam, asks: "When is the data going to catch up with the stories? Why don't the scientists come and listen to people who actually work with the rain? They don't know what a woman like Prabhati Devi is dealing with."

But at Rajasthan's Institute of Development Studies, Surjit Singh believes the calamitous weather shifts are as much to do with changing patterns of farming, growing population and failed government policies as any greater human-induced change to the climate. "The state has failed the rural poor, and so has the private sector. Economic liberalisation has clearly failed. How long can the boom go on? The economy may be growing at 9 per cent but food-price inflation is running at 16 to 18 per cent."

Dr Singh is in no doubt, though, that the changes in weather have increased poverty in rural India – and that there lies a huge injustice. "Climate change puts the onus on the poor to adapt – but that's wrong. Who is using the planes, the cars and the plastic bottles? Not the poor man with no drinking water."

For Mrs Devi and Sugali Nagamma, though, such debates are meaningless. I asked Mrs Devi if she had a question to ask me. "If these industries and factories stop burning petrol and sending poison into the atmosphere will it bring our rains back?" I had to tell her I did not know.

For more on Oxfam's work in India visit: www.oxfam.org.uk/climate


Read more!