Level of shark trade not sustainable

Straits Times 26 Feb 12;

The article, 'No sense in shark's fin ban: Experts' (Feb 17), interpreted statements by Professor Steve Oakley of Shark Savers Malaysia as agreeing with Dr Giam Choo Hoo and Mr Hank Jenkins' opposition to a shark's fin ban.

That interpretation misses the sentiment of the broader discussion, in which Prof Oakley argued in favour of sustainability and for rejecting the consumption of sharks.

Shark populations worldwide are in decline because of unsustainable overfishing, largely driven by the demand for shark's fin.

The result, in many cases, has been severe population depletion or collapse. Regional losses of highly targeted species are as high as 99per cent in some cases.

Most sharks are not caught by poor fishermen but by pelagic, commercial fishing boats. The shark's fin trade has turned previously artisanal fishermen, who rarely targeted sharks and had a negligible impact on local shark populations, into more aggressive fishermen specifically targeting sharks to supply the international fin trade.

Alternatively, sustainable fishing, of non-shark species, helps poor fishermen by ensuring fish for the future. The greatest success in helping poor fishing communities has been where shark eco-tourism replaces shark killing, providing a long-term, sustainable source of income.

Sharks are critically important to healthy oceans and we must improve the viability of sharks for the future. Current levels of consumption and trade are not sustainable.

The Animal Concerns Research and Education Society (Acres) has recommended a ban on shark products in Singapore until vulnerable shark populations have recovered and trade can be scientifically proven to be sustainable. Shark Savers supports Acres' recommendation.

Let's all do our part now by not eating shark's fin or meat.

Jonn Benedict Lu

Regional Director

Shark Savers


Read more!

Mixing nature with business

The life detour that Heinrich Jessen took - into a rainforest wilderness - led him back to the family business where, as chairman, he is ensuring Jebsen & Jessen (South-east Asia) minimises its footprint on the earth. Neo Chai Chin reports
by Neo Chai Chin Today Online 26 Feb 12;

He resisted going into the family business as a young man, preferring instead to pursue his passion for biology and the environment.

But it was during a stint as a field assistant in the pristine rainforests of Papua New Guinea that Mr Heinrich Jessen saw a way for business and nature to come together.

He eventually entered the family business spearheading environment, health and safety initiatives, and is today chairman of Jebsen & Jessen (South-east Asia), a S$1billion-turnover engineering, manufacturing and distribution company headquartered in Singapore with an uncompromisingly eco-conscious core.

It's not always the most profitable path to take, admits Mr Jessen, 44, a Danish Singapore permanent resident who has lived here for the last 17 years. But he wouldn't have it any other way.

Jebsen & Jessen (SEA) is one of three companies belonging to a family enterprise that began in 1895 as a shipping agency facilitating trade along China's coast. Mr Jessen's father established Jebsen & Jessen (SEA) in Singapore and Malaysia in 1963, and Jessen junior lived in Singapore between the ages of 10 and 15.

He has always enjoyed greenery and hiking, but the green trigger occurred at the age of 20 when, after a year in business school, he went to work for the World Wildlife Fund in Italy. "I had a very lowly job there, mainly translating documents, but it exposed me to the issues and we did lots of nature conservation programmes. That's when I decided to study it," he says.

His decision to pursue environmental studies went against the expectation that he would enter the family business. His father was "very disappointed when I took that decision because I had no intention of going into the business and, at that time, I think neither he nor I saw that these two things could be brought together - I wanted to be in nature and he wanted to run a successful business."

INTO THE WILD

After graduating from George Washington University in the United States, Mr Jessen applied for a number of field assistant positions, and picked one in the "most ulu (far flung)" location "furthest from any point of civilisation": A project run on behalf of Conservation International in the middle of Papua New Guinea.

The four-year project took place in the Crater Mountain region of Papua New Guinea, and Mr Jessen signed on for two three-month rotations as a field assistant to an ornithologist and plant ecologist. He researched on the fruit dispersal system of a particular tree species, and did behavioural experiments on a flightless bird called a dwarf cassowary (no cruelty involved, he assures).

The researchers lived largely on tinned food in a tin-roofed wood house lit by kerosene lamps and with limited electricity generated by solar panels. They received mail delivered by porters fortnightly, and tuned in to the Christian Science Monitor's radio station to stay in touch with the outside world - the team once wrote the folks at the radio station a letter, and got a tremendous high hearing it read over the airwaves a few months later.

Mr Jessen speaks fondly of his time there: "Would I do it again? Yes! Would I recommend it to anybody else? Yes. It's like National Service, something you'll never forget."

ONE OF THE FIRST, IN THE 1990S

It was also amidst the stunning scenery and crystal-clear waters that Mr Jessen read a book on his family's history, and realised a possible way to combine his interest in nature and what his family wanted of him.

He went for his Master's in tropical ecology but eventually opted for industrial environmental management, and joined the company thereafter.

At the time, Jebsen & Jessen (SEA) was engaged in several activities with environment, health and safety risks that "we probably weren't very aware of", he says. "We were compliant with the law where we needed to be, but weren't going the extra step to be proactive."

Mr Jessen got the company ISO-certified in the areas of environment and health and safety, becoming one of the first in the region to do so in the late 1990s.

With the new direction forged, the firm pulled the plug on several of its businesses that were "not in line anymore with our environmental ethic". For instance, it used to export Indonesian wood furniture mainly to Europe, but got out of the business in 1996 when its supplier declined to seek Forest Stewardship Council certification.

It also exited the marine paint business in the late 1990s because of the harm to the marine organisms that an ingredient called tributyltin oxide caused.

PATH TO CARBON NEUTRALITY

Over the past 15 years, the company has chosen to remain largely in businesses in which it is among the top three in the market - it is No 1 or 2 in the overhead travelling cranes business in most of ASEAN, for instance. Jebsen & Jessen (SEA) is also actively looking at suitable acquisition targets, and to grow in markets like Cambodia and Myanmar.

In Singapore, its presence has contributed to some key landmarks - its various business units provided the irrigation and window-cleaning systems of the Gardens by the Bay, and produced and supplied strong, lightweight polystyrene blocks to raise some areas of the park. The same polystyrene blocks, called Jeofoam, were used to fill part of the world's longest public cantilever atop the Marina Bay Sands.

These days, Jebsen & Jessen (SEA) are on the path towards carbon neutrality - not the easiest goal for an entity engaged in diverse activities ranging from the distribution, manufacturing and servicing of cranes, to the supply of turf and irrigation equipment and moulded packaging.

It is installing solar panels at its crane factory in Tuas - which will supply 149,380 KWh of electricity annually, or one-fifth of energy consumption - and looking at projects to offset its carbon emissions.

A way to create a "level playing field" for companies to reduce their carbon footprint is for a carbon tax imposed in all countries, says Mr Jessen. "Nobody wants to be the only one taking the big step. Very few governments want to impose a carbon tax if nobody else is doing it. No company wants to self-impose a carbon tax if no one else is doing it.

"I think carbon tax doesn't have to come on top of income tax. It can be, instead, a portion of your income tax, so I don't think it has to mean you're paying more taxes."

RESISTANCE AND THE BOTTOMLINE

Asked if his green initiatives caused resistance from his colleagues, Mr Jessen says: "Absolutely. We have very flat decision-making, so if you're a manager and incentivised on your profits and you're managing your own business and accustomed to making your own decisions, and someone from the head office comes and he's also son of the chairman and owner, it can become quite irritating."

Some initiatives have been good for the bottomline - insurance premiums went down significantly after environment, health and safety systems were in place, for instance.

But others cost money, and that's when Mr Jessen tries to get his colleagues to think longer-term. "Carbon neutrality is one of them. And there, quite frankly, my case is quite simple," he says. "I have two kids (aged 7 and 4) and they are still too young to know much about global climate change. But … I can see there will come a day when they will ask, 'Global climate change is having some disastrous consequences. So, Dad, what did you do about it? You knew this was coming, you have some influence as a whole company.'

"So I'd like to be able to look them in the eye and say, 'Well, at least I got us to carbon neutrality'."


Read more!

Malaysia: Wildlife protection groups upset over Anson decision

The Star 25 Feb 12;

PETALING JAYA: Wildlife protection groups are upset with the court decision to allow the appeal of convicted wildlife trader Anson Wong, who has since been released from jail.

WWF-Malaysia likened the decision as “flying in the face of efforts by various stakeholders to curb the rising threat of illegal wildlife trade”.

Wong, who walked free on Wednesday after the Court of Appeal reduced his jail sentence from five years to 17 months and 15 days, was described by WWF-Malaysia as an “internationally known notorious wildlife trafficker”.

The movement hoped the Court of Appeal would hand down a written judgement so the public could better understand the decision.

It also called on Malaysia to urgently establish a specialised Environmental Court to preside over wildlife cases.

Wong, who was convicted on Sept 6, last year of illegally exporting boa constrictors by the Sepang Sessions Court, was initially sentenced to six months' jail and fined RM190,000.

The High Court increased his jail term to five years upon appeal.

Wildlife trade monitoring network Traffic said Wong, 54, was not a first-time offender as he was previously sentenced to 71 months' jail and fined US$60,000 (RM180,629) for money laundering linked to wildlife trade in the United States.

Its South-East Asia regional director Dr William Schaedla also urged the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry to ensure Wong's licences remain revoked.

This would render Wong unable to trade in any wildlife. He warned that the case would have a long-term impact on the fight against wildlife crime.

“Traffickers will simply work small fines and short jail stays into their calculations as business costs,” he said.

Anson Wong Goes Free
David Braun National Geographic 28 Feb 12;

Last week, Anson Wong, the world’s most notorious international wildlife dealer, walked out of a Malaysian prison a free man after a Malaysian Appeals Court reduced his sentence for trafficking wildlife from five years to time served—17 months. Wong, who featured prominently in the National Geographic story “The Kingpin” (January 2010), was also the target of a major U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service investigation in the 1990s. He has made a career of offering for sale many of the world’s most iconic and endangered species and their parts—snow leopards, pandas, rhinoceroses, tigers, rare birds, and endangered reptiles.

But the mistake that got him arrested by Malaysian authorities in 2010 was relatively minor: He was passing through Kuala Lumpur International Airport on his way to Jakarta, Indonesia, when a lock on his suitcase broke, revealing 95 boa constrictors, a couple of African vipers, and a South American turtle.

Wong’s 2010 arrest came on the heels of an amazing list of reforms undertaken in Malaysia. After publication of “The Kingpin,” the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE) announced a restructuring of Malaysia’s wildlife department, Perhilitan. It declared that “special permits” to possess endangered species would likewise be better scrutinized. Malaysia’s parliament passed the Wildlife Conservation Act of 2010, a major reform. A few weeks later, Wong was caught by airline personnel with his illicit suitcase. MNRE announced it was taking away his business licenses and seizing his animals. Wong was sentenced to five years.

Now, he is out.

Steve Galster, director of FREELAND Foundation and a primary architect of the ASEAN region’s wildlife enforcement network, ASEAN-WEN, said this about Wong’s release: “Asia’s illegal wildlife trade is run by wealthy people with powerful connections. Anson Wong’s conviction and imprisonment gave us hope that the winds were changing. Last week’s very early release of this notorious crook reminds us that the traffickers still run the show in Asia.”

Dr. William Schaedla, Regional Director, TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, believes a major opportunity was lost in not investigating Wong’s cell phones and laptop, which were seized upon his arrest. “At the very least these should have provided insight into his business dealings. Yet despite repeated assurances that further investigations were part of the prosecution’s strategy, nearly a year and a half passed with no new charges or evidence logged.” More use should have been made of INTERPOL, which has a dedicated Wildlife Crime Officer based in Bangkok, Schaedla says. “Mr. Wong and his ilk are not just trading common house pets or livestock. They are dealing largely in species at imminent risk of extinction.”

That global wildlife law enforcement could be better coordinated is underscored by the fact that Malaysia’s Court considered Wong a “first offender,” even though he had previously been imprisoned in both the U.S. and Mexico.

Efforts are currently underway in Malaysia to establish a “green court” dedicated to hearing environmental cases. In the U.S., the creation of the Environmental and Natural Resources Division at the Justice Department was one of the most significant advances in the evolution of environmental law enforcement.

February has been a rough month for law enforcement. Earlier this month, U.S. Senator Rand Paul introduced S.2062—Freedom from Over-Criminalization and Unjust Seizures Act of 2012, a bill that would gut the Lacey Act, arguably the most important wildlife law in the world. The Lacey Act is the law that put Anson Wong in jail the first time.

“I can get you anything here from anywhere,” Wong once told a U.S. undercover agent. “Nothing can be done to me. I could sell a panda—and, nothing. As long as I’m in Malaysia,” Wong said, “I’m safe.”

We will see if times have changed in Malaysia.


Read more!

Malaysia: Royal Belum rainforest still untouched

Edmund Ngo The Star 26 Feb 12;

IPOH: No illegal logging activities have been detected in the 130 million-year-old Royal Belum rainforest in Hulu Perak, said Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir.

He said based on aerial surveillance conducted by the state authorities recently, illegal logging was only detected in the Temenggor forest, which borders the Royal Belum rainforest area.

“Even so, we will not take things for granted and continue the surveillance to ensure that there is no intrusion, illegal logging or poaching in the rainforest,” he said yesterday.

Dr Zambry, however, added that the state would do its best to ensure that the precious green lung was preserved.

He clarified that some parts of the Temenggor forest had been allocated as logging areas.

“For these specific areas, logging is permitted with strict standards, such as the size of trees felled and proper reforestation programmes,” he added.


Read more!

Malaysia: Mangroves make wetland conservation important

Borneo Post 26 Feb 12;

KUCHING: The conservation of wetlands in the state will be a continuous effort as the state upped its ante on sustainable forest management, said Second Minister of Resource Planning and Environment Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hassan.

Awang Tengah who is also Minister of Public Utilities and Minister of Industrial Development said yesterday sustainable forest management of wetlands was important due to the presence of mangroves which help filter polluted air, prevent land erosion and become a defence against tsunamis.

“Therefore it’s important to preserve the over 6,000 hectares of wetlands here,” he told reporters when met after he officiated at the World’s Wetland Day 2012 state level celebration at Kuching Wetlands National Park (KWNP) in Sg Lemidin.

Also present were Assistant Environment Minister Datu Len Talif Salleh, Assistant Resource Planning Minister Datuk Mohd Naroden Majais and State Forest director Ali Yusop.

In his speech earlier, Awang Tengah highlighted plans to turn the wetland park into an ecotourism destination.

“The setback for now is lack of promotion. The wetland park has potential to become a sustainable tourism product.

“However, it is important to have an ecosystem management plan which is not only for preservation but benefit the local economy.

“Both the Forestry Department and the community are stakeholders who must preserve this area as a heritage for future generations,” Awang Tengah said on how to balance the management of the wetlands between conservation and ecotourism.

He revealed that in 2010, a total of 940 million people visited wetlands around the world.

The United Nation (UN) World Tourism Organisation predicted the figure would increase to 1.6 billion by year 2020,

Awang Tengah said numerous animal species like the proboscis monkeys, dolphins, fireflies and mangrove trees were the main attraction. He suggested visitors explore the park by boat.

Meanwhile Ali, in his speech, said KWNP was dominated by mangrove species: Avecennia, Rhizophora, Sonneratia and Bruguiera.

The wetland national park was gazetted the first Ramsar site in the state on Nov 8, 2005.

In August 2008, the state government commissioned Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Unimas) to conduct a multi-disciplinary assessment of KWNP for a description of the physical, biological and human environment of the area.

Following the study, a book on ‘Managent Planning of the KWNP — Ramsar Site’ was launched yesterday.


Read more!

Malaysia: Area near Sibu Laut new Ramsar site?

Borneo Post 26 Feb 12;

KUCHING: An area at Sibu Laut near here will be gazetted as the new Ramsar site replacing the 3,000 acres of mangrove wetland at Sungai Lemidin, which has been cleared as a soil dumping site for the flood mitigation project.

Assistant Environment Minister Datu Len Talif Salleh told reporters yesterday that the new area was deemed most suitable due to its natural state.

Even though the new area at Sibu Laut will be turned into a national park, Len who is also Assistant Minister in the Chief Minister’s Office assured that the local community would not be deprived of its natural resources.

“The most important factor is that we must continue to preserve this natural heritage to prevent natural disaster from happening. In the meantime, we must be sensitive to the needs of the people in this area.

“Being the stakeholder, the life of local communities in this national park should continue as usual in benefiting from the natural resources.

“As long as everybody plays their role in our sustainable forest management policy,” he continued after the launching of the World’s Wetland Day 2012 state level celebration held at Kuching Wetlands National Park at Sg Lemidin here.

Second Minister of Resource Planning and Environment Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hassan officiated at the event.

Meanwhile, state forest director Ali Yusop when met earlier, clarified that the 3,000 acres clearing of mangrove wetlands at an area at Sg Lemidin used as a soil dumping site will be rehabilitated once the Kuching flood mitigation project is completed.

“This area was cleared for soil dumping considering that it is situated near a two-kilometre canal and eventually become part of the eight km flood mitigation diversion channel,” he stated.

When asked whether the state would lose its Ramsar status due to the mangrove clearance, Ali said that it will not be the case because Ramsar was not purely conservation but also about sustainable development.

It can be turned into an eco-tourism area and continue to provide natural resources to the local community.

In addition, he explained that the state will carry out re-planting of mangrove trees along the coastal areas throughout the state covering 300 hectares.

Under the Ninth Malaysia Plan, the state has been allocated some RM4.5 million for the purpose, he continued.

“We will not only focus on mangrove but other suitable trees such as main species of Avecennia, Rhizophora, Sonneratia and Bruguiera.

“Site matching is very important,” Ali said.

The wetland area of Sg Lemidin was part of the Kuching Wetland National Park, the first Ramsar site in the state.

The country has five other Ramsar sites – lake Bera in Pahang, Piai peninsular, Kukup island and Kulai river in Johor and the Lower Kinabatangan-Segama Wetland in Sabah.

Ramsar is a town in Iran where the first wetland convention took place on Feb 2, 1971.


Read more!

Thailand: Are zoos cashing in on tiger trade?

Privately owned wildlife parks have long been implicated in the illegal sale of endangered animals and animal parts, but the lack of a DNA database and difficulty in collecting information means there is little clear evidence to confirm the suspicions
Bangkok Post 26 Feb 12;

Trade and trafficking in tigers and tiger parts in Thailand drew international attention following the seizure of 400kg of tiger meat and carcasses in Bangkok's Khlong Sam Wa district earlier this month. It's remained a thorny issue in Thailand despite global efforts to save the animals from extinction.

All five remaining tiger subspecies are considered seriously endangered and three subspecies have vanished in the last 60 years. In addition to human encroachment into their habitats, this is also driven by a demand for tiger parts which are believed by some to bring health and vitality.

In Thailand, despite protective measures the poaching of wild tigers in national parks and wildlife sanctuaries continues, and more seizures of tigers and tiger parts _ believed to be mostly from tigers bred in captivity _ indicate that consumer demand is growing.

There has been no substantial evidence proving the involvement of private zoos and wildlife parks in Thailand in supplying tigers and tiger parts to the black market, but suspicions remain because of the large sums of money to be made in the trade and the high costs of running these operations. Private zoos are legal in Thailand under the 1992 Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act and are allowed to possess wildlife species listed as preserved and protected under the act. There are currently 15 preserved species and 1,302 protected species recognised under Thai law.

Operators of private zoos must first obtain a zoo licence (Sor Por 21) and also a temporary permit to possess wildlife species (Sor Por 2) from the National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department. Of the 40 licensed private zoos in the country, 21 raise and breed tigers.

The 1992 act strictly outlaws trade in tigers or tiger parts, and moreover, tigers are protected by the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), which prohibits international trade in protected animals, animal parts and derivatives for commercial purposes.

This means that the private zoos cannot buy or sell tigers or other restricted animals to each other or to anyone else. Private zoo owners usually say their animals were in their possession before the restrictions were in place or are the offspring of such animals. Transfers of animals between licensed private zoos are also allowed with approval from the National Parks Department, but this is a complicated process.

As the number of private zoos has grown, the National Parks Department has tightened the regulations for issuing new licences for the zoos, and concerned government agencies have also stepped up suppression efforts against smugglers.

Last year, government officials rescued two leopard cubs (which are also protected) at a place that had been designated for a new private zoo in Chaiyaphum province. The owner had not yet obtained a licence from the National Parks Department. Earlier, two adult leopards were seized at the same location. The owner could not provide any documents to show where he obtained the animals. According to a National Parks Department official, the leopards were taken from the Huay Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary in Uthai Thani province. The department withdrew the owner's application for a licence to set up a zoo.

National Parks Department deputy director-general Theerapat Prayoonsit said that his department cannot prohibit anyone from applying for a licence to set up a private zoo. However, he added, the department closely monitors the population of tigers in each zoo to ensure that they are not sold to traders.

At present, 888 tigers from 21 private zoos are registered with the department, which is also responsible for recording the identity of each tiger. Si Racha Tiger Zoo in Chon Buri is the largest operation of this type in the country, holding about 400 tigers.

Noting that the law does not limit the number of animals a zoo may keep, Mr Theerapat said, ''What we can do is ask for cooperation from the zoos to limit their tiger populations and give them good care.''

However, he added, the zoo owners may ''fiddle with'' the number of tigers. ''For example, if four cubs are born, they report only two. So they can sell the other two cubs or raise them in another place,'' he said. ''If anything happens to these tigers we cannot trace them back to the zoo.''

Pol Col Kiatipong Khaosam-ang, deputy commander the Natural Resources and Environmental Crime Suppression Division (NED), agreed that this is a big problem. ''This is the easiest method used in promoting the illegal tiger trade,'' he said.

''When a tiger dies, the [private] zoo will not report to the authorities as required. It is sold in the black market, and a new tiger is brought to the zoo.''

DNA DATABASE NEEDED

Following the large seizure of tiger meat and carcasses in early February, National Parks Department officials and police inspected private zoos in Chon Buri, including the Million Years Stone Park, Pattaya Crocodile Farm and Si Racha Tiger Zoo. The latter had been accused before of involvement in the illegal trade in tigers and tiger parts. However, said Mr Theerapat, his department was able to account for all tigers there.

Chuwit Pitakpornpallop, owner of the Trakarn Tiger Zoo in Ubon Ratchathani province, said that domestic licensed and regulated tiger zoos are always the first place authorities look to make arrests or seize live tigers whenever this type of case surfaces. But he said that licensed private zoos are always open for inspection from authorities, and added that National Parks Department regional officials regularly inspect his zoo every two or three months, along with police from the NED.

The inspection covers all kinds of preserved and protected wild animals in the zoo, he said. ''They will check the animals' microchips, take photos of each animal and check its documents, and look at records of births and deaths. They also take DNA samples,'' said Mr Chuwit.

However Kanita Ouitavon, a senior scientist at the department's Wildlife Forensic Science Unit, said the National Parks Department does not have DNA samples from private zoos.

There is a plan to start a DNA database in the near future, an initiative Ms Kanita fully supports. Such a database would make it much easier for the department to fulfil its mandate to keep track of all protected animals in the possession of private zoos. This issue was at the forefront of Interpol's ''Third Meeting of the Wildlife Crime Working Group'' in Bangkok from Feb 13-17. The group endorsed DNA testing as a way to stamp out trade in wild meat by tracing the origins of seized meat. At the meeting, assistant national police chief Chalermkiat Sirworakan said, ''We need the help of forensic medicine in the suppression of wildlife crimes,'' and added that DNA testing and establishing a relevant database was not a complicated procedure. He suggested that the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry fund the programme.

Meanwhile, Mr Chuwit said authorities should be looking elsewhere than at private zoos, and challenged them to inspect big livestock farms, especially those along the borders, where he says tigers are illegally bred and traded in the black market.

''For instance, a big cattle farm in Kanchanaburi province and an unlicensed tiger farm in Saraburi province breed and slaughter tigers for sale,'' he said.

Another significant source of trafficked tigers is farms in neighbouring countries such as Malaysia and Myanmar, said Mr Chuwit.

''Tigers are transported through Thailand, Laos and Vietnam to China. The tigers and tiger parts which are often seized in Phetchaburi and Prachuap Khiri Khan provinces are from farms along the borders inside neighbouring countries,'' he said.

Mr Theerapat agreed that many tigers seized in recent years have been smuggled from neighbouring countries.

During the past few years smuggled tigers and other wildlife have been found in trucks carrying fruits and other goods from the South. The drivers have told authorities that they were to deliver them at Talad Thai market in Rangsit, on the outskirts of Bangkok. Mr Theerapat said the market has huge cold storage warehouses.

Pol Colonel Kiatipong Khaosam-ang, NED deputy commander, said Thai authorities can and do seek cooperation from government agencies in neighbouring countries, but added that it is also necessary to strictly control the domestic facilities because some of them supply tigers for illegal breeding and slaughter.

Mr Chuwit admitted that in spite of regulations requiring private zoo operators to inform authorities of births and deaths, some domestic tiger zoos do not report the actual figures. He blamed it on the ''time-consuming process'' of obtaining legal transfer permits which allow private zoos to exchange animals. These are granted only in rare cases.

''In some cases, a private zoo urgently wants tiger cubs for show to attract customers. Under such circumstances, unregistered tiger cubs can be easily transferred to licensed zoos,'' he said. However, this doesn't happen very often because most zoos can easily breed their own cubs.

Mr Chuwit said that another situation that encourages illegal trading among private zoos is the exchange of adult tigers to avoid problems from captive inbreeding and keep the animals genetically healthy. Tigers grow very fast and can mate when they reach three years old, he said, and because getting legal approval is usually a long process, some zoo owners buy unregistered cubs and register them as newborns at their zoos.

But he said that selling or trading unregistered cubs is ''not worth the risk''. If caught, the zoo must pay a heavy fine and may be closed down.

''And forget about an exchange of tigers with zoos in foreign countries. After problems occurred in the transfer of 100 tigers from Si Racha Tiger Zoo to China many years ago, the National Parks Department won't allow any private zoos to import or export tigers,'' said Mr Chuwit.

At present his operation has possession of 48 tigers at Trakarn Tiger Zoo and 54 at Tiger Kingdom, an offshoot zoo in Chiang Mai's Mae Rim district. Each year an average of 10-15 tiger cubs are born in captivity at the two zoos. With the increasing number of tigers he plans to supply two more private zoos in the near future, one in Phuket and one near Suvarnabhumi airport on Bang Na-Trat Road. He looks on this as a good business move that also solves the expensive problem of caring for too many tigers. Mr Chuwit said that private zoos facing financial problems often separate males and females, but each has its own way of dealing with the matter.


Read more!

The 2011 Philippine Biodiversity Expedition: Unraveling the Philippines’s natural wonders

Pamela Reblora Business Mirror 25 Feb 12;

THOUGH a lot of species have already been discovered through scientific explorations and studies, it is believed that 90 percent of life on the planet is yet to be known.

Though the Earth is just a pinprick of a planet in the universe, it is the only known planet that supports life. Humans, the most intelligent form of life, have been struggling to identify other life forms through scientific explorations. And the Philippines, being considered as one of the most biologically diverse countries in the world, has been a treasure trove of new species discoveries.

The 2011 Philippine Biodiversity Expedition

AIMING to conduct the first “comprehensive survey of both terrestrial and marine diversity” in the Philippines, scientists, biologists, taxonomists, science educators and students from the University of the Philippines (UP) and the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) conducted the “2011 Philippine Biodiversity Expedition” which explored the forests of Mount Makiling, Mount Banahaw, Mount Isarog, the freshwater of Taal Lake, the shallow waters of marine ecosystems of the Verde Island Passage in Mabini and Anilao, Batangas, and the deep sea around Lubang Island, Mindoro.

The expedition was funded by a generous $500,000 gift from Margaret and Will Hearst III of the US as well as resources from the University of the Philippines.

From April 26 to June 8, 2011, the 94-member expedition team, including a group of American and Filipino journalists, documented the sites’ biodiversity and discovered new species. Dr. Terrence Gosliner, dean of the CAS, led the American team while Dr. Perry Ong, director of the UP Diliman Institute of Biology and Dr. Edwino Fernando of the UP Los Baños College of Forestry and Natural Resources, led the Filipino contingent.

The expedition was a baptism of fire for the then-newly installed administration of UP President Alfredo Pascual, who was able to mobilize the university’s resources to be actively involved in undertaking this international research collaboration on an extremely urgent environmental issue, that of biodiversity conservation. The 2011 Philippine Biodiversity Expedition is a reflection of the priorities of what the university intends to pursue in the coming years.

On February 9, 2012, Dr. Gosliner presented a follow up report on the results of the expedition at a forum held in UP Diliman.

“We were inspired to conduct the study here in the Philippines not just because of its biological richness but also because of the enthusiasm and receptivity to conservation recommendations expressed by our Filipino partners,” said Dr. Gosliner.

Discoveries

COMPRISED of more than 7,000 islands, the Philippines is home to a wide variety of species. This was reaffirmed by the expedition with the discovery of approximately 500 new species found in rainforests, coral reefs and the ocean floor.

According to Dr. Gosliner, among the interesting species discovered include a deep-sea, shrimp-eating shark that inflates its stomach with water to bulk up and scare off other predators; a cicada that makes a “laughing” call; three new lobster relatives that squeeze into crevices instead of carrying shells on their backs; a worm-like pipefish that hides among colonies of soft coral; a starfish that only eats sunken driftwood; and a crab with needle-like teeth on its pincers.

To confirm that these species are indeed new to science, scientists will now proceed to the next stage of exploration, using microscopes and DNA sequencing to complete the species’ identification and ultimately to publish these results.

Realizations

THE expedition did not just unveil new species but also validated the existence of environmental problems such as the continuous dumping of human waste in different bodies of water and the destruction of coral reefs caused by human activities.

According to Dr. Gosliner, the expedition made them realize the importance of biodiversity and research, science and environmental education, especially for children; connecting people to nature; individual actions; making education locally relevant; long-term sustainability versus short-term profit; partnerships; and integration of education, research, public policy and economics.

“We’re doing all these not just for the sake of knowledge but more important, for future generations. We are trying our very best to come up with best environmental-conservation efforts so as to ensure that our children will also experience the benefits from nature that we are enjoying now,” said Dr. Gosliner.

According to Dr. Perry Ong, “The discoveries made during this expedition reinforced the stature of the Philippines as a megadiverse country and as the hottest of the biodiversity hot spots. The importance of taking action now cannot be overemphasized. UP as the national university is taking on this challenge head on. Lest it be forgotten that most of Philippine biodiversity are endemic, that is found nowhere else except in the Philippines, and, thus, represents part of global patrimony, hence the responsibility of keeping them from becoming extinct lies not only with the Filipino people, though we should take the lead, but the global community as well. Thus, we appreciate all the help that we can get from the international research and conservation community such as the CAS, in partnerships and in the spirit of mutual respect and cooperation.”

Dr. Fernando expressed his willingness to be part of future scientific explorations to be held in the country, more especially in Mount Makiling.

“I believe that there’s still a lot to discover in the country, even in Mount Makiling alone. We are more than willing to participate in expeditions like this in the future. This is also a great opportunity for academic institutions to engage their students in this kind of work for them to appreciate the beauty of nature and eventually help conserve biodiversity,” said Dr. Fernando.

Rodrigo Fuentes, executive director of the Asean Centre for Biodiversity hailed the efforts and the results of the expedition.

“The discovery of new species in the Philippines once again proves the richness of the Philippines’s and Southeast Asia’s biodiversity. We have more natural treasures just around us waiting to be discovered. I hope that our young generation will have an interest in researching and learning the values of biodiversity—the variety of life on Earth—which sustains human life.”

Recommendations

AFTER the discoveries, the expedition team came up with the following recommendations for marine conservation: reduce marine debris and sedimentation; place more moorings at popular dive sites; enforce marine protected areas (MPAs) and increase their sizes; and establish new MPAs in unique habitats.

“It is unfortunate that Philippine forests and marine ecosystems have been continuously destroyed by human activities. Protected areas should be expanded and deforestations should be stopped,” said Dr. Gosliner.

The 2011 Philippine Biodiversity Expedition was able to demonstrate that environmental concern can be reinforced, not just by imagining life without all these natural wonders but also by appreciating what we still have.

The marine research team of the 2011 Philippine Biodiversity expedition did not just find new species of octocorals, barnacles, annelids and other marine life forms, but also a lot of waste polluting bodies of water and the terrestrial research team of the Philippine Biodiversity Expedition identifies and documents samples of flora and fauna found during the expedition. The team explored the peaks of Mount Makiling, Mount Isarog and Mount Banahaw.


Read more!

Best of our wild blogs: 25 Feb 12


Video clips of the Mangrove Pitta at Pasir Ris
from Bird Ecology Study Group

A Short Outing to MNT
from Beauty of Fauna and Flora in Nature

VJC IP students learn about local marine life, threats & how to make a difference!
from News from the International Coastal Cleanup Singapore


Read more!

New water alliance launched

Julia Ng Channel NewsAsia 24 Feb 12;

SINGAPORE: A new water alliance has been launched to lead research and specialist consultancy services in Southeast Asia.

In partnership with Dutch research institute Deltares, the National University of Singapore (NUS) has launched a new water alliance called NUSDeltares.

It aims to pursue high-impact water research and specialist consultancy services in Singapore and Southeast Asia.

Ambassador of the Netherlands to Singapore, Johannes WG Jansing, witnessed the signing of the Cooperation Agreement between NUS and Deltares.
e
The Agreement was signed by Professor Barry Halliwell, NUS deputy president (Research and Technology), and Mr Harry Baayen, managing director of Deltares.

NUSDeltares, which arose out of the Singapore-Delft Water Alliance initiative, builds upon the synergy of expertise from NUS and Deltares.

It will develop capabilities in areas such as urban water management; adaptation to climate change; operational management systems; as well as natural hazards, environmental risks and their mitigation.

The new water alliance will develop a network of collaborators across Southeast Asia and offer on-the-job-training or special short or degree courses and programmes.

National water agency (PUB) said the NUSDeltares will add to the vibrancy of the local water R&D eco-system, and strengthen Singapore's growing status as a global hydrohub.

Mr Chew Men Leong, chief executive of PUB and executive director of the Environment and Water Industry Programme Office, said: "We look forward to the contribution of its world-class experts in further developing Singapore's capabilities in urban water management and cutting-edge water technologies."

Prof Barry Halliwell said: "Sustainable water management is a topic of global importance. NUS already has strong capabilities in water research and management, and the establishment of NUSDeltares will further strengthen our foundation in this area.

"This new partnership deepens our long-standing collaboration with Deltares. We look forward to working closely with Deltares to provide sustainable urban water solutions for Southeast Asia and beyond."

Mr Harry Baayen said: "I am very pleased that our collaboration with NUS will continue via NUSDeltares. NUS is a leading university with international stature as well as a reliable partner for Deltares.

"Together, we provide the essential knowledge for Singapore and the surrounding region to develop innovative solutions for climate adaptation, urban water management, operational systems and natural hazards.

"The strength of this combination can make all the difference, both for public authorities and the business world."

- CNA/ck


Read more!

World Ocean Summit: World Bank to put together coalition to rescue world's oceans

Int'l body will also help muster US$1.5b in five years to protect marine areas
Lynn Kan Business Times 25 Feb 12;

THE World Bank will put together a new global coalition - and help muster US$1.5 billion in five years - to rescue the world's oceans from the threats of overfishing, climate change, and pollution they now face.

Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank Group, said the Global Partnership for Oceans starts with US$300 million that will give 'technical assistance to key governance reforms that can create the necessary incentives for long-term investment, as well as to help operate marine protected areas'.

Another US$1.2 billion will be sought from stakeholders in the Partnership like governments, international civil society, the scientific community and private sector companies.

An international alliance like the Global Partnership for Oceans was needed, said Mr Zoellick, because the scale of ensuring the sustainability of oceans 'is such that singular efforts are simply not enough'.

'To make our oceans healthy and productive again, we need greater cooperative and integrated action around the globe, so that our efforts add up to more than the sum of their parts,' he said at the two-day World Oceans Summit at the Capella Singapore.

The world's oceans, which cover over 70 per cent of the world's surface, provide 15 per cent of the world's protein consumption. About 350 million jobs are also connected to the oceans through fishing, aquaculture, coastal and marine tourism and research. 'When we devalue our natural capital, it is often the poor who feel the greatest harm. Oceans provide a wealth of goods and services that make a tremendous contribution to overcoming poverty, creating opportunity, and spurring economic growth,' explained Mr Zoellick.

The Global Partnership for Oceans will hold its first meeting in Washington, DC in April.

Already, it counts state-level and international organisations like Conservation International, the World Wildlife Fund, the UN Environment Programme, and the Prince of Wales Charities who have signed up to it.

Private sector actors like the Darden Restaurants and the National Fisheries Institute have also signalled their support.

Mr Zoellick yesterday tabled some ambitious targets for the coalition to achieve in the next 10 years.

One of them is to rebuild ocean fisheries, of which 85 per cent have been exploited or depleted, threatening the stocks of the world's top 10 fish species.

The partnership also aims to turn around fisheries which have been running at a net economic loss of US$5 billion a year to a scenario where they create net benefits of between US$20 billion and US$30 billion.

'We need to turn this around, by allocating and enforcing the rights of fisheries and reforming subsidies,' Mr Zoellick said.

The coalition will also double the 2 per cent of the ocean's surface that are marine protected areas to about 5 per cent. In comparison, 12 per cent of the land's surface is protected.

'There is much more to do. Meeting these goals will take significant steps towards reversing the dangerous, centuries-old deterioration of ocean and coastal ecosystems,' added Mr Zoellick. 'This is a critical start.'

World Bank leads drive to save oceans
Global partnership to tackle problems such as marine degradation
Yasmine Yahya Straits Times 25 Feb 12;

WORLD Bank president Robert Zoellick sent out an SOS yesterday - to Save Our Seas.

To this end, he launched a new international initiative to save the world's oceans.

The Global Partnership for Oceans will bring together governments, international organisations, civil society groups and the private sector, he said.

They will pool knowledge and resources to confront problems such as over-fishing, marine degradation and habitat loss.

For a start, Mr Zoellick said, the partnership will commit at least US$300 million (S$380 million) to fund governance reforms that will create incentives for long-term investment in oceans, and to help operate marine protected areas.

The partnership hopes to raise another US$1.2 billion over the next five years to support other projects.

The World Bank itself is investing a separate US$1.6 billion in coastal zone management, fisheries and marine protected areas.

He was speaking on the final day of the World Ocean Summit organised by The Economist magazine. The three-day conference at the Capella Singapore Resort in Sentosa saw business and environmental leaders discussing issues related to oceans.

He outlined several main targets for the partnership in the next 10 years.

These include rebuilding the world's depleted fish stocks, protecting at least 5 per cent of the world's ocean surface, and increasing the supply of fish from sustainable aquaculture.

'About 85 per cent of ocean fisheries are fully exploited, over-exploited or depleted,' he noted.

'We need to do much better, not only to help secure a reliable source of food, but also to take the pressure off ocean fish stocks.'

A statement from the World Bank said that a number of developed and developing countries have pledged support for the partnership. Several organisations have done the same, including the National Geographic Society, the World Ocean Council, the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation, the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and Conservation International. Further discussions will be held to define the new initiative's specific agenda, the statement added.

The head of the UNDP's water and ocean governance programme, Mr Andrew Hudson, noted in a statement: 'Almost all the challenges facing ocean sustainability stem from governance and market failures.'

Conservation International chief executive Peter Seligmann said that as the world's population grows to nine billion people by 2050, demand for food and other resources will double.

'It is in the enlightened self-interest of all nations and all communities to wisely steward our oceans. Collaboration is essential,' he said.

One of the private-sector groups that have pledged commitment to the partnership is Darden Restaurants, which is well-known for its Red Lobster chain of restaurants in the United States.

Its vice-president of seafood purchasing, Mr Roger Bing, said: 'Like so many, we depend on the natural resources the oceans provide, and investing in their health helps ensure the long-term viability of those resources.'

Environmental sustainability has long been a central feature of the World Bank's global strategy. It is involved in a range of projects, from conserving forests to boosting global tiger populations.

World Bank issues SOS for oceans, backs alliance
David Fogarty Reuters Yahoo News 24 Feb 12;

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - The World Bank announced on Friday a global alliance to better manage and protect the world's oceans, which are under threat from over-fishing, pollution and climate change.

Oceans are the lifeblood of the planet and the global economy, World Bank President Robert Zoellick told a conference on ocean conservation in Singapore. Yet the seas have become overexploited, coastlines badly degraded and reefs under threat from pollution and rising temperatures.

"We need a new SOS: Save Our Seas," Zoellick said in announcing the alliance.

The partnership would bring together countries, scientific centers, non-governmental groups, international organizations, foundations and the private sector, he said.

The World Bank could help guide the effort by bringing together existing global ocean conservation programs and support efforts to mobilize finance and develop market-mechanisms to place a value on the benefits that oceans provide.

Millions of people rely on oceans for jobs and food and that dependence will grow as the world's population heads for 9 billion people, underscoring the need to better manage the seas.

Zoellick said the alliance was initially committed to mobilizing at least $300 million in finance.

"Working with governments, the scientific community, civil society organizations, and the private sector, we aim to leverage as much as $1.2 billion to support healthy and sustainable oceans."

FISH STOCKS

A key focus was understanding the full value of the oceans' wealth and ecosystem services. Oceans are the top source of oxygen, help regulate the climate, while mangroves, reefs and wetlands are critical to protecting increasingly populous coastal areas against hazards such as storms -- benefits that are largely taken for granted.

"Whatever the resource, it is impossible to evolve a plan to manage and grow the resource without knowing its value," he said.

Another aim was to rebuild at least half the world's fish stocks identified as depleted. About 85 percent of ocean fisheries are fully exploited, over-exploited or depleted.

"We should increase the annual net benefits of fisheries to between $20 billion and $30 billion. We estimate that global fisheries currently run a net economic loss of about $5 billion per year," he said.

Participants at the conference spoke of the long-term dividends from ocean conservation and better management of its resources. But that needed economists, bankers and board rooms to place a value on the oceans' "natural capital".

"The key to the success of this partnership will be new market mechanisms that value natural capital and can attract private finance," Abyd Karmali, global head of carbon markets at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, told Reuters.

He pointed to the value in preserving carbon-rich mangrove forests and sea grassbeds and the possibility of earning carbon offsets for projects that conserve these areas.

"The oceans' stock is in trouble. We have diminished its asset value to a huge degree and poor asset management is poor economics," Stephen Palumbi, director of the Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, told the conference.

(Editing by Robert Birsel)

World Bank urges global action to save oceans
AFP Yahoo News 25 Feb 12;

The World Bank on Friday said the world's oceans were at risk and called for a coalition of governments, NGOs and other groups to protect them, aiming to raise $1.5 billion in five years.

"The world’s oceans are in danger," from over-fishing, marine degradation and loss of habitat, World Bank president Robert Zoellick said. "Send out the S-O-S: We need to Save Our Seas."

About 85 percent of ocean fisheries are fully exploited, over-exploited or depleted, including most of the stocks of the top 10 species, he told the World Oceans Summit in Singapore.

"The facts don't lie and the statistics are we are not doing enough, we are not accomplishing enough and the oceans continue to get sick and die," he said.

Zoellick said there were already "considerable resources devoted" to restoring the planet's oceans, but a huge, coordinated global effort was needed.

He proposed several targets for the Global Partnership for Oceans to achieve in the next 10 years, including rebuilding at least half of the world's fish stocks.

Marine protected areas should be more than doubled, he said, noting that less than two percent of the ocean's surface is protected compared to around 12 percent of land.

On the economic side alone the implications are enormous if little is done, he told the gathering.

In developing countries, one billion people depend on fish and seafood for their primary source of protein and over half a billion rely on fishing as a means of livelihood, Zoellick said.

For developing countries, including many island and coastal nations, fish represent the single most traded food product, and for many Pacific Island states fish make up 80 percent of total exports.

Zoellick described the initiative as a "new approach".

The coalition "will bring together countries, scientific centres, NGOs, international organisations, foundations and the private sector to pool knowledge, experience, expertise, and investment around a set of agreed upon goals," he said.

As a starting point, the partnership is committing to raise at least $300 million in "catalytic finance", meaning funds that would be used for technical assistance for key governance reforms, he said.

Another $1.2 billion would be raised "to support healthy and sustainable oceans," he added.

"This would total $1.5 billion in new commitments over five years," he said, adding that the World Bank would convene the first meeting of the partnership in Washington in April.

Environmental group World Wildlife Fund (WWF) lauded the initiative.

"WWF welcomes the renewed interest in the Bank in marine conservation activities. I think this is an important step forward to help all of us advance the marine conservation agenda," said Jason Clay, senior vice president of market transformation for the WWF.

He told AFP the proposal would help to reform global fisheries to make them more sustainable, raise the visibility of marine protected areas and promote ocean conservation to governments and the public.

Addressing the conference on Thursday, Kiribati President Anote Tong called for a change in the way humanity treated oceans.

"We must cease to behave as if we live in a cowboy economy, with unlimited new territory to be conquered," he said.

People must "learn to treat our oceans something like a spaceship where every effort has to be made to recycle materials, reduce waste and pollution and manage resources sustainably," he added.


Read more!

World Ocean Summit: Using - not abusing - the precious Arctic

Exploit resources only after standards are set, summit told
Amanda Eber Business Times 25 Feb 12;

'THE Arctic is hot.'

That's how Gustaf Lind, Swedish Ambassador for the Arctic, opened his introductory speech during the 'The Arctic: Beacon of Hope?' session of The Economist World Oceans Summit on Thursday afternoon.

Making a seemingly contradictory statement, he explained the cause to be both literal temperature increases due to climate change, as well as the metaphorical heat of the burgeoning business interests, environmental concerns, political interests and media attention currently focused on the Arctic.

Mr Lind added that the Arctic Council was 'gearing up for the challenges' looming in the future that would require 'close cooperation' between scientists and politicians as well as the importance of involving indigenous people in the decision-making process.

During the session, Anton Vasiliev, Ambassador at Large, Russian Representative to the Arctic Council, also announced Russia's launch of a new project for further Arctic exploration.

Similarly, Robert Blaauw, senior Arctic advisor of Shell International, stressed the importance of unconventional energy sources in the face of ballooning global energy demands.

According to him, energy demand is set to double present levels by 2050 and Shell sees the Arctic as a potential new source to meet this growing need.

Mr Blaauw attempted to address environmental concerns on Arctic drilling by stating that Shell's oil spill response plan had been approved by the US authorities.

'If we couldn't do it, we wouldn't,' he said.

However, this did little to assuage the worries of the environmentalists at the session. Joshua Reichert, managing director of the Pew Environment Group, questioned the true ability of potential extractors like Shell to respond to oil spills under unfamiliar Arctic conditions - raising the point that the US federal requirements Shell meets apply only to temperate waters and do not hold for the vastly different conditions in the Arctic.

Lisa Speer, director of the International Oceans Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, agreed.

'A major oil spill like the one in the Gulf of Mexico is like having a heart attack in a New York City hospital,' she said. An Arctic oil spill would, for example, vastly limit the ability of the US Coast Guard to respond.

A possible solution was put forth in the form of an argument for specific standards to be established for the Arctic before any activities are carried out. Ultimately, as Mr Vasiliev put it: 'The Arctic is our house, our future - we want to keep it clean.'


Read more!